Australian Guided Weapons Sovereign Capability

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Australian Guided Weapons Sovereign Capability AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT JULY-AUG 2021 VOL.47 NO.5 AUSTRALIAN GUIDED WEAPONS SOVEREIGN CAPABILITY RNZN ARMY BMS INTERVIEW TAKES A DIFFERENT APPROACH FURTHER CLARITY JIM MCDOWELL, GROUP CEO TO MISSILE DEFENCE FOR ELBIT NOVA SYSTEMS SMART PEOPLE. SOLVING COMPLEX CHALLENGES. MAKING OUR WORLD SAFE AND SECURE. DISCOVER MORE AT NOVASYSTEMS.COM CONTENTS FEATURES Print Post Approved PP349181/00104 12 SEA 129 PHASE PROGRESS REPORT Managing Director/Publisher RAN looking at continuous capability upgrades Marilyn Tangye Butler Phone: +61 (0) 410 529 324 AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT Email: [email protected] JULY-AUG 2021 VOL.47 NO.5 16 LAND 200 BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – CONTINUED Editor More clarity but still plenty of questions Kym Bergmann Phone: +61(0)412 539 106 Email: [email protected] AUSTRALIAN 20 AFGHANISTAN – CAN WE EVER REALLY GUIDED WEAPONS DISCOVER THE TRUTH Contributors Vladimir Karnozov SOVEREIGN Australia’s military involvement ends Arie Egozi Mark Farrer CAPABILITY Mike Yeo 22 LAND 8116 ON TRACK FOR CONTRACT Geoff Slocombe SIGNATURE George Galdorisi Looks like early 2022, or sooner Australia Ventura Media Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd 26 MINISTER DUTTON AND DEFENCE PO Box 88, Miranda RNZN ARMY BMS INTERVIEW NSW 1490 Australia TAKES A DIFFERENT APPROACH FURTHER CLARITY JIM MCDOWELL, GROUP CEO V THE MEDIA TO MISSILE DEFENCE FOR ELBIT NOVA SYSTEMS ABN 76 095 476 065 The definition of pettiness Cover description: HMAS Arunta fires an Evolved Sea Sparrow Subscriptions Missile off the coast of Western Australia to test its missile ST SMART PEOPLE. Rose Jeffree systems after undergoing the Anzac Midlife Capability Assurance 28 1 PERSON INTERVIEW Phone: + 61 (0)2 9526 7188 Program upgrade. Credit: CoA / Ronnie Baltoft Jim McDowell, Group CEO, Nova Systems Fax: + 61 (0)2 9526 1779 Email: [email protected] REGULARS 31 GUIDED WEAPONS FOREWORD – THE HON SOLVING COMPLEX ADVERTISING OFFICES: MELISSA PRICE 06 EDITOR’S LETTER A vital capability Australia, NZ & Asia Pacific, The Australian COVID-19 shambles USA, Canada & South America continues CHALLENGES. Graham Joss 32 INDUSTRY UP FOR THE GUIDED WEAPONS Sales Director CHALLENGE Phone +61 2 9526 7188 Fax +61 2 9526 1779 An abundance of local talent Mobile +61 (0) 419 492 836 NEWS MAKING OUR Email: [email protected] 06 Australian Missile Corporation announces 33 INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTIONS: Europe new partners BAE Systems; EOS; IAI; Kongsberg; Lockheed Diana Scogna Martin Australia; Nioa; Nova Systems; Penten; WORLD SAFE Mobile: +33 6 6252 2547 Rafael unveils Sea Breaker attack weapon Fax: +33 1 7079 0534 Quickstep; Saab; Thales Email: [email protected] 08 Northrop Grumman to build more LAIRCM AND SECURE. systems 44 GUIDED WEAPONS – THE RNZN Israel Asa Talbar Australian and US universities make EXPERIENCE Talbar Media breakthroughs An approach that Australia should also Phone: +972-77-562-1900 consider Fax: +972-77-562-1903 BAE Systems ramps up F-35 EW production Email: [email protected] 10 Redback IFV to be tested by South 48 NEWS FROM ACROSS THE TASMAN Printer Korean Army Our regular update Times Printers ISSN 1446-6880 Design Stun Media ‹‹ ADF electronic warfare projects Email: [email protected] PREVIEW DISCOVER MORE AT NEXT ISSUE ‹‹ Simulation masterplan ‹‹ LVC training NOVASYSTEMS.COM Follow us on twitter: @APDR_APAC READ APDR: ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Facebook: Asia Pacific Defence Reporter (APDR) Register NOW For your mobile friendly APDR online www.asiapacificdefencereporter.com Sign up to the Daily Bulletin https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/#News_Bulletin_Form Contributor’s opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or editor and while every precaution