DOCSLIB.ORG

HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS in the JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, and BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS in the JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, and BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN THE JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, AND BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By Eric Jacobsen, Mark A. Hardy, and Barbara A. Kurtz U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4164 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY West Trenton, New Jersey 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Mountain View Office Park Box 25425 Suite 206 Federal Center 810 Bear Tavern Road Denver, CO 80225 West Trenton, NJ 08628 CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................. 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Purpose and scope................................................ 2 Previous studies................................................. 2 Acknowledgments.................................................. 2 Description of study area............................................. 4 Location and setting............................................. 4 Climate.......................................................... 4 Geology.......................................................... 6 Hydrogeology..................................................... 6 Methods of investigation.............................................. 8 Ground water..................................................... 8 Water levels................................................ 8 Water quality............................................... 8 Surface water.................................................... 10 Discharge................................................... 10 Water chemistry............................................. 10 Trace elements and organic compounds in bottom sediments.... 13 Benthic macroinvertebrates.................................. 15 Ground water.......................................................... 15 Water levels...................................................... 15 Water quality.................................................... 16 Inorganic constituents...................................... 16 Nitrogen.................................................... 19 Organic constituents........................................ 19 Surface water......................................................... 20 Discharge. ...................................................... 20 Flow-duration curves of Stony Brook.............................. 20 Water quality.................................................... 23 Jacobs Creek................................................ 23 Major ions and field measurements...................... 23 Nitrogen and phosphorus ................................ 23 Trace elements in bottom sediments and surface waters.. 23 Organic compounds in bottom sediments ................. 26 Macroinvertebrate diversities and population densities. 28 Stony Brook................................................. 28 Major ions and field measurements...................... 28 Nitrogen and phosphorus ................................ 31 Trace elements in bottom sediments and surface waters.. 31 Organic compounds in bottom sediments.................. 33 Macroinvertebrate diversities and population densities. 33 Beden Brook................................................. 35 Major ions and field measurements...................... 35 Nitrogen and phosphorus ................................ 38 Trace elements in bottom sediments and surface waters.. 38 Organic compounds in bottom sediments.................. 40 Macroinvertebrate diversities and population densities. 40 Summary and conclusions............................................... 40 References cited...................................................... 46 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Map showing well locations and water levels in the study area, west-central New Jersey, 1987.................. in pocket Figure 1. Map showing location of study area in west-central New Jersey.............................................. 3 2. Graph of average monthly precipitation, 1951-80, and monthly total precipitation for water years 1987 and 1988, New Brunswick, N.J. .............................. 5 3. Map showing generalized bedrock geology and boundaries of the Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook drainage basins......................................... 7 4. Map showing locations of ground-water-quality sampling sites in the Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook drainage basins......................................... 9 5. Map showing locations of low-flow stream-gaging sites in the Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook drainage basins.................................................. 11 6. Map showing locations of stream-sampling sites in the Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook drainage bas ins.................................................. 14 7. Hydrographs of water levels in observation wells in the Passaic Formation....................................... 