DOCSLIB.ORG

COMPARISON of ARTHROPOD ABUNDANCE and Dlverslty in INTERCROPPING AGROFORESTRY and CORN MONOCULTURE SYSTEMS in SOUTHERN ONTARIO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COMPARISON of ARTHROPOD ABUNDANCE and Dlverslty in INTERCROPPING AGROFORESTRY and CORN MONOCULTURE SYSTEMS in SOUTHERN ONTARIO COMPARISON OF ARTHROPOD ABUNDANCE AND DlVERSlTY IN INTERCROPPING AGROFORESTRY AND CORN MONOCULTURE SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO Heather Dawn Howell A thesis submitted in confomity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forestry Graduate Faculty of Forestry University of Toronto @Copyright by Heather Dawn Howell, 2001 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence aüowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libmy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fih, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. tbesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimes reproduced without the author' s ou autrement reproduits saas son permission. autorisation. FACULTY OF FORESTRY University of Toronto DEPARTMENTAL ORAL EXAMINATION FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FORESTRY Examination of Ms. Heather HOWELL Examination Chair's Signature: &&J%/ We approve this thesis and affim that it meets the departmental oral examination requirements set dom for the degree of Master of Science in Foresby. Examination Cornmittee: Abstract Cornparison of arthropod abundance and diversity in intercropping agroforestry and corn monoculture systems in southem Ontario. Master of Science in Forestry. 2001. Heather Dawn Howell. Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto Arthropod communities were compared between a corn (Zea mays L.) monoculture and a corn intercropped agroforestry system in southern Ontario during 1998 and 1999. Pan trap data were used in June 1998 while malaise trap data were examined between June-September 1999. Arthropod abundanœ, representation by functional group, and hymenopteran family richness and diversity were al1 compared between the intercropped and the monoculture sites. Differenœs in arthropod abundance within the intercropped system were also cornPa& between: 1) tree rows with Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) or btack walnut (Juglans nigra L.); and 2) tree rows and crop alleys. Taxa such as Opiliones. Dennaptera and Carabidae, which are associated with organic litter areas that provide shelter during the day, were significantly higher in the agroforestry system than in the monocuiture system. The abundance of Hymenoptera, and several of its families, was also significantly higher in the agroforestry site than in the monoculture site, atthough no differences were observed in temis of overall family richness and diversity. There were significantly higher numbers of parasitoids and detritivores in the intercropped agroforestry system than in the monoculture system, and the intercropped treatment also supported a significantly higher ratio of parasitoids to herbivores. My results suggest that intercropping trees with crops such as corn monoculture can improve pest management by providing habitat to augment natural enemies populations. Dedication During the time when Iwas struggling through this thesis. my little sister Catherine Middleton and my father-in-law Glen Howell undement their own momentous challenges after being diagnosed with cancer. I would like to dedicate my thesis to both of them for having the strength and the courage to overcome their difficult batUe and to thank them for the love and encouragement that they gave me during the course of this work. iii Acknowledgement I wish to thank the many people who have helped me through this adventure. f irst and foremost, I would like to extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to rny supervisor, Dr. Sandy Smith (University of Toronto, Forestry) for providing me with the opportunity to do this study, in addition to her assistance and understanding throughout the development of this thesis. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my cornmittee members for their insightFul guidance and advice: Dr. Andy Kenney (University of Toronto, Forestry) for expanding my knowledge of agroforestry systems and for his guidance in statistics; Dr. Chris Darling (Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto) for sharing his knowledge and enthusiasm for the Hymenoptera; and Dr. Andy Gordon (University of Guelph) for originally inspiring me to do this study many years ago during my undergraduate days. Thanks also to Dr. Isabel Bellocq (University of Toronto, Forestry) for participating in the defence phase and for providing helpful adviœ during the course of the writing. Iwould like to acknowledge the Faculty of Forestry for their financial support through the Graduate Fellowship in Forestry award. I am also greatly indebted to many people who have contributed a