has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this publication is accurate and timely, no liability is accepted by the publisher or editor for errors and omissions, however caused. Articles and information contained in this publication are the copyright of Asia Pacific Defence Publications Pty Ltd (unless otherwise stated) and cannot be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher. The publisher cannot accept responsibility for loss or damage to uncommissioned photographs, manuscripts or other media. © Ventura Media Asia Pacific Pty Ltd 2020 Asia Pacific Defence ReporterJULY-AUG 2021 3 EDS LETTER THE AUSTRALIAN COVID-19 SHAMBLES CONTINUES be fulfilled on schedule was another mistake; and a bit longer, one of the reasons why the ADF is preparations had to be made to get Australians an effective fighting force is that it trains hard stuck overseas back home. There are many more and often. The three services individually and matters that needed to be analysed, but these look collectively are being put through their paces in like the big ones. the most realistic way possible – and often with KYM BERGMANN // CANBERRA On the evidence available – or rather the lack of friends and allies. Covid has had an impact, but it – none of that was done. Once we are through only a relatively small one with exercises such t the moment it is difficult to write about all of this – perhaps in a year from now – it would as the forthcoming Talisman Sabre going full anything else – and from a national security be a good idea to have a major inquiry, preferably steam ahead. A point of view we are all once again being a Royal Commission, into what went wrong and While many exercises are physical, a lot of what reminded of the consequences of being overly how things can be improved. The initial response takes place are desktop in nature. This is what dependent on international supply chains. From of shutting down all international travel and locking should have been happening in the middle of last a project management perspective, we are being down the country was a very blunt instrument, year in preparation for vaccine distribution. The further reminded of what happens when there but it worked. However, from that point on no one federal government should have put one person is a single point of failure, such as relying on a actually seemed to have a clear idea of what to in charge, with the necessary support staff – particular vaccine, just as it was a mistake awarding do, let alone start planning for the reopening of and all of the states should have been involved. the future submarine contract to a single supplier the country. They needed a single focus: how to vaccinate so early. From a civil defence angle, we can see An inquiry might well conclude that what everyone. The day-to-day tasks of running health the chaos resulting in states having uncoordinated Australia needs is a national disaster coordination departments, giving media briefings, reassuring responses involving different agencies and varying and response body, perhaps something like the the public and especially the huge job of running lines of responsibility. US Federal Emergency Management Agency. the economy should have been left to others, One of the important things that Defence While far from perfect – it has been a bit of especially politicians. requires of companies bidding for projects is a political football with fluctuations in funding Such a body of professionals – without that they produce a risk management plan – and and in governance – the basic idea of having a any distractions and with no budget ceiling – sometimes more than one if it is for a complex single body coordinating the response to major should have been empowered to make practical and expensive undertaking. The first vaccine emergencies seems sound. recommendations to be accepted on a bipartisan against Covid-19 was announced by Pfizer on The closest Australia has come in the time of basis. If changes to federal laws