DOCSLIB.ORG

Women's Rights and Gender Equality - Femm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women's Rights and Gender Equality - Femm LEGISLATIVE TRAIN 08.2021 19 WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY - FEMM GENDER BALANCE ON BOARDS [ ON HOLD ] CONTENT To address the considerable imbalance between women and men in economic decision-making at the highest level, the European Commission submitted a proposal for a directive on gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges in November 2012. The directive would be based on Article 157(3) TFEU, which ensures the application of the principle of gender equality in employment and occupation. Article 157(4) TFEU and Article 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU recognise positive action as a method of achieving gender equality. The proposal set the aim of a minimum of 40% of non-executive members of the under- represented sex on company boards, to be achieved by 2020 in the private sector and by 2018 in public-sector companies. Companies would have to make appointments on the basis of pre-established, clear and neutral criteria. If candidates were equally qualified, advantage would be given to the under-represented sex. Member States would require companies to issue annual reports on the composition of their boards and impose sanctions in the event of negative evaluations. The directive would not apply to SMEs. Companies that had not reached the 40 % target would be required to continue to apply the procedural rules, as well as to explain what measures they intended to take reach it. For Member States that chose to apply the objective to both executive and non- executive directors, a lower target (33 %) would apply. The file was included in the list of unfinished business carried over to the current Commission (2020-2024). The Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, stated in her Political Guidelines that she will seek to build a majority to unblock the Directive. It is one of the priorities in the European Commission's new EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025 (see the related legislative train carriage). The European Parliament adopted its position, by a substantial majority, on 20 November 2013 (rapporteurs: Rodi KRATSA- TSAGAROPOULOU (EPP, Greece) for the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM) and Evelyn REGNER (S&D, Austria) for the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)). The Parliament strongly supported legislative action in this area and, notably: • backed the key objective for listed companies in the EU to aim to reach a target of at least 40 % of non-executive directors of the under-represented sex by 1 January 2020 at the latest (and by 2018 for public companies); • went beyond the Commission’s proposal, by calling for additional measures. These included: stronger penalties, such as exclusion from public tenders, for companies which failed to introduce transparent appointment procedures; the removal of 1/4 exemptions for companies employing less than 10 % of the under-represented sex; the extension of reporting to the EU’s own institutions and agencies; and an examination of whether the scope of the directive should be extended to cover non-listed public companies; • pointed out that, although the directive would not apply to SMEs or micro-enterprises, Member States should support these companies and give them incentives to improve gender balance at all levels of management and on their boards; • stressed that, to achieve gender equality in the workplace, companies should develop a gender-balanced model of decision- making at all levels, whilst taking steps to eliminate the gender pay gap and introducing flexible working conditions for all employees. Since adopting its original position, Parliament has continued to push for progress. It sees swift adoption of the women on boards directive as an important first step towards equal representation in the public and private sectors and has also noted that progress has been most tangible in Member States in which binding legislation on quotas for boards has been adopted. During its current term, Parliament's resolution of 21 January 2021 on the new EU Gender Equality Strategy called on the Commission to continue working with the Member States and EU presidencies to urgently break the deadlock in the Council and adopt the proposed Directive. Parliament's JURI and FEMM committees held a joint hearing on women on boards on 21 September 2020 and a debate on the state of play was held during the plenary session in October 2020. Despite broad consensus across the EU in favour of taking measures to improve the gender balance on company boards, not all Member