DOCSLIB.ORG

LEARNING in SILICON: a NEUROMORPHIC MODEL of the HIPPOCAMPUS John Vernon Arthur a DISSERTATION in Bioengineering Presented to Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LEARNING in SILICON: a NEUROMORPHIC MODEL of the HIPPOCAMPUS John Vernon Arthur a DISSERTATION in Bioengineering Presented to Th LEARNING IN SILICON: A NEUROMORPHIC MODEL OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS John Vernon Arthur A DISSERTATION in Bioengineering Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2006 Kwabena Boahen, Christopher S. Chen, Supervisor of Dissertation Graduate Group Chair COPYRIGHT John Vernon Arthur 2006 Acknowledgements Many people contributed in many ways to my time at Penn. I thank them all. Specifically, I thank my advisor, Kwabena Boahen. He has guided me through many challenges and has provided a constant example of what a researcher should be and can accomplish. Our interactions taught me a great deal and shaped my vision of research, science, and engineering for the better. I thank my committee - Matt Dalva, Leif Finkel, and John Hopfield - who provided advice as well as new insights and different viewpoints that challenged my assumptions, improving my work. I thank those that I had the opportunity to work with - Kareem Zaghloul, Kai Hynna, Brian Taba, Paul Merolla, Bo Wen, John Wittig, Thomas Choi, Rodrigo Alvarez, and Joe Lin - for the time we spent at work and at play. I thank them and many others for their friendship. I thank my family, my parents for exemplifying integrity and work ethic, and my sib- lings for their encouragement. Finally, I thank my wife, Amy, for immeasurable contributions— her enduring support, her constant willingness to help, and her extraordinary tolerance. iii Abstract LEARNING IN SILICON: A NEUROMORPHIC MODEL OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS John Vernon Arthur Supervisor: Kwabena Boahen The human brain is the most complex computing structure in the known universe; it excels at many tasks that digital computers perform poorly, such as learning input patterns and later retreiving them with only a part of the original patterns as input, realizing associa- tive memory. Our brains perform these feats rapidly and with unmatched energy efficiency, using only about 10W, far less than a typical light bulb. To explore neurobiological process- ing, neuromorphic engineers use existing silicon technology to duplicate neural structure and function down to the level of ion channels, efficiently morphing brain-like computation into mixed analog and digital integrated circuits. In this dissertation, we present a neuromorphic model of the hippocampus, a brain region critical in associative memory. We model hippocampal rhythmicity for the first time in a neuromorphic model by developing a new class of silicon neurons that synchronize by using shunting inhibition (conductance-based) with a synaptic rise-time. Synaptic rise-time promotes synchrony by delaying the effect of inhibition, providing an opportune period for neurons to spike together. Shunting inhibition, through its voltage dependence, inhibits neurons that spike out of phase more strongly (delaying the spike further), pushing them into phase (in the next cycle). In addition, we use these neurons to implement associative memory in a recurrent net- work that uses binary-weighted synpases with spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) to iv learn stimulated patterns of neuron activity and to compensate for variability in excitability. STDP preferentially potentiates (turns on) synapses that project from excitable neurons, which fire early, to lethargic neurons, which fire late. The additional excitatory synaptic current makes lethargic neurons fire earlier, thereby causing neurons that belong to the same pattern to fire in synchrony. Potentiation among neurons in the same pattern store it such that, once learned, an entire pattern can be recalled by stimulating a subset, which recruits the inactive members of the original pattern. v Contents Acknowledgements iii Abstract iv Contents vi List of Figures xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Dissertation Structure . 2 1.2 Original Contributions . 4 2 A Model of the Episodic Hippocampus 6 2.1EpisodicMemory............................... 7 vi 2.2 The Episodic Hippocampus . 8 2.3 Hippocampal Biology . 12 2.3.1 Hippocampal Neurons . 14 2.3.1.1 Granule Neurons . 16 2.3.1.2 Mossy Neurons . 16 2.3.1.3 CA3 Pyramidal Neurons . 17 2.3.1.4 CA1 Pyramidal Neurons . 17 2.3.1.5 Inhibitory Interneurons . 18 2.3.2 Connections . 18 2.3.2.1 Trisynaptic Circuit . 18 2.3.2.2 Dentate Gyrus Excitatory Connectivity . 19 2.3.2.3 CA3 Excitatory Connectivity . 20 2.3.2.4 CA1 Excitatory Connectivity . 21 2.3.2.5 Inhibitory Interneuron Connectivity . 