<<

Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction or distribution or commercial use

This article was originally published in the Encyclopedia of Stress Second Edition, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution,

sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator.

All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at:

http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial

Spencer R L and Bland S T (2007), Hippocampal Neurons. In: George Fink, (Editor- in-Chief) Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition, volume 2, pp. 311-320. Oxford: Academic Press. Hippocampal Neurons 311

simplex virus, and cytomegalovirus. Pediatric Clinics of varicella-zoster virus latency in ganglia. Journal of

North America 51, 889–908. Neurovirology 9, 194–204.

Knipe, D. M. and Howley, P. M. (eds.) (2001). Fields virol- Moore, P. S. and Chang, Y. (2003). Kaposi’s sarcoma- ogy (4th edn.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & associated herpesvirus immunoevasion and tumori- Wilkins. genesis: two sides of the same coin? Annual Review of Mitchell, B. M., Bloom, D. C., Cohrs, R. J., Gilden, D. H. Microbiology 57, 609–639. and Kennedy, P. G. (2003). Herpes simplex virus-1 and

Hippocampal Neurons

R L Spencer and S T Bland binding of metabotropic receptors at the University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA membrane surface. ã 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Neuropil Brain region that consists primarily of neuronal processess (dendrites and This article is a revision of the previous edition article by axons) rather than neuronal cell bodies. R D Brinton and T W Berger, volume 2, pp 364–371, Spatial learning Learning tasks in which optimal perfor-

ã 2000, Elsevier Inc. mance requires that the organism has learned the relative spatial relationship between objects in the environment. Spatial learning can be demonstrated by Overview tasks in which the organism is able to Hippocampal Formation select the most direct route to a location Laminar Organization of and that it has been to before or, alternatively, Lammelar Organization (Trisynaptic Circuit) of Dentate by tasks in which the organism avoids Gyrus and Hippocampus revisiting places that it has been to before.

Principal Neurons Interneurons Overview Intrinsic and Extrinsic Neural Connections Neurochemistry The hippocampal formation consists of the hippo- Neuroplasticity campus and the closely associated dentate gyrus

Hippocampal Function and . The hippocampal formation first attracted attention as a primitive region of the cortex that had an architecturally simple and orderly cellular Glossary organization. Strikingly detailed drawings of the mi-

Adenylyl A protein enzyme that when activated, croscopic organization of the hippocampal formation cyclase for example by a G-protein, catalyzes the were provided by Ramo´ n y Cajal in the late 1800s (Figure 1). This structure is dominated by the orderly formation of an intracellular second- messenger molecule, cyclic adenosine alignment of two principal neuronal cell types: pyra- monophosphateAuthor's (cAMP). Personalmidal cells and granule cells.Copy Moreover, the principal Cation channel A protein complex embedded in a cells of the hippocampal formation were found to be cell’s membrane that allows positively interconnected in such a way as to produce a simple þ þ þ charged ions (e.g., Na ,K,orCa2 ) intrinsic neurocircuit (the trisynaptic circuit). Interest to pass through the membrane. in the hippocampal formation intensified when, G-proteins Guanine nucleotide (guanosine triphos- based on human amnesic cases, it was found to be phate, GTP, and guanosine diphosphate, essential for the formation of new episodic memories GDP) binding proteins that associate with the intracellular portion of metabo- and the acquisition of declarative facts. The intense study of the hippocampus has yielded the first trobic receptors. G-protein alterations are the first step in a cascade of intra- characterized cellular functional response (long- cellular molecular changes triggered by term potentiation) believed to reflect the fundamen- neurotransmitter or hormone (ligand) tal neuroplasticity underlying memory formation.

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

312 Hippocampal Neurons

three distinct layers. Extensively associated with the

hippocampal formation, in terms of interconnections, is the adjacent six-layer . The hippocampus and its interleaved partner, the dentate

gyrus, are two phylogenetically primitive cortical structures that are buried underneath the corti- cal mantle. In the human brain, these two enfolded

sheets of rudimentary cortex are located within the (Figure 2). In the rodent brain, these structures extend more dorsal-anteriorly. The dorsal portion of the hippocampus is located immediately

beneath the corpus callosum and has an anterior ex- tension that approaches the septal region (Figure 3). The most caudal extent of the hippocampus is located

in the ventral half of the caudal portion of rodent forebrain. Dissected out of a rat brain, the combined dentate

gyrus and hippocampus are somewhat banana-shaped. The longitudinal axis of this structure is often referred to as the septal-temporal axis of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus. The rostral approximately two-thirds of

this structure is known as the dorsal hippocampus, and the caudal third is known as the ventral hippocampus. This structure is usually studied and depicted in the

tranverse/cross-sectional plane (Figure 3). The cellular organization of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in mammals is remarkably consistent throughout its Figure 1 Drawing of a transverse section of the hippocampal longitudinal extent. Recent anatomical studies, how- formation highlighting the principal cells (e.g. B, D, G, h), their ever, have demonstrated important differences in in- interconnections and presumed flow of neural impulses (arrows).

