9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge Living on the edge

K . B . V E I O P O U

THE quest for peace in the Northeast of has not been more illusive than the attempt to arrive at a final settlement with the Nagas. That the Naga problem has been a thorn in the flesh for the Government of India (GoI) is a well established fact. Touted as the mother of all insurgencies in the region, the Nationalist Socialist Council of (NSCN) has been a tough nut to crack. And so, when the Framework Agreement (FA) was signed in August 2015 between the GoI and NSCN, many saw it as the culmination of the ceasefire agreement brokered in 1997. There was a sense of anticipation from many corners because it gave some hope of finally resolving one of South Asia’s longest armed conflicts. Broad smiles on the faces of Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India, and Thuingaleng Muivah, the leader of NSCN, flashed across newspapers and prime time TV channels.

Termed as a ‘historic peace accord’ the GoI press release hoped that the deal ‘will end the oldest insurgency in the country’.1 Furthermore, it informed that the ‘details and execution plan will be released shortly.’ But somehow, what was supposed to be a short wait has turned out to be rather a long one! Even as the FA completes five years this month, the wait continues, and people are running out of patience. And rightly so. The last dateline to arrive on something concrete was 31 October 2019, which has now become a thing of the past. Quickly, the anticipation has turned to apprehension for various reasons.

For seven decades now, the Nagas have been waiting for a solution as if it would come the very next day. The first generation passed on ‘waiting’. Will this generation also pass on ‘waiting’? The uncertainty is deadening. While the wait continues one cannot help but see an uncanny resemblance of the Naga situation with that of the two tramps in Samuel Beckett’s famous two-act play, Waiting for Godot (1952). In the play, two tramps wait for somebody called Godot whom they have never met nor are they sure of why they are waiting for him. At the end of each act, a boy comes to announce that Mr. Godot will not come that day but will definitely come the next day. Just like the two tramps, the Nagas have also been ‘waiting’. Another sunrise, another full moon, another season, another year. Will Nagas’ Mr. Godot ever come? Once in a while there will be a teaser to keep the game going. And, like in the play, the interlocutor, like the boy character, appears to announce that the deal has been delayed for some reasons. Thus, the wait continues.

Setting a dateline to solve the Naga problem may seem pragmatic on the face of it, but to close a chapter on one of the most resilient movements in recent times is not going to be easy. The crucial question is, will the FA be really a final deal or will it turn out to be just another agreement that has failed to live through time? Several accords have https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 1/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge been signed over the long history of the struggle, starting with the 9- Point Agreement of 1947 that was signed between Sir Akbar Hydari as the Agent of the Government of Indian Union and the (NNC) which, ultimately, did not make a substantial impact. Then the 16-Point Agreement of 1960 was signed between the GoI and the Naga people, represented at the time by the Naga People’s Convention, which successfully created the state of Nagaland within the Union of India. But it failed to quell the movement. In fact, it only heightened the underground movement led by the nationalists who wanted full sovereignty.

Then came the Shillong Accord of 1975 signed between the GoI and a section of the NNC. But the absence of many prominent names, including that of A.Z. Phizo, led to the allegation that the accord was signed by the arrested leaders under duress. Considered as the father of Naga nationalism, A.Z. Phizo was in London at that time trying to garner international support for the Naga struggle. His physical absence and the conspicuous silence on condemning the accord led to the formation of NSCN in 1978 led by Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and S. Khaplang, taking the reins from the NNC. A decade later, however, a misunderstanding between the leaders led to the split of NSCN into NSCN (I-M) led by Isak and Muivah and NSCN (K) led by Khaplang.

The reasons for the split will forever be buried in the jungles of Burma (Myanmar), far away from the knowledge of the common people. What began as a struggle for the lofty idea of freedom soon metamorphosed into a story of factional killings that has resulted in wounding everyone and benefiting none. This continues to be the story lately. Appeals for reconciliation led by civil organizations like the Forum for Naga Reconciliation (FNR) and Naga Mothers Association (NMA) have largely been unheeded by the underground groups. As of date, there are several breakaway groups making matters worse and the chance of forming a united front even bleaker.