States support EU-wide legislation and some Member States consider that binding measures at the EU level are not the best way to pursue the objective. The national parliaments of Denmark, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and one of the two chambers of the Parliament of the Czech Republic (Chamber of Deputies) submitted reasoned opinions within eight weeks from the submission of the Commission’s proposal, alleging that it did not comply with the principle of subsidiarity. Some delegations continue to prefer national measures or non-binding measures at EU level. As well as revising the proposed target dates and reporting deadlines, successive Presidencies of the Council of the European Union have drafted compromise texts with a view to breaking the deadlock on the directive, but agreement has not yet emerged. The Commission Vice-President, Věra Jourová, reported on the state of play in the Council at a meeting of Parliament's JURI committee on 25 May 2020, noting that 18 Member States then supported the proposal and that support from Germany would be enough to allow Council to reach a qualified majority vote to secure a common approach. It was also reported that 8 EU Member States (Denmark, Greece, Croatia, Hungary, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and Slovakia) continue to oppose the proposal, some because they already have legislation in place. In October 2020, EU ministers of employment and social affairs held a debate on gender equality in the labour market, at which some participants called on the presidency and member states to finally move forward with the directive. The German, Portuguese and Slovenian presidencies together called for decisive progress in the negotiations on the proposal. The European Economic and Social Committee has also asked the Council to continue the discussion on the Women on Boards Directive. References: LEGISLATIVE TRAIN 08.2021 19 WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY - FEMM 2/4 • European Commission, Proposal for a Directive on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures, COM/2012/0614 final - 2012/0299(COD) • Eur-Lex, Discussions in Council and other bodies • European Parliament, Legislative resolution of 20 November 2013 on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges, 2012/0299(COD) • European Parliament, Resolution of 21 January 2021 on the EU Strategy for Gender Equality, (2019/2169(INI)) • European Parliament, Joint JURI-FEMM hearing “Women on Boards”, 21 September 2020 • European Parliament, Council and Commission, Debate on gender balance on company boards, plenary session, October 2020 • Council, Trio presidency declaration on gender equality, July 2020 • European Economic and Social Committee, Opinion of 15 May 2019 on gender equality, SOC/610 Further reading: • Evelyn Regner, Gender Balance on Boards: High time for gender equality, The Parliament magazine, 16 June 2021 • European Institute for Gender Equality, Statistical brief: gender balance in corporate boards 2020, 17 May 2021 • Thodoris Chondrogiannos, Nikolas Leontopoulos, Paulo Pena and Harald Schumann, Greece has been blocking an EU law promoting gender balance – is this about to change?, Investigate Europe, 21 April 2021 • European Parliament, EPRS, Gender balance on company boards, At a glance, November 2015 For a more extensive list of Parliament positions, references and further reading, please see the earlier versions. Related legislative train carriages • EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025 Author: Rosamund Shreeves, Ülla Jurviste, Members' Research Service, [email protected] Read more on the Parliaments' fight for gender equality in the EU As of 15 August 2021. RAPPORTEUR RAPPORTEUR Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Evelyn REGNER ECON - FEMM ECON - FEMM LEGISLATIVE TRAIN 08.2021 19 WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY - FEMM 3/4 RAPPORTEUR RAPPORTEUR Dubravka ŠUICA Ernest URTASUN AFET ECON - FEMM HYPERLINK REFERENCES • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52012PC0614 • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/HIS/?uri=CELEX:52012PC0614&qid=1516284060247 • http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0488 • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0025_EN.html • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/joint-juri-femm-hearing-women-on-boards-/product- details/20200915CHE07481 • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/agenda/briefing/2020-10-05/11/stop-stalling-the-women-on-boards-directive- meps-tell-eu-countries • https://www.bmfsfj.de/blob/158154/252af172d6d4b456d05743156db36a36/20200706-trio-declaration-data.pdf • https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/gender-equality-issues-own-initiative- opinion • https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/high-time-for-gender-quality • https://eige.europa.eu/publications/statistical-brief-gender-balance-corporate-boards-2020 • https://www.investigate-europe.eu/en/2021/greece-has-been-blocking-an-eu-law-promoting-gender-balance-is-this-about-to- change/ • http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2015/572801/EPRS_ATA(2015)572801_EN.pdf • mailto:[email protected] • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/priorities/social/20190712STO56961/the-parliament-s-fight-for-gender- equality-in-the-eu LEGISLATIVE TRAIN 08.2021 19 WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY - FEMM 4/4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paradise Papers Letter
    Paradise Papers Letter: Dear Sirs, We, the undersigned parliamentarians, are deeply concerned by recent revelations from the 'Paradise Papers' investigation. We regret that some governments, not least the British government, have failed to learn the lessons from the previous 'LuxLeaks' and 'Panama Papers' scandals. In particular, we are concerned that insufficient progress has been made to ensure that investment vehicles like trusts are sufficiently transparent. We are also concerned that tax havens, like those involved in the Paradise Papers, have been able to continue with highly opaque company and trust registration models. It has also been disappointing to see some countries try to block measures against tax havens like the EU's blacklist of tax havens. We call together for all governments to place renewed emphasis on tax transparency and fully implement Public Country-by-Country Reporting. In particular, we call for information on trusts to be made publicly available, and for all tax havens to be forced to automatically share information with international tax authorities. We also call for stronger regulation of intermediaries, including penalties for those proven to be involved in tax evasion, aggressive tax avoidance or money laundering. Failure to act against aggressive tax avoidance and evasion is depriving public services of desperately-needed funding. It also enables some multinational companies to unfairly undercut many small and medium-sized businesses. The Paradise Papers must act as a wake-up call to deal with industrial-scale
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Europe on the Internet
    Information Guide Europe on the Internet A selection of useful websites, databases and documents for information on the European Union and the wider Europe Ian Thomson Director, Cardiff EDC Latest revision: August 2017 © Cardiff EDC Europe on the Internet Contents • Searching for European information • Legislative, judicial and policy-making information • Keeping up-to-date • Information on EU policies and countries • Grants and loans – Statistics • Contact information • Terminological, linguistic and translation information In addition to textual hyperlinks throughout this guide, many of the images are also hyperlinks to further information Europe on the Internet. © Ian Thomson, Cardiff EDC, August 2017 Europe on the Internet Searching for European Information Europe on the Internet. © Ian Thomson, Cardiff EDC, August 2017 Searching for European information The EU’s own search engine to find information from EU Institutions & Agencies published on EUROPA, the EU’s portal [EUROPA Search does not find information in EUR-Lex] The European Journalism Centre set up this Search Europa service, which uses the functionality of Google to search the EUROPA portal [Includes results from EUR-Lex] FIND-eR (Find Electronic Resources) will help you find EU publications, academic books, journal articles, etc. on topics of interest to the EU [Offers hyperlinks to full text of sources if freely available, or via use of a Link-Resolver] [Formerly known as ECLAS] EU Law and Publications: Use the Search Centre to search for EU documents [EU law – EUR-Lex] and EU publications [EU Bookshop] + EU websites and Summaries of EU Legislation EU Bookshop: from here you can buy printed copies or freely download electronic copies of EU publications.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Title First Name Last Name Austria Frau Evelyn Regner
