Living on the Edge Living on the Edge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Living on the Edge Living on the Edge 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge Living on the edge K . B . V E I O P O U THE quest for peace in the Northeast of India has not been more illusive than the attempt to arrive at a final settlement with the Nagas. That the Naga problem has been a thorn in the flesh for the Government of India (GoI) is a well established fact. Touted as the mother of all insurgencies in the region, the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) has been a tough nut to crack. And so, when the Framework Agreement (FA) was signed in August 2015 between the GoI and NSCN, many saw it as the culmination of the ceasefire agreement brokered in 1997. There was a sense of anticipation from many corners because it gave some hope of finally resolving one of South Asia’s longest armed conflicts. Broad smiles on the faces of Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India, and Thuingaleng Muivah, the leader of NSCN, flashed across newspapers and prime time TV channels. Termed as a ‘historic peace accord’ the GoI press release hoped that the deal ‘will end the oldest insurgency in the country’.1 Furthermore, it informed that the ‘details and execution plan will be released shortly.’ But somehow, what was supposed to be a short wait has turned out to be rather a long one! Even as the FA completes five years this month, the wait continues, and people are running out of patience. And rightly so. The last dateline to arrive on something concrete was 31 October 2019, which has now become a thing of the past. Quickly, the anticipation has turned to apprehension for various reasons. For seven decades now, the Nagas have been waiting for a solution as if it would come the very next day. The first generation passed on ‘waiting’. Will this generation also pass on ‘waiting’? The uncertainty is deadening. While the wait continues one cannot help but see an uncanny resemblance of the Naga situation with that of the two tramps in Samuel Beckett’s famous two-act play, Waiting for Godot (1952). In the play, two tramps wait for somebody called Godot whom they have never met nor are they sure of why they are waiting for him. At the end of each act, a boy comes to announce that Mr. Godot will not come that day but will definitely come the next day. Just like the two tramps, the Nagas have also been ‘waiting’. Another sunrise, another full moon, another season, another year. Will Nagas’ Mr. Godot ever come? Once in a while there will be a teaser to keep the game going. And, like in the play, the interlocutor, like the boy character, appears to announce that the deal has been delayed for some reasons. Thus, the wait continues. Setting a dateline to solve the Naga problem may seem pragmatic on the face of it, but to close a chapter on one of the most resilient movements in recent times is not going to be easy. The crucial question is, will the FA be really a final deal or will it turn out to be just another agreement that has failed to live through time? Several accords have https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 1/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge been signed over the long history of the struggle, starting with the 9- Point Agreement of 1947 that was signed between Sir Akbar Hydari as the Agent of the Government of Indian Union and the Naga National Council (NNC) which, ultimately, did not make a substantial impact. Then the 16-Point Agreement of 1960 was signed between the GoI and the Naga people, represented at the time by the Naga People’s Convention, which successfully created the state of Nagaland within the Union of India. But it failed to quell the movement. In fact, it only heightened the underground movement led by the nationalists who wanted full sovereignty. Then came the Shillong Accord of 1975 signed between the GoI and a section of the NNC. But the absence of many prominent names, including that of A.Z. Phizo, led to the allegation that the accord was signed by the arrested leaders under duress. Considered as the father of Naga nationalism, A.Z. Phizo was in London at that time trying to garner international support for the Naga struggle. His physical absence and the conspicuous silence on condemning the accord led to the formation of NSCN in 1978 led by Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and S. Khaplang, taking the reins from the NNC. A decade later, however, a misunderstanding between the leaders led to the split of NSCN into NSCN (I-M) led by Isak and Muivah and NSCN (K) led by Khaplang. The reasons for the split will forever be buried in the jungles of Burma (Myanmar), far away from the knowledge of the common people. What began as a struggle for the lofty idea of freedom soon metamorphosed into a story of factional