General Assembl' Distr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembl' Distr UNITED NATIONS General Assembl' Distr. @) GENERAL v36/s79 26 October 198I ORTGINAI,: ET{GLISH/FREI€H llhirty-sixth session Agenda iten 64 REPORf OF THE SPKTAIJ COUMTTTEE TO T}N'ESTIGATE ISRAELI PRACTICES AFFrcTING TIIE HT'}IAN RIGHTS OF THE POPUI,ATION OF TIIE OCCT'PIED TERRITORIES lbte by the Secretary-General llhe Secretary-Genera1 has the honour to transrnit to the menbers of the @neral Assembly the attached retrnrt, which was subnitted to him, in accordance with paragraphs 9 and 10 of Assernbly resolution 35/L22 C of 11 lbcember 1980' by the Special Comittee to Investigate fsraeli Practices Affecting the lluman Rights of the Fopulation of the occupied serritories. 8r-27551 0098b 0114b v36/57e English Page 2 CONTEI\ITS Paqe LETTER 4 I. 1-7 5 ORGANIZATION WORK II. OF aaaaa oaaaaaaaaaaa 8-13 7 I rr. MAIIDATE ..... ..... ............r....... r...... 14-18 8 rv. SUMMARY OF TNFORMATION AND EI/IDEI\ICE BEFORE TTIE SPECIAL COMMTTTEE ..... 19 - 389 10 A. Xntroduction . ............ L9-27 10 B. Classification of infornation ......... o r... t. 28-50 L2 I. Folicies and implementation ................... 30-38 L2 (a) @nfirmation of the existence of a deliberate policy of annexation and settlement . ... ... .. .... ...... o. 30 L2 (b) Official measures adopted to put this policy into effect ..,...... 3l L2 (c) fnformation on the implementation of these measures o.... ..... 32-37 I3 (i) Oonstruction of new fsraeli settlements and expansion of existing ones .;... o..... 33 13 (ii1 E<propriation of property to carry out construction ' and expansion of settlements .......... 34 ts (iii) Budgetary allocations to carry out construction and expansion of settlements . ..... ........ 35 l5 (iv) Other measures adopted in implementation of the policy of annexation and settLement ... 36-37 1s (d) Settlersr activities ........ .,....... 38 I6 2. Situation of civilians 39-48 16 v36/579 English Page 3 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page (a) Treatment of clvilians . o....... o. 39 - 46 I6 (i) General information ...... .....o. 40 16 (ii) lBrrclitlon and sealing of habitations and commercial pfefniSee ..o.......o."' "o""o' 41 T7 (iit) Curf€ws .... o...... ......... 42 L7 (iv) Dducation .......... ........ 43-45 L7 (v) Freedom of npvement .. 46 L7 (b) Treatment of detainees . o................. 47 18 (c) Incldents ....... o o...... ....... " " ' 48 18 3. Judlcial renedies.......,....... ....'." 49-50 18 (a) Remedies against measures affecting 49 l8 the person ................ .. " " " o .. " " (b) Remediee against measures affecting 18 PfOPefty .......o.....' ..''''' o' o''o'' o ..' 50 C. Dramples of information received by thg Omrittee .....o................"'o .."o 51 - 389 L9 1. Folicles and inplenentation ........ 5l - L84 19 2. Situation of civil'ians . o....... o. ..... 185 - 339 42 3. Judiclal remedies ...... o... ........ " " ' 340 - 389 96 v. cot]iEl|usloNs .. o.. o... o... o....... o.............. r..... 390 - 401 107 vr. AD@TION OF THE REPORI ..... 4O2 11s ANNEXES I. Map showing Israeli settlements established, planned or under construction in the territories occupied in June 1967 II. Mapr West Bank and @za areas of expropriation v36/s7e English Page 4 LETTER OF TRANS!,TITTAL 4 September 1981 Sir, the speciaL Committee to fnvestigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Hurnan Rights of the Fopulation of the occupied territories has the honour to transmit to you herewlth its thirteenth report, prepared in accordance with General Assembly resolutions concerning the Special @mmittee and in particular, resolution 2443 (XXIII) of 19 Etecenber 1968, by which the Special Commit,tee was established, and resolution 35/L22 C of 11 tbcember 1980, the latest resolution by which the General Assembly renewed its mandate. ilhis report covers the period from 25 July 1980, the date of the adoption by the Special Connnittee of its preceding report, to 3t August 198I. ouring this period, the SPecial Committee continued to follow closely the situation in the occupied territories. fn spite of