University of Pittsburgh West-Russism, Litvinism, And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Pittsburgh West-Russism, Litvinism, And University of Pittsburgh West-Russism, Litvinism, and Aleksandr Lukashenko’s Hybrid Nationalist Rhetoric Marika Olijar Dr. Jan Musekamp HIST 1046 Revised 7 November 2020 Olijar 1 West-Russism, Litvinism, and Aleksandr Lukashenko’s Hybrid Nationalist Rhetoric Historically, Belarus is an ethnically and religiously diverse territory. Western Belarusian lands were predominantly Catholic for centuries, under the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and eventually the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth, while the predominantly Orthodox East was influenced by the Russian Empire (Rudling 32). Accordingly, the Belarusian national movement finds its roots in two diverging philosophies: Litvinism and West-Russism. The Litvin—or Krajowość—philosophy argued that “all local ethnic groups … should cooperate in the interest of the region” (Rudling 45; Wilson 61). West-Russism argued that Catholic influences strictly coincided with a Polish identity: one that Belarusians should shirk (Wilson 61). Thus, this ideology highlights the Russian-Orthodox influence on the Belarusian nation. Both of these philosophies framed ideologically divergent and fragmented nationalist movements in Belarus, which influence the current state of Belarusian nationalist rhetoric today. This divergence is demonstrated through the political tactics of Belarus’ authoritarian president, Aleksandr Lukashenko, as he synthesizes both of the diametrically opposed philosophies of Belarusian nationalism to form his own hybrid version. In this paper, I argue that Litvinism and West- Russism heavily influence President Aleksandr Lukashenko’s nationalist rhetoric, as he creates a unique rendition of Belarusian nationalism by adopting elements of both movements. I will first discuss how the two diverging nationalist philosophies formed. In the second part, I focus on the Belarusian nationalist movements of the early 20th century. In the third section, I analyze the competing Polish and Russian influences in the context of standardizing the Belarusian vernacular for each nationalist movement respectively. In the fourth part, I examine how the diverging Belarusian nationalist discourse in the Interwar and World War II era contributed to the formation of a short-lived Belarusian state. Finally, I evaluate how World War II victory and Olijar 2 the two nationalist philosophies of the 19th century comprise President Aleksandr Lukashenko’s current nationalist rhetoric. The Confessional Origins of Litvinism and West-Russism As a nation largely influenced by Polish and Russian culture, these factions primed the development of Litvinism and West-Russism and their respective movements. In the Polish- Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Belarusian language was labeled a dialect of Polish; however, by the mid 1800s, Russian scholars argued that the Belarusian language and culture was an offshoot of Russian, due to Belarusian speakers’ predominantly Orthodox affiliations (Rudling 33). This became the origin of West-Russism: an idea that a distinct Belarusian identity did not exist— though liberal adherents believed an ethnicity to exist, but with no right to national development—, and instead, Belarusians were simply Polonized Russians with an Orthodox identity tracing back to Kievan Rus’ (Silitsky and Zaprudnik 308; Rudling 34). Despite denying the existence of a distinct Belarusian identity, West-Russism served as a response to Polish-Lithuanian nation building and cultural influences: the Polish elite heavily influenced what is now West Belarusian territory via the Uniate—or Greco-Catholic—Church (Rudling 34). The Union of Lublin in 1569 marked the beginning of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which was characterized by institutional administrative and religious influence (Wilson 46). Polish administrative influence was further expanded in the Commonwealth with the Union of Brest in 1596 creating the Uniate Church: a move meant to Polonize, religiously- speaking, the nobility and undermine Orthodox influence (Silitsky and Zaprudnik li). Next, Polish was made the official language in 1697, promoting allegiance to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Silitsky and Zaprudnik li). The Uniate Church continued to expand, but mostly Olijar 3 for institutional reasons: all non-Catholic churches were banned in 1717 by the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Wilson 46). Orthodox education, rites, and traditions were stifled by these provisions, and many Orthodox churches were