Drawing by S. Ramo´n y Cajal, first published in 1911 (Ramo´nY trinsic and extrinsic connections within the dorsal and ventral hippocampus. These differences may have im- Cajal, Histologie du systeme nerveux de lHomme et des Verte- bres. Paris: A. Maloine, 1911). portant functional significance. For example, there is some evidence that the dorsal hippocampus is more important for spatial learning and memory and

that the ventral hippocampus selectively contributes Subsequent study of the hippocampus has revealed a to fear and other emotion-dependent behaviors and range of neuroplasticity phenomena that include learning. dynamic changes in neuronal arborization, spine den- sity, and synapse formation. Investigations in recent Laminar Organization of Dentate Gyrus years have determined that is a routine and Hippocampus feature of the adult dentate gyrus portion of the hippocampal formation. The characterization of these The principal cell body layer of the hippocampal forms of hippocampal neuroplasticity has revolutio- formation consists primarily of bodies nized recent neuroscienceAuthor's with the discovery Personal that (hippocampus and subiculum) Copy or bodies these neuroplastic changes are not restricted to criti- (dentate gyrus). The surrounding neuropil zones pri- cal developmental periods or recovery from brain marily comprise the proximal principal cells’ den- injury but are a normal daily occurrence that persists drites and axons and the nerve terminals of extrinsic throughout the life span. and intrinsic afferents. This laminar organization can be easily visualized when examining microscopically

Hippocampal Formation a transverse section of dentate gyrus and hippocam- pus (Figure 4a). Anatomists have subdivided the neu-

Each of the components of the hippocampal forma- ropil zones into different strata, based primarily on tion is characterized by a single principal cell body microscopic differences in the principal cell processes layer sandwiched between two zones of neuropil, and the afferents and efferents present within each yielding a simplified version of cortex with only strata (Figure 4b). Note that each of these cortical

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

Hippocampal Neurons 313

Figure 2 Relative location of hippocampal formation in human brain. The hippocampus and its interleaved partner, the dentate gyrus, reside beneath the cortical surface in the temporal lobe. An enlarged transverse slice of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus is depicted in the lower left portion of the figure. From Squire, L. R. and Kandel, E. R. (2000), Memory, from mind to molecules, New York: Scientific American Library.

sheets has been folded in half along its longitudinal CA1, CA2, and CA3 (drawing on the Latin name axis. Therefore, when we view a cross section of this for the hippocampus, cornus Ammonus, Ammon’s structure in the ratAuthor's brain, the orderly aligned principal Personalhorn). The CA3 region Copy is adjacent to the dentate cell bodies form a C-shaped (hippocampus) or gyrus, and the CA1 region is adjacent to the sub- V-shaped (dentate gyrus) formation. As is evident iculum. The smaller CA2 region has morphological, when we view a horizontal cross section of ventral phenotypical, and connectional features that overlap hippocampus, one edge of the hippocampal sheet is with those of the CA3 and CA1 subregions, but in adjacent to the subiculum and entorhinal cortex combination makes for a clearly distinct functional (Figure 4c–d). The other edge of the hippocampal zone of cells. The granule cells in the dentate gyrus sheet is tucked inside the two folds of the dentate are relatively uniform throughout the V-shaped for- gyrus. The C-shaped formation of pyramidal cell mation in terms of morphology, innervation, and bodies in the hippocampus is subdivided into three projections. The two folds of dentate gyrus giving subfields based on morphological and intercon- rise to the V-shaped formation are commonly re- nection distinctions. These subfields are designated ferred to as the enclosed and free blades, or the

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

314 Hippocampal Neurons

CA1

sc S CA3

mf pp

DG

Se

Trans

T

Figure 3 Relative location of hippocampal formation in rat brain. The hippocampus (including CA1 and CA3 subregions) and dentate gyrus (DG) form a banana-like structure with one end of the longitudinal axis located dorsal-rostrally near the septal (Se) region and the other end located ventral-caudally near the temporal (T) pole of the rat forebrain. An enlarged transverse slice is depicted in the upper portion of the figure. mf, mossy fiber; pp, ; sc, ; S, subiculum. From Amaral, D.G. and Witter, M.P. (1989) The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of the anatomical data. Neuroscience 31, 571–591.

