Comments of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Compilation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comments of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Compilation Comments of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Compilation prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 (Universal Periodic Review) I. BACKGROUND AND FRAMEWORK A. Scope of international obligations 1. Uzbekistan was encouraged to ratify ICRMW, OP-CRC-AC and OP-CRC-SC; OP- CEDAW; OP-CAT and the Rome Statute; the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its Protocol, the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, the Convention on Reduction of Statelessness, and ILO Convention 138. It was also encouraged to make the declarations under articles 21 and 22 of CAT. This year, the ILO conventions No 138 and No 182 concerning the minimum age for admission to employment and eliminating the worst forms of child labor were ratified. The Parliament ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aiming at the abolition of death penalty and two Optional Protocols to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, concerning the involvement of children in armed conflicts, on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, as well as the Protocol against Trafficking in Humans, especially women and children, and punishment for it, which is included in the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime dated 2000. B. Constitutional and legislative framework 2. In 2005, the Human Rights Committee (HR Committee) was concerned that the provisions on states of emergency do not explicitly specify, or place limits, on derogations from rights that may be made in emergencies. In accordance with Article 93 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan (p. 19), the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan in exceptional circumstances (real external threat, mass riots, major catastrophes, natural disasters, epidemics), in order to ensure the security of citizens, introduces a state of emergency throughout the whole territory or in selected areas of Uzbekistan and within three days submits adopted decision for approval by chambers of Oliy Majlis (Parliament). The conditions and procedure of the emergency should be regulated by a special law. The Republic of Uzbekistan devotes attention to safeguarding human rights in a state of emergency. On 20 August 1999 the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan «On Protection of Population and Territories from Natural and Man-made Emergencies», which establishes principles for protection of civilians in emergency situations: humanism, priority of human life and health, transparency, timeliness and accuracy of the information, preventive measures to protect against emergencies, were enacted. The Law defines the main functions of governmental bodies (central and local) to protect the population and territory at time of emergency, as well as the rights of citizens, foreign nationals and stateless persons to protect lives and health, appeal to state bodies, getting compensation for damage caused to their health during the emergency. On 3 August 2007 the Government of Uzbekistan adopted the State Program on Forecasting and Prevention of Emergencies, which aims at ensuring the guaranteed level of protection of the population and territories from emergencies, reducing and mitigating risks and consequences of accidents, catastrophes, natural disasters in the Republic of Uzbekistan. C. Institutional and human rights infrastructure 3. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) recommended that Uzbekistan consider establishing a national institution for human rights in accordance with the Paris principles. In accordance with the Paris Principles, the Vienna Declaration and Program of Action, national human rights institutions have been established in Uzbekistan: the Authorized Person of Oliy Majlis for Human Rights (Ombudsman), the National Center for Human Rights. Significant role in carrying out the control functions to ensure compliance with human rights legislation belongs to the Authorized Person of Oliy Majlis for Human Rights (Ombudsman), who promotes by means provided to her/him not only the restoration of violated rights, but also improvement of the legislation of Uzbekistan. Consideration of citizens’ applications, assisting in the restoration of their violated rights and freedoms is one of the priority tasks of the Ombudsman in carrying out her/his activities to further develop the interaction of the Authorized Person for Human Rights with state authorities, courts and law enforcement bodies in order to ensure full and effective compliance and protection of human rights and freedoms in Uzbekistan. On 31 October 1996 the Presidential Decree established the National Center for Human Rights. This body was created to coordinate activities of all governmental and non-governmental organizations, related to the protection of human rights. The Center carries out research on various aspects of protecting and promoting human rights, both nationally and internationally: prepares national reports on implementation of international human rights obligations in treaty bodies of the UN; carries out training programs, seminars, lecture courses and study tours; assists in designing and implementing educational programs on human rights; compiles and disseminates information on human rights; develops technical cooperation and information links with international centers or human rights organizations; coordinates on-site activities of international agencies providing technical assistance on issues of democratization, governance and protection of human rights; receives and considers complaints from the public on human rights violation issues. II. PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE GROUND A. Cooperation with human rights mechanisms 1. Cooperation with treaty bodies 4. Uzbekistan provided additional information in comments to the concluding observations of CESCR and CERD, on a wide range of issues. In comments to CAT, Uzbekistan highlighted its partial disagreement with some recommendations of CAT, in particular relating to the definition of torture; the request to publicly condemn torture; and the qualification of the use of force during the May 2005 events in Andijan. Uzbekistan’s comments on the Concluding Observations of the Committee Against Torture with regard to the Third Periodic National Report: (Regarding the definition of torture) We do not agree with this observation of the Committee Against Torture, because complicity in using torture is defined as torture according to Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (CC). The crime, envisaged by Article 235 «torture» of the CC, is at the Chapter «Crimes Against Justice» and subjects of this crime are the law-enforcement officers and all persons, involved in the investigation of crimes in an official capacity. Expanding the circle of individuals, whose actions are subject to Article 235 «torture», will require the transfer of this Article from Chapter «Crimes Against Justice» to elsewhere within the CC. This would affect the assessment and significance of the social danger of this act, and its compliance with the meaning and spirit of the Article 1 of the Convention Against Torture. The wording of Article 235 is performed in compliance with all rules of the legislative techniques of Uzbekistan and consistent with the purpose and meaning of Article 1 of the Convention Against Torture. 