significant amount of their time to help me in the field, the laboratory, with the statistical approach and in other numerous ways. 1 would like to start by giving my deepest thanks to my brother, Doug Middleton, who volunteered a large number of hours helping me out in the field and in the laboratory. Large appreciation also goes out to Ping Zhang, Chantal Lalonde, Robin Thornton, Tanya Campolin and the Kentner family for helping me with aspects of field work. Special thanks to Naresh Thevathasan. Rick Gray (Agoroforestry Research Group) and Peter Milton (University of Guelph Agricultural Research Stations) for their technical support with the research fields. Thank you to Alexi Baev for al1 of his hard work in the laboratory with arthropod sorting and identification. I would also like to give a note of appreciation to Deborah Yurman, Bill McMartin and Christine Vance who gave me advice on my statistical analysis. My sincere gratitude goes to Dr. Fuhua Liu (Faculty of Forestry), who spent many hours with me, analysing my data together while patiently helping me to improve my knowledge of statistics. Thank you also to Robert Moloney (Agriculture Co-op, Barrie), for his expert knowledge on aspects of agronomy. I would also like to express my gratitude to Wendy Lake, Alison Howell, Rita Howell and Glen Howell for their careful editing assistance. Additionally, 1 would like to thank my friends and colleagues in my laboratory and within the Faculty of Forestry for their warm friendship, advice and support over the years I have been a student at the university. Most importantly I would like to thank my family and friends, especially my mom and my grandfather, for their love and encouragement throughout my thesis work. 1 have reserved my last note of heartfelt love and gratitude for my husband, Morley Howell, who has given me the tremendous technical, financial and ernotional support that made it possible to achieve my dream of completing a masters thesis. Table of Contents .. Abstract ................................................................................................................................II Dedication......................................................................................................................... III... Acknowledgement.............................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. vi ... List of Tables ................................................................................................................... VIII List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... x Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 RATIONALE.......................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review .................................................................................................... ARTHROPODSIN AGROECOSYSTEMS.......................................................................... Ecological Funetions of Arthropods in the Agroecosystem .................................. Importance of Hymenoptera in Agroecosystems ................................................. VEGETATIONALDIVERSITY AND AGROECOSYSTEMSTABILITY ................. Habitats with Adjacent Vegetation ................................. ................ lntercropping Systems .................................................. ................. AGROFQRESTRY,~NTERCROPP~NG AGROFORESTRY AND ART'HROPODS .. Agroforestry in North America .................................... ................. Intercropping Agroforestry in North America ........................................................... 7 8 Arthropods in Agroforestry Systems ........................................................................ 20 Materials and Methods...................................................................................................... 27 SITE SELECTIONFOR SAMPLING......................................................................................... -28 DATAANALY SIS .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ecological Users in Forest Roles of Wildlife Tree Ecosystems
    LAND MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 35 The Ecological Roles of Wildlife Tree Users in Forest Ecosystems 1995 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program The Ecological Roles of Wildlife Tree Users in Forest Ecosystems Marlene M. Machmer and Christoph Steeger Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Machmer, Marlene M. The ecological roles of wildlife tree users in forest ecosystems (Land management handbook ; 35) “This handbook prepared by Pandion Ecological Research Ltd.”--Verso of t.p. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-2418-6 1. Forest fauna – Ecology - British Columbia. 2. Forest fauna - Feeding and foods - British Columbia. 3. Forest insects - Biological control - British Columbia. 4. Trees -Wounds and injuries - British Columbia. 