were needed, that January 20, 2020 – almost 18 months ago. Covid has been meetings of the National Cabinet, would hopefully have taken place with the support Others quickly followed. What was not known which started off as quite productive but then often of the opposition and the crossbench – after all, at that stage was how effective it would be, degenerated into political point scoring between who would want to get in the way of a response how safe, how long it would last – and so on. the states and the federal government – and to a pandemic? Any states that quibbled over the But from that moment onwards the experts amongst themselves - as well as demonstrating constitutionality of measures would be welcome to knew that it could be done – and what followed the blame-shifting that has become such a notable take their complaints to the High Court, preferably was accelerated testing to answer the other feature of life in general, and politics in particular. after the pandemic was over. questions and fine tune the solutions. If we look at two small inquiries that have To conclude on an entirely different note: the Allowing for a certain level of political inertia – it already taken place – the Ruby Princess demoting of Veterans’ Affairs Minister Darren took a few months for most people to be finally passenger disaster in NSW and the Melbourne Chester, axed because he was not a supporter convinced of the seriousness of the situation – hotel quarantine disaster – amazingly it transpired of the new leader of the National Party Barnaby planning should have commenced in mid 2020 for in both cases that no one was to blame. It was as Joyce. Mr Chester was decent, hard working and the rapid roll out of vaccines to all Australians. That if things just magically happened by themselves widely respected. By his own account, the reasons needed to involve risk management experts, who with unclear records, losses of memory and given by Mr Joyce for his sacking were incoherent. would have concluded very quickly that relying a general sense of confusion about who was He will be missed – and his removal is a sad so heavily on a single vaccine from Astra Zeneca responsible for everything.
Recommended publications
  • Future Technology and International Cooperation a UK Perspective
    MAY Future Technology and International Cooperation A UK perspective In 2011, NATO’s Integrated Air Defence (NATINAD) and the supporting NATO Integrated Air Defence System (NATINADS) marked 50 years of safeguarding NATO’s skies. In order to successfully reach future milestones NATO must continue (and in many cases improve) its air defence interoperability across the strategic, operational and tactical domains. In order for this to become reality a combination of exploiting synergies and acknowledging that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts1 is required at all levels. Recent improvements and a greater focus on future capability within the UK’s Joint Ground Based Air Defence (Jt GBAD) will enable the Formation to deploy its units and sub-units in order to operate the latest air defence weapon systems, within a multinational environment, against a near-peer adversary or asymmetric threat, and win. Major Charles W.I. May RA – 14 (Cole’s Kop) Battery Royal Artillery* the strategic direction of the British Armed ‘If I didn‘t have air supremacy, I wouldn‘t be here.’ Forces, and subsequently the operational level (SACEUR, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, June 1944) construct. As the new direction is towards Joint Force 2025 (JF2025) it is pragmatic for this paper to focus on the next 10 years. The his article will highlight the UK military’s purpose is to identify and highlight the Tstrategic situation, perception and under- pertinent capability enhancements and future standing of the air threat before explaining the vision of the UK’s Ground Based Air Defence new military structure to which the Formation Formation and its developing role within the is adapting.
