Chapter 3: Coastal Characteristics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane
ARCHIVE: Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 By Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane The date of the cyclone refers to the day of landfall or the day of the major impact if it is not a cyclone making landfall from the Coral Sea. The first number after the date is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for that month followed by the three month running mean of the SOI centred on that month. This is followed by information on the equatorial eastern Pacific sea surface temperatures where: W means a warm episode i.e. sea surface temperature (SST) was above normal; C means a cool episode and Av means average SST Date Impact January 1858 From the Sydney Morning Herald 26/2/1866: an article featuring a cruise inside the Barrier Reef describes an expedition’s stay at Green Island near Cairns. “The wind throughout our stay was principally from the south-east, but in January we had two or three hard blows from the N to NW with rain; one gale uprooted some of the trees and wrung the heads off others. The sea also rose one night very high, nearly covering the island, leaving but a small spot of about twenty feet square free of water.” Middle to late Feb A tropical cyclone (TC) brought damaging winds and seas to region between Rockhampton and 1863 Hervey Bay. Houses unroofed in several centres with many trees blown down. Ketch driven onto rocks near Rockhampton. Severe erosion along shores of Hervey Bay with 10 metres lost to sea along a 32 km stretch of the coast. -
Wave Data Recording Program Dunk Island 1998-2002
Wave data recording program Dunk Island 1998–2002 Coastal Services data report No. W2004.2 ISSN 1449–7611 Abstract This report provides summaries of primary analysis of wave data recorded in water depths of approximately 20m relative to lowest astronomical tide, 12.7km north of Dunk Island and 8km northeast of Clump Point in north Queensland. Data was recorded using a Datawell Waverider buoy, and covers the periods from 18 December 1998 to 12 November 2002. The data was divided into seasonal groupings for analysis. No estimations of wave direction data have been provided. This report has been prepared by the EPA’s Coastal Services Unit, Environmental Sciences Division. The EPA acknowledges the following team members who contributed their time and effort to the preparation of this report: John Mohoupt; Vince Cunningham; Gary Hart; Jeff Shortell; Daniel Conwell; Colin Newport; Darren Hanis; Martin Hansen and Jim Waldron. Wave data recording program Dunk Island 1998–2002 Disclaimer While reasonable care and attention have been exercised in the collection, processing and compilation of the wave data included in this report, the Coastal Services Unit does not guarantee the accuracy and reliability of this information in any way. The Environmental Protection Agency accepts no responsibility for the use of this information in any way. Environmental Protection Agency PO Box 155 BRISBANE ALBERT ST QLD 4002. Copyright Copyright Queensland Government 2004. Copyright protects this publication. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report can be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without having prior written permission. -
Evers C Thesis 2005.Pdf (PDF, 10.47MB)
IlARE BOOKS all The University of Sydney Copyright in relation to this thesis. Under the Copyright Act 1968 (several provision of which are referred to below). this thesis must be used only under the normal conditions of scholarly fair dealing for the purposes of research. criticism or review. In particular no results or conclusions should be extracted from it, nor should it be copied or closely paraphrased in whole or in part without the written consent of the author. Proper written acknowledgement should be made for any assistance obtained from this thesis. Under Section 35(2) of the Copyright Act 1968 'the author of a literary, dramatic. musical or artistic work is the owner of any copyright subsisting in the work', By virtue of Section 32( I) copyright 'subsists in an original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work that is unpublished' and of which the author was anAustralian citizen,anAustralian protected person or a person resident inAustralia. The Act, by Section 36( I) provides: 'Subject to this Act, the copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work is infringed by a person who, not being the owner of the copyright and without the licence of the owner of the copyright. does in Australia, or authorises the doing in Australia of, any act comprised in the copyright', Section 31(I )(.)(i) provides that copyright includes the exclusive right to 'reproduce the work in a material form'.Thus.copyright is infringed by a person who, not being the owner of the copyright, reproduces or authorises the reproduction of a work, or of more than a reasonable part of the work, in a material form. -
The Cyclone of 1936: the Most Destructive Storm of the Twentieth Century?
