DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of the Statewide Aircraft Inventory for 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of the Statewide Aircraft Inventory for 2011 Development of the Statewide Aircraft Inventory for 2011 Final Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. May 13, 2019 ERG No. 0345.00.002 DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATEWIDE AIRCRAFT INVENTORY FOR 2011 TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-18-82508-19 Prepared for: Cody McLain Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Bldg. E, Room 335S Austin, Texas 78711-3087 Austin, TX Prepared by: Roger Chang Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 May 13, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose and Objectives ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Background ............................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Data Sources of Texas Airport Activities Inventoried ....................................... 3-1 3.1 National Data Sources of Texas Airport Activities ................................. 3-1 3.1.1 T-100 Dataset ............................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 TAF Dataset .................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 5010 Dataset ................................................................................. 3-2 3.2 Contacting Airports ................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.1 Summary of Local Data Received ................................................ 3-3 4.0 Summary of 2011 Emissions Development ....................................................... 4-1 4.1 Emission Estimation Methodology ........................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Aircraft Specific Estimation Methodology (AEDT) ..................... 4-1 4.1.2 Generic Emissions Estimating Procedures .................................. 4-2 4.1.3 Controlled and Uncontrolled 2011 Base Year Inventory ............. 4-3 4.1.4 Calculating Summer Daily Emissions .......................................... 4-3 4.2 Summary of Texas Airport Emissions .................................................... 4-4 5.0 References ........................................................................................................... 5-1 Appendix A TCEQ 2011 Activity Data (Including DFW Area Airports from NCTCOG) ............................................................................................................ A-1 Appendix B Projection Factors ..................................................................................... B-1 Appendix C Full County Controlled Emissions ............................................................ C-1 Appendix D Full County Uncontrolled Emissions ....................................................... D-1 Appendix E Quality Assurance ...................................................................................... E-1 i List of Tables Table 4-1. Emission Factors for Aircraft Types (pounds per LTO)9 ................................4-3 Table 4-2. 2011 Controlled and Uncontrolled Daily Criteria Emissions Compared to Previous Controlled (Tons Per Day) ............................................................................... 4-4 Table 4-3. Controlled Daily Criteria Emissions by Type (Tons Per Day) ....................... 4-4 Table 4-4. Uncontrolled Daily Criteria Emissions by Type (Tons Per Day) ................... 4-5 Table 4-5. Controlled Daily Criteria Emission for Top 25 Counties (Tons Per Day) ...... 4-5 Table 4-6. Uncontrolled Daily Criteria Emission for Top 25 Counties (Tons Per Day) 4-6 Appendix A TCEQ 2011 Activity Data (Including DFW Area Airports from NCTCOG) . A-1 Appendix C. Controlled Daily Criteria Emission by County (Tons Per Day) .................. C-1 Appendix D. Uncontrolled Daily Criteria Emission by County (Tons Per Day) ............ D-1 Table E-1. Counties with the Highest Absolute Percent Changes in Emissions ............ E-7 Table E-2. Airports with the Highest Absolute Percent Changes in Emissions Within the Previously Identified Counties ........................................................................................ E-8 Table E-3. Example Comparison for 2011 Inventory between AEDT and EDMS at the Airport, Aircraft, Engine, and Pollutant Level .............................................................. E-10 Table E-4. SCCs With the Highest Absolute Percent Change in Emissions Within the Previously Identified Airport/County Combinations .................................................... E-12 Table E-5. Airport/SCC Combinations Within the Top 25 Airports with the Highest Activity ............................................................................................................................ E-13 Table E-6. Comparison of Revised Military Criteria Emission Factors1 to the Previous Generic Military Emission Factors2 (tons/LTO)* ........................................................ E-20 Table E-7. Comparison to Confirm All Aircraft Were Included in the New Inventory E-21 Table E-8. Airports in the 2011 Inventory that were not included in the 2017 Inventory (closed) .......................................................................................................................... E-29 Table E-9. Airports (Opened) in 2017 That Did Not Have Activity in 2011 .................. E-31 Table E-10. Counties with The Highest Absolute Percent Changes in Emissions ....... E-42 Table E-11. Airports with the Highest Absolute Percent Changes in Emissions Within the Previously Identified Counties ...................................................................................... E-44 Table E-12. SCCs With the Highest Absolute Percent Change in Emissions Within the Previously Identified Airport/County Combinations ................................................... E-45 Table E-13. Airport/SCC Combinations Within the Top 25 Airports the Highest Activity ....................................................................................................................................... E-46 Table E-14. Comparison to Confirm All Aircraft Were Included in AEDT Run .......... E-54 Table E-15. Comparison of Controlled and Uncontrolled 2017 Emissions ................... E-61 Table E-16. Counties with the Highest Absolute Percent Changes in Emissions ........ E-62 Table E-17. Airports with the Highest Absolute Percent Changes in Emissions Within the Previously Identified Counties. ............................................................................... E-63 Table E-18. SCCs With the Highest Absolute Percent Change in Emissions Within the Previously Identified Airport/County Combinations. .................................................. E-64 ii Table E-19. Airport/SCC Combinations Within the Top 26 Airports the Highest Activity. .......................................................................................................................... E-65 Table E-20. Comparison to Confirm All Aircraft Were Included in AEDT Run .......... E-72 Table E-21. Comparison of Controlled and Uncontrolled 2020 Emissions ................. E-79 List of Figures Figure 2-1. Landing and Takeoff Cycle ............................................................................ 2-3 Figure 4-1. 2011 Activity by County (LTOs) ..................................................................... 4-7 iii 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this study is to develop a set of average summer weekday (tons per day) emission inventories (EI) for Texas airport activities based on a 2011 base year. Eastern Research Group (ERG) developed emissions inventories for criteria and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The inventories will be used to support the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and other airport-related inquiries. The emissions associated with airport activities are attributed to the following sources with associated source classification codes (SCC): Commercial aviation (SCC: 2275020000) Air taxis . Piston driven (SCC: 2275060011) . Turbine driven (SCC: 2275060012) General aviation . Piston driven (SCC: 2275050011) . Turbine driven (SCC: 2275050012) Military (SCC: 2275001000) Auxiliary Power Units (SCC: 2275070000) Ground Support Equipment . Compressed natural gas (CNG)-fueled (SCC: 2268008005) . Diesel-fueled (SCC: 2270008005) . Gasoline-fueled (SCC: 2265008005) . Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)-fueled (SCC: 2267008005). To estimate emissions from these sources, ERG used the original activity data obtained for Work Order 582-11-99776-FY12-09 for calendar year 2011 which included local airport data and publicly available activity data. Additionally, ERG, via TCEQ, also obtained local aircraft specific data from the DFW area from the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) during the previous work order as well. Two approaches were used to estimate emissions from the compiled activity data. For activity data that included aircraft-specific data, ERG used the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) to estimate emissions. If such detailed data were not available, ERG applied a more general approach for different aircraft types (i.e., air taxis, general aviation, and military aircraft) using the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “I Have the Fokker in Sight!”
