Energy Sector of the World and Poland Beginnings, Development, Present State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy Sector of the World and Poland Beginnings, Development, Present State . Polish Member Committee of the World Energy Council ENERGY SECTOR OF THE WORLD AND POLAND BEGINNINGS, DEVELOPMENT, PRESENT STATE Second edition, updated Warsaw, December 2014 Contents FOREWORD .................................................................................................... 115 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 117 PART I. ENERGY SECTOR OF THE WORLD .................................................................. 119 1. General characteristics of the history of human use of energy .......................................... 121 1.1 Ancient times and antiquity .......................................................................... 121 1.2 Modern times to the end of 18th century ............................................................ 121 1.3 Period of industrial revolution and of the economic development in 19th and 20th centuries .. 122 2. Main driving forces of the energy demand growth ....................................................... 123 2.1 Population growth ..................................................................................... 123 2.2 Economic growth ...................................................................................... 123 3. Global reserves of energy commodities and their classification ......................................... 126 3.1 Global reserves of non-renewable energy commodities ........................................... 126 3.2 Hard coal and lignite .................................................................................. 126 3.3 Hydrocarbons – crude oil and natural gas .......................................................... 127 3.4 Bitumen ................................................................................................ 128 3.5 Uranium ores .......................................................................................... 129 3.6 Renewable energy sources – general characteristics ............................................... 130 3.7 Hydro energy resources ............................................................................... 131 3.8 Biomass resources .................................................................................... 131 3.9 Peat resources ......................................................................................... 131 3.10 Solar energy ........................................................................................... 131 3.11 Geothermal energy .................................................................................... 132 3.12 Wind energy ........................................................................................... 133 3.13 Wave energy, tidal energy, ocean thermal energy .................................................. 133 4. Global production, international trade and consumption of primary energy ........................... 134 4.1 Beginnings and development of primary energy production ...................................... 134 4.2 Development of primary energy subsectors ......................................................... 135 4.2.1 Hard coal and lignite production .............................................................. 135 4.2.2 Crude oil production ........................................................................... 135 4.2.3 Natural gas production ........................................................................ 136 4.2.4 Nuclear energy for electricity generation ..................................................... 136 4.2.5 Use of renewable energy sources ............................................................. 137 4.3 Producers, exporters and importers of fossil fuels .................................................. 137 4.3.1 Hard coal and lignite ........................................................................... 137 111 4.3.2 Crude oil ......................................................................................... 138 4.3.3 Natural gas ..................................................................................... 138 4.4 Global consumption of primary energy and its structure .......................................... 139 4.5 Indicators of per capita primary energy consumption .............................................. 141 5. Development of the global electricity industry ........................................................... 142 5.1 Beginnings and development of the electricity industry ........................................... 142 5.2 Global capacity of power plants, its structure and level of utilisation ............................ 142 5.3 Electricity production – main producers ............................................................. 143 5.4 Structure of electricity production ................................................................... 143 5.5 Development of global consumption of electricity ................................................. 144 5.6 Indicators of per capita electricity consumption .................................................... 