DOCSLIB.ORG

Existentialism in Notes from the Underground Through the Lens of Gita’S Philosophical Discourse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Existentialism in Notes from the Underground Through the Lens of Gita’S Philosophical Discourse © 2019 JETIR March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Existentialism in Notes from the Underground through the Lens of Gita’s Philosophical Discourse *Mudita Choudhary Student, M.A. (Eng.) The IIS University, Jaipur **Dr Sucharita Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of English The IIS University , Jaipur Abstract Existentialism is an incredible aspect because of its intrinsic aspect in solving the fundamental human problem. Its applicability has gone beyond the era, time, space and culture. The article explores the work of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground through the existential discourse of Sartre, dealing with the shaken existence of an individual who is very intricately characterized. The research is an endeavor to trace the long existing tussle amidst human perceptions and actions. The world that is weaved in the text projects a very universal frame of human conscious. The characters are endowed with a wide array of scope to understand the man’s self crafted illusionary trap, and this trap is displayed in the cognitive conflict of man’s internal and external world. This research also attempts to find evidences of existential ideas in Indian classical texts like Bhagvad Gita, exploring the dispute of ‘existence’ and ‘being’ vis-à-vis the Philosophical approach of Gita in projecting a wide spectrum of human psychology with their multiple nature and needs to attain the ultimate ‘freedom to choose’. Keywords: Existential, Self - Deception, Conflict, Action, Freedom People say that we are all seeking is the meaning of life…I think what we are really seeking is the experience of being alive - Rudyard Kipling Existentialism was never a single specific doctrine. Its meaning kept on changing with the time and the list of much diverse existentialists kept on emerging. Therefore “ There was no single voice of authority, its definition has always had blurry edges .It grew up in the public domain, as a drawing of a new way of thinking about life that emerged at a particular moment in history. It could be seen as a historical necessity or inevitability, an effort to adapt to a new confluence of cultural and historical forces” (Cogswell, 1). Existential views helped in expanding man’s vision and his views of the universe. Discoveries, scientific explorations opened new vistas in people’s life and gradually the old biblical view that God JETIR1903169 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 421 © 2019 JETIR March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) created world in six days shattered as people gradually realized that earth had a long history to munch upon. Therefore a more realistic approach was needed that could accommodate with the expanding universe. But even with the increase in scientific probe, people exercised power over the material world. Man surely became powerful but not as powerful to control the catastrophic destructions of his own over ambitions. “Even science, with its cold objectivity lacked the human dimension, so it failed as an all-encompassing belief system that could guide human judgment and actions.” (Cogswell, 5) Fyodor Dostoevsky, Russian novelist, emerged in nineteenth century, much before his contemporaries perceived the calamities the world was about to suffer due to their “naïve belief in a coming technological Utopia.” (Cogswell, 28) Dostoevsky in his works portrayed the classic problems of existentialism. For instance Notes from the Underground deals with an existential point of view, “beginning with the unreliability of reason.” However man is allured with logic and rationality, Dostoevsky claims that originally man is not a logical creature he rather believed that what triggers man’s choice, is not just most “advantageous advantage” but a “freewill” as his choices are not always guided alone from his rational side but also is a manifestation of his impulses and desires. He says “and how these wiseacres know that man wants a normal, a virtuous choice? What has made them conceive that man must want a rationally advantageous choice? What man wants is simply independent choice, whatever that independence may cost and wherever it may lead” (Cogswell, 30) His novella Notes from the Underground likewise wrangles with the most fundamental existential framework of Sartre i.e. “the world is founded upon the absurd”. Dostoevsky’s novella can be regarded as definitive voice of existential beliefs. In Notes from the Underground the protagonist consistently and repeatedly deals with inner conflicts, self contradictions, self pity which engrosses his mind so rigorously that his life becomes an embodiment of an unknown suffering. The work openly declares the paradox of human mind. Underground man exists without any sort of sanctuary and refuge from the pain and agony of modern consciousness alongside Eliot’s ‘Prufrock’, Shakespeare’s Hamlet and so on. He addresses the world from that crack; he has also spent a lifetime listening at it. Everything that can be said about him, and more particularly against him, he already knows; he has, as he says in a typical paradox, overheard it all, anticipated it all, invented it all. “I am a sick