    “I have the Fokker in sight!” After some delays caused by tropical cyclone “Gita” the first of our two Fokker F27 Friendship aircraft arrived from New Zealand on Monday 27 February. Now registered VH-EWH, the Friendship departed Auckland on Sunday 26 February, stopping to refuel at Norfolk Island before proceeding to Coolangatta to clear customs. The intention was to proceed to Wollongong that same day, but bad weather in the Illawarra dictated an overnight stay at Coolangatta. The second aircraft will be ferried sometime in the next few months. In Australian service the Fokker F27 Friendship was operated from the late 1950’s by many of the domestic and regional airlines. Some of the Australian airlines which operated the type include Trans Australia Airlines, Ansett ANA, East West, Queensland Airlines, Bill Peach’s Aircruising Australia and Airlines of NSW. The type was also operated by the Department of Civil Aviation and CSIRO. The Fokker F27 was developed during the early 1950’s and was intended to compete with or replace piston engine aircraft such as the DC-3. It uses Rolls Royce Dart turboprop engines, is pressurised and, in typical configuration seats around 50 passengers. Our F27s were most recently in service with a company that provided services to New Zealand Post and our Kiwi readers would be well familiar with the sight and unique sounds of the F27s as they made their way around the mail runs. Convair CV-440 progress The return to flight project for our Convair CV-440 made significant progress this month with completion of the new engine installation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-SR20-Domestic-Pricelist.Pdf
    2017 $389,900 Base weight 2120 lbs | Useful Load 1030 lbs Cabin payload with 3 hr. trip fuel and 45 min. reserve 776 lbs. SR20 STANDARD FEATURES AIRFRAME & POWERPLANT AVIONICS Lycoming IO-390-C3B6 215 HP Engine Cirrus Perspective+™ by Garmin® Cockpit Cirrus Airframe Parachute System® (CAPS®) 10” Screens 3-Blade Propeller GMA 350c All-Digital Bluetooth® Audio Panel Airbag Seatbelts (Front Seats) QWERTY Keyboard Controller Single Movement Power Lever Dual WAAS GPS/Comm/Nav Radios Dual Side Yoke Engine & Fuel Monitoring 60/40 Flex Seating™ Seats up to 5 Garmin Pilot – 1 year subscription included Four USB Power Ports Dual Alternators Advanced Wheel Fairings 406 MHz ELT High Performance Brakes ADS-B In Weather & Traffic Tubeless Tires ADS-B Out Transponder Surface Illumination Lights FliteCharts® & SafeTaxi® *US only. Subscription required. Spectra™ Wingtip Lighting GFC 700 Autopilot including Standard Leather Interior Electronic Stability & Protection (ESP) Tinted Windows Dual ADAHRS 2 Year Spinner-to-Tail Warranty Hypoxia Check/Automated Descent Mode Blue Level Button Autopilot Stall Protection TRAINING 3 Day Transition Training Package SR20 PACKAGES CIRRUS SELECT $39,900 Cirrus Select adds the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) displayed on big 12” screens and eTAWS2. EVS creates an image of what is outside the aircraft by using infrared technology to turn night into day. eTAWS is a TAWS-B terrain warning system with greater predictive precision information based on your flight path, and if terrain is ahead, gives you early warning aural alerts. Weight Δ: 5 lbs. ALERTS, AWARENESS & ASSISTANCE $28,900 Fly with increased precision and awareness with Synthetic Vision Technology (SVT™).
    [Show full text]
  • MSP 2019 Annual Noise Contour Report Metropolitan Airports Commission
    Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2019 Annual Noise Contour Report Comparison of the 2019 Actual and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contours February 2020 MAC Community Relations Office and HNTB Corporation MSP 2019 Annual Noise Contour Report Metropolitan Airports Commission Table of Contents ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 ES.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 AIRPORT NOISE LITIGATION AND CONSENT DECREE .............................................................. 1 ES.3 MSP 2020 IMPROVEMENTS EA/EAW ..................................................................................... 2 ES.4 THE AMENDED CONSENT DECREE ......................................................................................... 