DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Monitoring in the Campaign for New Local Elections on 20 May 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Media Monitoring in the Campaign for New Local Elections on 20 May 2018 Media Monitoring in the Campaign for New Local Elections on 20 May 2018 Report no. 3 5–11 May 2018 This report is part of the project "Media in Support for Democracy, Inclusion and Accountability in Moldova" (MEDIA-M), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by Internews in Moldova, aimed at promoting the development of independent and professional media and at creating a media sector that is more resilient to political and economic pressure. The content of this material is the responsibility of the Independent Journalism Center and does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or of the United States government. 1. General data Purpose and objectives of the project: Monitor and inform the public about media behavior during the election campaign and the access of the candidates to the media. The aim of monitoring is to analyze reporting trends that may affect the performance of media outlets and compromise their ability to provide accurate, unbiased and pluralistic information to the public. Monitoring period: 20 April–19 May 2018 Criteria for selecting the media outlets to be monitored: • audience/impact—national, regional; • media type—audiovisual; • form of ownership—public, private; • broadcasting language—Romanian, Russian. Media outlets and programs monitored: Moldova 1 at 19:00: public TV station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian; Prime TV at 19:00: private TV station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian; Canal 2 at 19:00: private TV station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian; Publika TV online version: private TV station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian; Jurnal TV at 19.00: private TV station, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian; NTV Moldova at 19.00: private TV station, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian; RTR Moldova at 19.30: private TV station, regional coverage, broadcasts in Russian and Romanian; TV 8 at 19.00: private TV station, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian; Pro TV at 20.00: private TV station, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian; Accent TV at 20.00: private TV station, regional coverage; broadcasts in Romanian and Russian. 2. Methodological framework The full content of the main daily newscasts on each TV station was monitored, and any items with a direct or an indirect electoral character were analyzed by content and context to determine whether they were favorable or unfavorable to a party or political entity. In addition, the items were analyzed according to the following criteria. Impartiality and objectivity/political partisanship. According to the Journalist's Code of Ethics, news must be impartial and objective and not favor certain parties/groups/persons to the detriment of others. The presence of discriminatory elements in reports and news items is a primary criterion for subjective reporting. News screening and a minimal analysis of background and context also contribute to presenting the interests of certain actors and not of the public at large. Fairness and balance of sources/pluralism of opinion. In order to be fair and balanced, news items must present the perspectives of all parties concerned, especially when it comes to controversial subjects, and must treat opponents equally. In addition, the media must 2 provide access to a variety of opinions to help viewers create their own opinions about what has happened. Language and images used. Deliberate exaggerations and obscene language such as pejoratives or labeling as well as images manipulated so that certain parties appear in a negative light raise serious questions about compliance with ethical and professional standards. The ethical behavior of journalists is most often questioned when images display aspects that do not correspond to reality, when they are simulated, and also when news stories are illustrated with images unrelated to the text. Acronyms used in the report: Action and Solidarity Party – PAS Dignity and Truth Party – PPDA Democratic Party – PD Democracy At Home Party – DA Liberal Democratic Party of Moldova – PLDM Liberal Party of Moldova – PL Our Party – PN National Liberal Party – PNL People’s Party – PP Russian Slavic Party – PRS Socialists Party of Moldova – PSRM Progressive Society Party – PSP National Unity Party – PUN 2. Monitoring data Moldova 1 Involvement in the election campaign From 5 to 11 May, public TV station Moldova 1 broadcast 29 news items on the election campaign in its main news program of the day “Mesager.” Six of them covered subjects about the organization of the elections—accreditation of observers, Central Election Commission (CEC) warning to the candidates not to use administrative resources in the campaign, civil society appeals to the candidates, survey results, monitoring by NGOs etc. The remaining 23 stories covered the campaign activities of Chișinău–based candidates. Most of those who had campaign events duirng this period appeared on “Mesager.” Impartiality and objectivity/political partisanship In general, Moldova 1 preferred not to report on the campaign information/promises of the candidates and not to ask how feasible they were or whether they contravened statements and promises made earlier by the candidates or by their parties. In other words, the journalists did not apply a critical approach limiting themselves instead to transmitting candidates’ messages in brief. The items on election promises were in a positive-neutral tone for all the candidates: Ion Ceban, PSRM about his plans in relation to doctors, social workers, and persons with disabilities; Andrei Năstase, PPDA/PAS/PLDM about the pollution of the Nistru River, real estate schemes, and doctors; Valeriu Munteanu, PL about continuing the projects started by Dorin