DOCSLIB.ORG

Border Areas – Encounter Areas Neighbourhood Conflicts and Neighbourhood Co-Operations in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BORDER AREAS – ENCOUNTER AREAS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONFLICTS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD CO-OPERATIONS IN EUROPE SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON THE OCCASION OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ICOMOS EUROPE GROUP (BERLIN, 3–6 JUNE 2017) ICOMOS DEUTSCHES NATIONALKOMITEE ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATION I ICOMOS GERMAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION I ICOMOS COMITÉ NATIONAL ALLEMAND PUBLICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE I BORDER AREAS – ENCOUNTER AREAS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONFLICTS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD CO-OPERATIONS IN EUROPE SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON THE OCCASION OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ICOMOS EUROPE GROUP (BERLIN, 3–6 JUNE 2017) ICOMOS DEUTSCHES NATIONALKOMITEE ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATION I ICOMOS GERMAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION I ICOMOS COMITÉ NATIONAL ALLEMAND PUBLICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE I ICOMOS Deutsches Nationalkomitee – Elektronische Publikation Herausgegeben vom Nationalkomitee der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Präsident: Prof. Dr. Jörg Haspel Vizepräsident: Dr. Christoph Machat Generalsekretärin: Prof. Dr. Sigrid Brandt Geschäftsstelle: Brüderstraße 13, Nicolaihaus, D-10178 Berlin Fon: +49 (0)30.80493 100 · Fax: +49 (0)30.80493 120 E-Mail: [email protected] · Internet: www.icomos.de Mit freundlicher Unterstützung durch die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien aufgrund eines Beschlusses des Deutschen Bundestages. Editing: John Ziesemer Front Cover: Participants of the symposium at the Berlin Wall Memorial (photo ICOMOS Germany) Back Cover: Aerial view of the Hufeisensiedlung, Berlin (photo Landesdenkmalamt Berlin) © 2018 ICOMOS, Nationalkomitee der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Nachdruck, auch auszugsweise, sowie Verbreitung durch Film, Funk und Fernsehen, durch fotomecha- nische Wiedergabe, Tonträger und Datenverarbeitungssysteme jeglicher Art, nur mit schriftlicher Genehmigung des Verlages. Satz: Hendrik Bäßler, Berlin 4 Content Preface Michael Cramer Jörg Haspel, President of ICOMOS Germany, The ‘Iron Curtain Trail’. Sustainable Mobility Axel Klausmeier, Director of the Berlin as a European “Peace” Project. 47 Wall Foundation . 5 Welcoming Speech by the Sharing the Heritage of War and Peace in Berlin Senator for Culture and Europe, Neighbouring European Countries Dr. Klaus Lederer . 7 Boguslaw Szmygin Welcome and Greetings by Border Regions and Cross Border Activities ICOMOS Vice President in / from Poland . 55 Grellan D. Rourke . 9 Waltraud Kofler Engl Front Lines and Cooperation Lines. The Heritage of War in the Euroregion Tyrol – Alto Adige – Sharing Europe’s Cold War Heritage – Trentino . 60 the Iron Curtain from the Berlin Wall to the Green Belt Europe Irit Amit Cohen Conservation of Rural Encounter Space. Axel Klausmeier The Case of Agricultural Cooperative Settlements The Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain – and Open Space in Israel. 65 from a Death Strip to a Memorial Landscape and to a European Heritage Label Network . 12 Dražen Arbutina The Croatian Heritage of Borders – Barbara Engels Conflicting Narratives but Shared Pain . 75 The European Green Belt as UNESCO World Heritage? Results of a Multilevel Feasibility Tatjana Adamič, Marko Stokin Study . 17 The Walk of Peace from the Alps to the Adriatic Sea . 81 Hans Peter Jeschke The “European Green Belt and the Iron Curtain” Andras Veöreös – a Linear Cultural Landscape Zone. A Heritage Ensemble after the Population Exchange. Comments on the Structure and Concept Questions to the Historic Town Centre of Sopron . .86 as a Natural and Cultural Heritage of Outstanding Significance . 23 Claus-Peter Echter The Neustadt of Strasbourg . 89 Peter Waldhäusl The Network of Boundaries and its Monuments Irmela Spelsberg for World Heritage . 37 French-German-Polish Shared Heritage. 92 Sergey Gorbatenko Sharing Heritage in the Baltic Region and in Marius Müller the Northwest of Russia . 44 ESACH Report. 