2 ES.5 2019 NOISE CONTOURS ......................................................................................................... 3 ES.6 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY ............................................................. 3 ES.7 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM MITIGATION STATUS ............................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 9 1.1 CORRECTIVE LAND USE EFFORTS TO ADDRESS AIRCRAFT NOISE ............................................ 9 1.2 2007 FORECAST CONTOUR .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Top Turboprop Series: We Compare Popular Pre-Owned Models
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT SEPTEMBER 2019 $3.95 US VOLUME 23 NUMBER 9 Top Turboprop Series: We Compare Popular Pre-Owned Models Five Questions The Latest on One Pilot’s with Corporate the Cessna Denali Introduction Angel Network & SkyCourier to Aerobatics Jet It US One year $15.00, two years $29.00 Canadian One year $24.00, two years $46.00 Overseas One Year $52.00, Two Years $99.00 Single copies $6.50 PRIVATE. FAST. SMART. EDITOR Rebecca Groom Jacobs SEPTEMBER2019 • VOL. 23, NO. 9 (316) 641-9463 Contents [email protected] EDITORIAL OFFICE 2779 Aero Park Drive 4 Traverse City, MI 49686 Editor’s Briefing Phone: (316) 641-9463 E-mail: [email protected] 2 A Career Shaped by Turboprops PUBLISHER by Rebecca Groom Jacobs Dave Moore PRESIDENT Position Report Dave Moore 4 What Makes a Turboprop CFO Safer? Answer: You Rebecca Mead PRODUCTION MANAGER by Dianne White Mike Revard PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR Jake Smith GRAPHIC DESIGNER Marci Moon 6 TWIN & TURBINE WEBSITE 6 Top Turboprop Series: www.twinandturbine.com Pre-Owned Piper Meridian ADVERTISING DIRECTOR and Daher TBM 700C2 John Shoemaker Twin & Turbine by Joe Casey 2779 Aero Park Drive Traverse City, MI 49686 12 Five on the Fly with Phone: 1-800-773-7798 Corporate Angel Network Fax: (231) 946-9588 [email protected] by Rebecca Groom Jacobs ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR & REPRINT SALES 14 The Latest on the Betsy Beaudoin Cessna Denali and Phone: 1-800-773-7798 [email protected] SkyCourier ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE by Rich Pickett ASSISTANT Jet It Erika Shenk 22 Intro to Aerobatics Phone: 1-800-773-7798 by Jared Jacobs [email protected] SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Rhonda Kelly Diane Smith Jamie Wilson Molly Costilow 22 Kelly Adamson P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Warbirds Over Wanaka the Pearse Project Cirrus Adventure: the Long Way to Brisbane
    KiwiFlyer TM Magazine of the New Zealand Aviation Community Issue 45 2016 #2 $ 6.90 inc GST ISSN 1170-8018 Warbirds Over Wanaka The Pearse Project Cirrus Adventure: The long way to Brisbane Products, Services, News, Events, Warbirds, Recreation, Training and more. KiwiFlyer Issue 45 2016 #2 From the Editor In this issue Welcome to KiwiFlyer #45. We hope you’ll find 7. The Pearse Project plenty of good reading within. Ivan Mudrovich has spent more than a decade creating a faithful interpretation of Richard There’s more than a few owners of GA and Pearse’s 1903 aircraft. Chris Gee attended the recreational aircraft who will have thought at some attempts to get it airborne. time “I could fly to Australia”. And then added “if I wanted to” and then left it at that. Satisfying 10. Cirrus Adventure: The long way to Brisbane to think that you could, but in reality all a bit too Lance Weller wanted to relocate his Cirrus from risky and difficult, and for that matter, hardly cost NZ to Brisbane and chose a route through efficient. Albeit that Lance Weller had the additional Noumea and PNG. He tells the adventure here. motive of relocating his Cirrus to Brisbane, Lance is indeed someone who headed off on an international 16. EAA AirVenture Oshkosh with Gaye Pardy flight(s) ‘because he could’. Far from taking the This years Gaye Pardy Travel tour to Oshkosh traditional route via Norfolk and Lord Howe Islands, will be their 30th. All aviation enthusiasts should Lance and co-pilot Garth Jensen made the journey go at least once.
