Oregon Historic Preservation Plan 2018–2023

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oregon Historic Preservation Plan 2018–2023 i Oregon Historic Preservation Plan 2018–2023 Oregon State Historic Preservation Office Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................1 Issue 5: Information Sharing and Accessibility ...........................................18 Creating the 2018–2023 Oregon Historic Preservation Plan ......................3 Issue 6: Identification and Designation of Cultural Resources .................20 Purpose of the Plan ...........................................................................................4 Issue 7: Preservation, Rehabilitation, and Integration with Other Plans ...........................................................................4 Protection of Cultural Resources ............................................................23 SHPO Role and Priorities .................................................................................5 Issue 8: Grants and Funding ..........................................................................25 The Role of the Heritage Community .............................................................7 Issue 9: Economic Development ...................................................................27 Issue 10: Statutes, Ordinances, Codes, and Processes ................................29 Issues, Goals, and Objectives .........................................................................9 Issue 1: Government Partnerships ................................................................10 Implementation and Conclusion ................................................................31 Issue 2: Advocacy and Heritage Partner Networking .................................12 Appendix I: Oregon’s Cultural Resources ....................................................32 Issue 3: Public Outreach and Education .......................................................14 Appendix II: Bibliography .............................................................................38 Issue 4: Professional Preservation Education .............................................16 Front Cover – Roseburg Veterans Affairs Medical Center Below – Redmond City Hall re-opening in former High School 1 Introduction Oregon’s special places connect us to When the SHPO published the 2011–2016 II that threatened agricultural and forest our past by creating physical continuity Oregon Historic Preservation Plan, the lands, natural spaces, and livability. Led over generations and space for public nation was just coming out of one of the by Republican Governor Tom McCall, conversations about our values and identity. worst economic downturns in recent history. Oregonians proactively managed the change The ongoing process of recognizing and Development pressure on historic properties through citizen-driven land use planning. interpreting these places must be a local one, and archaeological sites lessened during this The 1973 Oregon Land Conservation driven by inclusive public participation. The period, especially in urban areas. The years and Development Act, Senate Bill 100, Oregon State Historic Preservation Office since the Great Recession brought a period introduced the first and only statewide (SHPO) enables these community-driven of sustained, if uneven, growth. The U.S. comprehensive land use planning system projects by creating a favorable environment Census reported Oregon’s population at just in the nation. Later adopted under the Act through statewide leadership and the over 3.4 million in 2000. Oregon’s population was Goal 5, which addressed over a dozen effective administration of federal and state grew to an estimated 4.1 million residents in types of resources, including historic places. programs and grants. The SHPO offers 2017 according to Portland State University’s Compliance with the revised Goal 5 Rule its many partners information, technical Population Research Center. Most of the adopted in February 2017 is optional for assistance, funding, and networking and increase came from people moving to the local jurisdictions. Communities may no collaboration opportunities to achieve their state. Oregon welcomed over 60,000 new longer regulate properties or sites listed own preservation goals. citizens between July 2016 and July 2017 in the National Register unless the local alone, many of whom are drawn by the state’s jurisdiction separately adopts additional The 2018–2023 Oregon Historic Preservation beauty and opportunity. protections through a public process or they Plan distills the ideas and comments are locally listed. But communities must collected through a broad outreach effort Growth brings benefits and, in some cases, review a proposed demolition or relocation. led by the SHPO staff. Participants spanned jarring change. Infrastructure development, With these changes, the core idea of Goal 5 Oregon’s heritage community. This included demand for housing, and other factors put is still intact: communities should engage in the SHPO’s traditional partners and pressure