Innovation Bridge Technology, Startups, and Europe’S Connection to Silicon Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Innovation Bridge Technology, Startups, and Europe’S Connection to Silicon Valley Innovation Bridge Technology, Startups, and Europe’s Connection to Silicon Valley August 2017 Acknowledgments Contents This report was prepared by Sean Randolph, Senior Director at the Bay Area Council Economic Institute. Camila Mena, Research Analyst at the Economic Executive Summary ...................................................1 Institute, and Adair Rosin, an intern from Brown Introduction ..............................................................3 University, contributed to the research. Europe’s Entrepreneurial Landscape ........................5 The Institute is indebted to the sponsors that enabled the development of this report: the European Union, Startup Hubs .............................................................. 6 which provided the core grant supporting the project; Challenges in Europe’s Startup Environment ..........15 Lead Sponsors Siemens and the Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis; and Supporting Sponsors Bank Access to Capital ..................................................... 15 of the West, the Consulate of Sweden, the Consulate Evolving Trends ........................................................ 20 of Norway, Innovation Center Denmark, Lufthansa, Schneider Electric, and Tekes. Market Scale ............................................................ 20 Leaders of many government agencies, universities, Labor Law and Taxes ............................................... 21 accelerators, venture firms, and private companies, Business Culture ...................................................... 22 including many startup founders, contributed their insights through one-on-one interviews. They are listed Connections in the Bay Area ...................................23 in the Appendix. Government Offices We also wish to thank the following knowledge partners, and Cross-Border Programs .................................... 23 who provided key data that helped inform the study: Incubators and Accelerators .................................... 26 Mind the Bridge, RocketSpace, Factory, and Tech.eu. Business Organizations ............................................ 29 About the Institute European Corporations ........................................... 30 Since 1990, the Bay Area Council Economic Institute has European Venture Firms .......................................... 33 been the leading think tank focused on the economic and The Bridge to Silicon Valley .....................................35 policy issues facing the San Francisco/Silicon Valley Bay Area, one of the most dynamic regions in the United Why They Come ...................................................... 35 States and the world’s leading center for technology and What They Find ........................................................ 36 innovation. A valued forum for stakeholder engagement and a respected source of information and fact-based How They Grow ....................................................... 44 analysis, the Institute is a trusted partner and adviser to Building a Stronger Innovation Bridge ....................45 both business leaders and government officials. Through From Europe ............................................................ 45 its economic and policy research and its many partnerships, the Institute addresses major factors impacting the From the Bay Area/Silicon Valley ............................. 47 competitiveness, economic development and quality Appendix: of life of the region and the state, including infrastructure, Interviews and Informational Support ....................50 globalization, science and technology, and health policy. It is guided by a Board of Trustees drawn from Notes .......................................................................53 influential leaders in the corporate, academic, non-profit, and government sectors. The Institute is housed at and supported by the Bay Area Council, a public policy organization that includes hundreds of the region’s largest employers and is committed to keeping the Bay Area the world’s most competitive economy and best place to live. The Institute also supports and manages the Bay Area Science and Innovation Consortium (BASIC), a partnership of Northern California’s leading scientific research laboratories and thinkers. Executive Summary The San Francisco Bay Area, which includes Silicon outside Europe—primarily from the United States. Valley, is widely seen as the world’s leading center Other funding hurdles that European startups face for technology innovation and entrepreneurial include a conservative culture in both venture firms and activity, a status reflected in its research universities, large companies that frequently fail to capitalize on the its extraordinary aggregation of venture capital, its growth opportunities emerging companies may offer. high concentration of information technology and life This situation is changing, particularly in the last three sciences companies, and its track record of creating years, as more later-stage funding has