The Eruvin in Brooklyn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eruvin in Brooklyn 9 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR פה ונתפגשנו אחר ושוחחנו בד"ת והי' The Eruvin in Brooklyn שם נוכח גם אחד מחשובי וגדולי הרבנים דעדה הספרדית בפלעדבוש -RABBI ADAM MINTZ’S im ושאל אותו אודות העירוב בפלעטבוש portant historical review of the מה דעתו ועכ"פ לנשים וקטנים והשיב eruvin in Brooklyn omits men- 1 לו שלא זאת נשים וקטנים מותרים tion of the eruv established by לטלטל על סמך עירוב אלא אפילו the Sephardic Rabbinical Coun- הוא בעצמו מותר לטלטל והרב הנ "ל " בקש ממנו שיתן לו הדבר בכתב cil. This eruv has since obtained והשיב לו שמפחד מליכנס בדבר מפני the public endorsement of Rav החולקין (ואוי לנו שכך עלתה בימינו -Ovadia Yosef and other Sephar שגדולי הדור מפחדים מלהגיד דעתם dic gedolei Torah, copies of אבל המציאות הוא מציאות) ובעזה "י which are now to be found on ראינו ושמע הדברים ד' רבנים the Sephardic Erub web site חשובים וגדולי התורה שהיו שם .www. erub.org וכלנו חיים תהלה לא - ל ואין החי However, in 1983 it was not מכחיש את החי וא"כ יש להם לעדה הספרדית הקדושה בפלעטבוש פסק clear if Rav Menashe Klein’s ברור מגדול הפוסקים שלהם וכדאי heter was appropriate only for הוא לסמוך עליו אפילו שלא בשעת -Ashkenazim, or whether Se הדחק. phardim too might rely on it. I therefore wrote to Rav Klein asking him for clarification. His Please be good enough to see response, dated the 4th night of my Mishane Halakhot, vol. 8, Hanukka 5744 (1983), follows siman 103. Brooklyn is sur- with my free translation. Inter rounded by man-made alia, it reflects the acrimonious mehiz ot , and in such a situa- debate surrounding the eruv tion all agree to the possibil- which Rabbi Mintz mentioned. ity of establishing an eruv. But our Sephardic brethren do not have to rely on my הנה ימחול נא לעיין בספרי משנה -psak. A few weeks ago I visit הלכות ח"ח סי' ק"ב דברוקלין מוקף ed HaRav HaGaon Ovadia מחיצות עשוי בידי אדם וכה"ג כ "ע " מודים ועיין עוד שם סי' קמ "א ועוד " Yosef, Shalit”a, the former בכמה מקומות האמנם לעדה הקדושה Rishon leTzion, and was able של אחינו בני ישראל הספרדים בכאן באמת שאין צריכין לסמוך על פסקי -Unclear in original. Perhaps in 1 שלי כי לפני כמה שבועות בקרתי פה .ed ,רק read ,זאת stead of אצל הרב הגאון עובדיה יוסף שליט "א " (מלפנים הרב הראשון לציון) ושהה Ḥ akirah 15 © 2013 10 : Hakirah,̣ The Flatbush Journal of Jewish Law and Thought to exchange divrei Torah with various chronologies of the Exo- him. Present there too was dus (Hakirah 14). However, he one of the important rabbis does not give sufficient weight to of the Flatbush Sephardic the possibility that Yosef’s rise community who asked his to power coincided with Hyksos opinion regarding the Flat- rule, rather than preceded it. bush eruv: Could at least Here the internal evidence of the women and small children re- Torah is conclusive, in my opin- ly on it? He responded that ion. No fewer than six passages not only could women and of the Yosef story are best or children rely on it, but he too solely explained by reference to could. When the rabbi asked Hyksos rule: him to put it in writing, he replied that he feared getting 1) “Yosef was taken down to involved in the fighting re- Egypt, and Potiphar, minister of garding the eruv. (Woe to us executions, an Egyptian, pur- that we have reached a point chased him” (Bereishit 39:1). One where gedolei haDor fear to would hardly need to identify a say publicly their position, high official in Egypt as “an but such is the case.) With Egyptian”—what else would he God’s help, four important be?—were it not that, under rabbis and gedolei hora’a were Hyksos rule, a native-born min- there and heard this and, ister was an anomaly. We choose thank God, we are all alive, to translate sar ha-tabahim as and what was said cannot be “minister of executions” rather contradicted. Therefore, the than chief cook, because the Holy Sephardic Community prison system was within his in Flatbush has a definitive purview (40:3-4, 41:10). Why, psak from one of its major then, appoint an Egyptian as poskim, and it can be relied chief executioner? So that the upon even in non-emergency hatred of the people be focused situations. on him rather than on his Hyk- sos overlords. Much the same Joel B. Wolowelsky consideration prompted Polish Brooklyn, NY landowners to appoint Jews as tax collectors. Dating the Exodus 2) “He gave him Asnat the JUDAH LANDA HAS provided us daughter of Poti Phera, priest of with an erudite discussion of the On, as a