Floral Anthesis Rate and Pollen Limitation in Delphinium Glaucum and Their Consequences for Female Fitness

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Floral Anthesis Rate and Pollen Limitation in Delphinium Glaucum and Their Consequences for Female Fitness University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2016 Floral Anthesis Rate and Pollen Limitation in Delphinium glaucum and their Consequences for Female Fitness Cameron-Inglis, Hazel Cameron-Inglis, H. (2016). Floral Anthesis Rate and Pollen Limitation in Delphinium glaucum and their Consequences for Female Fitness (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26188 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2980 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Floral Anthesis Rate and Pollen Limitation in Delphinium glaucum and their Consequences for Female Fitness by Hazel Letitia Cameron-Inglis A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA MAY, 2016 © Hazel Letitia Cameron-Inglis 2016 Abstract Phenological mismatch between plants and their pollinators and/or interspecific competition for pollination can cause insufficient pollen quantity and/or inadequate pollen quality to limit seed production and siring. Inflorescence display size, a dynamic part of pollinator attraction, influences pollinator behaviour and movement. Thus, a rapid increase in display size as plants begin flowering caused by initially rapid flower anthesis should promote recruitment of pollinators to newly flowering individuals and species. Tests of two assumptions of this hypothesis for Delphinium glaucum revealed: 1) declining anthesis rate during a plant’s flowering period is an intrinsic characteristic of inflorescence architecture, rather than a response to internal resource economy; and 2) pollinator limitation early during the flowering period reduced ovule fertilization and elevated autogamous self-mating. These results suggest that rapidly increasing initial display size largely contributed to the quality, rather than the quantity of female mating. Consequences for male outcross success remain to be assessed. ii Acknowledgements “It takes a village” is a proverb expressing the belief that it takes a community of people to raise a child. I draw a parallel here in that this thesis would not have come to fruition without the guidance, aid and friendship of many people both within and outside of the academic community. This thesis is the culmination of some of the most challenging and rewarding years of my life. Thank-you to everyone who has helped me along this journey. In particular, I am profoundly grateful to my supervisor, Dr. Lawrence Harder, for his guidance and support. Lawrence has challenged, inspired and trained me to think carefully and critically, to write and speak precisely, to interact with others kindly and patiently, and to conduct and assess research objectively. Thank you Lawrence, for the opportunities you have given me and for your valued mentorship. Additionally, I am indebted to my supervisory committee members, Dr. Sean Rogers and Dr. Mary Reid, as well as other professionals, for their contributions to my research. Sean and Mary, along with my external examiner, Dr. David Goldblum contributed insightful comments and advice on my writing and/or research. Moreover, Sean shared lab space, equipment, and molecular knowledge; Dr. Ed Yeung allowed me to use his equipment for pollen enumeration; John Swann aided with insect identification; John Buckley erected an electric fence around my study plants; and the Biogeoscience Institute supplied weather data from the Barrier Lake Research Station. Many thanks are also owed to my lab mates, fellow students and lab collaborators for their assistance and social support. Dr. Mason Kulbaba and Dr. Wan-Jin Liao developed DNA extraction protocols and/or Delphinium glaucum microsatellites used in iii this study. Further, Mason gallantly mentored me on molecular techniques and boosted my morale during troublesome field and lab work. Caitlin Tomaszewski tirelessly and cheerfully assisted me with seed and pollen enumeration and DNA extractions. Dr. Takashi Ida shared plant community phenology data for my study population. Lauren Sawich was a motivating force of reassurance and cheer throughout the analysis and writing process. These individuals, along with other current and past lab members: Illona Clocher, Lisa O’Donnell, David Robinson, and Paul Simpson, shared valuable information, resources, feedback or encouragement. Similarly, I am grateful to several individuals outside my lab: Ella Bowles, Brandon Allen, Stevi Vanderzwan, Leanna Lachowsky, Yan Liu, Sam Robinson and Riley Waytes, for friendly and illuminating conversations relating to pollination, evolution, or molecular techniques. Above all, I am extremely thankful for my friends and family. My friends Robin Butler, Erin Leson and Jon Pellett maintained my sanity and focus by providing encouragement, empathy and creative distractions. My parents, Evelyn and Gordon, and my in-laws, Mike and Audrey, steadfastly supported me emotionally and materially. My wonderful children, Erik and Jamie, understandingly sacrificed their time with me during long field, lab and writing days. And my partner in life, love and eclectic hobbies, Joel Antler, supported me daily by selflessly providing for our needs, constructively listening to my thoughts, wittily encouraging me to laugh, and patiently reminding me to breathe. Finally, the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada funded this research through Dr. Lawrence Harder’s Discovery and Accelerator Grants and through my Postgraduate Scholarship M Award. iv Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures and Illustrations ....................................................................................... viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................1 1.1 Pollinator attraction, floral display dynamics and their contributions to plant mating ......