become available leading global businesses and transformative business and more successful entrepreneurs have started to models. This draws entrepreneurs from around the become investors. But the gap between Europe and the world and particularly from Europe. US/Silicon Valley is still large. How and why so many startups from Europe come The other major challenge that European startups face to the Bay Area is explained by many factors. A slow is lack of market scale, as individual countries lack the recovery from the last global recession and a concern scale of the US market, and cultural, linguistic and that it is losing ground to the United States and Asia regulatory barriers inhibit the ability of startups to grow is leading Europe to look increasingly to startups—an at a pan-European level. area where it has underperformed but is seeing new energy—as a source of future growth. This activity This leads large numbers of European startups to come is concentrated in a number of major cities, led by to the Bay Area, often with support from public and London, Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam, and Stockholm; private companies, organizations and institutions. When but other cities, such as Munich, Dublin, Warsaw, and they do this, many draw on a deep infrastructure of Lisbon, also aggregate significant numbers of startups institutional support provided by their governments and and are beginning to achieve scale as startup hubs. by businesses from their home countries that are already embedded in the region. This bridge, composed of Most European governments have launched programs overlapping public and private networks, provides designed to help startups grow. While varying from European startups with short-term landing pads and country to country, these typically include tax incentives with expertise, advice, and connections that can help and some type of investment, usually in the form of them grow their businesses. Whether that happens small-scale grants and co-investment with private at a global scale, in the US or at home, most absorb venture firms. The European Investment Fund (EIF) the Silicon Valley experience, applying its values and allocates funding across Europe and also co-invests with insights to their future business strategies. private venture firms. In 2014, EIF-backed investments supported 41 percent of total venture activity in Europe, At least 35 European consulates, national technology and the share of investment directly attributable to EIF agencies, and sub-national government organizations was 10 percent. operate in the region, all or most with a focus on startups. They are joined by entrepreneurship programs These strategies by national governments and the EU run by European universities; at least 14 European- seek to compensate for the lack of scale in Europe’s sponsored incubators, accelerators, work spaces, and venture markets: while European angel investors and innovation offices; independent accelerators where the venture firms are sufficient to support seed and very largest number of international residents are European; early-stage growth, the funding pool is shallow when and European-affiliated residential facilities specifically it comes to Series A and particularly Series B and later- designed for startups. Eighteen European business stage investment. The IPO and M&A environment is organizations in the Bay Area include startup support also weak, as Europe has few markets comparable to in their programs. Major European companies have 19 Nasdaq that enable emerging technology companies corporate venture arms and 47 research laboratories to go public, and more than half of the startup and innovation offices in the Bay Area, which have acquisitions that do occur are by companies from engagement with startups as a core focus. 1 Innovation Bridge Entrepreneurs from across Europe who are working in complementary tasks are performed in the Bay Area the Bay Area—several hundred on any given day— and at home. Usually, the founder and top management share a number of key goals. One is access to venture move to the Bay Area, with strategy, marketing and in capital, particularly at the growth (Series A or B) stage. some cases R&D based in the region, and engineering A second is scaling in the US and global markets. support principally based in Europe, where most Others come because their business models are built employees remain located. Both the Bay Area and the on platforms created by Bay Area companies; many home country gain: the Bay Area through
Recommended publications
  • Map of Funding Sources for EU XR Technologies
