DOCSLIB.ORG

A MAPPING STUDY of MEDIA CONCENTRATION and OWNERSHIP in TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES David Ward

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A MAPPING STUDY OF MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP IN TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES David Ward with Oliver Carsten Fueg and Alessandro D’Armo © Commissariaat voor de Media and David Ward 2004 Colophon Contact David Ward [email protected] [email protected] ©Netherlands Media Authority and David Ward 2004 Commissariaat voor de Media Hoge Naarderweg 78 1217 AH Hilversum Postbus 1426, 1200 BK Hilversum The Netherlands Websites: www.cvdm.nl www.mediamonitor.nl MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP IN TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES CONTENTS Preface 3 1 Introduction and executive summary 5 2 Comparative overview 7 2.0 Introduction 7 2.1 Media concentration 7 2.1.1 The newspaper sector 7 2.1.2 The broadcasting sector 10 2.1.3 Summary 14 2.2 Regulatory instruments 23 3Belgium 25 3.0 Introduction 25 3.1 Media concentration 25 9 Spain 139 3.1.1 The newspaper sector 25 9.0 Introduction 139 3.1.2 The broadcasting sector 28 9.1 Media concentration 139 3.1.3 Cross media ownership 39 9.1.1 The newspaper sector 139 3.2 Summary of ownership rules 41 9.1.2 The broadcasting sector 144 9.1.3 Cross media ownership 157 4 France 43 9.2 Summary of ownership rules 160 4.0 Introduction 43 4.1 Media concentration 43 10 Sweden 163 4.1.1 The newspaper sector 43 10.0 Introduction 163 4.1.2 The broadcasting sector 48 10.1 Media concentration 163 4.1.3 Cross media ownership 58 10.1.1 The newspaper sector 163 4.2 Summary of media ownership rules 63 10.1.2 The broadcasting sector 165 10.1.3 Cross media ownership 171 5 Germany 67 10.2 Summary of ownership rules 174 5.0 Introduction 67 5.1 Media concentration 67 11 Switzerland 177 5.1.1 The newspaper sector 67 11.0 Introduction 177 5.1.2 The broadcasting sector 72 11.1 Media concentration 177 5.1.3 Cross media ownership 80 11.1.1 The newspaper sector 177 5.2 Summary of ownership rules 90 11.1.2 The broadcasting sector 180 11.1.3 Cross media ownership 192 6 Italy 93 11.2 Summary of ownership rules 194 6.0 Introduction 93 6.1 Media concentration 93 12 United Kingdom 197 6.1.1 The daily newspaper sector 93 12.0 Introduction 197 6.1.2 The broadcasting sector 98 12.1 Media concentration 197 6.1.3 Cross media ownership 104 12.1.1 The newspaper sector 197 6.2 Summary of ownership rules 107 12.1.2 The broadcasting sector 197 12.1.3 Cross media ownership 197 7 Luxembourg 111 12.2 Summary of ownership rules 197 7.0 Introduction 111 7.1 Media concentration 111 Select bibliography 219 7.1.1 The newspaper sector 111 7.1.2 The broadcasting sector 113 Comparative charts 223 7.1.3 Cross media ownership 119 Belgium 229 7.2 Summary of ownership rules 122 France 233 Germany 235 8 The Netherlands 125 Italy 237 8.0 Introduction 125 Luxembourg 239 8.1 Media concentration 125 The Netherlands 242 8.1.1 The newspaper sector 125 Spain 244 8.1.2 The broadcasting sector 128 Sweden 247 8.1.3 Cross media ownership 133 Switzerland 249 8.2 Summary of ownership rules 136 United Kingdom 253 MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP IN TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 1 I would like to thank the following people for their support and comments: Constanze Barz Alfons Birrer Markus Booms Inge Brakman Maja Cappello Eva Harrie Sofia Johansson Quint Kik Evelyne Lentzen Emmanuelle Machet Bernd Malzanini Angeles Martín Lennart van der Meulen Tatiana Repkova Peter Schierbeck Maurice Vergeer Carole Winistoerfer Runar Woldt 2 MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP IN TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES PREFACE The growth of media companies and trends towards concentration raise serious issues as to their impact on the independence and diversity of media products in the Netherlands. At the request of the Dutch government the Commissariaat voor de Media (Dutch Media Authority) has developed a moni- tor to identify and describe these trends. Through the Mediamonitor, a project that provides both an annual report and website, the Commissariaat analyses the effects of media concentration on the supply of content including news and information. Since 2001 two reports have been published on media concentration in the Netherlands as part of the Mediamonitor. These reports contain an inventory of sectors that are of importance in the democratic life of the public in that they supply news and information. In this respect the reports cover both the print industry (newspapers and magazines) and television and radio. The Commissariaat has also commissioned studies on the cable sector and the Internet in the Netherlands from external research institutions. The third Mediamonitor report is due in September 2004. In the reports we assess the levels of concentration in the media sector against the previous year. They provide a background introduction covering trends and developments in the Dutch media sector and an assessment of levels of concentration of the suppliers of news and information. More specifi- cally we look at the number of companies