DOCSLIB.ORG

Title to the Aouzou Strip: a Legal and Historical Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title to the Aouzou Strip: a Legal and Historical Analysis The Yale Journal of International Law Volume 17, Number 2, Summer 1992 Articles Title to the Aouzou Strip: A Legal and Historical Analysis Matthew M. Ricciardi I. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 304 I. THE AoUzou STRIP AND ITs INHABrrANTs................................. 310 A. The Geography of the Area ......................... : ........... 310 B. The Toubous ............................................... 313 1. Area of Inhabitationand Origins ................................ 313 2. Physical and Cultural Traits of the Toubou People .................... 314 3. Social, Economic, and Political Organization ....................... 315 a. The Impact of the Physical Surroundings: The Clan System ............ 316 b. Structures of Authority: The Chief ........................... 319 c. Fragmentationand Recombination of Clans ...................... 321 d. Summary ........................................... 322 4. Geographic Distributionof the Toubou Clans ....................... 322 a. The Teda Clans of Tibesti ................................ 323 b. The Clans of Borku and Ennedi ............................. 329 5. Some ConclusionsAbout the Toubous ............................ 333 Ill. HISTORY OF THE AREA .......................................... 334 A. From the Tenth to the Nineteenth Century: The Influence of Kanem, Bornu, and Tripoli ................................................. 334 1. The Dominance of the South: Kanem, Bornu, and Ouadai ................ 335 2. The KaramanliDynasty in Tripoli and Expeditions to the South, 1711-1835 ..... 337 3. Early Ottoman Initiatives and Disturbancesfrom the East, 1835-1900 ........ 338 4. The Sanusi ............................................ 340 a. Origins and Spread of the Orderfrom 1856 to the late 1890s ........... 341 b. The Extent of Sanusi Influence: An Assessment .................... 344 5. Summary .............................................. 346 t J.D., Yale Law School, 1992; A.B., Princeton University, 1989. I would like to thank Professor W. Michael Reisman for his guidance and insightful suggestions. Special thanks also to Eric Beckman, Henry Davis, Dan Ehrenberg, Peter Samuelson, and Michale Walters for their tireless editorial efforts. 301 Yale Journal of International Law Vol. 17:301, 1992 B. The Turkish Presence and the First French Occupation of B.E.T., 1900-1916 ...... 346 1. Early French Probes, 1902-1909 ................................ 347 2. The Initial Turkish Response, 1900-1909 .......................... 348 3. Turkish Actions After the Young Turk Revolution, 1909-1912 .............. 350 a. The Arrival of Osman Efendi at Bardar.......................... 350 b. The Arrival of Captain R/ib at Ain Galakka ..................... 352 c. The FrenchReaction to RI ............................... 353 4. The French Conquest After the Turkish Evacuation, 1913-1916 ............ 355 5. Summary .............................................. 357 C. France'sWithdrawal From Tibesti, Subsequent Reoccupation, and Friction With Italy, 1916-1940 .............................................. 358 1. The Withdrawal From Tibesti ................................. 358 2. The Italian TerritorialDemands and France'sReoccupation of Tibesti ........ 359 3. The Mussolini-LavalAccords ................................. 362 4. Summary .............................................. 363 D. From World War 11 to Libyan Independence ........................... 363 E. The ChadianRevolt and Libya's Occupation of the Aouzou Strip, 1960-1973 ....... 366 F. ChangingAlignments and Attempts to Resolve the Dispute, 1973-1991 ........... 370 1. Overview ............................................. 370 2. The Malloum Government, BilateralDiscussions, and the Bongo Committee, 1975-1978 ............................................ 370 3. Goukouni, Habrj, and the GUNT, 1979-1982 ....................... 374 4. The HabrJ and Deby Governments, 1982-1991 ...................... 377 IV. THE OPERATIVE LEGAL PRINCIPLEs IN THE Aouzou STRIP DIsPUTE ............... 382 A. The Law of Occupation......................................... 385 1. The Confluence of Animus Domini and Corpus: Intention and Ability to Exercise Effective Control Over Territory .............................. 386 2. Codification of the Requirement of Effective Occupation ................. 391 a. The Final Act of the Conference of Berlin, 1885 ................... 391 b. The Declaration of the Institut de DroitInternational, 1888 ............ 393 c. The Convention of St.-Germain-en-Laye, 1919 .................... 395 3. The Definition of Terra Nullius ................................ 395 a. The Three Schools of Thought on Tribal Sovereignty ................ 396 b. The View of the InternationalCourt of Justice in the Western Sahara ...... 400 c. Summary ........................................... 402 4. Time Required to Complete an Occupation......................... 