DOCSLIB.ORG

Israeli Settlement Policy in Jerusalem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Israeli Settlement Policy in Jerusalem s;q-elJV reuopEw;nuI JO APl1lS :np JOJ AJ~POS :')!W~P~:')V lre!D!ls~red VISSVd r ~d ~J PASSIA) the Palestinian Academic Society for the Study ofIn­ ternational Affairs) is an Arab) non-profit Palestinian institu­ tion) with a financially and legally independent status. It is not affiliated with any government, political party or organization. PASSIA seeks to present the Question ofPalestine in its national) Arab and international contexts through academic research) dialogue and publication. PASSIA endeavors that research undertaken under its auspices be specialized) scientific and objective and that its symposia and workshops) whether international or intra-Palestinian) be open, self-critical and conducted in a spirit of harmony and coopera­ tion. Allison B. Hodgkins is the Academic Director ofthe "Academic Studies Abroad - Middle East: Peace & Conflict" Program of the School for International Training (S11) Vermont) USA. This study - which is presented as the second part ofHodgkins) research on Israeli policies and practices in Jerusalem - represents the free expression ofits author and does not necessarily represent the judgement or opinions ofPASSIA. The paper is presented as part ofthe PASSIA &search Studies Program of1998, which is kindly supported by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation (FES) Jerusalem. Copyright © P ASSIA First Edition - December 1998 PASSIA Publication Tel: 972-2-6264426 • Fax: 972-2-6282819 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.passia.org PO Box 19545 • Jerusalem ~ Foreword .............................................................. Introduction .......................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Palestinian West Jerusalem - The City Before 1948 ..... 7 Chapter 2: The Old City ofJerusalem - Inside Its WaUs ............ 21 Chapter 3: Israeli Settlements in East Jerusalem Since 1967 ....... 41 Chapter 4: Palestinian Neighborhoods in East Jerusalem .......... 63 ChapterS: Greater Jerusalem .............................................. 79 Travel Tips, Resources and Information ........................ 109 Appendices A. Statistics ...................................................... 117 B. Israeli Methods ofExpropriating Land and ControUing Palestinian Development ................. 118 C. Settlements and International Law ..................... 120 D. Resources for Further Information ................... 121 E. Contact Addresses for Advocacy ...................... 123 FDUMlc-ui What is Jerusalem? The question might as well be who is God, or what is faith? Jerusalem is, in the words of an Armenian Jerusalemite, a city of mirrors, where each person's vision of the city depends on the angle from which they look through the glass. Thus, the Jerusalem of a Western Christian is very different from that of a Diaspora Jew, and those two visions diverge from those of Palestinian Christians or Moslems or Israeli Jews. It is this intangible nature ofJerusalem that makes the city so ethereal, so unreal, and so spirituaL Jerusalem is much more than the city or the holy sites: Jerusalem is a symbol, yet it is a symbol for a multitude of changing things. Jerusalem is in­ tensely personal, yet, at the same time, it is also universal. The inher­ ent holiness of the city, built on millenniums of faith, has given it a quality so intensely spiritual that it almost floats above the earth in our minds. Jerusalem is the essence of sacred space. However, Jerusalem is also a modern city with modern problems. The authors of the Hebrew scriptures were very wise in pointing out this distinction by separating Jerusalem into Yerushalim Shel-Malah and Yerushalim Shel-Mata: 'Jerusalem of the sky' and 'Jerusalem of the earth'. According to this separation, a distinction was made between the sacred and profane; thus, Caesar could be responsible for garbage collection without sullying the dty as a place for prayer. Unfortunately, in the throes of the modern national struggle, this dis­ tinction has been lost. Now, heaven and earth collide like two tectonic plates, making Jerusalem the epicenter of seismic activity in the Pales­ tinian-Israeli conflict. In this prism, compromise on anything that has been draped in the cloak of 'Jerusalem' becomes akin to blasphemy. Every motion in the city takes on an emotional intensity that can cause the tenuous status quo to explode. In short, Jerusalem the Holy is also Jerusalem the intractable political mess. How is it possible to negotiate rationally on Jerusalem? As the focal point of the conflict, it is fairly easy to determine where the problem begins. The heart of Jerusalem - and the heart of the conflict - is of course the religious shrines found within the walls of the Old City. However, it is not the center of Jerusalem that is the focus of this book. Rather, it is the outer limits of the Holy City that serve as the subject of this work. With the emotional gaze of the in­ ternational debate directed at heavenly Jerusalem, the rapid expansion of 'sacred space' into tbe West Bank hinterlands escapes our notice. Suddenly, remote hillsides and farming villages that were never con­ sidered part of any urban area, or as having any particular religious significance, are suddenly Jerusalem - suddenly holy and suddenly beyond compromise. While settlement activity in the West Bank and Gaza is almost univer­ sally condemned and recognized as a violation of International Law, settlement for the sake of Jerusalem is somehow excused as an internal Israeli matter. This discrepancy comes from the same contradiction between heaven and earth that clouds the political debate. When