wife” (41:45). The Letters to the Editor : 11 Egyptians could not even eat themselves and their allies. together with the Hebrews “be- cause it was an abomination to 6) “A new king arose in Egypt the Egyptians” (43:32), so how who knew not Yosef” (Shemot could they marry them? Rather, 1:8). A new, Egyptian dynasty Asnat was not an Egyptian but a arose that threw out the Hyksos. daughter of the Hyksos ruling Following standard practice, it class, which had no taboos blotted out all memory of the against foreigners. previous rulers and administra- tion. 3) “Yosef recognized his broth- ers, but they did not recognize Much of the above, particu- him” (42:8). Were Yosef a for- larly 1) and 6), has already been eigner in an otherwise Egyptian remarked upon by modern court, the brothers would have commentators. We will intro- made a special effort to note just duce, however, an additional who was this official with singu- hypothesis: Potifar, Yosef’s mas- larly Semitic features. As it was, ter, was an Egyptian, but his wife as a minister in a quasi-Semitic was a Hyksos.2 Perhaps, as with Hyksos government his origins Yosef and Asnat, the practice attracted no attention. was to give new ministers a wife from the ruling circles—if only 4) “The news reached Pharaoh’s to keep watch over them.3 house that Yosef’s brothers had This explains the astonishing come, and it was welcomed by latitude Potifar’s wife gave her- Pharaoh and his servants” self in speaking about, and to, (45:16). The non-Egyptian rulers her husband. “She called the men welcomed the arrival of more of her house (anshei beitah4) and Semites, as reinforcements. 2 5) “So that you dwell in the land This casts her infatuation with of Goshen, for all shepherds are Yosef in a new light, both being non-Egyptian. an abomination to the Egyp- 3 Another possibility is that he tians” (46:34). Goshen was “the married her as a means of gaining best part of the country” (47:6), access to the ruling circles. In either and why would the Egyptians case, Potifar ignored his own peo- give it to those they abominated? ple’s taboos. Rather, the Hyksos, themselves 4 Not to be confused with anshei shepherds, ruled the country, ha-bayit, “men of the house” (serv- and they took the best parts for ants) in v. 11, and see my Hibah 12 : Hakirah,̣ The Flatbush Journal of Jewish Law and Thought told them, ‘See, he brought us a (40:4). But as a lone Egyptian in Hebrew (ish ivri) to ridicule us’” a Hyksos court, his hands were (Bereishit 39:14). When Potifar tied. He could not free Yosef returned, “She spoke to him in without further incurring the the same way: ‘The Hebrew wrath of his wife’s family, who slave you brought us came to were closer to the center of ridicule [or: have relations with] power than he was. Yosef knew me.’” It is remarkable for a high this and so did not ask the chief official’s wife to express such cup-bearer to intercede with disdain for her husband, let Potifar on his behalf, but only alone to her servants, and incon- with Pharaoh (40:14). ceivable that she class herself to- The wider significance of the gether with the latter, “he Hyksos connection is that it re- brought us....” Rather, “men of veals the intrinsic fragility of her house” means men of her Israel’s foothold in Egypt: the family. She called in her Hyksos Hyksos were a foreign graft in relatives to complain to them Egypt destined to be rejected, about her Egyptian husband. and with their overthrow, the This is the sting in her accusa- reaction against Israel was only a tion: “He brought us an ish ivri matter of time. The rise to pow- to ridicule us.” Ivri means one er of Yosef under a Hyksos re- who came from over (me-eiver) gime contained within it the the Euphrates River, and can seeds of Israel’s enslavement. refer to any Semite. Potifar, the Egyptian, had made a point of Rabbi Yehudah Henkin buying a Semitic slave in order Jerusalem to ridicule and denigrate the part-Semitic Hyksos in whose I WOULD LIKE to commend you government he served! for publishing Judah Landa’s Potifar was furious, but not article on the dating of the Exo- at Yosef. Had he entertained the dus. I have also written an article possibility that his wife was tell- on this topic (The Date of the Ex- ing the truth, he would have ex- odus: A Guide to the Orthodox ecuted Yosef, and certainly not Perplexed). I use largely the same have placed him in the highest- sources, but come to a different quality prison (39:20) and con- conclusion.