22 2.3.3 Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity . 22 2.3.3.1 Hebb’s Rule . 22 vii 2.3.3.2 Long-Term Potentiation and Depression . 23 2.3.3.3 Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity . 26 2.3.4 Rhythmicity . 27 2.3.4.1 Theta Rhythm . 28 2.3.4.2 Gamma Rhythm . 29 2.4 Components of Sequence Memory . 30 2.4.1 Autoassociation . 30 2.4.2 Heteroassociation . 32 2.4.3 Abstract Sequence Memory . 34 2.5 Models of the Hippocampus . 34 2.5.1 Models of Hippocampal Autoassociation . 35 2.5.2 Models of Hippocampal Sequence Memory . 36 2.6 Dual Autoassociation Model of Sequence Memory . 41 2.6.1 Autoassociative and Heteroassociative Memory Regions . 42 2.6.2 Sequence Memory Storage . 43 2.6.3 Sequence Memory Recall . 46 viii 2.6.4 The Role of the CA1 . 46 2.7 Neuromorphic CA3 . 47 3 A Neuromorphic Neuron 48 3.1 Neuromorphic Design Methodology: In the Valley of Death . 49 3.2 Conductance-Based Neuron Design . 52 3.3NeuronCircuit................................ 58 3.3.1 Low-pass Filter . 58 3.3.2 Pulse Extender . 64 3.3.3 SomaCircuit............................. 67 3.3.4 Synapse Circuit . 70 3.4 Characterization . 73 3.4.1 Frequency-Current Curve . 74 3.4.2 Synaptic Rise and Decay . 81 3.4.3 Synaptic Summation . 81 3.4.4 Phase-Response . 86 3.5Discussion................................... 87 ix 4 Silicon Gamma Synchrony 89 4.1 Gamma Synchrony in the Hippocampal Formation . 90 4.2PreviousModels............................... 91 4.2.1 Silicon Models . 92 4.2.2 Analytical Models . 92 4.2.3 Computational models . 93 4.3 Including Synaptic Rise-Time . 96 4.4 Interneuron Circuit . 100 4.4.1 Phase-Response Curve . 100 4.5 Interneuron Network . 102 4.5.1 Experimental Setup . 103 4.5.2 Quantifying Synchrony . 103 4.5.3 Computing Network Frequency and Period . 106 4.6Results.....................................107 4.6.1 Gabaergic Rise-time . 109 4.6.2 Other Gabaergic Parameters . 112 x 4.6.3 Input Current . 115 4.6.4 Poisson Input . 116 4.6.5 Pyramidal Neuron Entrainment . 117 4.7Discussion...................................119 5 Silicon Synaptic Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity 124 5.1 STDP in the Hippocampus . 125 5.2 Plastic Silicon Synapses . 126 5.2.1 Membrane Voltage-Dependent Plasticity . 127 5.2.2 Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity . 128 5.3 The Silicon STDP Circuit . 129 5.3.1 Specifications . 130 5.3.2 Circuit Design . 131 5.3.3 Analysis...............................134 5.4 Characterization . 136 5.4.1 Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity Results . 137 5.4.2 Curve Parameters . 137 xi 5.4.3 Variability...............................139 5.4.4 Transition Verification . 142 5.4.5 Poisson Stimulus . 143 5.5Discussion...................................146 6 Timing in Silicon Autoassociation 150 6.1 Hippocampal Associative Memory . 151 6.2 Previous Silicon Autoassociation . 153 6.3 Neuromorphic CA3 . 159 6.3.1 Pyramidal Neuron . 160 6.3.2 Pyramidal Network . 161 6.4 Neuromorphic Autoassociation . 163 6.4.1 Variability Compensation . 163 6.4.2 Pattern Storage and Recall . 167 6.5 Sources of Spike-Timing Variation . 169 6.5.1 Components of Variation . 172 6.5.2 Timing Variation . 174 xii 6.6Discussion...................................176 7 Conclusions 179 7.1 Appropriate Level of Abstraction . 180 7.1.1 Silicon Gamma Synchrony . 180 7.1.2 Silicon Synaptic Plasticity . 181 7.2 Mismatch Matters . 182 7.2.1 Bane of Mismatch . 182 7.2.2 Boon of Mismatch . 183 7.3FutureWork..................................183 7.3.1 Sequence Memory . 184 7.3.2 Neural Scale . 185 7.3.3 Silicon Dendrites . 186 7.4 Insights into Neurobiology . 186 7.5Conclusion..................................187 A Phase Response 189 A.1 Instantaneous Inhibition . 189 xiii A.1.1 Integrator-Type Neuron . 189 A.1.2 Conductance-Type Neuron . 191 A.2 Instantaneous Excitation . 193 A.2.1 Integrator-Type Neuron . 194 A.2.2 Conductance-Type Neuron . 195 B Low-Pass Filter 198 C SRAM Scanner 203 C.1Architecture..................................203 C.2Segments...................................205 Bibliography 208 xiv List of Figures 2.1 The Human Hippocampus . 9 2.2PlaceCells.................................. 10 2.3 The Episodic Hippocampus . 12 2.4 Memory Space Not Space Memory . 13 2.5 Hippocampal Sequence Activity . 14 2.6 Neurons of the.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transsynaptic Modulation of Presynaptic Short-Term Plasticity Induction in Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.353953; this version posted October 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Transsynaptic modulation of presynaptic short-term plasticity induction in hippocampal mossy fiber synapses David Vandael1,2, Yuji Okamoto1, and Peter Jonas2 Cellular Neuroscience, IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria 1 These authors contributed equally. 