The Gays' and Lesbians' Rights in an Enlarged European Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Gays' and Lesbians' Rights in an Enlarged European Union The gays’ and lesbians’ rights in an enlarged European Union Edited by Anne Weyembergh, Sinziana Carstocea ISBN 978-2-8004-1367-9 © 2006 by Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles Avenue Paul Héger 26- 1000 Bruxelles (Belgique) [email protected] http://www.editions-ulb.be Imprimé en Belgique Acknowledgements This collective book is the result of a conference held in Brussels in December 2003 under the title: “Les droits des gays et des lesbiennes dans une Union européenne élargie /Gays’ and Lesbians’ Rights in an Enlarged European Union”. Organized by the Legal Department of the European Studies Institute and the GASPPECO (Groupe d’Analyse Socio-Politique des Pays d’Europe Centrale et Orientale) research group of the Université Libre de Bruxelles, this seminar brought together researchers from all over Europe. All of the articles in this collection were submitted for publication prior to May 2005. Several contributions, not only financial, but also collaborative, made the conference and this book possible. We would like to mention here the financial support received from the ULB education authorities, from the Communauté française, from the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), from the Cabinet du Secrétaire d’Etat aux Affaires européennes, and from the Programme Pôles d’attraction interuniversitaire P4/04- Etat belge, Service du Premier ministre – Services fédéraux des affaires scientifiques, techniques et culturelles, du ministère de l’Education, de la Recherche et de la Formation de la Communauté française de Belgique. The editors’ special thanks go to Mr Jean Michel De Waele, Director of the GASPPECO, for without his enthusiasm, his passion for research, his open- mindedness and his savoir-faire this project would not have come to fruition. He strongly believed in our collaborative project and always found good solutions to any problems we encountered. Grateful thanks are also due to Mr Eddy Caekelberghs for the support he offered in organizing the seminar in December, for his élan and his trust. Introduction Anne WEYEMBERGH & Sînziana CÂRSTOCEA A great number of important legal developments in the protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation have recently become apparent at the European Union level. Essential social and legal changes concerning gays and lesbians have also been observed at the national level within Europe. In this regard, the recognition of same-sex partnership in several Member States is quite eloquent. The progress achieved in this field shows the importance taken by the “homosexuality issue” both at the EU level and at the national level of the Member States. This collective book aims at offering a scientific analysis of this impressive evolution. Its purpose is to focus on less known and less studied aspects of the process. Among the principal questions analysed, it is worth mentioning the interactions between the decisions adopted within the EU framework and the changes introduced at the national level. A number of European measures must be implemented in the national legislation of the Member States and of those acceding to Member status. This is especially true for European anti-discriminatory regulations, which have had a harmonizing effect on the States’ national laws. Non-binding texts, such as recommendations, have also had an approximating impact on the Member States’ legislation. However, as most of the contributions show, resistance to the implementation of European guidelines in the area remains quite strong. Another significant issue tackled by the authors is the relationship between the written norms on the one hand and their being put into practice on the other. This is particularly important because a discrepancy between both could question the role of legislation as well as the legislation’s or, more generally, the law’s interaction with society. Most of the contributions in this volume approach these substantive issues through the study of specific cases. These cases are usually related to one field in particular – as, for example, non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or same-sex 10 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 11 partnership – and/or to the specific situation in a given Member State or candidate country. The book is characterized by its international and multidisciplinary nature. The authors, who come from various countries, are lawyers, sociologists, political scientists or journalists. This explains not only the broad spectrum of issues covered but also the various points of view or methods