PACIT PF May 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PACIT PF May 2008 PACIT (#56b)—Proposed Finding TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS UNDER THE CRITERIA.............................................................9 Criterion 83.7(a).................................................................................................................11 Criterion 83.7(b) ................................................................................................................14 Criterion 83.7(c).................................................................................................................32 Criterion 83.7(d) ................................................................................................................48 Criterion 83.7(e).................................................................................................................48 Criterion 83.7(f) .................................................................................................................53 Criterion 83.7(g) ................................................................................................................54 FIGURES APPENDICES BIBLIOGRAPHY Summary under the Criteria for the Amended Proposed Finding on the POINTE-AU-CHIEN INDIAN TRIBE INTRODUCTION The Office of the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs (AS-IA) within the Department of the Interior (Department) issues this proposed finding in response to the petition the Department received from the group known as the Pointe-au-Chien Indian Tribe (PACIT) of Louisiana. The petitioner seeks Federal acknowledgment as an Indian tribe under Part 83 of Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations (25 CFR Part 83), “Procedures for Establishing that an American Indian Group Exists as an Indian Tribe.” The evidence in the administrative record, submitted by the PACIT petitioner and third parties and obtained by Department staff through its verification research, is insufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner meets all seven mandatory criteria required for Federal acknowledgment. Specifically, the petitioner does not meet criteria 83.7(b), 83.7(c), or 83.7(e). The petitioner meets criteria 83.7(a), 83.7(d), 83.7(f) and 83.7(g). An explanation of the Department’s evaluation of each criterion is presented in sections that follow this introduction. In accordance with the regulations set forth in 25 CFR 83.10(m), failure to meet any one of the criteria in section 83.7 requires a determination that the petitioning group is not an Indian tribe within the meaning of Federal law. Therefore, the Department proposes to decline to acknowledge that the PACIT petitioner is an Indian tribe. Regulatory Procedures The acknowledgment regulations under 25 CFR Part 83 establish procedures by which an Indian group may seek Federal acknowledgment as an Indian tribe with a government-to-government relationship with the United States. To be entitled to such a political relationship with the United States, the petitioner must submit evidence demonstrating that it meets the seven mandatory criteria set forth in section 83.7 of the regulations. Failure to meet any one of the mandatory criteria will result in a determination that the group is not an Indian tribe within the meaning of Federal law. The Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA) within the Office of the AS-IA has responsibility for administering the Federal acknowledgment regulations and evaluating petitions based on the evidence in the administrative record. PACIT (#56b): Proposed Finding The time periods for the evaluation of documented petitions are set forth in the acknowledgment regulations in section 83.10. Publication of the notice of a proposed finding in the Federal Register initiates a 180-day comment period during which the petitioner and interested and informed parties may submit arguments and evidence to support or rebut the evidence relied upon in the proposed finding. Such comments should be submitted in writing to the Office of the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs, 1951 Constitution Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, Attention: Office of Federal Acknowledgment, Mail Stop 34B-SIB. Interested and informed parties must provide a copy of their comments to the