99 5 Preface Heritage plays an important role for the cultural and eco- – Theme 1 – Europe: Exchange and movement asks of nomic development and for the social coherence in Eu- the importance and significance of Europe’s common rope. To promote cultural heritage, the European Union routes, paths and axes. declared 2018 as the European Cultural Heritage Year – Connective aspects serve as the starting point for Theme (ECHY) and chose the slogan Sharing Heritage. In Ger- 2 – Europe: Border and encounter regions. many, archaeological and architectural monuments and – Theme 3 – The European city puts at its heart the city, sites provide the basis for the ECHY activities. Special which is a central element of our common European consideration will be given to projects that show how ad- cultural heritage and presence and manifestation of his- ditional forms of tangible and intangible cultural heritage tory. can be integrated. Five leading themes have been defined – Theme 4 – Europe: Remembrance and new starts re- to illustrate key aspects of the European Cultural Heritage calls reasons and wounds of the European wars, which Year: are associated with hopes of change.. Excursion Group of the ICOMOS Europe Meeting 2017 in Berlin at the Glienicke Bridge (constructed 1906 – 07 between Berlin and Potsdam, rebuilt after damages in World War II). During the Cold War the bridge formed the border between East (East Germany) and West (West-Berlin) and became known as Bridge of Spies used to exchange arrested people between East and West. Since the fall of the Iron Curtain and the German reunification (1989–90) the Havel bridge connects the UNESCO World Heritage site Palaces and Parks of Potsdam and Berlin. In 2011, the iron construction was awarded the European Heritage Label ( photo ICOMOS Germany). 6 Preface Poles of corten steel marking the border line of the Former death strip between the Berlin Wall and the former Berlin Wall along Bernauer Straße Spree River: the longest remaining section of the Berlin (photo ICOMOS Germany). Wall gained fame as the city’s longest picture wall and open-air gallery in 1990. It is called East Side Gallery because of more than 100 paintings on the street side (photo ICOMOS Germany) – Networks for exchanging and sharing cultural heritage al of the barbed wire between Austria and Hungary and are the common ground for Theme 5 with the title Eu- with the opening of the Berlin Wall in 1989 – ICOMOS rope: Living Heritage. Germany and the Berlin Wall Foundation organised the scientific colloquium of ICOMOS Europe under the The fall of the Berlin Wall and the opening of the Iron guiding topic Border Areas – Encounter Areas. Neigh- Curtain between 1989 and 1991 fundamentally changed bourhood Conflicts and Neighbourhood Cooperations in the political landscape in Europe. The consequences of Europe. the peaceful revolution for the present demarcations and In accordance with the Sharing Heritage slogan of the for nation-building in Europe are comparable to the po- European Cultural Heritage Year, the scientific symposi- litical realignments in Central and Eastern Europe after um of ICOMOS Europe wished to afford all participating the Thirty-Years-War (1618–1648), the First World War ICOMOS national committees the opportunity to reflect (1914–1918), including the downfall of the Ottoman, processes of adopting, rejecting and adapting the joint Habsburg and German Empires, and finally after the cultural heritage in a transnational context and to intro- Second World War (1939–1945). In the newly structured duce experiences made with bi- and multinational neigh- territories, art and culture of the previous societies and bourhood initiatives and cooperation projects. For this states have been preserved. Furthermore, the history of purpose, activities in transnational European regions and war and tyranny, of flight and expulsion has also become explicitly in the so-called “EuroRegions” could provide manifest in material evidence as well as in the destruction cultural-geographic and historical-geographic reference of monuments. points. Four hundred years after the beginning of the Thir- The scientific colloquium wished to approach the top- ty-Years-War in 1618 and one hundred years after the ic of Border Areas – Encounter Areas. Neighbourhood end of the First World War in 1918, which was largely Conflicts and Neighbourhood Cooperations in Europe a European war, the European Cultural Heritage Year mainly from two perspectives: In the first section, the (ECHY) 2018 will be dedicated to the heritage of war border and connecting line of the Iron Curtain, dividing and peace and to the idea of transnational understanding Europe after the war as insurmountable death strip and and reconciliation. The annual meeting of ICOMOS Eu- today an important intertwined European area between rope in June 2017, which took place in Germany for the East and West, was meant to be a thematic focus and to be first time, was meant to advance multinational discussion discussed as a modern European border landscape with and help prepare the European Cultural Heritage Year outstanding cultural and natural heritage: Sharing Eu- and its thematic focuses in 2018. In the context of the rope’s Cold War Heritage – the Iron Curtain between the European unification process and the German reunifica- Berlin Wall and Green Belt Europe. In the second section, tion after 1989 – symbolically heralded with the remov- bi- and multinational border and encounter areas served 7 Preface as framework for discussing historic and current neigh- Students’ Association for Cultural Heritage (ESACH) was bourhood conflicts and cooperations on a European scale: able to take part in the colloquium and write a compre- Sharing the
Recommended publications
  • Mapping of Cultural Heritage Actions in European Union Policies, Programmes and Activities