killings that has resulted in wounding everyone and benefiting none. This continues to be the story lately. Appeals for reconciliation led by civil organizations like the Forum for Naga Reconciliation (FNR) and Naga Mothers Association (NMA) have largely been unheeded by the underground groups. As of date, there are several breakaway groups making matters worse and the chance of forming a united front even bleaker. In the last few years, particularly after the signing of the FA, efforts have been made on arriving at a solution to the protracted Naga problem. But the whole process has been halted because the Naga underground groups have refused to come under one banner, and certainly R.N. Ravi, the current interlocutor cum Governor of Nagaland, seems to have no clue how to handle this. We have seen the swift formation of the Naga National People’s Groups (NNPG), a conglomeration of six underground groups mainly operating in the state of Nagaland. But the NSCN (IM) has proudly stood aloof arguing that it is the torchbearer to the cause of the Nagas, owing to their wider pan- Naga following. Though there have been mild threats from the GoI that she is going ahead to seal the deal with NNPG even if the NSCN (IM) is not on board, all stakeholders knew that this was mere lip service because a deal without the NSCN (IM) would amount to no deal at all. With all the hype around FA, the fact is that there is hardly any progress made on the ground. And a lot has to do with the uncertainty of the content of the agreement which was never revealed. So far, it has been https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 2/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge left to the media and curious analysts to do the guesswork. The secrecy of the FA’s content has left many to wonder if it was a hurriedly signed document for the sake of ailing leader Isak Chisi Swu, who passed away soon after. And now, with the other leader, Th Muivah, aging fast, will something be arrived at before he too passes on? That is one big worry. The NSCN (IM) certainly cannot afford to go the way of NSCN(K) that has more or less fizzled out soon after the leader S. Khaplang passed away sometime back. Without a doubt, the Nagas are living on the edge! As this struggle prolongs, what has become clear is that there has been a paradigm shift in the notion of ‘freedom’. From the grand idea of an independent Naga nation it has now slowly simmered down to pleading for mere recognition of their ‘unique history’ and identity. Every time terms like sovereignty, greater Nagalim, alternative arrangement, autonomy, among others, are brought to the negotiation table, undesirable consequences erupt from neighbouring states and people’s groups. The reaction of the Meitei population from Manipur in 2001 is just one example. The reason for the flare-up at that time was the extension of the ceasefire ‘without territorial limits’ which didn’t go well with the Meiteis of the valley.2 Since then, the GoI has been cautious of the language. After all, she cannot afford to let multiple problems arise while trying to solve a problem, however big it may be. So, in course of time, contentious terms have been phased out from the vocabulary of the struggle. As of what we hear and read today, the deal has been stuck on the issues of separate flag and passports for the Nagas, merely a symbolic gesture. Whether it be true or not, no one can tell because both the parties are tight-lipped about it. But as of how the present government functions today, it is very likely that even the symbolic may not be granted considering the fact that the same has been taken away from the Kashmiris when Article 370 was revoked in August 2019. So, what is the way ahead for both India and the Nagas? The last seven decades have been a tumultuous ride for the two entities. India certainly realized that solving the Naga problem is crucial for peace and stability in the Northeast region. For a region that is home to a host of insurgency groups and sub-national movements, it is important to recognize that the military mindset has done more damage than good in winning the confidence of the people. Even today, the region continues to be heavily militarized.
Recommended publications
  • On the Naga Issue
