<<

Gale Primary Sources Start at the source.

‘The Immortal Periodical’: in the Nineteenth Century

Patrick Leary

Founder of the VICTORIA forum for Victorian Studies, author of The Punch Brotherhood

Various source media, Punch Historical Archive 1841-1992

EMPOWER™ RESEARCH Introduction come and gone. The most successful of these, the In the long and lively history of publishing, there has penny weekly Figaro in , had folded a couple of never been anything quite like Punch. With its eclectic years before, and nothing since had caught the public mix of jokes, puns, parodies, and social and fancy. Not that there was any shortage of available political commentary, the threepenny weekly quickly talent. Scores of young artists and writers haunted insinuated itself into the texture and rhythm of British Fleet Street, most of them living hand to mouth, middle-class life. Punch was not yet three years old contributing to this or that paper or pamphlet or when one writer hailed its 'permanent existence and theatre as the opportunity arose, meeting one another extensive success', and in 1858 a writer in the Atlantic in taverns between commissions, and keeping a lookout Monthly called it 'an institution and power of the age, no for paid work. [1] more to be overlooked among the forces of the nineteenth century than is the steam-engine or the magnetic telegraph'. Having acquired the Punch habit in Beginnings the 1840s, the British reading public clung to that habit It was in this bibulous and convivial, yet intensely for generations. So much a part of the cultural competitive atmosphere, in the dense warren of streets landscape had Punch become that forty years later adjoining the Strand, that Punch was born. Innovative John Ruskin called it, simply, 'the immortal periodical', engraver Ebenezer Landells, determined to succeed while American dramatist Brander Matthews declared, where Figaro in London had failed, enlisted the aid of 'Punch is not a mere comic weekly; it is a British printer Joseph Last as well as that of a man who would institution as solidly established as The London Times prove to be one of the most remarkable and versatile or the Bank of or the Established Church or literary journalists who has ever lived: . the Crown itself. ...It has been accepted as an integral Mayhew, for his part, at once consulted his friend Mark and essential part of the British constitution'. To , who was then writing short pieces for the stage explore the back files of Punchis to listen in on a unique while presiding over the Shakespeare's Head tavern in kind of national conversation taking place week after Wych Street. With Lemon's help, a preliminary staff week for over 150 years, a conversation shaped equally was assembled that included writers Douglas Jerrold, by events and by the changing contingent of editors, Gilbert Abbot à Beckett, Stirling Coyne, W. H. Wills and writers, artists, engravers and proprietors whose tastes artist Archibald Henning. At a series of meetings in and abilities went to make up each weekly issue. Landell's house and in such taverns as the "Edinburgh Castle" in the Strand and the "Crown Inn" in Vinegar

Yard, the name "Punch" was settled upon, a prospectus Yet in London in the of 1841, the prospects for was drawn up, and the financial details were worked a new comic magazine looked very uncertain. The idea out. Unable to find a publisher willing to serve as of a cheap comic paper built around wood-engravings, proprietor-the traditional model for starting a and modelled on popular Parisian papers, had been periodical-the original projectors decided to share the circulating all through the 1830s, and lots of them had costs and profits among them. Mayhew, Lemon and

Coyne were to share the editorial responsibilities in New proprietors: Bradbury & Evans exchange for a one-third share of the enterprise; Bradbury & Evans would have seemed a natural choice Landells, with another third, was to engrave all the as permanent replacement for Joseph Last as printers, woodcuts; and Last, also a third-part proprietor, would and ultimately as co-proprietors as well. No other print the magazine at his premises in Crane Court. In printing business in London had so deliberately and effect, therefore, the magazine was to dispense with a successfully combined two elements that would be single proprietor and instead be a collective effort in necessary for a successful comic journal, elements that which all would share. had long been assumed to be incompatible: extensive woodblock and high volume, high speed

