Subject Index
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Directorate of Civil Defence Police Department
Directorate of Civil Defence Police Department NOTE ON HOME GUARDS & CIVIL DEFENCE Formation of the Home Guards in the state: In the wake of Chinese aggression in October 1962 and as per Tamil Nadu Home Guards Rules 1963 the HGs organization has come into being in Tamilnadu. 2. Strength: As on date there are 105 ½ companies of HGs (80.5 men companies and 25 women companies viz.,) totalling 11,622 Home guards including 2750 women Home guards. All the districts and all the Police Commissionerates are having Home guards units including women HG wing. 3. Organisational set up: The Home Guards organization is basically voluntary in character and all the Home guard personnel being civilians are volunteers. i) Central level: At the central level the Director General, National Emergency Response Force & Civil Defence is responsible for all policy matters concerning rising, training and equipping of Home guards in the country. He is assisted by a Dy.Director General, HGs, an Asst.Dir.Genl. Home guards, a senior staff officer, Home Guards and a junior staff officer together with the secretariat staff. ii) State level: The following is the state level set up of Home guards organisation: a) Director Genl.of Police : Commandant Genl. of Home Guards b) I.G.P : Dy.CMT Genl. Home guards c) District SPs / COPs : Commandants, Home Guards of their respective district / city unit. d) Asst.CMTs General : Civilians (There are six A.C.Gs in Tamilnadu - ACGs South zone @ Tiruppur, Villupuram range & Cuddlore, Vellore range & Vellore, Chennai city @ Chennai, Tirunelveli range @ Tirunelveli and Ooty and Trichy range at Trichy. -
Oxford Book Fair List 2014
BERNARD QUARITCH LTD OXFORD BOOK FAIR LIST including NEW ACQUISITIONS ● APRIL 2014 Main Hall, Oxford Brookes University (Headington Hill Campus) Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP Stand 87 Saturday 26th April 12 noon – 6pm - & - Sunday 27th April 10am – 4pm A MEMOIR OF JOHN ADAM, PRESENTED TO THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER LORD GRENVILLE BY WILLIAM ADAM 1. [ADAM, William (editor).] Description and Representation of the Mural Monument, Erected in the Cathedral of Calcutta, by General Subscription, to the Memory of John Adam, Designed and Executed by Richard Westmacott, R.A. [?Edinburgh, ?William Adam, circa 1830]. 4to (262 x 203mm), pp. [4 (blank ll.)], [1]-2 (‘Address of the British Inhabitants of Calcutta, to John Adam, on his Embarking for England in March 1825’), [2 (contents, verso blank)], [2 (blank l.)], [2 (title, verso blank)], [1]-2 (‘Description of the Monument’), [2 (‘Inscription on the Base of the Tomb’, verso blank)], [2 (‘Translation of Claudian’)], [1 (‘Extract of a Letter from … Reginald Heber … to … Charles Williams Wynn’)], [2 (‘Extract from a Sermon of Bishop Heber, Preached at Calcutta on Christmas Day, 1825’)], [1 (blank)]; mounted engraved plate on india by J. Horsburgh after Westmacott, retaining tissue guard; some light spotting, a little heavier on plate; contemporary straight-grained [?Scottish] black morocco [?for Adam for presentation], endpapers watermarked 1829, boards with broad borders of palmette and flower-and-thistle rolls, upper board lettered in blind ‘Monument to John Adam Erected at Calcutta 1827’, turn-ins roll-tooled in blind, mustard-yellow endpapers, all edges gilt; slightly rubbed and scuffed, otherwise very good; provenance: William Wyndham Grenville, Baron Grenville, 3 March 1830 (1759-1834, autograph presentation inscription from William Adam on preliminary blank and tipped-in autograph letter signed from Adam to Grenville, Edinburgh, 6 March 1830, 3pp on a bifolium, addressed on final page). -