in analysing the cases dealt with. This volume has a three part structure, as follows. The first part brings together contributions related to gays’ and lesbians’ situations in the fifteen Member States of the European Union. A first group of four contributions aim at analysing the legal situation and the improvements accomplished in order to outlaw discriminations on the basis of sexual orientation within the European Union. Kees Waaldijk, senior lecturer at the E. M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies of the Universiteit Leiden, gives an accurate inventory of the existing legislation against sexual orientation discrimination in employment in the fifteen Member States of the European Union. The author concentrates on the implementation of the Directive 2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, which was supposed to be enforced at national level before 2 December 2003. The article offers a detailed overview of the amendments and new legal provisions introduced in the fifteen countries. Three case studies follow regarding France, Sweden and Greece. Daniel Borrillo, senior lecturer at the University of Paris X-Nanterre and associate researcher at CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), makes a survey of the legal situation of gays and lesbians in France. The French situation, as summarized by the author, could read “the individual gets everything, the couple gets only a little and the family gets nothing”. Daniel Borrillo examines legal, historical and sociological aspects of the situation of gay and lesbian people: first the homosexual individual, then the same-sex couple and finally the homo-parental family. Hans Ytterberg, associate judge of appeal and Sweden’s Ombudsman against Discrimination on grounds of Sexual Orientation, presents the development of Swedish law with respect to non-discrimination and sexual orientation. Arguing that the impact of accomplishments at European level on this particular Member State’s legislation has been weaker and more indirect than in several other Member States, the author first gives a general outline of the historical evolution in Sweden. In a second part of his paper, he focuses on a more specific topic, namely the setting up of the Ombudsman Office against Discrimination on grounds of Sexual Orientation, discussing the status both in concept and in practice. The first group of articles closes with the contribution of Matthaios A. Peponas, a lawyer from Athens who offers a short but comprehensive historical overview of the legal evolution in Greece, pointing out the most significant stages of legal development concerning same-sex relationships and anti-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation. Essential elements are emphasized, as, for instance, the influence of religion on the acceptance of homosexuality or the discrepancy between societal norms and law when alternative sexual lifestyles are concerned. The first part of the book then contains a second group of articles, which take a closer look at an issue that has been widely discussed over the last years in Member 10 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 11 States of the European Union: the homosexual couple. Firstly, Frédéric Jörgens, PhD candidate at the European University Institute of Florence, focuses on the tension between law and social norms. He explores the question of the same-sex partnership taking into account the connections between legal recognition, social acceptance and representation of homosexuality. Basing his analysis on interviews made in four main cities of Europe (Paris, London, Berlin and Rome), the author examines the confrontation of the real-life experiences of gays and lesbians with legal options, from a sociological point of view. Moreover, he considers an auxiliary question referring to the possible consequences of the social environment for the construction of individual identities. Secondly, David Paternotte, PhD candidate of the Université Libre de Bruxelles, deals with the process of legal recognition of same-sex couples in Belgium. The main focus here is so-called “inclusion models”, namely the different ways of materializing specific definitions of equality in order to include more fully marginalized social groups into the polity. Adopting a theoretical and abstract approach based on discourse analysis, the author investigates whether the opening-up of civil marriage to same-sex couples constitutes an answer to a claim for equality and/or corresponds to the affirmation of a specific identity. The second part of the volume addresses a less considered problem, namely the situation of sexual minorities in the new Member States. Is there a better place for gays and lesbians? Three different testimonies, realized with different instruments, attempt to provide an answer to this question. In a complex sociological approach to the Slovenian situation, Roman Kuhar, researcher at the Ljubljana Peace Institute, turns his attention to the current legal and political condition