2 The role performed (organizer, executor, instigator, accomplice) in the commission of a crime does not alter the qualification of criminal act during instituting criminal proceeding against a person for committing a specific crime. All three branches of state power publicly condemned and are condemning the use of torture. Matters of strict adherence of the law-enforcement officials to international obligations under the Convention Against Torture are regularly examined on the collegial boards of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor General's Office. According to the Order #31 of the Prosecutor-General of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated 9 December 2004, prosecution bodies every 10 days carry out inspection of the legality of detention in temporary detention centers of the local internal affairs bodies. In accordance with the Order #40 of the Prosecutor-General dated 17 February 2005 «On the radical improvement of prosecutorial supervision to ensure the rights and liberties of persons in criminal proceedings», a duty of strict compliance with and enforcement of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, was imposed on the prosecution officers. All the above-mentioned orders of the Prosecutor-General are the result of consideration and discussion of these issues at the Coordinating Council of law-enforcement agencies under the Prosecutor-General's Office. Uzbekistan Government’s assessment of Andijan events in May 2005 as the large-scale terrorist act was accepted by the international community at the meetings of the UN Third Committee in September 2006. The anti-terrorist operation, which involved military and special services carried out in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (Regarding condemnation of torture) All three branches of state power publicly condemned and are condemning the use of torture. Matters of strict adherence of the law-enforcement officials to international obligations
Recommended publications
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.GAL/191/07 11 October 2007 OSCE+ ENGLISH only Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities Vienna, 9 October 2007 To: All OSCE Delegations Partners for Co-operation Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation Subject: First Preparatory Conference to the 16th OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum: “Maritime and inland waterways co-operation in the OSCE area: Increasing security and protecting the environment”, Helsinki, 10-11 September 2007 Attached herewith is a document consisting of the Consolidated Summary of the First Preparatory Conference to the 16th OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum: “Maritime and inland waterways co-operation in the OSCE area: Increasing security and protecting the environment”, which took place in Helsinki on 10-11 September 2007 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic Vienna, 9 October 2007 and Environmental Activities CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY FIRST PREPARATORY CONFERENCE TO THE SIXTEENTH OSCE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM MARITIME AND INLAND WATERWAYS CO-OPERATION IN THE OSCE AREA: INCREASING SECURITY AND PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT HELSINKI, 10-11 SEPTEMBER 2007 OFFICE OF THE CO-ORDINATOR OF OSCE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES KÄRNTNER RING 5-7, 7TH FLOOR, 1010 VIENNA; TEL: + 43 1 51436-0; FAX: 51436-96; EMAIL: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE …………………………………………………………..3 OPENING PLENARY SESSION Welcoming remarks by: Dr. Teija Tiilikainen, State Secretary (Political), Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Finland, incoming OSCE Chairmanship for 2008…………………………………………………………8 Ambassador Jose Angel López-Jorrin, Head of the OSCE Task Force, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Spain, OSCE Chairmanship ……………………………………………....10 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Religious Extremism Through Democratisation
    Message from Secretary-General As the Secretary-General of the eighth session of AUSMUN, I would like to first and foremost express my gratitude for being part of an incredible experience working with a talented executive board and organizing committee. The sheer amount of students and faculty members involved in the process of preparing these background guides is something I am personally proud of. I cannot thank them enough for their time and dedication. In preparing this document, we kept one thing in mind: To make it as comprehensive—yet as intuitive—as possible. I hope that you will benefit from reading your committee's guide as much as my team and I have benefitted from writing it. Being an AUSMUN delegate requires you to write a position paper that explicates your assigned country’s position. A delegate also needs to be well-versed in the art of diplomacy and MUN procedures. The following pages contain detailed instructions on how to write and submit a position paper, along with a description of AUSMUN guidelines and rules of procedure. I look forward to meeting you all at the conference this March. Best Regards, Omar Al Mutawa Omar Al Mutawa Secretary-General AUSMUN 2015 ii Research Guidelines Where to begin? 1. Know the United Nations 2. General research on assigned topic 3. Research country’s policies with regard to assigned topic (your countries’ views, allies/opposition, positions of allies/opposition). 4. General research on country’s background and culture (statistical data on topic and country). To learn about your country, start by answering the following: .
