European Union Democracy Promotion in Central Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Union Democracy Promotion in Central Asia European Union Democracy Promotion in Central Asia Implementation in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Aizhan Sharshenova Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) The University of Leeds School of Politics and International Studies December 2015 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Aizhan (Aijan) Sharshenova to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2015 The University of Leeds and Aizhan (Aijan) Sharshenova - ii - Acknowledgements I owe my deepest gratitude to my supervisors - Professor Gordon Crawford and Dr Simon Lightfoot. Gordon and Simon provided excellent advice and the kindest support throughout this journey. I would also like to thank the following organisations and an individual, whose financial contributions were of great help: The School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds, for the International fees scholarship; The Open Society Foundations (OSF) and Mr George Soros for the Global Supplementary Grant Programme Scholarship provided in 2011-2014; The University Association for Contemporary European Studies (UACES) for the financial support of the research trip to Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan in 2013. In addition I am grateful to the anonymous interviewees in Bishkek, Brussels and Astana for their honesty, openness and kindness. It has been a great pleasure to meet each of them and learn of their perspectives and views. Finally, I wish to thank my Mom and Matthew, whose unconditional love and support are immeasurable and invaluable. My special thanks goes to Matthew for encouraging me during the most intense research periods. I dedicate this thesis to Mom, Ainura Sharshenova, a devoted educator, who has inspired me to pursue this path a long time ago. l - iii - Abstract The EU has made the area of democracy, human rights, rule of law and good governance a priority cooperation area under the framework of the EU Strategy towards Central Asia. The inclusion of strong normative elements into the Strategy was both due to the EU’s commitment to democratic principles and the lack of democratisation progress in Central Asia. This thesis examines two interrelated questions: To what extent has EU democracy promotion in Central Asia been successful, and why? Focusing on the implementation of EU democracy promotion instruments the thesis has made three original contributions. First, it adds to the existing research on democracy promotion mechanisms and provides a comprehensive analytical framework for evaluation of democracy promotion, inclusive of factors which may facilitate or impede democracy promotion in Central Asia. Second, this thesis demonstrates the validity of a holistic approach to analysing factors impeding democracy promotion. It acknowledges that a variety of diverse factors affect external democracy promotion and their impact can vary as international, regional and domestic conditions change. Third, two original case studies were presented and analysed with taking into consideration relevant contextual conditions, which might affect the design, implementation and outcomes of EU democracy promotion. Case study approach offers a highly contextual solution to examining external democracy promotion. It allows for a depth of analysis and adds to the existing body of literature, which usually either focuses on individual democracy promotion projects or provides a shallow overview of EU activities in Central Asia. The thesis focused on the stable and wealthy authoritarian Kazakhstan and poorer Kyrgyzstan, which is prone to political instability but also to democratic openings. The case studies represented the country with more strategic importance for the EU (Kazakhstan) and the country with less strategic importance for the EU (Kyrgyzstan) in order to see how non normative interests interfere with normative interests l - iv - Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... ii Abstract ..................................................................................................... iiiii Table of Contents ....................................................................................... iv List of Tables ............................................................................................ vvi List of Graphs ............................................................................................ vii Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 EU Democracy Promotion in Central Asia: a Challenging Task in an Unfamiliar Region ................................................................. 2 1.2 Research Aims and Objectives ....................................................... 5 1.3 Research Design ............................................................................. 7 1.4 Data Collection .............................................................................. 