DOCSLIB.ORG

Access Arrangement Application

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Access Arrangement Application Application for Access to Undertake Opencast Coal Mining and Related Activities on Public Conservation Land 18 December 2013 1 Prepared For Te Kuha Limited Partnership Prepared By BTW South Ltd Unit 7 Cromtrade 2 McNulty Road PO Box 302 Cromwell 9342 Tel +64 3 445 9905 Fax +64 3 445 0194 18 December 2013 © BTW South Ltd 2013 The information contained in this document produced by BTW South Limited is solely for the use of the Client identified on the cover sheet for the purpose for which it has been prepared and BTW South Ltd takes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No parts of sections of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of BTW South Ltd. 2 Quality Information Document: DOC Access Agreement Application File Reference: L:\S12073 - Stevenson Mining - Te Kuha Coal Date: 15 November 2013 Revision History Authorised Revision Revision Date Details Name Signature 3 18/12/2013 Review Version 3 Document Kate Scott Client Review Authorised Revision Revision Date Details Name Signature CC; MC; AB; 2 11/2013 Review Version 2 Document JP 3 11/12/2013 Review Version 3 Document CC;MC;AB; JP 3 Contents 1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................6 1.1. Purpose of Document ............................................................................................................6 1.2. Background............................................................................................................................ 6 1.3. Project Description................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Outline of Proposal ................................................................................................................ 7 2. Description of Existing Environment .......................................................................................8 2.1. Site Location, Topography and Land Use ................................................................................ 8 2.1.1. Regional Context.................................................................................................................. 13 2.1.2. District Context .................................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Soils ..................................................................................................................................... 14 2.3. Geology................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4. Existing Hydrogeology.......................................................................................................... 16 2.4.1 Surface Water ...................................................................................................................... 16 2.4.2 Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.5. Climate ................................................................................................................................ 18 2.6. Vegetation and Wildlife........................................................................................................ 19 2.6.1 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 19 2.6.1.1 Threatened and At Risk Vascular Flora .................................................................................. 26 2.6.1.2 Bryophytes............................................................................................................................ 26 2.6.1.3 Rare Ecosystem Types........................................................................................................... 29 2.6.2 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................ 30 2.6.2.1 Birds ..................................................................................................................................... 30 2.6.1.3 Herpetofauna ....................................................................................................................... 33 2.6.1.4 Bats ...................................................................................................................................... 34 2.6.1.5 Invertebrates ........................................................................................................................ 34 2.6.1.6 Other Fauna.......................................................................................................................... 35 2.6.1.7 Fish....................................................................................................................................... 35 2.6.1.8 Habitat .................................................................................................................................36 2.7 Landscape............................................................................................................................ 37 2.8 Social Context ...................................................................................................................... 42 2.8.1 Maori Context ...................................................................................................................... 42 2.8.2 European Context................................................................................................................. 43 2.8.2.1 Gold Mining .......................................................................................................................... 43 2.8.2.2 Coal Mining........................................................................................................................... 44 4 2.8.2.3 Present Day Coal Mining ....................................................................................................... 46 3. Description of Proposed Activities ........................................................................................47 3.1 Overview of Activities ................................................................................................................. 