DOCSLIB.ORG

River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill FEASIBILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING ASSESSMENT November 2011 Reference number/code We are The Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Anglian Region, Eastern Area Dragonfly House 2 Gilders Way Norwich NR Tel: 03708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47: Feasibility and Environmental Scoping Report River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill Feasibility & Environmental Scoping Assessment September 2011 Notice This report was produced by Atkins for the Environment Agency for the specific purpose of assessing the feasibility of restoring favourable condition to the River Wensum SSSI. This report may not be used by any person other than the Environment Agency without Environment Agency express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than the Environment Agency. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5078052 DOCUMENT REF: 5078052/60/DG/069 Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date v.01 Initial Draft Ian Morrissey Kevin Skinner 20/08/2010 Final Draft Final draft for internal review Ian Morrissey Aurelie Paoli Kevin Skinner Don Ross 14/10/2010 Final Final for issue Ian Morrissey Aurelie Paoli Kevin Skinner Don Ross 8/09/2011 Final For publication Ian Morrissey Ellen Derbyshire Kevin Skinner Don Ross 4/11/2011 Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill_Final.docx River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47: Feasibility and Environmental Scoping Report Contents Section Page Non Technical Summary 1 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Context 3 1.2 River Wensum Restoration Strategy 7 1.3 Feasibility Assessment aims 9 1.4 Methodology 9 2. Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill Overview 12 2.1 Terminology and site location 12 2.2 Previous works within Unit 47 15 2.3 RWRS restoration vision for Unit 47 15 3. Environmental Baseline 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Common environment features across all reaches 18 3.3 Environmental baseline for each reach within Unit 47 31 4. Consultation 61 4.1 Introduction 61 4.2 Consultation with key stakeholders 61 4.3 Drop-in session September 2009 63 4.4 Future consultation 63 5. Multi-Criteria Analysis Options Appraisal 65 5.1 Introduction 65 5.2 Constructing the MCA tool 65 5.3 Using the MCA tool 71 6. Developing Conceptual Design 83 6.1 Introduction and approach 83 6.2 Description of River Restoration and Targeted Maintenance options 83 6.3 Reach 26: Fakenham Reach 91 6.4 Reach 27: Hempton Reach 95 6.5 Reach 28: Moor Reach 99 6.6 Reach 29: Shereford Reach 105 6.7 Reach 30: South Mill Reach 110 6.8 Reach 31: Confluence Reach 114 7. Cost Estimate 118 7.1 Previous cost estimates 118 7.2 Present cost estimates 119 7.3 Potential cost savings 120 7.4 Delivery 123 7.5 Summary 125 8. Scoping 128 8.1 Introduction 128 8.2 Method of assessment 130 8.3 Results of scoping 131 Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill_Final.docx River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47: Feasibility and Environmental Scoping Report 9. Consents 139 10. Project Risks 141 11. Conclusions and Recommendations 143 11.1 Conclusions 143 11.2 Recommendations 144 12. References 145 Appendices 147 Appendix A – Multi-Criteria Analysis technical note Appendix B – Costings Appendix C – Ecology tables Appendix D – Terrestrial SSSI unit links to River Wensum SSSI units List of Figures Figure 1.1- Unit 47 River Wensum location plan 4 Figure 1.2 – Environmental and restoration related investigations and events, showing how this assessment fits within the process of realising restoration on the River Wensum 6 Figure 1.3 - The approach adopted during feasibility assessment for determining the recommended restoration option on individual reaches and the overall river unit 10 Figure 2.1 - Location of Reaches 26 to 31 within Unit 47 14 Figure 3.1 - Environmental constraints on Unit 47 27 Figure 3.2 - Environmental baseline for Reach 26 (Fakenham Reach) 34 Figure 3.3 - Environmental baseline for Reach 27 (Hempton Reach) 38 Figure 3.4 - Environmental baseline for Reach 28 (Moor Reach) 42 Figure 3.5 - Environmental baseline for Reach 29 (Shereford Reach) 46 Figure 3.6 - Environmental baseline for Reach 30 (South Mill Reach) 49 Figure 3.7 - Environmental baseline for Reach 31 (Confluence Reach) 52 Figure 6.1 - Conceptual restoration plan for Reach 26 (Fakenham Reach) 94 Figure 6.2 - Conceptual restoration plan for Reach 27 (Hempton Reach) 98 Figure 6.3 - Conceptual restoration plan for Reach 28 (Moor Reach) 104 Figure 6.4 - Conceptual restoration plan for Reach 29 (Shereford Reach) 109 Figure 6.5 - Conceptual restoration plan for Reach 30 (South Mill Reach) 113 Figure 6.6 - Conceptual restoration plan for Reach 31 (Confluence Reach) 117 Figure 8.1 - Environmental Scoping within the EIA process 129 List of Tables Table 1.1 - Chapters constituting this report 7 Table 2.1- Summary of previous restoration works consented on Unit 47 (JBA, 2007) 15 Table 2.2 - Recommended restoration measures for each reach in