144 6. Energy intensity of the global economy ................................................................... 147 6.1 Energy intensity indicators ............................................................................ 147 6.2 Energy intensity of GDP in the macro scale ......................................................... 147 7. Energy prices ................................................................................................ 149 7.1 Prices of energy commodities in international trade ............................................... 149 7.2 Final prices of fuels and energy in OECD countries ................................................. 151 8 Energy and the environment ............................................................................... 153 8.1 Energy sector impacts at the natural environment ................................................. 153 8.2 Activities mitigating degradation of the natural environment ..................................... 153 8.3 Global emission of CO2 and global warming of the Earth atmosphere ........................... 155 9. Summary of Part I of the report ........................................................................... 158 PART II. ENERGY SECTOR OF POLAND ...................................................................... 165 10. Basic information on Poland ............................................................................... 166 10.1 Social and economic situation of Poland in the years 1918-2013 .................................. 166 10.2 Country area, population, borders, membership in international organisations ................. 166 11. Historical outline of the energy development of Poland ................................................. 168 11.1 Beginnings and development of energy use at the lands of Poland up to the First World War . 168 11.2 Energy sector in the period of independence 1918-1939 ............................................ 168 11.3 Development of energy sector in the period of centrally planned economy 1945-1989 .......... 169 11.4 Development of energy sector in the conditions of market economy 1990-2013 ................. 170 12. Reserves of energy commodities in Poland ............................................................... 171 12.1 Reserves of fossil fuels ................................................................................ 171 12.1.1 Hard coal ........................................................................................ 171 12.1.2 Lignite ........................................................................................... 171 12.1.3 Crude oil ......................................................................................... 173 12.1.4 Natural gas ..................................................................................... 173 12.2 Resources of renewable energy ...................................................................... 174 12.2.1 Hydro energy ................................................................................... 174 12.2.2 Geothermal energy ............................................................................. 174 12.2.3 Biomass ......................................................................................... 174 12.2.4 Wind energy ..................................................................................... 175 13. Development of the fuel and energy subsectors .......................................................... 176 112 13.1 Hard coal mining ...................................................................................... 176 13.2 Lignite mining ......................................................................................... 178 13.3 Oil industry ............................................................................................ 179 13.4 Gas industry ........................................................................................... 181 13.5 Electricity supply industry ............................................................................ 182 13.6 Heat production and supply .......................................................................... 185 14. Primary energy – production and consumption 1950-2013 .............................................. 187 14.1 Production, import, export and consumption of primary energy .................................. 187 14.2 Structure of primary energy consumption .........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Download (7MB)