47 3.2 Proposed Timeframes and Duration............................................................................................ 50 3.3 Access......................................................................................................................................... 50 3.4 Services ...................................................................................................................................... 54 3.5 Accommodation ......................................................................................................................... 54 3.6 Surface Structures ...................................................................................................................... 54 3.7 Water Management ................................................................................................................... 54 3.7.1. Changes to Hydrogeology as a result of Mining....................................................................... 54 3.7.2 Water Use................................................................................................................................ 55 3.7.3 Wastewater Disposal ............................................................................................................... 56 3.8 Mine Sequencing ........................................................................................................................ 58 3.9 Waste Processing........................................................................................................................ 60 3.10 Consents................................................................................................................................... 61 4. Statutory Context and Non-statutory Provisions ...................................................................61 5. Assessment of Environmental Effects ...................................................................................65 5.1 Landscape Effects ....................................................................................................................... 65 5.2 Nature and Conservation Values and Biodiversity ....................................................................... 78 5.3 Effects on Aquatic Ecosystems .................................................................................................... 89 5.3.1 Effects on stream habitat, flora and fauna ............................................................................... 90 5.3.2 Effects on tarns........................................................................................................................ 91 5.3.3 Effects of sediment addition .................................................................................................... 91 5.3.4 Effects of Site Access................................................................................................................ 92 5.3.5 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internal Correspondence
    Internal Correspondence Our ref: Your ref: To: PRSG – T. Wilkes Date: From: Terrestrial Ecosystems Unit – J. Marshall Subject: Te Kuha Coal Mine Summary • The applicant has provided appropriate and adequate information to assess the vegetation and flora values of the proposed industrial footprint, the impact of the proposal on those values and potential mitigation and compensation actions • The vegetation and flora values within the Westport Water Conservation Reserve, the Ballarat and Mount Rochfort Conservation Areas and the Lower Buller Gorge Scenic Reserve are clearly significant, particularly the degree of intactness but also the degree of connectivity to other large and relatively unmodified areas of high ecological value, and because of the presence of several “Naturally Uncommon Ecosystems”, two Nationally Threatened plant species, one and potentially two or three plant species in decline – at risk of extinction, and six species with scientifically interesting distributions. • The site is an ecologically important part of the Ecological District and Region. The elevated Brunner coal measures ecosystems are nationally unique: Te Kuha and Mt William are distinguished from all other parts of the elevated Brunner coal measures as they are the only discrete parts of the system that are essentially intact with no significant disruption to ecological patterns and processes and they represent the best example of coastal hillslope forest remaining on elevated Brunner coal measures. • The impacts, both in short and long time frames on significant biodiversity values of an opencast coal mine and associated infrastructure, are significant; the remedial effects of active restoration and site rehabilitation will be limited. • The suggested mitigation actions include avoidance measures, remedial actions and some mitigation and/or compensation suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Buller District Council Bylaw Amendment to the Buller District
    Buller District Council Bylaw Amendment to the Buller District Council general bylaw NZS 9201 Part 12 Control of Dogs Section 206 Control of dogs 1204.5 Dogs may be exercised free of restraining devices under the owners constant observation and voice control where there is no likelihood to contravene Section 1204.2 of these Bylaws in the following areas: (1) River edges, beach frontage, including dune areas (excluding conservation areas), or (2) The Westport domain, Brougham street domain, the southern end of the Carters beach domain or, (3) In Reefton, the Strand, adjacent the racecourse on the Crampton road reserve, and the old cemetery on Buller Road. 1205.3 Where a dog is not under control in terms of Section 1202 of this bylaw, the dog control officer may, where the owner is known, and has not been convicted of an offence, or been the recipient of an infringement notice and the dog has not been impounded within the preceding 12 month period, return the dog to the owner forthwith, providing, (a) The owner can be readily located, and (b) The owner is able to receive the dog, and (c) The owner is willing to pay a recovery fee, and (d) The dog if over 3 months of age is registered, and Buller District Council, P O Box 21, Westport Ph: (03) 788 9111 Fax (03) 788 8041 www.bullerdc.govt.nz (e) The conditions under which the dog is kept are satisfactory 1205.4 Any dog that has been impounded due to lack of control shall not be released unless the dog control officer is satisfied that the conditions and facilities under which the dog is normally kept are of a standard to prevent the dog from being able to roam at large.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Mine Accident Index (Updated 26 Apr 2014) A0128 Sherard Collection. Russell L. & Lyn Wood Mining History Archiv