promptly closed or abandoned (Wilson 46). Even the Uniate Church had to prove its loyalty to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and its communion with the Catholic Church: a clandestine operation within the Sejm pushed for abolition of the Uniate Church in 1717, and the response of the Uniate Church was the Zamość Synod (Wilson 53). The Zamość Synod further Latinized the Uniate Church and Polonized its clergy—especially with respect to replacing its higher ranking members with ethnic Poles (Wilson 53). They instituted more Roman Catholic practices, like the Latin alphabet, catechism, and removing iconostases in churches (Wilson 53). For West Russianists, Uniatism, especially after the Zamość Synod, served as an excellent example of the “Polish scheme” against Russian hegemony (Silitski and Zaprudnik 308). West Russianists concerned themselves with how to sever ties with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth via ethnic terminology. Belarusians, Poles, and Lithuanians had been referring to themselves as Litvins—as a regional marker—in the Commonwealth, so West Russianists increased the use of the term Belorussian to emphasize their view of the language being a dialect of Russian in the mid-nineteenth century (Rudling 33; Wilson 71). Being a Litvin meant you were or once were a member of the Commonwealth–and not necessarily ethnically Polish–, while being Belarussian tethered you to a Russian identity. Polish-Russian tensions were evident through comprehensive policies imposed by the Russian Empire, characterized by enforced Russian language instruction in schools and the requirement for Russian to be used as the official language in courts and in the administrative sphere (Porter-Szücs 26). The Russian Empire exiled Polish-Lithuanian nobility to remote parts of the empire, with the Jamontt family, for example, Olijar 4 being sent beyond the Urals (Michalska-Bracha 17). The Empire also expelled Jesuits from its territory, as 1820 marked their expulsion from Polatsk (Wilson 67-68). With growing animosity between the Russian partition of Poland and the Imperial administration, 1831 marked a period of physical clashes known in Polish historiography as the November Uprising (Snyder 25; Kamusella 46-47), after which anti-Polish policies followed. Thus, these policies were subtextually anti-Belarusian and this uprising is even referred to as paustan’ne in modern Belarusian historiography (Kamusella 46-47). In 1839, Vilna University, a bastion of Polish- Lithuanian education, was closed and moved to Kyiv University and supplemented with a Russian-language curriculum, while the Belarusian language was prohibited from being written or printed using Latin letters (Vakar 69; Snyder 43). Another blow to Polish nationalists was the Russian Empire’s abolition of the Uniate Church in 1839, and its absorption into the Orthodox Church (Snyder 45). Thus, Belarusians were incredibly affected by the Russian Empire’s crackdown in lands once part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, as following the January Uprising of 1863, the Tsar made Russian the single official language for educational instruction and administrative purposes (Kamusella 46, 52). The opposing philosophy of West-Russism is the Litvin philosophy: a “territory-based, superethnic… ideology… based upon the historical legacy of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and…. its legacy” (Rudling 45). This legacy implied ties to Catholicism and an opposition to Orthodoxy and Russification, and it was fitting that the philosophy appealed to Catholic Poles and Belarusians alike (Rudling 45). Litvins did not dispute a Belarusian identity, and even supported the newspaper Nasha Niva, which was instrumental in establishing what it meant to be a Belarusian (Rudling 45). Both West-Russism and Litvinism were responses to a ‘Catholic- Olijar 5 Polish’ and ‘Orthodox-Russian’ takeover respectively, fostering disunity in later nationalist movements. The Early 20th Century: Belarusian Literature and the National Movement 1905 marked the first emergence of an organized Belarusian nationalist movement, as an opportunity arose after Japan’s triumph over the Russian Empire in the Russo-Japanese War (Lubachko 8). Nicholas II’s political concessions, necessitated by the Russian Revolution of 1905, permitted education in one’s native language and freedom of religious practice for non- Russians in the empire (Porter-Szücs 50-51). For example, following the Revolution of 1905, the Russian Empire lifted the Belarusian language prohibition, allowing for future publications in Belarusian (Silitski and Zaprudnik 258). The nationalist movement was left-leaning ideologically (Rudling 65). Belarusian workers rallied for higher wages and more rights, fostering a Belarusian unified identity via peasant socialism (Lubachko 8). In 1902, the Belarussian Socialist Hramada—or Union—was established, and Belarusian-language newspapers like Nasha Niva began being published in 1906 (Lubachko 9). A national awakening was seen as a means of fostering increased rights for Belarusian peasants, and the Nasha Niva newspaper editors made sure to announce that publishing