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Pollinator limitation and interspecific competition for pollination services ..............5 1.3 Objectives ..................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER TWO: PHENOLOGICAL MISMATCH BETWEEN A PLANT AND ITS POLLINATORS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR SEED PRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................9 2.2 Materials and Methods .............................................................................................12 2.2.1 Study species and site ......................................................................................12 2.2.2 Display dynamics ............................................................................................14 2.2.3 Pollen, seed and plant enumeration .................................................................15 2.2.4 Pollinator visitation .........................................................................................16 2.2.5 Herbivory .........................................................................................................17 2.2.6 Data analysis ....................................................................................................18 2.3 Results ......................................................................................................................20 2.3.1 Pollinators ........................................................................................................20 2.3.2 Phenologies ......................................................................................................20 2.3.3 Pollen receipt and potential donors .................................................................22 2.3.4 Reproductive output ........................................................................................23 2.4 Discussion ................................................................................................................27 2.4.1 Phenological mismatch ....................................................................................27 2.4.2 Limits on seed production ...............................................................................28 CHAPTER THREE: DO ARCHITECTURAL EFFECTS OR RESOURCE DEPLETION GOVERN DECLINING ANTHESIS RATES WITHIN INFLORESCENCES? ..............................................................................................31
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Larkspur Poisoning: Toxicology and Alkaloid Structure–Activity Relationshipsଝ K.E
    Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 30 (2002) 113–128 www.elsevier.com/locate/biochemsyseco Larkspur poisoning: toxicology and alkaloid structure–activity relationshipsଝ K.E. Panter a,*, G.D. Manners b, B.L. Stegelmeier a, S. Lee a, D.R. Gardner a, M.H. Ralphs a, J.A. Pfister a, L.F. James a a USDA-ARS Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, 1150 E. 1400 N., Logan, UT 84341, USA b USDA-ARS Western Regional Research Center, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA Received 4 January 2001; accepted 1 May 2001 Abstract Systematic approaches to taxonomic classifications of the tall larkspur spp. have been developed using traditional chemical methods to profile alkaloids, comparison of relative tox- icity of individual alkaloids, plant morphology/taxonomy and molecular genetics. Using these methods (papers published in this series) toxicology of three distinct species of tall larkspurs including Delphinium glaucum, Delphinium barbeyi and Delphinium occidentale is described. Tall larkspurs (Delphinium spp.) continue to be the most serious cause of cattle losses on mountain rangelands in the western US. Over 40 norditerpenoid alkaloids have been reported in species of larkspurs and toxicology data on 25 of these have been reported by the authors. These alkaloids can be classified into three general types based on their structural character- istics and toxicity: the N-(methylsuccinyl) anthranoyllycoctonine (MSAL)-type, having high toxicity; the lycoctonine-type, with moderate toxicity; and the 7,8-methylenedioxylycoctonine (MDL)-type, of low toxicity. The structural importance of the methylsuccinimido anthranilic acid ester group at the C18 position is evident in the high toxicity of MSAL alkaloids, parti- cularly methyllycaconitine (MLA), Nudicauline (NUD) and 14-deacetylnudicauline (14-DAN).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a List of Preparers and Reviewers