    New Zealand Mine Accident Index (updated 26 Apr 2014) A0128 Sherard Collection. Russell L. & Lyn Wood Mining History Archive, Arthur Lakes Library, Colorado School of Mines Years covered: 1879-1958 Sources: Mines Statement by New Zealand Minister of Mines Department, vols 1887-1958. 1 Appendices to the Journals of the Hosue of Representatives, New Zealand. 2 Deaths from Mining at Denniston, 1881-1906. Coal and Coal Mining, Encyclopedia of New Zealand (website). 3 Kaitangata Mine Disaster, 22 Feb 1879. Greta's Place. Angelfire.com (website). 4 Kaitangata Mine Disaster, 21 Feb 1879, Balclutha, South Island, New Zealand. Sooty's Page, Rootsweb, Ancestry.com (website). 5 Brunner Coal Mine Disaster Memorial. NZ [New Zealand] History (website). 6 New Zealand Disasters and Tragedies - Brunner Mine, Brunnerton, Greymouth, Thursday 26 March 1896. Sooty's Page, Rootsweb, Ancestry.com (website). 7 New Zealand Archives, 2001-11 thread. Rootsweb, Ancestry.com (website). 8 Huntly, Waikato, New Zealand - Mine Disaster, Saturday 12 September 1914. Sooty's Page, Rootsweb, Ancestry.com (website). 9, 10 Waikato Coalfields Museum. Educational Resource: Teacher's Unit (.pdf on website). 11 Strongman Mine Disaster, Greymouth, West Coast, South Island, NZ, Thursday 19 January 1967. Sooty's Page, Rootsweb, Ancestry.com (website). 12 Mining Accidents on the Hauraki Goldfields. Thames NZ: Genealogy & History Resources (website). 13 Mining. Thames NZ: Genealogy & History Resources (website). 14 AJHR's [Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives]: More years online now. Thames NZ: Genealogy & History Resources (website). 15 Mines Statement - New Zealand, vols. 1897-1917. 16 National Library of New Zealand. AtoJsOnline (website). 17 Hampton, Denis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump
    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INERTINITE-RICH LUMP COALS. Nandi Malumbazo A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philoso- phy in the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering at the University of the Witwatersrand. Johannesburg, 2011 DECLARATION I, Nandi Malumbazo, declare that the thesis entitled: “CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INER- TINITE-RICH LUMP COALS” is my own work and that all sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and ac- knowledged by means of references. Signature: ……………………………………………………………….. Date:………………………………………………………………………… Page i ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Two Highveld inertinite-rich lump coals were utilized as feed coal samples in order to study their physical, chemical structural and petrographic variations during heat treat- ment in a packed-bed reactor unit combustor. The two feed lump coals were selected as it is claimed that Coal B converts at a slower rate in a commercial coal conversion process when compared to Coal A. The reason for this requires detailed investigation. Chemical structural variations were determined by proximate and coal char CO2 reactiv- ity analysis. Physical structural variations were determined by FTIR, BET adsorption methods, XRD and 13C Solid state NMR analysis. Carbon particle type analysis was con- ducted to determine the petrographic constituents of the reactor generated samples, their maceral associations (microlithotype), and char morphology. This analysis was undertaken with the intention of tracking the carbon conversion and char formation and consumption behaviour of the two coal samples within the reactor. Proximate analysis revealed that Coal A released 10 % more of its volatile matter through the reactor compared to Coal B.
    [Show full text]
  • Epithermal Gold Mines
    Mine Environment Life-cycle Guide: epithermal gold mines Authors JE Cavanagh1, J Pope2, R Simcock1, JS Harding3, D Trumm2, D Craw4, P Weber5, J Webster-Brown6, F Eppink1 , K Simon7 1 Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research 2 CRL Energy 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury 4 School of Geological Sciences, University of Otago 5 O’Kane Consulting 6 Waterways Centre 7 School of Environment, University of Auckland © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd and CRL Energy Ltd 2018 This information may be copied or reproduced electronically and distributed to others without limitation, provided Landcare Research New Zealand Limited and CRL Energy Limited are acknowledged as the source of information. Under no circumstances may a charge be made for this information without the express permission of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited and CRL Energy Limited. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Mine Environment Life-cycle Guide series extends the New Zealand Minerals Sector Environmental Framework previously developed by Landcare Research (as Contract Report LC2033), CRL Energy, and the Universities of Canterbury and Otago, in conjunction with end-users including the Department of Conservation, the West Coast Regional Council, Environment Southland, Solid Energy, OceanaGold, Francis Mining, Bathurst Resources, Newmont, Waikato Regional Council, and the Tui Mine Iwi Advisory Group. Contributors to the previous framework also included Craig Ross. The Mine Environment Life-cycle Guide has been developed with input from end-users including the Department of Conservation, Straterra, West Coast Regional Council, Waikato Regional Council, Northland Regional Council, New Zealand Coal and Carbon, OceanaGold, Bathurst Resources, Solid Energy New Zealand, Tui Mine Iwi Advisory Group – in particular Pauline Clarkin, Ngātiwai Trust Board, Ngāi Tahu, and Minerals West Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Walks in the Westport Area, West Coast