In the last few years, particularly after the signing of the FA, efforts have been made on arriving at a solution to the protracted Naga problem. But the whole process has been halted because the Naga underground groups have refused to come under one banner, and certainly R.N. Ravi, the current interlocutor cum Governor of Nagaland, seems to have no clue how to handle this. We have seen the swift formation of the Naga National People’s Groups (NNPG), a conglomeration of six underground groups mainly operating in the state of Nagaland. But the NSCN (IM) has proudly stood aloof arguing that it is the torchbearer to the cause of the Nagas, owing to their wider pan- Naga following. Though there have been mild threats from the GoI that she is going ahead to seal the deal with NNPG even if the NSCN (IM) is not on board, all stakeholders knew that this was mere lip service because a deal without the NSCN (IM) would amount to no deal at all.

With all the hype around FA, the fact is that there is hardly any progress made on the ground. And a lot has to do with the uncertainty of the content of the agreement which was never revealed. So far, it has been https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 2/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge left to the media and curious analysts to do the guesswork. The secrecy of the FA’s content has left many to wonder if it was a hurriedly signed document for the sake of ailing leader Isak Chisi Swu, who passed away soon after. And now, with the other leader, Th Muivah, aging fast, will something be arrived at before he too passes on? That is one big worry. The NSCN (IM) certainly cannot afford to go the way of NSCN(K) that has more or less fizzled out soon after the leader S. Khaplang passed away sometime back. Without a doubt, the Nagas are living on the edge!

As this struggle prolongs, what has become clear is that there has been a paradigm shift in the notion of ‘freedom’. From the grand idea of an independent Naga nation it has now slowly simmered down to pleading for mere recognition of their ‘unique history’ and identity. Every time terms like sovereignty, greater Nagalim, alternative arrangement, autonomy, among others, are brought to the negotiation table, undesirable consequences erupt from neighbouring states and people’s groups. The reaction of the Meitei population from in 2001 is just one example. The reason for the flare-up at that time was the extension of the ceasefire ‘without territorial limits’ which didn’t go well with the Meiteis of the valley.2 Since then, the GoI has been cautious of the language. After all, she cannot afford to let multiple problems arise while trying to solve a problem, however big it may be. So, in course of time, contentious terms have been phased out from the vocabulary of the struggle.

As of what we hear and read today, the deal has been stuck on the issues of separate flag and passports for the Nagas, merely a symbolic gesture. Whether it be true or not, no one can tell because both the parties are tight-lipped about it. But as of how the present government functions today, it is very likely that even the symbolic may not be granted considering the fact that the same has been taken away from the Kashmiris when Article 370 was revoked in August 2019.

So, what is the way ahead for both India and the Nagas? The last seven decades have been a tumultuous ride for the two entities. India certainly realized that solving the Naga problem is crucial for peace and stability in the Northeast region. For a region that is home to a host of insurgency groups and sub-national movements, it is important to recognize that the military mindset has done more damage than good in winning the confidence of the people. Even today, the region continues to be heavily militarized. And the people’s confrontation with the armed forces has mostly been offensive and volatile. For most ordinary folks in the frontiers, the presence of soldiers does not connote safety but a sense of anxiety or fear, owing to past experience.

The very fact that the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) is still in place in many parts of the region tells of the distrust that still exists. First promulgated in 1958 to cull the rising Naga movement, the act was eventually extended to the entire region as the definition of ‘disturbed area’ continues to expand. Under the act, the armed forces are empowered to enter premises to search or arrest without warrant, and use force or fire upon even to a point of causing death merely on https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 3/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge suspicion. Worse still, they cannot be prosecuted or tried in a court of law.3 Thus, with the act in place, many atrocities committed by the Indian armed forces are made to disappear into the past. Efforts of the human rights activists fighting against the draconian law remain unheard. Even the famous marathon hunger strike (2000-2016) of Irom Sharmila for the abolition of the act could not turn the government’s attention to the ill effects of the contentious law that she had to finally give up the fast after 16 years! But for peace to be sustained in the region, revoking AFSPA is pivotal.