Recommended publications
  • The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha
    t HaRofei LeShvurei Leiv: The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha Senior Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Prof. Reuven Kimelman, Advisor Prof. Zvi Zohar, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts by Ezra Cohen December 2018 Accepted with Highest Honors Copyright by Ezra Cohen Committee Members Name: Prof. Reuven Kimelman Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Lynn Kaye Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Zvi Zohar Signature: ______________________ Table of Contents A Brief Word & Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………... iii Chapter I: Setting the Stage………………………………………………………………………. 1 a. Why This Thesis is Important Right Now………………………………………... 1 b. Defining Key Terms……………………………………………………………… 4 i. Defining Depression……………………………………………………… 5 ii. Defining Halakha…………………………………………………………. 9 c. A Short History of Depression in Halakhic Literature …………………………. 12 Chapter II: The Contemporary Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 d. Depression & Music Therapy…………………………………………………… 19 e. Depression & Shabbat/Holidays………………………………………………… 28 f. Depression & Abortion…………………………………………………………. 38 g. Depression & Contraception……………………………………………………. 47 h. Depression & Romantic Relationships…………………………………………. 56 i. Depression & Prayer……………………………………………………………. 70 j. Depression &
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Beginning the Conversation
    NOTES 1 Beginning the Conversation 1. Jacob Katz, Exclusiveness and Tolerance: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Medieval and Modern Times (New York: Schocken, 1969). 2. John Micklethwait, “In God’s Name: A Special Report on Religion and Public Life,” The Economist, London November 3–9, 2007. 3. Mark Lila, “Earthly Powers,” NYT, April 2, 2006. 4. When we mention the clash of civilizations, we think of either the Spengler battle, or a more benign interplay between cultures in individual lives. For the Spengler battle, see Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). For a more benign interplay in individual lives, see Thomas L. Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1999). 5. Micklethwait, “In God’s Name.” 6. Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005). “Interview with Robert Wuthnow” Religion and Ethics Newsweekly April 26, 2002. Episode no. 534 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week534/ rwuthnow.html 7. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, 291. 8. Eric Sharpe, “Dialogue,” in Mircea Eliade and Charles J. Adams, The Encyclopedia of Religion, first edition, volume 4 (New York: Macmillan, 1987), 345–8. 9. Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald and John Borelli, Interfaith Dialogue: A Catholic View (London: SPCK, 2006). 10. Lily Edelman, Face to Face: A Primer in Dialogue (Washington, DC: B’nai B’rith, Adult Jewish Education, 1967). 11. Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament (New York: Knopf, 1967), 5, 11. 12. Ibid., 375.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Jews Opening the Ark Rabbi David Booth
    Non Jews Opening the Ark - Rabbi David Booth Draft Copy Not for Distribution Non-Jews Opening the Ark Rabbi David Booth Approved by the CJLS on October 15, 2013 by a vote of 8 in favor, 12 opposed and 4 abstaining. In favor: Rabbis Kassel Abelson, Aaron Alexander, David Booth, Elliot Dorff, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Daniel Nevins, Loel Weiss and Steven Wernick. Opposed: Pamela Barmash, Miriam Berkowitz, Reuven Hammer, Joshua Heller, David Hoffman, Jane Kanarek, Adam Kligfeld, Gail Labovitz, Amy Levin, Paul Plotkin, Avram Reisner, and Barry Starr. Abstaining: Baruch Frydman-Kohl, Susan Grossman, Jonathan Lubliner, Elie Spitz Question: May the ritual opening of the holy ark during worship be performed by non- Jews? Response Introduction Answering the question requires several steps. Given the relative absence