S. of Shri Mali Chikkapapanna; B. June 5, 1937; M. Shrimati Kenchamma, 1 D.; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-4-1980 to 2-4-1986
M MADDANNA, SHRI M. : Studied upto B.A.; Congress (I) (Karnataka); s. of Shri Mali Chikkapapanna; b. June 5, 1937; m. Shrimati Kenchamma, 1 d.; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-4-1980 to 2-4-1986. Per. Add. : 5, III Cross, Annayappa Block, Kumara Park West, Bangalore (Karnataka). MADHAVAN, SHRI K. K. : B.A., LL.B.; Congress (U) (Kerala); s. of Shri Kunhan; b. July 23, 1917; m. Shrimati Devi, 1 s. and 1 d.; Member, (i) Kerala Legislative Assembly, 1965 and (ii) Rajya Sabha, 3-4-1976 to 2-4-1982; Died. Obit. on 21-10-1999. MADHAVAN, SHRI S. : B.Com., B.L.; A.I.A.D.M.K. (Tamil Nadu); s .of Shri Selliah Pillai; b . October 3, 1933; m. Shrimati Dhanalakshmi, 1 s. and 2 d.; Member, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, 1962-76 and 1984-87; Minister, Government of Tamil Nadu, 1967-76; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-4-1990 to 2-4- 1996. Per. Add. : 17, Sixth Main Road, Raja Annamalai Puram, Madras (Tamil Nadu). MADNI, SHRI MAULANA ASAD : Fazil (equivalent to M.A. in Islamic Theology); Congress (I) (Uttar Pradesh); s. of Maulana Hussain Ahmad Madni; b. 1928; m. Shrimati Barirah Bano, 4 s. and 2 d.; Vice-President, U.P.C.C.; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-4-1968 to 2-4-1974, 5-7-1980 to 4-7-1986 and 3-4-1988 to 2-4-1994. Per. Add . : Madani Manzil , Deoband , District Saharanpur (Uttar Pradesh). MAHABIR PRASAD, DR. : M.A., Ph.D.; Janata Party (Bihar); s. of Shri Sahdev Yadav; b. 1939; m. Shrimati Chandra Kala Devi, 2 s. -
Disaster Management of India
DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN INDIA DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2011 This book has been prepared under the GoI-UNDP Disaster Risk Reduction Programme (2009-2012) DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN INDIA Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India c Disaster Management in India e ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The perception about disaster and its management has undergone a change following the enactment of the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The definition of disaster is now all encompassing, which includes not only the events emanating from natural and man-made causes, but even those events which are caused by accident or negligence. There was a long felt need to capture information about all such events occurring across the sectors and efforts made to mitigate them in the country and to collate them at one place in a global perspective. This book has been an effort towards realising this thought. This book in the present format is the outcome of the in-house compilation and analysis of information relating to disasters and their management gathered from different sources (domestic as well as the UN and other such agencies). All the three Directors in the Disaster Management Division, namely Shri J.P. Misra, Shri Dev Kumar and Shri Sanjay Agarwal have contributed inputs to this Book relating to their sectors. Support extended by Prof. Santosh Kumar, Shri R.K. Mall, former faculty and Shri Arun Sahdeo from NIDM have been very valuable in preparing an overview of the book. This book would have been impossible without the active support, suggestions and inputs of Dr. J. Radhakrishnan, Assistant Country Director (DM Unit), UNDP, New Delhi and the members of the UNDP Disaster Management Team including Shri Arvind Sinha, Consultant, UNDP. -
1 Introduction
Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p. -
Operation Greif and the Trial of the “Most Dangerous Man in Europe.”