17 8. Piper diagrams showing percentage distribution of major cations and anions in ground-water samples from wells in the: (A) Passaic Formation, and (B) Stockton and Lockatong Formations and diabase dikes.................. 18 9. Hydrograph showing daily mean discharge of Stony Brook at Princeton, N.J. (station 01401000)...................... 21 10. Flow-duration curves of mean daily discharge at Stony Brook at Princeton, N.J. (station 01401000)............. 22 11. Piper diagram showing percentage distribution of major anions and cations in surface-water samples from Jacobs Creek................................................... 24 12. Histograms showing concentrations of (A) dissolved nitrogen and (B) dissolved phosphorus in surface-water samples from Jacobs Creek............................... 25 13. Histograms showing macroinvertebrate species diversity and population densities at sampling sites on Jacobs Creek................................................... 29 14. Piper diagram showing percentage distribution of major anions and cations in surface-water samples from Stony Brook................................................... 30 15. Histograms showing concentrations of (A) dissolved nitrogen and (B) dissolved phosphorus in surface-water samples from Stony Brook................................ 32 16. Histograms of macroinvertebrate species diversity and population densities at sampling sites on Stony Brook... 36 17. Piper diagram showing percentage distribution of major anions and cations in surface-water samples from Beden Brook................................................... 37 IV ILLUSTRATIONS - -Continued Page Figure 18. Histograms showing concentrations of (A) dissolved nitrogen and (B) dissolved phosphorus in surface-water samples from Beden Brook................................ 39 19. Histograms of macroinvertebrate species diversity and population densities at sampling sites on Beden Brook... 42 TABLES Table 1. Station numbers corresponding to site numbers shown on figure 5................................................ 12 2. Locations, well-construction, and hydrogeologic data for wells in the study area................................. 50 3. Results of chemical analyses of ground-water samples....... 54 4. Discharge and drainage area at surface-water measurement sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook..... 63 5. Location, drainage area, and periods of record for streamflow-measurement sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook............................ 66 6. Results of chemical analyses of surface-water samples from monitoring sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook............................................. 73 7. Results of chemical analyses of low-flow water samples from sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook............................................. 76 8. Percentages and concentrations of trace elements on bottom sediments less than 63 microns in diameter at sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook.............. 78 9. Ratio of concentrations of organic compounds to concentra­ tion of total organic carbon in bottom sediments in Jacobs Creek............................................ 27 10. Concentrations of organic compounds on unsorted bottom sediments at sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook............................................. 80 11. Statistical summary of results of biological analyses of stream samples from sites on Jacobs Creek, Stony Brook, and Beden Brook, 1987................................... 90 12. Ratio of concentrations of organic compounds to concentra­ tion of total organic carbon in bottom sediments in Stony Brook............................................. 34 13. Ratio of concentrations of organic compounds to concentra­ tion of total organic carbon in bottom sediments in Beden Brook............................................. 41 v CONVERSION FACTORS AND VERTICAL DATUM Multiply By To obtain inch (in.) 25.4 millimeter foot (ft) 0.3048 meter mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer square foot (ft2 ) 0.0929 square meter square mile (mi 2 ) 2.590 square kilometer cubic foot per second (ft3 /s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second Temperature Conversion degree Fahrenheit (°F) °C - 5/9 x (°F-32) degree Celsius (°C) Sea level: In this report "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Report for Puget Sound Policymakers
    PUGET SOUND INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | TACOMA TIMELY, LOCAL STORIES ABOUT ECOSYSTEM RECOVERY SPECIAL REPORT FOR PUGET SOUND POLICYMAKERS 2020 CLIMATE ISSUE Introduction Welcome to the 2020 edition of Salish Sea Currents magazine. This is the fourth issue of the magazine, and the first one dedicated to a single theme. All of the stories in this report address the impact of climate change on the Salish Sea ecosystem. about us While this collection is not a report about climate change itself — we health the of the Salish Sea. We journey by boat through one of the will not describe the underlying causes of global warming or even talk region’s last remaining tidal forests and look at how sea level rise about how to reduce greenhouse gasses — it is a lens through which to could threaten hundreds of millions of dollars in habitat restoration view current ecosystem recovery efforts. projects. We report new discoveries about declining kelp beds and break important news