5. Forest management - British Columbia. I. Steeger, Chrisoph, 1958– . II. British Columbia. Ministry of Forests. Research Branch. III. Pandion Ecological Research Ltd. IV. Title. V. Series. SB764.C3M32 1995 574.5’2642’09711 C95-960108-2 Prepared by Pandion Ecological Research Ltd. P.O. Box 26, Ymir, BC V0G 2K0 © 1995 Province of British Columbia Published by the Research Branch B.C. Ministry of Forests 31 Bastion Square Victoria, BC v8w 3E7 Copies of this and other Ministry of Forests titles are available from Crown Publications Inc. 521 Fort Street Victoria, BC v8w 1E7 SUMMARY This report synthesizes North American litera- in pest density. They also affect pest abundance ture about the effects of wildlife tree users on indirectly by altering the microclimate of their invertebrate and vertebrate pest populations. prey and by increasing pest susceptibility to The feeding habits of 92 species of wildlife tree other mortality agents such as parasitism, pre- users in British Columbia are described along dation, disease and weather.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Pattern Modulates Ground Arthropod Diversity in Semi-Arid Mediterranean Steppes
    insects Article Vegetation Pattern Modulates Ground Arthropod Diversity in Semi-Arid Mediterranean Steppes Fernando Meloni 1,2,3,* , Berta F. Civieta 2, Juan A. Zaragoza 2, María Lourdes Moraza 4 and Susana Bautista 2 1 Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, CEP 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, Brazil 2 Department of Ecology and IMEM, University of Alicante, E-03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain; [email protected] (B.F.C.); [email protected] (J.A.Z.); [email protected] (S.B.) 3 National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems, CEP 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 4 Department of Environmental Biology, University of Navarra, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +55-16-3315-4865 Received: 3 December 2019; Accepted: 15 January 2020; Published: 18 January 2020 Abstract: The ecological functioning of dryland ecosystems is closely related to the spatial pattern of the vegetation, which is typically structured in patches. Ground arthropods mediate key soil functions and ecological processes, yet little is known about the influence of dryland vegetation pattern on their abundance and diversity. Here, we investigate how patch size and cover, and distance between patches relate to the abundance and diversity of meso-and microarthropods in semi-arid steppes. We found that species richness and abundance of ground arthropods exponentially increase with vegetation cover, patch size, and patch closeness. The communities under vegetation patches mainly respond to patch size, while the communities in the bare-soil interpatches are mostly controlled by the average distance between patches, independently of the concurrent changes in vegetation cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Moths of Tinsukia District, Assam: a JEZS 2017; 5(6): 1612-1621 © 2017 JEZS Provisional Inventory Received: 10-09-2017 Accepted: 11-10-2017
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(6): 1612-1621 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Macro moths of Tinsukia district, Assam: A JEZS 2017; 5(6): 1612-1621 © 2017 JEZS provisional inventory Received: 10-09-2017 Accepted: 11-10-2017 Subhasish Arandhara Subhasish Arandhara, Suman Barman, Rubul Tanti and Abhijit Boruah Upor Ubon Village, Kakopather, Tinsukia, Assam, India Abstract Suman Barman This list reports 333 macro moth species for the Tinsukia district of Assam, India. The moths were Department of Wildlife Sciences, captured by light trapping as well as by opportunistic sighting across 37 sites in the district for a period of Gauhati University, Assam, three years from 2013-2016. Identification was based on material and visual examination of the samples India with relevant literature and online databases. The list includes the family, subfamily, tribes, scientific name, the author and year of publication of description for each identified species. 60 species in this Rubul Tanti inventory remain confirmed up to genus. Department of Wildlife Biology, A.V.C. College, Tamil Nadu, Keywords: Macro moths, inventory, Lepidoptera, Tinsukia, Assam India Introduction Abhijit Boruah Upor Ubon Village, Kakopather, The order Lepidoptera, a major group of plant-eating insects and thus, from the agricultural Tinsukia, Assam, India and forestry point of view they are of immense importance [1]. About 134 families comprising 157, 000 species of living Lepidoptera, including the butterflies has been documented globally [2], holding around 17% of the world's known insect fauna. Estimates, however, suggest more species in the order [3]. Naturalists for convenience categorised moths into two informal groups, the macro moths having larger physical size and recency in evolution and micro moths [4] that are smaller in size and primitive in origin .