we read an article about settlements in Jerusalem, our gaze is somehow blurred by our own images ofJerusalem, the heavenly city, and we are no longer sure what we are talking about. About this Book This book attempts to draw a distinction between the spiritual con­ nections to Jerusalem and the implications of the modern political struggle for the sovereignty on the city and its residents. This work puts aside spiritual considerations and focuses on showing the reader the facts on the ground. It is designed as a tool for understanding how Israeli policy works in Jerusalem, specifically how settlement ac­ tivity in the city relates to the larger Israeli agenda. Unlike other guidebooks on Jerusalem, which attempt to give the visitor a compre­ hensive picture of the city, the sole focus of this work is the impact of these policies on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The intent in presenting this information in the format of a 'guide­ book' is to provide interested groups and individuals with the facts and figures needed to interpret the changes that have taken place in Jerusalem since 1948. The information presented here is neither secret 11 nor subversive. It represents a well-researched collection of historical information and published statistics that describe the issue of settle­ ments. It will be a useful companion for journalists, peace activists, foreign NGO employees, alternative travel or church groups, and other tourists and individuals concerned with the future of Jerul,alem and the peace between Israelis and Palestinians. This book assumes a basic knowledge of the history and politics of Jerusalem since 1948. It includes historical summaries of the essential issues, maps and statistics and has a comprehensive appendix with tips for visitors to Israeli settlements, as well as contact and resource in­ formation. Ifreviewed before an excursion, the different chapters will help place the sites visited in the current political context. Each chapter begins with important statistical information pertaining to the chapter's focus and includes a brief introduction to the issue. In the annex, one then can fmd tips detailing where to go to witness the policy effects or find additional information. The main body of each chapter contains an­ notated text highlighting key sites or components of Israeli policy. Major sites or terms are highlighted in bold to facilitate the location of key pieces of information. The data collected in this work was compiled between 1996 and 1998. The statistics reflect the situation on the ground as of July 1998. However, the historical information and the basic picture remain the same. iii ,~ The issue of settlements remains one of the most contentious issues complicating the Israeli-Palestinian search for peace. Many Israelis and most importantly the Israeli Government view settlements as part and parcel of their historic right to the land of Israel and the right of Jews to live anywhere in their homeland. Palestinians and the majority of the international community view settlements as illegal and as an ob­ stacle to peace. Jerusalem serves as the most dramatic example of the dash of Israeli and Palestinian aspirations in the Holy Land. Jerusa­ lem-area settlements are the most extensive, the most controversial and perhaps the most intractable part of the settlement question. At the most fundamental level, one should at least be aware of their his­ tory, their scope, their impact on the land, and their impact on the current negotiations. Competition for land, the skyline and supremacy in Jerusalem neither begins with the events of 1967 or those of 1948. Furthermore, stak­ ing out sovereignty in the city is not a strictly Zionist enterprise. Every ruler since Herod has attempted to make a mark on the city. Examples are found all over the city of attempts by European powers to establish sovereignty, usually in the form of religious structures, hospices and hospitals that were designed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rapport Des Chefs De Mission Diplomatiques De L'union
    Rapport des Chefs de Mission Diplomatiques de l’Union Européenne sur Jérusalem 2017 Note de synthèse Les Chefs de Mission à Jérusalem et à Ramallah soumettent par le présent document au Comité Politique et de Sécurité le rapport sur Jérusalem pour 2017 (annexe 1) et une série de recommandations pour discussion pour renforcer la politique de l’Union Européenne sur Jérusalem Est (Annexe 2). L’annexe 3 contient des faits supplémentaires et des chiffres sur Jérusalem. Les développements intervenus en 2017 ont encore accéléré les difficultés de la solution « des deux Etats » en l’absence de processus de paix significatif. Les tendances précédentes, observées et décrites par les Chefs de Mission Diplomatiques depuis plusieurs années, se sont empirées. La mise à l’écart des Palestiniens de la vie ordinaire, politique, économique et sociale de la ville sont largement inchangées. Le développement d’un nombre record de plans de colonisation s’est poursuivi, y compris dans des zones identifiées par l’Union Européenne et ses Etats membres comme clés pour une solution « des deux Etats ». En même temps, les démolitions de logements palestiniens se sont poursuivies, et plusieurs familles palestiniennes ont été expulsées de leurs logements au bénéfice de colons. Les tensions autour du Dôme du Rocher / Mont du Temple continuent. Au cours de cette année, plusieurs projets de lois à la Knesset ont poursuivi leur avancée législative, qui, s’ils étaient adoptés, apporteraient des changements unilatéraux au statut et aux frontières de Jérusalem, en violation du droit international. En fin d’année, les Etats Unis ont annoncé leur reconnaissance de Jérusalem comme capitale d’Israël.