Recommended publications
  • Human Capital in the Aftermath of the Partitions of Poland Andreas Ba
    European Historical Economics Society EHES Working Paper | No. 150 | March 2019 Fading Legacies: Human Capital in the Aftermath of the Partitions of Poland Andreas Backhaus, Centre for European Policy Studies EHES Working Paper | No. 150 | March 2019 Fading Legacies: Human Capital in the Aftermath of the Partitions of Poland* Andreas Backhaus†, Centre for European Policy Studies Abstract This paper studies the longevity of historical legacies in the context of the formation of human capital. The Partitions of Poland (1772-1918) represent a natural experiment that instilled Poland with three different legacies of education, resulting in sharp differences in human capital among the Polish population. I construct a large, unique dataset that reflects the state of schooling and human capital in the partition territories from 1911 to 1961. Using a spatial regression discontinuity design, I find that primary school enrollment differs by as much as 80 percentage points between the partitions before WWI. However, this legacy disappears within the following two decades of Polish independence, as all former partitions achieve universal enrollment. Differences in educational infrastructure and gender access to schooling simultaneously disappear after WWI. The level of literacy converges likewise across the former partitions, driven by a high intergenerational mobility in education. After WWII, the former partitions are not distinguishable from each other in terms of education anymore. JEL Codes: N34, I20, O15, H75 Keywords: Poland, Human Capital, Education, Persistence * Research for this paper was conducted while the author was a Ph.D. candidate at LMU Munich. The author would like to thank Philipp Ager, Lukas Buchheim, Matteo Cervellati, Jeremiah Dittmar, Erik Hornung, Chris Muris, Christian Ochsner, Uwe Sunde, Ludger Wößmann, Nikolaus Wolf, and audiences at the University of Southern Denmark, the University of Bayreuth, UCLouvain, the FRESH Meeting 2018, the WEast Workshop 2018, and WIEM 2018 for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Historical Geography Handout
    Poland Historical Geography: Polish History through Maps and Gazetteers Daniel R. Jones, MS, AG® FamilySearch HISTORY OF POLAND Polish Commonwealth, 1600s-1795 Instead of a hereditary monarchy, they elected their own king. Because the king was elected, this allowed foreign powers to manipulate the elections for candidates, and to create turmoil for their own gain. The commonwealth was in a state of decline because of wars, political turmoil, and aristocratic rebellions. Although reforms were attempted, Poland’s neighbors saw opportunities for themselves. Partitions of Poland, 1772-1795 First partition, 1772: Rebellion occurred in 1768, bringing Poland into a civil war. Austria, Prussia, and Russia collectively decided to annex pieces of Poland for themselves during the war. Second partition, 1792: Poland institutes a constitution in 1791. This angered Russia, who encouraged another rebellion against the Polish king. Russia provided military support to the rebellion. After a few months, Russia and Prussia slice off large sections of Poland. Third partition, 1795: Some nobles were angry at their king for surrendering to Russia during the second partition, and created another uprising. Russia invaded again to crush the uprising. Russia, Austria, and Prussia decided to split the rest of Poland between themselves, and Poland disappeared off the map. Kingdom of Poland, 1815-1914 The French created the Duchy of Warsaw during the Napoleonic Wars as a semi-independent country. After the war, the Kingdom of Poland was established, but was joined to the Russian Empire; they were allowed their own constitution and military. After several uprisings, the Polish language and culture were suppressed, the kingdom was more integrated into the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Stateless Nation, Or How the "Polish Question" Stayed Afloat
