DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitchell, A. B. 2014. Restoring Native Plant and Arthropod Communities In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitchell, A. B. 2014. Restoring Native Plant and Arthropod Communities In RESTORING NATIVE PLANT AND ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES IN GULF COASTAL PRAIRIES FOLLOWING PLANT INVASION AND DROUGHT by Adam Benjamin Mitchell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana July 2014 ©COPYRIGHT by Adam Benjamin Mitchell 2014 All Rights Reserved II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Andrea Litt, for her invaluable assistance in the conceptualization, development, and synthesis of the study. Her involvement and encouragement throughout this process is a testament to her ability as a mentor and as a scientist, and I am honored to have had the opportunity to begin my career under her guidance. I am grateful to my committee members, Drs. Laura Burkle, Jane Mangold, and Cathy Zabinski, for their expertise that helped develop many components of the study. I also would like to thank Anthony Falk and Forrest Smith of the South Texas Natives for their knowledge and contributions to the study, and hope that this research will provide them with future directions towards restoring native plants throughout southern Texas. I am grateful to the staff and fellows at the Welder Wildlife Foundation for their constant support, encouragement, and unshakable morale. I am honored to have called myself a Welder Wildlife Fellow. I thank my fellow graduate students, especially Dan Bachen, Stacy Davis, Ross Hinderer, Erin Kenison, and Mike Simanonok, for their insight, encouragement, patience, and friendships that are worth more than I can say. Last, but certainly not least, I wish to extend my sincerest thanks to my family for their support and patience through this arduous journey. This thesis is dedicated to the people that made me who I am today—my mother, for encouraging my love of the outdoors, and my father, whose footsteps I inadvertently followed into this project. Funding for this project was provided by: Montana State University, the Montana Institute on Ecosystems, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Welder Wildlife Foundation. III TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO THESIS ............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................... 8 2. SHIFTS IN COMPOSITION OF PLANT AND ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES FOLLOWING PLANT INVASION AND DROUGHT ............................................................ 16 Contributions of Authors and Co-Authors .................................................................... 16 Manuscript Information Page ........................................................................................ 17 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 18 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 19 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 23 Study Area ............................................................................................................. 23 Vegetation Sampling ............................................................................................. 24 Soil Sampling ......................................................................................................... 25 Arthropod Sampling .............................................................................................. 26 Precipitation .......................................................................................................... 29 Data Analysis ......................................................................................................... 29 Results ............................................................................................................................ 31 Precipitation .......................................................................................................... 31 Vegetation ............................................................................................................. 31 Soils ....................................................................................................................... 33 Arthropods ............................................................................................................ 33 Herbivores ................................................................................................. 34 Decomposers ............................................................................................ 35 Predators ................................................................................................... 35 Ants ........................................................................................................... 36 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 37 Herbivores ............................................................................................................. 38 Decomposers ........................................................................................................ 39 Predators ............................................................................................................... 41 Ants ....................................................................................................................... 42 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 43 Literature Cited .............................................................................................................. 59 IV TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED 3. MODIFYING SOIL PROPERTIES TO RESTORE NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITIES FOLLOWING PLANT INVASION AND DROUGHT ................................... 70 Contributions of Authors and Co-Authors .................................................................... 