DOCSLIB.ORG

Settlement Pattenrs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Settlement Pattenrs GROWTH OF THE KOREAN POPULATION AND CHANGES IN THEIR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OVER TIME, 1990-2008 Pyong Gap Min Queens College and the Graduate Center of CUNY and Chigon Kim Wright State University RESEARCH CENTER FOR KOREAN COMMUNITY QUEENS COLLEGE OF CUNY Research Report No.2 March 16, 2010 0 I: Introductory Remarks The first research report released on December 3, 2009 includes the senior author’s review of the literature on Korean American studies and an expanded bibliography. Many readers have sent me e-mail and telephone messages, telling me that it is very useful to them. The second research report focuses on analyzing changes in Korean Americans’ settlement patters between 1990 and 2008. The first research report may be more useful to graduate students and scholars conducting research on Korean Americans than to lay Korean Americans. Data included in this report focusing on changes in growth in the Korean population in the United States and settlement patterns among Korean Americans between 1990 and 2008 are likely to be more useful to non- academic practitioners--community leaders, owners of businesses largely to catering Korean customers, including Korean restaurants and real estate agencies, social serve agencies, the Korean Consulate Generals in major Korean population centers, and the Korean government. From the beginning of the census enumeration, the U.S. Census Bureau did not include any question about religion because American forefathers were afraid of the possibility that information about religion was used for persecution of minority religious groups. For the same reason, the U.S. Census has continued to ask no question about religion. This means that religious groups like Jewish Americans and Muslims cannot find official statistics about their own groups. Due to the absence of data about its own group in census reports, the Jewish American community has conducted a large-scale 1 National Jewish Population Surveys every ten years. The most recent National Jewish Population Survey, conducted for twelve months between August 2000 and August 2001, interviewed about 2,500 Jewish respondents by telephone. Not only to interview 2,500 Jewish households, but also to screen Jewish households from the randomly selected households, the research team spent a great deal of time and money. The Jewish community has conducted many other large surveys, such as the American Jewish Identity Survey. The Korean community does not have to conduct a national Korean American survey involving high costs and energy and a great deal of time because the U.S. Census Bureau includes questions about race and Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic origin. We are lucky to get major statistics about our population size and population characteristics from census data, the largest survey data available in the United States. Until 2000, the U.S. Census Bureau had conducted the major censuses involving a short form and a long form every ten years. But, from 2001 on, it has conducted the American Community Survey every year, replacing the earlier long form. It will continue the decennial census involving a short form every ten years, thus taking another decennial census this March. Since the American Community Survey involving a long form has a small sample size (2.6%) compared to the decennial census, we cannot enumerate the Korean population size and settlement patterns accurately at this point. Nevertheless, we may be able to provide a glimpse of the direction of changes in Korean Americans’ settlement patterns using the most recent American Community Survey available. Thus we decided to analyze the 2008 American Community Survey compared to the 2000 and 1990 2 Censuses for our center’s Second Research Report, instead of waiting for the 2010 decennial census. But we present major findings about changes in Korean Americans’ settlement patterns from the 2008 American Community Survey with much caution. We should be able to determine whether major changes in Koreans’ settlement patterns discerned from the 2008 American Community Survey will hold true when results of the 2010 Census are available in 2012. We did not need census data to complete the First Research Report, providing an annotated bibliography, published and released last December. But the current (Second) and most of the following Research Reports to be released by our center will be based on census data, especially American Community Surveys conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau every year. As already pointed out, the American Community Survey for a single year does not have a sample large enough for statistical analysis on the Korean population. But we can combine three or five years of the American Community Surveys to increase the sample size. Using the combined American Community Surveys, we can not only estimate Korean population