    This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement N° 825545. XR4ALL (Grant Agreement 825545) “eXtended Reality for All” Coordination and Support Action D5.1: Map of funding sources for XR technologies Issued by: LucidWeb Issue date: 30/08/2019 Due date: 31/08/2019 Work Package Leader: Europe Unlimited Start date of project: 01 December 2018 Duration: 30 months Document History Version Date Changes 0.1 05/08/2019 First draft 0.2 26/08/2019 First version submitted for partners review 1.0 30/08/2019 Final version incorporating partners input Dissemination Level PU Public Restricted to other programme participants (including the EC PP Services) Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the EC RE Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the EC) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement N° 825545. Main authors Name Organisation Leen Segers, Diana del Olmo LCWB Quality reviewers Name Organisation Youssef Sabbah, Tanja Baltus EUN Jacques Verly, Alain Gallez I3D LEGAL NOTICE The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. © XR4ALL Consortium, 2019 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. D5.1 Map of funding sources for XR technologies - 30/08/2019 Page 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Startup Ecosystem in West Bank and Gaza
    Tech Startup Ecosystem in Public Disclosure Authorized West Bank and Gaza FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This map was designed over a map produced by the Map Design Unit of the World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other information shown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World Bank Group, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Content Authors and Acknowledgements 1 Executive Summary 2 Measuring and Analyzing the Tech Startup Ecosystem in the West Bank and Gaza 5 Measuring the Tech Startup Ecosystem 5 Analyzing the Tech Startup Ecosystem 6 The Tech Startup Ecosystem in the West Bank and Gaza 9 Skills 12 Supporting Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship 14 Investment 17 Community 20 Startup Success Factors 23 Gap Analysis and Policy Recommendations 24 Summary of Gap Analysis and Stage of Ecosystem 24 Policy Recommendations 25 Appendix: Survey Methodology and Analysis 28 Methodology 28 Short-Term Success 32 Long-Term Success 32 Notes 33 References 34 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Networking Assets 7 Table 1.2 Categories of Ecosystems 8 Table 3.1 Development Stage of Ecosystem 24 Table 3.2 Policy Recommendations 25 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Startup Growth in the West Bank and Gaza 9 Figure 2.2: Time to Complete Procedural Tasks in Life Cycle of a Startup Across Regions 10 Figure 2.3: Percentage of Female Founders Across Analyzed Ecosystems 10 Figure 2.4: Gender Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • The Bay Area Innovation System Science and the Impact of Public Investment
    The Bay Area Innovation System Science and the Impact of Public Investment March 2019 Acknowledgments This report was prepared for the Bay Area Science and Jamie Lawrence, IBM Corporate Citizenship Manager – Innovation Consortium (BASIC) by Dr. Sean Randolph, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah, Washington Senior Director at the Bay Area Council Economic Daniel Lockney, Program Executive – Technology Transfer, Institute. Valuable assistance was provided by Dr. Dorothy NASA Miller, former Deputy Director of Innovation Alliances at Dr. Daniel Lowenstein, Executive Vice Chancellor and the University of California Office of the President and Provost, University of California San Francisco Naman Trivedi, a consultant to the Institute. Additional Dr. Kaspar Mossman, Director of Communications and support was provided by Estevan Lopez and Isabel Marketing, QB3 Monteleone, Research Analysts at the Institute. Dr. Patricia Olson, VP for Discovery & Translation, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine In addition to the members of BASIC’s board of Vanessa Sigurdson, Partnership Development, Autodesk directors, which provided review and commentary throughout the research process, the Economic Institute Dr. Aaron Tremaine, Department Head, Accelerator Technology Research, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory particularly wishes to thank the following individuals whose expertise, input and advice made valuable Eric Verdin, President & CEO, Buck Institute for Research on Aging contributions to the analaysis: Dr. Jeffrey Welser, Vice President & Lab Director, IBM Dr. Arthur Bienenstock, Special Assistant to the President for Research – Almaden Federal Policy, Stanford University Jim Brase, Deputy Associate Director for Programs, Computation Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory About BASIC Tim Brown, CEO, IDEO BASIC is the science and technology affiliate of the Doug Crawford, Managing Director, Mission Bay Capital Bay Area Council and the Bay Area Council Economic Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • STARTUP ACCELERATOR PROGRAMMES a Practice Guide Acknowledgements