about ocean acidification. In all, we offer 12 About The Puget Sound Institute Taken individually, these stories represent some of the most critical compelling stories, each influenced in some way by climate change research being conducted in the Salish Sea. In that spirit, they cross a The Puget Sound Institute (PSI) was established at the University of Washington to identify and catalyze and global CO2 emissions. wide variety of topics, from shoreline armoring to endangered orcas. the science driving Puget Sound and Salish Sea ecosystem recovery. Since its founding in 2010, PSI has Taken together, they are further evidence, if any were needed, that You will notice that this year’s issue is divided into four sections: advanced our understanding of the region through synthesis, original research and communication in climate change affects almost everything we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Queensland, Australia NI 43-101 Report
    Draft Only Houston Seattle Section 1.0: Iron Glenn Project: Northeast Queensland, Australia NI 43-101 Report for: Iron Glen Holdings Limited Southport, Queensland Australia By Michael D. Campbell, P.G., P.H. and Jeffrey D. King, P.G. I2M Associates, LLC Houston, Texas and Seattle, Washington February 9, 2011 Houston Seattle Section 2.0 Table of Contents Page 3.0 Summary………………………………………………… 1 4.0 Introduction ……………………..……………………… 2 4.1 Location of Property ………………………. 2 4.2 Scope of Work ……………………………… 3 4.3 Iron Glen Tenement ……………………….. 4 4.4 Units ………………………………………… 6 5.0 Reliance on Other Experts ……….…………................. 6 6.0 Property Description and Location ….………………… 8 6.1 General Description ……………………….. 8 6.2 Property Ownership and Financial Obligations ………………………………… 10 6.3 Current Royalties & Agreements on Land Access …………………………........... 11 6.4 Permitting ………………………………….. 15 6.5 Environmental Issues ………………………15 7.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ….………….………. 16 7.1 Topography, Elevation, and Vegetation ...... 16 7.2 Accessibility to Properties …………………. 19 7.3 Local Resources ……………………………. 20 7.4 Climate and Seasonal Operations ……..….. 20 7.5 Available Infrastructure …………..……….. 23 8.0 History …………………………………….…………… 23 8.1 Previous Activities ………………...……….. 23 8.2 Previous Exploration Results ……………... 25 9.0 Geology …………………………………………………. 28 1810 Elmen Street, Houston, Texas 77019 Telephone: 713-807-0021 - Fax: 713-807-0985 E-mail: [email protected] – Website: http://www.I2MAssociates.com Page ii Houston Seattle 9.1 Regional Geology ……………………….….. 28 9.2 Local Geology ……………………………… 29 10.0 Deposit Types …………………………..……………… 32 10.1 Contact Metasomatic Deposits …………… 32 10.2 Magnetite as Gangue Mineral ……………. 33 11.0 Mineralization …………………………………………. 34 11.1 Type of Mineralization ……………………. 34 11.2 Magnetics Modeling for Resource Estimates 35 12.0 Exploration …………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report on the Natural History of Kerguelen Island
    SUMMARY REPORT ON THE NATURAE HISTORY OF KERGUELEN ISLAND.* By J. H. KIDDER. M. D. PASSED ASSISTANT SURGEON U. S. NAVY. Navy-Yard, New York, June 12, 1875. Sir: Inclosed herewith I have the honor to forward a sum¬ mary report upon the natural history of Kerguelen Island, as observed by me, omitting all technical details, excepting specific names, where these are known. I have nearly finished rewriting the measurements, descrip¬ tions, and field-notes collected concerning the birds of the island, which Dr. E. Cones, United States Army, has kindly undertaken to edit for me. It has been proposed to me to pub¬ lish this treatise as one of the Bulletins of the National Museum, and, as it is likely to be of interest only to ornithologists, I respectfully request your permission to do so. Very respectfully, J. H. KIDDER, Passed Assistant Surgeon, U. 8. Navy. Surg.-Gen. J. Beale U. S. Navy. '•a The natural-history specimens collected on Kerguelen Island, in connection with the Transit of Venus expedition, having arrived at New York, per sailing-bark from Cape Town, on May 21, have been forwarded to the Smithsonian Institution, and * A detailed report of the natural history of the expedition to Kerguelen Island will soon be published under the authority of the Smithsonian Insti¬ tution. 727 > '* /• V\ 728 SANITARY REPORTS. found to have sustained no material damage by the voyage. 1 am, therefore, now in a position to report briefly the general scientific results of the expedition, with reference to the duty to which I was detailed.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking the Next Step