size and settlement patterns, but also examine population characteristics. In this report, we used the 2008 American Community Survey, along with the 1970, 1980 and 1990 decennial censuses for the population estimation and settlement patterns. We used the 2005-2007 Combined American Community Surveys to examine Korean population characteristics. The current research report consists of four different sections. The first section including two tables and two figures show the growth of the Korean population in the United States between 1970 and 2008 and the foreign-born 3 and native-born distributions for single-race and multi-racial Korean populations. The second section examines changes in Korean Americans’ settlement patterns by looking at changes in the proportions of the Korean population in major metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2008. Three tables and two figures are provided in this section. The third section looks at changes in the Korean population in the New York-New Jersey CMSA (Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area), New York City boroughs and adjacent suburban counties, and Flushing-Bayside Korean enclaves in Queens Professor Chigon Kim of Wright State University is an expert in analyzing census data. As a data analyst of our center he did all data analyses for this research report. He will continue to analyze census data for our center for the coming research reports and other major survey studies our center will conduct in the future. Prof. Kim may be the only Korean sociologist in the United States who can undertake analyzing census data with such efficiency and accuracy. As Director of the center, I feel lucky to find such an ideal data analyst for the center. II: Growth of the Korean Population and the Foreign-Born vs. Native-Born Distribution Figure 1 below provides a general picture of the Korean population growth in the United States between 1970 and 2008. Table 1 gives statistics for the Korean population in different decennial years and 2008. The 1970s Census counted less than 70,000 Koreans in the United States. Assuming the Census underestimated the Korean population, the actual number may have been a little more than 70,000 in 1970. Given that the total number of Koreans who immigrated to the United States between 1903 and 1969 is 4 approximately 42,200 (Barringer, Gardner and Levin 1995: 24-25), the Korean population can be said to have achieved a high level of natural growth. Figure 1. Growth of Korean Population, 1970-2008 Sources: U.S. Bureau of Census, 1970, 1990, 2000, 2008. Congress passed the new liberalized immigration laws in 1965, abolishing the earlier race-based discriminatory immigration laws. The 1965 Immigration Act began to be in full effect in 1968. As a result of the enforcement of the new Immigration Act, the Korean population achieved a five-fold increase in the 1970s, from 69,150 in 1970 to 354,953 in 1980. It further increased to approximately 800,000 in 1990, achieving a two- 5 fold increase in the the1980s. Beginning from the 2000 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau allowed the respondents with mixed racial and ethnic backgrounds (children of intermarried parents) to choose two or more racial and ethnic categories. As a result, we have two separate figures of the Korean population for 2000 and 2008, for those who chose the Korean category alone (“Korean alone”) and those who chose the Korean category and one or more additional categories (“Korean in Combination”). In 1990 and before, children of Korean-other intermarried couples chose either the Korean, the other racial-ethic category of the non-Korean parent, or “others.” Thus, approximately 800,000 Korean Americans counted by the 1990 Census must have included a moderate number of multiracial/multi-ethnic Koreans. Table 1: Growth of Korean Population, 1970-2008 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 Korean Alone 69,150 354,593 798,849 1,076,872 1,372,152 (87.7%) (89.6%) Korean in XX XX XX 151,555 160,033 Combination (12.3%) (10.4%) Total 69,150 354,593 798,849 1,228,427 1,532,185 (100.0%) (100.0%) Source: U.S. Bureau of Census (1970, 1990, 2000, 2008). Note: The Korean American population in 2008 is estimated from the 2008 American Community Survey. The single-race Korean population in 2008 was approximately 1.4 million, about 300,000 (27.4%) increase from 1,077,000 in 2000. Including about 160,000 multiracial Koreans, the total Korean population in 2008 was over 1.5 million. Single-race Korean Americans comprised the fifth largest Asian group, following the Chinese (2,998,849), 6 Indian (2,495,998), Filipino (2,425,697) and Vietnamese (1,431,980) groups. Among six major Asian groups, only the Japanese population (710,063) is smaller than the Korean population. The Chinese population is more than twice as large as the Korean population. The significant reduction of the Korean immigration flow since the late 1980s (see Min 2006a) has been the major factor for the slower increase in the Korean population relative to other Asian populations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And “What I Am Not”: Asians and Asian Americans in Contention and Conversation by Heekyong Teresa Pyon, Yan Cao, and Huey-Li Li
