The Classical Quarterly VEILED OR UNVEILED? (PLUT. QUAEST. ROM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Classical Quarterly VEILED OR UNVEILED? (PLUT. QUAEST. ROM The Classical Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ Additional services for The Classical Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here VEILED OR UNVEILED? (PLUT. QUAEST. ROM. 267B–C) J.L. HILTON and L.L.V. MATTHEWS The Classical Quarterly / Volume 58 / Issue 01 / May 2008, pp 336 ­ 342 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838808000323, Published online: 18 April 2008 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009838808000323 How to cite this article: J.L. HILTON and L.L.V. MATTHEWS (2008). VEILED OR UNVEILED? (PLUT. QUAEST. ROM. 267B–C). The Classical Quarterly, 58, pp 336­342 doi:10.1017/S0009838808000323 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ, IP address: 146.230.128.50 on 06 Dec 2012 Color profile: Generic offset separations profile Black 150 lpi at 45 degrees 336 SHORTER NOTES ‘sexual wrestling’ or ‘sexual battle’.6 Since the idea is such a common one, there is of course no way of positively proving that Leucippe 5.3.5 echoes a tragic passage. However, as a look at n. 6 will confirm, use of wrestling-imagery to refer to the sexual act is rare: it is rather images of fighting or of training and exercising that prevail. Moreover, aside from Paulus Silentiarius, the use of π0μαιτνα! παμαιτυ@Κ and the like as euphemisms for sex seems to be limited to Aeschylus. In addition, π0μθξ `ζσοδτιοξ in Achilles Tatius contains an epithet which in tragedy occurs only in Sophocles (fr. 166 Radt λ2ζσοδιταξ 4ησαξ). It is not beyond belief, then, that Leucippe 5.3.5 may conceal a reminiscence of a tragic trimeter, e.g. × — παμαψξ `ζσοδτιοξ π0μθξ (Kovacs per litteras), which would preserve Tatius’ phraseology practically intact. There may, however, be a difficulty here, in that the only tragic instance of `ζσοδτιοΚ that is metrically unambiguous, namely S. fr. 277.1 Radt, scans with short first syllable (in S. fr. 166 the word is in crasi). This is, of course, no fatal objection per se, considering that `ζσοδυθ sometimes has a long first syllable (E. Ba. 225, 459; IA 1159; fr. 23.2, 26.1, 898,1 Kannicht). However, since Sophocles does not seem to use (fr. 1130.10 Radt is of uncertain authorship), a reconstruction involving π0μαιτνα might have more to recommend it. The putative Sophoclean original could have been e.g. `ζσοδιτοιτιξ νπμαλεGΚ παματνατιξ (the three-word trimeter may have attracted attention to a climactic moment), or perhaps `ζσοδτιοξ π0μαιτνα υ[δ) πενβαμAξ. There are, of course, numerous other possibilities. Université de Montréal VAYO S J. L I A P I S [email protected] doi:10.1017/S0009838808000311 6 Here are the parallels cited by West: Thgn. 1335–6 iμβιοΚ! SτυιΚ σ*ξ ηφνξ0ευαι ο4λαδε μρAξ! / εδψξ τcξ λαμD παιδG παξθν-σιοΚ; Eup. fr. 171.2 K.-A. ο<δ) ο4λαδ) μρVξ υPξ τεαφυο" ηφνξ0τειΚ δ0νασυα;; Ov. Her. 5.140–1 ille meae spolium uirginitatis habet, / id quoque luctando; Suet. Dom.22assiduitatem concubitus uelut exercitationis genus clinopalem uocabat; Apul. Met. 2.17 proeliare…comminus…derige et grassare nauiter et occide moriturus…hodierna pugna,and9.5(Veneris) colluctationibus; Paul. Sil. A.P. 5.259.5–7 λεM νTξ παξξφγwτιξ Hνιμ@τατα παματυσαιΚ / υα"υα ζ-σειΚ [i.e., bruises], iμβοφ παξυQΚ #πεσπ-υαυαι / SΚ τε πεσιπμ-ηδθξ 'γε π@γετιξ. We may add 4ηγειξ, a technical term from wrestling used with sexual innuendo in Herodas 1.18: see Headlam/Knox ad loc. VEILED OR UNVEILED? (PLUT. QUAEST. ROM. 267B–C) υα=Κ δT ηφξαιωGξ ο<δ) SμψΚ ω?ξ πιλαμ1πυετραι υPξ λεζαμ@ξn Lτυοσε=υαι ηο"ξ Sυι πσ*υοΚ νTξ ω-βαμε ηφξα=λα ΤπσιοΚ ΛασβμιοΚ π) 2υελξ! δε1υεσοΚ δT ΤοφμπλιοΚ Η0μμοΚ ζεμλφταν-ξθξ MδVξ λαυ1 λεζαμ?Κ υQ Lν0υιοξ! υσυοΚ δT ΠπμιοΚ ΤενπσAξιοΚ 2η*ξα 100 ρεψσ@ταταξ πιυ0ζιοξe Plut. Quaest. Rom. 267B–C. (Nachstädt, Sieveking, Titchener 1971). 95 Were women not at all allowed to veil their heads? At any rate it is recorded that Spurius Carvilius was the first to divorce his wife on account of her barrenness, that Sulpicius Gallus was 75 second to do so, after seeing his wife pulling her himation over her head, and that Publius Sempronius was the third – his wife had gone to watch the funeral games. Plutarch’s source for these anecdotes was in all probability Valerius Maximus. 