Operation Greif and the Trial of the “Most Dangerous Man in Europe.” A disheveled George S. Patton reported to Dwight Eisenhower with unsettling news from the front. “Ike, I’ve never seen such a goddamn foul-up! The Krauts are infiltrating behind our lines, raising hell, cutting wires and turning around road signs!”1 Such was the characteristic response in the aftermath of Operation Greif, orchestrated by Germany’s top commando, Otto Skorzeny. Through his actions during the Ardennes Offensive of 1944, and his acquittal while on trial, Skorzeny effectively utilized disinformation and covert operations to both earn his credibility and infamous reputation. Born in Vienna in 1908, Skorzeny led a mundane life during the years of the First World War. Despite his inability to concentrate on his studies, he managed to graduate in 1931 from the Technischen Hochschule in Wien with an engineering degree.2 His participation in the Schlagende Verbindungen (dueling societies) during his academic career gave Skorzeny the reputation of being a fierce fighter and resulted in his characteristic scars that covered both sides of his face. With the unification of Austria into Germany in 1938, Skorzeny had his first contact with the Nazi party. While visiting Vienna, he came upon Austrian President Miklas in the midst of an attempt on his life by Nazi roughnecks. Skorzeny, always a man of action, blocked the way of the would-be assassins and ended the confrontation. Word spread across the Germany of the bold Austrian who had saved the President’s life on a whim. 1 Glenn B Infield, Skorzeny (New York: St. -
Atrocities During World War II
Atrocities during World War II Purpose: To expose students to the truth of the utter brutality of atrocities during wartime and discuss/analyze the possible reasons that seemingly “civilized” nations produce individuals capable of horrific deeds. Students have spent considerable time in earlier grades addressing the tragedy of the Holocaust and will now see that this war had brutality beyond this experience. This lesson is a part of a two-week unit covering the Second World War. Grade level: 10th grade United States History but also appropriate in Global History. Topic: Comparing Japanese Imperial Army atrocities with other WWII atrocities. Time: To be completed in one to two 47 minute periods. Materials: Additional readings addressing Japanese and German atrocities (attached). Selections from: Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility by Herbert C Kelman Flyboys by James Bradford Skills: Students acquire basis knowledge and are placed in a position of critical analysis of actions by so-called civilized nations. Procedures: Class is divided roughly in half with one group given copies of attached readings regarding Japanese atrocities and half given readings regarding German atrocities as homework from the previous class. Students will share some of the details of their readings. Subsequent student-led discussion will focus on answering the following prompts: ¾ Is there an explanation for actions by combatants? ¾ What leads modern states to be involved in these activities? (Share insights from Flyboys -
No.26 Police-R.R..Pmd
VOL. LIV. No. 26, WEDNESDAY, 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2020 / 1st ASVINA, 1941 (SAKA) ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Kavaratti Island, Dated : 16-09-2020 NOTIFICATION F.No. 1/3 /2011-Estt (Pol) :- In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to the Article 309 of the Constitution of India, read with the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs Notification No. 2/7/63-LMA dated 4-2-1963, the Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep hereby makes the following rules to amend the Group C posts in the Lakshadweep Police Department in supersession of Recruitment Rules to various posts in the Lakshadweep Police Department issued vide MHA Notification No. 71/4(33)/61-ANL dated 21-11-61, Administrator’s Notification No. 6/105/69-Genl. dated 4-03-70, No. 1/10/73-Estt (Pol) dated 12-04-73 and 12-07-74, No.4/13/75-Pol dated 13-10-77, Administrator’s Notification No. 1/15/77-Estt (Pol) dated 11-12-79, Administrator’s Notification No. 1/1/86-Estt (Pol) dated 21-11-86, Administrator’s Notification F.No. 1/1/86-Estt (Pol) dated 30-06-1995, 25-03-2000, Notification F.No. 1/9/2001-Estt (Pol) Parti.I dated 3-12-2009, Notification F.No. 1/3/2011-Estt (Pol) dated 19-04-2011, Administrator’s Notification F.No. 1/6/2008-Estt (Pol) Vol. II dated 11-11-2008. Administrator’s Notification F.No. 1/10/87-Estt (Pol) dated 25-01-1998, Administrator’s Notification F.No. -
A2 Revision Guide British Empire 1914-1967 India