    British Technologies and Polish Economic Development 1815-1863 Simon Niziol Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science University of London December 1995 UMI Number: U084454 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U084454 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 "Theses . F 9555 . 12586 2-5 Abstract After the restoration of peace in 1815, several European countries sought to transform their economies by the direct borrowing of British technologies. One of these was the semi- autonomous Kingdom of Poland. The Kingdom's technology transfer initiatives have been largely ignored by foreign researchers, while Polish historians have failed to place developments in the Kingdom within a wider context of European followership. The varying fortunes of Polish transfer initiatives offer valuable insights into the mechanisms and constraints of the transfer process. A close study of attempts to introduce British technologies in mechanical engineering, metallurgy, railway construction, textile production and agriculture contradicts most Polish scholarship by establishing that most of the transfer initiatives were either misplaced or at least premature.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    Contents Director’s Introduction 1 Geological and thematic maps 2 Regional geological research 4 Global changes in the past 6 CZECH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Landscape vulnerability analysis 8 Groundwater research and evaluation 10 Annual Report 2015 Mineral resources 12 Mine workings and mining waste 16 Research into environmental and geo-energy technologies 18 Regional Geological Administration 20 Geological Information System 22 Remote sensing 25 International activities and cooperation 26 Laboratories 32 Library and Collections 34 Geological documentation 36 Publishing House and promotional activities 38 Selected publications issued by the Czech Geological Survey 41 Selected scientific papers 44 www.geology.cz Financial review 48 Human resources 50 Website of the Czech Geological Survey 51 Principal events in 2015 52 Czech Geological Survey Annual Report 2015 Projects 58 Edited by Petr Maděra Executive editor: Šárka Sedláčková An interview with geologist and oceanographer Zdeněk Kukal 66 Translation: Miroslav Rejchrt Graphic design: Oleg Man ISBN 978-80-7075-911-0 Photo on the cover: Vladimír Žáček Printed by Tiskárna Daniel, s. r. o., Prague Published by the Czech Geological Survey, Prague 2016 03/9 446-411-16 ISBN 978-80 -7075-911- 0 © Czech Geological Survey, 2016 Director’s Introduction The Czech Geological Survey (CGS), established by the Ministry of the Environment to carry out the duty of state geological survey, is also a leading research institution in the fi eld of geoscience in the Czech Republic. It has the largest production of geoscientifi c publications with impact factor and plays a major role in international research activities. I would like to highlight several outstanding results we achieved in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Mining Limits in the North Bohemian Lignite Region
    The environmental mining limits in the North Bohemian Lignite Region …need to be preserved permanently and the remaining settlements, landscape and population protected against further devastation or Let’s recreate a landscape of homes from a landscape of mines Ing. arch. Martin Říha, Ing. Jaroslav Stoklasa, CSc. Ing. Marie Lafarová Ing. Ivan Dejmal RNDr. Jan Marek, CSc. Petr Pakosta Ing. Arch. Karel Beránek 1 Photo (original version) © Ibra Ibrahimovič Development and implementation of the original version: Typoexpedice, Karel Čapek Originally published by Společnost pro krajinu, Kamenická 45, Prague 7 in 2005 Updated and expanded by Karel Beránek in 2011 2 3 Černice Jezeři Chateau Arboretum Area of 3 million m3 landslides in June 2005 Czechoslovak Army Mine 4 5 INTRODUCTION Martin Říha Jaroslav Stoklasa, Marie Lafarová, Jan Marek, Petr Pakosta The Czechoslovak Communist Party and government strategies of the 1950s and 60s emphasised the development of heavy industry and energy, dependent almost exclusively on brown coal. The largest deposits of coal are located in the basins of the foothills of the Ore Mountains, at Sokolov, Chomutov, Most and Teplice. These areas were developed exclusively on the basis of coal mining at the expense of other economic activities, the natural environment, the existing built environment, social structures and public health. Everything had to make way for coal mining as coal was considered the “life blood of industry”. Mining executives, mining projection auxiliary operations, and especially Communist party functionaries were rewarded for ever increasing the quantities of coal mined and the excavation and relocation of as much overburden as possible. When I began in 1979 as an officer of government of the regional Regional National Committee (KNV) for North Bohemia in Ústí nad Labem, the craze for coal was in full swing, as villages, one after another, were swallowed up.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Report on Air Quality in the Tri-Border Region of the Czech Republic, Poland and Germany in 2004 (Former Black Triangle Region)