    Taking the Next Step: Hopewell Township Municipal Assessment March 2002 Stony Brook- Millstone Watershed Association Executive Summary The Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association (the Association) realizes that the protection and health of a watershed relies a great deal on the land use laws and policies that govern development. In the past, we have had requests from various municipalities for assistance with drafting ordinances, improving zoning and increasing local environmental quality. In addition to continuing to respond to these requests, the Association wanted to provide a more comprehensive analysis for local municipalities. Thus, we developed the Municipal Assessment Project to assist municipalities in developing additional proactive measures to ensure that natural resources are preserved and the necessary regulatory structure established. Hopewell Township was the first municipality that accepted our offer of assistance and partnered with us on this project. When beginning the assessment, members of the Hopewell Township Committee, Planning Board, Environmental Commission and Master Plan Committee articulated their goals and vision for the Township by answering our Framework Questions. After evaluating these responses we reviewed Hopewell Township’s land use ordinances, policies, best management practices, and the recently drafted Master Plan using a newly designed 15-page protocol. We also interviewed key personnel to complete the assessment. The results of the assessment protocol were then compared to the goals and vision of the Township, as articulated by its leaders. Gaps between that vision and what was “on the books” - the local zoning and ordinances– were identified in the following twelve areas: 1. Preservation of riparian corridors 2. Protection of surface and ground water 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resources Inventory for the Township and Borough of Princeton
    PRINCETON ERI The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a Commission is dedicated to uniting the stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The region’s elected officials, planning outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, professionals, and the public with the while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware common vision of making a great region River. The two adjoining crescents represent even greater. Shaping the way we live, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding promoting smart growth, protecting the sources, including federal grants from the environment, and enhancing the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) economy. We serve a diverse region of and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Montgomery, and Philadelphia in departments of transportation, as well Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, as by DVRPC’s state and local member Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. governments. This ERI was also funded by ANJEC’s Smart Growth Assistance Program, DVRPC is the federally designated supported by the Geraldine R. Dodge Metropolitan Planning Organization for Foundation. The authors, however, are solely the Greater Philadelphia Region— responsible for the findings and conclusions leading the way to a better future. herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Bernards Township, Somerset County, New Jersey
    Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Bernards Township, Somerset County, New Jersey M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF BERNARDS TOWNSHIP SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY APRIL 11, 2008 Prepared for: Bernards Township 1 Collyer Lane Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 Prepared by: Matthew J. Mulhall, P.G. M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827-4110 908-238-0827 Fax: 908-238-0830 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF BERNARDS TOWNSHIP SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 5 PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE ............................................................................................ 5 SURFACE WATER .......................................................................................................... 6 Watersheds............................................................................................................. 6 Stream Classifications........................................................................................... 7 Headwaters............................................................................................................. 9 SOILS ......................................................................................................................... 10 BEDROCK...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix-J-JCMUA-SIAR-092520.Pdf
    Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission October 2020 PVSC Treatment District Regional Long Term Control Plan Appendix J Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report for Jersey City MUA Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report NJPDES Permit No. NJ0108723 March 2020 Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority January 2020 Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report Page 1 of 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 SECTION B - SCREENING OF CSO CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES ........................................ 9 SECTION C - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES................................................................ 10 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNAtIVES.................................. 11 SECTION D - SELECTION OF RECOMMENDED LTCP ....................................................... 12 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 12 LTCP SELECTION PROCESS ..................................................................................... 12 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................. 12 D.3.1 Description ............................................................................................................... 13 D.3.2