Chirtoacă and so on. The direct activities of the candidates and statements made in their support usually were covered in short items of circa one minute that included both text and an extract from the 3 politician’s speech or from the statements made by their supporters during campaign events. The station also broadcast some news items based on the candidates’ pictures or Facebook posts, such as what independent candidate Silvia Radu did on 9 May or what Andrei Năstase said in a meeting with medical students. Reporters produced longer and more complex stories on controversial subjects. Candidates Andrei Năstase and Ion Ceban appeared the most frequently in Moldova 1 news. Independent candidate Silvia Radu was covered in two stories; PPDA/PAS/PLDM candidate Andrei Năstase in five; PSRM candidate Ion Ceban in five; PL candidate Valeriu Munteanu in two; PUN candidate Constantin Codreanu in two; PNL candidate Alexandra Can in one; and Șor Party candidate Reghina Apostolova in one (except for the ones with controversial content). The only candidate who appeared in a negative context was Reghina Apostolova, taking into account the allegations brought against her by Valeriu Munteanu (use of money from outside and promotion through concerts) and by PUN leader Anatol Șalaru (use of money from outside). The station did not cover candidates for Chișinău mayor Vasile Costiuc DA, Alexandru Roșco Moldova Our House Party, Victor Strătilă PVEM, Maxim Brăila PP, or Alexandru Mâțu Russian- Slavic Party at all in its news items which may be interpreted as this station’s lack of interest in these candidates due to their low rankings in opinion polls or to their reduced campaign activities. In covering the candidates, the public TV station had an impartial approach and did not display political partisanship. Fairness and balance of sources/pluralism of opinion In all five stories on conflicts—Valeriu Munteanu’s request to have Reghina Apostolova removed from the campaign and to declare the Russian singer Iosif Cobzon as persona non- grata; the request of PUN leader Anatol Șalaru to have Reghina Apostolova excluded from the campaign; Andrei Năstase’s notifications to a number of authorities; CEC approval of Anatol Șalaru’s request; Reghina Apostolova’s removal from the campaign—the reporters observed a balance of sources and presented the reactions of all parties involved. Language and videos No improper expressions or labeling were found in the language on campaign items. The videos used corresponded to the text; no editing tricks were used. Prime TV Involvement in the election campaign On 5 April, General Media Grup Corp. S.R.L., the holder of the broadcast license for station Prime TV, notified the Broadcast Coordinating Council (BCC) that the TV station, “…will not cover the campaign for the new location elections of mayors in some localities on 20 May 2018.” In its statement registered by the BCC on 6 April, the broadcaster also announced that it would not organize campaign debates and would not broadcast free or paid election publicity. Between 5 and 11 April 2018, there was a reduction in the number of relevant news items compared with the first two weeks of the election campaign. The station broadcast 16 items in total with direct or indirect election content in its daily newscasts. The news concerned the allegations launched by some candidates against others and the exclusion of one candidate from the election. Prime TV did not follow and did not report on the campaign events and election platforms of the candidates, except for those of independent candidate Silvia Radu. 4 We noted that many of the news items with election content were similar to the ones aired by Canal 2 with minor differences in the expressions/wording used. Prime TV also broadcast four items with indirect election content that favored candidate Silvia Radu, e.g., the ones about the lighting in the park in Râșcani District, about the repair of streets in Chișinău, and about the removal of kiosks in Chișinău. Impartiality and objectivity/political partisanship The majority of the items with Silvia Radu as protagonist were biased because information was selected to present her advantages over the other candidates. Some news stories covered Silvia Radu’s activities and statements related to her campaign while others presented her as the favorite, subtly promoting the idea of her victory in the elections.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADEPT Political Commentaries
    ADEPT Political Commentaries September-December 2004 Concerns on the eve of elections Igor Botan, 15 September 2004 Democracy and governing in Moldova e-journal, II year, no. 37, August 30 - September 12, 2004 With the launch of the fall political season analysts and media alike engaged in assessing preparations for parliamentary elections. According to their estimates, elections might be held late May or even June next year. The source for such predictions is the Constitution itself. Paragraph 3 Article 61 of the Constitution provides that "election of Parliament members will be started not later than 3 months from the end of the previous mandate or from the dissolution of the previous Parliament". Article 63 specifies that "the mandate of the current Parliament may be extended until the structure of the new Parliament has been completed and the latter can meet in full session" that according to the same article is held "within at most 30 days from election day". That is why it is considered that Parliament mandate commences on the day of its first session. Given that the last parliamentary elections were held on February 25, while the Parliament was convened on a first session via a Presidential Decree on March 20, 2001, it is expected that parliamentary elections would be held sometime during the three months March 21 - June 21, 2005. This estimation is logical and at the first glance seems accurate. Arguments cited by those who claim election date would be set for the end of May or even June cite, derive from the supposed interests of the ruling party.