suprapyramidal and infrapyramidal blades, of the and form synapses on granule neuron dendrites dentate gyrus. Recent studies indicate that there are (synapse 1). The granule neurons project (mossy some clear differences in the relative afferent fiber pathway) to CA3 and form synapses on the connections to the two blades of the dentate gyrus apical dendrite of CA3 pyramidal neurons within as well as discriminable tendencies in their projection the stratum lucidum (synapse 2). A collateral axonal to CA3 subregions. The intervening space between branch of the CA3 pyramidal neurons projects the two granule cell body-forming blades of the den- (Schaffer collateral) to CA1 and forms synapses on tate gyrus is known as the hilus or polymorphic basilar and apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neu- region of the dentate gyrus. rons (synapse 3). The primary output from this cir-

cuit, and from the hippocampus overall, proceeds Lammelar Organization (Trisynaptic from CA1 neurons to the adjacent subiculum and Circuit) of Dentate Gyrus and entorhinal cortex as well as to subcortical structures. More recent investigations have determined that Hippocampus there is considerable divergence and convergence with- Significantly, many of the intrahippocampal neural in the longitudinal plane of connections between the connections areAuthor's maintained within a narrow cross-Personalentorhinal cortex and theCopy dentate gyrus and between sectional area (lammelae). A simple unidirectional CA3 pyramidal neurons and other CA3 and CA1 cells. trisynaptic connection among the components of the Only the mossy fiber connections between the dentate hippocampal formation was deduced by Ramo´ ny gyrus and CA3 are predominantly restricted to a cross-

Cajal based on microscopic architecture (Figure 1). sectional lammelae. Nevertheless, a fairly thin cross Around 1970, Andersen and colleagues provided elec- section of the dentate gyrus and hippocampus contains trophysiological evidence to support a predominantly a number of intact cells of each trisynaptic circuit lammelar organization of hippocampal function. component. Therefore, the hippocampal formation

This trisynaptic circuit (Figure 5a) begins with is ideally suited for ex vivo study, in which a 250- to pyramidal neurons predominantly localized in layer 500-mm cross-section of this structure contains an II of entorhinal cortex. These cells project (perforant electophysiologically functional trisynaptic circuit. pathway) to both blades of the dentate gyrus Consequently, with appropriate bath conditions for

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

Hippocampal Neurons 315

cing

CA1 ec so

C sps DGlb A2 cc sr hf df spd slm FC o C alv m A3 sg slu po sg DGmb alv mo (a) (b) sm VL

fi

so pc1 CA3 sl sr CA2 sl-m

CA1 DG PoDG GL ML I PrS II/III S PER ab PaS V/VI

IV III II I

EC (c) (d) Figure 4 Laminar organization of rat hippocampal formation. a, Photomicrograph of histologically stained tissue of transverse section of the dorsal hippocampus (coronal plane); b, corresponding line drawing; c, photomicrograph of histologically stained tissue of transverse section of the ventral hippocampus (horizontal plane); d, corresponding line drawing. The strata of the hippocampus shown are stratum oriens (so), pyramidal cell body layer (spd, sps, or pcl), stratum lucidum (sl), stratum radiatum (sr), and stratum lacunosum-moleculare (slm). The strata of the dentate gyrus shown are the molecular layer (mo), granule cell body layer (gl or sg), and the hilus or polymorphic region (po). The tightly packed and orderly aligned pyramidal and granule cell bodies result in a darkly stained C- or V-shaped formation in the hippocampus or dentate gyrus, respectively. ab, angular bundle; alv, alveus; cc, corpus callosum; cing, cingulum; DGlb, dentate gyrus lateral or enclosed blade; Dgmb, dentate gyrus medial or free blade; EC, entorhinal cortex (layers I–VI); fi, fimbria of ; hf, hippocampal fissure; PaS, parasubiculum; PER, perirhinal cortex; PrS, presubiculum (layers I–III); S, subiculum; VL, lateral ventricle. Panels a and b from Swanson. L. W. (2004), Brain maps: structure of the rat brain (3rd edn.), Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.; panels c and d from Witter, M. P. and Amaral, D. G. (2004), Hippocampal formation, In: Paxinos, G. (ed.) The rat nervous system (3rd edn.), pp. 635–704. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