    Joint report on air quality in the Tri-border region of the Czech Republic, Poland and Germany in 2004 (former Black Triangle region) Společná zpráva o kvalitě ovzduší v příhraniční oblasti České republiky, Polska a Německa v roce 2004 (bývalá oblast Černého trojúhelníku) Gemeinsamer Bericht zur Luftqualität im Dreiländereck der Tschechischen Republik, Polens und Deutschlands 2004 (ehemals Schwarzes Dreieck) Wspólny raport o jakości powietrza w trójgranicznym regionie Republiki Czeskiej, Polski i Niemiec w roku 2004 (były region Czarnego Trójkąta) Editing agencies: Český hydrometeorologický ústav (ČHMÚ), Wojewódzki Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska (WIOŚ), Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie (SLfUG), Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Authors: Jan Abraham, Frank Berger, Róża Ciechanowicz-Kusztal, Grażyna Jodłowska-Opyd, Dagmar Kallweit, Josef Keder, Waldemar Kulaszka, Jiří Novák Cover design: Wiesława Morawiak, Artur Krajewski Photo: Janusz Moniatowicz © WIOŚ Wrocław 2003 Data sources: ČHMÚ, WIOŚ, LfUG, UBA, Instytut Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej (IMGW), Urząd Marszałkowski (UM) URLs: Czech: www.env.cz www.chmi.cz German: www.umweltbundesamt.de www.umwelt.sachsen.de/lfug Polish: www.wroclaw.pios.gov.pl © 2005 ČHMÚ, WIOŚ, LfUG, UBA Introduction About 15 years ago the Tri-border Region of the Czech Republic, Poland and Germany was called the Black Triangle (covering Northern Bohemia, part of Lower Silesia and Saxony) and was characterised by the highest air pollution in Europe. So it was necessary to find an approach for solving the transboundary air quality problems. Consequently a joint declaration of cooperation in solving environmental problems in the Black Triangle Region was signed by the ministers of environment of former Czechoslovakia, Germany and Poland in June 1991. The European Commission was invited to become the fourth partner in this initiative and to assist the region through PHARE project funding worth 13 million ECU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Health and Nutritional Status of Norway Spruce Stands in the Krušné Hory Mts
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 59, 2013 (9): 359–369 The health and nutritional status of Norway spruce stands in the Krušné hory Mts. 15 years subsequent to the extreme winter of 1995/96 B. Lomský, V. Šrámek, R. Novotný Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Jíloviště-Strnady, Czech Republic ABSTRACT: Since 1994, the nutritional status and the air pollution load have been evaluated on 20 research plots, located in young Norway spruce stands in the ridge area of the Krušné hory Mts. The most recent acute damage to the spruce stands, in the winter of 1995/96, was connected with a long-lasting inversion situation in the eastern area of the Krušné hory Mts. Today, the health status of the spruce stands, expressed in terms of the crown defoliation, has recovered and is comparable to that found in other regions of the Czech Republic. The sulphur and fluorine content of the needles has decreased significantly. The long-term negative effect of acid deposition that contributes to the degradation of forest soils remains an important part of stressors acting on forest ecosystems in the region. In recent years, nitrogen and sulphur concentrations in the needles have increased slightly again. A long-term tendency towards a decrease in the phosphorus, calcium and potassium content of the needles was detected. Keywords: forest health; tree nutrition; air pollution; Ore Mts. The forest stands of the Czech Republic are con- significantly (Kubelka 1993) and this has resulted in stantly influenced by anthropogenic factors. The effect the improvement of the forest health. This positive of air-borne pollutants such as sulphur dioxide, fluo- trend was interrupted in the winter of 1995/96, during rine or nitrogen oxides and of acid deposition has had which an extensive decline in the forest was recorded a substantial influence on the forest vitality and pro- in the ridge part of the Krušné hory Mts., over an area ductivity in the “Black Triangle” – the mountain area of about 12,000 ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosting Offers from the Silesian and Opolskie Voivodeships (Poland) for the Marie
    HOSTING OFFERS FROM THE SILESIAN AND OPOLSKIE VOIVODESHIPS (POLAND) FOR THE MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE INDIVIDUAL FELLOWSHIPS IN HORIZON 2020 We are looking for enthusiastic and experienced researchers of any nationality interested in submitting a joint application for the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships! More information about this call can be found at: H2020-MSCA-IF-2020 1 TABLE OF CONTEST: I. THE SILESIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................................. 3 Faculty of Architecture ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science ........................................................... 6 Faculty of Applied Mathematics .............................................................................................................. 8 Faculty of Materials Engineering ...................................................................................................................... 9 Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering .......... 11 Department of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Division of Geochronology fnd Environmental Isotopes, Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of Lower Silesia [Gleby Dolnego Śląska]