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional List of Participants
    SUM.INF/9/10/Rev.4 1 December 2010 ENGLISH only OSCE SUMMIT IN ASTANA ON 1 AND 2 DECEMBER 2010 PROVISIONAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS (Please submit any changes to the list of participants to [email protected] at your earliest convenience.) Country First name, family name Position Albania Bamir TOPIPresident Albania Edmond HAXHINASTO Minister of Foreign Affairs Albania Dashamir XHAXHIU Director of the Cabinet of the President Albania Ilir MELO Director of the Cabinet of the Minister Albania Spiro KOCI Director General of Security Issues and International Organizations, MFA Albania Edvin SHVARC Director of Information of the Office of the President/Interpreter Albania Ivis NOCKA Director of European Integration and Security Issues Albania Xhodi SAKIQI Head of the OSCE Section, MFA Albania Artur BUSHATI State Protocol Department, MFA Albania Hajrush KONI Military Adviser, Permanent Mission to the OSCE Albania Shkelzen SINANI Cameraman of the Office of the President Albania Fran KACORRI Security Officer of the President Germany Angela MERKEL Federal Chancellor Germany Christoph HEUSGEN Foreign Policy and Security Advisor to the Federal Chancellor Germany Jürgen SCHULZ Head of Division Germany Bernhard KOTSCH Deputy Head of the Federal Chancellor's Office Germany Simone LEHMANN-ZWIENER Federal Chancellor's Office Germany Petra KELLER Assistant to Mme Chancellor Germany Wolf-Ruthart BORN State Secretary of the Federal Foreign Office Germany Eberhard POHL Deputy Director General, Federal Foreign Office Germany Lothar FREISCHLADER Head of Division,
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Osce-Afghanistan Conference on Strengthening Co-Operation Between the Osce and Its Asian Partners for Co-Operation to Address Challenges to Security
    SEC.GAL/238/08 19 December 2008 ENGLISH only Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Office of the Secretary General Section for External Co-operation 2008 OSCE-AFGHANISTAN CONFERENCE ON STRENGTHENING CO-OPERATION BETWEEN THE OSCE AND ITS ASIAN PARTNERS FOR CO-OPERATION TO ADDRESS CHALLENGES TO SECURITY Kabul, Afghanistan, 9 and 10 November 2008 Consolidated Summary – 2 – Table of contents 1 General information ........................................................................................................3 1.1 Venue ..................................................................................................................3 1.2 Participation ........................................................................................................3 1.3 Timetable and organizational modalities ............................................................3 1.4 Agenda ................................................................................................................5 2 Summary of the opening ceremony ................................................................................9 3 Reports by session rapporteurs .....................................................................................13 3.1 Session 1: The OSCE’s contribution to capacity-building in the OSCE region and the countries of the Asian Partners for Co-operation.............................................13 3.2 Session 2: Threats to the common security and stability of the OSCE participating States and the Asian Partners for Co-operation,
    [Show full text]
  • International Organizations
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (E.S.A.) Headquarters: 8–10 Rue Mario Nikis, 75738 Paris Cedex 15, France phone 011–33–1–5369–7654, fax 011–33–1–5369–7560 Chairman of the Council.—Johann-Dietrich Woerner. Director General.—Jean-Jacques Dordain. Member Countries: Austria Ireland Romania Belgium Italy Spain Denmark Luxembourg Sweden Finland Netherlands Switzerland France Norway United Kingdom Germany Poland Czech Republic Greece Portugal Cooperative Agreement.—Canada. European Space Operations Center (ESOC), Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D–64293 Darmstadt, Germany, phone 011–49–6151–900, fax 011–49–6151–90495. European Space Research and Technology Center (ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, NL–2201, AZ Noordwijk, ZH, The Netherlands, phone 011–31–71–565–6565, Telex: 844–39098, fax 011–31–71–565–6040. European Space Research Institute (ESRIN), Via Galileo Galilei, Casella Postale 64, 00044 Frascati, Italy, phone 011–39–6–94–18–01, fax 011–39–6–9418–0280. European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC), P.O. Box, E–28691 Villanueva de la Can˜ada, Madrid, Spain, phone 011–34 91 813 11 00, fax: 011–34 91 813 11 39. European Astronaut Centre (EAC), Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne, Germany, phone 011– 49–220360–010, fax 011–49–2203–60–1103. European Centre for Space Applications and Telecommunications (ECSAT), Atlas Building, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom, phone 011–44 1235 567900. Euopean Space Agency Washington Office (EWO), 955 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 7800, Washington, DC 20024. Head of Office.—Micheline Tabache (202) 488–4158, fax 488–4930, [email protected]. INTER-AMERICAN DEFENSE BOARD 2600 16th Street, NW., 20441, phone (202) 939–6041, fax 319–2791 Chairman.—Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe Final List of Participants for the 2008 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW CONFERENCE