petitioner. The regulations, at 25 CFR 83.10(k), provide petitioners a minimum of 60 days to respond to any comments on the proposed finding submitted during the comment period. At the end of the response period for the proposed finding, OFA shall consult with the petitioner and interested parties to determine an equitable time frame for consideration of the arguments and evidence submitted during the comment and response periods. OFA shall notify the petitioner and interested parties of the date such consideration begins. After consideration of all arguments and evidence received during the comment and response periods, the AS-IA will issue a final determination regarding the petitioner’s status. The Department will publish a notice of this final determination in the Federal Register. The Petitioner The Pointe-au-Chien Indian Tribe (PACIT), Petitioner #56b, claims to be the continuation of a historical Indian community on a bayou in south-central Louisiana that was originally settled in the mid-19th century. PACIT’s membership criteria require its members to descend from an individual living in the Bayou “Pointe-au-Chien” Indian settlement in 1900. PACIT has described its members as descendants of the historical Chitimacha, Acolapissa, Atakapa, Choctaw, and Biloxi Indian tribes. It does not claim to descend from the historical Houma tribe, although its members and their ancestors have been called “Houma” Indians since at least 1907. The petitioner’s current organization was incorporated under Louisiana law in 1993 as the “Documented Houma Tribe” and adopted the name “Pointe au Chien Indian Tribe” in 1995, adding hyphens to its name in 2005. Most of PACIT’s members previously had been members of the United Houma Nation (UHN), Petitioner #56, which received a negative proposed finding in 1994. PACIT submitted a letter of intent to petition for Federal acknowledgment in 1996. It has a written constitution as its governing document. PACIT has 682 members. Administrative History The Department received a letter of intent to petition for acknowledgment as the “Point au Chien Indian Tribe” on July 22, 1996. This letter followed a letter in 1995 from the chairman of the Biloxi, Chitimacha Confederation of Muskogees (BCCM) that stated various “Indian communities,” including “Pointe aux Chene” [sic] had withdrawn from the UHN petitioner, which had received a negative proposed finding in December 1994 (59 F.R. 66118). The BCCM group claimed ownership of the petition submitted by UHN. In 1996, BCCM advised the - 2 - PACIT (#56b): Proposed Finding Department that “the Pointe aux Chene Indian Tribe [sic] has decided to seek federal recognition independently and should not be considered a member community of this confederation.” After receiving letters of intent to petition for Federal acknowledgment from the PACIT petitioner as well as the BCCM petitioner, the Department took the position that the PACIT, BCCM, and UHN petitioners would be treated as “three separate, independent petitioners sharing a common original petition....” The Department advised the PACIT petitioner in 1997 of its decision to issue an “amended Proposed Finding” for PACIT, saying that, “[p]rocedurally, PACIT is being treated as a petitioner with a proposed finding....” The Department set a time period for PACIT to comment on the UHN proposed finding and submit its own petition documentation. The Department informed the PACIT petitioner that it would treat the petitioner as being “covered by the documented petition which was previously submitted” by the UHN petitioner. The Department also advised the petitioner that it should submit its governing document, its membership list, and a narrative responding to the UHN proposed finding. Based on this combination of new evidence and the original UHN petition documentation, the Department indicated it would issue “an amended Proposed Finding” that would “pertain specifically to the PACIT.” The amended proposed finding would also give the public an opportunity to comment on the PACIT petition. On November 10, 1997, the Department received petition documentation from the PACIT petitioner. The PACIT petition has been considered to be in “active consideration” status, together with the original UHN petition, since filing its letter of intent. The Department notified PACIT that evaluation of its petition began