DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 4 Aerial Surveys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 4 Aerial Surveys Survey Manual Chapter 4 Aerial Surveys Colorado Department of Transportation December 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 4 – Aerial Surveys 4.1 General ............................................................................................................................................. 4 4.1.1 Acronyms found in this Chapter ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.2 Purpose of this Chapter .............................................................................................................. 5 4.1.3 Aerial Surveys ............................................................................................................................ 5 4.1.4 Aerial Photogrammetry .............................................................................................................. 5 4.1.5 Photogrammetric Advantages / Disadvantages .......................................................................... 6 4.1.6 Aerial LiDAR ............................................................................................................................. 6 4.1.7 LiDAR Advantages / Disadvantages .......................................................................................... 7 4.1.8 Pre-survey Conference – Aerial Survey ..................................................................................... 9 4.2 Ground Control for Aerial Surveys ............................................................................................ 10 4.2.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.2 Ground Control Targeting Requirements ................................................................................. 10 4.2.3 Photogrammetry ....................................................................................................................... 11 4.2.4 Aerial LiDAR ........................................................................................................................... 12 4.2.5 Equipment Checking and Calibration ...................................................................................... 12 4.2.6 Permission to Enter Property Form 730a ................................................................................. 12 4.2.7 Underground Utility Locates Prior to Installing Photo Control Monumentation .................... 13 4.2.8 Aerial Ground Control Monumentation ................................................................................... 13 4.2.9 Center Point Control ................................................................................................................. 13 4.2.10 Wing Point Control .................................................................................................................. 14 4.2.11 Aerial Control Targets (Paneling) ............................................................................................ 14 4.2.11.1 Photogrammetry ............................................................................................................................................ 14 4.2.11.2 LiDAR ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.12 Aerial Control Target Design & Material ................................................................................ 15 4.2.13 Removal of Aerial Control Target Material ............................................................................. 16 4.3 Aerial Control Horizontal Survey ............................................................................................... 17 4.3.1 Aerial Control Horizontal Survey Datum ................................................................................ 17 4.3.2 Minimum Aerial Control Horizontal Survey Accuracy Tolerance .......................................... 17 4.3.3 GPS Photo Control Horizontal Survey Methods...................................................................... 17 4.3.4 Conventional Aerial Control Horizontal Survey Methods ....................................................... 18 4.4 Aerial Control Vertical Survey .................................................................................................... 19 4.4.1 Photo Control Vertical Survey Datum (NAVD 88) ................................................................. 19 4.4.2 Minimum Aerial Control Vertical Accuracy Tolerance .......................................................... 19 4.4.3 GPS Aerial Control Vertical Survey Methods ......................................................................... 19 4.4.4 Conventional Aerial Control Vertical Survey Methods ........................................................... 19 4.5 Aerial Control Survey Report ...................................................................................................... 20 4.5.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 20 4.5.2 Aerial Control Survey Report .................................................................................................. 20 4.6 Aerial Topo Mapping Standards ................................................................................................. 22 4.6.1 CDOT CADD Standards .......................................................................................................... 22 4.6.2 MicroStation/InRoads Configurations for Consultants ............................................................ 22 4.6.3 MicroStation Level Structure ................................................................................................... 22 4.6.4 Aerial Survey – Photogrammetric Feature Identification ........................................................ 22 CDOT Survey Manual 2 December 30, 2015 4.6.5 Post Aerial or Pre-Aerial TMOSS Supplemental Surveys ....................................................... 22 4.6.6 Minimum Horizontal and Vertical Accuracy Tolerance for TMOSS Supplemental Survey .. 23 4.7 Aerial Mapping Tolerances .......................................................................................................... 24 4.7.1 Aerial Mapping Horizontal Accuracy Tolerance ..................................................................... 24 4.7.1.1 Orthophotography .............................................................................................................................................. 24 4.7.2 Aerial Mapping Vertical Accuracy Tolerance ......................................................................... 25 4.7.3 Existing Constructed Transportation Corridor Template ......................................................... 25 4.7.4 Obscured Areas ......................................................................................................................... 25 Vertical Accuracy Testing - ...................................................................................................... 25 4.7.5 Method of Verifying Accuracy Tolerance ................................................................................ 25 4.7.5.1 Photogrammetry ................................................................................................................................................ 25 4.7.5.2 Aerial LiDAR .................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.8 Aerial Surveys and Photogrammetry Specifications ................................................................. 