Spanish Relations with the Apache Nations East of the Rio Grande

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spanish Relations with the Apache Nations East of the Rio Grande SPANISH RELATIONS WITH THE APACHE NATIONS EAST OF THE RIO GRANDE Jeffrey D. Carlisle, B.S., M.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2001 APPROVED: Donald Chipman, Major Professor William Kamman, Committee Member Richard Lowe, Committee Member Marilyn Morris, Committee Member F. Todd Smith, Committee Member Andy Schoolmaster, Committee Member Richard Golden, Chair of the Department of History C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Carlisle, Jeffrey D., Spanish Relations with the Apache Nations East of the Río Grande. Doctor of Philosophy (History), May 2001, 391 pp., bibliography, 206 titles. This dissertation is a study of the Eastern Apache nations and their struggle to survive with their culture intact against numerous enemies intent on destroying them. It is a synthesis of published secondary and primary materials, supported with archival materials, primarily from the Béxar Archives. The Apaches living on the plains have suffered from a lack of a good comprehensive study, even though they played an important role in hindering Spanish expansion in the American Southwest. When the Spanish first encountered the Apaches they were living peacefully on the plains, although they occasionally raided nearby tribes. When the Spanish began settling in the Southwest they changed the dynamics of the region by introducing horses. The Apaches quickly adopted the animals into their culture and used them to dominate their neighbors. Apache power declined in the eighteenth century when their Caddoan enemies acquired guns from the French, and the powerful Comanches gained access to horses and began invading northern Apache territory. Surrounded by enemies, the Apaches increasingly turned to the Spanish for aid and protection rather than trade. The Spanish-Apache peace was fraught with problems. The Spaniards tended to lump all Apaches into one group even though, in reality, each band operated independently. Thus, when one Apache band raided a Spanish outpost, the Spanish considered the peace broken. On the other hand, since Apaches considered each Spanish settlement a distinct "band" they saw nothing wrong in making peace at one Spanish location while continuing to raid another. Eventually the Spanish encouraged other Indians tribes to launch a campaign of unrelenting war against the Apaches. Despite devastating attacks from their enemies, the Apaches were able to survive. When the Mexican Revolution removed the Spanish from the area, the Apaches remained and still occupied portions of the plains as late as the 1870s. Despite the pressures brought to bear upon them the Apaches prevailed, retaining their freedoms longer than almost any other tribe. CHAPTER I THE APACHE PEOPLE The following description of Apache culture is by no means complete. Rather, it is an attempt to give more understanding to a people who have long been misunderstood. Compared to European culture or American culture, the Apache culture is vastly different. It is not necessarily better or worse, it is not more or less civilized, it is simply different. Therefore it is important to be aware of these differences when telling the history of these people. Many historians fall into the trap of trying to interpret a foreign culture by judging it by the standards of their own- -usually seeing the foreign culture as inferior and therefore despicable. Other historians take a self-loathing attitude, seeing their own culture as objectionable, while trying to make the foreign ethnic group the perfect interpretation of life. Both of these approaches fail to recognize the fact that there is no perfect society. Every society has its strengths and weaknesses, and each one has its successes and failures. This work is an attempt to give a fair interpretation to a people who have for the most part been not only feared and hated throughout most of their history but also admired for their resistance in the face of 1 overwhelming odds. If, by reading this chapter, the reader is given pause to reconsider his/her original opinion of the Apaches, then the writer has accomplished his task. The Apaches are perhaps the most recognizable tribe of Native American Indians. John R. Swanton suggests that this is because of (1) their warlike character; (2) their constant depredations along the Spanish, Mexican, and American frontiers; and (3) the difficulty of forcing them to give up their life style and accept reservation life.1 In any case their notoriety has attracted the attention of scholars and non-scholars alike. Multitudes of works have been written concerning the Apaches, but the vast majority focuses on the American period, especially the exploits of such great Apache leaders as Victorio, Cochise, and Geronimo. These works also concentrate on the