man….I am a wicked man.” In the space of that pause Dostoevsky introduces the unifying idea of his tale: the instability, the perpetual “dialectic” of isolated consciousness. (Dostoevsky, ix) The novella is known for its absurd narrative, unorganized framework and a general sense of disdain which runs through it. It is majorly divided into two major parts. Part one contains no plot and deals with an JETIR1903169 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 422 © 2019 JETIR March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) unending chaotic philosophical pondering and descriptions of surrounding. Part second however deals with his failure or incapability of forming meaningful relationships. Underground man’s interaction to people gives him joy but at the same time tear him down, which is why he chooses to be underground. The work is an unorganized memoir of an unknown narrator, who throughout the novel has been called as ‘Underground man’ whose logic is twisted and often contradictory. A man who concludes, that the universe is without any reason. Underground man is an aggressive, conflicted and indecisive man living alone in St. Petersburg, Russia, in the 1860s. He is a Russian civil servant who has recently retired as he has inherited money out of a will. The novella consists of the confused, contradictory statements and confessions of his detachment from the society. It is an epitome of modern tragedy; and efficiently put up to the fore, it is an absurd destruction of human self and life in its totality. His inability to act generates from several important factors working together. First, the Underground Man is suffering from a major existential crisis, he thinks that nothing in the world can provide his life any meaning, and in fact there is no meaning in trying. He believes that traditional social values have no basis and that human existence is essentially useless. As a result the Underground Man detests the society he is living in. He is filled with bitterness and hatred toward all aspects of society, but he is aware that he is powerless to act against the hypocrisy which lies within it. Man’s sadism, the pleasure he takes in his own pain and humiliation explores the further idea in more depth later in the novel. I am a sick man…I am a wicked man. An unattractive man. I think my liver hurts. However, I don’t know a fig about my sickness, and am not sure what it is that hurts me. I am not being treated and never have been able, though I respect medicine and doctors. What’s more, I am also superstitious in the extreme; well, at least enough to respect medicines. (I am sufficiently educated not to be superstitious, but I am.) No sir, I refuse to be treated out of wickedness. Now, you will certainly not be so good as to understand this. Well, sir, but I understand it. I will not, of course, be able to explain to you precisely who is going to suffer in this case from my wickedness; I know perfectly that I will in no way “muck things up” for the doctors by not taking their treatment; I know better than anyone that by all this I am harming myself and no one else. But still, if I don’t get treated, it is out of wickedness. My liver hurts; well, then let it hurt even worse ( Dostoevsky, 5) The Underground Man has great contempt for prevailing school of thought that attempted to use practical, rational and logical line of thought to cope up with man’s desires and choices.He complains that man’s primary desire and choice is to practice freedom of thought. This explains the reason of Underground Man taking pleasure in his own toothaches and liver pains and he accepts his situation without even questioning the value of going to the doctor. He predicts that man would be bored in a society based on JETIR1903169 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 423 © 2019 JETIR March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) scientifically derived principles for moral behavior, rather, in his views man should overturn this logic and should rely on his own and live according to their own irrational free will. According to him, in any circumstance, a man prefers to think he is acting as he desires to act, not as reason dictates. Thus, the most important thing to man is that his freedom of choice should not be constrained by anything— not even reason.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy
    Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor Dorothy J. Hale Spring 2016 Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy © 2016 By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Abstract Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy by Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation focuses new critical attention on a problem central to the history and theory of the novel, but so far remarkably underexplored: the mimetic illusion that realist characters exist independently from the author’s control, and even from the constraints of form itself. How is this illusion of “life” produced? What conditions maintain it, and at what points does it start to falter? My study investigates the character-systems of three Russian realist novels with widely differing narrative structures — Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1865–1869), and Dostoevsky’s The Adolescent (1875) and The Brothers Karamazov (1879–1880) — that offer rich ground for exploring the sources and limits of mimetic illusion. I suggest, moreover, that Tolstoy and Dostoevsky themselves were preoccupied with this question. Their novels take shape around ambitious projects of characterization that carry them toward the edges of the realist tradition, where the novel begins to give way to other forms of art and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Dostoevsky's Ideal