Recommended publications
  • The Survey Statistician
    No. 52 July 2005 In This Issue No. 52, July 2005 No. 52 July 2005 1 Letter from the President 2 Report from the IASS Scientific Secretary 3 IASS Short Courses in Sydney 2005 4 Report on IASS Lisbon 2007 Programme Committee 4 Report from the UNESCO Institute for Statistics 7 Country Reports 7 Australia 8 Canada 8 Hungary 9 Italy 11 Philippines 11 Poland 12 Country Representatives 15 Software Review Editor Steven G. Heeringa 16 Ask the Experts Section Editors 17 Articles John Kovar — Country Reports Letter from G. Theodore James Lepkowski — Software Review Response from Anders Christianson Anders Christianson — “Ask the Experts” 18 New Members Production Editor Gail Arnold 21 Announcements Circulation 21 ICES III Claude Olivier 21 SAE2005 Anne-Marie Vespa-Leyder 23 IASS Web Site The Survey Statistician is published twice a year in English and French by the 24 In Other Journals International Association of Survey 24 Survey Methodology Statisticians and distributed to all its 25 Journal of Official Statistics members. Information for membership in 27 Statistics in Transition the Association or change of address for current members should be addressed to: 29 IASS Officers and Council Members Secrétariat de l’AISE/IASS c/o INSEE-CEFIL Change of Address Form Att. Mme Claude Olivier 3, rue de la Cité Institutional Members 33500 Libourne - FRANCE E-mail: [email protected] Comments on the contents or suggestions for articles in The Survey Statistician should be sent via e-mail to [email protected] or mailed to: Steven Heeringa Institute for Social Research 426 Thompson St., POB 1248 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248 - USA Let me begin my first Survey countries was low, largely due to the Statistician letter to you as withdrawal of expected funding shortly President of IASS by thanking my before the meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • De Ani 15-24
    DE ANI 15-24 MARTIE 2019 12 Festival Internațional de Documentar și Drepturile Omului 15-24 MARTIE 2019 12 Festival Internațional de Documentar și Drepturile Omului CINEMA ELVIRE POPESCO CINEMATECA EFORIE CINEMATECA UNION ARCUB POINT PAVILION 32 INFO & BILETE WWW.ONEWORLD.RO FACEBOOK: ONE.WORLD.ROMANIA ORGANIZATOR / ORGANIZER Asociația One World Romania PARTENER PRINCIPAL / MAIN PARTNER Programul Statul de Drept Europa de Sud Est al Fundației Konrad Adenauer CU SPRIJINUL / WITH THE SUPPORT OF Administrația Fondului Cultural Național, Centrul Național al Cinematografiei, Primăria Capitalei prin ARCUB – Centrul Cultural al Municipiului București, UNHCR – Agenția ONU pentru Refugiați, Reprezentanța Comisiei Eu- ropene în România, Uniunea Cineaștilor din România, DACIN-SARA, Organizația Internațională pentru Migrație, Institutul Cultural Român, Institutul de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului și Memoria Exilului Românesc, Con- siliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării, Agenția de Cooperare Internaționalâ pentru Dezvoltare - RoAid SPONSORI / SPONSORS BOSCH, Aqua Carpatica, Domeniile Sâmburești CINEMA ELVIRE POPESCO PARTENERI / PARTNERS Ambasada Franței în România, Institutul Francez din București, Goethe-Institut București, Ambasada Statelor PARTENERI CINEMATECA EFORIE Unite ale Americii, Ambasada Regatului Țărilor de Jos în România, Forumul Cultural Austriac, Swiss Sponsor’s Fund, Ambasada Elveției în România, British Council, Ambasada Statului Palestina, Centrul Cultural Palestin- CINEMATECA UNION ian “Mahmoud Darwish”, Festivalul
    [Show full text]
  • 21St GA 2006 Minutes
    EUROPEAN UNION OF THE DEAF MINUTES of the 21st General Assembly Meeting 13th-14th May 2006 Vienna, Austria EUD General Assembly 05-06.05.07 Berlin 1 Annex 2 AGENDA 1. WELCOMING ADDRESS ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION OF CHAIR FOR THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY ........................................................ 3 3. INTRODUCTION OF NEW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: MAIREAD O’LEARY ...................................... 3 4. ROLL CALL .......................................................................................................................................... 3 4.1 DELEGATES: ..................................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 OBSERVERS: ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.3 EUD BOARD: .................................................................................................................................... 4 4.4 EUD STAFF: ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.5 INTERPRETERS: ................................................................................................................................. 4 4.6 MEMBERS TO BE VOTED IN: ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines
    Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines Submitted for consideration at the 106 th Session of the Human Rights Committee for the fourth periodic review of the Philippines October 2012 COALITION REPORT Submitted by: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) www.IGLHRC.org LGBT AND HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS: INDIVIDUAL LGBT ACTIVISTS: 1. Babaylanes, Inc. 1. Aleksi Gumela 2. Amnesty International Philippines - LGBT Group (AIPh-LGBT) 2. Alvin Cloyd Dakis 3. Bacolod and Negros Gender Identity Society (BANGIS) 3. Arnel Rostom Deiparine 4. Bisdak Pride – Cebu 4. Bemz Benedito 5. Cagayan De Oro Plus (CDO Plus) 5. Carlos Celdran 6. Changing Lane Women’s Group 6. Ian Carandang 7. Coalition for the Liberation of the Reassigned Sex (COLORS) 7. Mae Emmanuel 8. Elite Men’s Circle (EMC) 8. Marion Cabrera 9. EnGendeRights, Inc. 9. Mina Tenorio 10. Filipino Freethinkers (FF) 10. Neil Garcia 11. Fourlez Women’s Group 11. Raymond Alikpala 12. GAYAC (Gay Achievers Club) 12. Ryan Sylverio 13. KABARO-PUP 13. Santy Layno 14. LADLAD Cagayan De Oro 15. LADLAD Caraga, Inc. 16. LADLAD Europa 17. LADLAD LGBT Party 18. LADLAD Region II 19. Lesbian Activism Project Inc. (LeAP!), Inc. 20. Lesbian Piipinas 21. Link Davao 22. Metropolitan Community Church – Metro Baguio City (MCCMB) 23. Miss Maanyag Gay Organization of Butuan 24. OUT Exclusives Women’s Group 25. OUT Philippines LGBT Group 26. Outrage LGBT Magazine 27. Philippine Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC) 28. Philippine Forum on Sports, Culture, Sexuality and Human Rights (TEAM PILIPINAS) 29. Pink Watch (formerly Philippine LGBT Hate Crime Watch (PLHCW) ) 30.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Breakthrough by the Far Right in Flanders, Victory for The
    PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN BELGIUM 26th May 2019 European Significant breakthrough Elections monitor by the far right in Flanders, victory for the Socialist Party in Corinne Deloy Wallonia and Brussels: Belgium divided more than ever before Results The Belgian general election took place on 26th May revealing a greatly divided country. The far-right made a significant breakthrough in Flanders came first in the election despite a loss of seats: 20[1] in the shape of the Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest, VB), (- 3). It came out ahead of the Reform Movement (MR), a party chaired by Tom Van Grieken. Although the New a liberal party led by outgoing Prime Minister Charles Alliance (N-VA), a nationalist party chaired by Bart de Michel, which recorded a loss of support, winning 14 Wever, is still the region’s leading party with 25 seats, it seats (- 6); Ecolo, a party led co-led by Zakia Khattabi lost some seats however (-8 seats in comparison with the and Jean-Marc Nollet, won 13 seats (+ 7) and the Labour previous parliamentary elections on 25th May 2014) and Party, making strong progress, won 12 seats (+10). failed to rise above the 30% vote threshold. The Vlaams The Humanist Democratic Centre (cDH), led by Maxime Belang came second with 18 seats (+15). Prévot, came fifth (5 MPs, - 4). The Christian Democratic Party (CD&V), led by Wouter In Brussels, the socialists also came out ahead, just in 1. Here the number Beke, came third, but with fewer seats: 12 MPs (-6). front of the French-speaking ecologists who witnessed a of seats and for the following parties is Then come the Liberals and Democrats (Open VLD), a sharp rise in support.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 33, No. 1: Full Issue
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 33 Number 1 Winter Article 13 2004 Sutton Colloquium April 2020 Vol. 33, no. 1: Full Issue Denver Journal International Law & Policy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. DENVER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLICY VOLUME 33 2004-2005 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy VOLUME 33 NUMBER 1 Wlnter-2004 TABLE OF CoNTENTs 2004 SUTTON COLLOQUIUM KEYNOTE ADDRESS COLLECTIVE SECURITY AND THE UNITED NATIONS .................. U.S. Rep. Mark Udall 1 FOREWORD PREEMPTIVE AND PREVENTIVE USE OF FORCE, COLLECTIVE SECURITY, AND HUMAN SECURITY .................... Ved P. Nanda 7 ARTICLES THE PREVENTIVE/PREEMPTIVE WAR DOCTRINE CANNOT JUSTIFY THE IRAQ WAR ...................... Robert M. Lawrence 16 PREEMPTIVE OR PREVENTIVE WAR: A DISCUSSION OF LEGAL AND MORAL STANDARDS ...... Steven J. Barela 31 COLLECTIVE SECURITY WITH A HUMAN FACE: AN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR COORDINATED ACTION TO ALLEVIATE VIOLENCE AND POVERTY .................. Jennifer Moore 43 HUMAN SECURITY, HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION, AND THIRD WORLD CONCERNS .... Priyankar Upadhyaya 71 HUMAN SECURITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT.. John F. Jones 92 THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA, LAW, AND NATIONAL RESOLVE IN THE WAR ON TERROR ...... Robert Hardaway 104 2003-2004 LEONARD V.