on February 4, 2005, and a period to submit additional materials would close on April 15. The PACIT petitioner submitted petition documentation to the Department by April 15, 2005. PACIT’s submission in 1997 consisted of approximately 900 pages of documentation: a historical overview, organizational manual, maps of southern Louisiana, a narrative entitled “Marie Gregoire,” and a collection of PACIT-designed UHN resignation forms accompanied by ancestry charts for its members. PACIT did not then submit a current membership list. PACIT’s submission in 2005 included more than 20,000 pages of narratives, meeting minutes, a membership list, folders, forms, genealogical printouts, historical documents, and maps. This submission also included electronic media, in the form of videotape recordings of a meeting, a news broadcast, and member interviews. For the purpose of evaluating and verifying
Recommended publications
  • 2013 Path Forward
    2013 Path Forward August 2013 Version 1 South Central Planning and Development Commission 2013 OZONE ADVANCE AUGUST 2013 SOUTH CENTRAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PO BOX 1870 GRAY, LA 985-851-2900 HTTP://WWW.SCPDC.ORG Page 2 2013 Path Forward Contents Introduction 4 The South Central Planning and Development (SCPDC) District 4 The Houma-Thibodaux MPO 4 Parish Population Trends 4 Table 1: Population Projections 4 Map 1: Houma-Thibodaux MPO Area 5 Settlement and Economic Activity 6 Vulnerable Populations 6 Table 2: Vulnerable Populations 6 MPO Structure 6 Map 2: Ports and Airports 7 Collaboration 8 Nearby Examples 8 Map 3: LA Metro Commute Patterns 9 Potential Strategies 9 Measuring Air Quality 10 Table 3: 8- Hour Design Values 10 Table 4: Particulate Matter Readings 10 Outreach and Education 10 Promotional Activities 12 Questions 12 Table 4: Gantt Chart 13 Appendix A: Letters of Participation 19 Appendix B: Meeting Minutes 29 Appendix C: News Articles 90 Page 3 South Central Planning and Development Commission Path Forward cal plants in the River Parishes. The raw materials are moved via a variety of transportation modes, including Introduction pipeline, marine barge, rail freight, and highway. The On July 6, 2012, the Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan River Parishes also have grain elevators, where product Planning Organization sent a letter to the Environmen- transported down the river from farms in the Mid-West tal Protection Agency (EPA) indicating its participation is stored prior to export. in the Ozone Advance Program. Shortly thereafter, on As the SCPDC district effort develops, this Path For- April 23, 2013, the MPO followed up with another let- ward document for the MPO will serve as a template ter indicating its participation in the Particulate Matter for the Path Forward for the larger, regional, six-parish Advance Program.
    [Show full text]
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 4/Thursday, January 6, 2011/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Notices 795 responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 reasonably traced between the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in unassociated funerary objects and the this notice are the sole responsibility of Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas; National Park Service the Superintendent, Natchez Trace Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town, [2253–65] Parkway, Tupelo, MS. Oklahoma; Chitimacha Tribe of In 1951, unassociated funerary objects Louisiana; Choctaw Nation of Notice of Inventory Completion for were removed from the Mangum site, Oklahoma; Jena Band of Choctaw Native American Human Remains and Claiborne County, MS, during Indians, Louisiana; Mississippi Band of Associated Funerary Objects in the authorized National Park Service survey Choctaw Indians, Mississippi; and Possession of the U.S. Department of and excavation projects. The Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana. the Interior, National Park Service, whereabouts of the human remains is Natchez Trace Parkway, Tupelo, MS; unknown. The 34 unassociated funerary Representatives of any other Indian Correction objects are 6 ceramic vessel fragments, tribe that believes itself to be culturally 1 ceramic jar, 4 projectile points, 6 shell affiliated with the unassociated funerary AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ornaments, 2 shells, 1 stone tool, 1 stone objects should contact Cameron H. ACTION: Notice; correction. artifact, 1 polished stone, 2 pieces of Sholly, Superintendent, Natchez Trace petrified wood, 2 bone artifacts, 1 Parkway, 2680 Natchez Trace Parkway, Notice is here given in accordance worked antler, 2 discoidals, 3 cupreous Tupelo, MS 38803, telephone (662) 680– with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act metal fragments and 2 soil/shell 4005, before February 7, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Incest Taboo: the Case of the Matrilineal Khasis