on cultural resources. Participants a public process to identify and protect their those involved with museums, archives, in public outreach meetings and through important historic resources. cemeteries, and local historical societies, an online survey identified threatened among other organizations, and anyone with resources as diverse as tribal sites statewide, The purpose of preservation, Goal 5, and an interest in Oregon’s culture and history. the Oregon Trail in the northeast, Central our state’s many heritage programs is not to The response was clear: Oregonians want Oregon’s irrigation canals, Astoria’s historic prevent change. Instead, preservation is a resources to carry out their local projects waterfront, southern Oregon’s Chinese sites, tool that manages change by naming those and a more thematically representative state and Portland’s neighborhoods. Participants physical pieces of the past that are critical inventory and National Register of Historic also raised the special challenges of to our story. It is a tool to ensure that these Places list. Participants emphasized the preserving historic landscapes, cemeteries, important places serve their communities need for better public education about what ships, planes, and railroad locomotives and equitably, productively, sustainably, and the heritage community does and why it is rolling stock, among other unique resources. economically into the future. important. They also expressed overarching Oregon has experienced this kind of change Concrete solutions exist to meet the concern about the impact of rapid change on before. The state saw rapid population challenges facing the heritage community, Oregon’s special places. growth and development after World War but they are not easily accomplished. The 2 | Oregon Historic Preservation Plan 2018–2023 heritage community must take responsibility collections, and practices must be saved. This proposal will likely be demolished. Historic for sharing the value of its work with the means we experts must let go of academic landscapes and archaeological sites can public. The effort requires coordination explanations and exclusive terminology. be saved through thoughtful attention to and individual commitment, qualities that Popular media can help, too. Experts tend their unique preservation challenges. When are well-represented throughout Oregon’s to write back and forth to each other in appropriate, well-interpreted landscapes and heritage community. To that end, the SHPO industry publications. To reach a broad sites are important community educational offers these guiding principles for preserving audience, the heritage community needs assets. what matters most in our changing state. to use popular media, such as newspapers, Span professional disciplines and lifestyle magazines, advertising campaigns, jurisdictions. Working toward a common and digital media. goal alongside other disciplines and at all Save what matters most. Preservation is levels of government is critical for success. a physical connection to the past. Those It does not help organizations or the buildings, sites, documents, or artifacts resources the heritage community cares from years ago can create here-and-now for to be territorial and competitive about conversations about how we remember and a project. Blurring established professional understand our history. But not every old and jurisdictional boundaries and learning building or artifact has the same significance other viewpoints often leads to better to the community. Overriding values or results than drawing a bold line in the sand. other needs are more important in some Working with housing, environment, and cases. Communities can build support by sustainability advocates and others offers focusing on those resources that truly matter exciting opportunities. to them. The heritage community will build The heritage community’s mission is even trust and credibility with the public by more important now. With the public helping guide these conversations. leading the way, professionals across Create a future for our special places. The disciplines can assist communities in long-term preservation of our special places identifying and managing their special Petersen Rock Garden, Redmond rests in finding a community use for them. places. Together, we can ensure that our past While some may become museums, cultural is preserved, interpreted, and used so that attractions, or funky breweries, most will be it is culturally and economically
Recommended publications
  • Interior the Following Appropriations Requests Were Submitted by Senator