    SEC.INF/24/08/Rev.3 2 July 2008 ENGLISH only Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Final List of Participants for the 2008 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW CONFERENCE 1 and 2 July 2008 Vienna, Hofburg (Please note that in accordance with previous notes, the deadline for changes expired on 2 July 2008, 1 p.m. Any further comments will not be taken into consideration.) Tuesday, 1 July 2008 10 a.m.–1 p.m. Opening session Chair: Ambassador Antti Turunen, Chairperson of the Permanent Council Report by Ambassador Triin Parts, Chairperson of the Forum for Security Co-operation Rapporteur: LTC Niels Poul Petersen, Mission of Denmark to the OSCE 3–6 p.m. Working session I: Transnational challenges to security in the OSCE area Keynote speakers: - Ambassador Pierre Morel, EU Special Representative for Central Asia - Dr. Wolfgang Zellner, Director CORE, Centre for OSCE Research Moderator: Ambassador Dr. György Molnár Rapporteur: Mr. Andranik Hovhannisyan, the Delegation of the Republic of Armenia to the OSCE Wednesday, 2 July 2008 9.00 a.m.-9.30 a.m. Special guest: SACEUR General John Craddock Moderator: Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Director General, The Ministry of Defence of Finland 10 a.m.–1 p.m. Working session II: The present state of arms control arrangements, CSBMs and the Security Dialogue in the OSCE area Keynote speakers: - Ambassador Alyson Bailes, Iceland University - Ambassador Adam Kobieracki, Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs Moderator: Ambassador Carlos Sánchez de Boado y de la Válgoma Rapporteur: Mr. Valerio Negro, Permanent Mission of Italy to the OSCE 3–5.45 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe 2012 Annual Report
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Center for International Stabilization and Global CWD Repository Recovery 2012 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2012 Annual Report Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe OSCE Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Europe, Organization for Security and Co-operation in, "Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2012 Annual Report" (2012). Global CWD Repository. 49. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd/49 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global CWD Repository by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OSCE ANNUAL REPORT 2012 2012 A BUILDING TRUS NNUAL REPO NNUAL T R T THE WORLD’S LARGEST REGIONAL SECURITY ORGANIZATION From its beginnings in 1975 as a conference that helped to bring together Cold War rivals, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe has developed into the world’s largest regional security organization, working to ensure peace, democracy and stability for more than a billion people between Vancouver to Vladivostock. TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY GENERAL 6 SECRETARIAT 77 The OSCE Secretariat
    [Show full text]
  • Moldovan Headaches
    Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg Claus Neukirch Moldovan Headaches The Republic of Moldova 120 days after the 2001 Parliamentary Elections Working Paper 3 Moldovan Headaches The Republic of Moldova 120 days after the 2001 Parliamentary Elections 1. Introduction The 2001 Parliamentary Elections in the Republic of Moldova were conducted in an atmos- phere of extreme social and economic hardship. The average monthly salary in the former Soviet Republic, sandwiched between Romania and Ukraine, is around 30 US-Dollar today and the real GDP of the country has fallen to 30 percent of the pre-independence level1. Moldova, which has no natural resources and whose economy is dominated by the agricul- tural sector, has now replaced Albania as the poorest country in Europe. When Moldovans were asked in a recent opinion poll what they fear most, 39 percent of the respondents an- swered ‘poverty’. In the same poll 87 percent stated that their income is hardly enough to cover their minimum expenses and 52 percent said that they would leave Moldova for good or at least for a certain period of time2. Already today over 700,000 Moldovan citizens are said to be abroad. Ten years after independence, Moldova has become a country without much hope, battered not only by economic decline, corruption3 and debt4 but also by an identity crises. The discussions of the early nineties, on whether Moldova is a nation in its own right or simply an offshoot of Romania, have quieted down, but not disappeared altogether. The conflicts between pro-Romanian unionists and Moldovanists have made it also more difficult to create a civic identity, which would include the Russians, the Ukrainians, the Gagauz, the Bulgarians, the Jews and other non-Moldovans which account for nearly 35 percent of the Republic’s population.