    Mapping of Cultural Heritage Actions in European Union Policies, Programmes and Activities

    Mapping of Cultural Heritage actions in European Union policies, programmes and activities Last update: April 2017 This mapping exercise aims to contribute to the development of a strategic approach to the preservation and valorisation of European heritage. It responds to the "Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe" adopted by the Council of the European Union on 20th May 2014, and complements the European Commission Communication "Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe", published on 22 July 2014. The document provides a wide (but not exhaustive) range of useful information about recent policy initiatives and support actions undertaken by the European Union in the field of cultural heritage. Table of Contents 1. CULTURE ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 EU policy / legislation ................................................................................ 5 Council Work Plan for Culture 2015-2018 ........................................................... 5 Priority Area A: Accessible and inclusive culture .................................... 5 Priority Area B: Cultural heritage ......................................................... 5 Priority Area C: Cultural and creative sectors: Creative economy and innovation ........................................................................................ 6 Priority area D: Promotion of cultural diversity, culture in the EU external relations and
  • Beth Am's Journey to Germany & Poland

    Beth Am's Journey to Germany & Poland

    Beth Am’s Journey to Germany & Poland $5,469 per person in double occupancy +$1,199 single occupancy supplement Package includes: • Round-trip bus from Beth Am to JFK Airport • Round-trip flights on Air Berlin • Westin Hotel, Berlin; Radisson Hotel, Warsaw; Vanilla Hotel, Lublin (or similar); Holiday Inn, Krakow. • Private sightseeing with outstanding educator/guide on a program specially designed and led by Dr. Michael Sanow and Rabbi Kelley Gludt • Meet with leaders of the various Jewish communities and attend the Klezmer Music Festival. • Breakfast daily, welcome dinner in Berlin, Shabbat dinner in Berlin, Shabbat dinner in Warsaw and Farewell Dinner • Tips to driver, guide, and porters Sites include: • Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe • Berlin’s Jewish Museum • The Wansee Villa • Ravensbruck • Polin (Museum of the History of the Polish Jews) • The Warsaw Ghetto • Majdanek Death Camp, Auschwitz • Jewish Krakow For more information, please contact: Dr. Michael Sanow [email protected] Exploring Jewish History, the Holocaust & Jewish Life Today led by Dr. Michael Sanow & Rabbi Kelley Gludt June 13 – 27, 2017 Tuesday, June 13 walk through the Okapova Street Jewish cemetery, you Depart by bus from Beth Am to New York’s John F. Kennedy Saturday, June 17 will get great insight into the history of Warsaw’s Jews and Airport. Check in and depart on Air Berlin on your non-stop Shabbat. The bus will take us to services at The Masorti be left with the question as to why this cemetery survived flight to Berlin. Congregation and back to the hotel following the Kiddush. the Nazis.
  • The European Green Belt Factor Dare to Connect