25 Plutarch is known to have made use of the Roman moralist elsewhere in his 5 0 CAQ58-1-final-black.prn S:\Journals\classq\58-1\typeset\CAQ58-1-final.vp 09 April 2008 09:15:02 Plate: 335 of 398 Color profile: Generic offset separations profile Black 150 lpi at 45 degrees SHORTER NOTES 337 work.1 In the passage quoted above he has grouped together three anecdotes of high-handed behaviour by Roman husbands in the same order in which they appear in the Facta et Dicta Memorabilia: first, Spurius Carvilius’ divorce of his wife for not producing children (primus autem Sp. Caruilius uxorem sterilitatis causa dimisit, ‘Spurius Carvilius was the first to divorce his wife on account of her barrenness’, Val. Max. 2.1.4); second, Sulpicius Galus’ repudiation of his spouse for not wearing a veil (horridum C. quoque Sulpicii Galli maritale supercilium: nam uxorem dimisit, quod eam capite aperto foris uersatam cognouerat, ‘the marital arrogance of C. Sulpicius Gallus was also harsh – he divorced his wife, because he found out that she had gone about outdoors with her head uncovered’, Val. Max. 6.3.10); and, finally, the notice of separation served on his wife by Publius Sempronius (iungendus est his P. Sempronius Sophus, qui coniugem repudii nota adfecit, nihil aliud quam se ignorante ludos ausam spectare, ‘to these must be added Publius Sempronius Sophus, who issued his wife with a notice of divorce, for no other reason than she dared to watch the games without his knowledge’, Val. Max. 6.3.12). The first example is found at some remove from the second and third and was clearly selected by Plutarch as a further instance of arrogant behaviour by Roman men to add to the others, rather than being part of a ready-made group taken from a single passage. However, it is also conceivable that both Plutarch and Valerius Maximus encountered these cases in Varro’s De Vita Populi Romani, since Plutarch cites Varro in the passage immediately preceding the anecdote of Spurius Carvilius’ divorce (Quaest. Rom. 264D9), and Valerius also cites Varro on one occasion (3.2.24) and evidently made use of his material elsewhere.2 A further possibility is that information about Sulpicius Galus, if not about all three divorce cases, came from the treatise on dowries of his first-century descendant, the lawyer Publius Sulpicius Rufus, whom Aulus Gellius mentions as the source of his information about the Carvilius case (Noct. Att. 4.3, cf. Cic. Fam. 4.6.1). This tangled web of related texts is evidence of the strong interest aroused by the Carvilius incident, traditionally the first divorce in the history of Roman law. 3 More importantly for the purposes of the present note, it shows that the relationship between Plutarch and Valerius Maximus may not necessarily be a simple or unmediated one. 1 For the Quellenforschung on Valerius Maximus, see M. Bloomer, Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility (Chapel Hill, 1992) 59–146. Support comes from C. Pelling, Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies (London, 2002), 83; L.A.G. Moreno, ‘Paradoxography and political ideas in Plutarch’s Life of Sertorius’, in P.A. Stadter (ed.) Plutarch and the Historical Tradition (London, 1992), 150; L. van der Stockt, ‘Plutarch’s use of literature: sources and citations in the Quaestiones Romanae’, AncSoc 18 (1987), 281–92, at p. 286, citing A. Sickinger, De linguae latinae apud Plutarchum et reliquiis et vestigiis (Diss. Friburgi Brisgoviae, 1883), 65–6; J.L. Moles, ‘Fate, Apollo and M. Junius Brutus’, AJP 104 (1983), 249–56, at 252: ‘Plutarch certainly knew, and apparently sometimes used, Valerius Maximus’, quoting Brut. 53.5, where Plutarch cites Valerius as his authority for Porcia’s state of mind after the death of her husband, 100 to which may be added Marc. 30.5 where Plutarch cites Valerius on Hannibal’s treatment of Marcellus’ corpse. On the Roman Questions in general, see J. Boulogne, ‘Les Questions romaines de Plutarque’ in H. Temporini and W. Haase (edd.), ANRW 2.33.6 (Berlin, 1992), 4682–702; H.J. 95 Rose, The Roman Questions of Plutarch: A New Translation with Introductory Essays and a Running Commentary (New York, 1975 [reprint of Oxford, 1924 edition]). 