operating in the broadcasting and publishing markets and their market shares. We also assess programming and editorial concentration in the context of the overall number of programmes and titles available in any one market. Finally, the reports assess the diversity of the media markets in the Netherlands. This analysis includes national and regional media allowing in-depth analysis of the media markets in the Netherlands. The results from the Mediamonitor are employed to assess future developments and policies and it is presented to the State Secretary for Media and Culture. International companies own a large number of media companies in Europe and the Netherlands is no exception to this rule. Although these companies are part of an international strategic plan, in prac- tice they must also meet with the regulatory requirements of nation states. Across Europe there is a wide range of instruments employed by national authorities that include both rules that work to pre- vent dominant positions forming in media markets as well as proactive instruments to support diversi- ty and pluralism across the region. To obtain a clearer sense of media concentration in the Netherlands the Commissariaat voor de Media has commissioned this report, which is an international comparative analysis of the media mar- kets in a number of European countries. The countries have been selected either for their geographi- cal size or because of the similarity of their media sectors to the situation in the Netherlands. The countries covered are: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden and the UK. The media researcher David Ward has provided the study. We hope that this international comparative study marks a new step in understanding the phenome- non of media concentration in a period when "who owns which voice" becomes increasingly impor- tant. Transparency and openness is key to a plural media sector that supports the democratic process in Europe and it is only through increased awareness that we are in a position to better judge future media developments and safeguard the high quality and independence of the information the public receive through the media sector. Hilversum. May 2004 Commissariaat voor de Media prof. dr. Jan van Cuilenburg, Chairman mr. Inge Brakman, Commissioner MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP IN TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 3 4 MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP IN TEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 One of the mainstays of media regulation throughout Europe has been concerned with maintaining a plurality of outlets and operators throughout the media industry. To this end certain limits and thresh- olds have traditionally been employed by governments to ensure that each market, and the sector overall, consist of a diverse number of operators so that that the public have access to a broad range of services. The recognition that media markets should remain open and plural to enable fair competi- tion and the perceived importance of the media in the democratic and social life of the public have converged to provide legal frameworks across Europe. These ensure that excessive market concen- tration does not threaten the possibility of competitive and plural media markets. This report was commissioned by the Commissariaat voor de Media and the consultant was request- ed to map out the market share and ownership structures of the media in ten European countries to cover the national and regional press, radio and television sectors. The objective of the report is to provide an overview of the state of play on the degree of media concentration in these countries and to develop certain benchmarks on a comparative level. To this end it has provided data on market shares and an analysis of the range of operators in these markets in the following media sectors: • The national press • The regional press • Radio broadcasting • Television broadcasting A series of national reports provide the background for the comparative part of the study. Although the national reports are set out to account for the differences in the individual national and regional mar- kets, and the various characteristics of these markets, the report has sought to employ a degree of harmonisation in order to provide a consistent framework for comparative purposes. The main findings of the report are the following: • A wide range of regulatory instruments is employed in the countries to ensure that media mar- kets remain plural. At the same time, competition policy is becoming an increasingly central mechanism for assessing whether a merger or acquisition involving a media company will have a detrimental effect on the sector. The instruments employed by the ten countries in the broad- casting sector range from ceilings for market share that any one broadcaster is allowed (and traditionally in Italy financial ceilings) and diversity in terms of shareholders (France) to less media-specific rules that are built on the idea of maintaining fair competition in markets.
Recommended publications
  • Broadband Services and Local Loop Unbundling in the Netherlands Nico Van Eijk, Institute for Information Law