    Glossary adfluvial —Referring to fish that live in lakes and no significant impact, aids an agency’s compliance migrate to rivers and streams. with the National Environmental Policy Act when Beyond the Boundaries —National Wildlife Refuge no environmental impact statement is necessary, Association program to expand conservation work and facilitates preparation of a statement when to areas outside national wildlife refuge borders. one is necessary. BRWCA —Bear River Watershed Conservation Area. fluvial —Referring to fish that live in rivers and candidate species —A species of plant or animal for streams. which the USFWS has sufficient information on GCN —(A species of) greatest conservation need. their biological status and threats to propose them HAPET —Habitat and Population Evaluation Team. as endangered or threatened under the Endan- Important Bird Areas Program —A global effort to gered Species Act, but for which development of find and conserve areas that are vital to birds a proposed listing regulation is precluded by other and other biodiversity sponsored by the National higher priority listing activities. Audubon Society. CFR —Code of Federal Regulations. Intermountain West Joint Venture —Diverse partner- CO2 —Carbon dioxide. ship of 18 entities including Federal agencies, conservation easement —A legally enforceable State agencies, nonprofit conservation organiza- encumbrance or transfer of property rights to a tions, and for-profit organizations representing government agency or land trust for the purposes agriculture and industry. IWJV was founded in of conservation. Rights transferred could include 1994 to facilitate bird conservation across the vast the discretion to subdivide or develop land, change 495 million acres of the Intermountain West.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining and Improving Habitat for Hummingbirds in Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota
    United States Department of Agriculture Maintaining and Improving Habitat for Hummingbirds in Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota A Land Manager’s Guide Forest Service National Headquarters Introduction Food Hummingbirds play an important role in the food web, Hummingbirds feed by day on nectar pollinating a variety of owering plants, some of which from owers, including annuals, perenni- are speci cally adapted to pollination by hummingbirds. als, trees, shrubs, and vines. Native nectar Some hummingbirds are at risk, like other pollinators, plants are listed in the table near the end due to habitat loss, changes in the distribution and of this guide. ey feed while hovering or, abundance of nectar plants (which are a ected by climate if possible, while perched. ey also eat change), the spread of invasive plants, and pesticide use. Rufous Hummingbird nest insects, such as fruit- ies and gnats, and is guide is intended to help you provide and improve Courtesy of Martin Hutten will consume tree sap, when it is available. habitat for hummingbirds, as well as other pollinators, ey obtain tree sap from sap wells drilled in Colorado, Wyoming, and South Dakota. While hummingbirds, like all birds, have the in trees by sapsuckers and other hole-drill- Western columbine—Aquilegia formosa Courtesy of Gary A. Monroe basic habitat needs of food, water, shelter, and space, this guide is focused on providing ing birds. USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database food—the plants that provide nectar for hummingbirds. Because climate, geology, and vegetation vary widely in di erent areas, speci c recommendations are presented for each ecoregion in Colorado, Wyoming, and South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumble Bee Surveys in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area of Oregon and Washington
    Bumble Bee Surveys in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area of Oregon and Washington Final report from the Xerces Society to the U.S. Forest Service and Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) Agreement L13AC00102, Modification 5 Bombus vosnesenskii on Balsamorhiza sagittata. Photo by Rich Hatfield, the Xerces Society. By Rich Hatfield, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Black, the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation September 2017 1 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Site Descriptions (west to east) ................................................................................................................ 7 T14ES27 (USFS) ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Cape Horn (USFS) .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnaconitum, a New Genus of Ranunculaceae Endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
    TAXON 62 (4) • August 2013: 713–722 Wang & al. • Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Wei Wang,1 Yang Liu,2 Sheng-Xiang Yu,1 Tian-Gang Gao1 & Zhi-Duan Chen1 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, P.R. China 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Wei Wang, [email protected] Abstract The monophyly of traditional Aconitum remains unresolved, owing to the controversial systematic position and taxonomic treatment of the monotypic, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau endemic A. subg. Gymnaconitum. In this study, we analyzed two datasets using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods: (1) two markers (ITS, trnL-F) of 285 Delphinieae species, and (2) six markers (ITS, trnL-F, trnH-psbA, trnK-matK, trnS-trnG, rbcL) of 32 Delphinieae species. All our analyses show that traditional Aconitum is not monophyletic and that subgenus Gymnaconitum and a broadly defined Delphinium form a clade. The SOWH tests also reject the inclusion of subgenus Gymnaconitum in traditional Aconitum. Subgenus Gymnaconitum markedly differs from other species of Aconitum and other genera of tribe Delphinieae in many non-molecular characters. By integrating lines of evidence from molecular phylogeny, divergence times, morphology, and karyology, we raise the mono- typic A. subg. Gymnaconitum to generic status. Keywords Aconitum; Delphinieae; Gymnaconitum; monophyly; phylogeny; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; Ranunculaceae; SOWH test Supplementary Material The Electronic Supplement (Figs. S1–S8; Appendices S1, S2) and the alignment files are available in the Supplementary Data section of the online version of this article (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Wild Species General Status Listing 2010