70 Manuscript Information Page ....................................................................................... 71 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 72 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 73 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 77 Study Area ............................................................................................................. 77 Field Study ............................................................................................................. 78 Treatment Application .......................................................................................... 79 Vegetation Sampling ............................................................................................. 80 Soil Sampling ......................................................................................................... 81 Precipitation .......................................................................................................... 81 Microcosm Study .................................................................................................. 82 Data Analysis ......................................................................................................... 83 Results ........................................................................................................................... 84 Precipitation .......................................................................................................... 84 Field Study ............................................................................................................. 84 Microcosm Study .................................................................................................. 86 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 87 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 93 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................... 102 4. SOIL MODIFICATION TO RESTORE NATIVE ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY PLANT INVASION AND DROUGHT ........................................................ 113 Contributions of Authors and Co-Authors .................................................................. 113 Manuscript Information Page ..................................................................................... 114 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 115 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 116 Methods ...................................................................................................................... 120 Study Area ........................................................................................................... 120 Treatment Application .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Notes and Descriptions of Two New Moths Phoretic on Spiny Pocket Mice in Costa Rica (Lepidoptera, Tineoidea)
    PROC. ENTOMOl. SOC. WASH. 88(1). 1986, pp. 98-109 NEOTROPICAL TlNEIDAE, U: BIOLOGICAL NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF TWO NEW MOTHS PHORETIC ON SPINY POCKET MICE IN COSTA RICA (LEPIDOPTERA, TINEOIDEA) DoNALD R. DAVIS, DALE H . CLAYTON, DANIEL H . J ANZEN, AND ANNE P. BROOKE (DRD) Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560; (DHC) Committee on Evo­ lutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, lIIinois 60637; (DHJ) De­ partment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191 04; (APB) Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Uni versity of Cali fomi a, Berkeley, California 94720. Abstract. - Two new species of tineid moths discovered riding on the backs of two species of spiny pocket mice (Heteromyidae) in Costa Rica are described. Amydria selvae. new species, was found on Heteromys desmarestianus Gray in the rainforest at Finca La Selva and Ptilopsaltis santarosae. new species, occurred on Liomys salvini (Thomas) in the dry forest at Santa Rosa National Park. Only female moths were observed and collected. Biological observations on both moths and their hosts in phoresy are summarized. Recent live-trapping of spiny pocket mice in Costa Rican forests has revealed the association of three species of ph ore tic moths of the family Tineidae. The life histories of the moths are still poorly understood and only the females are known to be phoretic. No males of any of the three species have been discovered. Exca­ vations of the burrows of the two species of spiny mice are now underway, which we hope will reveal not only the presence of males with associated immatures but also the larval biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Dynastinae)
    Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 61 (2017) 354–358 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE Entomologia A Journal on Insect Diversity and Evolution www.rbentomologia.com Systematics, Morphology and Biogeography Description of the third instar larva of Saccharoscaptus laminifer (Dechambre) (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Dynastinae) Miguel Ángel Morón Red de Biodiversidad y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa, Mexico a a b s t r a c t r t i c l e i n f o Article history: The larva of pentodontine S. laminifer is described for first time based on specimens collected under Received 4 April 2017 roots of sugarcane in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Diagnostic structures are illustrated and the differences and Accepted 17 July 2017 similarities with other previously described larvae of South American genera of Pentodontini are outlined. Available online 29 July 2017 A key to the larvae of some American genera of pentodontines is included. Associate Editor: Adriana Marvaldi © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Morphology Taxonomy Biology White grubs Sugarcane Introduction Material and methods In the Americas, the tribe Pentodontini includes 32 genera and The classification of families of Scarabaeoidea used in the 151 species that occur from southern Canada to Argentina, with present paper was proposed by Endrödi (1966) and updated by four genera and nine species in the West Indies (Endrödi, 1969, Morón (2010) and Cherman and Morón (2014). Terms and charac- 1985; Morón and Grossi, 2015; Ratcliffe and Cave, 2015; López- ters used in the description of larva are those of Ritcher (1966), García et al., 2016), but only the larvae of nine genera (Aphonus Morón (1987), and Morón et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Water Ripples Volume 7 Number 4
