DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecosystems: the Flux of Energy and Matter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecosystems: the Flux of Energy and Matter IEC12 09/11/2001 11:33 AM Page 197 Chapter 12 Ecosystems: the flux of energy and matter primary producers, the second trophic level contain- 12.1 Ecosystem ecology ing the primary consumers, the third trophic level con- Ecosystem ecology is the study of the interactions of taining the secondary consumers, and on to the top organisms with the transport and flow of energy and consumers in the system. The model is an oversim- matter. Ecologists who study ecosystems ask questions plification, but it serves to illustrate the flow of energy such as: What are the feeding relationships among the and matter in ecosystems (Fig. 12.1). organisms in an ecosystem? How many different types Energy flows one way in ecosystems, with energy of feeding relationships can be supported in a system? input from the sun being captured by primary pro- Why are some systems more productive than others? ducers, and large losses of energy between each trophic How much carbon and nitrogen are stored in the level, owing to respiration and inefficient energy trans- plants in an ecosystem? How rapidly do nutrients cycle fer (Fig. 12.1). through the living organisms in an ecosystem? How Because of losses to respiration, and inefficiencies in much of a particular nutrient is lost from the system harvesting, assimilation and digestion, the amount of each year? energy in any trophic level is not completely available to the next highest trophic level. This observation has been used to explain the limits to trophic levels in 12.2 The trophic–dynamic concept of ecosystems. Rarely are there more than four or five ecosystem structure trophic levels in an ecosystem, and the number of A conceptual framework developed to explain the individuals in top trophic levels is usually limited. dynamics of energy and matter flow in aquatic ecosys- Ecologists often illustrate this pattern through the use tems was developed in 1942 by Raymond Lindemann of pyramid plots, where the total amount of energy at the University of Minnesota. This model is called in each trophic level is plotted in a series of stacked the trophic–dynamic model, and it describes the rela- boxes, starting with the first trophic level on the bottom tionships between different organisms in an ecosystem (Fig. 12.2). A trophic pyramid constructed using energy by following feeding relationships among them. The is never inverted, consumers cannot use more energy organisms in an ecosystem are divided into different than is available in their food. However, pyramids con- trophic levels, with the first trophic level containing the structed with biomass can sometimes be inverted, and Fig. 12.1 A diagrammatic representation of the trophic–dynamic concept of ecosystem Respiration structure. Light energy is captured by plants and used to build their bodies. Much of this energy is lost to respiration, but a portion Light Producers Herbivores Carnivores is passed onto the next trophic level, energy represented by herbivores. A portion of the energy in herbivores is then passed on to carnivores. When individuals in any Decomposers trophic level die, they are broken down by decomposers, which recycle nutrients back into the system for uptake by other organisms. Respiration 197 .. IEC12 09/11/2001 11:33 AM Page 198 198 Chapter 12 3rd consumer ratio of the amount of plant production they ingest to 2nd consumer the total plant production. This ratio will be dependent on the plant life form. It could be as low as a few per Primary cent in northern evergreen forests, but as high as 60% in consumer African grasslands. Of the total ingested, not all will be digested. Plant material that is high in tannins, phen- olics, hemicelluloses or lignin will be harder to assimilate PRIMARY PRODUCER than tissues low in these compounds. Once assimilated, the conversion into consumer biomass will depend on the respiratory demands of the consumer. Thus, endothermic consumers spend a much greater propor- Fig. 12.2 A diagram of the amount of energy in four trophic levels tion of their assimilated energy on respiration than do of an idealized ecosystem. Each higher trophic level contains less ectothermic consumers. An endothermic animal eating energy due to losses to respiration within each level and inefficient low-quality plant food may have a net production transfer of energy between levels. efficiency of less than 1%, while an ectothermic carni- vore that eats a high-quality animal prey may have a those constructed using numbers of organisms are often value as high as 30%. invertedafor example, there are many insect herbi- vores on a single oak tree. 12.4 Nutrient cycling and decomposer trophic levels 12.3 Differences in efficiency of energy Detritus, or dead organic matter, is another major transfer among ecosystems energy pathway in most ecosystems. Breakdown of Once solar energy is used to fix atmospheric carbon detritus is a central process in the nutrient cycles of dioxide into plant material, there are differences among ecosystems. The productivity of open ocean habitats is ecosystems in its availability to higher trophic levels. often tied to the amount of decomposition and release This is because primary producers can take many dif- of nutrients by bacteria in the upper layers of the water, ferent forms, from algae to trees, and have differences before dead organisms can sink below the zone of