western Apache at the expense of slighting those to the east. On the other hand, the eastern Apaches of the prairies and plains have been virtually ignored by comparison. This neglect is strange considering the importance of these natives on the history of the Southwest. The Apaches of the plains are one of the major reasons that the Spanish Empire, and later the Mexican Empire, did not extend farther than they did. Still later their alliance with the AngloAmericans moving into Texas proved to be invaluable in the Texan's struggle for independence and later statehood. It seems, 2 that despite their importance, only one book deals exclusively with the so-called plains Apaches, and it leaves much to be desired.2 The present work is an attempt to rectify that neglect. The term "plains Apaches" is perhaps a misnomer, for none of the Apaches lived a true plains Indian life style, with the possible exception of the Kiowa-Apaches. The Apaches are members of the Athapaskan linguistic group, which is one of the larger language groups with speakers residing from Alaska and Canada in the north to the southwestern United States and northern Mexico to the south. The Apaches, along with the Navajos, who are almost always considered a distinct tribe, make up the southern division of the Athapaskan family. The Apache proper consists of six divisions: the Western (San Carlos) Apaches, the Chiricahua Apaches, the Mescalero Apaches, the Jicarilla Apaches, the Lipan Apaches, and the Kiowa Apaches. Harry Hoijer divides the southern Athapaskans into eastern and western groups based upon linguistic differences. The western group consists of the Navajos and the San Carlos-Chiricahua-Mescalero, while the Eastern Group consists of the Jicarilla-Lipan and Kiowa Apache--with the Jicarillas and Lipans having more in common with each other than with the Kiowa Apaches.3 Most other 3 4 scholars have accepted this division on linguistic as well as cultural differences. This study will concentrate on the Apaches of the plains and its periphery. In this context, the term plains Apaches refers to those Indians who spent at least part of their annual migratory pattern on the plains. Therefore, the Lipans, Jicarillas, and Mescaleros will play major roles. The Kiowa Apaches will be excluded because of their remoteness from other Apache groups, as will the Western Apaches and the Chiricahuas, who had virtually no contact with the plains. During the height of their expansion the plains Apaches inhabited the plains regions including parts of eastern New Mexico and Colorado, western Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. In historic times the Lipan Apaches roamed the area from the upper Nueces and Medina Rivers to the upper Red and Colorado Rivers. By the last quarter of the eighteenth century, they had been forced south by their nemesis, the Comanches, and were ranging on both sides of the Rio Grande. At this time they had to be satisfied with marginal lands along the Great River and extended southward into Coahuila and Chihuahua, although portions of the tribe continued to camp in the vicinity of the Nueces and Guadalupe Rivers.4 The Jicarillas occupied the mountainous region of southern Colorado and northeast New Mexico. They ranged into 5 the plains of western Kansas and Oklahoma and into northwest Texas.5 They generally camped between modern Albuquerque, Chama, and Colorado Springs on the west to western Texas and Oklahoma in the east. According to their legends, the Creator gave them the lands bounded by their sacred Rivers: the Arkansas, the Canadian, the Rio Grande, and the Pecos.6 The Mescaleros operated in an area bounded by the Hondo River in the east, to Santa Fe in the north, to the Rio Grande in the west, and to Coahuila and Chihuahua in the south. Their favorite haunts were the Sacramento, Guadalupe, and San Andreas Mountain ranges. They also inhabited the Sierra Blanca and Davis Mountains. They, like all Apaches, were mountain people who were never completely comfortable on the plains. They usually wintered on the Rio Grande or further south and traveled out to the buffalo plains in the summer, sometimes as far as the Texas Panhandle.7 A major problem in dealing with the Apache Indians is the confusion of names given them. These Indians, of course, had no written language and so almost all information that concerns them was related by Europeans or Americans, who were more often than not their enemies. Even the name "Apache" was not their own. In fact, the French used the word to apply to the worst of robbers and assassins.8 The name "Apache" was first used by Juan de Oñate, colonizer of New Mexico, in 1598. Frederick Hodge suggests 6 that the term originated from "ápachu," the Zuñi word for "enemy."9 This is the most commonly accepted interpretation--perhaps for no other reason than that it seems to be most fitting, for throughout the historic period, the Apaches seemed to have been surrounded by enemies.