the efforts of the Special @mmittee, the Government of Israel has not changed its position with regard to the Special Committee. The situation of human rights in the occupied territories has not changed from previous years. lltre lnformation given in this report shows that the @vernment of rsrael, the occupying Power, continues to follow a policy of annexation of these territories. Settlements cont,inue to be established and others continue to be expandedT the nunber of Jewish settlers in these territories continues to increase. On the other hand, the civilian population is subjected to a constant repression which takes various forms. the Special Committee has found particularly disturbing the statenent of policy of the nerd @vernnent of Israel according to which the Government would raise the claim to the "sovereignty of Israel over the occupied territories' in the near future. The SPecial Conrmit,tee in its conclusions has thus emdrasized once again the need of the intervention of the international community to put an end to this policy of annexation and consequently to the measures taken in implementation of this policy. Please accePt, Sir, on behalf of my colleagues and on my own behalf, the assurances of our highest consideration. (Signed) Ousmane cOttNDM Chairman of the Special Comrnittee to fnvestigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of , the Fopulation of the Occupied Territories His D(cellency Mr. Kurt !{aldheim Secretary-@nera1 of the United Nations New York A/36/s7s English Page 5 I. INTRODTTTION I. The Special Committee to Investigate fsraeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the bpulation of the Occupied Territories was established by the ceneral Assembly in resolution 2443 (xxIII) of 19 December 1968. By that resolution, the General Assembly decided to establish the Special @mmittee, composed of three Member States; reguested the President of the Assembly to appoint the members of t'he Special Oommittee? reguested the @vernment of Israe1 to receive the Speciat Committee, to co-operate with it and to facilitate its workg reguested the Speciat Committee to report to the Secretary-General as soon as possible and whenever the need arose thereafter; and reguested the Secretary-General to provide the Special Conmittee with aIl the necessary facilities for the performance of its task. 2. The following Member States vrere appointed on 12 September 1969 to serve on the Special Committee: Somalia, Sri Ianka and Yugoslavia. The @vernment of Sri Lanka appointed Mr. H. S. Amerasinghe, Permanent Representative to the United Nations, as its rePresentative on the Special Committee. The @vernment of Yugoslavia appointed Mr. Borut Bohte, Professor of the Faculty of Law of Ljubljana University and Member of the Rderal A.ssembly of Yugoslavia, as its representative on the Special Committee. The Government of Somalia appointed Ur. A. A. Flarah, and subsequently Mr. H. Hur-Elmi, Permanent Representative to the lJnited lihtions, as its representative on the special cornmittee. on 26 Aprit L974, the president of the General Assemb1y, at its twenty-eighth session, inforned the Secretary-@neral that Somalia had decided to withdraw from the Special Committee and that, in conformity with paragraph 2 of @neral Assembly resolution 2443 (xxlII), he had appointed Senegal a member of the Special Committee. On 30 epril L974, the Permanent Representative of Senegal to the united Nations informed the secretary-General that his Government had appointed Mr. Keba Mbaye, Chief Justice of Senegal (Premier Prdsident de la Cour supreme du sdndgal) r as its representative on the Special Committee. On 2I September 1976, the Fermanent Representative of Sri Ianka to the ttnited Nations informed the Secretary-General that Mr. H. s. Amerasinghe had resigned from the Special Committee upon his election as President of the General Assembly at its thirty-first session. On l8 Fbbruary L977, the Government of Sri Ianka informed the Secrecary-ceneral that Mr. v. L. B. Mendis, Sri Ianka lligh Oommissioner to the united Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern freland, would serve on the Special Committee at the meetings at ceneva from 22 FEbruary to I March 1977. 