light in the allocation of carbon to structures, which differ penetration. The turnover rate of detritus is often used in digestibility. For example, woody plants allocate as a measure of nutrient cycling, and forms the basis a significant proportion of their carbon to woody for the high productivity of some tropical communities stems. Wood is not easily digested by animals, usually found on nutrient-poor soils (Table 12.1). The turn- requiring that they have a symbiotic association with over rate will depend on the structure and chemical micro-organisms capable of digesting wood. In con- make-up of the detritus, temperature, moisture and trast, phytoplankton in aquatic systems can be largely decomposer community. Often, large arthropods are digested by zooplankton grazing on them. In addition, needed to break dead plant material (litter) apart, allow- in forest ecosystems, the age of a forest, or successional ing bacteria and fungi greater surface areas to attack stage, will affect the proportion of biomass allocated to the tissue. wood, leaves or other parts of the plants. During earlier As a rule of thumb, the pattern and rate of nutrient stages of succession, the community will have a higher movement are more important to ecosystem function number of herbaceous species, and allocation to leaf than are the absolute amounts of nutrients in the sys- material will be high. As a forest stand matures, a higher tem. Nutrient movement between plants, animals, percentage of carbon will be tied up in woody material, decomposers, detritus and soil will depend on the dif- and there is a rise in the respiration costs of supporting ferent storage pools of nutrients, and the turnover rates this tissue. of these pools. Nutrient storage pools include the living After allocation by plants, carbon and nutrients may organisms in an ecosystem, detritus and soil. Because be harvested by herbivores. The exploitation effici- decomposer activity is affected strongly by temperature ency of these herbivores will be determined by the and humidity, moist, warm areas generally have faster .. .. IEC12 09/11/2001 11:33 AM Page 199 Ecosystems 199 Table 12.1 The half-life (time taken for half the material to be broken down) and Litter production rate −2 −1 rate of production of litter for three different Community Half-life (years) (g m year ) forest communities. Tropical rainforest 0.1 1200 Temperate deciduous forest 1 800 Northern coniferous forest 7 600 turnover rates than colder, drier ecosystems. However, for the difference by observing that at every stage in the leaf structure (evergreen or deciduous), plant life form food chain, the transfer of energy is not completely (woody or herbaceous), and soil structure also influence efficient. For example, when the mice eat the grain, nutrient cycling. Leaf tissues that are high in lignin con- some of the energy contained in the wheat is dissipated tent may be hard to break down, and nutrients may not as heat (Fig. 12.2). be released from this pool very fast. Many evergreen trees keep their leaves for several years, maintaining 12.6 Productivity, species richness nutrients in their biomass and not releasing them to the and disturbance system. The soil pool is influenced by soil structural properties such as the proportion of clay, sand and silt Chapter 2 discussed the distribution and primary pro- particles. Water in sandy soils drains easily, leaching ductivity of the major biomes in the world. Product- nutrients away with it. High clay and organic contents ivity in different biomes ranged widely, from less than increase the water and nutrient-holding capacity of 50 g to over 3000 g of carbon per square metre per soil. The presence of peat bogs, coal swamps and fossil year. There is a broad correlation between product- fuel deposits shows that decomposition has lagged ivity and the availability of resources (Fig. 12.3), both behind productivity many times and in many ecosys- within ecosystems and among ecosystems. Generally, tems during the Earth’s history. The result is that much as resources such as light and nutrients increase, plant dead organic material has remained undecomposed for productivity increases. This, in turn supports greater thousands, or even millions, of years. productivity in higher trophic levels. The relationship between resource availability and species richness is not always positive. Studies from a 12.5 Food chains and food webs variety of ecosystems have shown a peak in species The path of energy and matter from one trophic level richness at intermediate levels of resource availability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Species Richness and Species Area Relationships in a Florida Sandhill Monica Ruth Downer University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Plant Species Richness and Species Area Relationships in a Florida Sandhill Monica Ruth Downer University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Biology Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Downer, Monica Ruth, "Plant Species Richness and Species Area Relationships in a Florida Sandhill" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4030 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plant Species Richness and Species Area Relationships in a Florida Sandhill Community by Monica Ruth Downer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Gordon A. Fox, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Earl D. McCoy, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Frederick