of direct comment on this issue in either medieval or modern responsa literature, a case must be developed from similar issues that are addressed. Further, the issue itself is relatively recent. Few non-Jews sought such an honor until relatively recently. The integration of the Jewish community into the wider American context has raised for many congregations a variety of questions around the status of non-Jews that received little attention prior to the modern era. This teshuvah will first address the question of qualifications to touch a Torah scroll as a means of exploring what requirements might exist in the related and possibly more lenient case of opening the ark. Second, the teshuvah will explore the opening of the ark on its own terms in medieval and modern sources to identify whether or not it can be spoken of separately from removing the Torah.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Philosophy and the Mishnah: on the History of Love That Does Not Depend on a Thing*
    Greek Philosophy and the Mishnah: On the History of Love that Does Not Depend on a Thing* GABRIEL DANZIG In the fifth chapter ofAvot we read: כל אהבה שהיא תלויה בדבר—בטל דבר, בטלה אהבה; ושאינה תלויה בדבר — אינה בטילה לעולם. איזו היא אהבה שהיא תלויה בדבר, זו אהבת אמנון ותמר; ושאינה תלויה בדבר, זו אהבת דויד ויהונתן Any love that is dependent on a thing – when the thing is gone, the love is gone; but a love that is not dependent on a thing will never dissolve. What is a love that is dependent on a thing? This is the love of Amnon and Tamar. And one that is not dependent on a thing? This is the love of David and Jonathan.1 (Mish. Avot 5.16) Anyone familiar with Greek philosophical reflections on love and friendship will immediately sense a resemblance. The distinction between love based on sexual pleasure and higher forms of love is found in both Plato and Aristotle. In Plato’s Symposium we find the following: * The Bar Ilan responsa project enabled me to locate many of the passages referred to in this paper. I thank Steve Harvey, Lawrence Schiffman, Joel Kaminsky and an anonymous reader for comments which substantially improved this paper. I also thank Prof. Schaps for his many invaluable suggestions and improvements as editor. This paper is a small token of my admiration for Ranon, and for his unique ability to combine the intellectual and personal virtues of the world of Torah learning with those of the academic world. 1 All translations are my own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eruvin in Brooklyn
    21 A Chapter in American Orthodoxy: The Eruvin in Brooklyn By: ADAM MINTZ The history and halakhah of the eruvin in Brooklyn are both com- plicated and controversial. Jews began to move to Brooklyn in sig- nificant numbers after the completion of the Brooklyn Bridge in 1883, many moving from the overcrowded Lower East Side and looking for open space and more affordable housing. With the building of the subways in the first decade of the twentieth century and the completion of the Williamsburg Bridge in 1903, Williams- burg became the first Jewish community in Brooklyn with syna- gogues and other Jewish institutions and shops opening in the neighborhood. By 1927, 35 percent of Brooklyn’s population was Jewish and Samuel Abelow, an early historian of Jewish Brooklyn, wrote that “The growth of the Jewish community was one of the remarkable social phenomena in history.”1 Yet, as the Orthodox community continued to expand throughout Brooklyn in the mid- dle decades of the century, there was no recorded attempt to create an eruv enclosing either the entire borough or communities within it.2 The first mention of the possibility of an eruv in Brooklyn was included in one of the earliest discussions regarding the creation of 1 Samuel P. Abelow, History of Brooklyn Jewry (Brooklyn, NY, 1937) 13. 2 For the history of the Jews of Brooklyn, see Abelow, History of Brooklyn Jewry, Jews of Brooklyn, edited by Ilana Abramovitch and Sean Galvin (Waltham, MA, 2002), 1–17 and the references in Deborah Dash Moore, At Home in America: Second Generation New York Jews (NY, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Blood