    Fish & Wildlife Division Sustainable Resource Development Alberta Wild Species General Status Listing - 2010 Species at Risk ELCODE Group ID Scientific Name Common Name Status 2010 Status 2005 Status 2000 Background Lichens Cladonia cenotea Powdered Funnel Lichen Secure Cladonia cervicornis Lichens Ladder Lichen Secure verticillata Lichens Cladonia chlorophaea Mealy Pixie-cup Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia coccifera Eastern Boreal Pixie-cup Lichen Undetermined Lichens Cladonia coniocraea Common Pixie Powderhorn Secure Lichens Cladonia cornuta Bighorn Pixie Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia cornuta cornuta Bighorn Pixie Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia crispata Organpipe Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia cristatella British Soldiers Lichen Secure Cladonia Lichens Mealy Pixie-cup Lichen Undetermined cryptochlorophaea Lichens Cladonia cyanipes Blue-footed Pixie Lichen Sensitive Lichens Cladonia deformis Lesser Sulphur-cup Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia digitata Fingered Pixie-cup Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia ecmocyna Orange-footed Pixie Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia fimbriata Trumpeting Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia furcata Forking Lichen Sensitive Lichens Cladonia glauca Glaucous Pixie Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia gracilis gracilis Gracile Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia gracilis turbinata Bronzed Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia grayi Gray's Pixie-cup Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia humilis Humble Pixie-cup Lichen Undetermined Lichens Cladonia macilenta Lipstick Powderhorn Lichen Secure Cladonia macilenta Lichens
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflower Guide
    Pussypaws (or Pussy Toes) Sierra Morning Glory Western Peony Calyptridium umbellatum Calystegia malacophylla Paeonia brownii Portulacaceae (Purslane) family Convolvulaceae (Morning Glory) family Paeoniaceae (Peony) family May-August July–August May-June The flower head clusters are reminiscent There are over 1,000 species of morning This flower’s petals are maroon to of fuzzy kitten paws. The stems and glory worldwide. Many bloom in the early brownish and the flower usually nods, flower heads are often almost prostrate morning hours, giving the family or points downward, so it can be easy (lying on the ground). Pussypaws are its name. Tahoe Donner is near the upper to miss. widespread and somewhat variable. elevation of the range for Sierra morning glory. Rabbitbrush Snow Plant Willow WILDFLOWER Ericameria sp. Sarcodes sanguinea Salix spp. Asteraceae (Sunflower or Aster) family Ericaceae (Heath) family Salicaceae (Willow) family GUIDE August–October May–June March–June This shrub is common throughout the Appears almost as soon as snow melts. There are several types of willow in Tahoe Donner area. The tips of the Saprophytic plant: obtains nutrients from the Tahoe Donner area, with blooming branches look yellow throughout the decaying organic matter in the soil (no seasons that extend from March at least blooming season. photosynthesis). through June. The picture shows typical early-spring catkins (buds) that are getting ready to bloom, and gives the smaller types of willow the familiar name pussy willow. Ranger’s Buttons Varileaf Phacelia Woolly Mule Ears Sphenosciadium capitellatum Phacelia heterophylla Wyethia mollis Apiaceae (Carrot) family Hydrophyllaceae (Waterleaf) family Asteraceae (Sunflower or Aster) family July–August April–July June–July Often found in wet or swampy places.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana (PDF)
    Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana Authors: Amelia C. Dolan, Casey M. Delphia, Kevin M. O'Neill, and Michael A. Ivie This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Annals of the Entomological Society of America following peer review. The version of record for (see citation below) is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saw064. Dolan, Amelia C., Casey M Delphia, Kevin M. O'Neill, and Michael A. Ivie. "Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana." Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110, no. 2 (September 2017): 129-144. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saw064. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana Amelia C. Dolan,1 Casey M. Delphia,1,2,3 Kevin M. O’Neill,1,2 and Michael A. Ivie1,4 1Montana Entomology Collection, Montana State University, Marsh Labs, Room 50, 1911 West Lincoln St., Bozeman, MT 59717 ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]), 2Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, 3Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, and 4Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Allen Szalanski Received 10 May 2016; Editorial decision 12 August 2016 Abstract Montana supports a diverse assemblage of bumble bees (Bombus Latreille) due to its size, landscape diversity, and location at the junction of known geographic ranges of North American species. We compiled the first in- ventory of Bombus species in Montana, using records from 25 natural history collections and labs engaged in bee research, collected over the past 125 years, as well as specimens collected specifically for this project dur- ing the summer of 2015.
    [Show full text]