DOCSLIB.ORG

Registry Operator's MONTHLY REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Registry Operator's MONTHLY REPORT Registry Operator’s MONTHLY REPORT September 2006 Prepared: October 12, 2006 VeriSign Information Services 21345 Ridgetop Circle Dulles, VA 20166-6503 VeriSign Registry Operator’s Monthly Report September 2006 As required by the ICANN/VeriSign Registry Agreements (Section 8 for .com; Section 3.1(c)(iv) for .net), this report provides an overview of VeriSign Registry activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with text explanations as deemed necessary. The information is provided to satisfy requirements listed in Appendix T of the .com Registry Agreement and Appendix 4 of the .net Registry Agreement. Pursuant to the agreements, “…items 5 - 12 shall be kept confidential by ICANN until three months after the end of the month to which the report relates.". It has been agreed by ICANN that any additional information required under the .net Registry Agreement, Appendix 4, Item 8 will be provided on a quarterly basis until further notice. Information is organized as follows: 1. Accredited Registrar Status................................................................................................................. 3 Table 1 – Accredited Registrar Status – September 2006 ................................................3 2. Service Level Agreement Performance............................................................................................... 3 Table 2 – Service Level Agreement Performance – September 2006..............................3 3. TLD Zone File Access Activity .......................................................................................................... 4 Table 3 – gTLD Zone File Access Activity – September 2006........................................5 4. Completed SRS Software Releases..................................................................................................... 5 Table 4 – Completed Shared Registration System Releases ............................................5 5. Domain Names Under Sponsorship – Per Registrar ........................................................................... 5 6. Name Servers Registered – Per Registrar ........................................................................................... 6 7. Domain Names Registered by Registry Operator ............................................................................... 6 8. Whois Service Activity ....................................................................................................................... 6 Table 5 – Total Monthly “Whois” Queries (millions)......................................................6 9. Monthly Growth Trends...................................................................................................................... 7 Table 6 – Total Monthly Domain Name Transaction Trend by Category (millions).......7 Table 7 –Total Monthly Name Server Transactions by Category (millions) ...................8 10. Total Number of Transactions by Subcategory by Month.................................................................. 8 Table 9 – Total Monthly Name Server Write Transactions by Subcategory (millions ....9 11. Average Daily Transaction Range (In Millions)............................................................................... 10 Figure 1 – Average Daily Transaction Range.................................................................10 12. TLD Geographical Registrations Distribution .................................................................................. 10 13. Deleted Names - Per Registrar.......................................................................................................... 10 14. Restored Names - Per Registrar ........................................................................................................ 10 15. Violations of Registrar Restore Report - Per Registrar..................................................................... 11 16. Other Information.............................................................................................................................. 11 Table 10 – Total Monthly Transactions by Category (In Millions)................................11 Figure 2 – Total Transactions by Month (In millions) ...................................................12 Figure 3 – TLD Registrations Distribution September 30, 2006....................................12 2 VeriSign Registry Operator’s Monthly Report September 2006 1. Accredited Registrar Status (.com Appendix T, Item 1/.net Appendix 4, Item 1) Table 1 displays the current number and status of the ICANN accredited registrars. The registrars are grouped into three categories: 1. Operational Registrars: Those who have authorized access into the Shared Registration System (SRS) for processing domain name registrations. 