production. This was crucial. In addition to their long In the weeks before Punch made its debut the experience at printing illustrated serials such as projectors spent lavishly on advertising, including Paxton's Magazine of Botany, they had also been 100,000 copies of the prospectus and 6,000 handbills. associated with the Comic Annual. Perhaps most On July 17, 1841, the first issue appeared, and over the importantly, they had been the printers for Chapman following weeks Punch began to make its way toward a and Hall's innovative and highly successful experiments modest degree of public recognition, but at a high and with 's illustrated monthly serials, growing cost. The initial flurry of interest quickly beginning with the spectacular sales of Pickwick receded and, as month followed month, sales sagged. Papers in 1836-37 and continuing with Nicholas By September, with debts mounting, Joseph Last, the Nickleby (1838-39). By December of 1841 they had just printer, wanted out of the enterprise altogether. completed the demanding task of printing a weekly Landells acquired Last's share, giving him ownership of serial (Master Humphrey's Clock) identical in price and two-thirds of the magazine. That autumn, Mayhew and format to what Punch would require-a sixteen-page, his friend H. P. Grattan (at that time imprisoned for threepenny weekly, lavishly supplied with woodcuts- debt), plunged into the work of creating and in considerably greater quantities. The new a Punch Almanack. Coming out just in time for the printers, combined with the success of the Almanack, Christmas season, it proved a runaway success, selling made it possible to cut back on the pages of some 90,000 copies in one week. By the end of the year, advertisements to make room for more, and better, through an agreement guaranteeing the Punch printing woodcut . account to the firm in exchange for a loan of £150, the firm of William Bradbury and Frederick Evans became Punch's exclusive printers, a fact first But neither the Almanack's success nor Punch's announced in the January, 1842 number that began change in printers served to address two problems that Volume Two. had afflicted the magazine from the outset: a lack of capital and a lack of effective distribution. As the

financial situation worsened-a situation signalled by the scarcity of expensive full-page cartoons in the second

half of 1842-Landells sought, without success, to political partisanship, open obscenity, salacious persuade other contributors, such as artist H. G. Hine, scandal and gross personal attacks on well-known to purchase shares in the paper. The older Punch men individuals; such papers as Barnard Gregory's The retained a vivid memory from this period of Gilbert à Satirist, Charles Malloy Westmacott's The Age, and Beckett leaning out of the window of the editorial office Renton Nicholson's The Town were particularly and roaring to passersby, "We must have cash!" This notorious, and also associated with blackmail. In the same downward spiral had spelled the early demise of eyes of the early Victorians, Punch's great many periodicals of the time: a circulation too small to accomplishment was to offer wholesome comicalities, cover costs, leading to a debt burden that placed leavened with satirical commentary, that could safely speculative expansion of the print run, with the hope of be read and passed around within the family circle of achieving a sustaining level of circulation, further and even the most fastidious household. Indeed, in sharp further out of reach. At some point in the first months contrast to the scandal sheets, much of that humour of 1842, Lemon and Douglas Jerrold again sought out was itself drawn from a domestic setting, featuring Bradbury and Evans, this time to offer to sell them the wives, husbands, children and servants; even the editors' one-third share in Punch. Ebenezer Landells, political cartoons frequently represented public figures without whom Punch would never have begun, violently as children, at school or on the street or in the nursery. opposed any such transfer, and threatened legal action. One of the earliest reviews of the magazine, in The After a protracted series of negotiations that stretched Times, noted approvingly 'the total exclusion from its from April to December of that year, Landells sold the pages of all that is gross, low, or coarsely personal', remaining shares to the firm for £350, a figure and such approval was a constant refrain in representing little more than the magazine's debts. testimonials to the magazine over the years. Much of Landells himself, who originally retained the business this tasteful restraint would come to be attributed to of engraving all of Punch's woodcuts, was soon the careful oversight of , who as co- squeezed out altogether, and Bradbury and Evans, with founder and co-editor (with Henry Mayhew) and then their extraordinary resources, assumed complete sole editor from 1845 until his death in 1870, was control. renowned for keeping a strict eye upon the contents.