    STARTUP ACCELERATOR PROGRAMMES A Practice Guide Acknowledgements This guide was produced by the Innovation Skills team in collaboration with the Policy and Research team. It draws on Nesta’s reports – specificallyThe Startup Factories written by Kirsten Bound and Paul Miller, and Good Incubation written by Jessica Stacey and Paul Miller – as well as Nesta’s practical experience supporting the startup and accelerator community in Europe. Thanks to Kate Walters, Jessica Stacey, Christopher Haley and Isobel Roberts, who all contributed to the content, and to Kirsten Bound, Brenton Caffin, Bas Leurs, Theo Keane, Sara Rizk and Simon Morrison who all provided valuable feedback along the way. Nesta’s Practice Guides This guide is part of a series of Practice Guides developed by Nesta’s Innovation Skills team. The guides have been designed to help you to learn about innovation methods and approaches and put them into practice in your work. For further information, contact [email protected] Nesta is an innovation charity with a mission to help people and organisations bring great ideas to life. We are dedicated to supporting ideas that can help improve all our lives, with activities ranging from early–stage investment to in–depth research and practical programmes. Nesta is a registered charity in England and Wales with company number 7706036 and charity number 1144091. Registered as a charity in Scotland number SCO42833. Registered office: 1 Plough Place, London, EC4A 1DE. www.nesta.org.uk ©Nesta 2014 STARTUP ACCELERATOR PROGRAMMES A Practice Guide CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 SECTION A: WHAT IS AN ACCELERATOR PROGRAMME? 6 SECTION B: WHY CONSIDER AN ACCELERATOR PROGRAMME? 12 SECTION C: SETTING UP AND RUNNING AN ACCELERATOR PROGRAMME 15 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100
    2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators 1 1 2016 2017 Fintech100 Report FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators Company #00 1 | Fintech Innovators 2016 1 2015 Fintech100 Report FINTECH 100 Leading Global “ Fintech Innovators Report 2015 Company Description At a Glance Tag Line Located Year Founded Key People Website Specialisation Staff Enabler or Disruptor Key Investors Ownership Size User Engagement $ $ $ $ $ The 100 Leading Fintech Innovators Report 2016 Fintech100 Report The 50 Best Fintech Innovators Report 2014 Fintech100 Report 2 About the List The Fintech100 is a collaborative effort between H2 Ventures and KPMG. In its fifth year, the Fintech100 uncovers and evaluates the most innovative Fintech companies globally. The Fintech100 comprises a ‘Top 50’ and an ‘Emerging 50’ and highlights those companies globally that are taking advantage of technology and driving disruption within the financial services industry. A judging panel comprised of senior partners from H2 Ventures and KPMG has decided the final composition of the Fintech100 list. H2 Ventures H2 Ventures is a global thought leader in fintech venture capital investment. Founded by brothers Ben and Toby Heap, and based in Sydney, Australia, it invests alongside entrepreneurs and other investors in early stage fintech ventures. H2 Ventures is the manager of the H2 Accelerator – Australia’s only dedicated fintech accelerator – and operates out of Sydney’s dynamic Startup Hub. Twitter @H2_Ventures LinkedIn H2 Ventures Facebook H2 Ventures KPMG Global Fintech The financial services industry is transforming with the emergence of innovative, new products, channels and business models. This wave of disruption is primarily driven by evolving customer expectations, digitalisation, as well as continued regulatory and cost pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • View Whitepaper
    INFRAREPORT Top M&A Trends in Infrastructure Software EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE 7 1.1 Size of the Prize 7 1.2 The Evolution of the Infrastructure (Public) Cloud Market and Technology 7 1.2.1 Original 2006 Public Cloud - Hardware as a Service 8 1.2.2 2016 - 2010 - Platform as a Service 9 1.2.3 2016 - 2019 - Containers as a Service 10 1.2.4 Container Orchestration 11 1.2.5 Standardization of Container Orchestration 11 1.2.6 Hybrid Cloud & Multi-Cloud 12 1.2.7 Edge Computing and 5G 12 1.2.8 APIs, Cloud Components and AI 13 1.2.9 Service Mesh 14 1.2.10 Serverless 15 1.2.11 Zero Code 15 1.2.12 Cloud as a Service 16 2 STATE OF THE MARKET 18 2.1 Investment Trend Summary -Summary of Funding Activity in Cloud Infrastructure 18 3 MARKET FOCUS – TRENDS & COMPANIES 20 3.1 Cloud Providers Provide Enhanced Security, Including AI/ML and Zero Trust Security 20 3.2 Cloud Management and Cost Containment Becomes a Challenge for Customers 21 3.3 The Container Market is Just Starting to Heat Up 23 3.4 Kubernetes 24 3.5 APIs Have Become the Dominant Information Sharing Paradigm 27 3.6 DevOps is the Answer to Increasing Competition From Emerging Digital Disruptors. 30 3.7 Serverless 32 3.8 Zero Code 38 3.9 Hybrid, Multi and Edge Clouds 43 4 LARGE PUBLIC/PRIVATE ACQUIRERS 57 4.1 Amazon Web Services | Private Company Profile 57 4.2 Cloudera (NYS: CLDR) | Public Company Profile 59 4.3 Hortonworks | Private Company Profile 61 Infrastructure Software Report l Woodside Capital Partners l Confidential l October 2020 Page | 2 INFRAREPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 01 2017