    GLEBY DOLNEGO ŚLĄSKA: geneza, różnorodność i ochrona SOILS OF LOWER SILESIA: origins, diversity and protection SOILS of Lower Silesia: origins, diversity and protection Monograph edited by Cezary Kabała Polish Society of Soil Science Wrocław Branch Polish Humic Substances Society Wrocław 2015 GLEBY Dolnego Śląska: geneza, różnorodność i ochrona Praca zbiorowa pod redakcją Cezarego Kabały Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze Oddział Wrocławski Polskie Towarzystwo Substancji Humusowych Wrocław 2015 Autorzy (w porządku alfabetycznym) Contributors (in alphabetic order) Jakub Bekier Andrzej Kocowicz Tomasz Bińczycki Mateusz Krupski Adam Bogacz Grzegorz Kusza Oskar Bojko Beata Łabaz Mateusz Cuske Marian Marzec Irmina Ćwieląg-Piasecka Agnieszka Medyńska-Juraszek Magdalena Dębicka Elżbieta Musztyfaga Bernard Gałka Zbigniew Perlak Leszek Gersztyn Artur Pędziwiatr Bartłomiej Glina Ewa Pora Elżbieta Jamroz Agnieszka Przybył Paweł Jezierski Stanisława Strączyńska Cezary Kabała Katarzyna Szopka Anna Karczewska Rafał Tyszka Jarosław Kaszubkiewicz Jarosław Waroszewski Dorota Kawałko Jerzy Weber Jakub Kierczak Przemysław Woźniczka Recenzenci Reviewers Tadeusz Chodak Michał Licznar Jerzy Drozd Stanisława Elżbieta Licznar Stanisław Laskowski Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze Oddział Wrocławski Polskie Towarzystwo Substancji Humusowych Redakcja: Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Instytut Nauk o Glebie i Ochrony Środowiska 50-357 Wrocław, ul. Grunwaldzka 53 Druk i oprawa: Ultima-Druk Sp z o.o. 51-123 Wrocław, ul. W. Pola 77a ISBN 978-83-934096-4-8 Monografia
    [Show full text]
  • Wykaz Identyfikatorów I Nazw Jednostek Podziału Terytorialnego Kraju” Zawiera Jednostki Tego Podziału Określone W: − Ustawie Z Dnia 24 Lipca 1998 R
    ZAK£AD WYDAWNICTW STATYSTYCZNYCH, 00-925 WARSZAWA, AL. NIEPODLEG£0ŒCI 208 Informacje w sprawach sprzeda¿y publikacji – tel.: (0 22) 608 32 10, 608 38 10 PRZEDMOWA Niniejsza publikacja „Wykaz identyfikatorów i nazw jednostek podziału terytorialnego kraju” zawiera jednostki tego podziału określone w: − ustawie z dnia 24 lipca 1998 r. o wprowadzeniu zasadniczego trójstopniowego podziału terytorialnego państwa (Dz. U. Nr 96, poz. 603 i Nr 104, poz. 656), − rozporządzeniu Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 sierpnia 1998 r. w sprawie utworzenia powiatów (Dz. U. Nr 103, poz. 652) zaktualizowane na dzień 1 stycznia 2010 r. Aktualizacja ta uwzględnia zmiany w podziale teryto- rialnym kraju dokonane na podstawie rozporządzeń Rady Ministrów w okresie od 02.01.1999 r. do 01.01.2010 r. W „Wykazie...”, jako odrębne pozycje wchodzące w skład jednostek zasadniczego podziału terytorialnego kraju ujęto dzielnice m. st. Warszawy oraz delegatury (dawne dzielnice) miast: Kraków, Łódź, Poznań i Wrocław a także miasta i obszary wiejskie wchodzące w skład gmin miejsko-wiejskich. Zamieszczone w wykazie identyfikatory jednostek podziału terytorialnego zostały okre- ślone w: − załączniku nr 1 do rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 grudnia 1998 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad prowadzenia, stosowania i udostępniania krajowego rejestru urzędo- wego podziału terytorialnego kraju oraz związanych z tym obowiązków organów admini- stracji rządowej i jednostek samorządu terytorialnego, obowiązującego od dnia 1 stycz- nia 1999 r. (Dz. U. z 1998 r. Nr 157, poz. 1031), − kolejnych rozporządzeniach Rady Ministrów zmieniających powyższe rozporządzenie w zakresie załącznika nr 1 (Dz. U. z 2000 Nr 13, poz. 161, z 2001 r. Nr 12, poz. 100 i Nr 157, poz.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Action Plan Liberec Region
    REGIONAL ACTION PLAN LIBEREC REGION – LOWER SILESIA For improving cross-border passenger rail Final transport Liberec Region - Lower Silesia 11 2018 D.T2.1.2 Page 1 The Trans-Borders project is to make a significant contribution to further development of German-Polish-Czech cooperation in the field of rail passenger transport. In recent years, quantitative, temporal and quality improvement has been noted between Lower Silesia and the Liberec Region, but this process requires continuation as public transport is still not fully competitive with, for example, individual means of transport. Targeted measures within the cross-border project will allow the process that has already started to continue. The development and implementation of a regional action plan aimed at connecting the cross-border region between Lower Silesia and the Liberec Region will contribute to connecting this area with the nearest TEN-T hubs in Wrocław and Praha and will improve not only its communication accessibility but also its attractiveness. The implementation of the regional action plan will support the strategy for sustainable cross-border passenger transport and will correspond to the proposed measures and actions. Page 2 MOTIVATION Linking the peripheral area of Borderland CZ/D/PL to the TEN-T node The neighbouring regions of Lower Silesia and the Liberec Region are located between two corridors of the European railway traffic core network, namely the Orient/East-Med Corridor and the Baltic-Adriatic corridor. For the development of both regions, it is necessary to improve access to the corridors and their respective hubs in Wrocław, Praha and Dresden and between them.