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of Canada 463 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 463–505 (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada 463 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Lepidoptera of Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Jean-François Landry2, B. Chris Schmidt2, Jeremy R. deWaard3 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320 – 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada 2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 3 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Corresponding author: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 6 June 2018 | Accepted 20 August 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/D18E9BBE-EB97-4528-B312-70C3AA9C3FD8 Citation: Pohl GR, Landry J-F, Schmidt BC, deWaard JR (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 463–505. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 Abstract The known Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) of the provinces and territories of Canada are summarised, and current knowledge is compared to the state of knowledge in 1979. A total of 5405 species are known to occur in Canada in 81 families, and a further 50 species have been reported but are unconfirmed. This represents an increase of 1348 species since 1979. The DNA barcodes available for Canadian Lepidoptera are also tabulated, based on a dataset of 148,314 specimens corresponding to 5842 distinct clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 143, Number 6
    Ulr. Off* SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 143, NUMBER 6 THE CATERPILLAR AND THE BUTTERFLY By R. E. SNODGRASS Research Associate Smithsonian Institution (Publication 4472) \iru iMQV {JBRP&l^f CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOVEMBER 3, 1961 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 143, NUMBER 6 THE CATERPILLAR AND THE BUTTERFLY By R. E. SNODGRASS Research Associate Smithsonian Institution «» ^<5? «2P^ (Publication 4472) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOVEMBER 3, 1961 PORT CITY PRESS, INC. BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. Fig. i.—The celery caterpillar and butterfly, Papilio polyxenus asterius Stoll. THE CATERPILLAR AND THE BUTTERFLY By R. E. SNODGRASS Research Associate Smithsonian Institution INTRODUCTION The caterpillar and the butterfly are here given the title role because they are a familiar example of those insects in which the young differ so much from their parents that they must go through a reconstruction called a metamorphosis in order to attain their own adult form. So well known, in fact, is the apparent transformation of the wormlike caterpillar into the splendid winged butterfly, and so marvelous does it seem, that it has been taken as a symbol of human resurrection. In ancient Greek the human mind or soul was called psyche, and the same name was given to the butterfly, presumably the emancipated soul of the caterpillar. Though the process of resurrection is obscure, and the fact has perhaps not been fully demonstrated, we now know almost the whole story of how the caterpillar appears to become a butterfly. Furthermore, in recent years students of insect meta- morphosis have given much attention to the role of hormones in con- trolling the life of the young insect and the development of the adult.
    [Show full text]
  • The Juvenile Hormone. I. Endocrine Activity of the Corpora Allata of the Adult Cecropia Silkworm
    THE JUVENILE HORMONE. I. ENDOCRINE ACTIVITY OF THE CORPORA ALLATA OF THE ADULT CECROPIA SILKWORM CARROLL M. WILLIAMS' The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge 38, Massachusetts The endocrine role of the corpora allata of insects was discovered by V. B. Wigglesworth ( 1934, 1936) over twenty years ago. In a series of simple and decisive experiments on Rhodnius he showed that the corpora allata secrete a “¿juvenilehormone―which opposes metamorphosis. In these early studies Wig glesworth also recognized that the corpora allata undergo pronounced changes in endocrine activity during the course of metamorphosis ; namely, that they are active in the immature nymph, inactive in the mature nymph just prior to metamor phosis, and active again in the adult insect after metamorphosis. Subsequently, the general validity of these conclusions has been confirmed repeatedly and found to apply to both hemi- and holometabolous insects (for review, see Wigglesworth, 1954, pages 56—64). During the past twelve years, in the course of studies of the metamorphosis of the Cecropia silkworm, the juvenile hormone has necessarily been an object of detailedattention.While confirmingthe essentialelementsin Wigglesworth's theory, the study has helped to resolve certain persistent mysteries and, more recently, has pointed the way to the successful extraction and purification of the hormone itself. This first of a series of communications is concerned with the endocrine activity of the corpora allata of the adult moth. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Experimental animals The experiments were performed on Cecropia, Cynthia, and Polyphemus silk worms. Taxonomists continue to amuse themselves by changing the generic and specific names of these Saturniids.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 19 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hausmann Axel Artikel/Article: The morphology of the geometrid moths of the Levant and neighbouring countries Part I : Orthostixinae and Geometrinae 3-90 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 19 (1/2) : 3-90 ; 21.XL1996 ISSN 0342-7536 The morphology of the geometrid moths of the Levant and neighbouring countries Part I : Orthostixinae and Geometrinae Axel Hausmann Zoologische Staatssammlung, Münchhausenstr. 21, D-81247 München, Germany Summary This is the first of a series of articles on the Geometrid moths occurring in the Levant and neighbouring countries (Middle East). Morphological de- scriptions of 53 taxa at species or subspecies level are accompanied by illustrations of venation (for all genera) and of male and female genitalia (for all taxa). Differential diagnoses of genera and discussions on possible relationships are added. In a general revision of the systematic arrangement more than 100 genera are attributed to 19 Old World tribes or subfamilies. The validity of subfamily rank for Orthostixinae Meyrick, 1892 (Genochro- minae auct. nec Guenée, 1857) is confirmed, including seven genera, and its differential features given. One new tribe is established : Microloxiini tribus n. with the type genus Microloxia Warren, 1893. Three new genera and one new subgenus are established : Microbaena gen. n. with type species Pho- rodesma pulchra Staudinger, 1897 ; Proteuchloris gen. n. with type species [Geometra (Phorodesma)] neriaha Herrich-Schäffer, 1852 ; Acidromodes gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Classification and Phylogeny of Geometrinae (Lepidoptera
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2018, 184, 653–672. With 2 figures. Tribal classification and phylogeny of Geometrinae Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/184/3/653/4996193 by Institute of Zoology, CAS user on 05 November 2018 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) inferred from seven gene regions XIAOSHUANG BAN1,2,†, NAN JIANG1,†, RUI CHENG1,†, DAYONG XUE1 AND HONGXIANG HAN1,* 1Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China Received 30 September 2017; revised 18 January 2018; accepted for publication 27 February 2018 Despite recent progress in the molecular systematics of Geometridae, phylogenetic relationships within the sub- family Geometrinae remain largely unexplored. To infer the relationships among tribes, we performed a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Geometrinae based on 116 species representing 17 of the 18 recognized tribes, mainly from the Palaearctic and Oriental regions. Fragments of one mitochondrial and six nuclear genes were sequenced, yielding a total of 5805 bp of nucleotide data. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded largely congruent results. The monophyly of Geometrinae and most recognized tribes is supported. We present a new phylogenetic classifica- tion for Geometrinae composed of 13 tribes, two of which are proposed here as new: Ornithospilini trib. nov. and Agathiini trib. nov. A broad concept of Hemitheini is presented by the inclusion of nine subtribes, with Thalerini as a new synonym of Hemitheiti. The close relationship among Nemoriini, Synchlorini and Comibaenini, and the sister relationship between Timandromorphini and Geometrini is well supported.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2021 VOL. 31 SUPPLEMENT 2