75 2 Bloomer (n. 1), 114, suggests the connection between Valerius and Varro here. 3 The case is also discussed by Dionysius of Halicarnassus (2.25.7), Plutarch (Rom. et Thes. 6.4.6, Lyc. et Num. 3.6–7), and Aulus Gellius (17.21.44). For the legal significance of the case, see A. Watson, ‘The divorce of Carvilius Ruga’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis (1961) 243–58 = 25 Studies in Roman Private Law (London), 23–36. 5 0 CAQ58-1-final-black.prn S:\Journals\classq\58-1\typeset\CAQ58-1-final.vp 09 April 2008 09:15:03 Plate: 336 of 398 Color profile: Generic offset separations profile Black 150 lpi at 45 degrees 338 SHORTER NOTES In addition to the problem of the sources for the tale of Galus’ divorce, there is the possibility that the confusion is a result of a textual error in Valerius Maximus. There occurs in the MS tradition of Valerius a variation between capite aperto (‘with unveiled head’) and capite operto (‘with veiled head’); the latter is the reading given in the Paris MS of the Facta et Dicta Memorabilia.
Recommended publications
  • Vestal Virgins and Their Families
    Vestal Virgins and Their Families Andrew B. Gallia* I. INTRODUCTION There is perhaps no more shining example of the extent to which the field of Roman studies has been enriched by a renewed engagement with anthropology and other cognate disciplines than the efflorescence of interest in the Vestal virgins that has followed Mary Beard’s path-breaking article regarding these priestesses’ “sexual status.”1 No longer content to treat the privileges and ritual obligations of this priesthood as the vestiges of some original position (whether as wives or daughters) in the household of the early Roman kings, scholars now interrogate these features as part of the broader frameworks of social and cultural meaning through which Roman concepts of family, * Published in Classical Antiquity 34.1 (2015). Early versions of this article were inflicted upon audiences in Berkeley and Minneapolis. I wish to thank the participants of those colloquia for helpful and judicious feedback, especially Ruth Karras, Darcy Krasne, Carlos Noreña, J. B. Shank, and Barbara Welke. I am also indebted to George Sheets, who read a penultimate draft, and to Alain Gowing and the anonymous readers for CA, who prompted additional improvements. None of the above should be held accountable for the views expressed or any errors that remain. 1 Beard 1980, cited approvingly by, e.g., Hopkins 1983: 18, Hallett 1984: x, Brown 1988: 8, Schultz 2012: 122. Critiques: Gardner 1986: 24-25, Beard 1995. 1 gender, and religion were produced.2 This shift, from a quasi-diachronic perspective, which seeks explanations for recorded phenomena in the conditions of an imagined past, to a more synchronic approach, in which contemporary contexts are emphasized, represents a welcome methodological advance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey in Pictures Through Roman Religion
    A Journey in Pictures through Roman Religion By Ursula Kampmann, © MoneyMuseum What is god? As far as the Romans are concerned we think we know that all too well from our unloved Latin lessons: Jupiter, Juno, Minerva, the Roman Triad as well as the usual gods of the ancient world, the same as the Greek gods in name and effect. In fact, however, the roots of Roman religion lie much earlier, much deeper, in dark, prehistoric times ... 1 von 20 www.sunflower.ch How is god experienced? – In the way nature works A bust of the goddess Flora (= flowering), behind it blossom. A denarius of the Roman mint master C. Clodius Vestalis, 41 BC Roman religion emerged from the magical world of the simple farmer, who was speechless when faced with the miracles of nature. Who gave the seemingly withered trees new blossom after the winter? Which power made the grain of corn in the earth grow up to produce new grain every year? Which god prevented the black rust and ensured that the weather was fine just in time for the harvest? Who guaranteed safe storage? And which power was responsible for making it possible to divide up the corn so that it sufficed until the following year? Each individual procedure in a farmer's life was broken down into many small constituent parts whose success was influenced by a divine power. This divine power had to be invoked by a magic ritual in order to grant its help for the action. Thus as late as the imperial period, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Roman Female Suicide. Phd Thesis