    [Show full text]
  • Repair Capabilities List
    Repair Capabilities List Eaton P/N Customer P/N Nomenclature Aircraft Usage Repair Capabilities Comments 100000-14 N/A Linear Actuator Lockheed C-130 Yes 100000-29 N/A Actuator Embraer EMB120 Yes 100000-60 N/A Linear Actuator Fokker F28 MK0070; F28 MK0100 Yes 100000-77 2045352 Actuator, Embraer EMB-500 Yes Electromechanical Linear 100100-1 030A-989504-1 Actuator Aileron Mitsubishi MU-2B, -26A, -36A, -40, -60 Yes 102000-1 N/A Actuator Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear Assembly 102000-2 N/A Actuator, Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Page 1 of 43 Eaton P/N Customer P/N Nomenclature Aircraft Usage Repair Capabilities Comments 102000-3 560254-503 Actuator Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear Assembly 102000-4 560254-505 Actuator, Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear 102000-7 560254-507 Actuator, Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear 102000-9 N/A Linear Actuator N/A Yes 102000-10 N/A Actuator Assembly, Mooney M20 Yes Linear 102000-12 N/A Actuator Assembly, N/A Yes Main Landing Gear 102000-13 N/A Actuator, Landing Mooney Yes Gear Assembly 104500-1 N/A Linear Actuator Gulfstream Yes Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Page 2 of 43 Eaton P/N Customer P/N Nomenclature Aircraft Usage Repair Capabilities Comments 104500-2 N/A Linear Actuator Gulfstream Yes 105900-2 159SCC100-23 Trim Control Linear Gulfstream GIII, GIV, and GV Yes Actuator 114000-1 N/A Actuator, Rotary Cessna Citation Yes Approved through Direct Shipment Authorization - Expires 9/14/13 114000-3 N/A Actuator, Rotary Cessna Citation Yes 116900-2 N/A Linear Actuator Fokker F27 MK050 Yes 116900-3 N/A Door
    [Show full text]
  • AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Cessna 208 Caravan: Registration – 8R-GAB at Matthews Ridge Airstrip Region No
    AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Cessna 208 Caravan: Registration – 8R-GAB At Matthews Ridge Airstrip Region No. 1 Guyana 07 29 13.30N 060 11.17.10W 9th January, 2015. REPORT # GCAA: 2/5/1/78 This report represents the conclusions reached by the Guyana Aircraft Accident Investigation Team on the circumstances surrounding the aircraft accident, involving Guyana registered aircraft – Cessna 208, 8R-GAB. This investigation was done in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The investigation is intended neither to apportion blame, nor to assess individual or collective liability. Its sole objective is to draw lessons from the occurrence which may help to prevent future accidents. Consequently, the use of this report for any purpose other than for the prevention of future accidents could lead to erroneous conclusions. 1 Contents ABBREVIATIONS and GLOSSARY.......................................................................................................... 4 SYNOPSIS ................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 7 1.1. History of the Flight .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Injuries to Persons............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Day Presentation
    Meggitt Investor Day Stephen Young, Chief Executive 19 April 2016 Disclaimer This presentation is not for release, publication or distribution, directly or This presentation includes statements that are, or may be deemed to be, indirectly, in or into any jurisdiction in which such publication or distribution is “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements can be unlawful. identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms This presentation is for information only and shall not constitute an offer or “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “expects”, “aims”, “continues”, “intends”, solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities, nor shall there be any sale or “may”, “plans”, “considers”, “projects”, “should” or “will”, or, in each case, their purchase of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale negative or other variations or comparable terminology, or by discussions of would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of strategy, plans, objectives, goals, future events or intentions. These forward- any such jurisdiction. It is solely for use at an investor presentation and is looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. By their provided as information only. This presentation does not contain all of the nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty, because they information that is material to an investor. By attending the presentation or by relate to future events and circumstances. Forward-looking statements may, reading the presentation slides you agree to be bound as follows:- and often do, differ materially from actual results. This presentation has been organised by Meggitt PLC (the “Company”) in order In relation to information about the price at which securities in the Company to provide general information on the Company.
    [Show full text]
  • CONQUEST II Inspections and Upgrades Will Cost You, but You’Ll Wind up with a Highly Efficient Twin-Engine Turboprop