3. on 26 april L977t the Government of Sri Lanka informed the Secretary-General that it had appointed Mr. I. B. Fbnseka, Deputy Pernanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the united Nations, as its representative on the special Cornmittee. on 8 JuIy L977, the Government of Senegal informed the Special Comnittee that Mr. Keba Mbaye had resigned from the Special Committee and nominated in his stead Mr. ousmane Goundiam, Procureur gdndral prBs la eour suprGne, as its representative on the Special Committee. On 20 JuIy 1978, the Government of Sri Ianka inforrned the Secretary-Genera1 that it had appointed Mr. B. J. Fbrnando, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations, as its representative on the Special Committee. By a note verbale dated ll September 1979, the Government of A/36 /579 English Page 6 Sri Lanka designated Mr. D. R. Perera to attend the meetings of the Special Conmittee from 10 to 21 September 1979. 4. By a note verbale dated 23 April 1980, the Government of Sri Ianka designated Mr. Nadarajah Balasubramaniam, Ambassador and Charg6 drAffaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the United Nations, to represent Sri Lanka at the meetings of the Special Oommittee from 19 to 30 May 1980. Mr. Balasubramaniam was named representative of Sri Lanka on the Special Committee by a note verbale dated 14 July 1980. At the meetings held from 2l to 25 July 1980, Sri Ianka was represented by Mr. K. K. Breckenridge, who had been designated by a note verbale dated 18 July 1980. 5. Ry a letter dated 15 January 1981, the Government of Yugoslavia notified the Secretariat that it had designated Mr. geCir t\teholjii, Chairman of the City Commission for Ftcreign Affairs in Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina), as representative of Yugoslavia on the Special @mnittee. By a note verbale dated 10 April 198I, the Government of Sri Lanka notified the Secretary-General that it had designated Mr.
Recommended publications
  • News. in Brief
    \ \ i " • _r' - ..,," • ",,' ;,-,. _, __ 'e" __ .' •• ,1t~.fr~ii":F'~--$*';':f\~~~ ......x. _fA .~ - ~ ~.,,=~. '" ;'-'~"'~")~}.";.;'.--...,,-,,: :-)","".":': ';.:- ...:s_-:)·:~'j·::·~:;-:~~~~-";'~~E:): ,.:\_: :"""<"':"'::-' .t"::' ~,:, ,.... -:.-'':''7'.-."'. -' - , .:: it. ~, ..... ,.1<- . .,," _.'" . c.".,"';", •. , ~ .., '-, -, ',- ,. ~ ....,. 3'- . .- -... .,.. .... , -_ .. - - :-.. ~-".~-. ,..... '? '. ( :~t; .~ • , }~j,i r , . , '. 16 - THE JEWISH POST, n;ursciay. December 14,1978 ,. ..' ' . , .. -.-'" .....:. .; i . " ! '-~--""'-"-'" News., in Brief. , Jerusalem (JCNS) - Israeli security forces using bulldozers knOCked down the homes of two West Bank men, both accused of terrorist ac- tivities, '.. ,.\ , . One of the' houses, in WUwan village, north of Jerusalem,. near , , Ramallah, was owned by Akram Abdulah Rabm!lD, accused of heading ! :. a polltical assassination squad which murdered' prominent West Bank ~.,'. /' " , \ residents. for allegedly co-operating with· Israel. Rahnianwasd!1,~ined .~~t1~~i~t'~ii,<:\;~:'> r/" . I ! ~, some months ago.' ,';·,d" , ._ ..... _, ..... ,., ..: .. 'f /.,.j I The owner o{.the.,9therjlouse, i!!. a '1llagE!near Na,blus,is th9ught to .' " Oli/est and Lsrgiist'i/fnYlo4ewlsh W6Bk~1i1W"stern C~ada ',., .• '. ' Ii'® J v' 'j'; • ~ havefl¢d to' Jo~n' after three .0thEir·iJ!emhers'0( his group Were Candia lighting tlma FrldaYls":1~ p.m;' .Shabbat encis:,5:20 p.m. By mall In Western Canada $10 / ~ , .j arrested. .' ", .. , , .' ... ' ... ' '. '. ' '~.- "'.' '" ,.." Vol. UV No. 47-48 21. 1978 21 Days In Kisiev , .;:;;: " · 'Felicia Langer, the Israeli Communist lawyer, obtained a Supreme WU\~"'IPEG. THURSDAV',I?E~EIIII~ER 'b ". /'. /' Court stay on the demolitions, but by the time she notified the military authorities, the demolitions had already been carried out. , Mter the demolitions, the villagers complained to the Red Cross and . , ~. ,/ :, newspapermen, while women danced and chanted .slligansiri support of i . Yasser Arafat, the Palestine Liberation Organization.Jeader.