Recommended publications
  • The Lone Star State
    Texas: The Lone Star State By Cynthia A. Malecki "Texas, Our Texas! All hail the mighty State! Texas, Our Texas! So wonderful, so great! Boldest and grandest, withstanding ev'ry test, Empire wide and glorious, you stand supremely blest." 1st stanza of the Texas state song They say that everything is big in Texas–big farms, big ranches, big cities, big money, and even big hair. Texas is the biggest of the 48 contiguous U.S. states, with 267,277 square miles (692,244 square km), which is bigger than the 14 smallest states combined.(1) It is approximately 850 miles (1,370 km) from north to south and from west to east. The biggest ranch in Texas is The King Ranch in Kingsville, which is larger than the state of Rhode Island. The cities of Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio are among the nation's ten largest. The Port of Houston handles more foreign cargo than any other U.S. port. Texas is the second largest producer of electronic components in the U.S. and the nation's second leading exporter. Worldwide television viewers might remember the TV show "Dallas" featuring the Ewing family who lived on the South Fork Ranch in Dallas, Texas. Weekly shows featured the extravagant lifestyle of oil barons and their wives with big hair. (Usually found in the southern United States, big hair is the result of combing the hair and spraying it to produce a hairstyle puffed up two or three times its normal volume and capable of withstanding even the strongest winds.) Former Texas governor Ann Richards even declared an official Texas Big Hair Day in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • An Environmental History of the Middle Rio Grande Basin
    United States Department of From the Rio to the Sierra: Agriculture Forest Service An Environmental History of Rocky Mountain Research Station the Middle Rio Grande Basin Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-5 Dan Scurlock i Scurlock, Dan. 1998. From the rio to the sierra: An environmental history of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-5. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 440 p. Abstract Various human groups have greatly affected the processes and evolution of Middle Rio Grande Basin ecosystems, especially riparian zones, from A.D. 1540 to the present. Overgrazing, clear-cutting, irrigation farming, fire suppression, intensive hunting, and introduction of exotic plants have combined with droughts and floods to bring about environmental and associated cultural changes in the Basin. As a result of these changes, public laws were passed and agencies created to rectify or mitigate various environmental problems in the region. Although restoration and remedial programs have improved the overall “health” of Basin ecosystems, most old and new environmental problems persist. Keywords: environmental impact, environmental history, historic climate, historic fauna, historic flora, Rio Grande Publisher’s Note The opinions and recommendations expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA Forest Service. Mention of trade names does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The author withheld diacritical marks from the Spanish words in text for consistency with English punctuation. Publisher Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins, Colorado May 1998 You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonkawa Indians Before the Time of the Spanish Explorers, Native Americans Inhabited the Open Ranges and Woodlands of Texas
    Tonkawa Indians Before the time of the Spanish explorers, Native Americans inhabited the open ranges and woodlands of Texas. One group that made its mark in history is the Tonkawa Indians. These people were thought to have come to Texas as early as the seventeenth century. Tonkawa, a Waco Indian word, means, “they all stay together,” which eloquently describes this group of nomadic Indian tribes. There is scant archeological evidence of the Tonkawa people, and historians have several theories on the tribal structure and lifestyles of this group. Some believe the Tonkawa were actually a group of independent bands of Indians, which may have included the Sana, Toho, Tohaha, Cantona, and Cava Indians. In the early eighteenth century these bands of Indians were thought to have joined together to form Tonkawa Proper. There is some evidence that the Tonkawa actually came to Texas much earlier as one cohesive group of Tonkawa Indians that lived further north. These nomadic hunters lived in tepees made from buffalo hide, grass and other materials. Tepees allowed bands to easily pack their homes and move with the migrating herds of buffalo or to outrun their enemies. An elected tribal chief led each band of Tonkawa, and each band was composed of maternal clans. Unlike many societies that are patriarchal, the Tonkawa clan membership followed on the side of the mother. When a couple got married, the man would go live with his wife’s clan, and the children would become members of their mother’s clan as well. As a society that always stays together, the Tonkawa established a system that ensured all widows, widowers, and orphaned children were taken care of if their family members died.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico New Mexico