    Interior The following appropriations requests were submitted by Senator Merkley to the Appropriations Committee for consideration as part of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies appropriations bill for fiscal year 2011. Bend Surface Water Project - $2,000,000 EPA, Bend, OR The Surface Water project has three major components: water treatment, pipeline replacement, and hydroelectric development. Funds will be put toward the estimated overall $71,000,000 cost of the project, which is to construct a water treatment plant, replace an 11 mile water pipeline, and install a small hydroelectric facility, gaining 1.2 MW of green power, further defraying the long term cost of the project. The project is required in order to replace aging infrastructure, and comply with EPA LT2 drinking water regulations governing surface water. Eastside Sewer Interceptor Project: Oak to Antler - $1,375,000 City of Redmond, Redmond, OR The east side of Redmond is poised for significant industrial and commercial growth. The City’s Desert Rise Industrial Park (State Certified, 75 shovel ready acres), Pioneer Business Park (40 acre, incubator lots), Crown Mill redevelopment (70 acre former sawmill), Greenway Business Campus (220 acre ―green-themed‖ re-development) and several other planned development or redevelopment projects exist east of US 97 and the BNSF rail line. Full buildout of the east side industrial development cannot occur without construction of a planned large diameter sewer line which parallels the BNSF rail line and intercepts/collects wastewater effluent from all east side development. The project, known as the Eastside Sewer Interceptor Project, will also have the capacity to serve the potential 900-acre large lot Department of State Land (DSL) project south of the Deschutes County Fairgrounds and Expo Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting April 16-17, 2019 Salem
    BOARD MEETING APRIL 16-17, 2019 SALEM Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Meeting Agenda April 16-17, 2019 Monday, April 15, 2019 Reception – 5:00p.m. The public is invited to join the OWEB Board and staff at a reception celebrating the 20th anniversary of OWEB. Location of Reception: Willamette Heritage Center Dye House 1313 Mill St. SE Salem, OR 97301 Directions: https://goo.gl/maps/i9yeoactTJk Tuesday, April 16, 2019 Macleay Conference & Retreat Center Fireside Hall 2887 74th Ave. SE Salem, OR 97317 Directions: https://goo.gl/maps/K4hg6vokwkx Business Meeting – 8:00 a.m. For each agenda item, the time listed is approximate. The board may also elect to take an item out of order in certain circumstances. During the public comment periods (Agenda Items F, I, J, L, O, and P), anyone wishing to speak to the board on specific agenda items is asked to fill out a comment request sheet (available at the information table). This helps the board know how many individuals would like to speak and to schedule accordingly. At the discretion of the board co-chairs, public comment for agenda items on which the board is taking action may be invited during that agenda item. The board encourages persons to limit comments to 3 to 5 minutes. Written comments will also be accepted on any item before the board. Written comments should be sent to Eric Hartstein at [email protected]. Please note that written comments received after April 9, 2019 will not be provided to the board in advance of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers! 0 Pioneers! Walt Whitman, Yloneersith Uc'ji-Ioneers-I--Is Table Ofcontents
    P1 OEERS! Through the battle, through defeat, moving yet andnever stopping, Pioneers! 0 pioneers! Walt Whitman, YloneersITh Uc'Ji-ioneers-i--is Table ofcontents K / \frJ \ \\ \\ / .,- \\ /\ / \\ /If' ! ABI,j 'Thebest people The Siletz God ever made' 2 Indians 16 - - Oregon Agricultural College 6 Curator of a most private museum 8 A 'surfman' r remembers 11 -----' -r---__:,2--- - Philomath College 14 Ji ' floskins: a fort 20 - - that couldn't 24 A Eddyville's Eddy 26 A window on Chautauqua is coming 28 the river 23 'The best people Godevermade' by Judy Carlson In the fall of 1852. / with others began preparing for it. First, twenty-one wagons had to to talk of the Oregon Country and the longer be made, then the oxen and horses chosen, and we talked about it the bigger it got. So those finally the necessary provisions collected. of us that had the fever. when we would meet each other, that would be the first thing to Provisions of flour, bacon, beans, sugar. talk about ... all we knew about Oregon salt, sea biscuit and such like were packed in would be when someone would come back long sacks and loaded in the lower deck of by that time it would go through a half the wagons; while the lighter provisions, such dozen hands... the virgin grass would grow as had to be gotten at three times a day, a so tall in the great Willamette Valley that a medicine box for each family and the bedding man on horse back could tie it over his head and clothing were placed on the upper deck.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Country Welcome To