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalized Water-Budget Manual for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Sites in New Jersey
    Regionalized Water Budget Manual for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Sites in New Jersey State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Jon Corzine, Governor Lisa P. Jackson, Commissioner Disclaimer In addition to describing technical aspects of the hydrologic budget and related considerations for wetland mitigation site design, parts of this manual describe specific recommendations and requirements for the preparation of water budgets for wetland mitigation sites in New Jersey. These recommendations and requirements are strictly a matter of NJDEP policy and do not necessarily reflect the policy or opinion of any other organization or contributor. 1 Contents Disclaimer ....................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 10 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................... 11 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... 11 PART I: Background Information for Wetland Mitigation in New Jersey........................ 14 Wetland Definition and Regulation ................................................................................ 15 Growing Season...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Raritan TMDL – Solving In-Stream Nutrient Impairments,” Presented at the NJWEA, Central Section by TRC Omni
    Amendment to the Lower Raritan/Middlesex, Mercer County, Monmouth County, Northeast, Upper Delaware and Upper Raritan Water Quality Management Plans Total Maximum Daily Load Report For the Non-Tidal Raritan River Basin Addressing Total Phosphorus, Dissolved Oxygen, pH and Total Suspended Solids Impairments Watershed Management Areas 8, 9 and 10 Proposed: June 16, 2014 Established: June 2, 2015 Re-submittal: January 19, 2016 Approved: May 9, 2016 Adopted: May 24, 2016 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Monitoring and Standards Bureau of Environmental Analysis, Restoration and Standards PO Box 420, Mail Code: 401-04I Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0420 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………..……………. 4 2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….…... 8 3.0 Pollutant of Concern and Area of Interest…………………………………….…… 9 4.0 Source Assessment………………………………………………………………..….. 24 5.0 Analytical Approach and TMDL Calculation …………………………………..… 28 6.0 Follow-up Monitoring…………………………………………………………..…… 45 7.0 Implementation Plan……………………………………………………………..….. 45 8.0 Reasonable Assurance…………………………………………………………….…. 58 9.0 Public Participation………………………………………………………………….. 58 Appendix A: Cited References………………………………………………………..... 79 Appendix B: Municipalities Located in the Raritan River Basin, NJPDES Permit Number and their MS4 Designation ……………………….…. 81 Appendix C: Additional Impairments within TMDL Area …………………………. 84 Appendix D: TMDLs completed in the Raritan River Basin ……………………...…. 89 Appendix E: New Jersey Water Supply Authority - Nonpoint Source Implementation Activities ……………………...….……………………...….………………. 91 Tables Table 1. Assessment units addressed by the TMDL report……………………………… 6 Table 2. HUC 14 watersheds assessed by this TMDL study………………………..…… 17 Table 3. 2007 Land Use in the Raritan River Basin Covered by this TMDL………..….. 23 Table 4. Permitted Point Sources within the Non-Tidal Raritan River TMDL Study Area ……………………………………………………………….….
    [Show full text]
  • Hopewell Township Municipal Wastewater Management Plan
    Township of Hopewell (1106) Introduction This municipal chapter is an element of the Mercer County Wastewater Management Plan prepared by the Mercer County Planning Division in accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:15. Hopewell Township is located in the northeastern portion of Mercer County and encompasses approximately 59 square miles. Although the Township contains pockets of suburban growth, it retains a rural-like atmosphere, with rolling, rural landscapes primarily in the north. Amidst the Township’s suburban and rural landscapes are located the two self-governing, established Boroughs of Pennington and Hopewell. Both suburban and rural lands are intersected by a network of streams that make their way to a larger system of rivers and streams that define two sides of the Township boundary. A little less than half of the stream corridors flow through preserved open space. Approximately 35 percent of the Township’s land is located in the agriculture development area and is eligible for farmland preservation programs. In addition, approximately 30 percent of the Township is comprised of public parks and preserved open space. These areas primarily include large regional parks, natural, and cultural areas. The remaining land within the Township consists mainly of residential housing, commercial uses, and corporate campuses. Residential housing is found throughout the Township with the densest housing found in the southern portion. Commercial and commercially-zoned land uses are primarily located along the Route 31 corridor. The Township zoning designations are shown on Map 4M. Aside from the Federal and state highways I-95, Route 29, and Route 31, the township roadways are primarily comprised of county and local roads.