    ISSUE 01 2017 SLUSH Partially melted snow or ice: ‘the snow on the ground was turning into brown slush’ An energetic gathering of world-conquering founders: ‘Despite the crazy weather, I made it to Slush and met my future Co-founder.’ PHOTO BY KAI KUUSISTO KAI BY PHOTO NOBODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD COME TO HELSINKI IN NOVEMBER That’s where it all started. Slush grew from the and Shanghai join this movement with the same idea of cultural change: creating a grassroots mindset: for startup community by the community. movement to serve the next generation of founders Not all Slushes are alike though. And now I’m not and an environment that strongly supports talking about the weather. Each city and each entrepreneurship. We wanted to create something community adds its own local flavor to the global authentic and frantic. So Slush was born, amidst network. Be it the cherry blossoms of Japan or the the dark and slushy Nordics. rhythms of Jamaica, we always like to throw some Over the past seven years, Slush has grown spices into the mix of entrepreneurs and tech. from a 300-person gathering to become a global This magazine was created to fulfill the times of community organizing more than 40 events with anticipation as we are waiting for the next Slush +30,000 attendees all around the world from to fall. I hope you enjoy it as much as we enjoyed Singapore to South Africa. It’s truly humbling writing it. to see the next generation in cities like Tokyo Marianne CEO, Slush — 4 — — 5 — TABLE OF CONTENTS PHOTO BY JUSSI RATILAINEN JUSSI BY PHOTO 08Slush Globally 2016 Startups32 & Investors The46 Next Track in Music Hustling Near and Far Touring in Europe Behind the Energy of Slush The Founder Blossom in Japan WINDOW TO THE FUTURE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Startup Factories. the Rise of Accelerator Programmes
    Discussion paper: June 2011 The Startup Factories The rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures Paul Miller and Kirsten Bound NESTA is the UK’s foremost independent expert on how innovation can solve some of the country’s major economic and social challenges. Its work is enabled by an endowment, funded by the National Lottery, and it operates at no cost to the government or taxpayer. NESTA is a world leader in its field and carries out its work through a blend of experimental programmes, analytical research and investment in early- stage companies. www.nesta.org.uk Executive summary Over the past six years, a new method of incubating technology startups has emerged, driven by investors and successful tech entrepreneurs: the accelerator programme. Despite growing interest in the model from the investment, business education and policy communities, there have been few attempts at formal analysis.1 This report is a first step towards a more informed critique of the phenomenon, as part of a broader effort among both public and private sectors to understand how to better support the growth of innovative startups. The accelerator programme model comprises five main features. The combination of these sets it apart from other approaches to investment or business incubation: • An application process that is open to all, yet highly competitive. • Provision of pre-seed investment, usually in exchange for equity. • A focus on small teams not individual founders. • Time-limited support comprising programmed events and intensive mentoring. • Cohorts or ‘classes’ of startups rather than individual companies. The number of accelerator programmes has grown rapidly in the US over the past few years and there are signs that more recently, the trend is being replicated in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovalue #Payments
    Innovalue #payments INSIGHT | OPINION Vol 7 • Q2 2014 Apple Pay: Taking a bite out of payments Christina Cordes, the start (usually merchants who already Associate accepted NFC). Furthermore, Apple announced significant bank partnerships Kalle Dunkel, with Bank of America, Capital One Bank, Associate Chase, Citi,Wells Fargo and others which together represent about 83% of the US credit Mirko Krauel, card purchase volume. Principal For now, Apple Pay is a solution for the US market only. In Europe, Apple will face more Following months and weeks of extensive speculation and leaked rumours, the new "Apple Pay is not revolutionary. It is evolutionary." iPhone 6 with its feature Apple Pay has finally been presented on 9th of September. button. That’s it. The innovation and lifestyle complex challenges. First of all, Europe is more To be frank, Apple Pay is not revolutionary. oriented Apple user base will push “their” solu- fragmented and has several markets with It is evolutionary as Apple uses the existing tion, especially in the US market where the only a low penetration rate of NFC enabled payment ecosystem and partners with estab- company has a market share of around 40%. POS terminals - at least for now. Furthermore, lished players. Also, none of the ingredients of However, a good mobile payment solu- Apple has a lower market share in a lot of Apple Pay are new but this seems to be the tion on the customer side is basically worthless European countries compared to the US. first recipe that people like and want. Obvi- if there are no POS acceptance points on the Finally, the banking landscape consists of ously, this is due to a multitude of reasons, merchant side.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding the Digital Economy 2 Digital Nation | Contents 1