    WEST COAST Look after yourself Your safety is your responsibility Walks in the Choose a walk that matches the weather and your own • Plan your trip experience, and interests you. Know what the weather • Tell someone your plans is doing – it can change dramatically in a short time. • Be aware of the weather Westport area Call at Department of Conservation (DOC) offices or Visitor Centres to check current weather and • Know your limits track conditions. • Take sufficient supplies Times given are a guide only, and will vary depending on Visit www.mountainsafety.org.nz to learn more. fitness, weather and track conditions. For walks longer than an hour, pack a small first aid kit and take extra food and drink. Insect repellent is recommended to ward off sandflies and mosquitoes. Cape Foulwind Walkway Photo: Miles Holden The combined output of coal mines and sawmills helped create a remarkable railway up the sheer-sided Ngakawau Gorge to Charming Creek. It is now used by thousands of walkers who rate it one of the best walkways around. Westport had the West Coast’s earliest gold diggings The Westport area extends from and has some of the best-preserved reminders of this the Mokihinui River in the north vibrant period. Your historical wanderings can range from the haunting hillside site of Lyell, which many to Tauranga Bay in the south, and motorists pass unaware of, to the lonely Britannia inland to the Buller Gorge, including battery, reached by determined trampers via a several mountain ranges. It is valley track. wonderfully diverse. Even the highways have historic features, including Hawks Crag, a low-roofed ledge blasted out of solid There is a great range of walking rock in the lower Buller Gorge, and the stone-piered Iron Bridge in the upper gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Evidence: Paul Williams: Proposed Mokihinui Hydro
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2010-CHC-115, 123, 124 AND 135 IN THE MATTER of Appeals pursuant to Section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WEST COAST ENT INC Appellant AND ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant AND WHITE WATER NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant AND DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Appellant AND WEST COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL AND BULLER DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondents ....Continued over leaf _____________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF PAUL WORTHING WILLIAMS FOR DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Dated: 13 May 2012 _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Department of Conservation, West Coast Tai o Poutini Conservancy Private Bag 701, Sewell Street HOKITIKA Ph 03 756 9100 Fax 03 756 9188 Counsel Acting: A Cameron, D van Mierlo 2 AND MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Applicant AND FRIDA INTA Section 274 Party AND WHANAU PIHAWAI WEST – RICHARD WAYNE BARBER AND IRI MAY BARBER MILNER Section 274 Party AND J MacTAGGART Section 274 Party AND ORION ENERGY NZ LTD, ALPINE ENERGY LTD, MAIN POWER NZ LTD AND ELECTRICITY ASHBURTON LTD Section 274 Party AND NZ RAFTING INC Section 274 Party AND ANN SHERIDAN Section 274 Party AND BULLER ELECTRICITY Section 274 Party 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE...............................4 2. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE............................................................5 3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS...................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • The Coal Mining Heritage of Lafayette
    The Coal Mining Heritage of Lafayette From the late I 880s until the I 930s, Lafayette was a major coal town. Read the history of the coal mining era, examine the location of coal mines within the Lafayette area, and enjoy historic photos of the Waneka Lake Power Plant and the Simpson Mine with the attached Coal Mines of the Lafaveti’e Area brochure. This brochure was created by the Lafayette Historic Preservation board, and it highlights the fascinating Coal Mining Heritage of Lafayette. oft/ic — • Coal Mines Lafayette Area page 1 • Coal Mines of the Lafayette Area - page 2 • Coal Mines f the Lfa)’ette Area — map ____________________________ Historic Preservation Board, City of Lafayette, Colorado The social legacy. The social legacy of mining is equally important to contemporary Lafayette The mines required far more labor than was available locally and quickly attracted experienced miners and laborers from Europe and other parts of the U.S. The result was a community comprised of many ethnic groups, including Welsh, English. Scottish, Irish, central European, Hispanic, Italian, and Swedish workers and their families. Local farmers and ranchers also shared in the coal boom and worked as miners in the winter when coal production was high and agricultural work slow. A sense of this ethnic diversity can be gained by walking through the Lafayette cemetery at Baseline and 111th Street. The variety of family names gives a sense of the many nationalities that have contributed to Lafayette’s history. Although the mining life was hard, families were fun-loving and many social activities centered around schools and churches.