    [Show full text]
  • NLG Complaint to IRS Regarding Violations by the Jewish National
    March 30, 2016 The Honorable John Koskinen Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20224 RE: Violations of the Internal Revenue Laws by The Jewish National Fund (EIN: 13-1659627) Dear Commissioner Koskinen: The IRS should revoke the Jewish National Fund’s (JNF) tax-exempt status because it does not have a charitable purpose and engages in activities that violate public policy. JNF is a New York registered, § 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization that enables, subsidizes and facilitates the forced population transfer of Palestinians throughout Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory (OPT); destruction and confiscation of Palestinian agricultural land; and settler violence against Palestinian populations. In particular, JNF promotes racist policies like leasing state land “solely for the Jewish people,” thereby excluding non-Jewish Israeli citizens from access to public property.1 Additionally, JNF has allocated thousands of dunams of land for illegal Israeli settlements.2 Because these activities actively undermine any enumerated tax-exempt purpose and violate public policy, JNF is not entitled to § 501(c)(3) tax exemption. BACKGROUND AND KEY FINDINGS Article 3(c) of the covenant between JNF and the Israel Lands Authority (ILA) states that the JNF’s funds must be used “to bring direct or indirect benefit to those of the Jewish religion, race or Jewish origins.”3 Indeed, one of the JNF’s main purposes is to purchase lands upon which only Jews may settle.4 To fulfill this goal, the JNF owns 13 percent of all land in Israel, including 1 million dunams – more than 247,000 acres – of confiscated Palestinian land.5 Israel’s discriminatory land laws authorize the state to confiscate Palestinian land under the Absentee Property Law (1950) and the Jewish National Fund Law (1953).
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Torture Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1977), Pp
    Israel and Torture Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1977), pp. 191-219 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2535792 Accessed: 09-03-2015 20:14 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Institute for Palestine Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Palestine Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 66.134.128.11 on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:14:33 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SPECIAL DOCUMENT Israel and Torture [The followingthree documents are takenfrom the leadingquality Sunday newspaper in GreatBritain, the Sunday Times. The firstconsists of theresults of a specialinvestigation by the SundayTimes' "Insight" sectioninto allegationsthat the State of Israel employstorture as a techniqueof interrogationof detainees. The second documentis the replyof the Israeli Embassyin London thefollowing week to theInsight report. The finaldocument constitutes the replyof the SundayTimes Insight team to the Israeli criticisms.] 1. THE "INSIGHT REPORT," going to die," Courvoisier told friends JUNE 19,1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliyah and Settlement Process?