    DIGITAL NATION: FUNDING THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 2 DIGITAL NATION | CONTENTS 1 Contents . MESSAGE FROM THE CEO 3 FEMALE DIVERSITY IN VENTURE CAPITAL 4 VIEWPOINTS 11 Margot James MP 12 Carolina Brochado 15 Anne Glover 19 Reshma Sohoni 23 Laura Connell 26 Sonali De Rycker 29 Leila Rastegar Zegna 33 Karen McCormick 37 Esther Delignat-Lavaud Rodríguez 41 Megumi Ikeda 44 Irina Haivas 47 Anya Navidski 51 Jessica Schultz 55 Sasha Astafyeva 58 Maren Bannon 61 Victoria Ferguson 65 Itxaso del Palacio 69 Lillian Li 72 Yvonne Bajela 75 FINDING YOUR TALENT IS OUR TALENT 80 2 DIGITAL NATION | MESSAGE FROM THE CEO 3 MESSAGE FROM THE CEO Welcome Welcome to DIGITAL NATION: FUNDING THE DIGITAL ECONOMY. This is the second edition in our Digital Nation series, which is dedicated to understanding the most important trends around VC and PE talent in the tech sector. Venture capital and private equity funding are the financial bedrock of the industry, but there’s a problem. A lack of diversity is causing issues in terms of the types of companies that receive funding, meaning they are often not truly representative of the people they are meant to serve. With technology now underpinning all our lives that is a big potential problem for society as a whole. We wanted to find out what was causing this and what was being done to address it. So, we carried out a series of in-depth interviews with a broad section of successful and inspirational female leaders in the industry, from all stages of career and background. We wanted, too, to tell their stories to show potential talent that the VC sector was open to all and is gradually changing – moving in the right direction to attract a more diverse talent base.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE 19th of March 2012 For Immediate Release : Contact Jolicloud at London Web Summit: Brenda O’Connell +33 6 14 48 31 19 Contact Press: Stephanie Lamy +33 6 74 72 58 26 Email: [email protected] Jolicloud: Defining The Personal Cloud Experience With The Launch Of Jolicloud Me London, United Kingdom – Monday 19th March 2012 - Paris based start-up Jolicloud has launched its long awaited personal cloud service Jolicloud Me at the London Web Summit today. Jolicloud Me connects, indexes and simplifies access to a person's digital life. “Our personal cloud is all the content that we publish, like or receive on all the services that we use every day. More people realize now that it's not just data; it's important pieces of our lives. Until Jolicloud Me there was no easy way to access, search and share them again.” says Tariq Krim, CEO and founder of Jolicloud “After listening to our users, we discovered that their biggest frustration was the feeling they are losing their lives on multiple competitive services. With Jolicloud Me we want to give them their lives back.” Jolicloud Me provides any user access to their content, even hidden in multiple formats and on various platforms, by offering three unprecedented features: . A Personal Search engine, which is described as “the Google of yourself” by entrepreneur Martin Varsavsky, avid user of the product. A Cloud Library, which automatically sorts all the items by media type, time or location in real time. Collections, which enables users to assemble content from different services and various formats, to share them with friends or “keep important memories at their fingertips”.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Behind ICE: Tech and Data Companies Fueling Deportations
    Who’s Behind ICE? The Tech Companies Fueling Deportations Tech is transforming immigration enforcement. As advocates have known for some time, the immigration and criminal justice systems have powerful allies in Silicon Valley and Congress, with technology companies playing an increasingly central role in facilitating the expansion and acceleration of arrests, detentions, and deportations. What is less known outside of Silicon Valley is ​ the long history of the technology industry’s “revolving door” relationship with federal agencies, how the technology industry and its products and services are now actually circumventing city- and state-level protections for vulnerable communities, and what we can do to expose and hold these actors accountable. Mijente, the National Immigration Project, and the Immigrant Defense Project — immigration and ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Latinx-focused organizations working at the intersection of new technology, policing, and immigration — commissioned Empower LLC to undertake critical research about the multi-layered technology ​ ​ infrastructure behind the accelerated and expansive immigration enforcement we’re seeing today, and the companies that are behind it. The report opens a window into the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) plans for immigration policing through a scheme of tech and database policing, the mass scale and scope of the tech-based systems, the contracts that support it, and the connections between Washington, D.C., and Silicon Valley. It surveys and investigates the key contracts that technology companies have with DHS, particularly within Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and their success in signing new contracts through intensive and expensive lobbying. Targeting Immigrants is Big Business Immigrant communities and overpoliced communities now face unprecedented levels of surveillance, detention and deportation under President Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, DHS, and its sub-agency ICE.
    [Show full text]