    For information contact: http://txmn.org/goodwater [email protected] Volume 7 Number 4 August/September 2018 Editor: Mary Ann Melton Fall Training Class Starts Soon Good Water Mas- ter Naturalist Fall Training Class will start Tuesday even- ing, September 4th. The class will meet UPCOMING EVENTS on Tuesday eve- nings from 6:00- 8/9/18 NPSOT 9:30 p.m. Some 8/13/18 WAG classes and field trips will be on Sat- 8/23/18 GWMN urdays. The first class is Tuesday, Austin Butterfly Forum 8/27/18 September 4. The 9/5/18 NPAT last class will be December 11. Cost is $150 and includes the comprehensive Texas Master 9/13/18 NPSOT Naturalist Program manual as well as a one year membership to the Good 9/20/18 Travis Audubon Water Chapter. For couples who plan to share the manual, there is a dis- count for the second student. 9/24/18 Austin Butterfly Forum Click here for online registration. The Tuesday classes will start at 6:00 9/27/18 GWMN p.m. and finish around 9:30. There are four Saturday field trips and classes planned. The schedule will be posted in the next week or so. Check back Check the website for additional here after August 15 for the link to the schedule. events including volunteer and training opportunities. The events Click here: https://txmn.org/goodwater/Training-class-online-application/ are too numerous to post here. for Online Training Registration David Robinson took our Spring Training Class this year. He says, "The Fall Training Class Starts Soon 1 Instructors & Speakers were absolutely fantastic.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION • WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 112 I960 Number 3431 LACE-BUG GENERA OF THE WORLD (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE) « By Carl J. Drake and Florence A. Ruhoff Introduction A treatise of the generic names of the family Tingidae from a global standpoint embodies problems similar to those frequently encountered in corresponding studies in other animal groups. The more im- portant criteria, including such basic desiderata as fixation of type species, synonyms, priority, and dates of technical publications implicate questions concomitant with recent trends toward the clarification and stabilization of zoological nomenclature. Zoogeography, predicated and authenticated on the generic level by the distribution of genera and species, is portrayed here by means of tables, charts, and maps of the tingifauna of the world. This visual pattern of distribution helps one to form a more vivid concept of the family and its hierarchic levels of subfamilies and genera. To a limited extent the data indicate distributional concentrations and probable centers of evolution and dispersal paths of genera. The phylogenetic relationship of genera is not discussed. The present treatise recognizes 216 genera (plus 79 synonyms, homonyms, and emendations) of the Tingidae of the world and gives 1 Research for this paper was supported In part by the National Science Foundation, grant No. 4095. 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 112 the figure of 1,767 as the approximate number of species now recog- nized. These figures, collated with similar categories in Lethierry and Severin (1896), show that there has been an increase of many genera and hundreds of species of Tingidae during the past three- quarters of a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Leafhopper Genera of the Alebroides Genus Group (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) from China, with a Key to Genera of the Group
    Entomological Science (2017) doi: 10.1111/ens.12260 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Two new leafhopper genera of the Alebroides genus group (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) from China, with a key to genera of the group Ye XU1,SihanLU1, Yuru WANG1, Christopher H. DIETRICH2 and Daozheng QIN1 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China and 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, USA Abstract Two new microleafhopper genera in the Alebroides genus group, Nulliata Lu, Xu & Qin, gen. nov., based on the type species N. rubrostriata Lu, Xu & Qin, sp. nov.,andInflatopina Lu, Dietrich & Qin, gen. nov., based on the type species I. intonsa Lu, Dietrich & Qin, sp. nov., are described from southwest China. Five known species in the Alebroides sohii species group are transferred to Inflatopina as new combinations. Keys to genera of the Alebroides genus group and species of Inflatopina are given. Key words: Auchenorrhyncha, microleafhopper, morphology, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION the cosmopolitan genus Empoasca Walsh, 1862). In contrast, the Alebroides group appears more stable in The microleafhopper tribe Empoascini comprises more classification, comprising 156 species in 25 genera so than 1,000 species in 85 previously described genera far, widely distributed in the Oriental, Palaearctic, from throughout the world. It can be distinguished from Afrotropical and Australian Regions but absent from other tribes of Typhlocybinae as follows: ocelli usually the New World (Xu et al. 2016). well developed; forewing without appendix; hind wing In China, the Alebroides group includes 14 genera and submarginal vein extended between apices of veins 58 species known to date (see checklist).