    Patrice M. Dabrowski. Commemorations and the Shaping of Modern Poland. Blommington: Indiana University Press, 2004. 313 S. $45.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-253-34429-8. Reviewed by Laurie Koloski Published on HABSBURG (May, 2007) The Poles' "long nineteenth century" was in a mythologized past, and committed to an inde‐ even longer than that of most European nations, pendent Polish future. In so doing, they kept the stretching as it did from the frst partition of 1772, Polish nation, and the "Polish question," alive and when Prussia, Austria, and Russia claimed chunks well. Commemorations and the Shaping of Mod‐ of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, to 1918, ern Poland, Patrice Dabrowski's excellent new when an independent Polish state re-emerged. Be‐ study, shows how. tween the third partition of 1795 and the end of The Polish "predicament" in the nineteenth World War I, Poland as a political entity essential‐ century, as Dabrowski points out early in the ly disappeared from the map of Europe, and eth‐ book, involved "the mind of a large nation in a nic Poles found themselves governed by three dif‐ stateless body" (p. 7). This dilemma turned out to ferent imperial states. Had the partitions hap‐ be a source of inspiration for Polish national ac‐ pened a century earlier, the "Polish question" tivists who had two goals: frst, to broaden the na‐ might have settled into historical obscurity. What tion to include the peasantry (only an inclusive Poland's partitioners could not know in the late nation would be strong enough to revive an inde‐ eighteenth
    [Show full text]
  • How History Matters for Student Performance. Lessons from the Partitions of Poland Ú Job Market Paper Latest Version: HERE
    How History Matters for Student Performance. Lessons from the Partitions of Poland ú Job Market Paper Latest Version: HERE. Pawe≥Bukowski † This paper examines the effect on current student performance of the 19th century Partitions of Poland among Austria, Prussia and Russia. Despite the modern similarities of the three regions, using a regression discontinuity design I show that student test scores are 0.6 standard deviation higher on the Austrian side of the former Austrian-Russian border. This magnitude is comparable to the black vs. white test score gap in the US. On the other hand, I do not find evidence for differences on the Prussian-Russian border. Using a theoretical model and indirect evidence I argue that the Partitions have persisted through their impact on social norms toward local schools. Nevertheless, the persistent effect of Austria is puzzling given the histori- cal similarities of the Austrian and Prussian educational systems. I argue that the differential legacy of Austria and Prussia originates from the Aus- trian Empire’s policy to promote Polish identity in schools and the Prussian Empire’s efforts to Germanize the Poles through education. JEL Classification: N30, I20, O15, J24 úI thank Sascha O. Becker, Volha Charnysh, Gregory Clark, Tomas Cvrcek, John S. Earle, Irena Grosfeld, Hedvig Horvát, Gábor Kézdi, Jacek Kochanowicz, Attila Lindner, Christina Romer, Ruth M. Schüler, Tamás Vonyó, Jacob Weisdorf, Agnieszka WysokiÒska, Noam Yuchtman, the partici- pants of seminars at Central European University, University of California at Berkeley, University of California at Davis, Warsaw School of Economics, Ifo Center for the Economics of Education and FRESH workshops in Warsaw and Canterbury, WEast workshop in Belgrade, European Historical Economics Society Summer School in Berlin for their comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Belarusian National Movement in The
    EVOLUTION OF THE BELARUSIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT IN THE PAGES OF PERIODICALS (1914-1917) By Aliaksandr Bystryk Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Advisor: Professor Maria Kovacs Secondary advisor: Professor Alexei Miller CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 Abstract Belarusian national movement is usually characterised by its relative weakness delayed emergence and development. Being the weakest movement in the region, before the WWI, the activists of this movement mostly engaged in cultural and educational activities. However at the end of First World War Belarusian national elite actively engaged in political struggles happening in the territories of Western frontier of the Russian empire. Thus the aim of the thesis is to explain how the events and processes caused by WWI influenced the national movement. In order to accomplish this goal this thesis provides discourse and content analysis of three editions published by the Belarusian national activists: Nasha Niva (Our Field), Biełarus (The Belarusian) and Homan (The Clamour). The main findings of this paper suggest that the anticipation of dramatic social and political changes brought by the war urged national elite to foster national mobilisation through development of various organisations and structures directed to improve social cohesion within Belarusian population. Another important effect of the war was that a part of Belarusian national elite formulated certain ideas and narratives influenced by conditions of Ober-Ost which later became an integral part of Belarusian national ideology. CEU eTD Collection i Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Between krajowość and West-Russianism: The Development of the Belarusian National Movement Prior to WWI .