Unit 47 as provided in the RWRS (JBA, 2007) 16 Table 3.1 - Mill details in Unit 47 (Environment Agency, 2007) 24 Table 3.2 - Water quality (Environment Agency, 2010) 25 Table 3.3 - Condition summary of Unit 47 attributes (Natural England, 2010) 26 Table 3.4 - Baseline information common to Unit 47 28 Table 3.5 - Baseline information specific to Reach 26 (Fakenham Reach) 31 Table 3.6 - Baseline information specific to Reach 27 (Hempton Reach) 35 Table 3.7 - Baseline information specific to Reach 28 (Moor Reach) 39 Table 3.8 - Baseline information specific to Reach 29 (Shereford Reach) 43 Unit 47 Tatterford Common to Fakenham Mill_Final.docx River Wensum Restoration Strategy Implementation SSSI Unit 47: Feasibility and Environmental Scoping Report Table 3.9 - Baseline information specific to Reach 30 (South Mill Reach) 47 Table 3.10 - Baseline information specific to Reach 31 (Confluence Reach) 50 Table 4.1 - Consultation undertaken to date (August 2010) 61 Table 5.1 - Overview of the process by which the MCA was constructed and applied 65 Table 5.2 - Restoration measures recommended in previous studies 66 Table 5.3 - Options identified for restoration on the River Wensum 67 Table 5.4 - Description of river restoration measures as defined under option G5 68 Table 5.5 - Criteria defined for the MCA 70 Table 5.6 - Scoring system defined for the Multi-Criteria Analysis 71 Table 5.7 - Results of MCA for Reach 26 (Fakenham Reach) 73 Table 5.8 - Results of MCA for Reach 27 (Hempton Reach) 74 Table 5.9 - Results of MCA for Reach 28 (Moor Reach) 75 Table 5.10 - Results of MCA for Reach 29 (Shereford Reach) 76 Table 5.11 - Results of MCA for Reach 30 (South Mill Reach) 77 Table 5.12 - Results of MCA for Reach 31 (Confluence Reach) 78 Table 5.13 - Summary of favourable options and measures for Unit 47 81 Table 6.1 - Different management classes of restoration activity 84 Table 6.2 - Active and passive river restoration measures 84 Table 6.3 - River restoration measures and their potential ecological benefits 87 Table 6.4 - The effect of river restoration measures according to flow condition 89 Table 6.5 - Significant features and possible measures observed for Reach 26 during site visit 91 Table 6.6 - Review of strategy objectives and recommendations for Reach 26 92 Table 6.7 - Recommended restoration options for Reach 26 93 Table 6.8 - Significant features and possible measures observed for Reach 27 during site visit 95 Table 6.9 - Review of strategy objectives and recommendations for Reach 27 96 Table 6.10 - Recommended restoration options for Reach 27 97 Table 6.11 - Significant features and possible measures observed for Reach 28 during site visit 99 Table 6.12 - Review of strategy objectives and recommendations for Reach 28 101 Table 6.13 - Recommended restoration options for Reach 28 102 Table 6.14 - Significant features and possible measures observed for Reach 29 during site visit 105 Table 6.15 - Review of strategy objectives and recommendations for Reach 29 106 Table 6.16 - Recommended restoration options for Reach 29 107 Table 6.17 - Significant features and possible measures observed for Reach 30 during site visit 110 Table 6.18 - Review of strategy objectives and recommendations 111 Table 6.19 - Recommended restoration options for Reach 30 112 Table 6.20 - Significant features and possible measures observed for Reach 31 during site visit 114 Table 6.21 - Review of strategy objectives and recommendations 115 Table 6.22 - Recommended restoration options for Reach 31 115 Table 7.1 - RWRS Unit 47 cost estimate (JBA, 2007) 118 Table 7.2 - Halcrow PSA Unit 47 cost estimate 119 Table 7.3 - Comparison of cost estimates between JBA and Halcrow reports for Unit 47 119 Table 7.4 - Unit 47 cost estimates for various
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)
    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
    Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations & Policies Document, Wymondham Area Action Plan, Long Stratton Area Action Plan and Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan, undertaken for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Natural Environment Team HRA of Site Allocations Document, Wymondham AAP, Long Stratton AAP and Cringleford Neighbourhood Plan for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations and Policies Document, the Wymondham Area Action Plan, the Long Stratton Area Action Plan and the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan Executive Summary As required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, before deciding to give consent or permission for a plan or project which is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, the competent authority is required to make an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives. This document is a record of the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Sites Allocation Document, undertaken for South Norfolk Council. Additionally, proposed development at Wymondham, as described in the emerging Wymondham Area Action Plan, at Long Stratton, as described in the emerging Long Stratton Area Action Plan and proposed housing in the parish of Cringleford, guided by the emerging Cringleford Draft Neighbourhood Plan, are assessed Three groups of plans are reviewed with respect to their conclusions with respect to potential in-combination effects. These are plans for The Greater Norwich Development Partnership, Great Yarmouth Borough Council, Breckland District Council, and The Broads Authority including local development plans and the Tourism Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List Of