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Tingidae (Heteroptera) De Nicaragua
    ISSN 1021-0296 REVISTA NICARAGUENSE DE ENTOMOLOGIA N° 113. Diciembre 2016 Tingidae (Heteroptera) de Nicaragua. Por Jean-Michel Maes & Alex Knudson. PUBLICACIÓN DEL MUSEO ENTOMOLÓGICO ASOCIACIÓN NICARAGÜENSE DE ENTOMOLOGÍA LEON - - - NICARAGUA Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología. Número 113. 2016. La Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología (ISSN 1021-0296) es una publicación reconocida en la Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (Red ALyC) e indexada en los índices: Zoological Record, Entomológical Abstracts, Life Sciences Collections, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology and Review of Agricultural Entomology. Los artículos de esta publicación están reportados en las Páginas de Contenido de CATIE, Costa Rica y en las Páginas de Contenido de CIAT, Colombia. Todos los artículos que en ella se publican son sometidos a un sistema de doble arbitraje por especialistas en el tema. The Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología (ISSN 1021-0296) is a journal listed in the Latin-American Index of Scientific Journals. It is indexed in: Zoological Records, Entomológical, Life Sciences Collections, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology and Review of Agricultural Entomology. And reported in CATIE, Costa Rica and CIAT, Colombia. Two independent specialists referee all published papers. Consejo Editorial Jean Michel Maes Fernando Hernández-Baz Editor General Editor Asociado Museo Entomológico Universidad Veracruzana Nicaragua México José Clavijo Albertos Silvia A. Mazzucconi Universidad Central de Universidad de
    [Show full text]
  • Heteronychus Arator
    Heteronychus arator Scientific Name Heteronychus arator (Fabricius) Synonyms: Heteronychus arator australis Endrödi, Heteronychus indenticulatus Endrodi, Heteronychus madagassus Endrodi, Heteronychus sanctaehelenae Blanchard, Heteronychus transvaalensis Peringuey, Scarabaeus arator Fabricius Common Name(s) Black maize beetle, African black beetle, black lawn beetle, black beetle Type of Pest Beetle Figure 1. Illustration of each stage of the life Taxonomic Position cycle of the black maize beetle, showing a close up view of each stage and a Insecta, Coleoptera, Class: Order: background view showing that the eggs, Family: Scarabaeidae larvae, and pupae are all underground stages with the adults being the only stage Reason for Inclusion appearing above ground. Illustration CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List- courtesy of NSW Agriculture. http://www.ricecrc.org/Hort/ascu/zecl/zeck11 2006 – 2009 3.htm Pest Description Life stages are shown in Figures 1 and 2. 1 Eggs: White, oval, and measuring approximately 1.8 mm (approx. /16 in) long at time of oviposition. Eggs grow larger through development and become more 3 round in shape. Eggs are laid singly at a soil depth of 1 to 5 cm (approx. /8 to 2 in). Females each lay between 12 to 20 eggs total. In the field, eggs hatch after approximately 20 days. Larvae can be seen clearly with the naked eye (CABI, 2007; Matthiessen and Learmoth, 2005). Larvae: There are three larval instars. Larvae are creamy-white except for the brown head capsule and hind segments, which appear dark where the contents of the gut show through the body wall. The head capsule is smooth textured, 1 1 measuring 1.5 mm (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U
    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Spur-Throated Grasshoppers of the Canadian Prairies and Northern Great Plains
    16 Spur-throated grasshoppers of the Canadian Prairies and Northern Great Plains Dan L. Johnson Research Scientist, Grassland Insect Ecology, Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, [email protected] The spur-throated grasshoppers have become the most prominent grasshoppers of North Ameri- can grasslands, not by calling attention to them- selves by singing in the vegetation (stridulating) like the slant-faced grasshoppers, or by crackling on the wing (crepitating) like the band-winged grasshoppers, but by virtue of their sheer num- bers, activities and diversity. Almost all of the spur-throated grasshoppers in North America are members of the subfamily Melanoplinae. The sta- tus of Melanoplinae is somewhat similar in South America, where the melanopline Dichroplus takes the dominant role that the genus Melanoplus pated, and hiding in the valleys?) scourge that holds in North America (Cigliano et al. 2000). wiped out so much of mid-western agriculture in The biogeographic relationships are analysed by the 1870’s. Chapco et al. (2001). The grasshoppers are charac- terized by a spiny bump on the prosternum be- Approximately 40 species of grasshoppers in tween the front legs, which would be the position the subfamily Melanoplinae (mainly Tribe of the throat if they had one. This characteristic is Melanoplini) can be found on the Canadian grass- easy to use; I know elementary school children lands, depending on weather and other factors af- who can catch a grasshopper, turn it over for a fecting movement and abundance. The following look and say “melanopline” before grabbing the notes provide a brief look at representative next.
    [Show full text]