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Not Believe Women in Sexual Assault Cases?: an Engagement with Professors Tuerkheimer, Colb, and Many Others
    Touro Law Review Volume 34 Number 4 Dedicated to Professor Ilene Barshay Article 11 2018 Why Not Believe Women in Sexual Assault Cases?: An Engagement with Professors Tuerkheimer, Colb, and Many Others Dan Subotnik touro law center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation Subotnik, Dan (2018) "Why Not Believe Women in Sexual Assault Cases?: An Engagement with Professors Tuerkheimer, Colb, and Many Others," Touro Law Review: Vol. 34 : No. 4 , Article 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol34/iss4/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Subotnik: Why Not Believe Women WHY NOT BELIEVE WOMEN IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES?: AN ENGAGEMENT WITH PROFESSORS TUERKHEIMER, COLB, AND MANY OTHERS Dan Subotnik* [A sexual assault complaint] is an eyewitness account of a credible person. The denial of an accused rapist, by contrast, is entitled to little evidentiary weight as it is fully explained by a desire to avoid conviction. Professor Sherry Colb1 * Dan Subotnik is Professor of Law at Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center. He thanks: Dean Myra Berman, Professor Rena Seplowitz, Margaret Williams, Cecilia Shaw, and, above all, his wife, Professor Rose R. Subotnik, for editorial assistance; his research assistants, Samantha Sbrocchi and Casey Gingrich; Touro librarians, Laura Ross, Beth Chamberlain, Irene Crisci, and Michael Tatonetti; and the students who spoke freely to him about subjects that normally stay under wraps even to ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • My Secret Garden
    Nancy Friday My Secret Garden Women’s Sexual Fantasies FOR BILLY who believed in this book when it was just fantasy N.F. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD by "J," ......................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE “TELL ME WHAT YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT,” HE SAID.............................................5 CHAPTER TWO "WHY FANTASIZE WHEN YOU HAVE ME?" FRUSTRATION.................................................................... 17 Madge, Dot INSUFFICIENCY.................................................................. 21 Louella, Irene, Annette, Maria SEX ENHANCEMENT......................................................... 27 Patricia, Suzanne, FOREPLAY .......................................................................... 34 Bertha, Bellinda APPROVAL .......................................................................... 38 Sally, Vicki, Francesca, Sondra EXPLORATION.................................................................... 46 Karen, Abbie, Hilda, Heather, Kitty SEXUAL INITIATIVE........................................................... 53 Carol, Faye INSATIABILITY ................................................................... 60 Clarissa, Annabel, Iris, Nora .............................................. 65 DAYDREAMS...................................................................... 66 Corinne, Molly, Alicia, Lily, Eliza, Esther, Shirley, Lillian, Viola MASTURBATION ................................................................ 74 Patsy, Norma, Adair, Mary Beth, Elizabeth, Mary Jane, Amelia,
    [Show full text]
  • Bestiality and Religion