    College of Education v University of Hawai‘i at Mänoa 1 Between “What I Am” and “What I Am Not”: Asians and Asian Americans in Contention and Conversation by Heekyong Teresa Pyon, Yan Cao, and Huey-li Li In the age of globalization, “Asian” and “Asian American” Just the other day, my mother visited Joshua, and again she told have emerged as popular terms to refer to a diverse populace Joshua that he needs to speak Korean when he grows up. This time, originating in many different parts of the vast continent of Asia. however, Joshua gave my mother an unexpected answer. “Grandma. As recent Asian arrivals in the United States, we have gradually There is an older brother in my church. He speaks little Korean and a come to accept the terms “Asian” and “Asian American,” as our lot of English. I think I am going to be like him later, and I am going group identity in spite of our different national origins and cultural to be an American when I grow up.” Surprised, my mother told him, upbringings. However, we continue to engage in a mutual interroga- “No, Joshua, you are still a Korean even when you grow up.” “No,” tion with the dominant culture that endorses individuality as a key insisted little Joshua, “I am going to be an American!” value, yet imposes group identities on its marginal constituencies. Unlike my nephew, I was certain that I would never become While the multicultural education movement has raised awareness an American when I was new to the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Sa-I-Gu: Twenty Years After the Los Angeles Riots
    【특집】 Confronting Sa-i-gu: Twenty Years after the Los Angeles Riots Edward Taehan Chang (the Young Oak Kim Center for Korean American Studies) Twenty years ago on April 29, Los Angeles erupted and Koreatown cried as it burned. For six-days, the LAPD was missing in action as rioting, looting, burning, and killing devastated the city. The “not guilty” Rodney King verdict ignited anger and frustration felt by South Los Angeles residents who suffered from years of neglect, despair, hopelessness, injustice, and oppression.1) In the Korean American community, the Los Angeles riot is remembered as Sa-i-gu (April 29 in Korean). Korean Americans suffered disproportionately high economic losses as 2,280 Korean American businesses were looted or burned with $400 million in property damages.2) Without any political clout and power in the city, Koreatown was unprotected and left to burn since it was not a priority for city politicians and 1) Rodney King was found dead in his own swimming pool on June 17, 2012, shortly after publishing his autobiography The Riot Within: My Journey from Rebellion to Redemption Learning How We Can All Get Along, in April 2012. 2) Korea Daily Los Angeles, May 11, 1992. 2 Edward Taehan Chang the LAPD. For the Korean American community, Sa-i-gu is known as its most important historical event, a “turning point,” “watershed event,” or “wake-up call.” Sa-i-gu profoundly altered the Korean American discourse, igniting debates and dialogue in search of new directions.3) The riot served as a catalyst to critically examine what it meant to be Korean American in relation to multicultural politics and race, economics and ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • From an Ethnic Island to a Transnational Bubble: a Reflection on Korean Americans in Los Angeles
    Asian and Asian American Studies Faculty Works Asian and Asian American Studies 2012 From an Ethnic Island to a Transnational Bubble: A Reflection on Korean Americans in Los Angeles Edward J.W. Park Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/aaas_fac Part of the East Asian Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Edward J.W. Park (2012) From an Ethnic Island to a Transnational Bubble: A Reflection on orK ean Americans in Los Angeles, Amerasia Journal, 38:1, 43-47. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Asian and Asian American Studies at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Asian and Asian American Studies Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From an Ethnic Island to a Transnational Bubble Transnational a to Island an Ethnic From So much more could be said in reflecting on Sa-I-Gu. My main goal in this brief essay has simply been to limn the ways in which the devastating fires of Sa-I-Gu have produced a loamy and fecund soil for personal discovery, community organizing, political mobilization, and, ultimately, a remaking of what it means to be Korean and Asian in the United States. From an Ethnic Island to a Transnational Bubble: A Reflection on Korean Americans in Los Angeles Edward J.W. Park EDWARD J.W. PARK is director and professor of Asian Pacific American Studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of New York City's Korean Americans