neuronal survival, a cross-sectional brain slice of the each cell. The base of the cell is defined by the hippocampus and dentate gyrus maintains many func- surface from which the axon emerges, and the sepa- tional features of an intact hippocampal circuit. The rate dendritic trees are referred to as apical and basi- ex vivo electrophysiological study of hippocampal lar dendrites, with each cell having one or two apical slices has been instrumental in deciphering the cellular dendrites and several basilar dendrites. All hippocam- and molecular correlates of hippocampal-dependent pal pyramidal cells are aligned in the same orienta- learning (Figure 5bAuthor's). Personaltion, with the apical dendritic Copy trees radiating toward

the center of the C-shaped semicircle of cells (filling Principal Neurons the stratum radiatum). The basilar dendrites extend in the opposite direction (filling the stratum oriens).

All the principal cells of the hippocampal formation Hippocampal pyramidal cell axons penetrate the stra- (pyramidal and granule cells) are believed to be glu- tum oriens and travel as part of the alveus to distal tamatergic. Pyramidal cells have a distinctly pyramid hippocampal or subcortical targets. or tear-drop shape. Pyramidal cells in CA3 and CA2 Granule cells of the dentate gyrus have small have larger cell bodies (approximately 25 mmin spherical or ovoid-shaped cell bodies (approximately diameter) than those in CA1 (approximately 15 mm 8–15 mm in diameter). One moderately complex in diameter) (Figure 6). Separate multibranching dendritic tree (filling the stratum moleculare) is dendritic trees emerge from the apex and base of attached to the pole of the cell opposite from where

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

316 Hippocampal Neurons

Hippocampus

Pyramidal cell Subiculum Schaffer collateral (CA3 Cell Axon)

CA1

Fimbria of fornix CA3 3

2 1

Entorhinal cortex

Perforant path

Mossy fiber (Granule cell (a) axon) Granule cell

Dentate gyrus Field EPSP Stimulating Pulse Recording electrode electrode

Schaffer collateral pathway (associative LTP) CA1

CA3

Dentate region Mossy fiber pathway Perforant fiber pathway (b) (nonassociative LTP) (associative LTP)

Figure 5 Hippocampal-formation trisynaptic neural circuit. a, An intact unidirectional trisynaptic neural circuit in a 250- to 500-mm ex vivo transverse section of rat hippocampal formation (lamellae); b, stimulation of a transverse slice of hippocampal formation placed in a chamber containing a solution of artificial cerebrospinal fluid to assess the electrophysiological activity in one component of the trisynaptic circuit. In (a) representative pyramidal cells (present in the entorhinal cortex, CA3, CA1, and subiculum) and a granule cell (in the dentate gyrus) that participate in the circuit are depicted. The three featured synapses of the circuit are numbered in the temporal order in which they are engaged by neural activity, starting with pyramidal neurons in the entorhinal cortex. In (b) a stimulating and recording electrode is applied to the tissue slice in order to assess electrophysiological activity within one component of the trisynaptic circuit. EPSP, excitatory postsynaptic potential; LTP, long-term potentiation. Adapted from Squire, L. R. and Kandel, E. R. (2000), Memory, from mind to molecules, New York: Scientific American Library. Author's Personal Copy

the axon emerges and projects. There is also a popu- (Figure 6). The head of these spines form the postsyn- lation of large-diameter cells in the hilus region of the aptic site for much of the excitatory input to these dentate gyrus called mossy cells that also appear to be cells. There are especially large prominent spines on glutamatergic. These cells receive input from the CA3 neurons and mossy cells called thorny excre- mossy fibers and project back to the dentate gyrus sences, which form the postsynaptic site for the granule cells. Interestingly, mossy cells preferentially mossy fiber input from the dentate gyrus. Inhibitory project bilaterally to granule cells at other levels of synapses, largely arising from g-aminobutyric acid the longitudinal axis than that in which they reside. (GABA)ergic interneurons, are mostly localized to The dendritic trees of hippocampal formation prin- the soma, dendritic shafts, and axonal initial segments cipal cells are densely covered with bulbous spines of the principal cells.

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

Hippocampal Neurons 317

interneurons are interconnected in such a way as to

mediate complex feedforward and feedback inhibition and disinhibition within the hippocampal formation.