Hitting Its Stride Equally characteristic was the magazine's intensive Within two or three years, the magazine had arrived at pursuit of up-to-the-minute topicality. The Punch staff a winning formula that it would retain, through various ransacked classical mythology, current novels and refinements, well into the twentieth century. As scholar poems, talked-about paintings, popular catch-phrases, Richard Altick has observed, Punch succeeded at first advertising, folk customs, gossip, fashions and the not because of what it was, but because of what it was periodical's own back issues for comic parallels to not. Throughout the 1820s and 1830s, London's satirical people and events in the news. John Leech's funny papers had an unsavoury reputation for extreme captioned illustrations, drawn from the myriad of

'types' inhabiting the passing London scene, proved conversational lives of the Victorian middle classes. The wildly popular. Douglas Jerrold, the best-known writer magazine's organising conceit, which accorded the on the early staff, brought a keen intelligence and biting traditional figure of 'Mister Punch' -from the perennial wit to relentless radical critiques of such figures as the '' shows-the role of Punch's conductor, hard-hearted Poor Law commissioner, the game- author and representative, proved a stroke of genius, preserving landowner, and the tyrannical sweatshop drawing upon many readers' nostalgia and affection for manager. The writers for Punch introduced for the first a popular folk icon that was still delighting children and time into satirical magazines the comic series, a vastly adults alike in London's streets. So powerful has that popular and widely imitated feature of the magazine. conceit remained that many readers ever since have Douglas Jerrold's 'Mrs. Caudle's Curtain Lectures' continued to think and write of the magazine as having (January to November, 1845), which portrayed a meek been the creation of an ageless 'Mister Punch', a habit husband enduring his wife's nightly criticism, and W. M. encouraged by the long-held custom of anonymous Thackeray's 'Snobs of England' (February 1846 to authorship in the British periodical press. Much of that February 1847), which introduced the word 'snob' to the anonymity was transparent to contemporary readers, language, were such runaway hits that their portrayals however- Jerrold's authorship of 'Caudle', for instance, became as much a part of the mid-Victorian mental was an open secret-and we can now understand a great universe as the popular characters of Dickens's novels. more about the material we encounter in our This phenomenon, in which an artist's or writer's explorations of the magazine owing to the splendid creation would, through the sheer vividness of its recent efforts that have opened up Punch's own records comedy, come to colonise the imaginations of countless for study, and thereby unveiled the details of each readers, happened again and again over the writer's contributions [3]. decades. Punch's full-page political , or 'Large

Cut' [2] (as it was known within the magazine), drawn most often by Leech in the early years and later by John The shift to single proprietorship at the end of 1842 Tenniel, likewise refashioned political iconography for marked the turning-point in the young magazine's an age grown wary of the sexual and scatological prospects and in the evolution of an internal culture in grossness of an earlier tradition of political caricature. which the weekly dinner meeting assumed even greater Time and again, a Large Cut so vividly captured an importance. The new owners did two things that event (the Indian Mutiny, the Second Reform Bill, the profoundly changed the nature of the meeting: limiting fall of Paris, the retirement of Bismarck) that the image it to staff members alone, and moving it to their has remained indelibly associated with that event business premises. Familiar with the idea of retaining forever after. Often keyed to a topic raised by a Times specially skilled workers in their printing works, editorial or article for that week, Punch's Large Cut Bradbury and Evans fully supported the notion of a intensified, extended and shared in a complex reflective small staff of contributors, retained on a weekly salary, and enabling relationship between the nation's most in preference to relying largely on outside powerful and influential newspaper and the contributions. The weekly meeting, like the staff itself,

became an exclusive affair, a catered dinner attended habit of showing his Punch proofs to all and sundry at by invitation only and hosted by the proprietors the Cheshire Cheese pub. Other contributors were themselves in their premises in Bouverie Street, where dismissed or left to work at other papers or projects the Punch staff gathered around an oval deal table that during this period, including artists H. G. Hine, would soon become legendary as "The Punch Table," in Archibald Henning, Kenny Meadows and writer W. H. which contributors carved their initials. Attendance Wills. became both a privilege and a responsibility, one that over time and with the growth of Punch to the status of a national institution enormously increased the staff's A more significant loss was Henry Mayhew-the sense of itself as a select group with a shared mission- originator, with Landells, of the whole enterprise- in short, a literary brotherhood. Before long the whose passion and inventiveness had played such a key meeting was moved from Saturdays (publishing day) to role in keeping the magazine lively in its first few years. Wednesday evenings, and its purpose narrowed to a As co-editor with Lemon, Mayhew's strength lay in discussion settling the subject, form and legend for the coming up with ideas for others to execute, particularly Large Cut, the full-page that had for the innumerable small woodcuts that went to make become the magazine's most influential weekly feature. up each number. Mayhew himself described his role at Punch some years later as that of 'suggesting or