2. Registrars In The Ramp-Up Period: Those who have received a password to access the Registry operational test and evaluation (OT&E) environment. The OT&E environment is provided to allow registrars to develop and test their systems with the SRS. 3. Registrars In The Pre-Ramp-Up Period: Those who have been sent a welcome letter from the VeriSign Registry but have not yet executed the Registry Confidentiality Agreement and/or have not yet submitted a completed Registrar Information Sheet. In most cases registrars are sent welcome letters via overnight express mail on the same day accreditation notification is received from ICANN. Table 1 – Accredited Registrar Status – September 2006 # of Registrars Status Current Operational Registrars 753 Registrars In Ramp-Up Period 37 Registrars In Pre-Ramp-Up Period 38 Total 828 2. Service Level Agreement Performance (.com Appendix T, Item 2/.net Appendix 4, Item 2) Table 2 and Table 2.1 compare Service Level Agreement (SLA) Requirements with Actual Performance for the reporting month. As required by the ICANN/VeriSign Registry Agreements (Section 21 for .com; Section 3.3 for .net), the VeriSign Registry is committed to provide service levels as specified in Appendix D of the .com Registry Agreement and Appendix 7 of the .net Registry Agreement and to comply with the requirements of the SLA in Appendix E of the .com Registry Agreement and Appendix 10 of the .net Registry Agreement. The SLA is incorporated into the VeriSign Registry Registrar Agreement that is executed with all operational registrars. Table 2 – .com Service Level Agreement Performance – September 2006 Metric .com SLA Requirement Actual Performance Total outage 8 hours 0 hours 39 minutes Unplanned outage 4 hours 0 hours 0 minutes Check domain average 3 seconds 3.93 milliseconds Add domain average 5 seconds 4.14 milliseconds 3 VeriSign Registry Operator’s Monthly Report September 2006 Table 2.1 – .net Service Level Agreement Performance – September 2006 Metric .net SLA Requirement Actual Performance Service Availability SRS 99.99% Year (52.6 Minutes 99.985% - (77 Minutes 2006 Downtime) Downtime YTD) DNS Name Server 100% / Month 100% Whois 100% / Month 100% Planned Outage Duration SRS 45 Minutes / Month 39 Minutes DNS Name Server Not Allowed 0 Minutes Whois Not Allowed 0 Minutes Planned Outage Timeframe SRS 0100 – 0900 UTC Sunday 0100 – 0139 Sunday – September 24 DNS Name Server Not Allowed Not Applicable Whois Not Allowed Not Applicable Planned Outage Notification SRS 30 Days General Maintenance 8/23/2006 Notice for September Outage 90 Days Updates and Upgrades Not Applicable DNS Name Server Not Allowed Not Applicable Whois Not Allowed Not Applicable Processing Time Check Domain Average 25 milliseconds for 95% 3.93 milliseconds Add / Create Domain 50 milliseconds for 95% Average 4.14 milliseconds Delete Domain Average 100 milliseconds for 95% 61.17 milliseconds Modify / Update Domain 100 milliseconds for 95% Average 50.83 milliseconds Whois Query 5 milliseconds for 95% 0.01 millisecond DNS Name Server 100 milliseconds for 95% Resolution 7.32 milliseconds Update Frequency DNS Name Server 3 Minutes for 95% 16.3 seconds Whois 3 Minutes for 95% 77.0 seconds 3. TLD Zone File Access Activity (.com Appendix T, Item 3/.net appendix 4, Item 3) 4 VeriSign Registry Operator’s Monthly Report September 2006 Table 3 summarizes the zone file access activity for the current reporting month. As required by the ICANN/VeriSign Registry Agreements (Section 21 for .com; Section 3.9 for .net), the VeriSign Registry provides third parties bulk access to the zone files for the .com and .net TLDs. Table 3 – gTLD Zone File Access Activity – September 2006 Zone file access passwords previous month 1,525 New zone file access passwords 7 Total zone file access approvals end of reporting month 1,532 4. Completed SRS Software Releases (.com Appendix T, Item 4/.net Appendix 4, Item 4) Table 4 shows significant releases that have occurred in the last twelve (12) months, in addition to planned near-term future releases, as well as other relevant information. The VeriSign Registry Shared Registration System (SRS) is continually being improved to better meet the needs of accredited registrars. Table 4 – Completed Shared Registration System Releases Complete Release Name Features Target Date Date Core Release Inclusion of an EPP Channel into 25 June 2005 25 June 2005 6.0 the SRS Optimize the ADD, MODIFY and Core Release DELETE domain commands to 19 Nov 2005 19 Nov 2005 6.2 improve their response times EPP Auth Info for Transfers / Core Release WHOIS extension added to domain 08 Apr 2006 08 Apr 2006 6.3 info command / prevent IDN co- mingling / Partial Info data Core Release Certify
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEARCH CONTENT File P3 OPTIMISATION Why Aussie Websites Are How Do Aussie Websites Missing Prime Content Fare? P10 Opportunities P9