B. Essig, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 27, 2012 Keywords: Species area curve, burn regime, rank occurrence, heterogeneity, autocorrelation Copyright © 2012, Monica Ruth Downer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to offer special thanks to my major professor, Dr. Gordon A. Fox, for his patience, guidance and many hours devoted to helping me in this endeavor. I would like to thank my committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeochemistry of Mediterranean Wetlands: a Review About the Effects of Water-Level Fluctuations on Phosphorus Cycling and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    water Review Biogeochemistry of Mediterranean Wetlands: A Review about the Effects of Water-Level Fluctuations on Phosphorus Cycling and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inmaculada de Vicente 1,2 1 Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-95-824-9768 2 Instituto del Agua, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain Abstract: Although Mediterranean wetlands are characterized by extreme natural water level fluctu- ations in response to irregular precipitation patterns, global climate change is expected to amplify this pattern by shortening precipitation seasons and increasing the incidence of summer droughts in this area. As a consequence, a part of the lake sediment will be exposed to air-drying in dry years when the water table becomes low. This periodic sediment exposure to dry/wet cycles will likely affect biogeochemical processes. Unexpectedly, to date, few studies are focused on assessing the effects of water level fluctuations on the biogeochemistry of these ecosystems. In this review, we investigate the potential impacts of water level fluctuations on phosphorus dynamics and on greenhouse gases emissions in Mediterranean wetlands. Major drivers of global change, and specially water level fluctuations, will lead to the degradation of water quality in Mediterranean wetlands by increasing the availability of phosphorus concentration in the water column upon rewetting of dry sediment. CO2 fluxes are likely to be enhanced during desiccation, while inundation is likely to decrease cumulative CO emissions, as well as N O emissions, although increasing CH emissions. Citation: de Vicente, I. 2 2 4 Biogeochemistry of Mediterranean However, there exists a complete gap of knowledge about the net effect of water level fluctuations Wetlands: A Review about the Effects induced by global change on greenhouse gases emission.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Economics in Ecosystems By: J
    Energy Economics in Ecosystems By: J. Michael Beman (School of Natural Sciences, University of California at Merced) © 2010 Nature Education Citation: Beman, J. (2010) Energy Economics in Ecosystems. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):13 What powers life? In most ecosystems, sunlight is absorbed and converted into usable forms of energy via photosynthesis. These usable forms of energy are carbon­based. The laws of physics describe the interactions between energy and mass: the energy in a closed system is conserved, and matter can neither be created nor destroyed. Modern physics has shown that reality is more 2 complex at very large and very small scales (e.g., Einstein’s famous equation, E = mc demonstrated that mass can be converted to energy in the sun or nuclear reactors), but in the context of Earth’s ecosystems, energy is conserved and matter can neither be created nor destroyed. This seemingly simplistic statement has profound consequences when we study how ecosystems function. In particular, the energy present within an ecosystem is collected and shared by organisms in many different ways; this "sharing" takes place through ecological interactions, such as predator­prey dynamics and symbioses. When we move to the ecosystem level, however, we consider interactions among organisms, populations, communities, and their physical and chemical environment. These interactions have an important bearing on the structure of organisms, ecosystems, and, over geologic time, the planet itself. A primary example of this involves the energy currency in ecosystems, which is carbon. The amount and form of carbon present in different ecosystem pools — such as plants, animals, air, soil, and water — is controlled by organisms, and ultimately affects their ecological success.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Flow Through Marine Ecosystems: Confronting Transfer Efficiency
    TREE 2756 No. of Pages 11 Trends in Ecology & Evolution Review Energy Flow Through Marine Ecosystems: Confronting Transfer Efficiency Tyler D. Eddy ,1,2,*,@ Joey R. Bernhardt ,3,4,5,@ Julia L. Blanchard,6,7 William W.L. Cheung,3 Mathieu Colléter,8 Hubert du Pontavice ,3,9 Elizabeth A. Fulton,6,10 Didier Gascuel ,9,@ Kelly A. Kearney ,11 Colleen M. Petrik ,12 Tilla Roy,13,14 Ryan R. Rykaczewski ,1,15 Rebecca Selden,16 Charles A. Stock ,17 Colette C.C. Wabnitz ,3,18,19 and Reg A. Watson 6,7 Transfer efficiency is the proportion of energy passed between nodes in food webs. Highlights It is an emergent, unitless property that is difficult to measure, and responds Transfer efficiency is a key parameter de- dynamically to environmental and ecosystem changes. Because the consequences scribing ecosystem structure and func- of changes in transfer efficiency compound through ecosystems, slight variations tion and is used to estimate fisheries production; however, it is also one of can have large effects on food availability for top predators. Here, we review the the most uncertain parameters. processes controlling transfer efficiency, approaches to estimate it, and known variations across ocean biomes. Both process-level analysis and observed macro- Questions remain about how habitats, fi scale variations suggest that ecosystem-scale transfer efficiency is highly variable, food resources, shing pressure, spatio- fi temporal scales, as well as temperature, impacted by shing, and will decline with climate change. It is important that we primary production, and other climate more fully resolve the processes controlling transfer efficiency in models to drivers impact transfer efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Decomposition