    Profile of New York City’s Korean Americans Introduction Using data from 2006-2010 and 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) Selected Population Tables and the 2010 U.S. census, this profile outlines characteristics and trends among New York City’s Korean American population.1 It presents statistics on population size and changes, immigration, citizenship status, educational attainment, English ability, income, poverty, health insurance and housing. Comparisons with New York City’s general population are provided for context. New York City’s Korean population was the third largest Asian ethnic group, behind Chinese and Indians. Relative to all residents, Koreans in New York City were more likely to be: working-age adults, Figure 1: Korean Population by Borough better educated, Population limited English proficient, From 2010 to 2015, the Korean alone or in combination living in poverty if an adult, and population in New York City decreased slightly by 0.2 renting. percent from 98,402 to 98,158 – compared to the city’s Facts on Korean Population in New York City overall 4 percent increase and the 13 percent growth of Alone or in-Combination Population 98,158 Percent Change from 2010 to 2015 -0.2% the total Asian population. The Korean alone population Immigration and Citizenship decreased by 1.5 percent from 93,131 in 2010 to 91,729 Percent of Population Foreign Born 70% in 2015. Percent of Foreign Born Who are Citizens 48% New York City was home to 67 percent of New York Educational Attainment for Adults Age 25 or Older State’s Korean residents.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Mixed Korean America*
    304 Gage Chapter 13 In Search of Mixed Korean America* Sue-Je Lee Gage Borders are policed on both sides. Someone who walks between and in and out of national and institutional borders draws attention to the arbi- trariness of divisions and to the vested interest of gatekeepers. Shirley Geok-Lin Lim, Among the White Moon Faces (1996) ⸪ Raised in the inner cities of Los Angeles and Indianapolis, my siblings and I were familiar with racism, classism, and sexism from an early age. Our mother, a Korean immigrant and single parent, brought us up in poor, urban, mostly African American communities. The Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War were still on people’s minds at that time in the early 1970s. The complexi- ties of what it meant to be “American” and “Korean,” not fully one or the other, were difficult for a mixed-race kid. My mother and her experiences—in the Korea she left, the United States she dreamed of, and the Korean American community she desired to be part of—mark my beginnings. We were excluded from the privileges of “white” society not just because we were “Oriental,” but because we were different and not white. Despite the Korean War from 1950 to 1953, most of the people we encountered had never heard of Korea. Koreans shamed us and treated us harshly because we were poor and we were mixed; our mother had violated the rules by mingling with a GI, an American soldier, the biological father we did not know. Nor did our African American neighbors fully accept us; they had reservations because we weren’t black either.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of New York State Is Designed As a Resource for All Education Professionals, but with Particular Consideration to Those Who Work with Bilingual1 Students
    TTHE LLANGUAGES OF NNEW YYORK SSTATE:: A CUNY-NYSIEB GUIDE FOR EDUCATORS LUISANGELYN MOLINA, GRADE 9 ALEXANDER FFUNK This guide was developed by CUNY-NYSIEB, a collaborative project of the Research Institute for the Study of Language in Urban Society (RISLUS) and the Ph.D. Program in Urban Education at the Graduate Center, The City University of New York, and funded by the New York State Education Department. The guide was written under the direction of CUNY-NYSIEB's Project Director, Nelson Flores, and the Principal Investigators of the project: Ricardo Otheguy, Ofelia García and Kate Menken. For more information about CUNY-NYSIEB, visit www.cuny-nysieb.org. Published in 2012 by CUNY-NYSIEB, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, NY, NY 10016. [email protected]. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Alexander Funk has a Bachelor of Arts in music and English from Yale University, and is a doctoral student in linguistics at the CUNY Graduate Center, where his theoretical research focuses on the semantics and syntax of a phenomenon known as ‘non-intersective modification.’ He has taught for several years in the Department of English at Hunter College and the Department of Linguistics and Communications Disorders at Queens College, and has served on the research staff for the Long-Term English Language Learner Project headed by Kate Menken, as well as on the development team for CUNY’s nascent Institute for Language Education in Transcultural Context. Prior to his graduate studies, Mr. Funk worked for nearly a decade in education: as an ESL instructor and teacher trainer in New York City, and as a gym, math and English teacher in Barcelona.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian North Americans' Leisure: a Critical Examination of the Theoretical Frameworks Used in Research and Suggestions for Future Study