    Edition 5, Nov 2015 BEHIND THE DOT state of the .au domain ONLINE SUCCESS Our nation’s best websites - 8 common traits p8 zone ahead A comprehensive analysis of the WEBSITE .au zone SEARCH CONTENT file p3 OPTIMISATION Why Aussie websites are How do Aussie websites missing prime content fare? p10 opportunities p9 @AusRegistry_au ausregistry.com.au Behind the Dot - State of the .au Domain is a quarterly magazine presenting .au statistics, expert commentary, analysis, industry related articles and feature stories. Publisher: AusRegistry Editor in Chief: George Pongas Managing Editor: Maggie Whitnall Regular Contributors: Maggie Whitnall, Alison Coffa, Michael Korjen, Adrian Kinderis, George Pongas, Jo Lim Data Analysis: Penelope Green Account Management and Circulation: Courtney Fabian Creative Director: Michelle O’Reilly ____________ Advertising Sales: [email protected] Contents DEPARTMENTS CHARTS & TABLES Under the Microscope ........................................................................1 .au Domains Under Management .......................................................1 An overview of the number of .au domains currently under .au Monthly Creates ............................................................................1 management (open 2LDs), monthly registrations, renewals by age of domain and APTLD statistics. Renewal Rates by Domain Age ...........................................................2 .au Research and Surveys ....................................................................2 Domain Numbers
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Protecting the Integrity of the Internet
    7 Protecting the Integrity of the Internet Introduction 7.1 This chapter discusses current and future initiatives for promoting a more secure Internet environment. In particular, it considers the role of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), and Domain Name Registrars and Resellers in promoting greater resilience within the Australian Internet networks. 7.2 The chapter focuses on six key issues: the effectiveness of the Australian Internet Security Initiative (AISI) to detect and drive the remediation of bots; the role of ISPs in the AISI and the proposed Internet industry e- security code of practice; remediation of infected computers; ACMA‟s capacity to respond to the threat of compromised websites; ACMA‟s spam reporting initiative and the role of ISPs under the Spam Code of Practice; and e-security and the Domain Name Registration System. Australian Internet Security Initiative 7.3 The ACMA is a statutory authority within the Australian Government portfolio of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. The 128 HACKERS, FRAUDSTERS AND BOTNETS: TACKLING THE PROBLEM OF CYBER CRIME ACMA is responsible for regulating broadcasting, the Internet, radio communications and telecommunications.1 7.4 The ACMA developed the AISI in 2005. The AISI identifies computers operating on the Australian Internet that have been infected by malware and are able to be controlled for illegal activities.2 The Committee was told that AISI has been progressively expanded over time and has attracted international interest.3 7.5 As noted previously in this report, 99 per cent of spam is sent from botnets.4 Spam email is one of the primary vectors of malware and the dissemination of scams and phishing attacks on end users.
    [Show full text]
  • 도메인 관련 국제동향 보고서 (4/4분기 : 2004년 10월∼12월)
    도메인 관련 국제동향 보고서 (4/4분기 : 2004년 10월∼12월) 2005. 1. 한국인터넷진흥원 인터넷정보센터 목 차 Ⅰ. 세계 도메인이름 등록 현황 ··································································3 1. 전체 현황 ········································································································ 3 2. OECD 가입국 등 ccTLD 등록 현황 ························································· 4 3. 주요 gTLD 현황(출처: http://webhosting.info, 2005. 1) ···················· 7 Ⅱ. ccTLD 현황 ······························································································10 1. Asia & Pacific 지역 ····················································································· 10 ＊ 'i.ph'(필리핀) 익명으로 도메인이름 등록 가능 ············································ 10 ＊ 아랍 에미리트 연합(UAE), 아랍어 도메인 등록을 위한 프로젝트 진행 10 ＊ 동티모르 ccTLD 변경(TP -> TL) ···································································· 10 ＊ 팔레스타인 ccTLD(.PS) 등록 개방 ·································································· 10 ＊ .NR(나우루) 도메인 등록 개시 ········································································ 11 ＊ 팔라우 국가도메인 PW도메인 등록 개시 ······················································ 11 2. Europe 지역 ··································································································· 11 ＊ .de 도메인 등록 건수, 800만건 달성 ······························································ 11 ＊ EURid, European Commisison과 계약 체결 완료 ···································· 12 ＊ 그리스 도메인이름(.GR) 등록에 있어 몇가지 쟁점사항 ····························· 13 ＊ Nominet(영국), me.uk 등록자격 변경 ···························································
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Internet Alert 135 Updated List of Country Registrat…