pointing out to the Contributors and Artists the subjects The Founding Generation for treatment in the next week's number'. The record of The staff itself was streamlined over the next few years, the Large Cut suggestions that survives from this as well. Stirling Coyne was one of the first to go; having period appears to back up this claim. Essentially a proved of little use either as co-editor or as contributor, monologist, Mayhew, as one observer recalled, 'would he was summarily discharged when Lemon found that talk like a book on any subject for hours together...[and] he had plagiarised a contribution from a Dublin paper. sit up till any hour as long as anyone would stay and Another early casualty was Albert Smith, a friend of listen to him'. As Mayhew did not himself do much in John Leech (and, like him, a former medical student) the way of writing for the magazine-from this time who had contributed such popular series as 'The forward, members of the staff who excelled at being Physiology of Evening Parties' during Punch's first two 'suggestors' also contributed a substantial portion of years and was generally regarded outside the magazine writing-his suggestive flow of talk may also have as an up-and-coming young writer. Smith had an seemed to the proprietors dearly bought at an editor's outgoing, informal manner that many people found salary of £200 a year. Mayhew's later career would appealing but that struck others as bumptious and include the pioneering survey, London Labour and the vulgar. Jerrold, who could not abide Smith, made him London Poor, in which he memorably chronicled the the constant butt of derogatory jokes, but it may have forgotten working poor of London in books that been his attachment to the magazine's freewheeling historians consult to this day. early days that roused Lemon's ire: specifically, Smith's

With Mayhew's departure in April of 1846, Mark Lemon hundred columns of prose and verse per half-yearly remained as sole editor, overseeing a staff whose volume. A barrister who later became a Poor Law contributions would enliven Punch for many years to Commissioner and police magistrate, à Beckett come. At the centre of that staff was artist John Leech, brought his legal experience to bear in The Comic whose work had quickly come to define the look and Blackstone as well as in recounting the adventures of tone of the magazine. For many readers, Leech 'Mr Briefless', a hapless barrister who became one was Punch, his cartoons its chief glory; the magazine of Punch's most popular recurring characters. A mild- was simply inconceivable without him. Handsome, mannered and rather shy man, he took an active part in fastidious, highly-strung and hard-working, he boasted the Large Cut discussions but otherwise left most of a comic gift for gentle ridicule of passing fads, fashions the talk to others. and foibles that was unmatched by any other artist of his time. Victorian readers adored Leech's drawings, and particularly the perennially wide-eyed "Leech girl," Horace Mayhew, Henry's younger brother, acted as with an intensity that is difficult either to exaggerate or Lemon's sub-editor for a time, but for some reason this to recapture, while his Punch comrades felt an caused 'rows' and Lemon took over those duties affectionate respect for him that would be undimmed himself, while Horace-nicknamed 'Ponny'-stayed on by his growing irritability in later years. From his the staff as a miscellaneous contributor. After his satirical drawings of the crinoline craze to his funny brother's departure, Horace Mayhew was Jerrold's depictions of portly Mr. Briggs, the hapless sportsman, main political ally in Punch's early 'radical' support for Leech reflected back to his readers a host of instantly improvement in the lot of workingmen. recognisable details of London middle-class life that endeared him to them for the rest of their lives. The Another early, and staunch, contributor was Percival precocious artist Richard Doyle, not yet out of his teens Leigh. Nicknamed 'the Professor' because of his when he came to work for Punch at the end of 1843, learning and his solemn, donnish manner, Leigh had shared the main illustrative duties with Leech. become friends with Leech and Albert Smith when all three were young medical students at St

Gilbert Abbott à Beckett, a thirty-year-old barrister, Bartholomew's Hospital, and had collaborated with had been one of the first writers asked by Lemon and Leech on several comic pieces before they both became Mayhew to join the fledgling magazine; they were early recruits to the staff . A dab hand at versifying, and mindful of his long experience as editor and writer with particularly at the mock-classical verses that were a a succession of lively comic papers, the most staple feature of the 1840s Punch, Leigh had his successful having been Figaro in London in the early greatest success with the brightly satirical parody of 1830s. After a brief absence during 1842, 'Gil' à Beckett Samuel Pepys's diary accompanying artist Richard returned to Punch and became by far the most reliably Doyle's delightful cartoons of 'Ye Manners and Customs prolific contributor, turning out as many as one of Ye English in 1849'. Perhaps the least well- known of

the Punch circle, in his own time and since, Leigh name of the poor at a time of widespread economic nevertheless proved a steady if unspectacular distress, were primarily a creation of Jerrold and contributor to the magazine for decades and a valued Lemon. The latter insisted on publishing Thomas authority and storyteller at the Table, on which he was Hood's Song of the Shirt, a heart-wrenching protest the first of the staff to carve his initials. against the exploitation of needlewomen, in December of 1843, creating a sensation throughout the country.