2 Corresponding authors. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Corresponding author: Dr. David Vandael Dr. Peter Jonas IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria) Cellular Neuroscience, Am Campus 1 A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria Phone: 0043-2243-9000-3700 Fax: 0043-2243-9000-2007 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.353953; this version posted October 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. SUMMARY The hippocampal mossy fiber synapse is a key synapse of the trisynaptic circuit of the hippocampus. Post-tetanic potentiation (PTP) is the most powerful form of plasticity at this synaptic connection. It is widely believed that mossy fiber PTP is an entirely presynaptic phenomenon, implying that PTP induction is input-specific, and requires neither activity of multiple inputs nor stimulation of postsynaptic neurons for induction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Amnesias
    The Three Amnesias Russell M. Bauer, Ph.D. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology College of Public Health and Health Professions Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida PO Box 100165 HSC Gainesville, FL 32610-0165 USA Bauer, R.M. (in press). The Three Amnesias. In J. Morgan and J.E. Ricker (Eds.), Textbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press. The Three Amnesias - 2 During the past five decades, our understanding of memory and its disorders has increased dramatically. In 1950, very little was known about the localization of brain lesions causing amnesia. Despite a few clues in earlier literature, it came as a complete surprise in the early 1950’s that bilateral medial temporal resection caused amnesia. The importance of the thalamus in memory was hardly suspected until the 1970’s and the basal forebrain was an area virtually unknown to clinicians before the 1980’s. An animal model of the amnesic syndrome was not developed until the 1970’s. The famous case of Henry M. (H.M.), published by Scoville and Milner (1957), marked the beginning of what has been called the “golden age of memory”. Since that time, experimental analyses of amnesic patients, coupled with meticulous clinical description, pathological analysis, and, more recently, structural and functional imaging, has led to a clearer understanding of the nature and characteristics of the human amnesic syndrome. The amnesic syndrome does not affect all kinds of memory, and, conversely, memory disordered patients without full-blown amnesia (e.g., patients with frontal lesions) may have impairment in those cognitive processes that normally support remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • Glutamate Regulation in the Hippocampal Trisynaptic Pathway in Aging and Status Epilepticus
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 GLUTAMATE REGULATION IN THE HIPPOCAMPAL TRISYNAPTIC PATHWAY IN AGING AND STATUS EPILEPTICUS Michelle Lee Stephens University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stephens, Michelle Lee, "GLUTAMATE REGULATION IN THE HIPPOCAMPAL TRISYNAPTIC PATHWAY IN AGING AND STATUS EPILEPTICUS" (2009). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 736. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/736 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Michelle Lee Stephens The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2009 GLUTAMATE REGULATION IN THE HIPPOCAMPAL TRISYNAPTIC PATHWAY IN AGING AND STATUS EPILEPTICUS ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Medicine at the University of Kentucky By Michelle Lee Stephens Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Greg A. Gerhardt, Professor of Anatomy and Neurobiology Lexington, Kentucky 2009 Copyright © Michelle Lee Stephens 2009 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION GLUTAMATE REGULATION IN THE HIPPOCAMPAL TRISYNAPTIC PATHWAY IN AGING AND STATUS EPILEPTICUS A positive correlation exists between increasing age and the incidence of hippocampal-associated dysfunction and disease. Normal L-glutamate neurotransmission is absolutely critical for hippocampal function, while abnormal glutamate neurotransmission has been implicated in many neurodegenerative diseases. Previous studies, overwhelmingly utilizing ex vivo methods, have filled the literature with contradicting reports about hippocampal glutamate regulation during aging.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neural Mechanism for Capnotaxis in the Naked Mole-Rat