    [Show full text]
  • Sur Bahir & Umm Tuba Town Profile
    Sur Bahir & Umm Tuba Town Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation 2012 Palestinian Localities Study Jerusalem Governorate Acknowledgments ARIJ hereby expresses its deep gratitude to the Spanish agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) for their funding of this project. ARIJ is grateful to the Palestinian officials in the ministries, municipalities, joint services councils, village committees and councils, and the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) for their assistance and cooperation with the project team members during the data collection process. ARIJ also thanks all the staff who worked throughout the past couple of years towards the accomplishment of this work. 1 Palestinian Localities Study Jerusalem Governorate Background This report is part of a series of booklets, which contain compiled information about each city, village, and town in the Jerusalem Governorate. These booklets came as a result of a comprehensive study of all villages in Jerusalem Governorate, which aims at depicting the overall living conditions in the governorate and presenting developmental plans to assist in developing the livelihood of the population in the area. It was accomplished through the "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment;" the project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID). The "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment" was designed to study, investigate, analyze and document the socio-economic conditions and the needed programs and activities to mitigate the impact of the current unsecure political, economic and social conditions in the Jerusalem Governorate. The project's objectives are to survey, analyze, and document the available natural, human, socioeconomic and environmental resources, and the existing limitations and needs assessment for the development of the rural and marginalized areas in the Jerusalem Governorate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space of Contested Jerusalem the Middle East, Has Been a City of Quarters
    The Space of Jerusalem is regarded as one of the classic divided cities,1 contested by two peoples, Contested separated by ethnicity, nationality, language Jerusalem and religion, with concrete and visible fissures embedded in the urban fabric. The Wendy Pullan terminology is widely used, by the Conflict in Cities research team as much as anyone else; nonetheless, the complexity of a city like Jerusalem increasingly calls to question the term ‘divided’, with its implied sense of clearly separated sections or two halves roughly equal to each other.2 With respect to Jerusalem, what do we really mean by divided? And if it is a divided city, what form does this take today, for clearly Jerusalem is not the same city that it was in 1967. Over forty years of occupation have produced a situation where the Israelis and Palestinians do not have equal rights and opportunities, and confusion and shifting policies underlie the way the Entrance to the tunnel under the Hebrew city has changed over time. This murky University, Mount Scopus. Source: Conflict in situation is particularly evident, although not Cities. always made explicit or addressed, in the Jerusalem Quarterly 39 [ 39 ] Map of Metropolitan Jerusalem showing settlements, villages and separation barrier. Source: Conflict in Cities. spatial qualities that characterise and differentiate the Palestinian and Israeli sectors. Significant historical residues are still in play in Jerusalem today, yet, much of what is understood as the city’s current urban space has been shaped by the conflict, and conversely, also impacts upon it. It would be fair to say that today the spaces which Israelis and Palestinians inhabit in Jerusalem are radically different from each other, although the divisions between them are not always simple or obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem Between Segregation and Integration: Reading Urban Space Through the Eyes of Justice Gad Frumkin
    chapter 8 Jerusalem between Segregation and Integration: Reading Urban Space through the Eyes of Justice Gad Frumkin Y. Wallach Introduction Jerusalem is seen as an archetypal example of a divided city, where extreme ethno-national polarization is deep rooted in a long history of segregation. In this chapter I challenge this perception by re-examining urban dynamics of late Ottoman and British Mandate Jerusalem, while questioning the manner in which urban segregation is theorized and understood. In the past few decades, there has been a reinvigorated scholarly discus- sion of urban segregation, driven by the challenges of difference and diversity.1 Entrenched segregation between different groups (defined by race, ethnicity, religion or class), or the “parallel lives” of different communities, living side by side with little contact, are seen to undermine the multicultural model of the late twentieth century. At the same time, mechanistic models of integration through urban mixing are increasingly challenged, and it is no longer accepted as evident that segregation is always undesirable. Nor is it obvious that everyday contact between different communities necessarily helps to engender greater understanding and dialogue. Scholars have been debating how to locate the discussion of urban encounter and segregation in the lived experience of the city. Writing on this topic suffers from the idealization of urban cosmopoli- tanism, on the one hand, or, conversely, describing segregation in overdeter- mined terms. To avoid this double pitfall, closer attention to the historical and spatial context is necessary, as well as close examination of socioeconomic real- ities. One suggestion, that I follow in this chapter, is to focus on life histories.2 By 1 This chapter forms part of ‘Conflict in Cities and the Contested Stated’ project, funded by the esrc’s Large Grants Programme (res-060-25-0015).