Weather and Climate (2000) 20: 23-28 23 THE CYCLONE OF 1936: THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE STORM OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY? Erick Brenstrum MetService In late January 1936 a weakening tropical of New Zealand on the 31st and intensified cyclone moving towards New Zealand then crossed the North Island on the 2nd of interacted with a cold front over the north February. It was not assigned a name, as the Tasman Sea to form one of the deepest practice of routinely naming tropical cyclones depressions ever to cross the country. The did not begin until 1963. meteorological aspects of the depression were described in a report published by Barnett in FLOODING 1938. He did not describe in detail the destruction caused by the storm, limiting Heavy rain fell over the entire North Island himself to the comment" Graphic descriptions bringing most of the major rivers into flood. of the effects of the storm can be found in the The Mangakahia River in Northland rose 19 daily press for the few days following the 2nd metres at Titoki. Kaitaia main-street was February." flooded a metre deep and one man was The following article is a summary of the drowned there when a house was washed accounts in the newspapers, and shows that away as he was trying to retrieve a friend's this was probably the most destructive storm belongings. Another man was killed near to affect New Zealand during the twentieth Thames in the Coromandel when his hut was century. carried into a flooded stream by a slip. The tropical cyclone formed south of the In Whangerei almost 300 mm of rain fell in Solomon Islands on January 28 then moved 24 hours and floodwater ran through the southeast to pass between New Caledonia and business district tearing up footpaths and Vanuatu. -
Wave Data Recording Program
Wave data recording program Queensland wave climate annual summary for season 2000–01 Coastal Services data report No. 2000.3 ISSN 1449–7611 Foreword This summary of wave climate in Queensland is the earliest of the series of technical wave reports that will be prepared annually by the Coastal Services Unit. It represents a change in the way wave data is presented by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Previously, the wave data recording program technical report series comprised separate reports prepared for each region, covering all data recorded at a site from deployment to date of report. Annual reports will not replace the more comprehensive regional reports. Instead, they will serve to supplement and enhance the reporting ability of the Coastal Services Unit by providing more timely information on wave climates in Queensland. Regional wave data reports will continue to provide the more thorough, long-time presentation of regional conditions. Using the information presented annually, it is hoped that in future, regional reports will be updated every five years. Annual reports will cover the year from 1 November to 31 October. The start of the reporting year therefore coincides with the start of the annual cyclone season that extends from 1 November through to 30 April. This period is also classed as summer in both this annual report and the regional technical reports. The remainder of the year (1 May to 31 October) is classed as winter in these reports. Annual reports present wave information in a similar format to the regional reports, however they also include (for the first time), plots of monthly average significant wave heights and directional wave rose (where possible). -
Wharekawa Coast 2120 Coastal Processes and Hazards
Wharekawa Coast 2120 Coastal Processes and Hazards Draft report prepared for Waikato Regional Council 26 June 2020 Dr Terry M. Hume Note: This draft report has yet to undergo external peer review. It has been provided as a background paper to inform Wharekawa Coast 2120 Community Workshops, Technical Advisory Group, Joint Working Party and Community Advisory Panel activities. 1 Contents Executive summary 3 1. Introduction 7 2. Background 11 3. Coastal setting and hazard drivers 13 3.1 Geomorphology 3.2 Water levels Astronomical tide Storm surge Storm tides Wave runup and setup Rivers 3.3 Long term sea levels 3.4 Currents and circulation 3.5 Winds 3.6 Waves 3.7 Sediment sources and transport 3.8 Shoreline change 3.9 Vertical land movement 3.10 Human influences on coastal processes 3.11 Climate change and sea level rise 4. Coastal hazards 40 4.1 Coastal inundation Historical coastal inundation events Future potential for coastal inundation events Effects of climate change and sea level rise 4.2 Coastal erosion Shoreline change Coastal erosion processes Effects of climate change and sea level rise 4.3 Tsunami Modelling the tsunami threat Effects of climate change and sea level rise 5. Strategies to mitigate coastal hazards and inform adaptive planning 59 5.1 Predicting hazard events 5.2 Coastal inundation 5.3 Coastal erosion 5.4 Tsunami 5.5 Multi-hazard assessment 5.6 Mangroves – a potential means of hazard mitigation? 5.7 Monitoring and predicting forcing processes 5.8 Documenting coastal hazard events 5.9 Input from citizen science 6. -
MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO Diploma Thesis
MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Declaration I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. I agree with the placing of this thesis in the library of the Faculty of Education at the Masaryk University and with the access for academic purposes. Brno, 30th March 2018 …………………………………………. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. for his kind help and constant guidance throughout my work. Bc. Lukáš Opavský OPAVSKÝ, Lukáš. Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis; Diploma Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education, English Language and Literature Department, 2018. XX p. Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Annotation The purpose of this thesis is an analysis of a corpus comprising of opening sentences of articles collected from the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia. Four different quality categories from Wikipedia were chosen, from the total amount of eight, to ensure gathering of a representative sample, for each category there are fifty sentences, the total amount of the sentences altogether is, therefore, two hundred. The sentences will be analysed according to the Firabsian theory of functional sentence perspective in order to discriminate differences both between the quality categories and also within the categories. -
NERMN Beach Profile Monitoring 2011