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Neural Connections

A major source of neural input to the dentate gyrus,

as previously described, is from the entorhinal cortex and constitutes the first component of the trisynaptic circuit. There are considerable reciprocal connections of the entorhinal cortex with other regions of neocor-

tex, most notably the adjacent perirhinal cortex and Figure 6 Hippocampal formation principal cells. Camera lucida the nearby postrhinal and piriform cortex. There are tracings of representative CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells in the also substantial direct interconnections with the hippocampus and a granule cell in the dentate gyrus (DG) from medial prefrontal, insular, and retrosplenial cortex. rat brain are shown. All three representative cells are oriented Thus, the entorhinal cortex is believed to provide such that the axon emerges from the bottom of the cell body (an the dentate gyrus and hippocampus with the rich axon is clearly evident for the granule neuron). Multibranched apical (a) and basilar (b) dendritic trees are attached to the pyra- multimodal sensory content of ongoing experience. midal cell body. The dendritic trees for the granule cell are at- In addition to the extensive input to the dentate gyrus, tached to the upper portion of the cell body. A camera lucida the entorhinal cortex also provides (via the temporal- tracing of an enlarged portion of a CA1 apical dendrite is also ammonic pathway) direct monosynaptic parallel included. This tracing illustrates the dense presence of spines that input to the CA3 region of the hippocampus, as well cover the dendrites of these principal cells. Adapted from Gould, E., Woolley, C.S., Frankfurt, M., et al. (1990), Gondadal steroids as direct input to CA1 pyramidal cells. Thus, both regulate dendritic spine density in hippocampal pyramidal cells CA3 and CA1 neurons are in the position to integrate Journal of Neuroscience ã in adulthood. 10,1286–1291. 1990 by or compare direct and processed information from the Society for Neuroscience. the entorhinal cortex. The projection of CA1 neurons back to the entorhinal cortex, either directly or via the

subiculum, makes the entorhinal cortex the principal Interneurons bidirectional interface between the hippocampal for- mation and various neocortical regions. There are various types of interneuron cell bodies In addition to the trisynaptic circuit, there are scattered throughout all strata of the dentate gyrus extensive commissural and longitudinal associational and hippocampus. Most of these interneurons are connections within the hippocampus. The major presumed to be GABAergic, and they have been source of these additional associational connections further categorized by the differential expression of are provided by the non-Schaffer collateral branch of various neuropeptides and calcium-binding proteins. CA3 pyramidal cell axons, with additional contribu- Many of these interneurons have extensive axon tion from CA2 pyramidal cells and mossy cells of collaterals and arborization that extend fairly long the hilus. distances within both the longitudinal and transverse There are other important neural inputs to the plane and form numerous synaptic contacts with prin- dentate gyrus and hippocampus from various popula- cipal cells. Although there are substantially fewer hip- tions of biogenic amine-containing neurons that may pocampal interneurons than principal cells (probably primarily modulate the general excitatory tone and totaling less than 1% of all hippocampal neurons), this neural synchronization within this structure. In addi- pattern of connectivityAuthor's allows them to have substantial Personaltion, the CA1 region receives Copy direct excitatory input effects on overall hippocampal function. Two of the from basal nuclei of the and midline nuclei better-characterized types of inhibitory interneurons of the . Interestingly, the amygdala input to are the basket cells and the chandelier or axoaxonic the hippocampus is largely restricted to the ventral cells. The basket cells are so named because their hippocampus. multibranched axons form an extensive interwoven The major output neurons of the hippocampal for- contact with the cell body of target pyramidal cells. mation are pyramidal cells in CA1, subiculum, and The chandelier cells form strong synaptic contacts deep layers of the entorhinal cortex. CA1 and sub- on the initial axonal segment of pyramidal cells. It iculum pyramidal cells provide a large subcortical should also be noted that there are many synaptic projection via the fornix to the septum and hypothal- contacts between inhibitory interneurons as well as amus, with minor contribution from CA3 pyramidal axodendritic contacts from principal cells. Thus, the cells. There are also strong direct connections of the

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

318 Hippocampal Neurons

CA1 and subiculum with the medial prefrontal cor- in the hippocampus. Nicotinic ACh receptors are tex. However, as previously indicated, there are more ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast excitatory þ þ extensive indirect connections of the CA1 and sub- transmission via an influx of Na and Ca2 . Nico- iculum with the prefrontal and other cortical areas tinic receptors are expressed on both excitatory and via the entorhinal cortex. inhibitory interneurons in the hippocampus and can be expressed pre- and postsynaptically. Muscarinic receptors are very densely expressed in the hippo- Neurochemistry campus, and different subtypes are differentially Amino Acid Neurotransmitters expressed on specific populations of neurons: M1/M3 on principal cells and M2/M4 on interneurons. The The excitatory neurotransmitter, glutamate, is re- actions of muscarinic receptor activation can be leased from hippocampal-formation principal cells excitatory or inhibitory, depending on the type of and is therefore the neurotransmitter used by the G-protein to which the receptor is coupled: M1/M3 perforant path, mossy fibers, and Schaffer collaterals. are coupled to Gq (which stimulates phospholipase C),