11 1.5 Research Issues ............................................................................ 13 1.6 Thesis Structure and Final Remarks ............................................. 16 Chapter 2 External Democracy Promotion: Promoters and Targets .... 19 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 19 2.2 Democratisation Studies ............................................................... 21 2.3 European Union Studies ............................................................... 33 2.4 Central Asian Studies .................................................................... 44 2.5 Conclusion..................................................................................... 50 Chapter 3 Local Context ........................................................................... 54 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 54 3.2 General Overview .......................................................................... 55 3.3 Transition and Democracy............................................................. 61 3.4 Regime Stability ............................................................................ 69 3.5 Economic Development ................................................................ 79 3.6 Conclusion..................................................................................... 88 Chapter 4 EU Democracy Promotion in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan ................................................................................................. 91 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 91 4.2 EU Actors and their Interests in Central Asia ................................ 93 4.3 Legal and Normative Framework of EU Democracy Promotion in Central Asia ........................................................................... 107 4.4 Implementation in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan ........................... 115 l - v - 4.5 Conclusion .................................................................................. 125 Chapter 5 Evaluation of EU Democracy Promotion in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan ....................................................................................... 128 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 128 5.2 Evaluation of the Strategic Calculation Mechanism..................... 133 5.3 Evaluation of the Normative Suasion Mechanism ....................... 148 5.4 Evaluation of the Democratic Empowerment Mechanism ........... 157 5.5 Evaluation of the Democratisation Progress in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan ......................................................................... 161 5.6 Conclusion .................................................................................. 170 Chapter 6 Factors Impeding EU Democracy Promotion in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan ................................................................... 173 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 173 6.2 EU Factors .................................................................................. 174 6.3 Local Factors ............................................................................... 186 6.4 Regional Factors ......................................................................... 195 6.5 Conclusion .................................................................................. 211 Chapter 7 Conclusion ............................................................................. 213 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 213 7.2 To what Extent has EU Democracy Promotion been Successful in Central Asia? ....................................................... 214 7.3 Why has EU Democracy Promotion not been Successful in Central Asia? ............................................................................. 220 7.4 Avenues for Future Research ..................................................... 223 7.5 Academic Contribution ...............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Rising Sinophobia in Kyrgyzstan: the Role of Political Corruption
    RISING SINOPHOBIA IN KYRGYZSTAN: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DOĞUKAN BAŞ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EURASIAN STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2020 Approval of the thesis: RISING SINOPHOBIA IN KYRGYZSTAN: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION submitted by DOĞUKAN BAŞ in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Eurasian Studies, the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Dean Graduate School of Social Sciences Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU BONNENFANT Head of Department Eurasian Studies Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL Supervisor Political Science and Public Administration Examining Committee Members: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU BONNENFANT (Head of the Examining Committee) Middle East Technical University International Relations Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL (Supervisor) Middle East Technical University Political Science and Public Administration Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya BILETSKA Karabük University International Relations I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Doğukan Baş Signature : iii ABSTRACT RISING SINOPHOBIA IN KYRGYZSTAN: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION BAŞ, Doğukan M.Sc., Eurasian Studies Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL September 2020, 131 pages In recent years, one of the major problems that Kyrgyzstan witnesses is rising Sinophobia among the local people due to problems related with increasing Chinese economic presence in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus
    Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 6 NO. 6 23 MARCH 2005 Searchable Archives with over 1,000 articles at http://www.cacianalyst.org ANALYTICAL ARTICLES: KYRGYZ GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL SLIPS, FIELD REPORTS: CREATING DANGERS AND OPPORTUNITIES Aya Telekova A ‘TULIP’ REVOLUTION DEVELOPS IN KYR- GYZSTAN? DID RUSSIA ESCALATE TENSION IN CHECH- Maral Madi NYA BY ASSASSINATING MASKHADOV? Murad Batal Al-Shishani NO PROGRESS IN NURISTAN Daan van der Schriek GEORGIA’S DIPLOMATIC OFFENSIVE PROBES MOSCOW’S REAL INTENTIONS ON SMUGGLING AND CORRUPTION CON- BASES TINUE TO PLAGUE GEORGIA Jaba Devdariani Kakha Jibladze ARMENIA’S FOREIGN POLICY: TOWARDS CENTRAL ASIAN EFFORTS TO COMBAT REAL COMPLEMENTARITY HIV/AIDS Tevan Poghosyan Nazgul Baktybekova NEWS DIGEST Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 6 NO. 6 23 MARCH 2005 Contents Analytical Articles KYRGYZ GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL SLIPS, CREATING DANGERS AND OPPORTUNITIES 3 Aya Telekova DID RUSSIA ESCALATE TENSION IN CHECHNYA BY ASSASSINATING MASKHADOV? 5 Murad Batal Al-Shishani GEORGIA’S DIPLOMATIC OFFENSIVE PROBES MOSCOW’S REAL INTENTIONS ON BASES 8 Jaba Devdariani ARMENIA’S FOREIGN POLICY: TOWARDS REAL COMPLEMENTARITY 10 Tevan Poghosyan Field Reports A ‘TULIP’ REVOLUTION DEVELOPS IN KYRGYZSTAN? 13 Maral Madi NO PROGRESS IN NURISTAN 15 Daan van der Schriek SMUGGLING AND CORRUPTION CONTINUE TO PLAGUE GEORGIA 16 Kakha Jibladze CENTRAL ASIAN EFFORTS TO COMBAT HIV/AIDS 17 Nazgul Baktybekova News Digest 19 EDITORIAL PRINCIPLES The Analyst is an English language global Web journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing the Central Asia-Caucasus region. It serves to link the business, governmental, journalistic and scholarly communities and is the global voice of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, The Johns Hopkins University-The Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia' S1)Tev()Iutj
    --,- Central Asia' s1)tev()Iutj By Daan van der Schriek nessed the revolutionary events in Osh as say- the parliament. This set a bad precedent. In sub~~ ing: "I had an impression that the opposition sequent years, Akayev gave himself more and The Kyrgyz revolution differs dramatically members threw stones at each other." more powers, not to push through reforms, but I from thoseplayed out in Georgia and the This is an important difference from events in to silence criticism. Yet, in the short term, Ukraine. Its lack of leadership hasgiven Georgia and Ukraine: The Kyrgyz revolution reforms didn't bring prosperity. This created dis- way to a moreviolent character lacks leadership and, as a consequence, is more sent, and Akayev became unpopular. violent. Hopefully, however, the opposition will Then, during the. 2000 presidential cam- ETTER not be too softon your opposi- soon agree on a policy and keep its supporters in paign, a credible challenger appeared - Felix tion. This is what the leaders must check. They are th~ authorities now, after state Kulov, a former vice president who had fallen B think whose countries border buildings were stormed and Akayev fled on Kyrgyzstan, which is'in the grips of revolution Thursday. What did Kyrgyzstan, an "island of or, depending on your view, of thugs. Some democracy" in a sea of Central Asian dictatorship, How did this 'island of democra have called the protests sparked by disputed as it was called in the early 19908,do to deserve elections the "Tulip Revolution", after this? Being more liberal than its neighbours is, of Central Asian dictatorships Georgia's Rose Revolution and Ukraine's paradoxically, part of the answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia
    U.S. ONLINE TRAINING FOR OSCE, INCLUDING REACT Module 6. Central Asia This module introduces you to central Asia and the OSCE’s work in: • Kazakhstan • Turkmenistan • Uzbekistan • Kyrgyzstan • Tajikistan 1 Table of Contents Overview. 3 Central Asia. 4 States before the Soviet period. 7 International organizations. 9 Caspian Oil. 10 Getting the oil out. 12 Over-fishing and pollution. 14 Water. 15 Kazakhstan. 18 Geography. 19 People. 20 Government. 21 Before Russian rule. 22 Under Russian and Soviet rule. 23 From Perestroika to independence. 25 Domestic politics. 26 Ethnic relations. 31 Internal security. 32 Foreign relations. 33 Kazakhstan culture. 40 Turkmenistan. 42 Geography. 43 People. 44 Government. 45 Basic geography. 46 Historical background. 47 Domestic politics. 48 Ethnic relations. 53 Foreign relations. 54 Turkmenistan culture. 58 Uzbekistan. 63 Geography. 64 People. 65 Government. 66 Basic geography. 67 Historical background. 68 The Muslim civilization of Bukhara and Samarkand. 69 The Turko-Persian civilization. 70 Under Russian and Soviet rule. 71 Perestroika and independence. 72 Domestic politics. 73 Economics and politics. 77 Islam and politics. 78 MODULE 6. Central Asia 2 Ethnic relations. 80 Foreign relations. 81 Uzbekistan culture. 85 Kyrgyzstan. 89 Geography. 90 People. 91 Government. 92 Basic geography. 93 Historical background. 94 The Osh conflict and the ‘Silk Revolution’. 95 Ethnic relations. 96 Domestic politics. 97 Foreign relations. 106 Culture. 111 Tajikistan. 116 Geography. 117 People. 118 Government. 119 Four regions of Tajikistan. 120 Historical background. 121 The civil war. 122 Nature of the war. 124 Negotiations and the peace process. 125 Politics, economics and foreign affairs. 130 Domestic politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Parties of Power? Elite Strategies and Institutional Choice in Post-Soviet Eurasia by Eli Adam Feiman a Dissertation Submit
    Why Parties of Power? Elite Strategies and Institutional Choice in Post-Soviet Eurasia by Eli Adam Feiman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Pauline Jones-Luong, Chair Professor Anna M. Grzymała-Busse Associate Professor Allen D. Hicken Professor Ronald G. Suny To my family ii Acknowledgements My first thanks go to the faculty at Brown University and the University of Michigan for their mentorship. I am grateful to Melani Cammett for early assistance with research design and to the late Alan Zuckerman for conversations that broadened my understanding of political parties. I thank Allen Hicken and Anna Grzymala-Busse for incisive comments at all stages of this project. I very much appreciated Ronald Suny’s regional expertise and his historical perspective. I offer Pauline Jones-Luong my heartfelt thanks for taking me on as her student and for being an unflinching source of support, encouragement, and inspiration for the past ten years. This project would not have been possible without generous financial support from the International Research and Exchange Board (IREX), the American Research Institute of the South Caucasus (ARISC), the Dolores Zohrab Liebmann Fund, as well as Brown University and the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. This project has benefitted from feedback provided at the Davis Center Postcommunist Politics and Economics Workshop, the 2009 Institute for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, the Caucasus Resource Research Center/American Councils Works in Progress lecture series, the Comparative Politics Workshop at the University of Michigan, and the Eurasia Collective Rackham Interdisciplinary Workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • MONITORING of ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE ABUSES DURING PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS in the KYRGYZ REPUBLIC February-March 2005”
    “Transparency International - Kyrgyzstan” “Transparency International – Kyrgyzstan” PROJECT “MONITORING OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE ABUSES DURING PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC February-March 2005” 2005 2 “Transparency International - Kyrgyzstan” CONTENTS CONTENTS 3 CHAPTER 1. METHODOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF THE MONITORING PROJECT 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND METHODS 7 A) Introduction 7 B) Project Goals and Targets 7 C) Project General Characteristic 7 D) Methods of Project Implementation 8 E) Results 9 1.2. ABUSE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE. ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE TYPOLOGY. 9 A) Role and Significance of Administrative Resource Abuses 9 B) Institutional resource 9 C) Media resource 9 D) Budget resource 10 E) “Coercive” Resource 10 CHAPTER 2. LEGAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT 11 2.1 Elections of Deputies to the Kyrgyz Republic Parliament 11 a) Elections dates 12 b) Election Commissions 12 c) Preparation and conduction of elections of deputies to the Kyrgyz Republic Parliament 16 2.2 Organization, Procedure of Voting and Definition of its Results 16 a) Premises for voting 16 b) Certificate of striking off the list for voting at elections 16 c) Voting paper 17 d) Voting procedure 17 e) Procedure of prescheduled voting and voting outside voting premises 18 f) Definition of voting results 18 2.3 Agitation at Elections 18 a) Agitation period 19 b) Agitation by television, radio, through printing mass media, agitation by means of mass events, dissemination of agitation materials 19 c) Inadmissibility of abuses of the right for agitation 20 2.4 Financing of Elections 21 a) Financial support of elections preparation and conduction 21 b) Election funds 21 c) Control of spending funds allocated for conduction of elections 22 2.5 Responsibility for Violation of Suffrages 22 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst Vol 5, No 22
    Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 5 NO. 22 17 NOVEMBER 2004 Searchable Archives with over 1,000 articles at http://www.cacianalyst.org ANALYTICAL ARTICLES: NATO DEEPENS ITS PARTNERSHIP WITH CENTRAL ASIA Roger N. McDermott FIELD REPORTS: GEORGIA: REVOLUTION HAS ENDED, KEY KAZAKH SECURITY SERVICES TRUMPET REFORMS STILL AHEAD VICTORY OVER “AL-QAIDA MEMBERS” Jaba Devdariani Marat Yermukanov INDEPENDENT ELECTRONIC MEDIA NETWORK GEORGIA’S BATTLE WITH CORRUPTION IN UZBEKISTANSET TO CHALLENGE STATE TV IN Kakha Jibladze ELECTION COVERAGE S. Frederick Starr SECURITY MEASURES INCRESASE AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY – CENTRAL ASIA POLITICAL PARTIES, REGIONALISM, AND THE Dariya Alieva ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN KYRGYZSTAN Aya Telekova PRIVATIZATION OF KYRGYZSTAN’S ENERGY SECTOR UNDER HEATED DEBATE Nazgul Baktybekova NEWS DIGEST Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 5 NO. 22 17 NOVEMBER 2004 Contents Analytical Articles NATO DEEPENS ITS PARTNERSHIP WITH CENTRAL ASIA 3 Roger N. McDermott GEORGIA: REVOLUTION HAS ENDED, KEY REFORMS STILL AHEAD 5 Jaba Devdariani INDEPENDENT ELECTRONIC MEDIA NETWORK IN UZBEKISTAN 8 SET TO CHALLENGE STATE TV IN ELECTION COVERAGE S. Frederick Starr POLITICAL PARTIES, REGIONALISM AND THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN 11 IN KYRGYZSTAN Aya Telekova Field Reports KAZAKH SECURITY SERVICES TRUMPET VICTORY OVER “AL-QAIDA MEMBERS” 14 Marat Yermukanov GEORGIA’S BATTLE WITH CORRUPTION 16 Kakha Jibladze SECURITY MEASURES INCRESASE AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY – CENTRAL ASIA 17 Dariya Alieva PRIVATIZATION OF KYRGYZSTAN’S ENERGY SECTOR UNDER HEATED DEBATE 19 Nazgul Baktybekova News Digest 21 EDITORIAL PRINCIPLES The Analyst is an English language global Web journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing the Central Asia-Caucasus region. It serves to link the business, governmental, journalistic and scholarly communities and is the global voice of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, The Johns Hopkins University-The Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Authoritarian Institution Building
    Authoritarian Institution Building Electoral Politics and Ruling Party Formation in Post-Revolutionary Kyrgyzstan Kevin Koehler Research and Teaching Fellow OSCE Academy, Bishkek Kyrgyz Republic [email protected] Abstract This paper analyzes President Bakiyev’s post-revolutionary strategy of consolidating political power in Kyrgyzstan. Against the background of renewed elite conflict and political protest in 2006 and 2007, Bakiyev initiated a project of institutional reform that aimed at centralizing political power. The constitutional changes of 2007, the creation of Ak Zhol as a single pro- presidential “party of power,” and the early 2007 parliamentary elections are part of this project of authoritarian institution building. Ultimately, this policy aims at reducing the volatility of elite alignments in Kyrgyzstan by stabilizing a presidential support coalition in the form of Ak Zhol and monopolizing access to the formal political system. Introduction 1 Initially hailed as signifying the advent of people’s power to Central Asia (Olcott 2005), the 2005 “Tulip Revolution” in Kyrgyzstan (or the “March events” as the ouster of President Akayev is more commonly – and perhaps more prudently – referred to in Kyrgyzstan) has since ceased to evoke much enthusiasm among observers. 2 Almost immediately following the tumultuous events of March 2005, analysts began to caution against interpreting what had happened in the framework of the post-communist “Colored Revolutions” that had led to the overthrow of unpopular presidents in Serbia, Georgia and Ukraine. Pointing to the rather limited nature of change in the Kyrgyz case, it has been maintained that the Tulip Revolution would better be described as leading to a “transfer of power,” rather than regime change (Radnitz 2006), and that the events should be characterized as a coup d’état, rather than a revolution (Abazov 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Elections, Parties, and Democratization in Postcommunist States