    Jewish Blood This book deals with the Jewish engagement with blood: animal and human, real and metaphorical. Concentrating on the meaning or significance of blood in Judaism, the book moves this highly controversial subject away from its traditional focus, exploring how Jews themselves engage with blood and its role in Jewish identity, ritual, and culture. With contributions from leading scholars in the field, the book brings together a wide range of perspectives and covers communities in ancient Israel, Europe, and America, as well as all major eras of Jewish history: biblical, talmudic, medieval, and modern. Providing historical, religious, and cultural examples ranging from the “Blood Libel” through to the poetry of Uri Zvi Greenberg, this volume explores the deep continuities in thought and practice related to blood. Moreover, it examines the continuities and discontinuities between Jewish and Christian ideas and practices related to blood, many of which extend into the modern, contemporary period. The chapters look at not only the Jewish and Christian interaction, but the interaction between Jews and the individual national communities to which they belong, including the complex appropriation and rejection of European ideas and images undertaken by some Zionists, and then by the State of Israel. This broad-ranging and multidisciplinary work will be of interest to students of Jewish Studies, History and Religion. Mitchell B. Hart is an associate professor of Jewish history at the University of Florida in Gainesville. He is the author of The Healthy Jew: The Symbiosis of Judaism and Modern Medicine (2007) and Social Science and the Politics of Modern Jewish Identity (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Graeca Tergestina Storia E Civiltà 3 Graeca Tergestina Storia E Civiltà
    GRAECA TERGESTINA STORIA E CIVILTÀ 3 GRAECA TERGESTINA STORIA E CIVILTÀ Studi di Storia greca coordinati da Michele Faraguna Opera sottoposta a peer review secondo il protocollo UPI – University Press Italiane impaginazione Gabriella Clabot © copyright Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste 2016. Proprietà letteraria riservata. I diritti di traduzione, memorizzazione elettronica, di riproduzione e di adattamento totale e parziale di questa pubblicazione, con qualsiasi mezzo (compresi i microfilm, le fotocopie e altro) sono riservati per tutti i paesi. ISBN 978-88-8303-687-3 (print) ISBN 978-88-8303-688-0 (online) EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste via Weiss 21, 34128 Trieste http://eut.units.it https://www.facebook.com/EUTEdizioniUniversitaTrieste When West Met East The Encounter of Greece and Rome with the Jews, Egyptians, and Others Studies Presented to Ranon Katzoff in Honor of his 75th Birthday edited by David M. Schaps Uri Yiftach Daniela Dueck EUT EDIZIONI UNIVERSITÀ DI TRIESTE Ranon Katzoff Table of Contents IX Notes on Contributors Gabriel Danzig 23 Greek Philosophy and the Mishnah: XV Abbreviations On the History of Love that Does Not Depend on a Thing RANON KATZOFF Susan Weingarten 51 The Rabbi and the Emperors: Dorcades Artichokes and Cucumbers as Symbols XIX Cassovii Laudes of Status in Talmudic Literature David M. Schaps XXI Ranon Katzoff: A View of Rome from HE EWS AND HEIR WN ISTORY Jerusalem T J T O H Nachum Cohen Miriam Pucci Ben-Zeev XXVII Ranon Katzoff: A Student’s View 69 Philo on the Beginning of the Jewish Hava B. Korzakova Settlement at Rome XXIX Lo Ba-Shamaim Hi (It is not in Heaven): Michael Meerson Professor Ranon Katzoff as a Teacher 91 Illegitimate Jesus: Family Matters of Law with “Toledot Yeshu” XXXI Ranon Katzoff—A Bibliography THE LAND OF ISRAEL WHEN WEST MET EAST Werner Eck 117 Die römische Armee und der Ausbau The Editors der heißen Bäder von Hammat Gader 3 Introduction Nachum Cohen 131 A Preliminary Survey of Letters THE JEWS AND GRECO-ROMAN THOUGHT in the Judaean Desert Documents Jonathan J.