    July 2021 VOL. 31 TROPICAL SUPPLEMENT 2 LEPIDOPTERA Research Apatani Glory Elcysma ziroensis (Zygaenidae, Chalcosiinae) Sanjay Sondhi, Tarun Karmakar, Yash Sondhi and Krushnamegh Kunte. 2021. Moths of Tale Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India with seventeen additions to the moth fauna of India (Lepidoptera: Heterocera). Tropical Lepidoptera Research 31(Supplement 2): 1-53. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5062572. TROPICAL LEPIDOPTERA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION FOR TROPICAL Editorial Staff: LEPIDOPTERA Keith Willmott, Editor Founded 1989 McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity Florida Museum of Natural History BOARD OF DIRECTORS University of Florida Jon D. Turner, Ardmore, TN, USA (Executive Director) [email protected] Charles V. Covell Jr., Gainesville, FL, USA Associate Editors: André V. L. Freitas (Brazil) John F. Douglass, Toledo, OH, USA Shinichi Nakahara (USA) Boyce A. Drummond, III, Ft. Collins, CO, USA Elena Ortiz-Acevedo (Colombia) Ulf Eitschberger, Marktleuthen, Germany Ryan St Laurent (USA) Gerardo Lamas, Lima, Peru Olaf H. H. Mielke, Curitiba, Brazil Keith R. Willmott, Gainesville, FL, USA VOLUME 31 (Supplement 2) July 2021 ISSUE INFORMATION Sanjay Sondhi, Tarun Karmakar, Yash Sondhi and Krushnamegh Kunte. 2021. Moths of Tale Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India with seventeen additions to the moth fauna of India (Lepidoptera: Heterocera). Tropical Lepidoptera Research 31(Supplement 2): 1-53. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5062572. Date of issue: 12 July 2021 Electronic copies (Online ISSN 2575-9256) in PDF format at: http://journals.fcla.edu/troplep
    [Show full text]
  • California Plant Pest & Disease Report Vol. 25
    California Plant Pest & Disease Report Volume 25 Covering Jan. 2008 - Dec. 2009 A Publication of the California Department of Food & Agriculture, Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch CALIFORNIA PLANT PEST & DISEASE REPORT Volume 25, Jan. 2008 - Dec. 2009 EDITORS Stephen Gaimari & Megan O’Donnell LAYOUT & DESIGN Megan O’Donnell CONTRIBUTORS Gevork Arakelian Martin Hauser Obediah Sage Charles Bellamy Fred Hrusa Sergei Subbotin Cheryl Blomquist Steven T. Koike Gillian Watson John Chitambar René Luna Jeanenne White Ke Dong Israfiel Mohammed Tongyan Tian Marc Epstein Megan O’Donnell Tim Tidwell Stephen Gaimari Suzanne Rooney-Latham Yunping Zhang Rosser Garrison Alessandra Rung Address correspondence concerning the CPPDR, including subscription and back issue requests, to: Editor, CPPDR Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, CA 95832-1448 1 2 5 Cover illustration: Megan O’Donnell, PPDC, CDFA. - 3 1) Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP) nymph; 2) Citrus flower; 3) lime fruit showing symp 4 Phototoms of credits: Citrus Greening Disease (HLB); 4) adult ACP; 5) HLB particles. 1)Jeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Bugwood.org; 2) Forest & Kim Starr, Starr Environmental, Bugwood.org; 3) Jeffrey W. Lotz; 4) M. E. Rogers, UF / IFAS / Citrus Research & Education Center; 5) Vol. 25 January 2008 - December 2009 Monique Garnier. CALIFORNIA PLANT PEST & DISEASE REPORT 1 CONTENTS Introduction 3 A, B, & Q Rated Detection & Interception Tables Significant Records in Botany
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Biodiversity: Planning a Study and Recommended Sampling Techniques
    Terrestrial Arthropod Biodiversity: Planning a Study and Recommended Sampling Techniques A Brief Prepared by the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) 1994 Scudder, G.G.E. in press. Ranking of inventory requirements for British Columbia terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates. B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Biological Survey of Canada Parks, Victoria. Commission biologique du Canada Snider, R.M and R.J. Snider. 1986. Evaluation of pit-trap transects with varied trap spacing in a northern Michigan forest. Great Lakes Entomologist 19: 51-61. Southwood, T.R.E. 1978. Ecological Methods, With Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Second edition. Chapman and Hall, London. 524 pp. Standing Committee on Environment. 1993. A Global Partnership. Canada and the Conventions of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). House of Commons, Issue No. 63. Thursday April 22, 1993. xviii + 133 pp. Published by the Steyskal, G.C., W.L. Murphy, and E.M. Hoover [Eds.]. 1986. Insects and mites: Tech- Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) niques for collection and preservation. United States Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1443. 103 pp. Ottawa 1994 Stork, N.E. 1988. Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35: 321-337. [Reprint edition 2007] Taylor, L.R. 1962. The absolute efficiency of insect suction traps. Annals of Applied Biology 50: 405-421. Taylor, L.R. and R.A. French. 1974. Effects of light-trap design and illumination on samples of moths in an English woodland. Bulletin of Entomological Research 63: Prepared by a subcommittee of the Survey: S.A.
    [Show full text]