    [Show full text]
  • References for Chapters 7-9, 11
    REFERENCES Adams, L.M., J.P. Capp and D.W. Gillmore. 1972. Coal mine spoil and refuse bank reclamation. In: Third Mineral Waste Utilization Symposium. Chicago, IL. Adriano, D.C., A.L. Page, A.A. Elseewi, A.C. Chang, and I. Straughan. 1980. Utilization and disposal of fly ash and other coal residues in terrestrial ecosystems: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality. 9:333-344. Adriano, D.C., T.A. Woodford and T.G. Ciravolo. 1978. Growth and elemental composition of corn and bean seedlings as influenced by soil application of coal ash. Journal of Environmental Quality. 7:416-421. Allison, J.D., D.S. Brown and K.J. Novo-Gradac. 1992. MINTEQA2, Geochemical Assessment Model for Environmental Systems. Version 3, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Arndt, H.H. 1971. Geological Map of the Mount Carmel Quadrangle. Columbia, Northumberland and Schuylkill Counties, Pennsylvania. Map GQ-919. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey. Ash, S.H. and W.L. Eaton. 1947. Barrier pillars in the anthracite region of Pennsylvania. Am. Inst. Min. and Met. Eng. Tech. Pub. 2289. 20pp. Ash, S.H. 1950a. Buried valley of the Susquehanna River. U.S. Bureau of Mines Bull. 494, 27 pp. Ash, S.H. 1950b. Data on pumping at the Anthracite mines of Pennsylvania. U.S. Bureau of Mines R.I. 4700, 264 pp. Ash, S.H., E.W. Felegy, D.O. Kennedy and P.S. Miller. 1951. Acid-Mine-Drainage Problems. Anthracite Region of Pennsylvania. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Bull. 508, 72 pp. Ash, S.H., B.S. Davies, H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Review West Coast Regional Coastal
    Review of West Coast Region Coastal Hazard Areas Prepared for West Coast Regional Council June 2012 Authors/Contributors: Richard Measures Helen Rouse For any information regarding this report please contact: Helen Rouse Resource Management Consultant +64-3-343 8037 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd 10 Kyle Street Riccarton Christchurch 8011 PO Box 8602, Riccarton Christchurch 8440 New Zealand Phone +64-3-348 8987 Fax +64-3-348 5548 NIWA Client Report No: CHC2012-081 Report date: June 2012 NIWA Project: ELF12226 © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • Come Join Us in “New Zealand's Happiest Place”*
    THE BULLER GUIDE TO LIVING WELL Come join us in “New Zealand’s Happiest Place”* * The Happiness of New Zealand Report – UMR Research 2012 Top 10 reasons why people move here • Easy lifestyle and quality of life • We’re kid-safe and family focused • A strong sense of community and caring • So much to see and do right on your doorstep • World-renowned scenery • Get a great house on an average wage • Getting to work, school or play takes just minutes • An unbeatable range of sport and recreation • Great retail, support services and cafes • Great transport links to main centres Click on our interactive menu and links throughout to go directly to the section you would like to see. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 great Housing, Perfect Place Education & Sports, Health and Culture, Relocation reasons Living for the Active Community Recreation, Wellbeing The Arts, Support Intro Essentials Retiree Learning Entertainment Heritage & Useful & Climate contacts SPACE & freedom The Buller district covers Reefton just less than 8600 square – gateway to the Buller from the Lewis Pass route from kilometers with 84% in Christchurch - born from gold in the 1860’s and now a conservation land and National modern goldmining town with a wonderfully preserved Park. All of this wonderful play heritage main street. Entry way to the magnificent Victoria Conservation Park. area for a population of around 10,000 people! Westport Choose your town – – our biggest little town of around 5,500 with all mod cons. The service centre for the Buller sited at the mouth or go country of the Buller River.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Thoughts for Westport
    AMENITIES / INFRASTRUCTURE (85) – KEY WORDS Water (66) Priorities (25) Rubbish (13) Public Toilets (6) Sewage (5) Cost (3) Environmental Impact (2) Health (4) Gardens (2) Rates (2) Storm Water (2) Cemetery (1) Compost (1) Consultation (1) Gutters (1) Investment (1) New Residents (1) North Beach (1) Plans (1) Water first Water, Priorities AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Drinking Water AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Please improve the water situation Water AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Have drinkable clean water Water AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Water that we can drink Water AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE What will be done about the water in Westport? It tastes and smells awful. What are your plans how to fix this Water, Priorities and when? AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Fix our drinking water now Water, Priorities AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Fix drinking water urgently Water, Priorities AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Get the drinking water sorted quickly Water, Priorities AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Make sure water is working properly before fancy stuff Water, Priorities AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Fix water first Water, Priorities AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Our first priority should be water. Highly chemicalised. Water is making me sick and buying it from the shop is Water, Priorities, Health making me poor. Please make this priority number one AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Drinking water is terrible. Living on the West Coast and Water not being able to drink the tap water is not acceptable AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE I have drunk better water in Guatemala. Three years I have lived here and there has been no improvement. Water Sort it out AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Decent water supply Water AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE AMENITIES / AMENITIES / AMENITIES / AMENITIES / AMENITIES / INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE Waterfirst Fixthe water, 2015or sooner Water,Priorities Water Water isdrinkablethat please Water Firstwater Water,Priorities Water Water,Priorities Fix the water problem Water AMENITIES/ INFRASTRUCTURE Water water everywhere and not a drop worth drinking.
    [Show full text]