<<

BIOS 3010: Lecture 23: Patterns of & conservation: • Lecture summary: Male Passenger Pigeon – Patterns of diversity. – Richness relationships & gradients: • . • Spatial heterogeneity. • Climate. • Latitude, altitude & depth. • Succession. – Conservation. • Counting . • Threats, Uncertainty & Risk. • Population Viability Analysis.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 1

2. Simple patterns:

• Why do some communities contain more species than others? – Are there patterns or gradients of species richness? – If so, what are the reasons for these patterns? • “Geographical”, “Climatic”, “Independent” and “Biological” reasons. – Species richness (number of species present at a site) can be related to a resource availability axis (R) as in Fig. 21.1 that is partitioned (saturated) according to niche breadths (n) that overlap by varying amounts (o) as a measure of specialization.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 2

3. Richness relationships:

• Resource productivity: – More productive environments have more species with narrower niches but higher densities (Fig. 24.2). – But evidence also suggests that highest diversity occurs at intermediate levels of productivity in some communities (Fig. 24.6) because competitive exclusion is less likely and immigration rates are higher.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 3

1 4. Richness relationships:

• Increased spatial heterogeneity also generates more (Fig. 24.9). • Climatic variation influences species richness: – Unpredictable climatic variation is a form of and species richness may be highest at intermediate levels. – But some work shows that species richness increases as climatic variation decreases (Fig. 21.9).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 4

5. Gradients of richness:

• Latitude: – Increase in species diversity with a decrease in latitude towards the tropics (Fig. 24.13). • Perhaps because of more intense (top-down) and also reduced , as well as increased productivity (bottom-up) but with most productivity locked up in releasable by high rates after death. • Altitude: – Decrease in species richness with increased altitude (Fig. 24.17).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 5

6. Gradients of richness:

• Depth: – Generally species richness in lakes decreases with water depth. – But for benthic invertebrates richness is highest on the continental shelf at about 2000m (Fig. 24.19). • Succession: – Species richness increases with time through successional series because of a shift in (Fig. 24.20) from smaller numbers of dominant species to more species of equivalent dominance. • Then usually a decline in richness at successional maturity (Fig. 24.21).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 6

2 7. Conservation ecology

• The need for conservation: – As human population density has increased worldwide, extinctions of other species have increased for the following reasons: • by hunting and harvesting. • destruction. • Introduction of exotic pest species. • Pollution.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 7

8. The need for conservation:

• Extinctions impact “biodiversity” – Species richness: • Number of species in a geographical area. – Species diversity: • Species richness + relative species abundances, biomasses or productivities. – Scale of ecological organization: • From genes and populations through communities to landscapes and biomes. • Fig. 7.16 and Table 7.4.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 8

9. The basic conservation problem:

• Realistically, the only viable way to conserve species and is to address the issue politically through economics driving legislation: – This is a good example of Garrett Hardin’s class of “no technical solution” problems in which science can explain the problem but cannot solve it: • Solutions are implemented through legislation.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 9

3 10. The basic conservation problem:

• The problem is how to assess the economic value of species and habitats (). • We need to assess: – (1) Direct economic value through conserved resource consumption (objective). – (2) Indirect economic value, including amenity value without the need for resource consumption (objective). – (3) Ethical value of species (subjective).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 10

11. Counting species:

• How do we count the number of species alive today? • Needed to estimate rates of extinction (Table 7.4). • About 1.8 million species have been named. • Estimates of how many exist are based on: – 2 tropical species for each temperate species: • = 3-5 million species. – Rate of discovery of new species, group by group: • = 6-7 million species. – Species size:species richness relationship >0.2 mm: • = 10 million species. – Ratio of beetle:non-beetle species richness: • = 30 million tropical arthropod species: – but see Zuckerman in the 9 June 2010 issue of New Scientist at: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19019-global-biodiversity-estimate-revised-down.html – Estimates go as high as 80 million species.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 11

12. Threats to species:

• Rarity (Fig. 7.17) - categories of threat: – Vulnerable: • 10% probability of extinction within 100 years. – Endangered: • 20 % probability of extinction within 20 years or 10 generations (whichever is longer). – Critical: • 50% probability of extinction within 5 years or 2 generations.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 12

4 13. Threats to species:

• Both prevalence (proportion area covered by a species) and intensity (density) are important. • Absence can be just as important as presence for different spatial and temporal distributions. • 8 types of commonness or rarity: – (Table 25.2). • and distribution appear to be positively correlated (Fig. 25.3).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 13