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 5, Ver. I (May 2017) PP 41-46 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org A Note on the Incest Taboo: The Case of the Matrilineal Khasis Davina Diengdoh Ropmay (Research Scholar, Department of Sociology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, India) Abstract : Incest Taboo serves as one important aspect under kinship studies. Understanding the rules prohibiting intimate and sexual relations with certain kin throws light on how other facets of a social organisation operate such as marriage, clan organisation and kinship terminology. The existence of the Incest Taboo among the Khasi, a major matrilineal tribal group of Meghalaya, provides us a picture on how such facets are determined. Therefore, this article attempts to describe the bounds of the incest taboo among the Khasis and the serious implication it has towards the maintenance and perpetuation of the society as a whole Keywords: Incest, Exogamy, Incest Taboo, Marriage, Khasi. I. INTRODUCTION The study of Kinship has been a much researched area in sociological and social anthropological studies. It simply seeks to understand on one hand, in what way a person is related to another, and on the other hand, in what way do these people exhibit behaviour with each other as per their relationship. Radcliffe-Brown rightly puts it “A kinship system thus presents to us a complex set of norms, of usages, of patterns of behaviour between kindred” (Radcliffe-Brown 1950: 10). Behaviour patterns which stem out of the social relations between people, customs, norms and usages are important for the functioning of the social machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate 2018
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate 2018 13th Edition A practical cross-border insight into real estate law Published by Global Legal Group with contributions from: Attorneys-at-Law Project Law Ltd Machado, Meyer, Sendacz e Opice Advogados BKA Attorneys at Law Maples and Calder Brulc Gaberščik & Partners, Law Firm, Ltd. Meyerlustenberger Lachenal AG BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates LLP Nishimura & Asahi Cordero & Cordero Abogados Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc. Cushman & Wakefield Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Gianni, Origoni, Grippo, Cappelli & Partners PAV Law Offices Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp.k Prieto Cabrera & Asociados SRL Greenberg Traurig, LLP Ropes & Gray LLP GSK Stockmann Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP Gürlich & Co. Simon Reid-Kay & Associates Hogan Lovells Tirard, Naudin Howard Kennedy Toronto CREW Konečná & Zacha Tughans Kubes Passeyrer Attorneys at Law Ziv Lev & Co. Law Office The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate 2018 General Chapters: 1 Real Estate Joint Ventures: New Paradigm or Passing Fashion? – Iain Morpeth, Ropes & Gray LLP 1 2 Serviced Offices: The Changing Face of the Real Estate Market – Rebecca Davison & Nicky Stewart, Howard Kennedy 5 Contributing Editor 3 Toronto CREW and an Outlook on the Canadian Market for 2018 – Rosalyn Wallace, Toronto CREW Iain Morpeth, & Stuart Barron, Cushman & Wakefield 9 Ropes & Gray LLP Sales Director Country Question and Answer Chapters: Florjan Osmani 4 Austria Kubes Passeyrer Attorneys at Law: Dr. David Kubes & Mag. Marko Marjanovic 12 Account Director 5 Brazil Machado, Meyer, Sendacz e Opice Advogados: Maria Flavia Candido Seabra Oliver Smith & Fatima Tadea Rombola Fonseca 20 Sales Support Manager Toni Hayward 6 Canada Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP: Heather McKean & Stella Di Cresce 30 Senior Editors 7 Costa Rica Cordero & Cordero Abogados: Hernán Cordero B.