    Terrestrial Decomposition • Objectives – Controls over decomposition • Litter breakdown • Soil organic matter formation and dynamics – Carbon balance of ecosystems • Soil carbon storage 1 Overview • In terrestrial ecosystems, soils (organic horizon + mineral soil) > C than in vegetation and atmosphere combined 2 Overview • Decomposition is: 1. Major pathway for C loss from ecosystems 2. Central to ecosystem C loss and storage 3 Overview 4 Incorporation 1 year later Overview • Predominant controls on litter decomposition are fairly well constrained 1. Temperature and moisture 2. Litter quality • N availability • Lignin concentration • Lignin:N • Mechanisms for soil organic matter stabilization: 1. Recalcitrance (refers to chemistry) 2. Physical protection • Within soil aggregates • Organo-mineral associations 3. Substrate supply regulation (energetic limitation) 5 Overview • Disturbance can override millenia in a matter of days or years: 1. Land use change 2. Invasive species 3. Climate change • Understanding the mechanistic drivers of decomposition, soil organic matter formation, and carbon stabilization help us make management decisions, take mitigation steps, and protect resources. 6 Overview Native Ōhiʻa - Koa forest Conversion to Reforestation in grass-dominated pasture (80 yr) Eucalyptus plantation (10 yr) Conventional sugar cane harvest. 20° C 18° C 16° C 14° C 7 Sustainable ratoon harvest. Decomposition • Decomposition is the biological, physical and chemical breakdown of organic material – Provides energy for microbial growth
    [Show full text]
  • Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-Rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/428698; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M. Ward1,2,3*, Airi Idei4, Mayuko Nakagawa2,5, Yuichiro Ueno2,5,6, Woodward W. 4 Fischer3, Shawn E. McGlynn2* 5 6 1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 7 2. Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8550, Japan 8 3. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9 91125 USA 10 4. Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, 11 Japan 12 5. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 13 152-8551, Japan 14 6. Department of Subsurface Geobiological Analysis and Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth 15 Science and Technology, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan 16 Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] 17 18 Abstract 19 Hydrothermal systems, including terrestrial hot springs, contain diverse and systematic 20 arrays of geochemical conditions that vary over short spatial scales due to progressive interaction 21 between the reducing hydrothermal fluids, the oxygenated atmosphere, and in some cases 22 seawater. At Jinata Onsen, on Shikinejima Island, Japan, an intertidal, anoxic, iron- and 23 hydrogen-rich hot spring mixes with the oxygenated atmosphere and sulfate-rich seawater over 24 short spatial scales, creating an enormous range of redox environments over a distance ~10 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Richness, Species–Area Curves and Simpson's Paradox
    Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2000, 2: 791–802 Species richness, species–area curves and Simpson’s paradox Samuel M. Scheiner,1* Stephen B. Cox,2 Michael Willig,2 Gary G. Mittelbach,3 Craig Osenberg4 and Michael Kaspari5 1Department of Life Sciences (2352), Arizona State University West, P.O. Box 37100, Phoenix, AZ 85069, 2Program in Ecology and Conservation Biology, Department of Biological Sciences and The Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, 3W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, 3700 E. Gull Lake Drive, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, 4Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 and 5Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA ABSTRACT A key issue in ecology is how patterns of species diversity differ as a function of scale. The scaling function is the species–area curve. The form of the species–area curve results from patterns of environmental heterogeneity and species dispersal, and may be system-specific. A central concern is how, for a given set of species, the species–area curve varies with respect to a third variable, such as latitude or productivity. Critical is whether the relationship is scale-invariant (i.e. the species–area curves for different levels of the third variable are parallel), rank-invariant (i.e. the curves are non-parallel, but non-crossing within the scales of interest) or neither, in which case the qualitative relationship is scale-dependent. This recognition is critical for the development and testing of theories explaining patterns of species richness because different theories have mechanistic bases at different scales of action.