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upbringing of Girls As Reflected in the Activities and Views of Blessed Marcelina Darowska
    Marcelina Knop DOI: 10.14746/bhw.2018.38.33 Department of Didactic Method and History of Parenting University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn Upbringing of Girls as Reflected in the Activities and Views of Blessed Marcelina Darowska Abstract The article presents the life and educational activities of Blessed Marcelina Darowska, the co-found­ er of the Convent of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and her views on up­ bringing of young women. Mother Marcelina’s perception of education of girls in the 19th century seemed modern and beyond her time. In her opinion, there was a need of putting a stop to produc­ ing “parlour dolls” and provide young women with practical education. For the betterment of the country, she set up schools in Jazłowiec, Jarosław, Niżniów and Nowy Sącz. The girls attending the schools were brought up according to the system developed by Marcelina Darowska, based on reli­ gious and patriotic values. The Convent of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary continues the work commenced by its founder; over time Mother Marcelina’s message remains val­ id and serves the subsequent generations of young Polish girls. Keywords: Marcelina Darowska, Convent of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Catholic schools, education of women in the nineteenth century 1. The life and educational work of Marcelina Darowska Marvelina Darowska née Kotowicz was both on the 16th1 of January 1827, as the fifth of seven children of Jan Kotowicz and Maximilia Jastrzębska. Raised in a wealthy land­ owner’s family on the Szulaki estate in the Kyiv2 province, even as a child, she showed 1 According to the Julian calendar, which was then used in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth-Century Women's Egodocuments In
    Lidia Michalska-Bracha, Nineteenth-century women’s egodocuments… DOI 10.15290/cnisk.2020.01.08.01 LIDIA MICHALSKA-BRACHA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-7429 Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach Nineteenth-century women’s egodocuments in the historian’s research workshop. (On the margins of the NPDH project: “Memoirs and letters of Polish authors from the Western Krai (Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine) 1795–1918”) Abstract The paper is devoted to the research on the nineteenth-century wom- en’s diaries, memoirs, and epistolography, carried out in the years 2013– 2017 as part of the international project of the National Program for the Development of Humanities: “Memoirs and letters of Polish authors from the Western Krai (Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine) in the years 1795–1918”. It discusses the status and role of the nineteenth-century women’s egodocu- ments in contemporary humanities. The study refers to the importance of autobiographical reflection and cultural perspective, and the major point of reference are selected examples of collections of manuscript letters, mem- oirs, and diaries of Polish women authors from the so-called Taken Lands1 (Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine) in the nineteenth century, and those women who were associated with these areas only for a period of time, as well as those who only wrote about the Taken Lands. This article focuses primarily 1 Polish historiography commonly refers to the Western Krai as the Taken/Stolen Lands or the Russian Seizure. The most western part of this area is often referred to as Kresy or Eastern Borderlands. 1(8)2020 10 STUDIA I MATERIAŁY on the collections of manuscripts in Lithuanian and Ukrainian archives and libraries (Wróblewski Library of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences in Vilni- us, Lithuanian State Historical Archives in Vilnius, Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine in Kiev, Vernadsky National Library, Central State His- torical Archives of Ukraine in Lviv, V.