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2020 A Neural Mechanism for Capnotaxis in the Naked Mole-Rat Michael Zions The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3555 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] A NEURAL MECHANISM FOR CAPNOTAXIS IN THE NAKED MOLE-RAT By MICHAEL ZIONS A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2020 © 2020 MICHAEL ZIONS All Rights Reserved ii A NEURAL MECHANISM FOR CAPNOTAXIS IN THE NAKED MOLE-RAT By Michael Zions This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Biology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Dan P. McCloskey, Ph.D. (College of Staten Island) Chair of Examining Committee Date Christine Li, Ph.D. Acting Executive Officer Graduate Center/CUNY Program in Biology Supervisory Committee Dr. Abdeslem El Idrissi, College of Staten Island, City University of New York Dr. Jeffrey Goodman, Dept. of Developmental Biology, Institute for Basic Research Dr. Jonathan Levitt, City College, City University of New York Dr. Kai Kaila, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT A Neural Mechanism for Capnotaxis in the Naked Mole-Rat by Michael Zions Advisor: Dan P.
    [Show full text]
  • Somatostatin-Positive Interneurons in the Dentate Gyrus of Mice Provide
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Somatostatin-positive interneurons in the dentate gyrus of mice provide local- and long-range septal synaptic inhibition Mei Yuan1,2†, Thomas Meyer1†, Christoph Benkowitz1, Shakuntala Savanthrapadian1, Laura Ansel-Bollepalli3, Angelica Foggetti3, Peer Wulff3, Pepe Alcami1, Claudio Elgueta1, Marlene Bartos1* 1Systemic and Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Physiology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Faculty for Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 3Institute for Physiology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany Abstract Somatostatin-expressing-interneurons (SOMIs) in the dentate gyrus (DG) control formation of granule cell (GC) assemblies during memory acquisition. Hilar-perforant-path- associated interneurons (HIPP cells) have been considered to be synonymous for DG-SOMIs. Deviating from this assumption, we show two functionally contrasting DG-SOMI-types. The classical feedback-inhibitory HIPPs distribute axon fibers in the molecular layer. They are engaged by converging GC-inputs and provide dendritic inhibition to the DG circuitry. In contrast, SOMIs with axon in the hilus, termed hilar interneurons (HILs), provide perisomatic inhibition onto GABAergic cells in the DG and project to the medial septum. Repetitive activation of glutamatergic inputs onto HIPP cells induces long-lasting-depression (LTD) of synaptic transmission but long-term- potentiation (LTP) of synaptic signals in HIL cells. Thus, LTD in HIPPs may assist flow of spatial information from the entorhinal cortex to the DG, whereas LTP in HILs may facilitate the temporal coordination of GCs with activity patterns governed by the medial septum. *For correspondence: marlene. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.21105.001 [email protected]. de †These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction Competing interest: See The DG is situated between the entorhinal cortex and the CA3 area of the hippocampus, forming page 20 the first stage of the classical trisynaptic circuit (Andersen et al., 1971; Eichenbaum, 1993; Lis- man, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Hippocampus : Neurotransmission and Plasticity in the Nervous System / Philippe Taupin
    THE HIPPOCAMPUS - NEUROTRANSMISSION AND PLASTICITY IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM THE HIPPOCAMPUS - NEUROTRANSMISSION AND PLASTICITY IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM PHILIPPE TAUPIN Nova Biomedical Books New York Copyright © 2007 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, electrostatic, magnetic, tape, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the Publisher. For permission to use material from this book please contact us: Telephone 631-231-7269; Fax 631-231-8175 Web Site: http://www.novapublishers.com NOTICE TO THE READER The Publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this book, but makes no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information contained in this book. The Publisher shall not be liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting, in whole or in part, from the readers’ use of, or reliance upon, this material. Independent verification should be sought for any data, advice or recommendations contained in this book. In addition, no responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from any methods, products, instructions, ideas or otherwise contained in this publication. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject matter covered herein. It is sold with the clear understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering legal or any other professional services.