    The European Green Belt Factor Dare to Connect

    10th Pan-European Green Belt Conference 15th-19th October 2018 in Eisenach/Wartburg, Germany Session 4 – Instruments to secure and improve the functionality of the European Green Belt The European Green Belt Factor Dare to Connect Melanie Kreutz BUND Department Green Belt Regional Coordinator Green Belt Central Europe Content Results of the Research- and Development- (R+D-) Project “The European Green Belt as part of Green Infrastructure”: Updated database on protected areas and gap analysis Central European Green Belt Results of 1-km-Buffer-Analysis of the Inner-German Green Belt Examples for the capitalization of results R+D-Project “The European Green Belt as part of GI” Updated data collection Protected areas in 150 km corridor R+D-Project “The European Green Belt as part of GI” Protected Areas in the European Green Belt IUCN I to VI, Natura 2000, Emerald, national parks, biosphere reserves: At least protected percentage in an 1 km-corridor: 47 % protected parts along EGB At least protected percentage in a 50 km-corridor: 27 % protected parts along EGB Connectivity Analysis (case studies Central Europe and Balkan): With decreasing distance to the border (former Iron Curtain) the percentage of protected areas is increasing and the average distance between protected areas is declining 1-km-Buffer-Analysis Green Belt Germany Aim: providing a more detailed picture of the relationship between the proportion of protected areas and the distance to the former Iron Curtain along the Green Belt Germany What is the spatial extent in which such an effect can be observed (in east and west direction)? 1.
  • Archbishop Says Berlin Wall Was a Good Friday in German History

    Archbishop Says Berlin Wall Was a Good Friday in German History

    Archbishop says Berlin Wall was a Good Friday in German history BERLIN (CNS) — Catholics and Protestants gathered Aug. 13 to remember the day in 1961 when their city was divided, becoming a symbol of the Cold War. Catholic Archbishop Heiner Koch joined his Protestant counterpart, Bishop Christian Stäblein, for an ecumenical prayer service in the Chapel of Reconciliation, on the spot where part of the wall was built. Today, a few wall remnants still remain in a remembrance garden. Archbishop Koch reminded those gathered in the small chapel that without Good Friday, there would not have been a Resurrection on Easter. “Today we remember one of the Good Fridays in the history of Berlin and Germany. We have gathered at one of the many Golgotha mounds in our city and our country, directly at a monument that for many of us was a symbol of bondage and confinement, and which reminds us today of the preciousness of freedom,” he said. Archbishop Koch remembered how, as a young boy, he was on vacation with his parents in Italy when the wall went up. He recalled the anger and powerlessness of his parents and other adults as they watched, in disbelief, the images on television. It was his mother’s birthday, but no one was celebrating. Early on that Sunday morning in 1961, the Soviet sector border was sealed off when more than 10,000 East German security forces started to tear up the pavement in Berlin; they erected barricades and barbed wire fences. A few days later, the concrete slabs that would become the wall started to go up.
  • The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 by Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011

    The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 by Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011

    Special CWIHP Research Report The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 By Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011 Forty-four years after the Berlin Wall was built and 15 years after the East German archives were opened, reliable data on the number of people killed at the Wall were still lacking. Depending on the sources, purpose, and date of the studies, the figures varied between 78 (Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations in Salzgitter), 86 (Berlin Public Prosecution Service), 92 (Berlin Police President), 122 (Central Investigation Office for Government and Unification Criminality), and more than 200 deaths (Working Group 13 August). The names of many of the victims, their biographies and the circumstances in which they died were widely unknown.1 This special CWIHP report summarizes the findings of a research project by the Center for Research on Contemporary History Potsdam and the Berlin Wall Memorial Site and Documentation Center which sought to establish the number and identities of the individuals who died at the Berlin Wall between 1961 and 1989 and to document their lives and deaths through historical and biographical research.2 Definition In order to provide reliable figures, the project had to begin by developing clear criteria and a definition of what individuals are to be considered victims at the Berlin Wall. We regard the “provable causal and spatial connection of a death with an attempted escape or a direct or indirect cause or lack of action by the ‘border organs’ in the border territory” as the critical factor. In simpler terms: the criteria are either an attempted escape or a temporal and spatial link between the death and the border regime.
  • UNESCO Heritage Sites and Cultural Spaces in Ethnographic Regions of ESTONIA - Setomaa, Kihnu Island, LATVIA - Suiti Land, Livonian Coast, and SOUTH COAST of FINLAND