    GUILT, REDEMPTION AND RECEPTION: REPRESENTING ROMAN FEMALE SUICIDE ELEANOR RUTH GLENDINNING, BA (Hons) MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy DECEMBER 2011 Abstract This thesis examines representations of Roman female suicide in a variety of genres and periods from the history and poetry of the Augustan age (especially Livy, Ovid, Horace, Propertius and Vergil), through the drama and history of the early Principate (particularly Seneca and Tacitus), to some of the Church fathers (Tertullian, Jerome and Augustine) and martyr acts of Late Antiquity. The thesis explores how the highly ambiguous and provocative act of female suicide was developed, adapted and reformulated in historical, poetic, dramatic and political narratives. The writers of antiquity continually appropriated this controversial motif in order to comment on and evoke debates about issues relating to the moral, social and political concerns of their day: the ethics of a voluntary death, attitudes towards female sexuality, the uses and abuses of power, and traditionally expected female behaviour. In different literary contexts, and in different periods of Roman history, writers and thinkers engaged in this same intellectual exercise by utilising the suicidal female figure in their works. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council for providing the financial assistance necessary for me to carry out this research. The Roman Society also awarded a bursary that allowed me to undertake research at the Fondation Hardt pour I'etude de I'antiquite classique, in Geneva, Switzerland (June 2009). I am also grateful for the CAS Gender Histories bursary award which aided me while making revisions to the original thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • El Elemento Subjetivo En El Edictum De Adtemptata Pudicitia: La Contravención De Los Boni Mores Como Requisito Esencial Para La Existencia De Responsabilidad
    EL ELEMENTO SUBJETIVO EN EL EDICTUM DE ADTEMPTATA PUDICITIA: LA CONTRAVENCIÓN DE LOS BONI MORES COMO REQUISITO ESENCIAL PARA LA EXISTENCIA DE RESPONSABILIDAD Dora de Lapuerta Montoya El propósito que guía estas líneas es la profundización en el elemento intencio­ nal de una especial manifestación del delito de injurias, la que aparece en la recons­ trucción del edicto de Lenel (Edictum Perpetuum J pAOO) bajo la rúbrica edictal De adtemptata pudicitia: Si quis matrifamilias aut praetextato praetextataeve comitem abduxisse sive quis eum eamve adversus bonos mores appellasse adsectatusve esse dicetur. I Sin olvidar la finalidad de nuestro análisis, conviene previamente enmarcar el atentado al pudor2 dentro de la evolución histórica del concepto y regulación de la iniu­ ria, así como ofrecer una serie de precisiones sobre las conductas punibles y personas protegidas, que servirán de base para proceder a examinar el elemento subjetivo de este concreto supuesto de injurias, con el propósito de contribuir a arrojar algo de claridad en tomo al controvertido fragmento ulpianeo recogido en DA7, l0,15,15. El desenvolvimiento del derecho regulador de la iniuria revela un proceso de progresiva desmaterialización del ilícito, desde la pura lesión fisica hasta la ofensa a la buena reputación y al decoro, de carácter típicamente romano. Siguiendo la opinión I La reconstrucción que defiende LENEL se fundamenta, en gran parte, sobre 1.4,4,1: Iniuria autem committitur non solum, cum quis pugno puta... sive quis matrem familias aut praetextatum praetextatamve adsectatusfuerit, sive cuius pudicitia attemptata esse dicetur. .. n. Este texto, como señala LENEL por medio del paréntesis, reproduce con algunas añadiduras a Gayo 3,220: Iniuria autem committitur non solum, cum quis pugno..