403 5. The Extent of the Occupied Territory: HinterlandTheories ............... 404 a. The Restrictive View of the Publicists .......................... 406 b. The Permissive View Embodied in State Practice .................. 408 6. Spheres of Influence ....................................... 409 7. Disguised Occupation: The Colonial Protectorate ..................... 412 B. Prescription ............................................... 413 The Aouzou Strip C. Conquest ................................................ 414 D. Cession ................................................. 415 E. Abandonment .............................................. 415 F. Principles of Islamic Law and the Arguments in Western Sahara ................ 416 1. Principles of the Islamic Law of Nations .......................... 417 2. The Western Sahara Case ................................... 418 a. Arguments Based on the Special Characterof the Moroccan State ........ 419 b. Considerationof the Sultan's Acts in Western Sahara ................ 422 3. Summary .............................................. 424 G. State Succession ............................................ 425 H. The Principle of Uti Possidetis ................................... 425 1. From Pan-Africanismto Uti Possidetis ........................... 426 2. The Burkina Faso-Mali Boundary Dispute ......................... 426 3. Importance to the Present Dispute ............................... 428 I. The Norm of Decolonization ..................................... 429 J. Relevant Principles of the Law of Treaties ............................. 430 1. The Law of Coercion in Treaty-Making ............................ 431 2. The Conclusion, Ratification, and Denunciation of Treaties ............... 432 K. Conclusion ............................................... 434 V. ANALYSiS OF THE CHADiAN AND LBYAN CLAims .......................... 434 A. Chad's Treaty-Based Claims .................................... 435 1. The 1955 Treaty of Friendship and Good Neighborliness ................ 435 2. The 1898 and 1899 Sphere of Influence Treaties and the 1902 Barrare-Prinetti Letters .............................................. 435 a. Legitimacy of the Delimitation of Zones of Influence ................ 437 b. Legitimacy Notwithstanding Failure to Specify Ownership ............. 438 c. French Attempts to Mollify Italy ............................. 439 d. The Question of the Map Annexed to the 1899 Declaration ............ 440 e. Discrepancy Between Treaty Language and Later Practice ............ 441 3. Later Treaties Clarifying the Boundary ........................... 443 a. The 1919 Convention and the 1924 Protocol ..................... 443 b. Effect of the 1955 Treaty on EarlierAgreements ................... 447 c. The 1934 Exchange of Notes ............................... 448 4. The 1966 Treaty with Libya .................................. 448 5. Summary .............................................. 450 B. Libyan Attempts to Undermine the 1955 Treaty .......................... 450 1. The Alleged Cession of 1972 ................................... 451 2. Attacking the 1955 Treaty as Colonial Diktat ....................... 453 a. ldris'sEarly Ties to the West .............................. 454 b. The Formation of the Libyan State ............................ 455 c. The Early Years of the Monarchy ............................ 456 d. Foreign Policy, the Base Agreements, and the Final Years of the Monarchy .. 456 303 Yale Journal of International Law Vol. 17:301, 1992 e. Conclusion .......................................... 459 C. The Mussolini-LavalAccords .................................... 460 1. The Treaty of Rome ....................................... 460 2. Analysis of Libya's Argument ................................. 463 D. The Sufficiency of the French Occupation ............................ 466 E. Occupation and the Question of Prior7tle ............................ 467 1. The Toubous ............................................ 468 2. The Sanusi ............................................. 470 3. The Ottoman Presence Under TraditionalPrinciples ................... 472 a. Acts of Occupation...................................... 473 b. Succession to Turkish Rights ............................... 475 c. Turko-Sanusi Cooperation ................................ 476 4. Libyan Arguments Based on Non-Traditional Principles ................. 479 a. Turkish Claims to the Region as a Hinterland .................... 480 b. Arguments Based on the Special Characteristicsof the Area and Its People and the Nature of the Ottoman
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leon Degrelle