NERMN beach profi le monitoring 2011 Prepared by Shane Iremonger, Environmental Scientist Bay of Plenty Regional Council Environmental Publication 2011/14 5 Quay Street P O Box 364 Whakatane NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1175 9372 (Print) ISSN: 1179 9471 (Online) Working with our communities for a better environment E mahi ngatahi e pai ake ai te taiao NERMN beach profile monitoring 2011 Publication and Number 2011/14 ISSN: 1175 9372 (Print) 1179 9471 (Online) 11 March 2011 Bay of Plenty Regional Council 5 Quay Street PO Box 364 Whakatane 3158 NEW ZEALAND Prepared by Shane Iremonger, Environmental Scientist Cover Photo: Annabel Beattie undertaking a beach profile using the Emery Pole method, 2010. Acknowledgements The assistance of Annabel Beattie in the compilation of the beach profile data sets is acknowledged, as is the efforts of the whole Environmental Data Services team, in the collection of the beach profile data. The 2011 field photography undertaken by Lauren Schick and Tim Senior is greatly appreciated. The cartography expertise of Trig Yates and the document specialist skills of Rachael Musgrave, in the creation of this document have also been invaluable. Environmental Publication 2011/14 – NERMN beach profile monitoring 2011 i Executive summary This is the third report detailing the results of the coastal monitoring network initiated by Bay of Plenty Regional Council in 1990 as part of its Natural Environment Regional Monitoring Network (NERMN) programme. A total of 53 sites are profiled on an annual basis within the current coastal monitoring programme. Some selected sites are monitored quarterly; others are monitored as necessary, i.e. -
Wave Climate of Fiji
WAVE CLIMATE OF FIJI Stephen F. Barstow and Ola Haug OCEANOR’ November 1994 SOPAC Technical Report 205 ’ OCEANOR Oceanographic Company of Norway AS Pir-Senteret N-7005 Trondheim Norway The Wave Climate of Fiji Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 2 2. SOME BASICS ....................................................................................................... 3 3 . OCEANIC WINDS ................................................................................................... 4 3.1 General Description ............................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Winds in the source region for swell ..................................................................................... 5 4 . OCEAN WAVES ..................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Buoy Measurements .............................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Ocean Wave Statistics .......................................................................................................... 9 5 . SPECIAL EVENTS................................................................................................ 15 5.1 Cyclone Joni, December 1992............................................................................................. 15 5.2 Cyclone Raja, December 1986........................................................................................... -
Coastal Hazards of the Bay of Plenty
FIELDTRIP 5 COASTAL HAZARDS OF THE BAY OF PLENTY Willem de Lange University of Waikato [email protected] 37 INTRODUCTION This field trip will examine the advances in our understanding of coastal processes and hazards in the context of coastal development in the Bay of Plenty. If time permits, we will visit Bryans Beach, Ohiwa Spit, Ohope Spit, Thornton, Matata, Maketu, Papamoa, Omanu and Mount Maunganui. COASTAL HAZARD ZONES Bruun (1964) defined a development setback line as “an established survey line indicating the limits for certain types of developments” for the purposes of dealing with coastal erosion in Florida. This setback was determined by combining technical, developmental and administrative aspects relating to specific sites. Gibb (1981) subsequently introduced the concept of a coastal hazard zone (CHZ), where a CHZ was defined as “an adequate width of land between any development and the beach”. In practice, the first Coastal Hazard Zones (CHZs) in New Zealand corresponded to the 1 chain (~20 m) zone of riparian rights (Queen's Chain) that extended landward of the mean high water mark. However, it became clear that this distance was insufficient to provide adequate protection from large storms. After examining the maximum shoreline retreat caused by individual storms, in 1972 the Ministry of Works and Development recommended a standard CHZ of 60 m for the whole New Zealand coast (Stuart, 1984). For some problem areas the application of a standard 60 m CHZ did not provide sufficient protection. Instead, it was necessary to develop CHZs that were site specific and involved greater widths of the coastal land. -
LCA Solomon Islands 2011.Pdf
LCA – Solomon Islands Version 1.07,5 Logistics Capacity Assessment Solomon Islands Country Name Solomon Islands Official Name Solomon Islands Assessment Assessment Dates: From February 2011 To March 2011 Name of Assessor Anna Young Title & Position Logistics Officer Email contact [email protected] 1/66 LCA – Solomon Islands Version 1.07,5 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Country Profile ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Introduction & Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.2. Humanitarian Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................................... 9 2.4. Customs Information ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 3. Logistics Infrastructure ..................................................................................................................................................................... -
11900396 01.Pdf
目 次 目 次 地 図 略語一覧 第1章 調査団派遣の概要 ··················································································································· 1 1-1 調査の背景・経緯 ··············································································································· 1 1-2 調査目的······························································································································· 1 1-3 調査方法······························································································································· 1 1-4 調査対象国··························································································································· 2 1-5 調査期間······························································································································· 2 1-6 調査団構成··························································································································· 2 1-7 調査行程······························································································································· 2 第2章 調査結果の概要 ······················································································································· 7 2-1 大洋州の災害の現状 ··········································································································· 7 2-1-1 フィジーにおける災害の現状 ················································································ 9 2-1-2 バヌアツにおける災害の現状 ················································································ 13