    Country Title First name Last name Austria Frau Evelyn Regner Bulgaria G-n Angel Dzhambazki Bulgaria G-n Emil Radev Czech Republic Pan Jiří Maštálka Czech Republic Pan Pavel Svoboda Denmark Mr Jens Rohde Finland Rva Heidi Hautala France Mme Joëlle Bergeron France Mme Marie-Christine Boutonnet France M. Jean-Marie Cavada France M. Pascal Durand France Mme Constance Le Grip France M. Gilles Lebreton France Mme Virginie Rozière Germany Frau Evelyne Gebhardt Germany Frau Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann Germany Frau Angelika Niebler Germany Frau Julia Reda Germany Herr Axel Voss Germany Herr Rainer Wieland Germany Mr Tiemo Wölken Greece Kirios Konstantinos Chrysogonos Hungary Úr József Szájer Ireland Mr Brian Crowley Italy Ms Isabella Adinolfi Italy Sig. Mario Borghezio Italy Sig. Sergio Cofferati Italy Sig.ra Laura Ferrara Italy Mr Enrico Gasbarra Italy Mr Stefano Maullu Lithuania Mr Antanas Guoga Lithuania Ponas Viktor Uspaskich Luxembourg Mme Mady Delvaux Poland Pani Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg Poland Mr Kosma Złotowski Poland Pan Stanisław Jozef Żółtek Poland Pan Tadeusz Zwiefka Portugal Sr Antonio Marinho E Pinto Romania Dl Daniel Buda Spain Sr Luis de Grandes Pascual Spain Sra Rosa Estaràs Ferragut Sweden Herr Max Andersson Sweden Fru Jytte Guteland United Kingdom Ms Jane Collins United Kingdom Ms Mary Honeyball United Kingdom Mr Sajjad Karim Email Political group [email protected] S&D [email protected] ECR [email protected] EPP [email protected] GUE/NGL [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • TTIP-Letter-To-Schul
    Mr. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament European Parliament Bât. Paul-Henri Spaak, 09B011 60, rue Wiertz B-1047 Bruxelles 7 July 2016 Dear Mr. Schulz, In anticipation of the 14th round of negotiations between the EU and US for the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) planned to start on 11 July in Brussels, we are writing to you on behalf of over 65 organisations representing consumers, farmers, not-for-profit health insurers, environmental and general public interest groups to express our serious concerns that the European Commission is failing to respect the European Parliament’s 2015 Resolution on TTIP. 1 Today, we released new analysis, which demonstrates that the European Commission continues to ignore critical aspects of the European Parliament’s Resolution on TTIP, in particular regarding recommendations related to protecting public health, the environment, and democracy. 1. Negotiating on and affecting EU chemicals and pesticides rules The European Parliament has called on the European Commission not to negotiate on issues “where the EU and the US have very different rules” and not to allow regulatory cooperation to affect future standards in such areas. However, the European Commission has continued to negotiate on issues that will affect legislation on chemicals, pesticides, and cosmetic products, whether directly or through regulatory cooperation. This is particularly worrying because the European Commission is already lowering current EU standards of protection (such as on limits to pesticide residues in food) in order to remove barriers to trade. 2. Respect for the EU regulatory system The European Parliament has called on the European Commission “to fully respect the established regulatory systems on both sides of the Atlantic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-001742/2021 to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Rule 138 Brando Benifei (S&D), Patrizia Toia (S&D), Giuliano Pisapia (S&D), Bettina Vollath (S&D), Margarida Marques (S&D), Evelyn Regner (S&D), Andreas Schieder (S&D), Domènec Ruiz Devesa (S&D), Milan Brglez (S&D), Pierfrancesco Majorino (S&D), Petar Vitanov (S&D) Subject: The detention of Ahmed Samir Abdelhay Ali in Egypt Ahmed Samir Abdelhay Ali, a student at the Central European University in Austria, has been arbitrarily detained in Cairo, Egypt by the Egyptian Security Forces since 1 February 2021, after he returned to Egypt to spend the holidays with his family. Mr Samir, a researcher into the history of family planning in Egypt and an advocate of safe and legal access to healthcare and women’s reproductive rights, has been charged by the Supreme State Security Prosecution with joining and funding a terrorist organisation and deliberately spreading false news. Mr Samir is currently being held in solitary confinement and is being denied contact with his family and lawyers, access to warm clothing and acceptable living conditions. He has testified to being a victim of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment by national security forces. His case is reminiscent of those of Patrick George Zaki, Walid al-Shobaki and Giulio Regeni. 1. Is the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy aware of this latest worrying case? 2. Will he raise this issue with the Egyptian authorities as a matter of urgency and call for Mr Samir’s immediate release and for the withdrawal of all charges against him? PE691.730v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Elections Gearing up for a "New" India?