    Broadband Services and Local Loop Unbundling in the Netherlands Nico Van Eijk, Institute for Information Law

    Broadband Services and Local Loop Unbundling in the Netherlands Nico van Eijk, Institute for Information Law This article describes the availability of broadband services in the ABSTRACT Netherlands. This particularly concerns broadband services for the consumer/end user such as access to the Internet. We will first discuss the new telecommunications act before dealing with current market relations and regulation of the (until 15 December 2000). This means telecommunications sector. This is followed by a description of the most significant deci- that — in accordance with the Euro- sions of the independent supervisory body, the Independent Post and Telecommunications pean directives — KPN has special obli- Authority, as related to broadband services. gations concerning interconnection and other forms of special access to its net- work. KPN is also responsible for pro- viding universal service (primarily he Netherlands has always been keen to take the traditional voice telephony service). On the expiration of the T lead in liberalizing the telecommunications sector. statutorily prescribed period of two years, whether KPN is still Nevertheless, it was not until the end of 1998 that Dutch leg- in the same position will again need to be established. It is islation satisfied all the underlying principles of European implicitly assumed that the operators of broadcasting networks telecommunications regulations. (the legal term for cable television networks) have significant This does not diminish the fact that, in the previous peri- market power regarding the transmission of programming. od, important liberalizations had occurred. In 1996–1997 all The market position of KPN is thus also at issue in regard to restrictions to offering telecommunications services — with the question of whether local differences in rates for public voice the exception of voice telephony — were discontinued.
  • Etudes Supérieures Education Primaire Et Secondaire Langues

    Etudes Supérieures Education Primaire Et Secondaire Langues

    CURRICULUM VITAE Rafael MATOS-WASEM Né le 3 janvier 1961 (55 ans) Haute Ecole de Gestion & Tourisme Caracas, Venezuela HES-SO Valais-Wallis Allemand, suisse (SH) et vénézuélien Route de la Plaine 2 En couple, 4 enfants 3960 Sierre Tél. privé + 41-27-455 59 61 Tél. prof. + 41-27-606 90 90 Tél. privé + 41-21-781 29 02 [email protected] [email protected] ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rafael_Matos-Wasem LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rafael-matos-wasem-1a42554 Etudes supérieures 2001 Docteur en sciences économiques et sociales, mention géographie. Université de Genève. Titre : “ Territorialité, modernisation et flux de capitaux dans l’agriculture de Tenerife (îles Canaries), 1800-1914 ”, sous la direction des Prof. Ramón PÉREZ GONZÁLEZ (La Laguna) et Claude RAFFESTIN (Genève). Thèse No 518 soutenue le 1er octobre 2001. 1988-1989 Université de Genève, SES, histoire économique (demi-licence). 1985-1988 Université de Genève, Faculté des sciences économiques et sociales (SES). Septembre 1988 : obtention de la Licence en géographie. Mémoire : “ Sous-développement et économie mondiale : le cas du café au Costa Rica, 1820-1950 ”. 1985-1988 Institut Universitaire d'Etudes du Développement (IUED), Genève. Obtention du Certificat en études du développement (1987) et du Diplôme en études du développement (M.A.) (1988). Bourse de la République et Canton de Genève (1987-1988). 1982-1985 Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. Janvier 1985 : obtention du Bachillerato en geografía (B.A.), summa cum laude.
  • Octobre 2003 JOURNAL DES AUDITEURS ET TÉLÉSPECTATEURS ROMANDS DE L’AUDIOVISUEL DE SERVICE PUBLIC