    [Show full text]
  • DON DAVIS: –40 Horsepower and Again Going Back to Cajun Ingenuity, Which I Bet Your Grandfather Can Help Us With–
    DON DAVIS: –40 horsepower and again going back to Cajun ingenuity, which I bet your grandfather can help us with– CLIFFORD SMITH: Oh without a doubt. DAVIS: –they just figured out how to put it in but it had a – I don‟t know if you‟ve ever seen it yet – he‟d crank them this way. Alright, well you had to get up and crank them. Well if you miscranked you broke your arm. And I‟m sure and so before we leave we‟d like very much if you don‟t mind giving us the contact information and if you wouldn‟t object to just, you know, college professor types coming in and doing exactly what we‟re doing here. CARL BRASSEAUX: Harassing him like that. DD: But if we don‟t it‟s gonna stay in the DeHart family and fifty years from now when that kind of information will be probably very important we‟ll have nobody to talk to. CS: He can give you the whole history of the mechanical application– DD: Aw that‟s– CS: –of engines from the – I‟m telling you he grew up down the bayou. I bet you would – her grandfather grew up – her grandfather about the same age as I am and he probably can remember cause, I mean, he grew up down the bayou. I mean, I grew up on the bayou. He can tell you about people living in houseboats. They didn‟t live on the land; they lived in houseboats. They lived, again, they would oar out to (? 01:26) because, again, he knows this, his grandfather knows this, but before you had an engine that boomed a boat continuously – you didn‟t have a trawl.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Lilburn City Council Meeting Agenda September 14, 2020 at 7
    City of Lilburn City Council Meeting Agenda September 14, 2020 at 7:30 p.m. Zoom Meeting Council Members: Tim Dunn, Mayor Lindsay Voigt, Post 1 Scott Batterton, Post 2 Eddie Price, Post 3 Emil Powella, Post 4 I. Zoom Meeting Information Join Zoom Meeting HTTPS://ZOOM.US/J/97079473726?PWD=WJQ4ZG1AMNPIMLLIM0TQT2NDBEQYDZ09 Meeting ID: 970 7947 3726 Password: 837263 One tap mobile +16465588656,,97079473726#,,,,0#,,837263# US (New York) +13017158592,,97079473726#,,,,0#,,837263# US (Germantown) Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) Meeting ID: 970 7947 3726 Password: 837263 Find your local number: HTTPS://ZOOM.US/U/AX5UTZPF4 II. Executive Session (If Necessary) III. Call To Order IV. Roll Call V. Pledge To The Flag VI. Approval Of Agenda VII. Announcements 1. City Events l Community Yard Sale September 19, 2020, 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM @ NEW LOCATION- Railroad Avenue parking lot at Lilburn City Park l Rock the Park - September 26th CANCELLED September 26, 2020, 6:00 PM - 9:30 PM @ City Park l City of Lilburn National Night Out-EVENT CANCELLED October 6, 2020, 6:00 PM - 8:30 PM @ To be announced l Lilburn Daze Arts & Crafts Festival- CANCELLED October 10, 2020, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM @ City Park l Lilburn Food Truck Tuesday October 13, 2020, 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM @ City Park VIII. Ceremonial Matter 1. Bucket Brigade Day Proclamation - November 15, 2020 Documents: BUCKET BRIGADE DAY PROCLAMATION_.PDF IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Archives and Economies
    Volume 2005 Article 14 2005 Caddo Archives and Economies Paul S. Marceaux University of Texas at Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Marceaux, Paul S. (2005) "Caddo Archives and Economies," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2005, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2005.1.14 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2005/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Caddo Archives and Economies Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2005/iss1/14 Caddo Archives and Economies Paul Shawn Marceaux The University of Texas at Austin Introduction This article is a discussion of archival research on contact through historic period (ca. A.D. 1519 to 18th century) Caddo groups in eastern Texas and west central Louisiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring in the Bayou Teche Watershed
    Water Quality Monitoring in the Bayou Teche Watershed Researchers: Dr. Whitney Broussard III Dr. Jenneke M. Visser Kacey Peterson Mark LeBlanc Project type: Staff Research Funding sources: Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Environmental Protection Agency Status: In progress Summary The historic Bayou Teche is an ancient distributary of the Mississippi River. Some 3,000-4,000 years ago, the main flow of the Mississippi River followed the Bayou Teche waterway. This explains the long, slow bends of the small bayou and its wide, sloping banks. The Atákapa-Ishák nation named the bayou “Teche” meaning snake because the course of the bayou looked like a giant snake had laid down to rest, leaving its mark on the land. Many years later, the first Acadians arrived in Southwestern Louisiana via Bayou Teche. They settled along its banks and used the waterway as a means of transportation and commerce. The