    INDIAN ELECTIONS GEARING UP FOR A "NEW" INDIA? Summer 2014 In association with Media partner INDIAN ELECTIONS GEARING UP FOR A "NEW" INDIA? Report of the policy insight organised by Friends of Europe in association with European Indian Chamber of Commerce (EICC) with media partner Europe’s World Summer 2014 Brussels This report reflects the rapporteur’s understanding of the views expressed by participants. Moreover, these views are not necessarily those of the Table of contents organisations that participants represent, nor of Friends of Europe, its Board of Trustees, members or partners. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, provided that full credit is POLICY INSIGHT given to Friends of Europe and that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in part, is not sold unless incorporated in other works. Indian elections: Gearing up for a "new" India? 7 Great expectations: Hopes and challenges of Narendra Modi's mandate 7 EU-India strategic partnership: After looking East, will Modi also turns West? 11 Is there still space for an opposition? 15 ANNEX I - Programme 17 Rapporteur: Emanuela Mangiarotti ANNEX II - List of participants 19 Publisher: Geert Cami Director: Nathalie Furrer Programme Manager: Patricia Diaz Photographer, Design & Layout: Cristina Frauca © Friends of Europe, Summer 2014 Indian elections: Gearing up for a "new" India? | Summer 2014 7 POLICY INSIGHT Indian elections: Gearing up for a "new" India? Indian voters have given a resounding mandate for reform and change to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sparking high expectations of a “new” and more dynamic India. Yet, a number of challenges confront “Team Modi”, including growing demands for an end to corruption, measures to tackle the scourge of poverty, create new jobs and play a more decisive international role.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review Eu 2011
    ANNUAL REVIEW EU 2011 Policy Works! WWF in Brussels 2011 WWF European Policy Offi ce - Annual Review 2011 | page 1 CONTENTS NGO OF THE YEAR 3 FOREWORD 4 THE EUROPEAN UNION AND WWF IN 2011 5 FROM ECONOMIC CRISIS TO GREEN ECONOMY 8 PUBLIC AFFAIRS AT ALL STAGES OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS 10 OUR MAIN ACTIONS IN 2011 13 COMMUNICATION 19 OUR DONORS, PARTNERS AND ALLIES 20 FINANCIALS 21 OUR CHALLENGES FOR 2012 23 WWF-EPO STAFF 24 WWF IN EUROPE 26 Authors: Hans Wolters and Hanneke de Bode, www.organisationdevelopmentsupport.eu Layout: Lies Verheyen / Mazout.nu Printed on 100% recycled paper Front cover: © Franky De Meyer Published in March 2012 by WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature (Formerly World Wildlife Fund), Brussels, Belgium. Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. © Text 2012 WWF. All rights reserved. WWF European Policy Office - Annual Review 2011 | page 2 © FABRICE DEBATTY © FABRICE WWF EUROPEAN POLICY OFFICE IS NGO OF THE YEAR 2011 In 2011, the WWF European Policy Office (EPO) received a prestigious prize from the publisher of The Parliament magazine, the Dods Public Affairs award for NGO of the Year. This is the second time in four years that the team of WWF lobbyists and communications professionals in the centre of European policy making has collected this award. It is recognition not only of the skill and effectiveness of the Brussels team but a testament also to the strength of the WWF network – WWF International and WWF National Organisations – working together in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena Dalli, European Commissioner for Equality
    Members of the European Parliament’s Intergroup on LGBTI Rights Intergroup on Children’s Rights To: Helena Dalli, European Commissioner for Equality Brussels, 20 March 2020 Subject: Protection of rainbow families and their children as regards their freedom of movement Honorable Commissioner, Freedom of movement is a fundamental right and needs to be guaranteed for all EU citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Especially children in rainbow families must be fully protected from a situation of legal uncertainty and emotional limbo created by the interpretation and application of uneven rules across the European Union. EU citizens and their family members have the right to move freely and live in another EU country1. This very same right is appallingly denied to rainbow families and their children in some member states, where national and local authorities refuse to recognise their family status – as this has already legally been established in another EU Member State – and deprive them of their fundamental rights which they derive from EU law. This legal patchwork creates a situation in which same-sex spouses and their children are less protected than different-sex spouses regarding parental rights, the citizenship of their children, tax credits, access to health care, parental leave and inheritance. Differences in legal gender recognition also negatively impact on trans parents moving to Member States without similar mechanisms, resulting in difficulties or impossibility to recognise their parenthood. In some cases, these parents and their children receive no protection and their families are not even recognised to exist. We believe that every family should continue to exist when crossing EU borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firms Circumnavigating EU Lobbying Rules, Say Transparency Group | the Parliament Magazine