    Octobre 2003 JOURNAL DES AUDITEURS ET TÉLÉSPECTATEURS ROMANDS DE L’AUDIOVISUEL DE SERVICE PUBLIC

    MÉDIATIC MeP n°85 19.09.03 10:22 Page 1 Berne, Fribourg, Genève, Jura, Neuchâtel, Valais, Vaud membres de SSR idée suisse ROMANDE Édito Elections fédérales : la RSR et la TSR unissent leurs forces. Depuis le 1er septembre la RSR et la TSR couvrent ensemble les élections fédérales. Leur objectif ? « Créer le débat au sein de la population» et pour cela, «permettre au citoyen d’aller à la rencontre des candidat(e)s », « donner la parole aux représentants des partis, confronter les idées ». Pour y arriver les deux médias ont mis en œuvre tous les moyens à leur disposition : Médiascope - une série d’émissions spéciales à des heures de grande écoute (Face aux partis du 1er au 13 septembre à 20h05 sur TSR1, du 15 septembre au 3 octobre à 7h45 sur RSR La d Conseil des programmes Première) ; E RSR-TSR “Je t'aime, Moi non plus” - des émissions décentralisées dans l’ensemble des cantons romands (Les Aiguillages électoraux du 8 au 26 septembre à 18h30 sur RSR La Première et Les Débats des Etats du 22 septembre au 6 octobre à 20h30 sur TSR2) ; Infos-régions - deux grands débats pré-électoraux (Le grand débat final le 6 octobre à l’en- 1) Nouveau membre (SRT-BE) seigne de Forums sur RSR La Première et Le Grand débat soirée en direct et Prix SRT Vaud (SRT-VD) en public de deux heures trente avec les candidats de tous les partis sur TSR1) ; 1! Gulliver (SRT-NE) - l’interactivité avec les auditeurs-téléspectateurs sur le web avec www.tsr.ch 1@ La Schubertiade à Martigny (SRT-VS) - la création d’un Centre Romand des Médias dans les studios de la TSR d’où les équipes de la RSR et de la TSR rendront compte, le 19 octobre de midi à minuit, de l’évolution du scrutin.
  • Spaces and Identities in Border Regions

    Spaces and Identities in Border Regions

    Christian Wille, Rachel Reckinger, Sonja Kmec, Markus Hesse (eds.) Spaces and Identities in Border Regions Culture and Social Practice Christian Wille, Rachel Reckinger, Sonja Kmec, Markus Hesse (eds.) Spaces and Identities in Border Regions Politics – Media – Subjects Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Natio- nalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de © 2015 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or uti- lized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover layout: Kordula Röckenhaus, Bielefeld Cover illustration: misterQM / photocase.de English translation: Matthias Müller, müller translations (in collaboration with Jigme Balasidis) Typeset by Mark-Sebastian Schneider, Bielefeld Printed in Germany Print-ISBN 978-3-8376-2650-6 PDF-ISBN 978-3-8394-2650-0 Content 1. Exploring Constructions of Space and Identity in Border Regions (Christian Wille and Rachel Reckinger) | 9 2. Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Borders, Spaces and Identities | 15 2.1 Establishing, Crossing and Expanding Borders (Martin Doll and Johanna M. Gelberg) | 15 2.2 Spaces: Approaches and Perspectives of Investigation (Christian Wille and Markus Hesse) | 25 2.3 Processes of (Self)Identification(Sonja Kmec and Rachel Reckinger) | 36 2.4 Methodology and Situative Interdisciplinarity (Christian Wille) | 44 2.5 References | 63 3. Space and Identity Constructions Through Institutional Practices | 73 3.1 Policies and Normalizations | 73 3.2 On the Construction of Spaces of Im-/Morality.
  • Media Ownership Chart

    Media Ownership Chart

    In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly . In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world's largest media corporation. In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly , shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth. Who Controls the Media? Parent General Electric Time Warner The Walt Viacom News Company Disney Co. Corporation $100.5 billion $26.8 billion $18.9 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues $23 billion 1998 revenues $13 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues Background GE/NBC's ranks No.
  • January–September 2019 Results

    January–September 2019 Results

    JANUARY–SEPTEMBER 2019 RESULTS 30 September 2019 Atresmedia's consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), taking into account all mandatory accounting principles and rules and measurement bases, as well as the alternative treatments permitted by the legislation in this regard. In addition, information is disclosed on the individual performance of the Group’s two main lines of business: Audiovisual and Radio. 1 1. HIGHLIGHTS ....................................................................... 3 1.1 Milestones and key figures .............................................. 3 1.2 The economic climate and the market .............................. 4 2. ATRESMEDIA ....................................................................... 6 2.1 Consolidated Income Statement ...................................... 6 2.1.1 Net revenue ......................................................... 7 2.1.2 Operating expenses ............................................... 7 2.1.3 Operating earnings and margins ............................. 8 2.1.4 Profit before tax .................................................... 9 2.1.5 Consolidated profit for the period ............................ 9 2.2 Consolidated Balance Sheet .......................................... 10 2.3 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement ................................ 12 2.4 Share price ................................................................. 13 2.4.1 Atresmedia's shares ...........................................
  • Bibliographie Courante De La Littérature Luxembourgeoise 2010