    Outline of Restrictions1 Country Web Site of Registration Restrictions on Person or Entity who Restriction on Type of Restrictions on Authority2 may register Domain Name Number of Domain Names American http://www.nic.as No Must have active use3. No Samoa Armenia https://www.amnic.net No, although there is a higher fee for No No non-residents Australia http://www.melbourneit.com.au Only commercial activities registered No For "com.au" 1 per and trading in Australia can register a entity or per registered .com.au name. commercial name; all No restrictions on other second level others unlimited domains. Austria http://www.nic.at No No No Belgium http://www.dns.be No No No Bolivia http://www.nic.bo No No No Brazil http://www.nic.br Entities4 registered5 in Brazil No 10 per entity or person Foreign countries having an attorney-in- fact duly established in Brazil and planning to establish a branch in Brazil within a period of twelve months Brazilian citizens Canada http://www.cira.ca Entities registered in Canada Trademark owners may No register only a name which Owners of trademarks registered in consists of or includes the Canada exact word component of Canadian citizens and permanent the registered trademark residents Cayman http://www.nic.ky Entities registered in the Cayman No No Islands Islands Caymanian citizens and permanent residents Chile http://www.nic.cl No, but administrative contact resident No No BOSTON 1426316v1 Country Web Site of Registration Restrictions on Person or Entity who Restriction on Type of Restrictions on Authority2
    [Show full text]
  • Registry Operator's Report
    REGISTRY OPERATOR’S REPORT July 2007 Afilias Limited Monthly Operator Report – July 2007 As required by the ICANN/Afilias Limited Registry Agreement (Section 3.1(c)(iv)) this report provides an overview of Afilias Limited activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with text explanations as deemed necessary. Information is provided in order as listed in Appendix 4 of the Registry Agreement. Report Index Section 1 Accredited Registrar Status Section 2 Service Level Agreement Performance Section 3 INFO Zone File Access Activity Section 4 Completed SRS/System Software Releases Section 5 WhoIs Service Activity Section 6 Total Number of Transactions by Subcategory by Month Section 7 Daily Transaction Range Copyright © 2001-2007 Afilias Limited Page 2 of 9 Afilias Limited Monthly Operator Report – July 2007 Section 1 – Accredited Registrar Status – July 2007 The following table displays the current number and status of the ICANN accredited registrars. The registrars are grouped into three categories: 1.Operational registrars: Those who have authorized access into the Shared Registration System (SRS) for processing domain name registrations. 2.Registrars in the Ramp-up Period: Those who have received a password to the Afilias Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) environment. The OT&E environment is provided to allow registrars to develop and test their systems with the SRS. 3.Registrars in the Pre-Ramp-up Period: Those who have been sent a welcome letter from Afilias, but have not yet executed the Registry Confidentiality Agreement and/or have not yet submitted a completed Registrar Information Sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications
    COMMUNICATIONS DAY 25 June 2018 All you need to know in telecoms ISSUE 5637 Afilias rolls out state-based domain infrastructure ahead of registry transition on June 30 Incoming domain name registry provider Ailias is this week inalising a series of new state- based infrastructure to support Australia’s .au domain network. It plans to transition to the new DNS infrastructure, which will be used by more than 3.1 mil- lion .au domain names, this coming weekend. Ailias was appointed to take over the running of the country's registry services in December as part of domain administrator auDA's Registry Transformation Project. The services had previ- ously been operated by Neustar/AusRegistry for more than 15 years. Ailias Australia operations manager Patrick Donaldson told CommsDay that the new system had undergone signiicant testing for the past six weeks with a range of stakeholders. He also noted that the company had done 24 previous transitions in countries around the world, includ- ing the .org global domain. Under the previous .au registry operation, nameservers to direct trafic to the correct .au web site were only located in Melbourne or Sydney. Ailias has been working to expand the number of nodes to eight, with one in each state or territory. The cost of the upgrade is $250,000 and according to Donaldson will add resilience, perfor- mance beneits and increased security. DNS IS INTERNET’S HEART: “DNS infrastructure is the heart of the internet’s ability to locate what you need and deliver it to your screen. This is why it is important to have new equipment designed to address today’s reliability, resilience and security challenges,” Donaldson said.