    2/7/2017 Law firms circumnavigating EU lobbying rules, say transparency group | The Parliament Magazine (/) (http://www.twitter.com/parlimag) (https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Parliament-Magazine/471876160233) (http://www.linkedin.com/company/2733254? trk=tyah&trkInfo=tas%3Athe%20parliament%20magazine%2Cidx%3A1-1-1) (/articles/news/rss.xml) Law firms circumnavigating EU lobbying rules, say transparency group Written by Martin Banks on 31 May 2016 in News Claim comes as EU consultation on mandatory transparency register comes to a close. A study by transparency group ALTER-EU says that "too many" law firms in Brussels are absent from the EU lobby transparency register "while clearly running EU lobbying services." Many of the nine law firms highlighted originate in the United States where they are registered in the compulsory US lobby register, says the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation. "The boycott of the voluntary EU lobby register is further evidence to back our demand that European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker should introduce a legally- binding register," says the Brussels-based group. RELATED CONTENT EU transparency register inaccurate, say campaigners (https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/news/eu-transparency-register-inaccurate-say-campaigners) Rebecca Taylor: More transparency needed in EU tobacco dealings (https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/blog/more-transparency-needed-eu-tobacco-dealings) EU Commission under re for lack of transparency in tobacco lobby meetings (https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/news/eu-commission-under-re-lack- transparency-tobacco-lobby-meetings) EU ombudsman wants more transparency on commission-appointed expert groups (https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/news/eu-ombudsman-wants-more- transparency-commission-appointed-expert-groups) The analysis, 'Lobbying law firms - unfinished business', published on Tuesday (May 31), comes as the Commission's three month consultation on a mandatory transparency register comes to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • EP Elections 2014
    EP Elections 2014 Biographies of new MEPs Please find the biographies of all the new MEPs elected to the 8th European Parliamentary term. The information has been collated from published sources and, in many cases, subject to translation from the native language. We will be contacting all MEPs to add to their biographical information over the summer, which will all be available on Dods People EU in due course. EU Elections 2014 Source: European Parliament- 1 - EP Overview (13/06/2014) List of countries: Austria Germany Poland Belgium Greece Portugal Bulgaria Hungary Romania Croatia Ireland Slovakia Cyprus Italy Slovenia Czech Latvia Spain Republic Denmark Lithuania Sweden United Estonia Luxembourg Kingdom Finland Malta France Netherlands EU Elections 2014 - 2 - Austria o People's Party (ÖVP) > EPP o Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) > S&D o Freedom Party (FPÖ) > NI o The Greens (GRÜNE) > Greens/EFA o New Austria (NEOS) > ALDE People’s Party (ÖVP) Claudia Schmidt (ÖVP, Austria) 26 April 1963 (FEMALE) Political: Councils/Public Bodies Member, Municipal Council, City of Salzburg 1999-; Chair, Austrian People's Party (ÖVP) Parliamentary Group, Salzburg Municipal Council 2004-09; Member, responsible for construction and urban development, Salzburg city government, 2009- Party posts: ÖVP: Vice-President, Salzburg, Member of the Board, Salzburg, Political Interest: Disability (social affairs) Personal: Non-political Career: Disability support institution (Lebenshilfe) Salzburg: Manager for special needs education 1989-1996, Officer responsible for
    [Show full text]
  • Study: Mapping Fake News and Disinformation in the Western
    STUDY Requested by the AFET committee Mapping Fake News and Disinformation in the Western Balkans and Identifying Ways to Effectively Counter Them Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union EN PE 653.621 - February 2021 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY Mapping Fake News and Disinformation in the Western Balkans and Identifying Ways to Effectively Counter Them ABSTRACT Disinformation is an endemic and ubiquitous part of politics throughout the Western Balkans, without exception. A mapping of the disinformation and counter-disinformation landscapes in the region in the period from 2018 through 2020 reveals three key disinformation challenges: external challenges to EU credibility; disinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic; and the impact of disinformation on elections and referenda. While foreign actors feature prominently – chiefly Russia, but also China, Turkey, and other countries in and near the region – the bulk of disinformation in the Western Balkans is produced and disseminated by domestic actors for domestic purposes. Further, disinformation (and information disorder more broadly) is a symptom of social and political disorder, rather than the cause. As a result, the European Union should focus on the role that it can play in bolstering the quality of democracy and governance in the Western Balkans, as the most powerful potential bulwark against disinformation. EP/EXPO/AFET/FWC/2019-01/Lot1/R/01 EN February 2021 - PE 653.621 © European Union,
    [Show full text]