    UNESCO Heritage Sites and Cultural Spaces in Ethnographic Regions of ESTONIA - Setomaa, Kihnu Island, LATVIA - Suiti Land, Livonian Coast, and SOUTH COAST of FINLAND

    UNESCO HERITAGE SITES AND CULTURAL SPACES IN Ethnographic Regions of ESTONIA - Setomaa, Kihnu Island, LATVIA - Suiti Land, Livonian Coast, and SOUTH COAST OF FINLAND PROGRAMMES FOR TOURISTS The north-eastern shores of Baltic Sea washes three states – Finland, Estonia and Latvia. For centuries these countries have shared common cultural landscape, exchanged and mutually enriched one another’s culture. The way of life in this region characterized by shared cultural context, values and natural resources has developed traditions specific to each nation yet keeping common Nordic-Baltic spirit in every cultural expression. For this reason it is worthwhile taking a closer look into the region finding out what heritage values it has to offer, and which of them are internationally recognized by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) an organisation which works to promote and safeguard the heritage of humanity. 1 2 What is UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage? One of the most beautiful UNESCO developed lists of this kind is devoted to promotion of intangible cultural heritage. With the term “intangible cultural heritage”, we understand different forms of oral expressions, languages and dialects, social practices, festive events, performing arts and rituals, traditional knowledge and Destination craftsmanship, including instruments and objects associated with them, as well as area – Latvia, cultural spaces. Estonia and Cultural spaces are special places where traditions passed down from generation South Coast of to generation are concentrated in an environment that relates to the origins Finland. of such traditions. In Latvia and Estonia, Estonia, Latvia and Finland are multiple cultural spaces can be found neighbouring countries in the North which are promoted by UNESCO granting of Europe and Scandinavia, on the international recognition.

  • After the Berlin Wall Hope M

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04931-4 — After the Berlin Wall Hope M. Harrison Frontmatter More Information AFTER THE BERLIN WALL The history and meaning of the Berlin Wall remain controversial, even three decades after its fall. Drawing on an extensive range of archival sources and interviews, this book profiles key memory activists who have fought to commemorate the history of the Berlin Wall and examines their role in the creation of a new German national narrative. With victims, perpetrators, and heroes, the Berlin Wall has joined the Holocaust as an essential part of German collective memory. Key Wall anniversaries have become signposts marking German views of the past, its relevance to the present, and the complicated project of defining German national iden- tity. Considering multiple German approaches to remembering the Wall via memorials, trials, public ceremonies, films, and music, this revelatory work also traces how global memory of the Wall has impacted German memory policy. It depicts the power and fragility of state-backed memory projects, and the potential of such projects to reconcile or divide. hope m. harrison is Associate Professor of History and International Affairs at the George Washington University. The recipient of fellowships from Fulbright, the Wilson Center, and the American Academy in Berlin, she is the author of Driving the Soviets up the Wall (2003), which was awarded the 2004 Marshall Shulman Book Prize by the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, and was also published to wide acclaim in German translation. She has served on the National Security Council staff, currently serves on the board of three institutions in Berlin connected to the Cold War and the Berlin Wall, and has appeared on CNN, the History Channel, the BBC, and Deutschlandradio.
  • Green Belt Goes Baltic: Closing the Gap Between Central Europe and Fennoscandia