    County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List of 1471412 It 44 Norfolk Census 1851 Index 6115160 Norfolk Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It 1 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1811-1825 375230 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1825-1839 375231 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1839-1859 375232 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1715-1734 1596461 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1734-1749 1596462 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1770-1774 1596563 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1774-1781 1596564 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1790-1797 1596566 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1798-1803 1596567 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1812-1819 1596597 Norfolk Marriages Parish Registers 1539-1812 496683 It 2 Norfolk Probate Inventories Index 1674-1825 1471414 It 17-20 Norfolk Tax Assessments 1692-1806 1471412 It 30-43 Norfolk Wills V.101 1854-1857 167184 Norfolk Alburgh Parish Register Extracts 1538-1715 894712 It 5 Norfolk Alby Parish Records 1600-1812 1526778 It 15 Norfolk Aldeby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 6 Norfolk Alethorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Arminghall Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Ashby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 7 Norfolk Ashby Parish Register Extracts 1646 894712 It 5 Norfolk Ashwell-Thorpe Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Aslacton Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Baconsthorpe Parish Register Extracts 1676-1770 894712 It 6 Norfolk Bagthorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Bale Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Bale Parish Register Extracts 1538-1716 894712 It 6 Norfolk Barmer Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barney Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barton-Bendish Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 3 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: PB5640-005-2214 Date: October 2018 Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 20/07/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD DT 20/09/18 01F Final for PEIR submission GC CD AD/JL Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 27 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation Responses 2 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iv This page is intentionally blank. Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page v 1 Introduction 1. Consultation is a key driver of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, and throughout the lifecycle of the project, from the initial stages through to consent and post-consent. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree Maker
    Descendants of Henry High 1 Henry High b: Abt. 1745 . +Elizabeth Fill m: 06 Aug 1764 in Briston .... 2 Benjamin High b: 09 Sep 1764 in Briston d: 12 Nov 1848 in Cley next the Sea ........ +Mary Wilkinson b: 1769 m: 29 Dec 1791 in Booton d: 19 Apr 1829 in Cley next the Sea ........... 3 Benjamin High b: 29 Apr 1792 in Booton d: Abt. Jun 1879 in Walsingham District ............... +Mary Josh b: Abt. 1792 in Mattishall d: Abt. Dec 1880 in Walsingham District .................. 4 Benjamin High b: 03 Feb 1817 in Glandford d: Bef. 1841 .................. 4 Henry High b: 01 Apr 1818 in Glandford d: 05 Nov 1886 in Wood Norton ..................... +Mary Ann Pitcher b: Abt. 1824 in Weybourne m: Abt. Jun 1845 in Walsingham District ........................ 5 Benjamin High b: 07 Sep 1845 in Weybourne d: 28 Jul 1851 in Wiveton ........................ 5 Mary Elizabeth High b: Abt. 1847 in Wiveton ........................ 5 William Henry High b: 10 Sep 1854 in Wiveton Norfolk ............................ +Elizabeth Handley b: Abt. 1858 in Carlton Notts m: Abt. Dec 1876 in Leeds District ............................... 6 Ada Florry High b: Abt. 1878 in Wortley Leeds Yorkshire ................................... +Henry Knaggs b: Abt. 1879 m: Abt. Sep 1907 in Hunslet District ............................... 6 Gertrude Annie High b: Abt. Dec 1884 in Hunslet Leeds ............................... 6 William Martin High b: Abt. Mar 1887 in Hunslet Leeds ............................... 6 Nellie High b: Abt. Sep 1889 in Hunslet Leeds .................. *2nd Wife of Henry High: ..................... +Charlotte Edwards b: Abt. 1857 in Mattishall m: Abt. Sep 1880 in Mitford District ........................ 5 Beatrice High b: Abt. 1878 in Wood Norton .......................