    [Show full text]
  • 100Th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland 100Th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland
    100th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland 100th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland The Polish white-and-red flag is only 100 tional colours was first used on a wider Face value: 10 zł Designer: Anna Wątróbska-Wdowiarska years old, even though it is the simplest scale in 1792, during the celebrations sign symbolising the White Eagle, which of the first anniversary of the passing of Metal: Ag 925/1000 Issuer: NBP has been the emblem of Poland for eight the Constitution of 3rd May. In 1831, the Finish: proof, UV print centuries. The upper white stripe of the Sejm of the Congress Kingdom of Poland Diameter: 32.00 mm The coins, commissioned by NBP, flag symbolises the Eagle, while the red adopted a white-and-red cockade as the Weight: 14.14 g were struck by Mennica Polska S.A. one symbolises the colour of the es- official national symbol. The design of the Edge: plain cutcheon. The flag in the form in which it flag used these days was only introduced Mintage: up to 13,000 pcs All Polish collector coins feature: is used these days was introduced only by the Legislative Sejm of the reborn Re- face value; image of the Eagle established after Poland regained its independence public of Poland on 1 August 1919. In the as the state emblem of the Republic of following the partitions. In the Middle first act on the coat-of-arms and the na- Poland; inscription: Rzeczpospolita Polska Ages, the ensign carried by knights of the tional colours of the Republic of Poland, year of issue.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election
    BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security June 2011 564a Uladz Hrydzin © This report has been produced with the support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Sea Region the Baltic Sea
    TTHEHE BBALALTTICIC SSEAEA RREGIONEGION Cultures,Cultures, Politics,Politics, SocietiesSocieties EditorEditor WitoldWitold MaciejewskiMaciejewski A Baltic University Publication Baltic and East Slavic languages; 17 Yiddish Sven Gustavsson 1. Language policies in the Russian Empire In the middle of the 17th century, when the Russian Empire had recovered from political unrest, it directed its expansionist efforts towards the west and southwest, towards the Swedish and the Polish-Lithuanian states. This expansion was completed with the Congress of Vienna in 1815. The situation only changed with the revolution in 1917 and the end of World War I. Then Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland became independent states. Poland also won back parts of its former possessions in Belarus and Ukraine. With World War II, the Soviet Union restored many of the former borders of the Russian empire, recapturing Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Polish parts of Ukraine and Belarus and also incorporating most of Eastern Prussia. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 following the August coup reduced the empire’s area once again. Clearly, the history and the language policy of the Russian empire has had a great impact on the history of many of the languages and peoples in the Baltic area. A short overview is therefore appropriate here. Russification has been a part of Russian policy from the begin- ning. After Mazepa’s cooperation with the Swedish king Charles XII, all traces of Ukrainian autonomy promised in the Treaty of Perejaslavl of 1654 vanished. In 1720, even the printing of Ukrainian works was forbidden. In the Estonian and Latvian areas taken from Sweden in the Great Nordic War at the beginning of the 18th century, the Tsar, however, relied on the mostly German nobility who got extensive privileges.
    [Show full text]
  • National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to 'Nation' Practice
    National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to 'Nation' Practice Tatsiana Kulakevich SAIS Review of International Affairs, Volume 40, Number 2, Summer-Fall 2020, pp. 97-110 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/783885 [ Access provided at 7 Mar 2021 23:30 GMT from University Of South Florida Libraries ] National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to ‘Nation’ Practice Tatsiana Kulakevich This article examines the formation of nationalism in Belarus through two dimensions: elite ideology and everyday practice. I argue the presidential election of 2020 turned into a fundamental institutional crisis when a homogeneous set of ‘nation’ practices against the state ideology replaced existing elite ideology. This resulted in popular incremental changes in conceptions of national understanding. After twenty-six consecutive years in power, President Lukashenka unintentionally unleashed a process of national awakening leading to the rise of a new sovereign nation that demands the right to determine its own future, independent of geopolitical pressures and interference. Introduction ugust 2020 witnessed a resurgence of nationalist discourse in Belarus. AUnlike in the Transatlantic world, where politicians articulate visions of their nations under siege—by immigrants, refugees, domestic minority popu- lations—narratives of national and political failure dominate in Belarus Unlike trends in the Transatlantic resonate with large segments of the voting public.
    [Show full text]