That said, however, the Nagas today face a gamut of paradoxes, some of which are beyond the reach of the negotiation table with India. And one of the biggest hurdles has been a lack of objective view of the problem. The Naga wiseman Niketu Iralu aptly put it this way: ‘Our mistake has been overestimating ourselves and underestimating our neighbours, and the complicated implications of the integration problem.’4 That the Nagas overestimate themselves is not an overstatement. Every honest Naga would accept this characterization. And it is this myopic view of the world around them that has cost them dearly. Even though Niketu was, at this point, talking of the complex problem of integration of Naga areas into one unit, the same is also true of the relationship with India. Seeing things from the other’s perspective always helps in arriving at a mutually respectable solution. But this has not been the problem with the Nagas alone; it has been most of the people’s problem. Naga neighbours too face this challenge, if they’re to honestly assess themselves. Good neighbours always listen to each other and bear with one another.

One other issue that needs critical attention is the divisions that the Nagas have not been able to come to terms with. The long road to freedom has hit the hurdle of finding the enemy within. The story of brothers killing brothers has been deeply woven into the movement that no amount of fighting the enemy outside could help in the reconciliation process within the family. It remains only a wishful thought that factional fighting had not become a part of the story. Lamenting on this haunting tragedy, Easterine Kire, one of the best known Naga poet and author, puts it this way in her moving poem, ‘What happened in the jungles of Burma, my brothers’:5

What happened in the jungles of Burma, my brothers? what happened to turn brother against brother forever? Something took place there in those wild impenetrables where men’s hearts turn impenetrable too something happened to my brothers and now that I am older I know that many, many things happened in the jungles of Burma not because you told me but because the things that happened the seeds that were sowed there have sprouted and are scattering their evil fruit all over our hills.

https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 4/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge A deep regret over what happened among the ‘freedom fighters’ in the jungles of Burma is expressed here in a poignant way. Whatever happened in ‘those wild impenatrables’ spilled over at the home front that haunts the present. Somehow, the GoI too saw this divide and took advantage of it. The creation of the state of Nagaland was the penultimate of this contradiction within. With statehood, India virtually washed her hand off the Naga issue. Since then, India has adopted the policy of divide and rule, though in this case it was given a milder name – the carrot and stick policy. The carrot came in the form of financial packages to those who came forward to be part of the state, and the stick went after the underground who continue to pursue full sovereignty. Again, it is Niketu Iralu who put it brilliantly: ‘Alas, we have learnt to tolerate the stick and but become pathetically addicted to the carrot! We should learn from the costly mistake.’

The question, then, remains, have the Nagas learnt from ‘the costly mistake’ of the past? The answer is an emphatic ‘no’. The cycle of ceasefires and negotiations may continue, but they will remain the games some people play. Have the Naga leaders played into the hands of some Indian bureaucrats who want a whimpering end to the Naga problem? That’s a million dollar question. But observing the way the whole dialogue for a solution has simmered down from the Prime Ministerial level to being thrust upon a junior bureaucrat in the government is hint enough of how it will ultimately end up. It looks very much scripted. Since the last ceasefire in 1997, how many hands have handled the issue? Its been tossed and turned to even those who have little clue of the history of the struggle to those who have a very negative view of the whole issue.

And so, uncertainty looms large for the Nagas at the moment. They are the two tramps of Waiting for Godot whose seriousness is comical for a larger audience watching from a distance. And just as it is a tragic moment for the tramps who did not have a clue to their predicament, the Nagas too look forward to a precarious tomorrow. Will Godot really come the next day? Or will it be just another day of meaningless wait? While the Nagas wait for their Godot, hope is swiftly diminishing.

Footnotes:

1. For details of the press release see ‘PM Witnesses the Signing of Historic Peace Accord Between Government of India and Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN)’, PIB, Government of India, PMO, 3 August 2015. https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease. aspx?relid=124221

2. For detail see https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/IN_ 010614_ExtensionCeasefireNSCN-IM.pdf

3. For details of Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), 1958, see http://legislative. gov.in/sites/default/files/A1958-28.pdf

4. Niketu Iralu, ‘Historical Rights of the Nagas and their Quest for Integration’, Appendix V, in Easterine Kire, Bitter Wormwood. Zubaan, Delhi, 2013, pp. 258-269.

5. Easterine Kire, ‘What Happened in the Jungles of Burma, My Brothers’, Biblio, May- June 2008, p. 16.

https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 5/6 9/15/2020 732 KB Veio Pou, Living on the edge

https://www.india-seminar.com/semframe.html 6/6