    Bestiality and Religion Richard L. Matteoli Those who lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. Blackfoot proverb. (Monterey, Calif.) – Bestiality, one aspect of Zoophilia, causes cancer of the penis documented in a Brazilian interdisciplinary study.[1] Zoophilia, is categorized in the DSM-IV as a paraphilia not otherwise specified. Zoophilia is an erotic fixation on animals that may result in sexual excitement through real or fancied contact. Man having intercourse with a horse, exterior of temple in Khaguraho. Book illustration: Isfahan, Iran, 15th Century Kinsey reported 8% males and 3% females had sex with animals.[2-10] Incidence is higher with people living in a pastoral setting. The Brazilian study showed those living in a pastoral setting had a 35% participatory rate among men. Ancient Greek sodomizing a goat, plate XVII from ‘De Figuris Veneria’ The Brazilian penile cancer from bestiality study involved 492 where 118, 24%, presented with cancer of the penis from which there is a direct correlation with the 1 pastoral setting.[11-12] This may give credence to male circumcision’s origin in Africa and the Middle East millennia before any current thought. Feminine reproductive organ pathology is not evident compared penile to lesions. Female Genital Mutilation, according to Dr. Pia Gallo of the University of Padua, states its reason is feminine jealousy in genetic difference where Northern desert tribes invaded southern portions of Africa and African women have larger genitalia. From a punishment it then became a social phenomenon because of genetic traits being passed through intermarriage. The taboo of zoophilia has led to Art by Franz von Bayros stigmatized groups being accused depicting oral sex between of it, including blood libel.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPARATION of CHURCH and STATE in EUROPE Ethnical, Religious and Cultural Backgrounds
    During the nineteenth and early twentieth century, the separation of state and church was an issue of great importance for liberal politicians and SEPARATION OF CHURCH parties in European politics. Liberals all over Europe tried to encourage the separation of religious institutions and the state. After the Second World War AND STATE IN EUROPE this issue seemed to become more and more irrelevant, as the separation was more or less achieved in some countries, or the existing ties did not lead WITH VIEWS ON SWEDEN, NORWAY, THE NETHERLANDS, to major troubles or inequalities. Recently the matter has become relevant BELGIUM, FRANCE, SPAIN, ITALY, SLOVENIA AND GREECE again, because of questions raised by integration of immigrants with different IN EUROPE AND STATE OF CHURCH SEPARATION ethnical, religious and cultural backgrounds. The separation of church and state developed, due to historical, cultural, social and political reasons, in very different ways in each of the Fleur de Beaufort - Ingemund Hägg - Patrick van Schie (eds.) member states of the European Union. The European Liberal Forum – a network of European liberal think tanks in connection with the European Liberal Party (ELDR) – organised several seminars on the topic of secularism. During these discussions the variety of developments in the relation between state and church showed, and so came the idea to publish a book on this matter. The purpose of the book is to provide evidence and ideas that could be used in the different countries in Europe for reforms clarifying the roles of religious organisations in relation to the state. This is of the utmost importance now that Europe is becoming more multireligious, multi-ethnic and multicultural.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Belgium Re-Elect the Swedish Coalition in Office?
    FEDERAL AND REGIONAL ELECTIONS IN BELGIUM 26th May 2019 European Will Belgium re-elect the Elections monitor Swedish coalition in office? Corinne Deloy In Belgium the government has been managing current affairs since the end of 2018. On 8th December last the New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) left the coalition in office in protest against the government’s signature of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, a text adopted in December in Marrakesh. The following day Prime Minister Charles Michel (Reform Movement, MR) formed a minority government, which resigned on 18th December Analysis under the threat of a motion of no-confidence supported by the Socialist Party (PS), the Flemish Socialist Party (SP.A) and Ecolo. On 21st December King Philippe asked Charles Michel to manage current affairs until the next parliamentary elections that will take place on the same day as the European and regional elections, i.e. 26th May next. These elections are especially important since the Belgians and the Flemish Liberals and Democrats and yellow for will not be consulted again for the next four years. “We the New Flemish Alliance, with the Flemish Christian shall enter a four-year period in which no elections will Democratic Party being represented by a cross. take place. We have not had a period without elections in peace time as long as this since 1830,” indicates Also called the “kamikaze coalition” due to the presence of Jean Faniel, General Director of the Research and Social only one French-speaking party (the Reform Movement) Political Information Centre (CRISP).
    [Show full text]