    NEW MEXICO NEWand MEXICO the PIMERIA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves NEW MEXICO AND THE PIMERÍA ALTA NEWand MEXICO thePI MERÍA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves UNIVERSITY PRESS OF COLORADO Boulder © 2017 by University Press of Colorado Published by University Press of Colorado 5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C Boulder, Colorado 80303 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The University Press of Colorado is a proud member of Association of American University Presses. The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State University, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Regis University, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, Utah State University, and Western State Colorado University. ∞ This paper meets the requirements of the ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). ISBN: 978-1-60732-573-4 (cloth) ISBN: 978-1-60732-574-1 (ebook) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Douglass, John G., 1968– editor. | Graves, William M., editor. Title: New Mexico and the Pimería Alta : the colonial period in the American Southwest / edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves. Description: Boulder : University Press of Colorado, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016044391| ISBN 9781607325734 (cloth) | ISBN 9781607325741 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Spaniards—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History. | Spaniards—Southwest, New—History. | Indians of North America—First contact with Europeans—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the United States' Spanish Heritage
    Mintz: African American Voices 9781405182607_4_001 Final Proof page 19 17.12.2008 6:15pm Compositor Name: KKavitha Chapter 1 The United States’ Spanish Heritage When Anglo-Americans ventured westward, they did not enter uninhabited land. The region had been settled for hundreds of years. Before the South- west belonged to the United States, it was Indian and Spanish, and after that Mexican. It was Spain that had initially brought Europe to the US’s southern and western half, from the Florida Keys to Alaska. Spain’s north- ern empire included not only Florida and the Great Southwest, but also areas in the deep South and lower Midwest. Spain, for example, founded towns that would eventually become Memphis, Tennessee, and Vicksburg, Mississippi. Spain considered the frontier north of Mexico as a relatively unimportant part of its New World empire. Spanish objectives in the northern frontier were twofold: to convert the Indians to Catholicism and to serve as a buffer to protect wealthier areas of central Mexico. In recent years, there has been a tendency to belittle Spain’s impact on the Southwest, even though it exercised sovereignty over the region for three centuries. Conflict with Indians and the failure to find major silver or gold deposits made it difficult to persuade settlers to colonize the region. Spanish settlement was largely confined to religious missions, a few small civilian towns, and military posts intended to prevent encroachment by Russia, France, and England. It was not until 1749 that Spain established the first civilian town in Texas, a town that eventually became Laredo; and not until 1769 did Spain establish permanent settlements in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans, the California Missions, and the Long-Term Effects of Colonization
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Library Diversity Fellows Publications Student Scholarship 5-2019 Native Americans, the California Missions, and the Long-Term Effects of Colonization Jasminder Bains Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/diversity_fellowship Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bains, Jasminder, "Native Americans, the California Missions, and the Long-Term Effects of Colonization" (2019). Library Diversity Fellows Publications. 1. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/diversity_fellowship/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Diversity Fellows Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Native Americans, the California Missions, and the Long-Term Effects of Colonization By Jasminder Bains With contributions from Alan Leventhal, MA San Jose State University, Department of Anthropology Muwekma Ohlone Tribal Archaeologist and Ethnohistorian And Nadia Nasr, MLIS Head of Archives & Special Collections Santa Clara University Preface The purpose of this essay is to finally acknowledge the atrocities the Native Americans faced at Mission Santa Clara throughout the California Mission period and how the long-term repercussions still affect Native Americans in California and the greater United States today. Too often, this part of history