bayou remains to this day an iconic cultural figure and an important ecological phenomenon. Several modern events have reshaped the quality and quantity of water in Bayou Teche. After the catastrophic flood of 1927, the United States Congress authorized the US Army Corps of Engineers to create the first comprehensive flood management plan for the Mississippi River. One important element of this plan was the construction of the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee, which, in conjunction with the East Protection Levee, allows the Corps of Engineers to divert a substantial amount of floodwaters out of the Mississippi River into the Atchafalaya Spillway, and away from major urban centers like Baton Rouge and New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • Receipts and Disbursements (Apparent and Actual)
    COMBIXED ST% YEMENT RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS (APPARENT AND ACTUAL) THE UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAH, ENDED JUNE '30, 1894. COMBINED STATEMENT OF THE RECEIPTS A. ND DISBURSEMENTS (APPARENT AND ACTUAL) OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 80, 18N. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, DIVISION OF WARRANTS) ESTIMATES) AND APPROPRIATIONS. SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith a statement of th& revenues derived by the Government from customs, internal revenue', and sales of public lands) i» each District and State, and from the various Iniscel- laneous sources, during the fiscal year ended June 80, 1894, amounting, in the aggregate, to 8297, 722, 019.25; also, a statement of' the disbursements for the same period, by appropriations, exclusive of the principal of the public debt, showing the amounts expended by each Department for "salaries, " "ordinary expenses, " "public works, " "miscellaneous, " and "unusual and extraordinary, " aggregating ~",)67, ,~&2;), 279. 83. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, W. V. MAOLENNAN, Chief of .Division. Ho». JoHN G. CARLIsLE) ")«retary of the Treasury. (3) States and districts. Total 1 &y d ist ricts Total by St, )tes. Gross receipts. Ded o c& iona. X& t re) e it) ts. F)rom 0((&s(oms- Maine: Aroostook 521, 18,&. ?9 Bangor 101, U&j?, 7, Bath. 21, )"&l), 4 7 Belfast. .. .. 1),3+!). 92 Castine 103. 8& I'renchman Bay. 24(). 4'& Machias . 343. -'10 P assam aquoddy. 11H, 59;&. (in Portlan&l 143, 0;),&. 59 Waldoboro. Wiscasset. 109. ;),'3 8409, 4,&8. H0 New Hampshire: Portsmouth. 113, 491. 21 Vermont. 653, 761. 58 Massachusetts: Barnstable . 60. 39 ! Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARENTON BRIDGE HAER No. LA-43 (Bridge Recall No
    CHARENTON BRIDGE HAER No. LA-43 (Bridge Recall No. 008970) Carries Louisiana Highway 182 (LA 182) over Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal Baldwin St. Mary Parish Louisiana PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED & INTERPRETIVE DRAWINGS FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CHARENTON BRIDGE (Bridge Recall No. 008970) HAER No. LA-43 Location: Carries Louisiana Highway 182 (LA 182) over Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal (Charenton Canal) in the town of Baldwin, St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. The Charenton Bridge (Bridge Recall No. 008970) is located at latitude 29.825298 north, longitude - 91.537959 west.1 The coordinate represents the center of the bridge. It was obtained in 2016 by plotting its location in Google Earth. The location has no restriction on its release to the public. Present Owner: State of Louisiana. Present Use: Vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Significance: The Charenton Bridge is significant as an important example of a distinctive truss type. The bridge’s significant design feature is its K-truss configuration, characterized by the arrangement of vertical and diagonal members to form a “K” in each truss panel. The K-truss is a rare variation both nationally and in Louisiana, where there are only three extant examples of the bridge type.2 The Charenton Bridge retains good integrity and clearly conveys the significant design features of the through K-truss. It was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) in 2013 under Criterion C: Engineering at the state level of significance.3 Historian(s): Angela Hronek, Cultural Resource Specialist, and Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1954 Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mcintire, William Grant, "Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana." (1954). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8099. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8099 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HjEHisroaic smm&ws in coastal Louisiana A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by William Grant MeIntire B. S., Brigham Young University, 195>G June, X9$k UMI Number: DP69477 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69477 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest: ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]