    Green Belt Goes Baltic: Closing the Gap Between Central Europe and Fennoscandia

    Green Belt goes Baltic: Closing the Gap between Central Europe and Fennoscandia Young people in the southern and eastern Baltic Sea countries today can hardly understand why only two decades ago people were allowed to visit only designated beaches, why gigantic spot lights lit the beaches at night, why the Latvian shoreline was literally combed every day or why peninsulas were turned into mine fi elds in Germany. Since those times, these coasts have experienced a tremendous boom in building and development – largely not following the rules of sustainable development. An increasing demand for space for uses such as tourism, harbour and marina development, sand extraction, and power constructions confl icts seriously with nature conservation eff orts. At the same time, European Directives such as NATURA 2000, the Water Framework Directive, the recommendations for and evaluation of integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) and the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive have already or will trigger a number of national legal acts which can support future conservation of the Baltic Sea coast. However, these top-down activities need to be accompanied by bottom-up initiatives for full implementation in society. Th is is where the Baltic Green Belt sets in. Wustrow peninsula at the German Baltic Sea Coast - For years the map showing the European Green Belt’s path from the Barents Sea to the Adriatic and an example of former military areas at the coast still Black Seas has been blemished by a dashed line running along the south-eastern Baltic Sea from closed to the public today (Photo: S.
  • Grenzen Und Nachbarschaften, Wanderungen Und Begegnung Frontières Et Voisinages, Migrations Et Rencontre

    Grenzen Und Nachbarschaften, Wanderungen Und Begegnung Frontières Et Voisinages, Migrations Et Rencontre

    GRENZEN UND NACHBARSCHAFTEN, WANDERUNGEN UND BEGEGNUNG FRONTIÈRES ET VOISINAGES, MIGRATIONS ET RENCONTRE ICOMOS DEUTSCHES NATIONALKOMITEE ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATION III ICOMOS GERMAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION III ICOMOS COMITÉ NATIONAL ALLEMAND PUBLICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE III GRENZEN UND NACHBARSCHAFTEN, WANDERUNGEN UND BEGEGNUNG FRONTIÈRES ET VOISINAGES, MIGRATIONS ET RENCONTRE Dokumentation der Tagung der Arbeitsgruppe „Migration und Erbe“ von ICOMOS Deutschland in Zusammenarbeit mit der Arbeitsgruppe SAGE der Universität Strasbourg und der Fakultät Architektur und Bauwesen der Hochschule Technik und Wirtschaft Karlsruhe im Rahmen des Europäischen Kulturerbejahres Karlsruhe / Strasbourg, 13. bis 15. September 2018 Herausgegeben von Sigrid Brandt und Christoph Schwarzkopf ICOMOS DEUTSCHES NATIONALKOMITEE ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATION BAND III ICOMOS GERMAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION BAND III ICOMOS COMITÉ NATIONAL ALLEMAND PUBLICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE BAND III ICOMOS Deutsches Nationalkomitee – Elektronische Publikation Herausgegeben vom Nationalkomitee der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Präsident: Prof. Dr. Jörg Haspel Vizepräsidentin: Prof. Dr. Sigrid Brandt Generalsekretär: Gregor Hitzfeld Geschäftsstelle: Deutsches Nationalkomitee von ICOMOS e. V. Brüderstraße 13 · Nicolaihaus · 10178 Berlin Tel.: +49 (0) 30.80 493 100 · Fax /Tel.: +49 (0) 30.80 493 120 E-mail: [email protected] · Internet: www.icomos.de Mit freundlicher Unterstützung durch die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien aufgrund eines Beschlusses
  • Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan Mcmurry Western Oregon University, Kmcmurry13@Wou.Edu

    Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan Mcmurry Western Oregon University, [email protected]

    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2018 Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan McMurry Western Oregon University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Legal Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation McMurry, Keegan, "Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials" (2018). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 264. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/264 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Schießbefehl1 and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan J. McMurry History 499: Senior Seminar June 5, 2018 1 On February 5th, 1989, 20-year old Chris Gueffroy and his companion, Christian Gaudin, were running for their lives. Tired of the poor conditions in the German Democratic Republic and hoping to find better in West Germany, they intended to climb the Berlin Wall that separated East and West Berlin using a ladder. A newspaper account states that despite both verbal warnings and warning shots, both young men continued to try and climb the wall until the border guards opened fire directly at them. Mr. Gaudin survived the experience after being shot, however, Mr.
  • Knowledge and Development of Modern Military Structures