    [Show full text]
  • WBACC Annual Report 2013
    Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council Annual Report 2013 –2014 Cover image: Mary’s Bay looking towards Summercloud Bay © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 ISSN 1832-5181 The contents of this Annual Report and Statement of Accounts are protected by the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The document is produced solely for the purposes of reporting to its members as required by law and the report or any part of this report must not be reproduced or published without the express written permission of the Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council. Address: Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council Administration Building 5 Bunaan Close WRECK BAY JBT 2540 www.wbacc.gov.au Contact Officer: Mal Hansen, CEO Publisher: Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council Designer: LG2 designers Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council Annual Report 2013–2014 iii iv Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council Annual Report 2013–2014 Contents Contents v Statements vi Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council 1 Our Vision 1 Our Goals 1 Overview 2 Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council 3 Membership 3 Land Ownership/Management 7 Functions 8 Wreck Bay Village 9 Wreck Bay Community 9 Timeline 10 Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council 11 Board Members 16 Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council 17 Board Meetings 1st July 2013 to 30 June 2014 20 WBACC Report 22 Chairman’s Report 23 The year in retrospect 23 Governance 23 Community Service 25 Land Management 27 The Way Ahead 28 Chief Executive Officer’s Report 29 Funding Grants and other income 30 Contracts 30 Further Operational Activities
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D European & Security ES & Defence 4/2016 International Security and Defence Journal Protected Logistic Vehicles ISSN 1617-7983 • www.euro-sd.com • Naval Propulsion South Africa‘s Defence Exports Navies and shipbuilders are shifting to hybrid The South African defence industry has a remarkable breadth of capa- and integrated electric concepts. bilities and an even more remarkable depth in certain technologies. August 2016 Jamie Shea: NATO‘s Warsaw Summit Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology The backbone of every strong troop. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles. When your mission is clear. When there’s no road for miles around. And when you need to give all you’ve got, your equipment needs to be the best. At times like these, we’re right by your side. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles: armoured, highly capable off-road and logistics vehicles with payloads ranging from 0.5 to 110 t. Mobilising safety and efficiency: www.mercedes-benz.com/defence-vehicles Editorial EU Put to the Test What had long been regarded as inconceiv- The second main argument of the Brexit able became a reality on the morning of 23 campaigners was less about a “democratic June 2016. The British voted to leave the sense of citizenship” than of material self- European Union. The majority that voted for interest. Despite all the exception rulings "Brexit", at just over 52 percent, was slim, granted, the United Kingdom is among and a great deal smaller than the 67 percent the net contribution payers in the EU. This who voted to stay in the then EEC in 1975, money, it was suggested, could be put to but ignoring the majority vote is impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • 11Th Australian Space Forum Wednesday 31 March 2021 Adelaide, South Australia
    11th Australian Space Forum Wednesday 31 March 2021 Adelaide, South Australia 11th Australian Space Forum a 11th Australian Space Forum Wednesday 31 March 2021 Adelaide, South Australia Major Sponsor Supported by b 11th Australian Space Forum c Contents Welcome from the Chair of The Andy Thomas Space Foundation The Andy Thomas Space Foundation is delighted to welcome you to the 11th Australian Space Forum. Contents 11th Australian Space Forum The Foundation will be working with partners Wednesday 31 March 2021 1 Welcome and sponsors, including the Australian Space Adelaide, South Australia — Chair of The Andy Thomas Agency, on an ambitious agenda of projects Space Foundation to advance space education and outreach. Adelaide Convention Centre, — Premier of South Australia We are reaching out to friends and supporters North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia — Head of the Australian who have a shared belief in the power of Forum sessions: Hall C Space Agency education, the pursuit of excellence and a Exhibition: Hall H commitment to diversity and inclusion. We 6 Message from the CEO The Foundation was established in 2020 for look forward to conversations during the 8 Forum Schedule the purpose of advancing space education, Forum – as well as ongoing interaction - about raising space awareness and contributing our shared interests and topics of importance 11 Speaker Profiles to the national space community. We to the national space community. are delighted that the South Australian 28 Company Profiles We hope you enjoy the 11th Australian Government has entrusted us with the future Space Forum. 75 Foundation Corporate Sponsors conduct of the Australian Space Forum – and Professional Partners Australia’s most significant space industry Michael Davis AO meeting – and we intend to ensure that the Chair, Andy Thomas Space Foundation 76 Venue Map Forum continues to be the leading national 77 Exhibition Floorplan platform for the highest quality information and discussion about space industry topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Frank Cooper on Air Force Policy in the 1950S & 1960S