Although he was the most powerful figure was called to the Punch Table after Henry on Punch after its editor, Jerrold faced some stiff Mayhew left, having served two years of apprenticeship opposition. John Leech, to whose drawings the paper as an outside contributor. A distinguished academic (he owed much of its popularity, was a vocal Tory who had held a Cambridge fellowship) Taylor was a versatile openly despised working people; many of his Large writer whose work for Punch was one of several Cuts of the 1840s, with subjects and treatment careers that included those of barrister, civil servant, suggested by Jerrold, must therefore have been drawn Times art critic, professor of English Literature and under fierce protest. Other staffers, including Albert successful playwright. Briskly earnest and rather Smith and à Beckett, felt that Punch should stick to irascible, nominally a Liberal in politics but with a deep jokes and forswear serious commentary on politics or suspicion of any further widening of the suffrage, Taylor current affairs. brought to the talk of the Table and to Punch's pages a certain intellectual seriousness and the sense of responsibility of a government insider. He would end But the strongest voice in opposition to Jerrold was the his days as editor of the magazine (1874-1880). magazine's second most popular writer, William Makepeace Thackeray, the Cambridge-educated scion

of a well-to-do Anglo-Indian family who had lost his The most influential and powerful voice at the Table, fortune and turned to writing out of necessity in the and in the magazine, during these years belonged 1830s, and who joined the staff after Smith's departure. to Douglas Jerrold. Just as John Leech established the Though sympathetic to radical politics in his youth, distinctive visual character and tone of Punch's more Thackeray's instinctive conservatism surfaced as he harmless comicalities, Jerrold supplied its satirical grew older and more successful, and combined with his edge and political seriousness. Renowned for his verbal competitive nature to make him a natural antagonist to quickness and caustic wit, he was accounted by all who what he considered Jerrold's undignified rabble- knew him a formidable antagonist in conversation, and rousing and irreverent sneering at authority. specimens of his wittily contemptuous insults directed Ultimately, a changing political climate after the at friends and foes alike circulated widely during his collapse of Chartism in 1848-49, the growing influence lifetime and for years after his death. The 'radical' of Thackeray and his allies at Punch, and the lure of politics of the early years of Punch, which mainly other projects such as the editorship of Lloyd's Weekly, consisted of attacks on the rich and powerful in the attenuated the influence of Jerrold's style of overtly

radical politics at the magazine. Already by the end of contact with members of the Punch circle, who prided 1846, in writing to his old friend, Charles Dickens, themselves on their association with such a widely Jerrold complained of what he saw as Punch's new acclaimed writer. want of seriousness, its willingness to make a joke of anything: 'I am convinced', he wrote, 'that the world will get tired (at least I hope so) of this eternal guffaw at all The most important result of Thackeray's defection was things. After all life has something serious in it. It his replacement: , whom historian cannot be all a comic history of humanity'. By the mid would later call 'perhaps the most 1850s, although he still wrote somewhat regularly brilliant and useful all-round man who ever wrote for Punch and attended the dinners, the focus of his for Punch'. A veteran journalist who had done both attentions had moved elsewhere. travel and Parliamentary reporting for the Morning Chronicle during the heyday of its influence in the