    18.08.2020 Tuesday Talking tough: On the Naga issue Context: The National Socialist Council of Nagaland- Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM) has for the first time released the details of the 2015 framework agreement. What is the origin of Naga Issue and the timeline of the events? The assertion of Naga Nationalism began during Colonial period and continued in Independent India. Below is the pictorial representation of the timeline. What are the key demands of the Naga groups? 1. Greater Nagalim (sovereign statehood) i.e redrawing of boundaries to bring all Naga-inhabited areas in the Northeast under one administrative umbrella. 2. It includes various parts of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Assam and Myanmar as well. 3. Naga Yezabo (Naga Constitution) 4. Naga national flag. What was the Ceasefire Agreement which was signed in 2015? Interlocutor R.N. Ravi signed the agreement on behalf of the Centre in presence of PM Modi. The other two signatories were leader of NSCN(IM) i.e. Isak Chishi Swu, who died in 2016 and Thuingaleng Muivah (86) who is leading the talks. The Government of India recognised the unique history, culture and position of the Nagas and their sentiments and aspirations. The NSCN(IM) also appreciated the Indian political system and governance. 1 18.08.2020 Tuesday Significance: It shows the governments strong intent to resolve the long standing issue and adoption of diplomatic peaceful approach by Naga Society to fulfil their aspirations. Objective: Both sides agreed that October 2019 for concluding an accord, which would settle all Naga issues. The details of the agreement have not been made public by the government citing security reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Afspa and Insurgency in Nagaland
    © 2019 JETIR April 2019, Volume 6, Issue 4 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) AFSPA AND INSURGENCY IN NAGALAND B ZUBENTHUNG EZUNG DR. TARIQ AHMED Department Of History, Department Of History Lovely Professional University, Lovely Professional University Phagwara -Punjab Phagwara- Punjab. ABSTRACT This research is made to understand how the Naga National Movement started, to examine the peace initiatives between the Government of India and the Naga leaders and also to analyze how affective the Naga National Movement has been. Here in this research we also try to understand the impacts of the Naga National Movement on the society and on the Naga people. Key Words: AFSPA, Insurgency, Nagaland, Naga Movements, NNC, FGN, NSCN-IM, NSCN-K INTRODUCTION Nagaland is a small state in the North eastern part of India. The Nagas lived in the North East hilly region of India and Myanmar. During the olden days, each Naga village was an independent republic so eventually the Nagas wanted to be free from all outside domination. Every Naga villages was independent and each with their own chiefs who acted as the leader, no other tribe had an interest in ruling over different or any other tribe or village. During an external aggression from foreign invaders all the Naga Chiefs collaborated and fought against the invaders. Nagas have been fighting to British and to the India & Burma for occupying their homeland illegally. The Naga nationalism first emerged in when thousands of Nagas participated in the British War efforts and saw action as members of the British Labor Force in France. However, having been exposed to the outside world and inspired by the material advancement, exposure to other cultures, and the reshaping of the political world by major movements.
    [Show full text]
  • National Socialist Council of Nagaland)
    International Journal of Applied Social Science A CASE STUDY Volume 5 (3&4), March & April (2018) : 292-298 ISSN : 2394-1405 Received : 26.02.2018; Revised : 17.03.2018; Accepted : 24.03.2018 Extremism in Nagaland: A case study of NSCN (National Socialist Council of Nagaland) LIONG M. PHOM Department of Political Science, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar (Punjab) India ABSTRACT National Socialist Council of Nagaland is an insurgent groups working mostly in Northeast India. The important purpose and goal of NSCN was to achieve sovereign Naga State. This research paper focuses on understanding clearly about the NSCN (Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland). The paper is to analyse the most important aim and working philosophy of NSCN on achieving sovereign Naga state. It shows the importance of NSCN sharing same interest with the Naga people as to which there will be a strong sense of brotherhood among them. The NSCN do not have full support of the people of Nagaland regarding the working activities in the State of Nagaland. They do not share the same interest in each and every decision. Opinions differ sometimes. The opinion of the Naga people is very important to support the working of NSCN. This study includes the impact of NSCN on the issues of violence in Nagaland and the working and functions of NSCN to set up Sovereign, Naga State. Key Words : National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN), Sovereign, Violence, Extortion, Unity INTRODUCTION Nagaland is known as a beautiful hilly state which is one of the North East States of India. Nagaland is known for its dynamic tradition and cultural heritage which attract people from different parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Naga Peace Talks Being Delayed?