    [Show full text]
  • SOMERSET County
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 15 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 6/23/2021 SOMERSET County Pluckemin Continental Artillery Cantonment Site (28-So-27) SOMERSET County (ID#4769) NR: 3/14/2008 (NR Reference #: 08000180) SR: 1/17/2008 Bedminster Township Bedminster Reformed Church (Grace Fellowship Church) (ID#3531) Pluckemin Village Historic District (ID#2465) 375 Main Street District is concentrated along US Route 206 and Burnt Mills Road SHPO Opinion: 2/25/1985 NR: 7/26/1982 (NR Reference #: 82003303) COE: 6/23/2005 SR: 2/22/1982 Greater Cross Roads Historic District (ID#3441) Pottersville Village Historic District (ID#1633) Lamington Road County Route 512, Hill Street, and McCann Mill Road, Black River and Hacklebarney roads SHPO Opinion: 6/13/1997 NR: 9/18/1990 (NR Reference #: 90001475) SR: 8/9/1990 Hamilton Farm Stable Complex (ID#5101) 1040 Pottersville Road See Main Entry / Filed Location: NR: 5/18/2018 (NR Reference #: RS100001243) HUNTERDON County, Tewksbury Township SR: 4/6/2017 COE: 8/3/2011 Jacobus Vanderveer House (ID#2808) (a.k.a. James Cox Brady Stable, U.S. Equestian Team US Routes 202 and 206, north of River Road Headquarters, COE is for individual property) NR: 9/29/1995 (NR Reference #: 95001137) SR: 7/13/1995 A. Herzog Farmstead (ID#2459) 190 Pottersville Road Vanderveer Archaeological Site (28-So-97) (ID#2466) SHPO Opinion: 12/29/1993 SHPO Opinion: 11/1/1988 Lamington Historic District (ID#2461) Portions of Lamington, Black River, Rattlesnake Bridge and Bernards Township
    [Show full text]
  • Map 5. AMNET Stream Biological Monitoring Stations
    . Y E Y , S R D S A R T A E E T E I U D T N A J T T B N C O D N , A I O A W D E A H S G S C R E E I T . H S R N T I E I P S N H T S ’ R Y X S E D T M O F R D . A T E L I L R U E D F E E O Y L O W L E E H N A I S E O T E 02030105110080 S V P C T T A N B N U H T T O . E W E N L A E N A I C S E A N H S A I E I C P D D ’ H L S E U I R D N L E T M H D R R T O R T N S R E A H . R S D T PIKE RUN (ABOVE CRUSER BROOK) N U R E I T E T S S A I O E I I E O S S O E K A N I D R R W H S U . T W B E S : I N Y T T A W I E O E . C E E D S N I P F Y R . D H S N H E G A A L R O T H T E O S : C H A H F O Y B S E C N N S U S T M , E E O Y I S N , U T A D I O A S R E I E W S W N E S O D D Y T E R B S E R E I O U S R S R E I A U H P I R V E A B M J P T E R X F O D E S N A P P S E M O D F I E K O R W A T T A P E O T , E H E Y N S C D S W R M E G C C HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP S H T N I E I S U E U 02030105030060 T O R T I N S P S L E Y I D A E I N L C A E T E E W N B H O B P P O SOMERSET COUNTY B L I R U T D O T R H I R P E MONTGOMERY D M S A P T O T F A P I NESHANIC RIVER (BELOW FNR / SNR CONFL) U N R E P E N H F D C I TOWNSHIP T F S P R R O P D R T K O O C A I O A I E O L T A P A O D O P P N T U W R S O I M Y T N O E U C E E A O N T H A D Y I R H R U S R M H S E D N L D R P .
    [Show full text]