    Leisure Sciences An Interdisciplinary Journal ISSN: 0149-0400 (Print) 1521-0588 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ulsc20 Asian North Americans' Leisure: A Critical Examination of the Theoretical Frameworks Used in Research and Suggestions for Future Study Kangjae Jerry Lee & Monika Stodolska To cite this article: Kangjae Jerry Lee & Monika Stodolska (2017) Asian North Americans' Leisure: A Critical Examination of the Theoretical Frameworks Used in Research and Suggestions for Future Study, Leisure Sciences, 39:6, 524-542, DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2016.1215944 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1215944 Published online: 30 Aug 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 121 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ulsc20 Download by: [Dr KangJae Jerry Lee] Date: 15 October 2017, At: 15:46 LEISURE SCIENCES ,VOL.,NO.,– http://dx.doi.org/./.. Asian North Americans’ Leisure: A Critical Examination of the Theoretical Frameworks Used in Research and Suggestions for Future Study Kangjae Jerry Leea and Monika Stodolskab aDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, University of Missouri at Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA; bDepartment of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The aim of this study was to critically examine the theoretical frame- Received November works employed in the existing research on Asian North Americans’ Accepted July leisure and to offer insights into additional theories that might beused KEYWORDS in future research on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Amerasian Experience in Korea: Representations of Black Amerasians in Korean and Korean American Narratives*
    Korea Journal, vol. 55, no. 1 (spring 2015): 7–30. © Korean National Commission for UNESCO, 2015 The Black Amerasian Experience in Korea: Representations of Black Amerasians in Korean and Korean American Narratives* Kun Jong LEE Abstract This essay discusses the literary representations of the black Amerasian experience in Korea. It first studies a late-1920s novella that featured the first black-Korean character and foreshadowed the major issues facing black Amerasians in later Korean and Korean American narratives published from the mid-1950s. By putting Korean-language nar- ratives into direct dialogue with their Anglophone counterparts, this transpacific study argues that the texts in Korean and English are complementary to each other and help piece together the diverse aspects of black Amerasian experience in Korea told from the two perspectives, Korean and Korean American. Both Korean and Korean American narratives portray black Amerasians fundamentally as the unfortunate victims of and- rocentrism, patriarchy, ethnonationalism, militarism, neo-imperialism, and racism. Yet there is a signal difference between the two literatures: whereas Korean narratives focus on black Amerasians’ discrimination and ostracization by Koreans, Korean American narratives highlight white racism in U.S. military facilities and criticize U.S. legal barriers and immigration policy against (black) Amerasians. Keywords: black Amerasians in Korea, literary representations of black Amerasians, race in literature, comparative Korean (American) literary studies, transpacific liter- ary studies * This essay was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF 2012S1A5A2A01016718). Seminar versions of the essay were presented at the Sixteenth Futures of American Studies Institute, “State(s) of American Studies,” Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA, June 20–26, 2011 and the Third International Conference on Asian British and Asian American Literatures, “War Memories,” Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, December 9–10, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9211240 “Successful minorities”: A critical reexamination of the Cuban-American case Vidal de Haymes, Maria del Rosario, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1991 Copyright ©1991 by Vidal de Haymes, Maria del Rosario.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploratory Study of Koreans in NYC