    [Show full text]
  • ARI Registry Services Company Background
    ARI Registry Services Company Background ARI Registry Services is a wholly owned subsidiary of AusRegistry Pty Ltd, the company that has been the TLD Registry provider for Australia’s country code TLD, .au, since 2002. Taking our business and expertise to the global audience, ARI Registry Services commenced operations to leverage the DNS and TLD Registry system expertise and infrastructure built in the parent company, and to provide a platform for innovative usage of this technology in the provision of ‘World’s Best Practice’ TLD Registry Services to clients internationally. AusRegistry has built a world's best practice Domain Name registry utilising the industry- standard EPP interface and hardware from leading vendors including IBM, Oracle and Cisco. All areas of auDA's technical specifications have been complied with or, in many cases, exceeded especially in the areas of security, stability. Chris Dispain, CEO - auDA ARI Registry Services is a proven specialist in the development and deployment of TLD Registry systems and accompanying policies and procedures. Our comprehensive program ensures technical excellence and guaranteed results. In addition, ARI Registry Services: Has been an active contributor to Internet policy development and implementation for over 10 years, Has been an Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Accredited Registrar since 2001, Is a Domain Name Industry expert frequently requested to present on a wide range of technical and administrative topics at conferences around the world, and Is a trusted consultant to a number of government entities on best practice TLD operations and the criticality of the Internet and the DNS. International Experience ARI Registry Services also has extensive international TLD Registry experience currently operating several TLD Registries across the globe and is the trusted provider for multinational enterprises and international governments alike.
    [Show full text]
  • About .Au, Chris Wright, Ausregistry
    All about .au Chris Wright CTO ‐ AusRegistry International ICANN no. 35, Sydney, Australia 22nd June 2009 AusRegistry International • Located in Melbourne, Australia – Involved in Domain Name Industry since 1999 – ICANN Accredited Registrar since 2000 – .au Registry Operator since 2002 • Domain Name Registry Services – Registry Systems and Software Provider – Consultancy Services – Our software and consultancy services have been used by several other TLDs including some soon to be IDN enabled ccTLDs An overview of .au A brief History of .au Originally delegated to Melbourne University Second level names delegated to differing entities e.g. com.au to Melbourne IT auDA formed AusRegistry won tender as technical operator auDA / AusRegistry ever since The Industry Model The Industry Model Growth of au • 2002 ‐ 250,000 names • 2009 ‐ > 1.4 million • Continued growth of ~25% a year Our Registry System • Standard Registry/Registrar model • EPP Registration System • Web Interface (Registry Portal) • WHOIS • DNS • Etc. Design Principals • High availability (100% uptime) • Geographically distributed redundancy • Ease of maintenance • Industry standard platforms • High performance • Equal access • Standards Compliant Best of Breed Components • Hardware – Intel x86_64 hardware – IBM SAN storage – Cisco & F5 networking equipment • Software – Redhat Enterprise Linux – Oracle Database • Unsurpassed high availability options – BIND DNS – Sun Java Systems Web Server Best of Breed Registry Software • Been developed and improved for over 9 years • Developed In‐house – C++ Registry daemons – Java Web Application Portal – Toolkits in Java, Perl and C++ – Optimised for Linux – Optimised for Oracle • Now used by other Registries world wide and is available to be licensed The Registry System Some other stats • 30 accredited Registrars • Maintaining consistently 70+ EPP connections • Process over 5 million EPP transactions a day – Average over 57 EPP TPS – On par with .info and .biz – ~ 90% are read only A few specific examples..