    Hitler, Born at Versailles June 18, 2012 1 Introduction For most Americans the globe-girdling catastrophe that we call the Second World War is now a matter neither of personal experience nor of memory, but of wood pulp and celluloid, books and films. Larger still is the majority for whom the cataclysmic First World War - once spoken of as "The Great War" - is ancient history, an antic prelude to what those who participated in it sometimes like to call "The Big One." For most of us, perhaps, the two wars compare as do contrasting movies from the two eras. Our image of the First World War is brief, grainy, silent, with black-and-white, herky-jerky doughboys "going over the top"; we picture the Second as panoramic, technicolor, reverberating with stereophonic sound and fury, armadas of ships and planes and tanks sweeping forward to destiny. A further disparity may be found in the popular historical and political as- sessment, such as it is, of the two wars. The majority of Americans doubtless still believes that the key to the Second World War is a simple one: a.demonic megalomaniac, Adolf Hitler, rose up to lead Germany to world domination and instead led his people to well-deserved ruin. Yet the view of the First World War held by the Americans of today, it is safe to say, is rather more tepid than the white-hot feelings of many of their grandparents in 1917, when "100- per-cent Americans" agitated to "Hang the Kaiser!" and mobs sacked German newspaper offices and presses in the worst outbreak of ethnic bigotry in our country’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Italy and the Sanusiyya: Negotiating Authority in Colonial Libya, 1911-1931 Eileen Ryan Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 ©2012 Eileen Ryan All rights reserved ABSTRACT Italy and the Sanusiyya: Negotiating Authority in Colonial Libya, 1911-1931 By Eileen Ryan In the first decade of their occupation of the former Ottoman territories of Tripolitania and Cyrenaica in current-day Libya, the Italian colonial administration established a system of indirect rule in the Cyrenaican town of Ajedabiya under the leadership of Idris al-Sanusi, a leading member of the Sufi order of the Sanusiyya and later the first monarch of the independent Kingdom of Libya after the Second World War. Post-colonial historiography of modern Libya depicted the Sanusiyya as nationalist leaders of an anti-colonial rebellion as a source of legitimacy for the Sanusi monarchy. Since Qaddafi’s revolutionary coup in 1969, the Sanusiyya all but disappeared from Libyan historiography as a generation of scholars, eager to fill in the gaps left by the previous myopic focus on Sanusi elites, looked for alternative narratives of resistance to the Italian occupation and alternative origins for the Libyan nation in its colonial and pre-colonial past. Their work contributed to a wider variety of perspectives in our understanding of Libya’s modern history, but the persistent focus on histories of resistance to the Italian occupation has missed an opportunity to explore the ways in which the Italian colonial framework shaped the development of a religious and political authority in Cyrenaica with lasting implications for the Libyan nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Conflict
    LIBYA’S BRIEF / 12 CONFLICT Nov 2019 A very short introduction SERIES by Wolfgang Pusztai Freelance security and policy analyst * INTRODUCTION Eight years after the revolution, Libya is in the mid- dle of a civil war. For more than four years, inter- national conflict resolution efforts have centred on the UN-sponsored Libya Political Agreement (LPA) process,1 unfortunately without achieving any break- through. In fact, the situation has even deteriorated Summary since the onset of Marshal Haftar’s attack on Tripoli on 4 April 2019.2 › Libya is a failed state in the middle of a civil war and increasingly poses a threat to the An unstable Libya has wide-ranging impacts: as a safe whole region. haven for terrorists, it endangers its north African neighbours, as well as the wider Sahara region. But ter- › The UN-facilitated stabilisation process was rorists originating from or trained in Libya are also a unsuccessful because it ignored key political threat to Europe, also through the radicalisation of the actors and conflict aspects on the ground. Libyan expatriate community (such as the Manchester › While partially responsible, international Arena bombing in 2017).3 Furthermore, it is one of the interference cannot be entirely blamed for most important transit countries for migrants on their this failure. way to Europe. Through its vast oil wealth, Libya is also of significant economic relevance for its neigh- › Stabilisation efforts should follow a decen- bours and several European countries. tralised process based on the country’s for- mer constitution. This Conflict Series Brief focuses on the driving factors › Wherever there is a basic level of stability, of conflict dynamics in Libya and on the shortcomings fostering local security (including the crea- of the LPA in addressing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Tcd Str Hno2017 Fr 20161216.Pdf