    [Show full text]
  • The Eternal Fire of Vesta
    2016 Ian McElroy All Rights Reserved THE ETERNAL FIRE OF VESTA Roman Cultural Identity and the Legitimacy of Augustus By Ian McElroy A thesis submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in Classics Written under the direction of Dr. Serena Connolly And approved by ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS The Eternal Fire of Vesta: Roman Cultural Identity and the Legitimacy of Augustus By Ian McElroy Thesis Director: Dr. Serena Connolly Vesta and the Vestal Virgins represented the very core of Roman cultural identity, and Augustus positioned his public image beside them to augment his political legitimacy. Through analysis of material culture, historiography, and poetry that originated during the principate of Augustus, it becomes clear that each of these sources of evidence contributes to the public image projected by the leader whom Ronald Syme considered to be the first Roman emperor. The Ara Pacis Augustae and the Res Gestae Divi Augustae embody the legacy the Emperor wished to establish, and each of these cultural works contain significant references to the Vestal Virgins. The study of history Livy undertook also emphasized the pathetic plight of Rhea Silvia as she was compelled to become a Vestal. Livy and his contemporary Dionysius of Halicarnassus explored the foundation of the Vestal Order and each writer had his own explanation about how Numa founded it. The Roman poets Virgil, Horace, Ovid, and Tibullus incorporated Vesta and the Vestals into their work in a way that offers further proof of the way Augustus insinuated himself into the fabric of Roman cultural identity by associating his public image with these honored priestesses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imperial Cult and the Individual
    THE IMPERIAL CULT AND THE INDIVIDUAL: THE NEGOTIATION OF AUGUSTUS' PRIVATE WORSHIP DURING HIS LIFETIME AT ROME _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Department of Ancient Mediterranean Studies at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by CLAIRE McGRAW Dr. Dennis Trout, Dissertation Supervisor MAY 2019 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled THE IMPERIAL CULT AND THE INDIVIDUAL: THE NEGOTIATION OF AUGUSTUS' PRIVATE WORSHIP DURING HIS LIFETIME AT ROME presented by Claire McGraw, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _______________________________________________ Professor Dennis Trout _______________________________________________ Professor Anatole Mori _______________________________________________ Professor Raymond Marks _______________________________________________ Professor Marcello Mogetta _______________________________________________ Professor Sean Gurd DEDICATION There are many people who deserve to be mentioned here, and I hope I have not forgotten anyone. I must begin with my family, Tom, Michael, Lisa, and Mom. Their love and support throughout this entire process have meant so much to me. I dedicate this project to my Mom especially; I must acknowledge that nearly every good thing I know and good decision I’ve made is because of her. She has (literally and figuratively) pushed me to achieve this dream. Mom has been my rock, my wall to lean upon, every single day. I love you, Mom. Tom, Michael, and Lisa have been the best siblings and sister-in-law. Tom thinks what I do is cool, and that means the world to a little sister.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vestal Virgins' Socio-Political Role and the Narrative of Roma
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2021; 14 (2), s. 127–151 doi:10.4467/20844131KS.21.011.13519 www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa Zeszyt 2 Karolina WyrWińsKa http:/orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-6271 Jagiellonian University in Kraków The Vestal Virgins’ Socio-political Role and the Narrative of Roma Aeterna Abstract Roman women – priestesses, patrician women, mysterious guardians of the sacred flame of goddess Vesta, admired and respected, sometimes blamed for misfortune of the Eternal City. Vestals identified with the eternity of Rome, the priestesses having a specific, unavailable to other women power. That power gained at the moment of a ritual capture (captio) and responsibilities and privileges resulted from it are the subject matter of this paper. The special attention is paid to the importance of Vestals for Rome and Romans in various historic moments, and to the purifying rituals performed by Vestals on behalf of the Roman state’s fortune. The study presents probable dating and possible causes of the end of the College of the Vestals in Rome. Keywords: Vesta, vestals, priesthood, priestesses, rituals Słowa kluczowe: Westa, westalki, kapłaństwo, kapłanki, rytuały Vesta and her priestesses Plutarch was not certain to which of the Roman kings attribute the implementation of the cult of Vesta in Rome, for he indicated that it had been done either by the legendary king- priest Numa Pompilius or even Romulus, who himself being a son of a Vestal Virgin, according to the legend, transferred the cult of the goddess from Alba Longa,1 which was contradicted by Livy’s work that categorically attributes the establishment of the Vestal Virgins to Numa by removing the priesthood structure from Alba Longa and providing it with support from the state treasury as well as by granting the priestesses numerous privileges”.2 Vesta, the daughter of Saturn and Ops became one of the most important 1 Plut.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid's Wife in the Tristia and Epistulae Ex Ponto