    Bibliographie Courante De La Littérature Luxembourgeoise 2010

    GRAND-DUCHÉ DE LUXEMBOURG MINISTÈRE DE LA CULTURE Daphné BOEHLES Bibliographie courante de la littérature luxembourgeoise BIBLIOGRAPHIE LITTÉRAIRE 2010 2010 (23e année) et compléments des années précédentes 2011 CENTRE NATIONAL DE LITTÉRATURE CENTRE NATIONAL DE LITTÉRATURE BIBLIOGRAPHIE LITTÉRAIRE 2010 Bibliographie courante de la littérature luxembourgeoise 2010 1 Impressum: Editeur: Centre national de littérature 2, rue E. Servais L-7565 Mersch 2011 Tirage: 600 exemplaires Imprimerie: Hengen ISSN 1016-328X 2 MINISTÈRE DE LA CULTURE Daphné BOEHLES Bibliographie courante de la littérature luxembourgeoise 2010 (23e année) et compléments des années précédentes CENTRE NATIONAL DE LITTÉRATURE MERSCH 2011 3 Sommaire Avant-propos p. 7 Photographies et abréviations p. 8 1 Linguistique et politique linguistique p. 9 2 Anthologies, bibliographies et ouvrages de référence p. 26 3 Histoire et critique p. 32 3-1 Essais et articles généraux p. 32 3-2 Auteurs luxembourgeois p. 45 3-3 Auteurs étrangers p. 59 4 Littérature d’expression luxembourgeoise p. 140 4-1 Livres p. 140 4-2 Contributions p. 143 4-3 Critiques p. 152 5 Littérature d’expression française p. 160 5-1 Livres p. 160 5-2 Contributions p. 169 5-3 Critiques p. 183 6 Littérature d’expression allemande p. 192 6-1 Livres p. 192 6-2 Contributions p. 203 6-3 Critiques p. 226 7 Littérature d’expression diverse p. 242 7-1 Livres p. 242 7-2 Contributions p. 253 7-3 Critiques p. 260 8 Traductions p. 268 8-1 Traductions par des auteurs luxembourgeois p. 268 8-2 Traductions d’auteurs luxembourgeois p. 268 9 Cabaret et théâtre p.
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Waarde commerciële radiovergunningen Poort, J.P.; Kerste, M.; Prins, J.; Scavenius, E.; van den Ende, B.; Trommelen, P.; van Eijk, N.; Rutten, P. Publication date 2010 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Poort, J. P., Kerste, M., Prins, J., Scavenius, E., van den Ende, B., Trommelen, P., van Eijk, N., & Rutten, P. (2010). Waarde commerciële radiovergunningen. (SEO-rapport; No. 2010- 06). SEO [etc.]. http://www.seo.nl/uploads/media/2010- 06_Waarde_commerciele_radiovergunningen.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 Waarde commerciële radiovergunningen Amsterdam, 28 april 2010 In opdracht van ministerie van Economische Zaken Waarde commerciële radiovergunningen SEO Economisch Onderzoek: Joost Poort Marco Kerste Jurriaan Prins Eske Scavenius m.m.v.
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020

    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020

    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
  • Docuwatch Digitales Fernsehen

    Docuwatch Digitales Fernsehen

    DocuWatch Digitales Fernsehen Im Auftrag der Landesmedienanstalten 2/99 1. AUSTRALIEN: ÜBERGANG ZU DIGITALER VERBREITUNG UND FELDVERSUCHE 2 2. JAPAN: WEIßBUCH “COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN” U.A. 4 3. FRANKREICH: STUDIE UND WEIßBUCH ZUM TERRESTRISCHEN DIGITALEN FERNSEHEN 6 4. EINZELTHEMEN 8 4.1. Großbritannien: ITC und OFTEL zum Bundling 8 4.2. Großbritannien: ITC zum Vorschlag einer Gebührenerhöhung bei digitalem Empfang 8 4.3. Großbritannien: Reaktionen auf das britische Konvergenz-Grünbuch 9 4.4. Großbritannien: ITC Guidelines für Gebärdensprache im DTV 9 4.5. Singapur übernimmt DVB-Standard 9 4.6. USA: V-Chip Implementation verläuft planmäßig 9 4.7. USA: Department of Commerce zu E-Business 9 4.8. Communications Regulatory Policy Unit der DG XIII: Multimedia Regulation 10 4.9. LfK: Bericht über Erprobungsprojekt Mediendienste 10 5. LITERATURHINWEISE 11 5.1. Zeitschriften 11 5.2. Buchveröffentlichungen 13 6. ANHÄNGE 15 6.1. Anzahl der Abonnenten von Programmpaketen /1993-1998 16 6.2. Digitale Satelliten-Programmpakete / Februar 1999 17 Zum DocuWatch Um die Entwicklung digitalen Fernsehens begleiten zu können, benötigen Entscheidungsträger bei den Regulierungsinstanzen ebenso wie alle anderen Beobachter kontinuierlich Informationen. Das Hans- Bredow-Institut sichtet im Auftrag der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Landesmedienanstalten (ALM) Dokumente aus dem wissenschaftlichen Bereich sowie von Regulierungsinstanzen, in- und ausländischen sowie supra- nationalen Organisationen und Verbänden und erstellt Zusammenfassungen, die auf die für die Arbeit der Landesmedienanstalten relevanten Fragen focussiert sind. Im Mittelpunkt stehen dabei neben inländischen Institutionen solche aus den USA, Kanada, Großbritannien und Frankreich. Daneben wird die am Institut gesammelte wissenschaftliche Literatur ausgewertet. Arbeitsgruppe digitales Fernsehen am Hans-Bredow-Institut Uwe Hasebrink, Friedrich Krotz, Wolfgang Schulz sowie Fernando Reimann Redaktionsschluß 31.
  • Accès Aux Médias Audiovisuels Plateformes & Enjeux