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2013 Who's Attending the Party? Elections, Parties, and Democratization in Postcommunist States Jonathan Windle Riggs Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Riggs, Jonathan Windle, "Who's Attending the Party? Elections, Parties, and Democratization in Postcommunist States" (2013). Dissertations. 544. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/544 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2013 Jonathan Windle Riggs LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO WHO’S ATTENDING THE PARTY? ELECTIONS, PARTIES, AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN POSTCOMMUNIST STATES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE BY JONATHAN W. RIGGS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2013 Copyright by Jonathan W. Riggs, 2013. All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Abstinence Over Absence
    Abstinence over absence The 2010 South Kyrgyzstan ethnic clashes and the OSCE’s ability to predict and prevent conflict MA Thesis in European Studies Graduate School for Humanities Universiteit van Amsterdam Author: Ieke Noyon Student number: 11933267 Main supervisor: Dr. A.M. Kalinovsky Second supervisor: Dr. A.K. Bustanov June, 2019 2 Table of contents 3 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Spontaneous, but not unexpected: the 2010 South Kyrgyzstan ethnic clashes ........................... 6 1.2 The OSCE… ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 … and its crisis management abilities ........................................................................................ 8 1.4 The OSCE’s role in the 2010 South Kyrgyzstan ethnic clashes ............................................... 10 2. A COMPREHENSIVE ANSWER TO A NARROWED-DOWN SECURITY ............................... 13 2.1 The framework of international security organisations ............................................................ 13 2.1.1 International institutions in International Relations .......................................................... 13 2.1.2 Historical approaches to security .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Republic Page 1 of 21
    Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Kyrgyz Republic Page 1 of 21 Kyrgyz Republic Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 11, 2008 The Kyrgyz Republic's October 2007 constitution defines the country as a sovereign, unitary, democratic, social state based on the rule of law. The country has a population of approximately 5.3 million. The country has an elected president, an appointed prime minister and cabinet, and an elected parliament. The July 2005 elections of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev, following the March 2005 overthrow of the Akayev regime, marked tangible progress toward meeting international election standards according to OSCE election observers. Only a dozen of approximately 100 registered political parties played a significant role. According to independent election observers, the December 16 nationwide parliamentary election failed to meet many of the country's international commitments and was marred by significant obstacles for opposition parties and the use of government resources to benefit specific political interests. Following the parliamentary elections, three parties received seats in the legislative body, with the president's newly formed Ak Jol party obtaining a majority 71 of the 90 seats. The new constitution established a greater role for political parties, with all seats in the parliament elected by party lists, and empowered the president to appoint the prime minister and other heads of government agencies, executive bodies, and
    [Show full text]
  • A Conditional Theory of the 'Political Resource Curse:' Oil, Autocrats, and Strategic Contexts
    A Conditional Theory of the ‘Political Resource Curse:’ Oil, Autocrats, and Strategic Contexts by Anar Kamil Ahmadov A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government in the DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT of the LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE London, United Kingdom September 2011 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 88,508 words. 2 Abstract A burgeoning literature argues that the abundance of oil in developing countries strengthens autocratic rule and erodes democracy. However, extant studies either show the average cross-national correlation between oil and political regime or develop particularistic accounts that do not easily lend themselves to theorizing. Consequently, we know little of the causal mechanisms that potentially link oil wealth to undemocratic outcomes and the conditions that would help explain the ultimate, not average, effect of oil on political regime. This study develops a conditional theory of the “political resource curse.” It does so by undertaking a statistical reassessment of the relationship between oil wealth and political regime and a nuanced qualitative examination of a set of carefully selected cases in order to contribute to developing an adequate account of causal mechanisms that transmit and conditions that shape the relationship between oil abundance and autocracy.
    [Show full text]