    22 September, 2021 Four years after the government inked the Naga peace accord in 2015, the Centre has now said that the process had almost concluded, despite the fact that the talks had hit a roadblock in its final stages. Why is the Naga Peace talks being delayed? It is mainly because of unrealistic demands. NSCN I-M has issued statements in the past claiming that it wanted a separate Constitution, flag and integration of all contiguous Naga-inhabited areas under Nagalim (Greater Nagaland). Government of India’s stand: A mutually agreed draft comprehensive settlement, including all the substantive issues and competencies, is ready for inking the final agreement. Respecting the Naga people’s wishes, the Government of India is determined to conclude the peace process without delay. How old is the Naga political issue? Pre- independence: 1. The British annexed Assam in 1826, and in 1881, the Naga Hills too became part of British India. The first sign of Naga resistance was seen in the formation of the Naga Club in 1918, which told the Simon Commission in 1929 “to leave us alone to determine for ourselves as in ancient times”. 2. In 1946 came the Naga National Council (NNC), which declared Nagaland an independent state on August 14, 1947. 3. The NNC resolved to establish a “sovereign Naga state” and conducted a “referendum” in 1951, in which “99 per cent” supported an “independent” Nagaland. What are the Naga peace talks? The talks seek to settle disputes that date back to colonial rule. The Nagas are not a single tribe, but an ethnic community that comprises several tribes who live in the state of Nagaland and its neighbourhood One key demand of Naga groups has been a Greater Nagalim that would cover not only the state of Nagaland but parts of neighbouring states, and even of Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourse on Geo-Body of Nagalim from Social Exclusion
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 7 Issue 01||January. 2018 || PP.48-54 Discourse on Geo-Body of Nagalim From Social Exclusion Mangoljao Maibam, M.Phil. & Ph. D. Asst. Prof., Dept. of Pol. Sc., N.G. College, Imphal, Manipur,India Corresponding Author: Mangoljao Maibam Abstract: A historic peace accord was signed between the Centre and the NSCN – IM at the residence of Prime Minister Modi, New Delhi on August 3, 2015, in the presence of P.M. Modi, Home Minister Rajnath Singh, Centre’s Interlocutor R. N. Ravi and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. This historic peace accord between Delhi and NSCN-IM is popularly known as Framework Agreement. The details of the Framework Agreement are not disclosed publicly. However, the Accord has been welcomed from many quarters especially from all Naga civil organisations. It is not the first time that NSCN-IM has claimed to have reached an agreement with the Indian Government. P.M. Narendra Modi recently says that the Naga issue should not be dragged further and it should be settled in time bound manner. And R.N. Ravi also works very seriously to settle the Naga problem in a comprehensive long term solution. In the meantime, P.B. Acharya, the Governor of Nagaland in a statement on the 29th August 2016 after meeting with his counterpart S.C. Jamir, the Governor of Odisha, says that time is ripe for final settlement of peace in Nagaland. Unfortunately, the prevailing atmospheres in Nagaland and among the Naga outfits tell otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Process in India's Northeast
    Peace Process in India’s Northeast: An Overview Giriraj Bhattacharjee∗ and M.A. Athul∗ ∗ India’s North East Region (NER) has faced a multitude of separatist and secessionist insurgencies since Independence. These insurgent groups, although up in arms against the state, did not have unified or common demands. While some were secessionist in nature [such as the Naga National Council (NNC) and United National Liberation Front (ULFA)], others such as Bodos, Kukis and Dimasas, demanded a separate state or autonomous District Councils within the Union of India. Throughout the course of conflict, neither the state nor the insurgents have been able to prevail upon each other, thereby sparking a long, attritional pattern of violence. Throughout the seven decades of insurgency in the region, neither Government forces nor major insurgent groups have been able to militarily prevail upon each other, although the Army and other Government Forces now have a permanent presence in the region. The presence of the Indian Army has been consolidated * Giriraj Bhattacharjee is a researcher at the Institute for Conflict Management. ** Athul M.A. is a researcher at the Institute for Conflict Management. Giriraj Bhattacharjee and M.A. Athul in the region with two corps formations, 3rd and 4th, based in Rangapathar (Dimapur) and Tezpur (Assam).1 Both parties have realised that they would eventually have to come to the negotiating table and conclude a mutually acceptable end state agreement. However, the pattern of attrition seeps into the negotiation process as well, resulting in a long drawn out process. This also reflects the Government’s approach (irrespective of political dispensations over time), which is primarily aligned to a conflict management mode, rather than a resolution mode that could terminate the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagaland: Elusive Reconciliations and Lingering Peace Process
    SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF PEACE AND CONFLICT 16 SEPTEMBER 2020 South Asia Conflict Monitor monthly newsletter on terrorism, violence and armed conflict… CONTENT Nagaland: Elusive Reconciliations and Lingering Peace Process Country Briefs & Nagaland: Elusive Reconciliations and News Roundup Lingering Peace Process [August 2020] NIHAR R NAYAK AFGHANISTAN: 3-5 BANGLADESH: 5-7 Despite substantial progress in the peace talks leadership, interests and between New Delhi and the armed groups of external influences. The INDIA: 7-9 Nagaland over the last five years, there are still National Socialist Council NEPAL: 09-10 uncertainties over finalising a permanent peace of Nagaland (IM) was PAKISTAN: 10-11 agreement. The second round of negotiations over formed on January 31, SRI LANKA: 12 a peace agreement with the Naga insurgent groups, 1980, by Isak Chishi Swu, including the NSCN-IM (Isak-Muivah), was Thuingaleng Muivah and initiated by New Delhi in 2015. But that appears to S. S. Khaplang. They be in trouble since October 31, 2019. A fresh wanted to establish a informal attempt by the Union Government in this 'Greater regard with the NSCN-IM in August 2020 in New Nagaland' ('Nagalim' or Delhi also has not moved in the right direction. the People's Republic of Nagaland) based on Mao While the central government has managed to Tse Tung's model. This outfit witnessed a split by address the grievances of other seven illegal Naga Khaplang faction in April 1988. In 1997, the armed groups, who are willing to sign a permanent NSCN (IM) signed a ceasefire agreement and peace agreement, the NSCN-IM, one of the largest, started a dialogue with the Union Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Initial Decade of Naga Hoho Introduction Civil Society: the Co
    XVI Annual Conference Proceedings January, 2015 Historical Evolution of Civil Society in Conflict Resolution: the Initial Decade of Naga Hoho Mrs. Banasree Phukan Assistant Professor Department of History, Pandu College Introduction The processes of conflict resolution are generally held as state driven exercises. These are mostly conducted between the state, rebels and mediators. Little consideration is given to the civil society in terms of processes of conflict resolution. Yet the civil society is usually a key actor in the contradictory processes and struggles of conflicts and dynamics of their resolution. Conflicts do not emerge in a vacuum; they are products of the structure and character of society of which the civil society is an integral part. Civil Society: The concept The term civil society is a broad concept and is hard to define. General Colin L. Powell, former U. S. Secretary of State, wrote in his “Recreating the Civil Society- One Child at a Time”: “Conceptions of what constitutes a „Civil Society‟ may differ as to details, but at a minimum, a civil society is one whose members care about each other and about the well being of the community as a whole”. Civil Society is the avenue for group freedom of expression, political organization, and general social development [Article and Web Alert: 2002]. The term civil society embraces a wide range of actors including religious leaders, women‟s organizations, NGOs, scholars and intellectuals. It includes organizations like trade unions, professional associations, chambers of commerce, ethnic associations and others. It also incorporates many other associations that exist for purposes other than advancing specific social or political agendas such as religious organizations, student groups, community development associations, the human rights associations, the press, cultural organizations, sports clubs, and other forms of organizations outside the state arena.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indigenous World-2003
    1 • • • • • • • • • • 2 • • • • • • • • 3 • • 2003 Copenhagen • • IWGIA • • • • • WORLD 2002-2003 WORLD THE INDIGENOUS THE THE INDIGENOUS WORLD 2002-2003 Compilation and editing: Diana Vinding Regional editors: The Circumpolar North & North America: Kathrin Wessendorf Mexico, Central America & the Circumcaribbean: Diana Vinding South America: Alejandro Parellada Australia and the Pacific: Diana Vinding Asia: Christian Erni and Sille Stidsen Middle East: Diana Vinding Africa: Marianne Wiben Jensen Indigenous Rights: Lola García-Alix Cover, typesetting and maps: Jorge Monrás English translation: Elaine Bolton English proofreading: Elaine Bolton & Birgit Stephenson Prepress and Print: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri, Copenhagen, Denmark ISSN 0105-4503 ISBN 87-90730-74-7 © The authors and IWGIA (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs), 2003 - All Rights Reserved. The reproduction and distribution of information contained in The Indigenous World is welcome as long as the source is cited. However, the reproduction of the whole BOOK should not occur without the consent of IWGIA. The opinions expressed in this publica- tion do not necessarily reflect those of the International Work Group. The Indigenous World is published annually in English and Spanish by IWGIA Director: Jens Dahl Deputy Director: Lola García-Alix Administrator: Karen Bundgaard Andersen This book has been produced with financial support from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. INTERNATIONAL WORK GROUP FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