    [Show full text]
  • NEW MEXICO, SANTA FE New Mexico State Records Center And
    Guide to Catholic-Related Records in the West about Native Americans See User Guide for help on interpreting entries NEW MEXICO, SANTA FE new 2006 New Mexico State Records Center and Archives W-382 1205 Camino Carlos Rey Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507 Phone 505-476-7948 http://www.nmcpr.state.nm.us/ Online Archive of New Mexico, http://elibrary.unm.edu/oanm/ Hours: Monday-Friday, 8:00-4:45 Access: Some restrictions apply Copying facilities: Yes Holdings of Catholic-related records about Native Americans: Inclusive dates: 1598-present; n.d. Volume: 1-2 cubic feet Description: 26 collections include Native Catholic records. /1 “Valentin Armijo Collection, 1960-002” Inclusive dates: Between 1831-1883 Volume: Less than .2 cubic foot Description: Papers (copies) of Valentin Armijo; includes the Catholic Church in Peña Blanca, New Mexico. /2 “Alice Scoville Barry Collection of Historical Documents, 1959-016” Inclusive dates: 1791, 1799, 1826 Volume: 3 folders Description: Finding aid online, http://elibrary.unm.edu/oanm/; includes: a. “Letter Comandante General Pedro de Nava, Chihuahua, to Governor of New Mexico Fernando de la Concha,” July 26, 1791, 1 letter: re: death of Father Francisco Martin-Bueno, O.F.M., the scarcity of ministers, and the substitution of Fray Francisco Ocio, O.F.M. to administer to the Pueblos of Pecos and Tesuque b. “Letter from Comandante General Pedro de Nava, Chihuahua, to governor of New Mexico,” August 6, 1799, 1 letter: re: religion c. “Letter from Baltazar Perea, Bernalillo, to the Gefe Politico y Militar [Governor],” July 2, 1826, 1 letter: re: construction of a chapel at Bernalillo /3 “Fray Angelico Chavez Collection of New Mexico Historical Documents, 1960- 007” Inclusive dates: 1678-1913 (bulk, 1689-1811) Volume: Approximately .3 cubic foot 1 Description: Includes the missions at Zuni Pueblo, San Ildefonso Pueblo, Laguna Pueblo, and Santa Cruz, New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Biografía De Fray Juan De Torquemada
    BIOGRAFÍA DE FRAY JUAN DE TORQUEMADA MIGUEL LEÓN-PORTILLA OS NO MUY NUMEROSOS INVESTIGADORES QUE se han ocu­ pado con cierto detenimiento de la obra de Torquemada coinciden en reconocer que sigue echándose de menos una adecuada biografía de éste. La explicación que aducen de tal carencia es la relativa pobreza de noticias acerca de la vida de fray Juan en las fuentes al alcance. Así, buscando apoyo en lo que sobre Torquemada escribieron estu­ diosos como Mariano Beristáin de Souza, José Fernando Ramírez, Joaquín García Icazba1ceta, Hubert H. Bancroft y Luis González Obregón,l se han reiterado varias veces los mismos testimonios citados por ellos y aun hipótesis muy parecidas a las que dichos autores se forjaron para esclarecer lo que a punto fijo no se ha podido precisar. Por mi· parte no me ufano de haber reunido testimonios capaces de iluminar cabalmente la persona y la actuación de Torquemada. Pienso, sin embargo que, examinando con más detenimiento las fuen­ tes ya antes conocidas y otras hasta ahora no tomadas en cuenta y que he podido reunir, resulta posible intentar una nueva forma de acercamiento a lo más sobresaliente en la vida de nuestro autor. Con­ sidero, por tanto, necesario -antes de ofrecer este esquema biográfico acerca de Torquemada- enumerar y valorar cuáles son los testimo­ nios primarios que, en este trabajo, habrán de servirnos de base. 1 José Mariano Beristáin de Souza, Biblioteca Hispano-americana septentrional, 5 V., México, Fuente Cultural, 1947, t. 5, p. 37-38. José Fernando Ramfrez, "Fray Juan de Torquemada", Obras, México, Biblioteca de autores mexicanos, Imprenta.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Comanche Historical Ethnography And