Glutamate receptor subtypes include the ionotropic and M2/M4 are coupled to Gi/o (which can inhibit þ receptors (iGluRs), which directly gate cation chan- adenylyl cyclase or activate a K channel). Musca- nels and are named after the ligands that preferential- rinic receptor activation potentiates NMDA receptor ly bind to them: N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), activity, probably by the activation of the M1 sub- a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methy l-4-isoxazolepropionic type. M2 can be expressed as autoreceptors on cho- acid (AMPA), and kainate. All the iGluRs are present linergic terminals. Acetylcholine is also known to in the excitatory pathways of the hippocampus. regulate the release of dopamine, serotonin, and

AMPA and kainate receptors mediate fast excitatory neuropeptides by the activation of presynaptic nico- postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), and NMDA recep- þ tinic and muscarinic receptors. tors mediate slower EPSPs. All the iGluRs open Na Cholinergic neurons that project to the hippocampus þ and K channels. NMDA as well as some AMPA and from the and the nucleus of the 2þ kainate receptors are also permeable to Ca . The diagonal band of Broca contribute to the synchronous NMDA receptor is unique in that channel permeabil- discharge of principal cells reflected by the prominent ity is both ligand- and voltage-dependent. theta frequency hippocampal electroencephalograph There is also a family of metabotropic glutamate (EEG). Theta is observed both during voluntary move- receptors (mGluRs) that are coupled to guanine ment (Type 1, 8–12 Hz) and during alert immobility nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins). mGluRs (Type 2, 4–6 Hz), although only Type 2 theta is sensi- have both pre- and postsynaptic localization and tive to cholinergic manipulations. can coexist in the postsynaptic density with iGluRs. Dopamine afferent terminals are observed in the Postsynaptically, mGluR regulate synaptic transmis- ventral subiculum, in all strata of CA1, in the stratum sion by stimulating specific second-messenger cas- oriens of CA3, and in the hilus of the dentate gyrus. cades and generating slow synaptic responses. When The source of hippocampal dopamine comes from the expressed presynaptically, mGluR activation can midbrain ventral tegmentum and substantia nigra modulate transmitter release. and there is some evidence for different populations The inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA can also act of dopaminergic cells innervating dorsal and ventral on both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. hippocampal formations. Dopamine receptors com-

GABAA receptors are ionotropic and gate ion chan- prise two types, D1-like (D1 and D5) and D2-like nels that are permeable to the anion Cl . GABA also (D2, D3, and D4), and all are metabotropic. D5 is binds a metabotropic receptor, GABAB, which is cou- þ the most prominent D1-like receptor in the hippocam- pled to a G-protein that, when activated, opens K Author's Personalpus and is coupled to GCopys (which stimulates adenylyl channels. When expressed postsynaptically, GABA B cyclase). D5 receptors are expressed on pyramidal cells receptor activation leads to a slow hyperpolarization. and can enhance NMDA- and AMPA-mediated cur- When expressed presynaptically, GABAB receptor rents. Dopamine D4 is the most prominent D2-like activation reduces neurotransmitter release. receptor in the hippocampus. D4 receptors are densely expressed on pyramidal neurons in CA1, on granule Biogenic Amines cells in the dentate gyrus, and on GABA interneur- The major cholinergic input to the hippocampus is ons. D4 receptors are coupled to G and decrease i/o from the medial septal nucleus. Acetylcholine (ACh), NMDA-mediated excitatory transmission. similar to glutamate and GABA, can act on both Norepinephrine innervation of the hippocampus ionotropic (nicotinic receptors) and metabotropic arises primarily from the locus ceruleus, and the (muscarinic) receptors, both of which are expressed hippocampus contains one of the highest densities

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

Hippocampal Neurons 319 of norepinephrine-containing terminals in the brain. gonadal and adrenal steroid hormones and thyroid