    APERÇU DES 2017 BESOINS HUMANITAIRES PERSONNES DANS LE BESOIN 4,7M NOV 2016 TCHAD OCHA/Naomi Frerotte Ce document est élaboré au nom de l'Equipe Humanitaire Pays et de ses partenaires. Ce document présente la vision des crises partagée par l'Equipe Humanitaire Pays, y compris les besoins humanitaires les plus pressants et le nombre estimé de personnes ayant besoin d'assistance. Il constitue une base factuelle consolidée et contribue à informer la planification stratégique conjointe de réponse. Les appellations employées dans le rapport et la présentation des différents supports n'impliquent pas d'opinion quelconque de la part du Secrétariat de l'Organisation des Nations Unies concernant le statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones, ou de leurs autorités, ni de la délimitation de ses frontières ou limites géographiques. www.unocha.org/tchad www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/chad @OCHAChad PARTIE I : PARTIE I : RÉSUMÉ Besoins humanitaires et chiffres clés Impact de la crise Personnes dans le besoin Sévérité des besoins 03 PERSONNESPARTIE DANS LEI : BESOIN Personnes dans le besoin par Sites et Camps de déplacement catégorie (en milliers) M Site de retournés 4,7 Population Camp de réfugiés Ressortissants locale de pays tiers Sites/lieux de déplacement interne EGYPTE Personnes xx déplacées Réfugiés MAS supérieur à 2% internes Retournés Phases du Cadre Harmonisé (période projetée, juin-août 2017) LIBYE Minimale (phase 1) Sous pression (phase 2) Crise (phase 3) TIBESTI 13 NIGER ENNEDI OUEST 35 ENNEDI EST BORKOU 82 04
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Mcmaster Rich
    Jeremy McMaster Rich Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences Marywood University 2300 Adams Avenue, Scranton, PA 18509 570-348-6211 extension 2617 [email protected] EDUCATION Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. Ph.D., History, June 2002 Thesis: “Eating Disorders: A Social History of Food Supply and Consumption in Colonial Libreville, 1840-1960.” Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Phyllis Martin Major Field: African history. Minor Fields: Modern West European history, African Studies Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. M.A., History, December 1994 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. B.A. with Honors, History, June 1993 Dean’s List 1990-1991, 1992-1993 TEACHING Marywood University, Scranton, PA. Associate Professor, Dept. of Social Sciences, 2011- Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN. Associate Professor, Dept. of History, 2007-2011 Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN. Assistant Professor, Dept. of History, 2006-2007 University of Maine at Machias, Machias, ME. Assistant Professor, Dept. of History, 2005-2006 Cabrini College, Radnor, PA. Assistant Professor (term contract), Dept. of History, 2002-2004 Colby College, Waterville, ME. Visiting Instructor, Dept. of History, 2001-2002 CLASSES TAUGHT African History survey, African-American History survey (2 semesters), Atlantic Slave Trade, Christianity in Modern Africa (online and on-site), College Success, Contemporary Africa, France and the Middle East, Gender in Modern Africa, Global Environmental History in the Twentieth Century, Historical Methods (graduate course only), Historiography, Modern Middle East History, US History survey to 1877 and 1877-present (2 semesters), Women in Modern Africa (online and on-site courses), Twentieth Century Global History, World History survey to 1500 and 1500 to present (2 semesters, distance and on-site courses) BOOKS With Douglas Yates.
    [Show full text]
  • BOKO HARAM NOTE N° 246 - Fondation Jean-Jaurès - 10 Février 2015 REGIONAL ISSUES AROUND the UPRISING Marc-Antoine Pérouse De Montclos*
    BOKO HARAM NOTE n° 246 - Fondation Jean-Jaurès - 10 février 2015 REGIONAL ISSUES AROUND THE UPRISING Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos* *Associate Fellow, Africa hile the African Union plans to mobilise more than 8,000 men from Nigeria, Programme, Chatham Chad, Cameroon and Benin to fight Boko Haram, the following analysis House, London W focuses on the regional issues surrounding the crisis. The aim is not to concentrate on the origins or the social dimension of the sect; these have already been dealt with in field studies and secondary sources1. In a first part, the analysis shows that Boko Haram has been present in Niger, Chad and Cameroon ever since its birth in Maiduguri, in the Borno region, around 2002. Regarding territory, it also shows that we are not looking at an expansion of its area of control, but of its field of military actions since the armies of countries neighbouring Nigeria got involved in operations to erase the sect. In fact, the growing involvement of Niger, Chad and Cameroon in the fight against Jihadist terrorism has broken the mutual non-aggression pact that was in place. In an audio report dated the 6th of June 2014, Boko Haram threatened President Idriss Déby with reprisals if he was to join forces with Nigeria in their attacks on the sect. In addition to this, in an interview filmed and broadcast on the 28th of January 2015, a spokesman for the rebels stated that the group would stop attacking Niger and Chad if they stopped their offensive against the group. It appears that the international reaction to the threat of terrorism from Boko Haram could be a contributing factor in the future international expansion of a sect whose ire, until now, had been contained to Nigeria: they had not established links with a wider diaspora or coordinated efforts with other jihadist groups in the Sahel.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sette-Camara
    DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SETTE-CAMARA 1 regret that 1 have been unable to agree with the Court's majority in the present Judgment in its appraisal of the facts, in its reasoning and in its conclusions, and therefore feel under the obligation to explain why 1 see this case differently. The disputed zone is the so-called Libya-Chad borderlands, bounded to the north-east by the east-south-east line of the Anglo-French Conven- tion of 8 September 1919, to the south by the 15" north latitude parallel, to the West by the 24" E meridian and to the east by the 16" E meridian. It covers an area of some 530,000 km' and encompasses the Borkou- Ounianga, the Ennedi and the Tibesti, what Chad refers to as the BET (excluding northern Kanem). The population of the area is under 100,000, compared with Chad's population of some 5.4 million, including the BET. The area contains 2 per cent of Chadian local population and it is a poor, bare and inhospitable region. In spite of the desertic nature of this zone, that we shall for conven- terra nullius. ience continue to cal1 the borderlands. it was never a , ouen. to occupation according to international law. The two Parties concur as to that, and echo herein the analogous finding of the Court in the Western Sahara case. The land was occupied by local indigenous tribes, confed- erations of tribes, often organized under the Senoussi Order. Further- more, it was under the distant and laxly exercised sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire, which marked its presence by delegation of authority to local people.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Committee
    CRISIS COMMITTEE Lyon Model United Nations 2018 Study Guide Libyan Civil War !1 LyonMUN 2018 – Libyan Civil War Director: Thomas Ron Deputy Director: Malte Westphal Chairs: Laurence Turner and Carine Karaki Backroom: Ben Bolton, Camille Saikali, Margaux Da Silva, and Antoine Gaudim !2 Director’s Welcome Dear Delegates, On behalf of the whole team I would like to welcome you to LyonMUN 2018 and this simulation of the Libyan Civil War. It is strange to feel that such an important topic that we all remember happening is already over 7 years old. Therefore, we felt it would be a good time to simulate it and think about the ways it could have gone. As delegates you will each be given characters to play in this crisis. These were real people who made a difference within the actual Civil War and have their own objectives and goals. You are tasked with advancing the goals of your character and making sure that they end up doing well out of this crisis. Every action will have consequences, everything you do will have ramifications, and mistakes can be deadly. Your chairs will be there to help but they will also be representing characters and have their own interests, meaning they may not be fully trustworthy. Behind the scenes you will have a backroom which will interpret your directives and move the plot forward. We will be there to read what you say and put it into action. However, a word to the wise, the way your wish may be interpreted may not be ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Vichy Against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État Français from 1940 to the Present
    Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present Audrey Mallet A Thesis In the Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne December 2016 © Audrey Mallet, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Audrey Mallet Entitled: Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Chair Dr. G. LeBlanc External Examiner Dr. E. Jennings External to Program Dr. F. Chalk Examiner Dr. D. Peschanski Examiner Dr. C. Claveau Thesis Co-Supervisor Dr. N. Ingram Thesis Co-Supervisor Dr. H. Rousso Approved by: Dr. B. Lorenzkowski, Graduate Program Director December 5, 2016 Dr. A. Roy, Dean, Faculty of Arts & Science Abstract Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present Audrey Mallet, Ph.D. Concordia University & Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne, 2016 Following the June 22, 1940 armistice and the subsequent occupation of northern France by the Germans, the French government left Paris and eventually established itself in the city of Vichy.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives De La Famille Ferry