    [Show full text]
  • OSW COMMENTARY NUMBER 168 1 European Integration (AIE)
    Centre for Eastern Studies NUMBER 168 | 22.04.2015 www.osw.waw.pl An appropriated state? Moldova’s uncertain prospects for modernisation Kamil Całus There have been several significant changes on Moldova’s domestic political scene in the wake of the November 2014 parliamentary elections there. Negotiations lasted nearly two months and re- sulted in the formation of a minority coalition composed of two groupings: the Liberal-Democratic Party (PLDM) and the Democratic Party (PDM). New coalition received unofficial support from the Communist Party (PCRM), which had previously been considered an opposition party. Contrary to their initial announcements, PDLM and PDM did not admit the Liberal Party led by Mihai Ghim- pu to power. Moreover, they blocked the nomination for prime minister of the incumbent, Iurie Leancă. Leancă has been perceived by many as an honest politician and a guarantor of reforms. This situation resulted in the political model present in Moldova since 2009 being preserved. In this model the state’s institutions are subordinated to two main oligarch politicians: Vlad Filat (the leader of PLDM) and Vlad Plahotniuc (a billionaire who de facto controls PDM). With control over the state in the hands of Filat and Plahotniuc questions are raised regarding the prospects of Moldova’s real modernisation. It will also have a negative impact on the process of implementation of Moldova’s Association Agreement with the EU and on other key reforms concerning, for example, the judiciary, the financial sector and the process of de-politicisation of the state’s institutions. From both leaders’ perspective, any changes to the current state of affairs would be tantamount to limiting their influence in politics and the economy, which would in turn challenge their business activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Public Policy Chișinău 2018 32(478+477):[659.4+004.738.5] N 20
    RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA ON „ODNOKLASSNIKI”. THE CASE OF REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. Institute for Public Policy Chișinău 2018 32(478+477):[659.4+004.738.5] N 20 Authors: Oazu Nantoi Alexandru Platon Aliona Cristei Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii Nantoi, Oazu. Russian propaganda on "Odnoklassniki" the case of Repu- blic of Moldova / Oazu Nantoi, Alexandru Platon, Aliona Cristei; Inst. de Politici Publice. – Chişinău: Institute for Pu- blic Policy, 2018 (Tipogr. "Lexon-Prim"). – 68 p.: fig., tab. Referinţe bibliogr. în subsol. – Aut. sunt indicaţi pe vs. f. de tit. – 30 ex. ISBN 978-9975-139-50-2 (Tipogr. "Lexon-Prim"). Editors: Hans Gutbrod & Stella Uţica Russian Propaganda on Odnoklassniki in the Republic of Moldova 3 CONTENT Introduction & Overview: Odnoklassniki and Russian Propaganda ............................ 5 The origins and the essence of the Russian propaganda in the Republic of Moldova ............................. 7 The main messages of the Russian Federation’s propaganda – the case of the Republic of Moldova .......... 10 Mapping the Odnoklassniki Network in the Republic of Moldova .............................................................. 16 Identification, classification and grouping of Odnoklassniki communities in the Republic of Moldova .............................................................. 18 The network of communities with a pro-Russian affinity ............................................................. 27 The Topics of the Russian Propaganda on Odnoklassniki .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2, Promo-Lex, April 18
    REPORT no. 2 Observation Mission New Local Election of May 20, 2018 Monitored period: April 18 - May 1, 2018 Published on May 3, 2018 Chisinau 2018 All rights reserved. The content of the Report may be used and reproduced for non-profit purposes and without the prior agreement of the Promo-LEX Association, provided the source of information is indicated. The New Local Election Observation Mission of May 20, 2018 is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and co-funded by the Justice and Human Rights Department of the Soros Foundation-Moldova on incitement to hatred and discrimination component. The opinions expressed in the public reports, carried out by the Promo-LEX Association, belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders. 2 Table of contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 4 OBSERVATION METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 4 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................................... 9 II. ELECTION BODIES .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova
    Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova March 2016 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated and analyzed by Dr. Rasa Ališauskienė from public opinion and market research company Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the International Republican Institute. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova (except in Transnistria) between March 11-25, 2016 through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ homes. • The main sample consisted of 1,500 permanent residents of Moldova older than the age of 18 and eligible to vote with an oversample in the capital Chisinau. It is representative of the general population by age, gender, education, region and size of the settlement. • Multistage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday respondent’s selection procedures. • Stage one: all districts of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups. All regions of Moldova were surveyed. • Stage two: selection of the settlements: cities and villages. o Settlements were selected at random. o The number of selected settlements in each region was proportional to the share of population living in a particular type of the settlement in each region. • Stage three: primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. • Response rate was 50 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. 2 Overwhelming Dissatisfaction with Status
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova
    Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova September 2016 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Ališauskienė from the public opinion and market research company, Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the International Republican Institute. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova (with the exception of Transnistria) between September 1–23, 2016 through face- to-face interviews at respondents’ homes. • The main sample consisted of 1,516 permanent residents of Moldova older than the age of 18 and eligible to vote. The survey also contained an oversample in the capital of Chisinau. It is representative of the general population by age, gender, education, region and size of the settlement. • Multistage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday respondent’s selection procedures. • Stage One: All districts of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups. All regions of Moldova were surveyed. • Stage Two: Selection of the settlements – cities and villages. o Settlements were selected at random. o The number of selected settlements in each region was proportional to the share of population living in a particular type of the settlement in each region. • Stage Three: Primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. • The response rate was 61 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report, Ijc, May 1
    Monitoring Mass Media during the Campaign for Local General Elections on 14 June 2015 Final Report 1 May–14 June 2015 This report was produced by the Independent Journalism Center with the financial support of the East European Foundation from funds granted by the Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (Sida/Asdi) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark/DANIDA. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the points of view of the East European Foundation, the Government of Sweden, Sida or of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark/DANIDA. 3. Monitoring Data Involvement in the campaign From 1 May to 14 June 2015, public TV station Moldova 1 actively covered the campaign: It aired 185 items that directly or indirectly covered the elections. Some of them directly covered the campaign including the activities of the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) and the activities of the candidates but also problems at city hall in the capital or at some ministries and public servants. Among the news items that indirectly covered the elections were the ones about the allowances granted to WWII veterans, the new trolleybuses to be in operation by the end of 2015, renovations to several national roads, and the negotiations with farmers and solutions offered by Parliament, among others. Objectivity and impartiality/political partisanship During this monitoring period, the relevant new items broadcast by Moldova 1 had no deviations from journalistic norms that could distort the information provided to the public. Of the of 175 news items with a direct or indirect electoral content, most presented objective and unbiased information.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova/Transdniestria: Steps Forward, Stumbles Back