Receptors for norepinephrine (adrenergic receptors) hormone are also expressed in the hippocampus. have been divided into two classes: a and b, which are Growth factors that are abundant in the hippocam- further subdivided based on the specific G-proteins to pus include brain-derived growth factor (BDGF), which they are coupled. b-adrenergic receptors are nerve growth factor (NGF) and fibroblast growth coupled to Gs, while a1 types are coupled to Gq and factor (FGF). Growth factors perform neurotrophic a2 types to Gi. Electrical stimulation of the locus and neuroprotective functions and are critically ceruleus produces an inhibition of hippocampal pyra- involved in development and neuroplasticity. Cyto- midal neuron firing, followed by a transient increase kines regulate intercellular communication, including in firing. The inhibition appears to be mediated by glial-to-neuronal and immune-to-neuronal communi- a and the excitation by b receptors. cation. Cytokine ligands and their receptors found in 2 Serotonin (5HT) input to the hippocampus derives the hippocampus include interleukin-1, tumor necrosis almost exclusively from the median raphe nucleus. factor, and fractalkine. Eicosanoids are metabolites Serotonin receptors in the hippocampus are pre- of arachidonic acid, which is derived from dietary ferentially expressed on calbindin-positive GABA linoleic acid. Several of the eicosanoids, including interneurons, and the specific subtypes expressed anandamide (arachidonylethanolamine) and arachi- include 5HT1A, which is coupled to Gi/o; 5HT2A, donoylglycerol, are known as endocannabinoids be- whichis coupled to Gq; and 5HT3. The 5HT3 re- cause they act on the cannabinoid receptor CB1. High ceptor is an ionotropic receptor, the activation of levels of CB1 expression are found throughout the which opens a nonspecific cation channel, resulting hippocampus. in fast depolarization. The activation of 5HT recep- 3 tors can thus inhibit the firing of pyramidal neurons Neuroplasticity by a GABA interneuron-mediated mechanism. There Long-term potentiation (LTP) reflects a cellular model are also autoreceptors of the 5HT1B/D subtype on of learning and memory, first described in rabbit hip- serotonergic terminals that inhibit the release of sero- pocampus in 1973. LTP is induced by applying a brief tonin. Intracellular recording studies show that the high-frequency electrical stimulus to an excitatory most prominent effect of serotonin application to synaptic pathway, such as the hippocampal Schaffer the hippocampus is hyperpolarization of pyramidal þ collateral pathway, the perforant pathway, or the neurons caused by an increase in K conductance. mossy fiber pathway (Figure 5b). For periods of Histamine projections arise from the tuberomam- hours (in vitro)toweeks(in vivo) after this condition- millary nucleus of the hypothalamus. Histamine H 2 ing stimulus, a test stimulus can subsequently provoke receptors are dense in CA1 and CA3 and are primari- an increased synaptic response that is 50–200% above ly located on pyramidal cell dendrites, but are also baseline. In the Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapse and found on granule cells in the dentate gyrus. H2 the perforant path–dentate gyrus synapse, LTP is receptors are coupled positively to adenylyl cyclase, dependent on the activation of the NMDA receptor and the activation of these receptors causes strong þ and subsequent Ca2 influx (associative LTP), whereas excitation. Histamine H receptors are mostly found 1 in the mossy fiber–CA3 synapse, LTP appears to be in CA3, where their activation causes hyperpolariza- dependent on kainate receptors (nonassociative LTP). tion. The H receptor is coupled to stimulation of 1 LTP has four basic characteristics that resemble phospholipase C via G .H receptors are also in- q/11 3 features of learning and memory: hibitory (coupled to G ) and are located on perfor- i/o ant path terminals in the dentate gyrus, where their 1. Temporal specificity: the presynaptic cell must fire activation can suppress glutamate secretion. before the postsynaptic cell. Author's Personal2. Cooperativity: many Copy synapses must be active to

Other Neuromodulators induce LTP. 3. Associativity: a strong input can induce potentia- The hippocampus is rich in other neuromodulators, tion at a weakly activated, adjacent synapse on the including neuropeptides, growth factors, cytokines, same postsynaptic cell. and endocannabinoids as well as their receptors. 4. Input specificity: potentiation is only induced Neuropeptides are typically coreleased with classical at the synapses that received the conditioning neurotransmitters. Neuropeptides expressed in hippo- stimulation. campal neurons include cholecystokinin, somato- statin, neuropeptide Y, leptin, galanin, corticotropin In contrast to the potentiation caused by brief high- releasing hormone, and the opioid peptides b-endor- frequency stimulation, prolonged low-frequency stim- phin, enkephalin, and dynorphin. Receptors for the ulation of a pathway induces a long-term depression