    [Show full text]
  • The Domain Name Authority Google Tlds
    DomainSherpa.com: The Domain Name Authority Google TLDs, Their New Registar and Their Army of Developers Watch the full video at: http://www.domainsherpa.com/google-io-2014/ 0:04 BEN FRIED: Good afternoon. 0:06 Who cares about new domain names? 0:08 The short answer is we think you should. 0:12 And we certainly do, too And actually, this 0:15 is the most important, and I think 0:18 an exciting change, in the internet in a long, long time, 0:21 maybe since the beginning of the modern internet 0:23 as we knew it, at least as users will experience it. 0:26 And we are incredibly excited about this. 0:28 And if that is not enough, if our excitement and the changes 0:31 in the internet aren't enough to get you excited, 0:33 we're going to give each and every one of you 0:35 a free domain name registration to use soon, 0:41 as part of our new domain registrar business. 0:43 So hang on till the end to learn more about that. 0:44 I hope that that helps excite you 0:45 about the topic a little bit. 0:50 Yay! 0:51 Free! 0:51 Free is good! 0:53 Domain names actually cost more than t-shirts, even in bulk. 0:56 So you're getting a good deal. 0:58 [AUDIENCE LAUGHTER] 1:00 I'm Ben. 1:00 Ben Fried. 1:01 I'm Google's chief information officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on International Desk Research
    Report prepared for Consultancy study on the Institutional Framework and Corporate Governance for the Administration of Internet Domain Names in Hong Kong Deliverable 3 (Part I): Report on international desk research Gov3 limited | 83 Victoria Street | London | SW1H OHW | UK | www.gov3.net CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Part I: Cross-country Overview 1 Introduction 6 Background 6 From “best practice” to “international practices mapping” 8 Structure of the report 9 2. Governance and government 11 Governance versus Government in general 11 Governance versus Government in the ccTLD best practice debate 13 Government role in ccTLD management: desk research findings 17 3 Synthetic overview of desk research findings 22 Organisational structure 22 Policy priorities 24 Governance processes 24 Operational practices 28 Forward orientation 33 4 International practices mapping 35 Policy priorities, organisational type, and government control matrixes 35 Governance matrixes 39 Operational practices matrixes 41 5 Conclusive Considerations 48 Part II: Country Reports (see separate document) 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the report on the findings of the international desk research activity, during which we have used web-based research, and a trawl of relevant published academic and market research, to pull together an assessment of the current state of domain name registration in the agreed list of 13 selected countries: Australia, China, Finland, France, Germany, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK and the US. The report is in two main parts: Part I, which synthesises our key findings across all the countries; and Part II, which examines each country in turn against a common analytical framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East and Adjoining Countries DNS Study
    Middle East and Adjoining Countries DNS Study Document Reference ICANN/ME-DNS/003 Protective Marking COMMERCIAL - IN CONFIDENCE Document Owner EURid Status FINAL Publication Date 25 Jan 2016 Latest review date 22 Feb 2016 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 7 Understanding the region’s Internet environment ..................................................................... 7 The region’s domain name industry: registries, registrars and registrants ................................ 8 Domains in the region – facts and figures ................................................................................. 9 Analysis of the market potential for domains in the region ...................................................... 10 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 10 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 12 Research methodology ........................................................................................................... 13 User survey ............................................................................................................................. 13 Observations on methodology and potential
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Internet Usability – a Framework for Domain Name Policy Evaluation
    Improving Internet Usability – A Framework For Domain Name Policy Evaluation By Joshua Rowe B. App. Sci. (Comp. Sci.) School of Business Information Technology Faculty of Business October 2008 DomainUsability.com A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of eBusiness from RMIT University Improving Internet Usability – A Framework For Domain Name Policy Evaluation Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; and, any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged. __________________________ Joshua Luke Rowe Dated Saturday, 25 October 2008 ii Improving Internet Usability – A Framework For Domain Name Policy Evaluation Copyright Licence I hereby grant to the RMIT University or its agents the right to archive and to reproduce and communicate to the public my thesis or appropriate durable record in whole or in part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain ownership of copyright and all other proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis. __________________________ Joshua Luke Rowe Dated Saturday, 25 October 2008 iii Improving Internet Usability – A Framework For Domain Name Policy Evaluation Acknowledgements Internet co-inventors such as Vint Cerf, Tim Berners-Lee and Ray Tomlinson provided me with the canvas on which I could begin my professional career that has centred on the commercial use of the Internet.
    [Show full text]