14. Threats to species:

• Overexploitation: – Unsustainable harvests of resources such as great whales and large terrestrial (bison). – Collection of rare species. • Habitat disruption: – Through destruction, degradation or disturbance. • : – e.g. brown tree-snake on Guam or the nile perch in Lake Victoria (Fig. 25.4).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 14

15. Uncertainty and the risk of extinction:

• Dynamics of small populations: (Fig. 7.18). – High levels of uncertainty and high risks of extinction through: • (1) Demographic uncertainty • (2) Environmental uncertainty • (3) Spatial uncertainty (). • Local and global extinctions: – Local extinctions are common events (Fig. 7.21) and extinction is more likely in smaller populations.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 15

5 16. Uncertainty and the risk of extinction:

: – Populations fragment into metapopulations. – Then each constituent subpopulation gets smaller with higher risks of extinction (Fig. 25.9). – Fragmentation thus influences the probability of extinction of metapopulations and the way in which we design nature reserves (Figs. 25.11 & 25.12).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 16

17. Population Viability Analysis (PVA):

• What is the minimum viable (MVP) for a species population? • Answers based on: – (1) Clues from long-term studies: • e.g. Fig. 25.8b using criteria such as 95% probability of persistence for 100 years (Table 7.6) • Based on data from hunting and bird watching enthusiasts. – (2) Subjective assessment: • Discussion among experts on target species to develop PVA- based decision analysis for species such as the Sumatran rhinoceros (Fig. 7.23). – (3) Modelling persistence time: • Increases with population size and mean intrinsic rate of natural increase - if mean r is greater than its variance then persistence time increases dramatically (Fig. 7.24, 7.26).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 17

Figure 21.1:

Simple model of how species richness may vary with resource range (R), niche size (n), and niche overlap (o)

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 18

6 Figure 24.2 (3rd ed.): Niche overlap and environmental productivity.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 19

Figure 24.5 (3rd ed.): Species richness of (a) seed-eating rodents and ants (b) lizards, and (c) cladocera, against measures of productivity.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 20

Figure 24.6 (3rd ed.) : Highest richness at intermediate levels of productivity for (a) Malaysian trees, (b) fynbos plants, (c) desert rodents.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 21

7 Figure 24.9 (3rd ed.) : Increase in species richness with increased spatial heterogeneity for (a) freshwater fish in Wisconsin lakes, and (b) birds in Mediterranean climates.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 22

Figure 21.9: Decreasing species richness with increased temperature ranges in western North America.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 23

Figure 24.13 (3rd ed.) : Variation in species richness with latitude (see fig. 21.21, 4th ed.).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 24

8 Figure 24.17 (3rd ed.): Variation in species richness with altitude in Nepal (see fig. 21.22, 4th ed.).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 25

Figure 24.19 (3rd ed.): Species richness with depth of marine, bottom-dwelling animals.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 26

Figure 24.20 (3rd ed.): Rank-abundance curves of successional shifts in species richness.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 27

9 Figure 24.21 (3rd ed.): Increase in species richness during old-field successions (see Fig. 21.25, 4th ed.)

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 28

Figure 7.16: Trends in animal species extinctions since 1600.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 29

Table 7.4

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 30

10 Figure 7.17: Levels of threat.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 31

Table 25.2 (3rd ed.):

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 32

Figure 25.3 (3rd ed.): Abundance positively correlated with distribution of breeding birds in Britain.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 33

11 Figure 25.4 (3rd ed.): Effect of on forest birds of Guam.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 34

Figure 7.18: Path to extinction in small populations.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 35

Figure 7.21: Extinction rates against habitat area for (a) zooplankton in lakes, (b, c, e, f) birds on islands, (d) plants in Sweden.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 36

12 Figure 25.9 (3rd ed.):

Breeding success of birds in Michigan at different distances from a forest edge.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 37

Figure 25.11 (3rd ed.): Extinction probabilities (P) for same sized metapopulations subjected to different degrees of fragmentation (m = migration).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 38

Figure 25.12 (3rd ed.): Abundance of checkerspot butterflies in (a) a single population or (b) 3 separate populations.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 39

13 Figure 25.8 (3rd ed.): Extinction or persistence against population size for (a) island birds, and (b) bighorn sheep.

(b = Fig 7.22 in 4th ed.)

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 40

Table 7.6:

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 41

Figure 7.23: 30-year management decisions for Sumatran rhinoceros (pE = probability of extinction, EpE = expected value of pE).

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 42

14 Figure 7.24: Population persistence time against population size under demographic and environmental stochasticity.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 43

Figure 7.26: Cumulative probability of elephant extinction in 6 different habitat sizes over 1,000 years.

Dr. S. Malcolm BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 23: slide 44

15