    [Show full text]
  • JO2008-V41-N08.Pdf
    1 OWARllWAS OV~RAT~ B~TFoR~~~bREos or:-f1HoUsANosoFJ~~ls1'1S~Rv1voRsTHE FUTURE WAS DARK AND UNCERTAIN. WITHOUT PARENTS AND. Ho~·~s. WHO WOULD LOOK AFTER THEIR·NEEPSfWHEREWOULD THEY·GO? THEIR STORY IS SH'EIRIS HAPLEITAH. Anoriglnal.~9cumentary forthe 350 For .compl~e··assem bly m~teri~:~;ci•'.i.~l; . Yeshivos, BaisYaakovs and Day.Schools and····.copies of documentary: . .. va partieipating in the National Asara B'Teves call305"651-4307 or fax305"651"2551;8: ,g ~:•. > Assembly Program· remembering the Docirii~ntary available inYesltivahr1lais':faakovy~1~~t .... Kedoshim. Recommended for grades 7-12. inovp .~n<IVHS formats. SchOOI .raie,$2~, R.eg,f"a~ $30. / •· · ,:,·"·>-·' ' "'< ·•.·'<·.· ..·:-·.·."'· ... ··• ...· ..• :.• ;·............... ' ... ' ... ., •.•... '.' ....... ~ •.. ' ..................... ···:· ...•.. ·" ............ ·.·. '... '.::~:-:·~:), ..·;_ '·' ·.:'·.· ................. ··~ .,,. .••.•.. ·............. ~· .... ,· ..• ·~ ..:~·~~·~ .{:.·:'.~< ·.~ ~ tl'llM 'D"lntm f.l mm "'I :rm 'fP 'I'! 'lt\\'m1P m ~ m ,.,,, ~ ..,.,,_ ft> "' ;)>n)iJll>n ,,,,.,,, ~ ,., "" """ ~ ft> ~.. ~~ ""'" \Tl>Yln>;,.;.,,,.n-nn/ ··mmi ml'Ol 'l'll'l m rc"O' ~ 't't ioirimy ,-,;, m1-o ?m!l'0'"1'p m., 'fl ~i>"",.,"". ~. ?·>""'""" """ ;µ """".1!1!10i»l 9't .. 'ri"); m tdn ., mrn6 Nll\'1 mn trl"e»n n")) 7mil'O 'i nl tMD _IU»!l m'ON\ ll'l> lj>)1' ~ m 'lwo Nllll'!t NO'!N n'11l 111')m 'I'! 1)>ll)Np m IN"" n I"""...,..,~."!'!. mnn l'IU'Ol mm vn'T? 7v U'liU'D "Wm~ rnn!Wll'I avm rnren.-?Jtt1r~ 1n> mnn!nm 1"Qtu'o ,.,,, """""" »"""" ,,,.,• ..,. "' . t ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHILDR Are the Very Survival of Kial Yisroel Rabbi
    THE UNDER· GROUND YESHIVA INGILOH It is located outside the all-new rope. Basements, old farm open 38 new schools in com· development of Giloh, because houses, barns, some with the Thousands more munities across Israel. By no space has been allocated for barest facilities, are the scene of are trying scraping together all available a yeshiva. When you enter the dedicated Rebbes and women resources, we il":l opened low building you must stoop teaching grouPs of children. to get in. four new schools. While we down. The floor is of raw con­ They are seated on benches­ And into those dilapidated facili· speak of dollars, we are dealing crete, there is one bathroom, some with the rain dripping from ties are streaming ever more with Jewish souls, with the and no heat. It is divided into 5 the ceiling, the wind blowing children every day. They throw future of our nation, with the rooms, each jam-packed with through broken windows - glances of contempt at the future of Klal Yisroel. children. The chairs and tables freezing in the winter. They are modern edifices of secularism look like they were rescued from sitting and studying our cherish· that stand partly empty. They We could do so the local junk dealer. ed heritage so that Torah should are partly empty because hun· Yet the children are there will­ continue for their future. But dreds of thousands of secularly much today. ingly. They could be sitting in a while the physical facilities are educated Israelis have made We can change the face of school near their homes, an ul­ so poor, their Torah and acade· "yerida" to other parts of the Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology After the Shoah: the Transformation of the Core Paradigm
    Irving Greenberg THEOLOGY AFTER THE SHOAH: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE CORE PARADIGM THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE CORE PARADIGM Holocaust theologies are generally classified on a grid of conceptual response. Some focus on interpretations growing out of particular movements/denominations’ positions, such as haredi, orthodox, liberal, and so on. Others emphasize specific attitudes toward God: from Rubenstein, “God is dead”; to Wiesel, God is “imprisoned”; to Green- berg, “moment faiths” in which God is alternately present and not present; to Fackenheim, God is still commanding, but we protest to God at God’s absence and failures; to Berkovits, God is hiding God’s face but is still in charge of history; to Dessler, God is punishing us for our