    Travel Guide To OREGON Indian Country Welcome to OREGON Indian Country he members of Oregon’s nine federally recognized Ttribes and Travel Oregon invite you to explore our diverse cultures in what is today the state of Oregon. Hundreds of centuries before Lewis & Clark laid eyes on the Pacific Ocean, native peoples lived here – they explored; hunted, gathered and fished; passed along the ancestral ways and observed the ancient rites. The many tribes that once called this land home developed distinct lifestyles and traditions that were passed down generation to generation. Today these traditions are still practiced by our people, and visitors have a special opportunity to experience our unique cultures and distinct histories – a rare glimpse of ancient civilizations that have survived since the beginning of time. You’ll also discover that our rich heritage is being honored alongside new enterprises and technologies that will carry our people forward for centuries to come. The following pages highlight a few of the many attractions available on and around our tribal centers. We encourage you to visit our award-winning native museums and heritage centers and to experience our powwows and cultural events. (You can learn more about scheduled powwows at www.traveloregon.com/powwow.) We hope you’ll also take time to appreciate the natural wonders that make Oregon such an enchanting place to visit – the same mountains, coastline, rivers and valleys that have always provided for our people. Few places in the world offer such a diversity of landscapes, wildlife and culture within such a short drive. Many visitors may choose to visit all nine of Oregon’s federally recognized tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • April 30, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell the Honorable Nancy
    April 30, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Minority Leader McCarthy: The National Trust for Historic Preservation and the 379 undersigned preservation organizations and businesses thank you for your extraordinary efforts in acting to address so many of our nation’s needs in our current health and economic emergency. The enactment of the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and other response legislation provided essential funding and programs to begin our nation’s recovery. The CARES Act provided much needed funding for the nonprofit sector, including the arts and humanities, and we thank you for those provisions, including: • The Paycheck Protection Program and its forgivable loans to benefit small businesses and nonprofit organizations; • Providing a universal above-the-line deduction for taxpayers making charitable contributions; and • Creating additional funding for the National Endowment for the Arts ($75 million), National Endowment for the Humanities ($75 million), and the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) ($50 million). We are also extraordinarily thankful for last week’s Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act that will provide an additional $321 billion for the Paycheck Protection Program. This program is essential to ensuring economic vitality and meeting the The Watergate Office Building 2600 Virginia Avenue NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20037 E [email protected] P 202.588.6000 F 202.588.6038 SavingPlaces.org needs of nonprofit organizations and the small business community, especially Main Street businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Tour Schedule* Fees Tour Reservations
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Oregon Caves National Monument and Preserve Cave Tour Schedule* \o Cave lours Tuesday and Wednesday Mareli 19 - May 7 March ] 9 to Memorial Day weekend 10 am - 4 pm After Memorial Day weekend to Labor Day 9 am - 6 pm After Labor Day to Columbus Day 9 am - 4 pm After Columbus Day to first Sunday in November 10 am - 4 pm Early November to late March: No Cave Tours offered '•'Subject to change, please call or check website for the latest information. Fees 15 years and younger $7.00 per person 16 years and older $10.00 per person Tour Reservations: www.recreation.gov Reserve ahead of time; standby tours sell out fast, especially in the summer. For daily information on tour availability stop at the Illinois Valley Visitor Center, 201 Caves Hwy, Cave Junction, OR. Be Prepared for your Cave Tour The Discovery Tour lasts 90-minutes. The route is moderately strenuous and is not recommended for people with heart, breathing, or walking problems. The entire experience is 1-mile, requires frequent twisting and bending, and includes more than 500 uneven stairs. Temperature inside the cave is 44°F (7°C). Children For safety, children must be at least 42" inches tall. Children may not be carried through die cave. Help us Protect our Bats! To prevent the spread of White-nose Syndrome do not bring clothes, shoes or equipment used in another cave or mine. Visitors Cepter Exhibit Visitors Center Exhibit wheelchairs. People with knee, Explore the unique geology of the back, or similar concerns are not caves in our interactive exhibit.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Processes Shaping Willamette Valley