    [Show full text]
  • Localization of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor to Distinct Terminals of Mossy Fiber Axons Implies Regulation of Both Excitati
    11346 • The Journal of Neuroscience, December 15, 2004 • 24(50):11346–11355 Cellular/Molecular Localization of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor to Distinct Terminals of Mossy Fiber Axons Implies Regulation of Both Excitation and Feedforward Inhibition of CA3 Pyramidal Cells Steve C. Danzer1 and James O. McNamara1,2,3 Departments of 1Neurobiology, 2Medicine (Neurology), and 3Pharmacology and Molecular Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 Hippocampal dentate granule cells directly excite and indirectly inhibit CA3 pyramidal cells via distinct presynaptic terminal specializa- tions of their mossy fiber axons. This mossy fiber pathway contains the highest concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the CNS, yet whether BDNF is positioned to regulate the excitatory and/or inhibitory pathways is unknown. To localize BDNF, confocal microscopy of green fluorescent protein transgenic mice was combined with BDNF immunohistochemistry. Approximately half of presynaptic granule cell–CA3 pyramidal cell contacts were found to contain BDNF. Moreover, enhanced neuronal activity virtually doubled the percentage of BDNF-immunoreactive terminals contacting CA3 pyramidal cells. To our surprise, BDNF was also found in mossy fiber terminals contacting inhibitory neurons. These studies demonstrate that mossy fiber BDNF is poised to regulate both direct excitatory and indirect feedforward inhibitory inputs to CA3 pyramdal cells and reveal that seizure activity increases the pool of BDNF- expressing granule cell presynaptic terminals contacting CA3 pyramidal cells. Key words: astrocyte (astroglia); epilepsy; granule cell; hippocampus; long-term potentiation; mossy fiber Introduction mossy fiber boutons, en passant terminals, and filipodial exten- Hippocampal dentate granule cells convey neocortical informa- sions (Amaral and Dent, 1981; Acsa´dy et al., 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Opposing and Complementary Topographic Connectivity Gradients Revealed by Quantitative Analysis of Canonical and Noncanonical Hippocampal CA1 Inputs
    New Research Cognition and Behavior Opposing and Complementary Topographic Connectivity Gradients Revealed by Quantitative Analysis of Canonical and Noncanonical Hippocampal CA1 Inputs Yanjun Sun,1 Douglas A. Nitz,2 Todd C. Holmes,3 and Xiangmin Xu1,4,5,6 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0322-17.2018 1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1275, 2Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, 3Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4560, 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2715, 5Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4025, and 6Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3435 Abstract Physiological studies suggest spatial representation gradients along the CA1 proximodistal axis. To determine the underlying anatomical basis, we quantitatively mapped canonical and noncanonical inputs to excitatory neurons in dorsal hippocampal CA1 along the proximal-distal axis in mice of both sexes using monosynaptic rabies tracing. Our quantitative analyses show comparable strength of subiculum complex and entorhinal cortex (EC) inputs to CA1, significant inputs from presubiculum and parasubiculum to CA1, and a threefold stronger input to proximal versus distal CA1 from CA3. Noncanonical subicular complex inputs exhibit opposing topographic connectivity gradients whereby the subiculum-CA1 input strength systematically increases but the presubiculum- CA1 input strength decreases along the proximal-distal axis. The subiculum input strength cotracks that of the lateral EC, known to be less spatially selective than the medial EC.