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2018, Baden-Baden 2019, pp. 193-204. William H. Hill Moldova/Transdniestria: Steps Forward, Stumbles Back Introduction The Moldova-Transdniestria political settlement process achieved substantial progress over the past year, beginning with significant agreements adopted and implemented in November 2017, and continuing steadily to the time of writing in September 2018. Several long-standing practical disputed issues in the so- called “package of eight” were resolved in November 2017, most notably the opening of the Gura Bîcului Bridge.1 This key span on the main route through Moldova from the Black Sea towards the Baltic region had been closed since it was damaged in the fighting in June 1992, even after its repair in 2001. A successful meeting of the 5+2 in late November was followed by a strong programmatic statement agreed at the December OSCE Ministerial Council Meeting in Vienna, welcoming the remarkable progress achieved and confirm- ing support of all participating States for the “small-steps” approach adopted by the OSCE under recent Chairmanships. The Italian 2018 OSCE Chairman- ship continued along the same line, appointing former Foreign Minister Franco Frattini as Special Representative. Sufficient progress was achieved to hold a formal 5+2 session in late May. The settlement process continued with a high level of activity through the summer, with especially frequent, active contact between Chişinău and Tiraspol. As Special Representative Frattini visited the region in September 2018, most points in the “package of eight” had been agreed and implemented, and participants were examining how and where this remarkable progress in the settlement process might be extended.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE CAPTURE in the REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Schoo
    THE PUBLIC HAS NO OUTRAGE LEFT: STATE CAPTURE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Conflict Resolution By Ryan Knight, B.A. Washington, DC April 23, 2019 THE PUBLIC HAS NO OUTRAGE LEFT: STATE CAPTURE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Ryan Knight, B.A. Thesis Advisors: Molly Inman, Ph.D. and Alan Tidwell, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Since the theft of $1 billion from its economy in 2014, the Republic of Moldova’s nominally pro-European ruling coalition has failed to implement reforms needed to deal with endemic corruption. Instead, power has become increasingly centralized in the hands of controversial oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc. This thesis tracks Plahotniuc’s consolidation of power and analyzes Moldova’s recent political history to define the unique characteristics of corruption in a small state. ii This thesis is dedicated to Moldovans working for justice. Thank you to all those generous souls who helped along the way. A special thanks to my thesis advisers, Dr. Molly Inman, and Dr. Alan Tidwell, for their patience and support through the writing process. Thank you as well to Igor Ciurea, Stephanie Roland, and Lyndon Allin for their long hours explaining Moldovan politics, to my graduate colleagues and friends, Brian Kerr and Anna Khandros, for their help and support during the writing and research of this thesis. And to my parents, Steve and Dianne, and my sister, Sarah, for their support over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Raport 2, Cca, 10-19 Octombrie 2016
    CONSILIUL COORDONATOR AL КООРДИНАЦИОННЫЙ СОВЕТ ПО AUDIOVIZUALULUI ТЕЛЕВИДЕНИЮ И РАДИО DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA РЕСПУБЛИКИ МОЛДОВА MD-2012, Chişinău, str. V. Pîrcălab nr. 46 MD-2012, Кишинэу, ул. В. Пыркэлаб, №. 46 Tel.: (373 22) 27-75-51, fax: (373 22) 27-74- 71 Тел.: (373 22) 27-75-51, факс: (373 22) 27-74-71 http://www.cca.md http://www.cca.md RAPORT Cu privire la monitorizarea principalelor buletine informative ale posturilor de televiziune „Moldova-1”, „Prime”, „Canal 3”, „Canal 2”, „Publika TV”, „TV 7”, „Accent TV”, „Pro TV Chişinău”, „Jurnal TV”, „N 4”, „Realitatea TV”, „Ren Moldova”, „NTV Moldova” şi „RTR Moldova” la capitolul respectării legislaţiei electorale (Codul Electoral nr. 1381 din 21.11.1997, Codul audiovizual nr. 260-XVI din 27.07.2006, Regulamentul privind reflectarea campaniei electorale la alegerile prezidenţiale din 30 octombrie 2016 în mijloacele de informare în masă din Republica Moldova), pentru perioada 10-19 octombrie 2016 Metodologia de monitorizare a radiodifuzorilor În scopul monitorizării conţinutului mediatic, în particular a emisiunilor de ştiri, CCA utilizează metodologia de monitorizare a mass-media, adoptată oficial la şedinţa CCA din 29 octombrie 2010 şi discutată la seminarul desfăşurat la 21-22 octombrie la Chişinău. Aceasta reprezintă preponderent o abordare cantitativă de monitorizare cu elemente calitative. Prin intermediul indicatorilor identificaţi, metodologia permite stabilirea dacă radiodifuzorii au respectat sau nu obligaţiile legale, spre exemplu, în ce măsură radiodifuzorii respectă pluralismul politic. În scopul analizei cantitative a reflectării în mass-media a actorilor sau entităţilor relevante, unitatea de analiză este identificată ca parte a mesajului dedicat actorului politic sau subiectului selectat.