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem Hanukkah Vacation
    Jerusalem Hanukkah vacation Contact us | turipo.com | [email protected] Jerusalem Hanukkah vacation Our Jerusalem Hanukkah vacaon, the best of Jerusalem in 3 days: Mahne Yehuda market, the Arab market, the David tower, Western wall, Al-Aqsa Mosque, Yad Vashem Museum and more.... Contact us | turipo.com | [email protected] Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /var/www/dev/views/templates/pdf_day_images.php on line 4 Day 1 - Arrival to Jerusalem Accomodation: Rafael Residence Boutique Notice: Trying to get property 'address' of non-object in /var/www/dev/views/pdf.php on line 435 Contact us | turipo.com | [email protected] Day 1 - Arrival to Jerusalem 3. Mahane Yehuda Market apartment building in Hong Kong "Azura", song on the album 1. Tel Aviv-Yafo Don Solaris by 808 State MS Azura, a cruise ship in the P&O Duration ~ 2 Hours Cruises fleet Azura, a tular see in the Roman Catholic Church Duration ~ 2 Hours Mahane Yehuda Market, Jerusalem Azura, the alias of fictional character Romwell Jr in the more.. Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel Website: www.tel-aviv.gov.il WIKIPEDIA 5. Nahalat Shiv'a WIKIPEDIA Mahane Yehuda Market, oen referred to as "The Shuk", is a marketplace in Jerusalem, Israel. Popular with locals and Duration ~ 1 Hour Tel Aviv is the second most populous city in Israel—aer tourists alike, the market's more than 250 vendors sell fresh Nahalat Shiv'a, Jerusalem, Israel Jerusalem—and the most populous city in the conurbaon of fruits and vegetables; baked goods; fish, meat and cheeses; Gush Dan, Israel's largest metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem: City of Dreams, City of Sorrows
    1 JERUSALEM: CITY OF DREAMS, CITY OF SORROWS More than ever before, urban historians tell us that global cities tend to look very much alike. For U.S. students. the“ look alike” perspective makes it more difficult to empathize with and to understand cultures and societies other than their own. The admittedly superficial similarities of global cities with U.S. ones leads to misunderstandings and confusion. The multiplicity of cybercafés, high-rise buildings, bars and discothèques, international hotels, restaurants, and boutique retailers in shopping malls and multiplex cinemas gives these global cities the appearances of familiarity. The ubiquity of schools, university campuses, signs, streetlights, and urban transportation systems can only add to an outsider’s “cultural and social blindness.” Prevailing U.S. learning goals that underscore American values of individualism, self-confidence, and material comfort are, more often than not, obstacles for any quick study or understanding of world cultures and societies by visiting U.S. student and faculty.1 Therefore, international educators need to look for and find ways in which their students are able to look beyond the veneer of the modern global city through careful program planning and learning strategies that seek to affect the students in their “reading and learning” about these fertile centers of liberal learning. As the students become acquainted with the streets, neighborhoods, and urban centers of their global city, their understanding of its ways and habits is embellished and enriched by the walls, neighborhoods, institutions, and archaeological sites that might otherwise cause them their “cultural and social blindness.” Jerusalem is more than an intriguing global historical city.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.Employment Education Hebrew Arnona Culture and Leisure
    Did you know? Jerusalem has... STARTUPS OVER OPERATING IN THE CITY OVER SITES AND 500 SYNAGOGUES 1200 39 MUSEUMS ALTITUDE OF 630M CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS COMMUNITY 51 AND ARTS CENTERS 27 MANAGERS ( ) Aliyah2Jerusalem ( ) Aliyah2Jerusalem JERUSALEM IS ISRAEL’S STUDENTS LARGEST CITY 126,000 DUNAM Graphic design by OVER 40,000 STUDYING IN THE CITY 50,000 VOLUNTEERS Illustration by www.rinatgilboa.com • Learning centers are available throughout the city at the local Provide assistance for olim to help facilitate a smooth absorption facilities. The centers offer enrichment and study and successful integration into Jerusalem. programs for school age children. • Jerusalem offers a large selection of public and private schools Pre - Aliyah Services 2 within a broad religious spectrum. Also available are a broad range of learning methods offered by specialized schools. Assistance in registration for municipal educational frameworks. Special in Jerusalem! Assistance in finding residence, and organizing community needs. • Tuition subsidies for Olim who come to study in higher education and 16 Community Absorption Coordinators fit certain criteria. Work as a part of the community administrations throughout the • Jerusalem is home to more than 30 institutions of higher education city; these coordinators offer services in educational, cultural, sports, that are recognized by the Student Authority of the Ministry of administrative and social needs for Olim at the various community Immigration & Absorption. Among these schools is Hebrew University – centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006