1840s, Brooks had moved into comic writing as a The 1850s marked other sea-changes at the magazine. mainstay of The Man in the Moon, a monthly begun by In 1850, Doyle resigned his position in protest against ex-staffer Albert Smith in explicit competition the magazine's fierce 'no-Popery' campaign of personal with Punch. Lemon so admired Brooks's clever, good- invective against Cardinal John Wiseman and Pope Pius natured abuse at Punch's expense that he was soon IX, waged by Lemon, Jerrold and Leech - in opposition recruited as a contributor, and in 1852 joined the staff. to Thackeray and Leigh - in reaction to the attempt to Brooks's conservative politics, outstanding abilities and reinstate the Roman Catholic hierarchy in England. aggressive conversational style would in time make a Charles Keene, one of the finest draughtsmen of the significant change in the oral culture of Victorian period, began his long career the Punch Table, an arena that he would come to with Punch shortly thereafter, although he did not join dominate almost as completely as Jerrold had done the Table until 1860. A long anticipated blow was the years before. Many of the most famous Large Cuts that loss of Thackeray. Already restive at Punch because of appeared at this period originated from Shirley his clashes with Jerrold, Thackeray had enjoyed Brooks's suggestions, while his series, Essence of enormous success and worldwide fame with Vanity Parliament, pioneered an astringently witty approach to Fair. Continued success with Pendennis left Thackeray Parliamentary politics that proved vastly popular for feeling constrained by the demands and low status of many years. Much of the shift to a more conservative anonymous comic journalism and dissatisfied with its political tone that historians have noted in the Punch of relatively meagre rate of pay. He had, he felt, the 1850s and 1860s can be traced to Brooks's growing outgrown Punch; as he later told Evans, 'I fancied influence. myself too big to pull in the boat; and it wasn't in the nature of things that Lemon and Jerrold should like me'. Thackeray continued to drop by the weekly dinners Brooks joined another newcomer, , a from time to time, however, and so remained in close classically-trained painter and book illustrator who had

been brought in at Jerrold's suggestion the year before encouragement of Bradbury and Evans, would to fill the gap left by the resignation of Richard Doyle. guide Punch for generations to come. Best known today for his illustrations to in

Wonderland, Tenniel soon took over from Leech the execution of the Large Cut, and entirely made it his own Triumphs and Transitions with a gift for memorable iconic representations (John Punch was never without rivals, and some of its most Bull, the British Lion, Britannia, the Fenian menace) active ones emerged in the 1860s: Judy, Tomahawk, and portraits of public figures (Disraeli, Bismarck), that and, especially, Fun. The rivalry sharpened the has never been surpassed. magazine's satire, and even added to its contributors: just as Man in the Moon had supplied Shirley Brooks, so

Fun yielded Francis Burnand, who joined Punch in 1863. The last of the changes of the mid-1850s were the most A Cambridge man of immense energy, Burnand proved profound: the sudden deaths, within a year of each a master of burlesque and an inveterate punster. (He other, of old comrades Gilbert à Beckett and Douglas would live to become editor of the magazine from 1880 Jerrold. À Beckett, on holiday with his family in to 1906.) The death of John Leech in 1864, at the early Boulogne, was carried off by diphtheria on August 30, age of 47, precipitated a crisis, with some readers and 1856, at the age of 45. Jerrold wrote a tender obituary even some members of the staff concerned that the in Punch commemorating his colleague's fifteen years magazine could not be carried on without him. In the of service to the magazine and his 'genial, manly spirit', wake of that loss, George Du Maurier was brought in as a tribute that would furnish the inscription on à an illustrator, later joining Charles Keene in doing the Beckett's tombstone in Highgate cemetery. Less than a 'social cuts' for which Leech had been famous. Du year later, on the 8th of June, 1857, Jerrold himself Maurier's elegantly attired men and women took died, the oldest member of the staff at 54. On his Leech's comedy of manners to a more refined, but no deathbed he gave Horace Mayhew a message to deliver less ridiculous, social level; later, his pointed satires of to his friends at the PunchTable: 'Tell the dear boys that the aesthetes of the 1880s fixed an indelible image of if I've ever wounded any of them, I've always loved their affectations in the mind of many readers. Along them'. (A quietly productive but unexciting writer, Henry with John Tenniel, whose mastery of the art of the Silver, would be brought in to fill Jerrold's place. political cartoon would be fully established in the public Although his own work was of little note, the diary mind by such memorable cuts as 'The British Lion's Silver kept of the talk at the Punch Table has proven a Vengeance on the Bengal Tiger' (1857) and 'A Leap in rich source of information about the magazine.) The the Dark' (1867), Burnand and Du Maurier, the rising deaths of à Beckett and Jerrold left Mark Lemon, John stars of the 1860s, would largely come to define the Leech and Horace Mayhew as the only survivors at the tone and look of Punch in the remaining decades of the Table of Punch's founding generation. Yet the system nineteenth century. they had helped to create, with the shrewd support and