    [Show full text]
  • River Wensum Restoration Strategy
    Appendix 2 Mill summary sheets HELLESDON MILL Table Ba1 Hellesdon Mill Location Mill name: Hellesdon Mill National grid reference: 619800, 310500 Upstream catchment area: 650km2 Length of channel to next mill upstream: 5km Geomorphological Appraisal (2006) reaches: W50 River Wensum Restoration Strategy reach RWRS 01 code: Mill owner: Environment Agency (site only, mill buildings demolished) Sluice owner: Environment Agency Owner of water rights: Environment Agency Listed status: None Plate Ba1 Left: View of one of the fixed weirs at Hellesdon Mill: Right: Hellesdon Mill viewed from downstream 234 Table Ba2 Hellesdon Mill Weir & channel details Water control level: 3.85m AOD Drop: 1.21m (to 2.64m AOD) Length of backwater 5km (100% reach) upstream: Main structure: Block A: 1 flume with a steel control sluice and a horizontal steel penstock plus 3 fixed weirs with stop-log facilities and weed screens; Block B: An automated, bottom hinged overshot tilting gate. Invert 2.52m AOD Operation of main Block A: Permits majority of flow to enter the section below the mill. Sluice only structure: used during high flows in conjunction with Tud sluices; Block B: Controls mean water level upstream in the River Wensum. By-pass structure: Tud sluice acts as bypass channel - see below By-pass structure Automated operation: Gauging station: None Table Ba3 Hellesdon Mill Previous works or recommendations Previous measures: Sluice connecting the River Wensum to the River Tud (about 100m upstream of the main sluices) was automated in 1999. This allows the Environment Agency to accurately maintain water levels upstream of the mill. Geomorphological De-silt reach.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED Election of Parish
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Norfolk Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Councillor for Aldborough and Thurgarton Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* BAILLIE The Bays, Chapel Murat Anne M Tony Road, Thurgarton, Norwich, NR11 7NP ELLIOTT Sunholme, The Elliott Ruth Paul Martin Green, Aldborough, NR11 7AA GALLANT Spring Cottage, The Elliott Paul M David Peter Green, Aldborough, NR11 7AA WHEELER 4 Pipits Meadow, Grieves John B Jean Elizabeth Aldborough, NR11 7NW WORDINGHAM Two Oaks, Freeman James H J Peter Thurgarton Road, Aldborough, NR11 7NY *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Dated: Friday 10 April 2015 Sheila Oxtoby Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Electoral Services, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, Norfolk, NR27 9EN STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Norfolk Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Councillor for Antingham Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* EVERSON Margra, Southrepps Long Trevor F Graham Fredrick Road, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP JONES The Old Coach Independent Bacon Robert H Graham House, Antingham Hall, Cromer Road, Antingham, N. Walsham, NR28 0NJ LONG The Old Forge, Everson Graham F Trevor Francis Elderton Lane, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NR LOVE Holly Cottage, McLeod Lynn W Steven Paul Antingham Hill, North Walsham, Norfolk, NR28 0NH PARAMOR Field View, Long Trevor F Stuart John Southrepps Road, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated.
    [Show full text]