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320

320 Hippocampal Neurons

(LTD) of the synaptic response to a test stimulus. Like Further Reading the typical LTP found in most pathways (but not Amaral, D. G. and Witter, M. P. (1989). The three-dimen- the mossy fiber pathway), LTD is also dependent on sional organization of the hippocampal formation: the activation of the NMDA receptor. It is thought that 2þ a review of anatomical data. Neuroscience 31, 571–591. different patterns of Ca influx produced during LTP Andersen, P. (1975). Organization of hippocampal neurons and LTD induction determine the differential and their interconnections. In: Isaacson, R. L. & Pribram, responses to these stimuli; high-frequency stimulation K. H. (eds.) The hippocampus Vol. 1: Structure and 2þ results in a large Ca elevation and activation of the development. New York: Plenum Press. 2þ Ca /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK) Andersen, P., Bliss, T. V. P. and Skrede, K. (1971). Lamellar cascade, whereas the smaller but more prolonged organization of hippocampal excitatory pathways. þ Ca2 elevation produced by low-frequency stimulation Experimental Brain Research 13, 222–238. Bland, B. H. and Oddie, S. D. (2001). Theta band leads to activation of a phosphatase cascade. oscillation and synchrony in the hippocampal formation and associated structures: the case for its role in sensori- Hippocampal Function motor integration. Behavioral Brain Research 127,

The hippocampal formation appears to play a uni- 119–136. Bliss, T. V. and Lomo, T. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation quely pivotal role in the brain’s ability to form rapid of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaes- and long-lasting associations between environmental thetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant stimuli in a way that allows for the learning of new path. Journal of Physiology (London) 232, 331–356. concrete and abstract factual information (declarative Eichenbaum, H. and Otto, T. (1992). The hippocampus – memory) and detailed recall and recognition of events what does it do? Behavioral and Neural Biology 57,

2–36. and places (episodic memory). The hippocampus in rodents appears to have an especially important role Freund, T. F. and Buzsaki, G. (1996). Interneurons of the in learning the spatial configuration of places. Many hippocampus. Hippocampus 6, 347–470. CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells behave as place cells; Joels, M. (2001). Corticosteroid actions in the hippo- on initial exposure to a new environment, these cells campus. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 13, 657–669. Gould, E., Woolley, C. S., Frankfurt, M., et al. (1990). acquire within several minutes the ability to increase Gondadal steroids regulate dendritic spine density in their neuronal firing rate whenever the rat returns to hippocampal pyramidal cells in adulthood. Journal of a particular place in that environment. Neuroscience 10, 1286–1291. The role of the hippocampus in stress response is Johnston, D. and Amaral, D. G. (2004). Hippocampus. In: less clear. As part of the limbic system, the involve- Shepherd, G. M. (ed.) The synaptic organization of the ment of the hippocampus in the generation of a stress brain (5th edn., pp. 455–498). Oxford: Oxford Uni- state has often been presumed, but its anatomical versity Press. neighbor, the amygdala, appears to play a much Malenka, R. C. and Bear, M. F. (2004). LTP and LTD: an more important role than the hippocampus in this embarrassment of riches. Neuron 44, 5–21. O’Keefe, J. and Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a process. The cells of the hippocampus, however, ap- pear to be especially sensitive to the effects of various cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press. stressors, perhaps in part due to their high expression O’Reilly, R. C. and Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive repre- sentations in learning and memory: principles of cortical of adrenal steroid receptors. Although the hippocam- and hippocampal function. Psychological Review 108, pus may not be directly involved in the generation 311–345. of a stress state, in the rat its more ventral regions Ramon y Cajal, S. (1968). The structure of Ammon’s horn. ´ contribute regulatory influences on hypothalamic- Original publication in Spanish, 1893. Kraft, L. M. pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. Whether the (trans.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. primate hippocampusAuthor's also has direct modulatory PersonalRisold, P. Y. and Swanson, Copy L. W. (1996). Structural evidence effects on the HPA axis remains to be determined. for functional domains in the rat hippocampus. Science 272, 1484–1486.

See Also the Following Articles Squire, L. R. and Kandel, E. R. (2000). Memory, from mind to molecules. New York: Scientific American Library. Glucocorticoids – Adverse Effects on the Nervous Swanson, L. W. (2004). Brain maps: structure of the rat System; Hippocampus, Corticosteroid Effects on; Hippo- brain (3rd edn.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. campus, Overview; Learning and Memory, Effects of Witter, M. P. and Amaral, D. G. (2004). Hippocampal

Stress on; Memory and Stress; Neurogenesis; Steroid formation. In: Paxinos, G. (ed.) The rat nervous system Hormone Receptors; Glucocorticoid Effects on Memory: (3rd edn., pp. 635–704). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic the Positive and Negative. Press.

Encyclopedia of Stress, Second Edition (2007), vol. 2, pp. 311-320