The proprietorship of the magazine also shifted with the meetings were quieter, more orderly and perhaps more times, while retaining strong ties to the past. In 1865 productive. The pen-portraits of Henry Lucy, who took William Bradbury and Frederick Evans retired in favour over the Parliamentary beat that had been Brooks's of their sons. From that time forward, the well- specialty, were admirably illustrated by artist Harry established firm of art dealers, Thomas Agnew and Furniss, whose work had been rejected by Taylor but Sons of Manchester, played a larger and larger role, whom Burnand was quick to welcome to the magazine the younger Bradbury having married Thomas's in 1880. Over his fourteen years of work for Punch, daughter, Laura. In 1872 the younger Evans was forced Furniss's drawings of politicians, including the elderly out, and William Hardwick Bradbury assumed W. E. Gladstone, became enormously popular. Other management of Bradbury, Agnew & Co., with contributors like F. Anstey, author of Vice Versa, added assistance from his able brother-in-law, William to the sprightliness that Burnand strove to revive. That Agnew. The latter's Liberal opinions and more undoubted comic masterpiece of late Victorian sophisticated understanding of the current art scene literature, Diary of a Nobody, by George and Weedon both had an impact on discussions around Grossmith, appeared as a serial in the magazine in the Punch Table, and left their mark on the magazine. 1888-89, and has never been out of print since. If the In 1890 the firm became a limited company, with nineteenth century was the golden age of Punch, the William Agnew, already an M.P. and soon to be a twentieth century brought astonishing new talents and baronet, as its chairman. energies to the magazine, ranging from P. G. Wodehouse to Ronald Searle, and from A. A. Milne to

Sir John Betjeman. To even begin to do justice to the The long service of so many members of the staff life of the magazine in the modern era would require at of Punch made for considerable continuity. Shirley least one more essay like this one. Brooks had acted as Mark Lemon's right hand for so long that at Lemon's death in 1870, the transition to Brooks's editorship was seamless. Among the Conclusion achievements of that editorship was Brooks's The letterpress of the magazine is a delightful and encouragement of artist Linley Sambourne, who drew instructive resource whose enormous riches have the decorative initials for the Essence of Parliament always been comparatively neglected in favour of the series. Sambourne would work on the magazine for the illustrations; today, at last, both text and image are next forty years. When Brooks died suddenly in 1874, thoroughly explorable. To browse or search through the Tom Taylor succeeded him; not a man of lively fancy, nineteenth century volumes of Punch, as we can now so Taylor relied on the effusions of Burnand and Du readily do, is to be constantly called outward from its Maurier and others to carry the magazine forward. pages in a thousand directions, plunged into the dense Under Burnand's quarter-century as editor, many of and often puzzling detail of everyday middle-class the more rambunctious traces of the old magazine's cultural and political life in Victorian England as roots in tavern life were at last left behind; the staff reflected in the distorting comic imaginations

of Punch's writers and artists. From dustmen to bishops to policemen, from impertinent servant-girls to parliamentary windbags to simianised Irish radicals, Punch takes us to scenes of that life - the streets, the racetrack, the parlour, the schoolroom, the seaside - to witness a constantly shifting parade of distinctive figures interacting with one another. So, too, did the interaction of contributors and readers shape both the magazine and the ways in which its readers viewed and pondered the world around them.

Notes

[1] For further information about Punch's competitors and comic art in the nineteenth century, see Brian Maidment, "Pencillings, Cuts and Cartoons: Punch and Early Victorian Comic Illustration", available elsewhere on this site.

[2] This is also referred to as the Big Cut by a number of scholars and academics

[3] The Punch office kept editorial ledgers that recorded who contributed to each issue. The author data from these ledgers is included in the Punch Historical Archive, allowing users to see for the first time who contributed specific pieces to the magazine.

CITATION

Leary, Patrick: “’The Immortal Periodical’: Punch in the Nineteenth Century.” Punch Historical Archive 1841-1992: Cengage Learning 2014

© Cengage Learning 2014

@GaleEMEA