    Chapter 7 Comanche Historical Ethnography and Ethnohistory ______________________________________________________ 7.1 Introduction The earliest mention of the Comanche in the historical record date to 1706. Comanche ethnogenesis took place about two centuries earlier, after their separation from the Shoshone near the Wind River region. In a step-wise migration bands left the parent society and moved south along the eastern flank of the Rocky Mountains. Initially Comanche bands inhabited the central plains along the Platte, Republican, and Arkansas rivers in eastern Colorado. According to numerous scholars, the Comanche quickly transitioned from a Great Basin culture to a Great Plains life way, although the Comanche retained many Great Basin cultural beliefs and practices.1 However seeking greater trade opportunities and horses, along with the rapidly changing political economic conditions, Comanche bands migrated southeast. By the latter part of the eighteenth century the Comanche consolidated their position on the southern Great Plains after a series of territorial and economic conflicts various tribes and the Spanish.2 Strategically employing warfare, treaty negotiations, and alliances the Comanche controlled the region between the Arkansas and Pecos rivers, an area comprising present-day western Texas and Oklahoma, eastern New Mexico, southeast Colorado, and southwest Kansas.3 By 1820 the Comanche occupied primarily the territory south of the Arkansas River, while the Cheyenne and Arapaho occupied the lands north of the river.4 They controlled this region until the reservation period. The Comanche were never a tribe, unified under a centralized political structure. Rather Comanche ethnicity and social unity was based on common cultural traditions, 600 language, history, and political economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Free Public Schools in Texas. 41P
    DOCUMOIT RESUME 4D 126 615 BA 008 558 AUTHOR Holleman, I. Thomas, Jr. TITLE The Development of Free Public Schools inTexas. PUB DATE [13] NOTE 41p.; Not available in hard copy due to marginal legibility of original document EDRS PRICE NF-S0.83 Plus Postage. BC Not Available fromEDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Finance; *Educational History; Elementary Secondary Education; Historical Reviews; Property Taxes; *Public Education; public School Systems; School Funds; State Aid; State Boards of Education; *State Government; *State Legislation; State School District Relationship , IDENTIFIERS *Texas ABSTRACT This paper summarizes the historical foundationsfor the financing and maintenance of Texas'present day school system. This review traces the'history ofTexas public education from the seventeenth century through 1949 when threemajor s9fOol reorganization laws were enacted by thestate legiilature.'The earliest schools in Texaswere associated with the Spanish missions and were-intended to educate (and control)'the Indians. Education suffered under the Mexican regime, which failedto provide fonds for schools. The Republic of Texas setup a public school system based on: land grants to counties. This funding approachwas later employed when Texas entered the Union, and continued untilthe Civil War brought havoc to public education. However, afterReconstruction, the ( 1875 state constitution provided fora perpetual school fund based on property and poll taxes as wellas for a state board of education. Independent school districts emerged. Finally in1949, the state legislature mandated that 12years of schooling for all children are mandatory and gave the state board of educationHmorepdwer. (DS) *******41414141************************41414141**4141414141***444141*****************- Documents Acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * * materials not available from othersources.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • Symbol of Conquest, Alliance, and Hegemony
    SYMBOL OF CONQUEST, ALLIANCE, AND HEGEMONY: THE IMAGE OF THE CROSS IN COLONIAL MEXICO by ZACHARY WINGERD Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON August 2008 Copyright © by Zachary Wingerd 2008 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I offer thanks to Dr. Dennis Reinhartz, Dr. Kenneth Philp, Dr. Richard Francaviglia, and Dr. Joseph Bastien who agreed to sit on my dissertation committee and guide my research and writing. Special thanks are given to Dr. Douglas Richmond who encouraged my topic from the very beginning and as the committee chair actively supported my endeavor. May 1, 2008 iii DEDICATED TO MY LOVING WIFE AND SONS Lindsey, Josh, and Jamie iv ABSTRACT SYMBOL OF CONQUEST, ALLIANCE, AND HEGEMONY: THE IMAGE OF THE CROSS IN COLONIAL MEXICO Zachary Wingerd, PhD. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2008 Supervising Professor: Douglas Richmond The universality of the cross image within the transatlantic confrontation meant not only a hegemony of culture, but of symbolism. The symbol of the cross existed in both European and American societies hundreds of years before Columbus. In both cultures, the cross was integral in religious ceremony, priestly decoration, and cosmic maps. As a symbol of life and death, of human and divine suffering, of religious and political acquiescence, no other image in transatlantic history has held such a perennial, powerful message as the cross. For colonial Mexico, which felt the brunt of Spanish initiative, the symbol of the cross penetrated the autochthonous culture out of which the independent nation and indigenous church were born.
    [Show full text]