    Archives départementales des Vosges 40 J Archives de la famille Ferry (1813-1981) Répertoire numérique détaillé établi par Mélanie GLESS stagiaire, licence Gestion de l’information et du Document pour les Organisations à Mulhouse avec la collaboration de Benoît MARTIN attaché de conservation sous la direction d’Isabelle CHAVE , conservatrice du patrimoine, directrice des Archives départementales des Vosges Épinal, 2005/2006 INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________________________________ Historique du fonds Les archives de la famille Ferry sont entrées aux Archives départementales des Vosges en 1985 par voie extraordinaire. Elles ont été rassemblées par Hélène Ferry, épouse d’Abel, - lui-même neveu de Jules Ferry -, qui en a fait don pour une grande partie à sa fille Fresnette Pisani-Ferry. Cette dernière, dans son testament olographe du 8 février 1978, légua au musée des Ferry à Saint-Dié-des- Vosges « toutes les archives classées par sa mère ». Cependant, deux codicilles vinrent bouleverser leurs destinées en 1981 et 1982. En 1981, elle annula les précédentes dispositions au bénéfice de la bibliothèque municipale de Saint-Dié et fixa des conditions de conservation, de classement et d'accessibilité du fonds, dont le contrôle fut délégué au directeur du Centre national de la recherche scientifique. Le non respect de ces conditions avéré, elles furent léguées aux Archives de France en 1982, qui confirma, en 1985, la conservation physique du fonds aux Archives départementales des Vosges. Initialement conservé au chalet des Ferry à Saint-Dié, le fonds a donc été successivement conservé à la bibliothèque municipale de Saint-Dié, puis aux Archives départementales des Vosges, à Épinal. La correspondance de Jean Pisani-Ferry, exécuteur testamentaire de sa mère, Fresnette, et d’Odile Jurbert, directrice des Archives départementales des Vosges, en 1985, laisse à penser qu’une partie du fonds était toujours conservée dans une propriété de la famille Ferry à cette date.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938)
    A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938) by Efe Peker MSc, Linköping University, 2006 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Joint Degree (Cotutelle) of Doctor of Philosophy Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Simon Fraser University (Canada) and History, Faculty of Human Sciences at Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (France) © Efe Peker 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON-SORBONNE Spring 2016 Approval Name: Efe Peker Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938) Examining Committee: Chair: Wendy Chan Professor Gary Teeple Senior Supervisor Professor Patrick Weil Senior Supervisor Professor Centre d’histoire sociale du XXème siècle Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Gerardo Otero Supervisor Professor School for International Studies Gilles Dorronsoro Internal Examiner Professor Political Science Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Rita Hermon-Belot External Examiner Professor History École des hautes études en sciences sociales Philip Gorski External Examiner Professor Sociology Yale University Date Defended/Approved: March 11, 2016 ii Abstract This dissertation features a comparative-historical examination of macrosocietal secularisation in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938), with particular attention to their republican state building experiences. Bridging
    [Show full text]
  • LIBYA: Libya Administrative Map
    LIBYA: Libya Administrative Map AL JIFARAH TRIPOLI AL JABAL AN NUQAT Az Zawiyah AL MARJ AL AKHDAR Abu Kammash AL KHAMS Ra's Ajdir !( !( !( AL MARQAB ⛡ Al Baydah Zaltan Mediterranean Sea !( Zuwarah Tripoli Ra's al Hamamah !( Tripoli !( !(!( !( ⛡ !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( Al Bayda !( Al Athrun Riqdalin !( !( ⛡!(!( !( ⛜!( !(!( Azzawiya \ Susah !( Al Assah!( !( Janzur !( !( !( !( !( Mansur!(ah!( !( !( !( ⛡ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Darnah Al Jumayl !( !( Zawiyat al `Urqub !( !( Suq ad Dawawidah !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( ⛡!( !( Al Fatih !( !( A⛜l Abraq !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ⛡Derna !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( Qasr Khiyar !(!(!( Al Khums !(!( QabilatS alimah !( Qaryat Sidi Shahir ad Din !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Ahqaf a!(l Jabhiya!(h ⛜ !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( Suq al Khamis !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( Martubah!( Suq as Sab!( t !(!(!( !( !( Al Uwayliyah ash Sha!( rqiyah!( Qasr Libiya !(Zawiyat Umm Hufayn !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Al Aquriyah Khadra' !( !( !( Umm ar Rizam Al Watyah!( !( !( !( !( Al Bumbah North Air Base TUNISIA !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( Okba Ibn Nafa Air Base !( !( Ki`am !(!( ⛜ Asbi`ah !( !(!( !( !( !( !( Misratah Al!( Mabni Qabilat al Kawarighiliyah !( !( ⛜ !( !( !( Marawah !( !( AlH uwayjat !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( Tansulukh!( !( !( ⛡!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(M!(!( isurata !( !( QaryatB uR uwayyah !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( At Tamimi!( !( Mintaqat ad Daghdughi !( Bamba Bi'r al Ghanam Bu Ghaylan !(!( !( Qaryat ar Rus !( Al M!( arj !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( Zawiyat al `Izziyat!(
    [Show full text]