    Jewish Women in Pre-State Israel HBI SERIES ON JEWISH WOMEN Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Joyce Antler, Associate Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor The HBI Series on Jewish Women, created by the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, pub- lishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Of interest to scholars and the educated public, the HBI Series on Jewish Women fills major gaps in Jewish Studies and in Women and Gender Studies as well as their intersection. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com and www.upne.com/series/BSJW.html. Ruth Kark, Margalit Shilo, and Galit Hasan-Rokem, editors, Jewish Women in Pre-State Israel: Life History, Politics, and Culture Tova Hartman, Feminism Encounters Traditional Judaism: Resistance and Accommodation Anne Lapidus Lerner, Eternally Eve: Images of Eve in the Hebrew Bible, Midrash, and Modern Jewish Poetry Margalit Shilo, Princess or Prisoner? Jewish Women in Jerusalem, 1840–1914 Marcia Falk, translator, The Song of Songs: Love Lyrics from the Bible Sylvia Barack Fishman, Double or Nothing? Jewish Families and Mixed Marriage Avraham Grossman, Pious and Rebellious: Jewish Women in Medieval Europe Iris Parush, Reading Jewish Women: Marginality and Modernization in Nineteenth-Century Eastern European Jewish Society Shulamit Reinharz and Mark A. Raider, editors, American Jewish Women and the Zionist Enterprise Tamar Ross, Expanding the Palace of Torah: Orthodoxy and Feminism Farideh Goldin, Wedding Song: Memoirs of an Iranian Jewish Woman Elizabeth Wyner Mark, editor, The Covenant of Circumcision: New Perspectives on an Ancient Jewish Rite Rochelle L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Springs of Gush Etzion Nature Reserve Nachal
    What are Aqueducts? by the Dagan Hill through a shaft tunnel some 400 meters long. In addition to the two can see parts of the “Arub Aqueduct”, the ancient monastery of Dir al Banat (Daughters’ settlement was destroyed during the Bar Kochba revolt. The large winepress tells of around. The spring was renovated in memory of Yitzhak Weinstock, a resident of WATER OF GUSH ETZION From the very beginning, Jerusalem’s existence hinged on its ability to provide water aqueducts coming from the south, Solomon’s pools received rainwater that had been Monastery) located near the altered streambed, and reach the ancient dam at the foot THE SPRINGS OF GUSH ETZION settlement here during Byzantine times. After visiting Hirbat Hillel, continue on the path Alon Shvut, murdered on the eve of his induction into the IDF in 1993. After visiting from which you \turned right, and a few meters later turn right again, leading to the Ein Sejma, descend to the path below and turn left until reaching Dubak’s pool. Built A hike along the aqueducts in the "Pirim" (Shafts) for its residents. Indeed, during the Middle Canaanite period (17th century BCE), when gathered in the nearby valley as well as the water from four springs running at the sides of the British dam. On top of the British dam is a road climbing from the valley eastwards Start: Bat Ayin Israel Trail maps: Map #9 perimeter road around the community of Bat Ayin. Some 200 meters ahead is the Ein in memory of Dov (Dubak) Weinstock (Yitzhak’s father) Dubak was one of the first Jerusalem first became a city, its rulers had to contend with this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Hebron Hills: Susiya, Eshtemoa, Maʻon (In Judea), and Ḥ. ʻanim
    chapter 3 The Southern Hebron Hills: Susiya, Eshtemoa, Maʻon (in Judea), and Ḥ. ʻAnim The southern hill country of Palestine, known as the Judean Hills, is divided into three ranges running north to south: the Bethel Hills, the Jerusalem Hills, and the Hebron Hills. The Hebron Hills rise higher than the Jerusalem Hills to the north and drop steeply to the east and west.1 Unlike the Lower Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea Region, the area to the south of the city of Hebron comprised a fairly dense settlement zone during the Roman and Byzantine periods, mostly consisting of small villages.2 It is this area that the historical sources typically identify as the “Darom.”3 The Jewish settlements of the southern Hebron Hills served as the topic for David Amit’s 2003 doctoral dissertation.4 His work at the sites of Maʻon (in Judea) and Ḥ. ʻAnim was the core of the study, while the synagogues at Kh. Susiya and Eshtemoa as well as finds from sites elsewhere in the southern Hebron Hills provided the materials for comparative discussions, specifically regarding the architectural orientation of the buildings and the symbolic use of the menorah among the synagogues’ artistic repertoire. Amit’s study includes the most comprehensive discussions of the four synagogues—Kh. Susiya, Eshtemoa, Maʻon (in Judea), and Ḥ. ʻAnim—available to date. His chap- ters on Maʻon and Ḥ. ʻAnim present the finds of the excavation and therefore serve as an unpublished final report for the fieldwork. The sections on the sites not excavated by the author—Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • English/Deportation/Statistics