    [Show full text]
  • Elemente De Teorie a Securității Juridice a Persoanei
    INSTITUTUL DE CERCETĂRI JURIDICE, POLITICE ȘI SOCIOLOGICE ENICOV VADIM ELEMENTE DE TEORIE A SECURITĂȚII JURIDICE A PERSOANEI Chișinău 2018 Vadim ENICOV Director al Instituției private pentru integritate financiară Integral Membru al Consiliului de supraveghere al Băncii Naționale a Moldovei Născut la 30 mai 1975, Strășeni, Republica Moldova. Studii: 2014/18 Doctorand la Școala Doctorală „Științe Juridice, Politice și Sociologice”, Universitatea Academiei de Științe a Moldovei, cu Tema: „Securitatea juridică a persoanei în Republica Moldova: dimensiuni constituționale și comunitare” Conducător științific: dr. habilitat, profesor, Gheorghe COSTACHI 2009/11 Master în științe economice, Universitatea de Stat din Moldova 1992/97 Licențiat în drept la Universitatea de Stat din Moldova 1982/92 Liceul teoretic român-francez „Gheorghe Asachi”, Chișinău Activitate profesională: 2018/prez. Director al Instituției private pentru integritate financiară Integral 2016/prez. Membru al Consiliului de supraveghere al Băncii Naționale a Moldovei 2012/prez. Consilier juridic al Companiei de consultanță LegalConsult.md 2003/12 Secretar executiv al Autorității de Integritate al funcționarilor publici 2002/12 Consultant principal al Serviciului Consiliului Suprem de Securitate 1997/02 Procuror superior de secție al Procuraturii municipiului Chișinău Activitate științifică și de cercetare: Din 2014 Autor și coautor la 14 articole științifice în publicații de specialitate Din 2006 Expert cercetător în 7 proiecte de amploare cu finanțare internațională Din 2002
    [Show full text]
  • Valeriu Dulgheru
    Basarabie răstignită (15) 1 CZU 323(478) +94(478) D88 Valeriu Dulgheru Basarabie răstignită (15) Chişinău 2019 2 Valeriu Dulgheru CZU 323(478) +94(478) D88 Redactor: Valeriu Dulgheru Autor: Valeriu Dulgheru Procesare computerizată: Valeriu Dulgheru Prezentare grafică: Natalia Dulgheru Coperta: Maxim Vaculenco Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii Dulgheru, Valeriu. Basarabie răstignită / Valeriu Dulgheru – Chișinău, 2019 (Tipografia „Balacron”). 255 p., 400 ex. [Vol.] 15. – 2019. – 255 p.: fot.– 400 ex. - ISBN 978-9975-45-215-1 ISBN 978-9975-45-215-1 © Valeriu Dulgheru, 2019 Basarabie răstignită (15) 3 CUPRINS Prefaţă......................................................................................................... 5 Capitolul I. Basarabie încotro?................................................................. 7 Basarabie încotro? (1)…………………………………………………. 8 Basarabie încotro ?(2)…………………………………………………. 14 Basarabie încotro? (3)…………………………………………………. 20 Un scenariu de groază posibil…………………………………………. 25 Basarabie încotro? Dialog: prof. V. Mândâcanu cu prof. V.Dulgheru... 29 Spinoasa cale a unirii………………………………………………….. 33 Paradigma unionismului………………………………………………. 40 Unionismul devine pragmatic…………………………………………. 44 Basarabia între unionism şi „statalism”…………………………………… 50 Kamikazii unioniști……………………………………………………. 55 Paradigma dreptei unioniste neunite…………………………………... 61 Capitolul II. Basarabia în Anul Centenar……………………………... 67 Parada reunirilor………………………………………………………. 68 Războiul informatic de zombare a maselor……………………………. 75 Blestemul care
    [Show full text]