    Annual Report The Jerusalem Foundation Table of Contents 2 A Year in Review 12 From the President 13 The Jerusalem Foundation 18 Culture 26 Coexistence 32 Community 40 Education 48 Financial Data 2006 51 Awards and Scholarships 52 Jerusalem Foundation Donors 2006 57 Jerusalem Foundation Board of Trustees Summer concerts 58 Jerusalem Foundation at Mishkenot Sha'ananim Leadership Worldwide opposite the Old City walls A Year in Review Installation of 5-ton sphere at the Bloomfield Science Museum Shir Hashirim(Song of Songs) Garden at the Ein Yael Living Museum Festival for a Shekel, Summer 2006 The Max Rayne School A Hand in Hand School for Bilingual Education in Jerusalem First Annual Shirehov - Street Poetry Festival, June 2006 Art activities at the Djanogly Visual Arts Center The Katie Manson Sensory Garden From the President Dear Friends, The Jerusalem Foundation is proud of our 40 years of accomplishments on behalf of Jerusalem and all its residents. In every neighborhood of the city, one encounters landmarks of our long journey and the effort to promote a free, pluralistic, modern and tolerant Jerusalem. We are happy to share with you the Jerusalem Foundation’s Annual Report for 2006, another successful year in which we raised a total of $30.5 million in pledges and grants. This brings the total of all donations received by the Foundation in Jerusalem since its establishment to $691 million (about $1.1 billion if adjusted for inflation). The Foundation’s total assets increased over the past year from $115.3 million at the end of 2005 to $123.5 million at the end of 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mughrabi Quarter Digital Archive and the Virtual Illés Relief Initiative
    Are you saying there’s an original sin? The Mughrabi True, there is. Deal with it. Quarter Digital – Meron Benvenisti (2013) Archive and the Few spaces are more emblematic of Jerusalem today than the Western Virtual Illés Relief Wall Plaza, yet few people – including Initiative Palestinian and Israeli residents of Jerusalem alike – are aware of the Maryvelma Smith O’Neil destruction of the old Mughrabi Quarter that literally laid the groundwork for its very creation. For the longue durée of almost eight centuries, the Mughrabi Quarter of Jerusalem had been home to Arabs from North Africa, Andalusia, and Palestine. However, within two days after the 1967 War (10–12 June 1967), the historic neighborhood, located in the city’s southeast corner near the western wall of the Noble Sanctuary (al-Haram al-Sharif), was completely wiped off the physical map by the State of Israel – in flagrant violation of Article 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which stipulates: Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to other public authorities, or to social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.1 Two decades prior to the Mughrabi Quarter demolition, Jerusalem’s designation as a “corpus separatum” had been intended to depoliticize the city through internationalization, under [ 52 ] Mughrabi Quarter & Illés Relief Initiative | Maryvelma Smith O’Neil Figure 1. Vue Générale de la Mosquée d’Omar, Robertson, Beato & Co., 1857. Photo: National Science and Society Picture Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Insiders' Jerusalem - Urgent