    The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society Copyright © Royal Air Force Historical Society, 1993 All rights reserved. 1 Copyright © 1993 by Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 1993 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Printed by Hastings Printing Company Limited Royal Air Force Historical Society 2 THE PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Issue No 11 President: Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Committee Chairman: Air Marshal Sir Frederick B Sowrey KCB CBE AFC General Secretary: Group Captain J C Ainsworth CEng MRAeS Membership Secretary: Commander P O Montgomery VRD RNR Treasurer: D Goch Esq FCCA Programme Air Vice-Marshal G P Black CB OBE AFC Sub-Committee: Air Vice-Marshal F D G Clark CBE BA Air Commodore J G Greenhill FBIM T C G James CMG MA *Group Captain I Madelin Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA Group Captain A R Thompson MBE MPhil BA FBIM MIPM Members: A S Bennell Esq MA BLitt *Dr M A Fopp MA PhD FMA FBIM A E Richardson *Group Captain N E Taylor BSc D H Wood Comp RAeS * Ex-officio The General Secretary Regrettably our General Secretary of five years standing, Mr B R Jutsum, has found it necessary to resign from the post and the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Naval Architect
    THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 HMAS Adelaide preparing to embark United States Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles during Exercise Rim of the Pacific 18 (RIMPAC 2018), Hawaii, in July. HMAS Adelaide unexpectedly took a lead role in the amphibious phase of RIMPAC when the US Navy assault ship planned for that role suffered mechanical problems and remained in Pearl Harbour for most of the exercise. HMAS Adelaide led HMA Ships Success, Melbourne and Toowoomba across the Pacific to take part in this major exercise which involved 25 nations, 46 surface ships, five submarines, 17 land forces, and more than 200 aircraft and 25 000 personnel. This major international exercise is held every two years (RAN photograph) THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Journal of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (Australian Division) Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 Cover Photo: CONTENTS An impression of BAE Systems’ Global Com- 2 From the Division President bat Ship — Australia, selected as the preferred 3 Editorial design for Australia’s new frigates 4 Letter to the Editor (Image courtesy Department of Defence) 4 Coming Events The Australian Naval Architect is published four times per 5 News from the Sections year. All correspondence and advertising copy should be 15 Classification Society News sent to: The Editor 17 From the Crows Nest The Australian Naval Architect 18 General News c/o RINA PO Box No. 462 36 The Acquisition of a Multi-role Aviation Jamison Centre, ACT 2614 Training Vessel for the Royal Australian AUSTRALIA Navy — Alex Robbins email: [email protected] 39 Upgrade or Replace: A Cost Comparison The deadline for the next edition of The Australian Na- val Architect (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornet Fv1620
    HORNET FV1620 Clive Elliott explains how the development of the Hornet missile launcher. The Hornet missile launcher was developed under the FVRDE design specification FV1620. Depending on the stage of development the vehicle was identified as: Truck, 1 Ton, Armoured Launcher, 4x4, Humber. Launcher, Guided Missile, Truck Mounted. Truck, 1 Ton, Airportable Launcher, 4x4. Launcher, Guided Missile, Truck Mounted (Malkara) Armoured, 1 Ton, 4x4, Humber Hornet. The Humber 1-Ton trucks were introduced in the early 1950s and were designated by the Fighting Vehicle Research & Development Establishment (FVRDE) as the FV1600 series. They demonstrate how a wide range of variants can be based on a cargo truck. Other 1-Ton trucks of the time, like the Austin K9 (FV16000 series) and Morris MRA/1 (FV16100 series) were based on a commercial chassis, but the Humber was developed exclusively for military use and was the only ‘standardised’ 1-Ton truck. Standardised, means that it has some components that are shared with other standardised vehicles such as Champ, Ferret, Saracen etc. Of all the Humber variants the armoured version known as the Pig saw the longest service and is the most widely known variant. But the most ingenious variant must be the Hornet (FV1620) which became the launch vehicle for the Malkara Anti-Tank Guided Weapon (ATGW). The adoption of Malkara by the British Army spawned a range of other Humber variants to supply, test and repair the Malkara system. It has been said that the Hornet was a rather improvised vehicle and that a better launch vehicle could have been designed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Whittaker