    International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion Proceedings On Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Palestine Written Statement (30 January 2004) And Oral Pleading (23 February 2004) Preface 1. In October of 2003, increasing concern about the construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, in departure from the Armistice Line of 1949 (the Green Line) and deep into Palestinian territory, brought the issue to the forefront of attention and debate at the United Nations. The Wall, as it has been built by the occupying Power, has been rapidly expanding as a regime composed of a complex physical structure as well as practical, administrative and other measures, involving, inter alia, the confiscation of land, the destruction of property and countless other violations of international law and the human rights of the civilian population. Israel’s continued and aggressive construction of the Wall prompted Palestine, the Arab Group, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to convey letters to the President of the United Nations Security Council in October of 2003, requesting an urgent meeting of the Council to consider the grave violations and breaches of international law being committed by Israel. 2. The Security Council convened to deliberate the matter on 14 October 2003. A draft resolution was presented to the Council, which would have simply reaffirmed, inter alia, the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force and would have decided that the “construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a wall in the Occupied Territories departing from the armistice line of 1949 is illegal under relevant provisions of international law and must be ceased and reversed”.
    [Show full text]
  • ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 8 Hata’Asiya St., Talpiot P.O
    B’TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 8 Hata’asiya St., Talpiot P.O. Box 53132 Jerusalem 91531 The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Tel. (972) 2-6735599 | Fax (972) 2-6749111 Barrier in the West Bank www.btselem.org | [email protected] October 2012 ‐ DRAFT ‐ Arrested Development The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank October 2012 Research and writing: Eyal Hareuveni Editing: Yael Stein Data coordination: 'Abd al‐Karim Sa'adi, Iyad Hadad, Atef Abu a‐Rub, Salma a‐Deb’i, ‘Amer ‘Aruri & Kareem Jubran. Translation: Deb Reich B’Tselem would like to thank Jann Böddeling for his help in gathering material and analyzing the economic impact of the Separation Barrier; Nir Shalev and Alon Cohen‐ Lifshitz from Bimkom; Stefan Ziegler and Nicole Harari from UNRWA; and B’Tselem Reports Committee member Prof. Oren Yiftachel. 1 ‐ DRAFT ‐ Table of Contents Introduction Part 1: The Separation Barrier – A Temporary Security Measure? Part 2: The Data Part 3: The Seam Zone and the Permit Regime Maps and Pictures Part 4: Case Studies Part 5: Violations of Palestinians’ Human Rights Due to the Separation Barrier Conclusions Appendix 2 ‐ DRAFT ‐ Introduction This report deals with the Separation Barrier—the largest and costliest infrastructure project Israel has undertaken since the construction of the national water carrier during the 1950s and ‘60s. In June 2002, when Palestinian attacks against Israeli citizens were at their peak, the Israeli government decided to build the barrier and termed it a temporary security measure intended to protect Israel from terrorist attacks from the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Once Upon a Country: a Palestinian Life Free Ebook