    USED JET REVIEW CESSNA 441 CONQUEST II inspections and upgrades will cost you, but you’ll wind up with a highly efficient twin-engine turboprop _by Mark Huber T F A R C R I A A N S S E C 44 I BJT october_november 2008 USED JET REVIEW economics HOURLY DIRECT OPERATING COSTS – Fuel ($5.92 per gal): $526.88 – Maintenance labor (at $81 per hour): $192.88 – Parts, airframe, engine, avionics: $146.52 – Inspections, component overhauls, engine restoration: $138.44 – Misc. expenses Landing and parking fees: $8.13 Crew expenses: $30 Supplies & catering: $24 TOTAL VARIABLE FLIGHT COSTS PER HOUR: $1,111.31 Average speed: 270 knots THE CESSNA 441’S CABIN N O – Cost per nautical mile: $4.12 I T A HAS EXECUTIVE SEATING FOR I V A ANNUAL FIXED OPERATING COSTS SEVEN, THOUGH YOU CAN R A T S CRAM IN 11 PASSENGERS. – Crew salaries (estimates) T S E Captain: $79,300 W Copilot: $41,200 Benefits: $36,150 AIRPLANES COME APART IN MIDAIR for a variety of 404 and the 421–into turboprops. The 441 is the larg- – Hangar rental (typical): $20,900 reasons. An errant pilot loses control or flies a model er of the two; the other is the Model 425 Conquest I. – Insurance (insured hull value = $1.735 million) past its design limit, or unrepaired cracks and corro- The 441 has executive seating for seven, although you Hull (1.02% of value): $17,697 sion cause structure to fail. Fortunately, rigorous pilot can cram in nine passengers; it also has a top speed Admitted liability: $4,000 training and aircraft maintenance standards make of 295 knots–higher with a popular engine modifica- Legal liability: $12,250 such events few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020 Vol
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION OPERATORS SURVEY GULFSTREAM G500 AIREON IN SERVICE ADJUSTING APPROAC NOVEMBER 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation OPERATORS SURVEY Gulfstream G500 A step change in aircraft design H SPEED NOVEMBER 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 10 H SPEED NOVEMBER 2020 VOL. 116 NO. ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Aireon in Service Winter Ground Ops Adjusting Approach Speed Flying Petri Dish C&C: Stop. Look. Think. Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Washoe County Emissions Inventory Page I
    WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA 2011 PERIODIC EMISSIONS INVENTORY November 2012 Prepared by: Ms. Yann Ling-Barnes, P.E. Mr. Craig A. Petersen Mr. Brendan Schnieder Washoe County Health District Air Quality Management Division P.O. Box 11130 Reno, Nevada 89520 This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Air Quality Management Division of the Washoe County Health District wishes to extend its appreciation to the following organizations and local agencies for their assistance in completing this emission inventory: Amtrak City of Reno Fire Department City of Reno, Reno/Stead Water Reclamation Facility City of Sparks Fire Department City of Reno Public Works Department City of Sparks Public Works Department Incline Village General Improvement District North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District NV Energy Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority Sierra Fire Protection District Southwest Gas Cooperation State of Nevada, Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Petroleum Technology State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Protection State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry State of Nevada, Department of Motor Vehicles and Public Safety State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of State Lands State of Nevada, Department of Transportation The Nature Conservancy Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility Union Pacific Railroad United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca District United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge United States Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Washoe County, Department of Community Development Washoe County, Department of Public Works Washoe County, Department of Water Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Hold for Release Until July 21, 2017 Wipaire's Laser Gear Advisory
    WIPLINE FLOATS • SKIS • MODIFICATIONS • AIRCRAFT SALES AVIONICS • INTERIOR • MAINTENANCE • PAINT REFINISHING Hold For Release Until July 21, 2017 Wipaire’s Laser Gear Advisory System Now Standard and Available for Retrofit South Saint Paul, Minnesota, July 21, 2017 – Wipaire, Inc.’s exclusive, safety-enhancing Laser Gear Advisory system is now included at no additional cost on new Wipline float purchases, and is available for retrofit on Wipline-equipped aircraft. Introductory pricing for retrofit kits is $4,995 uninstalled. The laser system may be installed at one of Wipaire’s two locations in South St. Paul, Minnesota, or Leesburg, Florida. Installation is $1,300-$1,500 depending upon aircraft model. “Designing exclusive, innovative product improvements has always been at the heart of what we do,” commented Clint Clouatre, Vice President of Marketing and Sales for Wipaire, Inc. “The Laser Gear Advisory system continues that tradition by enhancing the safety of Wipline floats. It gives busy pilots intelligent alerts of incorrect gear settings instead of repetitive statements that become easy to ignore. Utilizing laser technology accurate over various terrains, our new Laser Gear Advisory decreases the chance of an accident due to improper gear position.” Wipaire’s Amphibian Gear Advisory system, well-known for its “Gear is up for water landing” and “Gear is down for runway landing” annunciations, has long been standard equipment on all amphibious Wipline floats. The Laser Gear Advisory system, in contrast, remains quiet when the landing gear and detected surface are in agreement. The laser becomes active at approximately 400 feet above ground level and compares the gear position with the detected landing surface.
    [Show full text]