    BEHIND THE SCENES: INVESTIGATING PROCESSES SHAPING WILLAMETTE VALLEY ARCHITECTURE 1840-1865 WITH A CASE STUDY IN BROWNSVILLE by SUSAN CASHMAN TREXLER A THESIS Presented to the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2014 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Susan Cashman Trexler Title: Behind the Scenes: Investigating Processes Shaping Willamette Valley Architecture 1840-1865 With a Case Study in Brownsville This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation by: Dr. Susan Hardwick Chairperson Liz Carter Committee Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research and Innovation; Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2014 ii © 2014 Susan Cashman Trexler iii THESIS ABSTRACT Susan Cashman Trexler Master of Science Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation June 2014 Title: Behind the Scenes: Investigating Processes Shaping Willamette Valley Architecture 1840-1865 With a Case Study in Brownsville This thesis studies the diffusion of architectural types and the rise of regionally distinct typologies in the Willamette Valley’s settlement period (1840-1865) in Oregon. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze the dispersion of architectural types within the Willamette Valley revealed trends amongst the extant settlement architecture samples. Brownsville, Oregon, was identified to have a locally-specific architectural subtype, the closer study of which enabled deeper investigation of the development of architectural landscapes during the Willamette Valley’s settlement period.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Energy Facility Siting Council of the Stat
    1 BEFORE THE ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL OF THE STATE OF OREGON 2 3 In the Matter of the Request for FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, 4 Amendment 4 of the Site Certificate for ET AL.’S REQUEST FOR A the SUMMIT RIDGE WIND FARM CONTESTED CASE PROCEEDING 5 6 7 I. INTRODUCTION 8 Pursuant to OAR 345-027-0071, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Oregon Wild, the 9 Oregon Natural Desert Association, Central Oregon LandWatch, and the East Cascades 10 11 Audubon Society (collectively, “Requesters”) request that the Energy Facility Siting Council 12 (“EFSC” or “Council”) conduct a contested case proceeding on the Request for Amendment 4 of 13 the Site Certificate for the Summit Ridge Wind Farm (“Project”), and allow Requesters to 14 participate as parties in the proceeding.1 15 16 It has been nearly ten years since the preliminary application for this Project was filed, 17 and nearly eight years since the Project was first approved. As a point of reference, in 2009, 18 when the Project was first applied for, Ted Kulongoski was Governor of Oregon, and Barack 19 Obama was in his first year as President of the United States. Since then, much has changed. The 20 Project has been abandoned by the initial developer, sold and transferred to a new owner 21 22 (“Pattern Energy,” “Pattern,” or “Applicant”),2 and the Project’s deadlines for beginning and 23 1 24 Requesters incorporate into this Request for Contested Case their February 21, 2019 comment letter to the Council (attached hereto as Exhibit A), the February 21, 2019 comment letter of Shawn 25 Smallwood, PhD to the Council (attached hereto as Exhibit B), and the oral comments of Friends’ Senior Staff Attorney Nathan Baker at the February 22, 2019 public hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDX Celebrate It’S Two Year Anniversary on June 7 at 6:30 Pm
    Our Where’s Growing Early 28th Ave. Q Revolution Newspaper Year Page 14 Page 8 Page 3 JUNE SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2017 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 28 No 6 Portland, OR Infill on Steroids Gains State Traction: Riles Residents BY MIDGE PIERCE and old. But opponents say the Oregon A bill known as a “Build Baby Build” Home Builders Association (OHBA) legislative bill under the idea of addressing and others twisted it into a bill that over- emergency housing statewide is fueling rides local zoning and undermines city what critics call a widespread assault controls. The bill would allow building to on Oregon cities’ self-determination maximum density and heights potentially and livability. Adding insult, the bill is disregarding critical local planning tools barreling through the state legislature like discretionary design reviews. without adequate public hearing. As outrage mounted last month at House Bill 2007 would essentially an informational meeting in Salem, House Overview of the proposed cascading soaking pools between reservoirs 5 and 6. eliminate single family residential Speaker Tina Kotek slammed opponents as Designed by Jennifer Moran neighborhoods by making multi-plex infill racist NIMBYS. Arriving late to advocate housing mandatory across the state. The for the “high-yield” housing bill she Mt. Tabor Park Thermal Baths bill would permit duplexes and ADUs sponsored, she condemned “race-based everywhere in cities and towns of at least housing policies” and said opposition is An Idea for Preserving the Reservoirs, Creating 2500 residents. “grounded in Nimbyism” by well-heeled Energy, and Raising Revenue Critics call it a stealth bill that is residents using discriminatory practices Infill inflation modeled after Portland’s that restrict others from building wealth BY AMY PETERSON PSU SCHOOL OF ARCHI- in 2006, the city cannot use the open controversial Residential Infill Project and power.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation and Conclusions