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2015 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul A. Eppler Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Philosophy Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Eppler, Paul A., "Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man" (2015). Student Publications. 395. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/395 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 395 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Abstract This paper aimed to provide a comprehensive examination of the "ideal" Dostoevsky human being. Through comparison of various characters and concepts found in his texts, a kenotic individual, one who is undifferentiated in their love for all of God's creation, was found to be the ultimate to which Dostoevsky believed man could ascend. Keywords Dostoevsky, Christianity, Kenoticism Disciplines Philosophy Comments This paper was written for Professor Vernon Cisney's course, PHIL 368: Reading- Dostoevsky, Fall 2015. This student research paper is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ student_scholarship/395 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul Eppler Professor Vernon Cisney Reading Dostoevsky I affirm that I have upheld the highest principles of honesty and integrity in my academic work and have not witnessed a violation of the Honor Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzschean Types in the Brothers Karamazov ​ 139817 –Dr
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Patrick Durkin Nietzschean Types in The Brothers Karamazov ​ 139817 –Dr. William Angus th 11 ​ February 2019 ​ For the Masters of Arts, English Durkin 1 Abstract Nietzsche and Dostoevsky were contemporaries, and Nietzsche especially was known to admire Dostoevsky’s work. Both authors were interested in the study of the basis for human morality, and the search for a redirection of human morality; one in which the problems they saw with the current understanding of acceptable behaviour according to laws, religion and might is right, could be melded in with their own beliefs and struggles with their own mortality and morality. Although Nietzsche’s collection of essays The Genealogy of Morals, (1887) was ​ ​ written 7 years after Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov (1880), it is interesting to ​ ​ note that the main character types that Nietzsche believed created hierarchies that developed and sustained the morality of his time, appear in the form of the main characters in The Brothers Karamazov. ​ ​ This thesis will be looking at the The Brothers Karamazov through the different ​ ​ character ‘types’ and the resulting psychomachia of the three legitimate brothers, the older brothers Dmitri and Ivan, and especially that of Alyosha, the youngest brother. The thesis will focus on both elder brothers’ evolution of thought and action through the progress of the novel, and, importantly, on each brothers’ interactions with Alyosha and the turbulent state of mind they regularly leave their younger sibling in.
    [Show full text]
  • King-Salter2020.Pdf (1.693Mb)
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Dostoevsky’s Storm and Stress Notes from Underground and the Psychological Foundations of Utopia John Luke King-Salter PhD Comparative Literature University of Edinburgh 2019 Lay Summary The goal of this dissertation is to combine philosophical and literary scholarship to arrive at a new interpretation of Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground. In this novel, Dostoevsky argues against the Russian socialists of the early 1860s, and attacks their ideal of a socialist utopia in particular. Dostoevsky’s argument is obscure and difficult to understand, but it seems to depend upon the way he understands the interaction between psychology and politics, or, in other words, the way in which he thinks the health of a society depends upon the psychological health of its members. It is usually thought that Dostoevsky’s problem with socialism is that it curtails individual liber- ties to an unacceptable degree, and that the citizens of a socialist utopia would be frustrated by the lack of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cases of Venedikt Erofeev, Kurt Vonnegut, and Victor Pelevin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Western Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-21-2012 12:00 AM Burying Dystopia: the Cases of Venedikt Erofeev, Kurt Vonnegut, and Victor Pelevin Natalya Domina The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Professor Calin-Andrei Mihailescu The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Comparative Literature A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Natalya Domina 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Domina, Natalya, "Burying Dystopia: the Cases of Venedikt Erofeev, Kurt Vonnegut, and Victor Pelevin" (2012). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 834. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/834 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BURYING DYSTOPIA: THE CASES OF VENEDIKT EROFEEV, KURT VONNEGUT, AND VICTOR PELEVIN (Spine Title: BURYING DYSTOPIA) (Thesis Format: Monograph) by Natalya Domina Graduate Program in Comparative Literature A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Natalya Domina 2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO SCHOOL OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Supervisor Examiners ____________________________ ________________________________ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Beckett and Fyodor Dostoevsky