    [Show full text]
  • NAGALAND and Th. Muivah's Terrorist Activities
    NAGALAND AND Th. Muivah’s terrorist Activities By W. Shapwon 1 Copy right © 2005 by: W. Shapwon Heimi All rights reserved. First edition in August 2005. Printed 3000 copies. Revised and added more terror acts of NSCN-IM from 2005 to 2010 with some photos in 2010 2 PREFACE I am constrained to write this book so as to let our people know what had gone wrong in the running history of the Naga nation. It is an undeniable historical fact that if Thuingaleng Muivah and Isak Chishi Swu, the then (1980) General Secretary of the Naga National Council and Finance Minister of the Federal Government of Nagaland had not deviated from the Naga national stand and policy, no fratricidal killing would be taken place in the history of the Naga nation. However, Th. Muivah and Isak had fallaciously portrayed that they have saved the Naga nation from doom by forming the so-called National Socialist Council of Nagaland in 1980. They also projected that the bloody partition took place among the Nagas was because of the NNC and FGN betrayed the Naga nation by signing the Shillong Accord in 1975. Believing their words, some Naga NGO leaders and some Church leaders have given their fullest support to Isak and Muivah thinking that they had taken the right step and saved Nagaland. And so, following Th. Muivah’s false allegation on the NNC and FGN they have been stating that: “The NNC/FGN signed the infamous Shillong Accord and thereby divided the Naga political movement.” “The NNC/FGN based at the Kohima Transit Peace Camp has caused needless damage to the NNC and Naga unity.” “The Shillong Accord or the NNC is the most damaging factor of the Naga Nation”, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • June 28 Page 1
    Evening daily JCILPS protest at Imphal Times Kwakeithel Regd.No. MANENG /2013/51092 Volume 4, Issue 137, Tuesday, June 28, 2016 www.imphaltimes.com Maliyapham Palcha Kumshing 3414 2/- 8th IRB NSCN-IM Chairman Isak personal Lilong police stormed: found dead Chisi Swu passes away memorandum submitted to CM th IT News foreign secretary he was later inside 7 Imphal, June 28: Isak Chisi elevated to Vice President ITNews, Swu, co-founder of the NNC. Imphal, June 28: Following MR campus National Socialist Council of The NSCN-IM leader Isak the clash between the IT News Nagaland-Isak-Muivah Chishi Swu is married to security personnel deployed Imphal, June: A 28 year old (NSCN-IM) died at the Fortis Khulu, and has five sons and at the area and villagers of police personnel of 8th Hospital in New Delhi after one daughter. Thoubal Nungei under Indian Reserve Battalion suffering from a prolong Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Lilong Police station since (IRB) was found dead illness. He was 87 years old. Muivah and S.S. Khaplang the night of June 26 today inside 7th Manipur News agency IANS reported were behind the formation of threatening to turn communal Rifles (MR) campus at that that the NSCN-IM leader, The National Socialist with residents of Nungei Khabeisoi under who is also the President of American Mission School at Council of Nagaland (NSCN) Meitei Village joining into the Haingang Police Station at the GPRN left for his heavenly Chishilimi then studied at on 31 January 1980 opposing fray following the damage around 10 am.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lotha
    Lotha The Paradox of Religious Nationalism in the Production of Naga Identity Abraham Lotha Religion and nationalism both construct an identity for their members, share common sets of collective symbols and ritual objects such as cross (a symbol for suffering), sacred sites, collective rituals (Smith 1986), create a horizontal solidarity, comradeship and imagine a communion with fellow-members even those they will never meet (Anderson 1983), and both evoke strong passions and commitment from the members. As a collective representation, “religious nationalism simply makes religion the basis for the nation’s collective identity and the source of its ultimate values and purpose on this earth” (Friedland 2001:139). Religious nationalism might occur, for instance, “when the population of a territory is religiously homogenous” (Rieffer 2003:225; Connor 1994). Examples of this are Poland, Ireland, and Nepal (as the last Hindu kingdom) nationalism. Religious nationalism can also occur when the territory inhabited by a population is given a divine sanction as a sacred site, as in Ayodhya by Hindus in India, Black Hills for Lakota, Bear Butte for Cheyenne and Sacred Mountains for Navajo, or those particularly associated with the population’s ancestral land, as in Jerusalem. Religious nationalism can also be a resistance strategy when a people’s identity is threatened by another dominant religion such as in Serbia and Kosovo. Or, religious nationalism can also arise as a form of liberation movement from the oppression of rulers who are ethnically and religiously different from the population (Rieffer 2003: 226-227). For instance, Irish nationalism was largely motivated by religious oppression and discrimination from the British (O’Brien 1988).
    [Show full text]