    [Show full text]
  • First Committee)
    General Committee on Political Affairs and Security (First Committee) Follow-Up on Recommendations in the OSCE PA’s Istanbul Declaration Helsinki +40 Interim Report for the 2014 Winter Meeting Vienna, 13-14 February 2014 Prepared by the OSCE PA International Secretariat First Committee Interim Follow-Up Report on the OSCE PA’s Istanbul Declaration Contents Helsinki +40 Process .................................................................................................................. 2 Arms Trade Treaty ...................................................................................................................... 8 Nuclear Disarmament ................................................................................................................. 9 Protracted Conflicts .................................................................................................................. 11 Central Asia .............................................................................................................................. 16 Mediterranean Engagement ...................................................................................................... 23 Background The Turkish Grand National Assembly hosted the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly’s 22nd Annual Session in Istanbul from 29 June to 3 July 2013 under the theme Helsinki +40. The session's theme underlined the Assembly's support for the OSCE Ministerial Council decision in Dublin to launch a set of objectives aimed at strengthening the OSCE towards 2015, the 40th anniversary
    [Show full text]
  • Suplementary Human Dimension Meeting On
    SUPPLEMENTARY M E E T I N G SUPPLEMENTARY HUMAN DIMENSION MEETING ON DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKING FINAL REPORT Vienna, 6-7 November 2008 Warsaw, February 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................2 II. RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................................8 III. SUMMARIES OF THE SESSIONS....................................................................................................12 SESSION I: LAWMAKING IN A DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT: TRANSPARENCY AND EFFICIENCY..............................................................................................................12 SESSION II: ENSURING INCLUSIVENESS IN DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKING .....................................................19 SESSION III: ACCESS TO LAW ....................................................................................................................23 IV. ANNEXES .............................................................................................................................................28 ANNEX I. AGENDA ..........................................................................................................................28 ANNEX II. ANNOTATED AGENDA .................................................................................................30 ANNEX III. KEYNOTE SPEECHES........................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • OSCE Yearbook 2014
    Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy Hamburg (ed.) osC e 20 Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg / IFSH (ed.) OSCE Yearbook 2014 Yearbook on the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) • OSCE Yearbook osCe 2014 Nomos BUC_OSCE_2014_1749-1_HC.indd 1 18.02.15 08:36 Articles of the OSCE Yearbook are indexed in World Affairs Online (WAO), accessible via the IREON portal. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de ISBN 978-3-8487-1749-1 (Print) 978-3-8452-6094-5 (ePDF) British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-3-8487-1749-1 (Print) 978-3-8452-6094-5 (ePDF) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg/IFSH (ed.) OSCE Yearbook 2014 Yearbook on the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) IFSH 402 p. Includes bibliographic references. ISBN 978-3-8487-1749-1 (Print) 978-3-8452-6094-5 (ePDF) 1. Edition 2015 © Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Germany 2015. Printed and bound in Germany. This work is subject to copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law where copies are made for other than private use a fee is payable to “Verwertungs gesellschaft Wort”, Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Summary of the 25 Ngos Reports and Statements with Their Allegations About Human Rights Violation in Uzbekistan
    Comments of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Summary of the 25 NGOs Reports and Statements with their allegations about human rights violation in Uzbekistan The Government of Uzbekistan undertakes coherent measures to improve the situation in the field of human rights with special attitude to the fulfillment of its international obligations in this field. The policy of Uzbekistan in the field of human rights is implemented in accordance with fundamental principles and measures developed by the United Nations. Therefore, Uzbekistan forged close relationships with chartered and UN treaty bodies as well as with specialized UN mechanisms. Having reviewed the information provided by the NGOs one can come to a conclusion that these organizations often use inaccurate information based on the groundless evidence and rumors. Their activities, in most cases, are deliberately aimed at discrediting Uzbekistan’s Government policy in the field of human rights. NGO’s criticism of Uzbekistan’s policy is not constructive and does not stimulate further progress of the country and the society towards an effective system of human rights protection. The NGOs conclusions are incompetent, superficial and aimed at exaggerating the real situation. They do not have an objective analysis of positive experience gained by Uzbekistan. One can with confidence say that during the years of its independence Republic of Uzbekistan has created effective system of human rights protection, namely: firstly, Republic of Uzbekistan has developed its own model of gradual implementation
    [Show full text]