    Metaphysical Comedy: Samuel Beckett and Fyodor Dostoevsky PhD English Literature Ekaterina Gosteva May 2019 I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the connection between Beckett’s comedy and Dostoevsky’s novels in the light of René Girard’s theory of metaphysical desire. While focusing on Beckett’s prose of the 1930s, this study begins with the typology of laughter in Watt. ​ ​ With the help of this passage (employed as a critical tool), the subject of Beckett’s comedy is preliminarily defined as ‘The Unhappy Consciousness’. In Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, this term is stated with regards to the functions of laughter ​ as a negative response to a threat from a hostile phenomenal world. ‘The risus purus’, which Beckett celebrates as ‘the laugh of laughs’, reveals itself as a satirical attack at Kant’s rational cosmology and Hegel’s phenomenology. A further investigation into this structure provides a link between the genre of comedy in general, Beckett’s comic form and Girard’s theory of mimetic desire, based on the works of Cervantes, Flaubert, Stendhal, Proust and Dostoevsky. The works of these novelists allowed René Girard to articulate a concrete theorization of desire, which binds together literary and anthropological questions. Beckett’s engagement with Dostoevsky remains a blind spot in Beckett studies. Although as early as Proust, Beckett attempted to link Proust and Dostoevsky as the ​ ​ writers whose technique he defined as ‘negative and comic’, the scarcity of his critical comments on Dostoevsky has been an obstacle for scholars trying to identify and analyse their relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Resurrection from the Underground: Feodor
    RESURRECTION FROM THE UNDERGROUND: FEODOR DOSTOEVSKY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Andrew B Hammond Professor of French Language Literature and Civilization Rene Girard,James G Williams | 120 pages | 15 Feb 2012 | Michigan State University Press | 9781611860375 | English | East Lansing, MI, United States Resurrection from the Underground: Feodor Dostoevsky PDF Book Coming "from above" the Swiss mountains , he physically resembles common depictions of Jesus Christ : slightly larger than average, with thick, blond hair, sunken cheeks and a thin, almost entirely white goatee. Learn More. Important Quotations Explained. On 14 April , they began a delayed honeymoon in Germany with the money gained from the sale. Russian author. Dostoevsky disliked the academy, primarily because of his lack of interest in science, mathematics and military engineering and his preference for drawing and architecture. Ivan, however, has stated that he is against Christ. On the following day, Dostoevsky suffered a pulmonary haemorrhage. The Grand Inquisitor Anthropocentric. Anyone interested in Dostoevsky will profit from grappling with Girard's take. Main article: Poor Folk. Ci tengo a precisare che il saggio - per sua natura - contiene spoiler di tutti i romanzi, ergo andrebbe letto a seguito del recupero dell'opera omnia. XXII, Nos. Some critics, such as Nikolay Dobrolyubov , Ivan Bunin and Vladimir Nabokov , viewed his writing as excessively psychological and philosophical rather than artistic. Resurrection from the Underground: Feodor Dostoevsky pp. Minihan, Michael A. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. LOG IN. Arshad Khan says: Reply December 17, at pm. C-1 Download Save contents. This aspect leads the narrator into doing wrong things. Yale University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • By Fyodor Dostoevsky
    “The Problem of Evil ” by Fyodor Dostoevsky Dostoevsky, (detail) portrait by Vasily Perov, The State Tretyakov Gallery About the author.. The novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881) spent four years in a Siberian prison and four more years in the army as punish- ment for his role in a clandestine Utopian-socialist discussion group. He became scornful of the rise of humanistic science in the West and chron- icled its threat to human freedom. Dostoevsky’s writings challenged the notion of the essential rationality of human beings and anticipated many ideas in existential psychoanalysis. For Dostoevsky, the essence of being human is freedom. About the work. In the The Brothers Karamazov,1 Dostoevsky reveals deep psychological insight into the nature of human morality. In this, his greatest work, he expresses the destructive aspects of human freedom which can only be bound by God. In Chapter 4 of that work, the death of an innocent child is seen to be an inescapable objection to God’s good- ness. In this chapter Alyosha is the religious foil to Ivan, his intellectual older brother. 1. Fyodor Dostoevsky. “Rebellion” in the The Brothers Karamazov (1879). Trans. by Constance Garnett. 1 “The Problem of Evil ” by Fyodor Dostoevsky From the reading. “But then there is the children, and what am I to do about them? That’s a question I can’t answer.” Ideas of Interest from The Brothers Karamazov 1. Why does Ivan think that children are innocent and adults are not? Why does he think we can love children when they are close, but we can only love our neighbor abstractly? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Notes from Underground and the Double 1St
    NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND AND THE DOUBLE 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Fyodor Dostoyevsky | 9780140455120 | | | | | Notes from Underground and the Double 1st edition PDF Book Published by Oxford University Press I have a lot of Dostoyevsky left to explore. The narrator observes that utopian society removes suffering and pain, but man desires both things and needs them to be happy. Halfway through it, the dialogue picked up. Dostoevsky, in a letter to his brother Mikhail at the age of Apropos of the spite, what can I say about Notes from underground? They become friends and the man falls in love with her as she d There were multiple stories in this volume and unless you really like Dostoevsky, you could probably let this one pass. Light edge and corner wear with an uncreased spine; no interior markings. When I heard people say Dostoevsky is difficult to read, I always assumed it might be because of complex language and storyline, or long Russian names that are hard to keep up with. I think I preferred the first part of this text, just because I found it that more interesting in terms of philosophy, yet it still had the witty narration in it. Trade Paperback. Told through first person narrative, this book unearths in my opinion one of the most unlikeable characters I've ever come across - a complete anti-hero. How all these characters interact with each other is however beyond me, and here is where most of my problems with Dostoyevsky lies. Main Ideas Here's where you'll find analysis about the book as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Inquisitor,” Is Told by Ivan Karamazov to His Younger Brother Alyosha
    Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881), author of such works as Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, and The Possessed, is considered by many to be one of the world’s greatest writers, and the novel The Brothers Karamazov is universally recognized to be one of genuine masterpieces of world literature. Within this novel the story, “The Grand Inquisitor,” is told by Ivan Karamazov to his younger brother Alyosha. The two brothers had just been discussing the problem of evil—the classic problem of Christian theology: if God is really all powerful, all knowing, and truly loving, then why does evil exist? If God could not have prevented evil, then he is not all powerful. If evil somehow escapes his awareness, then he is not all knowing. If he knew, and could do something about it, but chose not to, then how can he be considered a loving God? One solution to this problem is to claim that evil does not really exist, that if we were to see the world Portrait of Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1872 from God’s perspective, from the perspective of eternity, then everything comes out well in the end. Another response is to claim that it really isn’t God’s fault at all, it is ours. God gave us free-will and evil is the result of our misuse of that gift. Ivan will have none of these arguments. He brings up the particularly troubling case of the suffering of innocent children—how can they be blamed and punished if they are innocent? Ivan cannot accept that the suffering of an innocent child will be justified in the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Socially Constructed Reality and Meaning in Notes from Underground
    Socially Constructed Reality and Meaning in Notes from Underground Just as the hands in M.C. Escher’s “Drawing Hands” both create and are created by each other, the identity of man and society are mutually interdependent. According to the model described in The Sacred Canopy, Peter Berger believes that man externalizes or creates a social reality that is in turn objectified, or accepted by him as real. This sociological model creates a useful framework for understanding the narrator’s rejection of ultimate reality or truth in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground. The reality in which the narrator tries to live in part II, and the reality that he rejects in part I, are both created and, as such, are ultimately meaningless. The underground man’s refusal to objectify social reality causes a feeling of meaninglessness and raises a fundamental question of purpose that confronts people of all dispositions. Berger’s theory is based on a dialectical relationship between man and society. To explain his theory he defines three terms. “Externalization is the ongoing outpouring of human being into the world. Objectivation, the attainment by the products of this activity of a reality that confronts its original producers as a facticity external to and other than themselves. Internalization is the reappropriation by men of this same reality, transforming into structures of the subjective consciousness,” (Berger 4). He believes that society is a wholly human invention created by man’s tendency to externalize. This created entity is then objectified by man, giving society and its features the appearance of true reality.
    [Show full text]