sins.1 Sometimes the classification is presented (or developed) in more sweeping categories such as Braiterman’s, namely, the theodicy or antitheodicy approaches.2 Others have focused on the controversy over whether the Holo- caust is unique or but the latest example of a tragedy in Jewish history which challenges faith and evokes response. These are all legitimate representations, and they guide us through the now dense thicket of thinkers and thought written in response to the Shoah. Despite Rubenstein’s initial complaint that mainstream Jewish theology evaded encounters with the Holocaust because thinkers could not deal with its shattering impact, an important body of religious thought has built up, offering an impressive range of treatments of the religious implications of the Holocaust.3 Most theological responses are predicated on the ongoing ade- quacy of religious categories; they illustrate the ability to incorporate the Holocaust into classic paradigms of meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Project CHAIM Brooklyn NY (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 8, folder “Community Development - Project CHAIM Brooklyn NY (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. J...... 11 • ' r . , ''' ·~ ..... Digitized from Box 8 of ~~~.. .... .::. ;. .., The John Marsh I .. to • Files at the .. } '1 ~ Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library "" I 'i I • .., . · ~·,,'-'"· .. \ • • '• .• ·"' ·i Oldest HoU~ing ·. Areaa developed before1115 ., . J .I : . ,._ .•• .--.j-;, - ..· ··- t I ..:.e. .._ J A CII SO Ill ....,J , ~ ..- .I H (IGHf S ~ ,_.. c.-~- ()110- - ~ ~ - .........- ...... _......,. "'-• ........ .... • .. ,_ ........ ,_ q...e . ...... - -- .... - - ' ._ - - ., - c:- ........ - JA ?* .. _ . )- .......• - ~ 0.... ~ · . o-.... , •. - - L. I ......... )~ a-- / '...._ "'-• • . IH(ff'Sit(Ab "). .... ·1!'-· ... , .. :.t'v. .. : ... ........~ ... ,...,..,~ , ....c;o~~ t ...... r:. -: ...: -z:~- ·... .Cii:!~ <i...J:-,~.'4.-e!;L3~:sl~ ' ..• .... '" ..<.. ., • rr_ ·' '· • t I Agin9H USing Areas developed between 1915 and 1940 .·l .., .-... , ,. ,•. ( ,. 41....... I ~..,I I ' ~ t"l •' t·. ·' •... l~~ ~ :~ .. .... ' .. ;~: . ·1 .. ~ ' • .. J '( ' ... Detail Maps of Special Impact Area of PROJECT C H A I M ---------------------------- Legend Dashed Black Line Proposed S.I.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Perry Dane Rutgers Law School
    Curriculum Vitae Perry Dane Rutgers Law School (856) 225-6004 (work) 217 North Fifth Street (610) 896-5702 (home) Camden, New Jersey 08102 [email protected] https://law.rutgers.edu/directory/view/dane www.ssrn.com/author=48596 https://www.facebook.com/perry.dane https://twitter.com/perrydane Current Position 1995-Present Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School (previously Rutgers School of Law - Camden) Inaugural Dean’s Award for Scholarly Excellence, 2011 Rutgers-Camden Civic Engagement Fellow, 2014 Previous Positions: 1992-95 Associate Professor of Law, Rutgers School of Law - Camden 1986-92 Associate Professor of Law, Yale Law School 1983-86 Assistant Professor of Law, Yale Law School 1982-83 Law Clerk to Hon. William J. Brennan, Jr., Associate Justice, United States Supreme Court 1981-82 Law Clerk to Hon. David L. Bazelon, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 1980 Summer Associate, Wilmer & Pickering (now WilmerHale), Washington, D.C. 1979 Summer Associate, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City 2 Fellowships: 2010-11 Full-Time Resident Fellow, Tikvah Center for Law and Jewish Civilization, New York University School of Law 2000-2001 Faculty Fellow, Center for the Critical Analysis of Contemporary Culture, Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Program on “Secularism” Visitorships and Adjunctships: 2010-11 Adjunct Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, teaching a seminar on “Religion, Law, and Morality” and supervising J.D. directed research papers and an LL.M. thesis. Jan. 2008 Visiting Professor of Law, University of Western Ontario Faculty of Law, teaching an intensive “January Term” course on “Religion and the State in Cross-National Perspective.” Sum.
    [Show full text]