    "LIKE NUGGETS FROM A GOLD MINEu SEARCHING FOR BRICKS AND THEIR MAKERS IN 'THE OREGON COUNTRY' B~f' Kmtm (1 COfwer~ ;\ th¢...i, ...uhmineJ Ilt SOIl(mla Slale UFU vcr,il y 11'1 partial fulfiUlT'Ietlt of the fCqlJln:mcntfi for the dcgr~ of MASTER OF ARTS tn Copyright 2011 by Kristin O. Converse ii AUTHORlZAnON FOR REPRODUCnON OF MASTER'S THESISIPROJECT 1pM' pernlt"j(m I~ n:pnll.lm.:til.m of Ihi$ rhais in ib endrel)" \Ii' !tbout runt\er uuthorilAtlOO fn.)m me. on the condiHt)Jllhat the per",)f1 Of a,eocy rl;!'(lucMing reproduction the "'OS$. and 1:Jf't)vi~ proper ackruJwkd,rnem nf auth.:If'l'htp. III “LIKE NUGGETS FROM A GOLD MINE” SEARCHING FOR BRICKS AND THEIR MAKERS IN „THE OREGON COUNTRY‟ Thesis by Kristin O. Converse ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: The history of the Pacific Northwest has favored large, extractive and national industries such as the fur trade, mining, lumbering, fishing and farming over smaller pioneer enterprises. This multi-disciplinary study attempts to address that oversight by focusing on the early brickmakers in „the Oregon Country‟. Using a combination of archaeometry and historical research, this study attempts to make use of a humble and under- appreciated artifact – brick – to flesh out the forgotten details of the emergence of the brick industry, its role in the shifting local economy, as well as its producers and their economic strategies. Procedure: Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis was performed on 89 red, common bricks archaeologically recovered from Fort Vancouver and 113 comparative samples in an attempt to „source‟ the brick.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscapes Inventory: Oregon Caves Historic District
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2014 Oregon Caves Historic District Oregon Caves National Monument Oregon Caves Historic District Oregon Caves National Monument Table of Contents Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Inventory Unit Description .............................................................................................................. 4 Site Plans .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Property Level, CLI Number, Park Information .............................................................................. 7 Concurrence Status Inventory Status ............................................................................................................................... 8 Concurrence Status .......................................................................................................................... 8 Geographic Information and Location Map Inventory Unit Boundary Description ............................................................................................. 9 State and County ............................................................................................................................ 10 Size................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Valley Voices: Connecting Generations
    Willamette Valley Voices: Connecting Generations A publication of the Willamette Heritage Center at The Mill Digital Proofer Editor: Keni Sturgeon, Willamette Heritage Center Editorial board: Willamette Valley Vo... Hannah Marshall, Western Oregon University Authored by Willamette Heritag... Duke Morton, Western Oregon University 7.0" x 10.0" (17.78 x 25.40 cm) Jeffrey Sawyer, Western Oregon University Black & White on White paper Amy Vandegrift, Willamette Heritage Center 78 pages ISBN-13: 9781478201755 ISBN-10: 1478201754 Please carefully review your Digital Proof download for formatting, grammar, and design issues that may need to be corrected. We recommend that you review your book three times, with each time focusing on a different aspect. Check the format, including headers, footers, page 1 numbers, spacing, table of contents, and index. 2 Review any images or graphics and captions if applicable. 3 Read the book for grammatical errors and typos. Once you are satisfied with your review, you can approve your proof and move forward to the next step in the publishing process. To print this proof we recommend that you scale the PDF to fit the size © 2012 Willamette Heritage Center at The Mill of your printer paper. Willamette Valley Voices: Connecting Generations is published biannually – summer and winter – by the Willamette Heritage Center at The Mill, 1313 Mill Street SE, Salem, OR 97301. Nothing in the journal may be reprinted in whole or part without written permission from the publisher. Direct inquiries to Curator, Willamette Heritage Center, 1313 Mill Street SE, Salem, OR 97301 or email [email protected]. www.willametteheritage.org Willamette Valley Voices: Connecting Generations In This Issue A Journal of Willamette Valley History This edition of Willamette Valley Voices: Connecting Generations is the first of the Willamette Volume 1 Summer 2012 Number 1 Heritage Center’s new biannual publication.
    [Show full text]