    [Show full text]
  • European Gradients of Resilience in the Face of Climate Extremes
    EUROPEAN GRADIENTS OF RESILIENCE IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE EXTREMES POLICY BRIEF Field site in Belgium with rainout shelters deployed in 2013 ©Sigi Berwaers This policy brief is based on the results Extreme weather events and the presence of invasive species can act as of the BiodivERsA-funded project pressures threatening biodiversity, resilience and ecosystem services of semi- ‘SIGNAL’ addressing the interaction of three major research areas, combined natural grasslands and drive them beyond thresholds of system integrity in ecology for the first time: biodiversity (tipping points and regime shifts). On the other hand, biodiversity itself may experiments, climate change research, and invasion research. The project made use buffer ecosystem functioning and services against change. Potential stabilising of coordinated experiments in different mechanisms include species richness, presence of key species such as legumes climates across Europe, thereby increasing and within-species diversity. These potential buffers can be promoted by the scope and relevance of the results. conservation management and policy adjustments. K EY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS • Local biodiversity should be actively stimulated or preserved across European grasslands in order to increase the stability of ecosystem service provisioning, which is especially relevant as climate extremes are expected to become more frequent and intense. • Adjustment of mowing frequency and cutting height can help maintain or increase biodiversity. • More explicit consideration of within-species diversity is warranted, as this component of biodiversity can contribute to stabilising ecosystem functioning in the face of climate extremes. • Ecosystem responses to climate extremes of similar magnitude can vary significantly between climates and regions, suggesting that targeted policy requires tailor-made impact predictions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Marine Phosphorus Cycle: Sensitivity to Oceanic Circulation
    Biogeosciences, 4, 155–171, 2007 www.biogeosciences.net/4/155/2007/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The global marine phosphorus cycle: sensitivity to oceanic circulation C. P. Slomp and P. Van Cappellen Department of Earth Sciences – Geochemistry, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80021, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands Received: 4 September 2006 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 5 October 2006 Revised: 8 January 2007 – Accepted: 20 February 2007 – Published: 22 February 2007 Abstract. A new mass balance model for the coupled ma- stand long-term variations in marine biological activity, at- rine cycles of phosphorus (P) and carbon (C) is used to ex- mospheric composition and climate (Holland, 1984; Van amine the relationships between oceanic circulation, primary Cappellen and Ingall, 1996; Petsch and Berner, 1998; Bjer- productivity, and sedimentary burial of reactive P and partic- rum and Canfield, 2002). Important forcings include the sup- ulate organic C (POC), on geological time scales. The model ply of reactive P from the continents, oceanic circulation and explicitly represents the exchanges of water and particulate sea level fluctuations (Follmi,¨ 1996; Compton et al., 2000; matter between the continental shelves and the open ocean, Handoh and Lenton, 2003; Wallmann, 2003; Bjerrum et al., and it accounts for the redox-dependent burial of POC and 2006). the various forms of reactive P (iron(III)-bound P, particu- Upward transport of nutrient-rich water sustains biologi- late organic P (POP), authigenic calcium phosphate, and fish cal activity in marine surface waters. Vertical mixing, how- debris). Steady state and transient simulations indicate that ever, also controls the ventilation of the deeper ocean waters, a slowing down of global ocean circulation decreases pri- which in turn has a major effect on the sedimentary burial mary production in the open ocean, but increases that in the of phosphorus.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Connectivity Within the Castle Parks, Alberta, Canada by Breanna Beaver Submit
    Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Connectivity within The Castle Parks, Alberta, Canada by Breanna Beaver Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Environmental Science Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY December, 2017 Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Connectivity within The Castle Parks, Alberta, Canada Breanna Beaver I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Breanna Beaver, Student Date Approvals: Dawna Cerney, Thesis Advisor Date Peter Kimosop, Committee Member Date Felicia Armstrong, Committee Member Date Clayton Whitesides, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date Abstract Habitat fragmentation is an important subject of research needed by park management planners, particularly for conservation management. The Castle Parks, in southwest Alberta, Canada, exhibit extensive habitat fragmentation from recreational and resource use activities. Umbrella and keystone species within The Castle Parks include grizzly bears, wolverines, cougars, and elk which are important animals used for conservation agendas to help protect the matrix of the ecosystem. This study identified and analyzed the nature of habitat fragmentation within The Castle Parks for these species, and has identified geographic areas of habitat fragmentation concern. This was accomplished using remote sensing, ArcGIS, and statistical analyses, to develop models of fragmentation for ecosystem cover type and Digital Elevation Models of slope, which acted as proxies for species habitat suitability.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Systems of the United States a Working Classification of U.S
    ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES A WORKING CLASSIFICATION OF U.S. TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS NatureServe is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation action. Citation: Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schulz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. © NatureServe 2003 Ecological Systems of the United States is a component of NatureServe’s International Terrestrial Ecological Systems Classification. Á Funding for this report was provided by a grant from The Nature Conservancy. Front cover: Maroon Bells Wilderness, Colorado. Photo © Patrick Comer NatureServe 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 908-1800 www.natureserve.org ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES A WORKING CLASSIFICATION OF U.S. TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS Á Á Á Á Á Patrick Comer Don Faber-Langendoen Rob Evans Sue Gawler Carmen Josse Gwen Kittel Shannon Menard Milo Pyne Marion Reid Keith Schulz Kristin Snow Judy Teague June 2003 Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge the generous support provided by The Nature Conservancy for this effort to classify and characterize the ecological systems of the United States. We are particularly grateful to the late John Sawhill, past President of The Nature Conservancy, who was an early supporter of this concept, and who made this funding possible through an allocation from the President’s Discretionary Fund. Many of the concepts and approaches for defining and applying ecological systems have greatly benefited from collaborations with Conservancy staff, and the classification has been refined during its application in Conservancy-sponsored conservation assessments.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Systems and Interactions
    The Earth System Earth Systems and Interactions Key Concepts • How do Earth systems What do you think? Read the three statements below and decide interact in the carbon whether you agree or disagree with them. Place an A in the Before column cycle? if you agree with the statement or a D if you disagree. After you’ve read • How do Earth systems this lesson, reread the statements to see if you have changed your mind. interact in the phosphorus Before Statement After cycle? 1. The amount of water on Earth remains constant over time. 2. Hydrogen makes up the hydrosphere. 3. Most carbon on Earth is in the atmosphere. 3TUDY#OACH Earth Systems Make a Table Contrast the carbon cycle and the Your body contains many systems. These systems work phosphorus cycle in a two- together and make one big system—your body. Earth is a column table. Label one system, too. Like you, Earth has smaller systems that work column Carbon Cycle and together, or interact, and make the larger Earth system. Four the other column Phosphorus of these smaller systems are the atmosphere, the Cycle. Complete the table hydrosphere, the geosphere, and the biosphere. as you read this lesson. The Atmosphere Reading Check The outermost Earth system is a mixture of gases and 1. Identify What systems particles of matter called the atmosphere. It forms a layer make up the larger Earth around the other Earth systems. The atmosphere is mainly system? nitrogen and oxygen. Gases in the atmosphere move freely, helping transport matter and energy among Earth systems.
    [Show full text]