A2 Revision Guide British Empire 1914-1967 India 1906 All Muslim League founded- originally cooperated with Congress 1909 expressed belief in home rule, ‘Hind Swaraj’- favoured peaceful resistance based on satyagraha- insistence on the truth- rejecting violence to combat evil- appeal to moral conscience through strikes (hartals) and swadeshi (boycotts) Gandhi rejected caste system particularly against untouchables Wanted independent India- remain agricultural and rural and reject western industrialisation/ urbanisation Offered benefits of Western democracy/ liberalism whilst keeping Indian tradition. Non-violent methods were difficult for British- hit them economically and they couldn’t use violent oppression as it seemed disproportionate to methods used. Gandhi began career in S. Africa- campaigned against racism and segregation and challenged GB and Afrikaners from 1910 (dominant group after unification- descendants of Boers) 1913 Muhammad Ali Jinnah takes over Muslim League- originally favoured Hindu- Muslim co-op Approx. 1/3 of troops in Fr. In 1914 were Indian or GB soldiers who had served in India. Indian troops- major contributions to fight Middle East, and Africa (record less successful than Dominions). 1914 2/3 India’s imports came from GB but this began to fall- wartime disruption. India as capture domestic market more. After war desperate for £ to help control against nationalists GB put high taxes on Indian imports- 1917 11% to 1931 25%- protected Indian industry against competitors so there was growth. 1915 Gandhi returned to India, became President of Indian National Congress GB imports from India reduced from 7.3% to 6.1% 1925-29 but rose to 6.5% 1934-8. GB exports to India also reduced 11.9% 1909-13 to 8% 1934-8. -
High Command Case: a Study in Staff and Command Responsibility
JOHN JAY DOUGLASS* Colonel, JAGC High Command Case: A Study in Staff and Command Responsibility Less than twenty-five years after the conclusion of the major World War I1war crimes trials, international jurists, historians and the general public are not clear as to, nor are they apparently concerned with, the authority, procedure or even the significant legal decisions of the war crimes trials held both in Europe and the Far East following World War 11.1 Even a mere twenty-five years of experience indicates there will be other trials of those accused of criminal acts in war. Such trials, as well as international lawmakers, should well review the German High Command Trial before the United States Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in October 1948. The lessons of this trial may well be the most important of those from any of the trials held following World War 11. The thrust of this trial and its results relate to the authority of command- ers of military forces for actions of their troops and their personal respon- sibility, as well as the responsibility of staff officers in senior staff positions, for'actions taken by them or carried on under their direction. As a result of recent developments within the United States, arising from the war in Vietnam, it is worthwhile to review the German High Command Trial and to analyze its relationship to the present state of the law. The legal question of criminal responsibility of military commanders and staff officers who do *Commandant (Dean), The Judge Advocate General's School, U.S. -
NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin -
Opening Statement Transcript.Pdf
Court 5, Case 7 15 July 47 -M1-1-ABG-Perrin (Schaefer) Official Transcript of the American Military Tribunal in the matter of the United States of America, against Wilhelm List, et al., Defendants, sitting at Nurnberg[sic], Germany, on 15 July 1947, 0930-1630, Justice Wennerstrum, presiding. THE MARSHAL: The Honorable, the Judges of Military Tribunal 5. Military Tribunal 5 is now in session. God save the United States of America and this honorable Tribunal. THE PRESIDENT: This Tribunal is convened at this time for the purpose of the presentation of the opening statements on behalf of the prosecution. Prior to the presentation of this opening statement, I wish to make a statement relative to certain motions which have been filed by the defense counsel. These motions will receive the consideration of this Tribunal following the presentation of the opening statements by the prosecution. Is the prosecution ready? GENERAL TAYLOR: Yes, Your Honor. THE PRESIDENT: You may proceed. GENERAL TAYLOR: May it please Your Honors. This is the first time, since the conclusion of the trial before the International Military Tribunal, that high-ranking officers of the Wehrmacht have appeared in this dock, charged with capital crimes committed in a strictly military capacity. The conviction and execution of Keitel and Jodl, pursuant to the judgement and sentence of the International Military Tribunal, gave rise to wide-spread public comment, not only in Germany, but also in the United States and England. Since that time, there have been several other note-worthy trials of German military leaders. In the British zone of occupation, Generals von Falkenhorst and Blumentritt have been tried for the murder of prisoners of war.