    Raytheon Australia 4 Brindabella Cct Brindabella Park Canberra Airport, ACT 2609 Andrew Whittaker General Manager Above Water Systems Andrew Whittaker is the General Manager of the Above Water Systems Product Line for Raytheon Australia. In this role he is accountable for Raytheon Australia’s performance on a range of maritime programs, including the complex multi-billion dollar Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) Program. With skilled resources in Adelaide, Sydney and Perth, he is responsible for the sustainment and growth of Raytheon Australia’s surface ships capability, including Combat System integration, enterprise services, sustainment and training services. Andrew has over 33 years experience as a professional engineer, including 23 years experience in senior leadership positions. He has an extensive background in project management, systems engineering, and in the, specification, development, and implementation of electronics and software based systems. He joined Raytheon Australia in 2005 as Engineering Director in the Naval Systems Business Unit and has served as a member of AWD Alliance Management Team since 2007. He held the Navy delegation as the senior engineer on the AWD Program between 2007 and 2017. Andrew started his professional career in 1987 with Cossor Electronics (a Raytheon company) as an electronics design engineer. In 1991 he migrated from the UK to Australia joining Stanilite and then ADI Limited (now Thales). He was responsible for the design and development of communications switching systems that were integrated into the ANZAC frigates, Military Air Traffic Control systems and Cellular telephony systems exported to PNG and China. He was also the technical lead for the JTFHQ integration into HMAS Manoora and a number of other successful projects and bids.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Col 09 SEPT 2020 Clarion
    CLArion Issue No 20200901, September 2020 CLA on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CivilLibertiesAus/ Email newsletter of Civil Liberties Australia (A04043) Email: Secretary(at)cla.asn.au Web: http://www.cla.asn.au/ ____________________________________________ Covid-19 vaccination: CLA’s position If a vaccine is found for the Covid-19 virus, in general it should NOT be mandatory for Australians to be vaccinated, CLA believes. When Prime Minister Scott Morrison said the vaccine would be mandatory, he misspoke: within hours he had walked back his comments significantly. CLA’s policy on accessing health is: are not willing to be vaccinated. Sometimes this will not be possible. • Everyone has the right to equal access to publicly- provided health services, and to receive or refuse medical While children are apparently not largely affected by Covid-19, treatment. Mental health patients have the same rights. they may be significant carriers. It is possible that children and others could be prevented from visiting places such as aged • In the absence of informed consent, ideally no one should be forced to have any medical treatment. If treatment is care homes for a number of years, until widespread (“herd”) needed for urgent or life-saving reasons (as sometimes protection is in place. ordered by a court), the least intrusive or invasive CLA in general supports the measures for introducing one or treatment should be given. more Covid-19 vaccines to Australia. But these are preliminary • If governments or businesses seek to make vaccination a comments. Much more information will be needed before any of compulsory requirement to access benefits, services, us can sign off on a specific vaccine or vaccination policy.
    [Show full text]
  • H.M.S. Leander
    Leander Class Frigate H.M.S. LEANDER 1972 - 1989 1/350 Scale The Type 12 (Improved) or Leander Class Frigates that were introduced into Royal Navy service from the early 1960’s, were the most numerous of any of the classes of ships of the modern era. The design of the Leander class was based on the earlier Whitby and Rothesay class Type 12 hull, which had already proved it’s excellent sea keeping qualities, but had a simplified superstructure layout which included a built in helicopter hangar. The hull was built up flush with the main deck at the stern, which gave a better protected area for the variable depth sonar installation as well as improved deck space around the mortar well . The Leander class Frigates were split into three batches and were built between 1959 and 1973. The first batch of 10 was fitted with Y100 machinery the second batch of 6 having the upgraded Y136 machinery fitted. The third batch of 10 ships were known as the Broad Beam Leander’s and had a hull that was wider by 2 feet to accommodate the Y160 machinery fit. HMS Leander, was the name ship of the first batch of the Leander class and was laid down at Harland and Wolff of Belfast on 10th April 1959.Originally intended to be a Rothesay Class Frigate to name HMS Weymouth the plans were changed for her completion as a new Leander class ship. She was launched on 28th June 1961 and commissioned into service on 27th March 1963. Her early years between 1963 and 1970 were spent in her original fit as a general purpose frigate with the twin 4.5” Mk6 gun turret mounted on the fore deck.
    [Show full text]