    Kristin McCarthy <[email protected]> Insiders' Jerusalem - Urgent. Givat Hamatos tenders to be published. 1 message Daniel Seidemann <[email protected]> Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:30 PM Reply-To: Daniel Seidemann <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Insiders' Jerusalem November 11, 2020 Urgent: Givat Hamatos tenders about to be published Dear Friends, In recent hours, our friends at Peace Now have learned from a highly reliable Israeli government official that the publication of the tender booklet/terms will take place by the end of this week. As many of you know, Givat Hamatos has long been considered a "doomsday" settlement, having major strategic ramifications on the very possibility of any future political agreement, and this publication will bring the scheme to the brink of implementation. The next 24 hours may prove to be critical to deter the Israeli government to proceed with the publication. Our detailed analysis of Givat Hamatos that we published on February 29, 2020 appears below. This is a brief summary of the current acute situation. 1. For decades, there has been a broad consensus in the international community that two Israeli settlement schemes - Givat Hamatos and E-1 - would have a devastating impact on any future political agreements (see the enclosed map). Throughout much of this period, there has been a coherent, focused and sustained international effort, cautioning Israel that this would meet broad and resolute international opposition. Those efforts have, until now, succeeded, and no Israeli Prime Minister, including Netanyahu, has dared take major steps towards implementation. 2. This began to change last February when Netanyahu, fighting for his political life, took steps towards implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Princely Suburb, Armenian Quarter Or Christian Ghetto? the Urban Setting of New Julfa in the Safavid Capital of Isfahan (1605-1722)
    Ina Baghdiantz-MacCabe* Princely Suburb, Armenian Quarter or Christian Ghetto? The Urban Setting of New Julfa in the Safavid Capital of Isfahan (1605-1722) Résumé. Faubourg princier, quartier arménien ou ghetto chrétien ? L’établissement urbain de New Joulfa dans la capitale safavide d’Ispahan (1605-1722). L’article examine les lieux d’habitation des Arméniens à Isfahan et dans le nouveau bourg de la Nouvelle Joulfa, un quartier résidentiel construit spécialement pour recevoir les marchands de soie de Joulfa déportés à Isfahan en 1604 par Abbas Ier (r.1587-1629). Ce quartier se trouve, non sans raison politique, face aux résidences des notables, souvent eux mêmes originaires du Caucase pendant ce règne, dans la nouvelle capitale d’Isfahan. Il est démontré que, contrairement aux villes arabes sous domination ottomane étudiées par André Raymond, comme Alep ou Le Caire, il n’existait pas un quartier arménien. À leur arrivée, seuls les marchands prospères s’étaient vus accorder le droit de séjour dans le bourg de la Nouvelle Joulfa, tandis que les artisans et les domestiques habitaient parmi la population musulmane d’Isfahan même. La Nouvelle Joulfa était strictement réservée aux Joulfains. Aux termes d’un décret, les musulmans, les missionnaires catholiques et les autres arméniens, n’étaient autorisés à y résider. Cette situation changerait vers le milieu du XVIIe siècle. Après 1655, ce qui était un bourg “princier” – car le prévôt des marchands de Joulfa provient, selon les sources, d’une famille considérée princière –, deviendrait un “quartier arménien”, les Arméniens d’ Isfahan, après avoir été chassés de la capitale, ayant été transférés vers le bourg.
    [Show full text]
  • March 16, 2020 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before
    ICC-01/18-79 16-03-2020 1/32 NM PT Original: English Case: ICC-01/18 Date: March 16, 2020 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou SITUATION IN THE STATE OF PALESTINE Public Written Observation of Shurat HaDin on the Issue of Affected Communities Source: SHURAT HADIN – Israel Law Center Israel, 10 HaTa'as Street Ramat Gan, 52512. Phone: 972-3-7514175 Fax: 972-3-7514174 Email: [email protected] 1/32 Case: ICC-01/18 ICC-01/18-79 16-03-2020 2/32 NM PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Fatou Bensouda James Stewart Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence Paolina Messida Xavier-Jean Keita States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae The competent authorities of 'palestine' All Amici Curiae The competent authorities of The State of Israel REGISTRY Registrar Counsel Support Section Peter Lewis Detention Section Victims and Witnesses Unit Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section Philip Ambach Case: ICC-01/18 2/32 ICC-01/18-79 16-03-2020 3/32 NM PT 1. Consistent with the Pre-Trial Chamber's order of Feb 20, 20201, granting leave to submit observations, and in accordance with Rule 103 to the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Shurat HaDin – Israel Law Center (SHD) respectfully submits its written observation in respect of the issue of jurisdiction in the case regarding “The State of Palestine”.
    [Show full text]