    OVID’S WIFE IN THE TRISTIA AND EPISTULAE EX PONTO: TRANSFORMING EROTIC ELEGY INTO CONJUGAL ELEGY by AMY NOHR PETERSEN (Under the Direction of T. KEITH DIX) ABSTRACT Augustus exiled Ovid to Tomis in AD 8 in part, the poet says, because of his carmen, the Ars Amatoria. Ovid presents the misfortunes of exile in two collections of elegiac epistles, the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. As the recipient of nine epistles, Ovid’s wife is his most frequent addressee. Other poems throughout the two works also mention her. Ovid models the persona of his wife in the exile poetry on characters he developed in the Amores, Heroides, and Ars Amatoria. She appears initially as an abandoned heroine, then as a beloved from whom Ovid seeks fulfillment of his needs, and eventually becomes a pupil in imperial courtship. The resulting “conjugal love elegy” does not replace his earlier erotic elegy but recasts it as a means for Ovid to lament his misfortunes, present a new image for his poet-narrator, and immortalize his genius. INDEX WORDS: Augustus, Coniunx, Elegy, Epistolary Poetry, Epistulae, Exile, Latin, Livia, Ovid, Ovid’s wife, Tristia OVID’S WIFE IN THE TRISTIA AND EPISTULAE EX PONTO: TRANSFORMING EROTIC ELEGY INTO CONJUGAL ELEGY by AMY NOHR PETERSEN B.A., The University of Minnesota, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Amy Nohr Petersen All Rights Reserved OVID’S WIFE IN THE TRISTIA AND EPISTULAE EX PONTO: TRANSFORMING EROTIC ELEGY INTO CONJUGAL ELEGY by AMY NOHR PETERSEN Major Professor: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Culture and the Greek and Latin Classroom
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Classics, Philosophy, and Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2018 Material Culture and the Greek and Latin Classroom Liane Houghtalin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/cpr Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, and the Education Commons Teaching Classical Languages Volume 9, Issue 1 Houghtalin 39 Material Culture and the Greek and Latin Classroom Liane Houghtalin University of Mary Washington ABSTRACT Responding to the new Standards for Classical Language Learning, this article emphasizes the importance of material culture to the study of Greek and Latin language and literature at every level, both K-12 and college. Using inscriptions on Greek vases and Roman coins as well as maps and house plans as examples, it demonstrates ways to insert material culture into the Greek and Latin classroom that will enhance a student’s knowledge of the language. It also shows how the use of material culture will help a class meet not only the Cultures goal of the new Standards, but also the Connections, Comparisons, and Communication goals. KEYWORDS Roman coins, material culture, inscriptions, maps, house plans, Standards, Greek vases A student starting French or Spanish can hold a short conversation in the target language after just one week of class. What can we offer students beginning their journey in ancient Greek or Latin? This article will demonstrate ways to insert material culture into high school and college Greek and Latin classrooms through inscriptions on Greek vases and Roman coins and through the exploration of maps and plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities Joy H. Kim Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Joy H., "Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/653 FEMALE PATRONAGE OF PUBLIC SPACE IN ROMAN CITIES By Joy Kim Senior Honors Thesis for Classical Studies and Urban Studies Advisors: Dr. Gary Reger, Dr. Garth Myers Spring 2017 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 DEFINING PATRONS AND BENEFACTORS ...................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 8 TYPES OF ROMAN PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE ................................................................................ 11 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................ 13 CHAPTER ONE: EXEMPLARY IMPERIAL WOMEN .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6 the God Liber and the Republican Notions of Libertas in the Late Roman Republic
    6 The god Liber and the Republican Notions of Libertas in the late Roman Republic I This essay focuses on the Roman god Liber and its relation with the notion of libertas in the first century BC. A very powerful, and prima facie convincing, explanation of this relation is, in the words of one of the most authoritative scholars in the field, that ‘by name and by nature, Liber is the god of freedom … Though many explanations were offered by ancient sources to account for his name, the simplest and most obvious was an ideological one: Liber a libertate. Political freedom, libertas, was the defining quality of the Roman Republic, achieved by the expulsion of Tarquin and under threat ever after,’ and which found its divinisation in Liber.1 a notable exception Raaflaub 2000 in Hansen birthday, 257. Il punto non e’ sbagliato, ma richiede revision. Non si tratat della political liberty di provocatio. However, when analysing the evidence at our disposal, it is possible to observe that Liber is conceived as enacting different forms of liberation: Liber frees the individual from worries and fears, frees the soul from the constraints of a mortal body, and frees the semen, both male and female, in sexual union.2 As Anthony Corbeill brilliantly put it, Liber was conceived as fulfilling the role of both the Realiser and the Liberator.3 Building on recent works that move away from a linear development of Liber in Rome as an Italic deity of subversive traits, gradually tamed in the third and second century BC through a process of Hellenisation, and considering
    [Show full text]