    [Show full text]
  • JESSICA Evaluation Study for Silesia Disclaimer
    Developed for the European Investment Katowice ul. Karłowicza 13 Bank Tel: 32 730 2510, 32 730 2509, 32 730 2511 Fax: 32 730 2512, [email protected] JESSICA Evaluation Study for Silesia Disclaimer This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. City Consulting Institute Sp. z o.o. C i t y C o nsulting Institute Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Review of the market for urban regeneration projects in the Silesia region ................................ 14 1.1. Regeneration projects implemented in Silesia ...................................................................... 14 1.1.1. Financing sources of regeneration projects .................................................................. 14 1.1.2. Principles of financing regeneration projects ............................................................... 14 1.1.3. Formal conditions necessary to implement regeneration projects .............................. 16 1.1.4. Availability of resources for regeneration projects ....................................................... 18 1.1.5. Characteristics of the completed projects .................................................................... 19 1.1.6. Conclusions for JESSICA ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Village German
    Village Polish, Lithuanian, Village German (Village today), Powiat today, Woiwodschaft today, Country North East Russian County German Province German Abelischken/Ilmenhorst (Belkino), Pravdinsk, Kaliningrad, German Empire (Russia) 542529 213708 Белкино Gerdauen Ostpreussen Ablenken (Oplankys), , Taurage, German Empire (Lithuania) 551020 220842 Oplankys Tilsit Ostpreussen Abschermeningken/Almental (Obszarniki), Goldap, Warminsko‐Mazurskie, German Empire (Poland) 542004 220741 Obszarniki Darkehmen Ostpreussen Abschwangen (Tishino), Bagrationovsk, Kaliningrad, German Empire (Russia) 543000 204520 Тишино Preussisch Eylau Ostpreussen Absteinen (Opstainys), Pagegiai, Taurage, German Empire (Lithuania) 550448 220748 Opstainys Tilsit Ostpreussen Absteinen (W of Chernyshevskoye), Nesterov, Kaliningrad, German Empire (Russia) 543800 224200 Stallupoenen Ostpreussen Achodden/Neuvoelklingen (Ochodno), Szczytno, Warminsko‐Mazurskie, German Empire (Poland) 533653 210255 Ochódno Ortelsburg Ostpreussen Achthuben (Pieszkowo), Bartoszyce , Warminsko‐Mazurskie, German Empire (Poland) 541237 203008 Pieszkowo Mohrungen Ostpreussen Adamsdorf (Adamowo), Brodnica, Kujawsko‐Pomorskie, German Empire (Poland) 532554 190921 Adamowo Strasburg I. Westpr. Westpreussen Adamsdorf (Maly Rudnik), Grudziadz, Kujawsko‐Pomorskie, German Empire (Poland) 532440 184251 Mały Rudnik Graudenz Westpreussen Adamsdorf (Sulimierz), Mysliborz, Zachodniopomorskie, German Empire (Poland) 525754 150057 Sulimierz Soldin Brandenburg Adamsgut (Jadaminy), Olsztyn, Warminsko‐Mazurskie, German
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGICKÝ PLÁN VÝZKUMU ČGS NA LÉTA 2012 - 2015 Zpráva Za Rok 2015
    STRATEGICKÝ PLÁN VÝZKUMU ČGS NA LÉTA 2012 - 2015 Zpráva za rok 2015 Sestavili: J. Pertoldová, J. Frýda, M. Novák, L. Rukavičková, B. Kříbek, V. Hladík, D. Čápová, H. Breiterová, J. Pašava, P. Štěpánek Česká geologická služba/ Czech Geological Survey Klárov 131/ 3, 118 21 Praha 1 Geologická 6, 152 00 Praha 5 Kostelní 26, 170 00 Praha 7 Leitnerova 22, 602 00 Brno Dačického náměstí 11, 284 01 Kutná Hora IČO 00025798, DIČ CZ 00025798 www.geology.cz Leden 2016 Úvod Zpracoval: Jan Pašava Po úspěšném završení výzkumného záměru MZP0002579801 „Vědy o Zemi pro společnost 21. století: Od regionálních výzkumů přes geologická rizika po globální změny“, řešeného v letech 2005–2010 (s prodloužením do r. 2011), a v souvislosti s měnícími se národními a globálními prioritami Česká geologická služba (ČGS) v průběhu roku 2011 adaptovala a optimalizovala strategické směry svého rozvoje, který vyústil ve schválení Strategického plánu výzkumu na léta 2012–2015. V průběhu 21. století se geovědy vyvinuly ve skutečný interdisciplinární obor, který využívá spolupráce s ostatními vědeckými disciplínami včetně biologických, materiálových, informatických a sociálních věd. Komplexní zpracování a efektivní poskytování geovědních informací získává stále větší podíl na řešení klíčových a pro naši společnost mnohdy existenčních otázek. V první fázi přípravy Strategického plánu výzkumu byla redefinována vize ČGS: Vizí České geologické služby je upevňovat pozici pilíře českého státu v poskytování geovědních informací pro rozhodování ve věcech přírodních zdrojů, rizik a udržitelného rozvoje a na základě vysoké odbornosti posilovat svoje postavení vůdčí výzkumné instituce v oboru věd o Zemi. S využitím obdobných strategických materiálů rozvoje výzkumu schválených na národní, mezinárodní i globální úrovni, rozvíjením široké interní diskuse odborníků reprezentujících různé geovědní obory a finální redakcí tohoto strategického dokumentu ČGS, jsou jeho hlavní témata následující: 1.
    [Show full text]