    Community Health Needs &An Resource Exploratory Study Assessment: of Koreans in NYC Community Health Needs &An Exploratory Resource Study ofAssessment: Koreans in NYC NYU School of Medicine Institute of Community Health and Research Center for the Study of Asian American Health 550 First Avenue, MSB-153 New York, NY 10016 www.med.nyu.edu/csaah © September 2007 Table of Contents Acknowledgements . v Background . 1 Who are the Koreans in NYC? . 3 Health Status, Information, and Health Seeking Behaviors . 9 Access to Healthcare . .11 Health Conditions . 13 Literature Gaps and Recommendations . 19 References . 21 Appendix . 23 iii iv Acknowledgements Written by Jennifer Ahn and Noilyn Abesamis-Mendoza Photography credits: Henrietta Ho-Asjoe, Douglas Nam Le, Jennifer Ahn, and Christian Ngo Designed by The Ant Men Creative, LLC CSAAH COMMUNITY OUTREach TEAM • Noilyn Abesamis-Mendoza, MPH • Douglas Nam Le • Henrietta Ho-Asjoe, MPS FUNDING SUPPORT This publication was made possible by Grant Number P60 MD000538 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities and its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCMHD. COMMUNITY SUPPORT The Center for the Study of Asian American Health is also grateful to the following individuals and organizations that offered invaluable advice, insight, information, and assistance for this project: David Aguilar, David Hong, Dongchan v Acknowledgements Kim, Seong Gyu Kim, Seongho Kim, Jinny Park, Khanh Phan, Rhodora Ursua, Anthony Wong and volunteers from the Korean American Voters’ Council and the Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] or 212-263-3072.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebration of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Heritage Month
    Celebration of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Heritage Month Annotated Book Bibliography Theme: History, Trends and Anti-Violence against AAPI Prepared by Drs. Xue-Ming Bao and Alan Delozier Seton Hall University Libraries May 2021 Adams, Maurianne. 2000. Readings for Diversity and Social Justice. New York; Routledge. This work covers the scope of oppressions in America. It contains a mix of short personal and theoretical essays and should be designed as an introduction to the topics at hand. Altschiller, Donald. 1999. Hate Crimes: A Reference Handbook. 1 online resource (xi, 204 pages). vols. Contemporary World Issues. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. This book offers a historical look at the targets of hate crimes in America, offers a chronology of some crimes committed against them, and includes a look at individuals who are combating violent extremist activities. Arar Han and John Hsu. 2004. Asian American X: An Intersection of Twenty-First Century Asian American Voices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. The essays highlight the vast cultural diversity within the category of Asian American, yet ultimately reveal how these young people are truly American in their ideals and dreams. Asian American X is more than a book on identity; it is required reading both for young Asian Americans who seek to understand themselves and their social group, and for all who are interested in keeping abreast of the changing American social terrain. Clara C. Park. 2007. Asian American Education: Acculturation, Literacy Development, and Learning. Research on the Education of Asian and Pacific Americans. Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing. This series explores and explains the lived experiences of Asian and Americans as they acculturate to American schools, develop literacy, and claim their place in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian American and Pacific Islander Veterans Fact Sheet
    Asian American and Pacific Islander Veterans Fact Sheet Department of Veterans Affairs- Center for Minority Veterans version 11/08/2013 Asian American and Pacific Islander Military and Veteran History Asian American and Pacific Islanders have been serving honorably in the United States Military, since the War of 1812. The First Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) to reach general officer rank was Brigadier General. Albert Lyman, who was Chinese and Hawaiian American, was the commanding general of the 32nd Army Division that fought in the Leyte campaigns in the Philippines in World War II. The highest ranked AAPI in the military was Eric Shinseki, who was a four – star general and the Army Chief of Staff. Medal of Honor The first Congressional Medal of Honor recipient was to US Army Private Jose Nisperos, from the Philippine Scouts Unit for this action on September 24, 1911. The one and only Medal of Honor awarded during peacetime on January 21, 1915 was to Second Class Telesforo Trinidad. Twenty-one of the twenty-four Medal of Honor recipients during WWII were Japanese-Americans serving with the 442nd Regimental Combat Team or the 100th Infantry Battalion. They are Barney Hajiro, Mikio Hasemoto, Joe Hayashi, Shizuya Hayashi, Daniel Inouye, Yeiki Kobashigawa, Robert Kuroda, Kaoru Moto, Sadao Munemori, Kiyoshi Muranaga, Masato Nakae, Shinyei Nakamine, William Nakamura, Joe Nishimoto, Allan Ohata, James Okubo, Yukio Okutsu, Frank Ono, Kazuo Otani, George Sakato, and Ted Tanouye. Also in WWII, Captain Francis Wai is the only Chinese American to receive the Medal of Honor. In the Korean War, the first Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, Private First Class Anthony T.
    [Show full text]