    Knowledge and Development of Modern Military Structures

    Dipartimento di Progettazione dell’Architettura (DPA) KNOWLEDGE AND DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN MILITARY STRUCTURES Luoghi e architetture della transizione: 1919 – 1939. I sistemi difensivi di confine e la protezione antiaerea nelle città. Storia, conservazione e riuso Sites and architectural structures of the transition period: 1919 – 1939. Border defense systems and air raid protection in the cities. History, conservation and reuse II Congresso Internazionale a cura di Maria Antonietta Breda 2nd International Congress by Maria Antonietta Breda 27 – 28 Novembre 2012 – ore 9.00 – 18.30 Politecnico di Milano – via Durando 10 Milano – Campus Bovisa – Aula Castiglioni edificio PK November 27-28, 2012 – 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM Politecnico di Milano – Via Durando 10, Milan –Bovisa Campus – Castiglioni Room PK building Diretta video: Napoli Underground Channel – Live video: Napoli Underground Channel http://www.napoliunderground.org/it/component/content/article/58-nug-channel.html PRESENTAZIONE 1919 – 1939. La Grande Guerra si è conclusa, ma i trattati per la pace non diminuiscono le disparità economiche preesistenti tra gli Stati. La storiografia dell’epoca riconosce che proprio in quei patti vi è la genesi del secondo conflitto mondiale. Nonostante da più parti si invochi la pace e si confidi nelle capacità diplomatiche per risolvere le crisi tra gli stati, sul territorio europeo tutte le nazioni rafforzano e completano i propri sistemi difensivi di confine. Inoltre, coscienti che l’arma aerea, già usata durante il primo conflitto, potrebbe trasformare le città in campi di battaglia, si impongono provvedimenti per la protezione collettiva della popolazione civile delle grandi città e dei centri vitali. La guerra chimica è definita “arte demoniaca dei veleni sottili e silenziosi” (Djalma Juretigh 1932).
  • Gradivo Za Historično Topografijo Predjožefinskih Župnij Na Slovenskem: Kranjska

    Gradivo Za Historično Topografijo Predjožefinskih Župnij Na Slovenskem: Kranjska

    Janez Höfler Gradivo za historično topografijo predjožefinskih župnij na Slovenskem: Kranjska Janez Höfler Gradivo za historično topografijo predjožefinskih župnij na Slovenskem: Kranjska Ljubljana 2017 Janez Höfler Gradivo za historično topografijo predjožefinskih župnij na Slovenskem: Kranjska Oblikovanje ovitka: Barbara Bogataj Kokalj Založnik: Viharnik d.o.o., Ljubljana Za založbo: Urška Pipan © Janez Höfler © Viharnik d.o.o., Ljubljana Ljubljana, 2017 Druga, revidirana in dopolnjena izdaja Elektronska knjiga http://www.viharnik.com/downloads/HistTop_Kranjska2.pdf Kataložni zapis o publikaciji (CIP) pripravili v Narodni in univerzitetni knjižnici v Ljubljani COBISS.SI-ID=291693056 ISBN 978-961-7004-05-2 (pdf) Janez Höfler Gradivo za historično topografijo predjožefinskih župnij na Slovenskem: Kranjska Druga, revidirana in dopolnjena izdaja Ljubljana 2015 3 VSEBINA Pojasnilo Uvod Okrajšave 1. Okrajšave nahajališč virov 2. Okrajšave virov 3. Okrajšave objav virov, periodike in citirane literature 4. Kronološki popis večkrat citiranih virov sistematičnega značaja Shema podatkov po posameznih točkah v gradivu Gradivo I. Župnija Marijinega vnebovzetja v Kranjski Gori II. Župnija sv. Mihaela v Dovjem III. Župnija sv. Lenarta na Jesenicah IV. Župnija sv. Petra v Radovljici V. Župnija sv. Janeza Krstnika v Zasipu VI. Župnija sv. Jurija v Zgornjih Gorjah VII. Župnija sv. Martina na Bledu (Grad) VIII. Župnija sv. Martina v Bohinju (Srednja vas) IX. Župnija sv. Andreja v Mošnjah X. Župnija sv. Lenarta v Kropi XI. Župnija sv. Martina v Šmartinu pri Kranju XII. Župnija sv. Jakoba v Podbrezjah XIII. Župnija Sv. Križa v Križah XIV. Župnija sv. Petra v Naklem XV. Župnija sv. Petra v Preddvoru XVI. Župnija sv. Kancijana in tov. v Kranju XVII. Župnija sv.