    [Show full text]
  • Human UCB-Mscs Treatment Upon Intraventricular Hemorrhage
    Ko et al. Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2018) 9:326 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-1052-5 RESEARCH Open Access Human UCB-MSCs treatment upon intraventricular hemorrhage contributes to attenuate hippocampal neuron loss and circuit damage through BDNF-CREB signaling Hyo Rim Ko1,2†, So Yoon Ahn3,4,5†, Yun Sil Chang3,4,5†, Inwoo Hwang1,2, Taegwan Yun1,2, Dong Kyung Sung5, Se In Sung3,4, Won Soon Park3,4,5* and Jee-Yin Ahn1,2,3,4,6* Abstract Background: Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) have been shown to prevent brain damage and improve neurocognition following intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of hUCB-MSCs are still elusive. Thus, as the hippocampus is essential for learning, memory, and cognitive functions and is intimately involved in the ventricular system, making it a potential site of IVH-induced injury, we determined the molecular basis of the effects of hUCB-derived MSCs on hippocampal neurogenesis and the recovery of hippocampal neural circuits after IVH in a rodent model. Methods: We inflicted severe IVH injury on postnatal day 4 (P4) in rats. After confirmation of successful induction of IVH using MRI (P5), intracerebroventricular administration of MSCs (ICV-MSC) was performed at 2 days post-injury (P6). For hippocampal synaptic determination, a rat entorhinal-hippocampus (EH) organotypic slice co-culture (OSC) was performed using day 3 post-IVH brains (P7) with or without ICV-MSCs. A similar strategy of experiments was applied to those rats receiving hUCB-MSC transfected with BDNF-Si-RNA for knockdown of BDNF or scrambled siRNA controls after IVH.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Imaging of Hippocampal Network Dynamics Reveals Trisynaptic Induction of CA1 LTP and "Circuit-Level" Effects of Chronic Stress and Antidepressants
    Real-Time Imaging of Hippocampal Network Dynamics Reveals Trisynaptic Induction of CA1 LTP and "Circuit-Level" Effects of Chronic Stress and Antidepressants Dissertation der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Jens Stepan München, 16. Juni 2014 ii Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Rainer Landgraf Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. George Boyan Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15. April 2015 iii iv Contents Abbreviations ........................................ viii List of Tables ........................................ xi List of Figures ........................................ xii Abstract ........................................... xiv Acknowledgments ..................................... xvii 1 Introduction ....................................... 1 1.1 The hippocampal formation . .3 1.1.1 Cytoarchitecture of the hippocampal formation . .4 1.1.2 Connection matrix of the hippocampal formation . .5 1.1.2.1 The entorhinal cortex layer II stellate cell . .5 1.1.3 The trisynaptic pathway of the hippocampus . .6 1.1.3.1 The mossy fiber to CA3 synapse . .6 1.1.3.2 Extrinsic inputs/outputs of the hippocampus . .7 1.2 Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus . .8 1.2.1 The role of NMDA receptors in LTP . .8 1.2.2 Hippocampal plasticity during theta oscillations . 10 1.3 Neurocircuitry of stress . 11 1.3.1 Activation of the HPA axis . 11 1.3.1.1 Role of the hippocampus in stress integration . 13 1.3.2 Effects of stress in the hippocampus . 14 1.4 Pharmacology of antidepressants . 16 1.4.1 Classification of antidepressants . 16 1.4.2 Theories of antidepressant drug action . 17 1.4.2.1 Role of neurotrophic factors and their receptors in the phar- macology of antidepressants . 19 2 Aims of the thesis .................................... 21 3 Material and Methods ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Neurogenesis and Aging
    Workshop on Neurogenesis and Aging National Institute on Aging March 16-17, 2020 Final May 27, 2020 This meeting summary was prepared by Bethany Stokes, Rose Li and Associates, Inc., under contract to Sigma Health Consulting and the National Institute on Aging. The views expressed in this document reflect individual opinions of the meeting participants and not necessarily those of Sigma Health Consulting or the National Institute on Aging. Review of earlier versions of this meeting summary by the following individuals is gratefully acknowledged: Maura Boldrini, Michael Bonaguidi, Dana Carluccio, Joseph Castellano, Amanda DiBattista, Ionut Dumitru, Rusty Gage, Shaoyu Ge, Rene Hen, Jenny Hsieh, Orly Lazarov, Mirjana Maletic-Savatic, Amar Sahay, Alejandro Schinder, Hongjun Song, Matt Sutterer, Kristyn Sylvia, Nancy Tuvesson, Saul Villeda, Molly Wagster, Ashley Webb, Brad Wise. Neurogenesis and Aging March 16-17, 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Meeting Summary ................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction to Mammalian Adult Neurogenesis ............................................................................3 Session I: Neurogenesis in the Adult Human Brain ..........................................................................4 Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Aging in Health and Disease ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Mapping of the Entorhinal Cortex Reveals a Hub for Synaptic Excitability in the Young
    Functional mapping of the entorhinal cortex reveals a hub for synaptic excitability in the young 3xTg mouse model for Alzheimer's disease A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FACULTY OF BIOLOGY, MEDICINE AND HEALTH 2019 Francesca Mandino SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... 7 Alternative Format Structure ............................................................................................... 8 Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 10 Declaration ............................................................................................................................ 11 Copyright statement ............................................................................................................. 11 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 12 List of main abbreviations ................................................................................................... 13 ~Chapter 1 ~ ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]