    Accès Aux Médias Audiovisuels Plateformes & Enjeux

    L’accès aux médias audiovisuels Plateformes & enjeux Sommaire 01 PAYSAGE p.7 02 RÉGLEMENTATION p.25 03 CONSOMMATION p.37 04 ENJEUX ÉCONOMIQUES p.51 05 PROTECTION DU CONSOMMATEUR ET DU PUBLIC p.65 06 L’ACCÈS À L’OFFRE p.73 07 ÉVOLUTION DU CADRE RÉGULATOIRE p.89 éditorial Au sens du décret sur les services de médias audiovisuels (SMA), un distributeur de services est une personne qui met à disposition du public un ou des services de médias audiovisuels. Ces services sont généralement édités par d’autres personnes que le distribu- teur, mais ces deux fonctions se confondent de plus en plus, bous- culant la chaîne de valeur traditionnelle. Le distributeur de services joue un rôle fondamental dans l’accès du public à l’offre de SMA. Le distributeur est aussi un vecteur in- contournable pour un nombre croissant d’éditeurs. En pratique, la Dominique Vosters distribution de SMA constitue autant un enjeu démocratique et Président du Conseil supérieur culturel qu’un enjeu économique. Ceci justifie pleinement la régu- de l’audiovisuel lation de ce secteur dans un cadre fixé par les législateurs belges et européen. Après avoir dressé un panorama des différents types de distri- bution disponibles en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, le présent Il y a bien longtemps que le public francophone belge s’est habi- ouvrage examinera les divers modes de consommation des SMA tué à recourir à un intermédiaire pour accéder à un SMA. Sans re- qui y sont identifiés, particulièrement ceux qui recourent à de nou- monter à la radio par câble développée à Bruxelles, c’est dans les veaux moyens de distribution.
  • Pocketbook for You, in Any Print Style: Including Updated and Filtered Data, However You Want It

    Pocketbook for You, in Any Print Style: Including Updated and Filtered Data, However You Want It

    Hello Since 1994, Media UK - www.mediauk.com - has contained a full media directory. We now contain media news from over 50 sources, RAJAR and playlist information, the industry's widest selection of radio jobs, and much more - and it's all free. From our directory, we're proud to be able to produce a new edition of the Radio Pocket Book. We've based this on the Radio Authority version that was available when we launched 17 years ago. We hope you find it useful. Enjoy this return of an old favourite: and set mediauk.com on your browser favourites list. James Cridland Managing Director Media UK First published in Great Britain in September 2011 Copyright © 1994-2011 Not At All Bad Ltd. All Rights Reserved. mediauk.com/terms This edition produced October 18, 2011 Set in Book Antiqua Printed on dead trees Published by Not At All Bad Ltd (t/a Media UK) Registered in England, No 6312072 Registered Office (not for correspondence): 96a Curtain Road, London EC2A 3AA 020 7100 1811 [email protected] @mediauk www.mediauk.com Foreword In 1975, when I was 13, I wrote to the IBA to ask for a copy of their latest publication grandly titled Transmitting stations: a Pocket Guide. The year before I had listened with excitement to the launch of our local commercial station, Liverpool's Radio City, and wanted to find out what other stations I might be able to pick up. In those days the Guide covered TV as well as radio, which could only manage to fill two pages – but then there were only 19 “ILR” stations.