    FREEONCE UPON A COUNTRY: A PALESTINIAN LIFE EBOOK Sari Nusseibeh,Anthony David | 560 pages | 03 Sep 2009 | Halban Publishers | 9781905559145 | English | London, United Kingdom Once Upon a Country: A Palestinian Life by Sari Nusseibeh Conflicting or irreconcilable narratives mean that works which tell the story of, and from, both sides, are rare. Here are ten others which in different ways and at different times have made a significant contribution to illuminating this unending story. Storrs was the first British military governor of Jerusalem after the Ottoman surrender in December His memoir is elegantly if pretentiously written. Storrs was in Palestine at the time of the Balfour Declaration and in the early Mandate years. Benvenisti, who was born in Palestine inis one of the most astute Israeli Jewish writers about the conflict. His father was a geographer who instilled a deep love for the country in him. Rather than ignoring the Palestinians, as many Jews do, he focuses intensely on them and especially on how the landscape of his youth was transformed as Arab villages were destroyed or renamed in Hebrew. Benvenisti served as deputy mayor of Jerusalem after He was also an early proponent of the argument—from the s onwards—that the occupation was irreversible and a two-state solution unachievable. He was attacked for this, but events in recent years seem to be proving him right. This autobiography is by the son of a patrician Jerusalem Arab family. The Oxford-educated philosopher taught at Bir Zeit University in the West Bank, where resistance to occupation was the norm.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Patronage of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al Abdullah About the International Publishers Association (IPA)
    Under the Patronage of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al Abdullah About the International Publishers Association (IPA) The International Publishers Association (IPA) is the world’s largest federation of national, regional and specialist publishers’ associations. Its membership comprises 81 organisations from 69 countries in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe and the Americas. Through its members, IPA represents thousands of individual publishers around the world who service markets containing more than 5.6 billion people. Based in Geneva, Switzerland, IPA represents the interests of the publishing industry in international fora and wherever publishers’ interests are at stake. IPA was founded in 1896 in Paris by the leading publishers at the time. Its initial aim was to ensure that countries throughout the world showed respect for copyright, and properly implemented the `Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works’. The promotion and defence of copyright is still one of IPA’s main objectives. IPA also promotes and defends freedom to publish, a fundamental aspect of the human right to freedom of expression. IPA also stands for the promotion of literacy and reading and has always been a meeting place for publishers to network, exchange views and conduct business. IPA is an accredited non-governmental organisation (NGO) enjoying consultative relations with the United Nations. 01 Rewrite the Future of the Region at Amman’s Most DAY 1 Important Publishers Seminar Monday, 30th of September 2019 The International Publishers Association (IPA) and the Union of Jordanian Publishers (UJP) are hosting a first-of-its-kind Middle East publishers’ 8:00am – 9:00am Registration seminar in Amman.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground to a Halt, Denial of Palestinians' Freedom Of
    Since the beginning of the second intifada, in September 2000, Israel has imposed restrictions on the movement of Palestinians in the West Bank that are unprecedented in scope and duration. As a result, Palestinian freedom of movement, which was limited in any event, has turned from a fundamental human right to a privilege that Israel grants or withholds as it deems fit. The restrictions have made traveling from one section to another an exceptional occurrence, subject to various conditions and a showing of justification for the journey. Almost every trip in the West Bank entails a great loss of time, much uncertainty, friction with soldiers, and often substantial additional expense. The restrictions on movement that Israel has imposed on Palestinians in the West Bank have split the West Bank into six major geographical units: North, Central, South, the Jordan Valley and northern Dead Sea, the enclaves resulting from the Separation Barrier, and East Jerusalem. In addition to the restrictions on movement from area to area, Israel also severely restricts movement within each area by splitting them up into subsections, and by controlling and limiting movement between them. This geographic division of the West Bank greatly affects every aspect of Palestinian life. B’TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories Ground to a Halt 8 Hata’asiya St., Talpiot P.O. Box 53132 Jerusalem 91531 Denial of Palestinians’ Freedom Tel. (972) 2-6735599 Fax. (972) 2-6749111 of Movement in the West Bank www.btselem.org • [email protected] August 2007 Ground to a Halt Denial of Palestinians’ Freedom of Movement in the West Bank August 2007 Stolen land is concrete, so here and there calls are heard to stop the building in settlements and not to expropriate land.
    [Show full text]