27 4.8.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 27 4.8.2 American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing (ASPRS) .................................... 27 4.8.3 Project Location and Limits ..................................................................................................... 27 4.8.4 Aerial Survey Field Conditions ................................................................................................ 28 4.8.5 Flight Plan ................................................................................................................................ 28 4.8.6 Aircraft ..................................................................................................................................... 29 4.8.7 Aerial Data Acquisition ............................................................................................................ 29 4.8.8 Raw Data .................................................................................................................................. 29 4.8.8.1 Imagery Quality ................................................................................................................................................. 29 4.8.8.2 Film Labeling ..................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.8.8.3 Aerial Triangulation ........................................................................................................................................... 30 4.8.8.4 Digital Image Naming Convention .................................................................................................................... 31 4.8.8.5 Aerial LiDAR - General ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REMOTE SENSING a Bibliography of Cultural Resource Studies
    REMOTE SENSING A Bibliography of Cultural Resource Studies Supplement No. 0 REMOTE SENSING Aerial Anthropological Perspectives: A Bibliography of Remote Sensing in Cultural Resource Studies Thomas R. Lyons Robert K. Hitchcock Wirth H. Wills Supplement No. 3 to Remote Sensing: A Handbook for Archeologists and Cultural Resource Managers Series Editor: Thomas R. Lyons Cultural Resources Management National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 1980 Acknowledgments This bibliography on remote sensing in cultural Numerous individuals have aided us. We es­ resource studies has been compiled over a period pecially wish to acknowledge the aid of Rosemary of about five years of research at the Remote Sen­ Ames, Marita Brooks, Galen Brown, Dwight Dra- sing Division, Southwest Cultural Resources Cen­ ger, James Ebert, George Gumerman, James ter, National Park Service. We have been aided Judge, Stephanie Klausner, Robert Lister, Joan by numerous government agencies in the course Mathien, Stanley Morain and Gretchen Obenauf. of this work, including the Department of the In­ Douglas Scovill, Chief Anthropologist of the Na­ terior, National Park Service, the U.S. Geological tional Park Service has also encouraged and sup­ Survey EROS Program, and the National Aero­ ported us in the pursuit of new research directions. nautics and Space Administration (NASA). Fi­ Christina Allen aided immeasurably in the com­ nancial support has been provided by these pilation of this bibliography, not only in procuring agencies as well as by the National Geographic references (especially those dealing with under­ Society (Grant No. 1177). The Department of An­ water remote sensing), but also in proofreading the thropology, University of New Mexico, and the entire manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Estimates from Satellite Imagery
    l'RONTlSPIECE. Unmagnified high-altitude image ot tlremerton, wasmngwn \scale 1: 135,000). Original image recorded on false-color-infrared reversal film. CHARLES E. OGROSKY University ofWashington Seattle, WA 98195 Population Estimates from Satellite Imagery A high degree of association between urban area population and four variables representing urban size and relative dominance, as measured on high-altitude satellite imagery, indicated that such imagery may be useful for estimating urban population. (Abstract on next page) INTRODUCTION completely survey the population of the United States and its characteristics. Such UMERous examples of the useof conven­ methods of data collection have been criti­ N tional aerial photographs in analyzing cized as being overly costly and time con­ urban problems have been reported. The suming, given the accuracy of the resultant purpose of this study was to investigate the data. Use ofaerial imagery for collecting cer­ suitability of high-altitude satellite imagery tain types of census information has been for estimation of regional urban population. suggested as a procedure which can success­ fully supplement existing techniques.! Al­ CENSUS METHODS though much of the data presently collected Both field and mail questionnaire enumer­ by traditional methods would not be directly ation methods are frequently employed to obtainable from remotely sensed images, 707 708 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING, 1975 ABSTRACT: The suitability ofmedium ground resolution, high altitude satellite imagery as a data source for intercensal population esti­ mates was evaluated. Four variables representing urban size and relative dominance were measured directly from unmagnified high­ altitude, color-infrared transparencies for each of18 urban test sites in the Puget Sound region.
    [Show full text]
  • AERIAL SURVEYS in HIGHWAY LOCATION William T
    AERIAL SURVEYS IN HIGHWAY LOCATION William T. Pryor, Highway Engineer Department of Design, Public Roads Administration HORTLY after the first World War highway engineers became interested in S the use of aerial photographs in highway focation. In 1924 aerial photo­ graJ?hs and mosaics were u~ed in the location of parkways in the S~te of New York and during the same year photogrammetric methods of large scale mapping became available. Until World War II, however, general a~ceptanceof photogrammetry as an aid in the highway engineering field has been relatively slow. We now have the benefit of experience by a number of State highway depart­ ments in the use of aerial phorographs and photogrammetric methods of map­ ping. It will be the purpose of this article to summarize the main points of what has been learned regarding the various methods of aerial surveying and types of photogrammetric equipment that now appear to be best adapted fOl:,use in the successive stages of highway location. STAGES OF HIGHWAY LOCATION In regions not adequately mapped small-scale maps must be prepared. On such regional maps a system of highways can be planned, with each class of high­ way including National and State systems, secondary and land service roads rep­ resented. Terminal and major intermediate control points can be selected on the basis of this classification. Once these controls have been selected, highway loca­ tion may be carried out in the consecilt'ive stages shown in Figure 1. In referring to this figure particular attention is directed to the relationship between map scales and width of coverage in each of the location stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Accuracy of Underwater Photogrammetry for Archaeology
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Assessing the Accuracy of Underwater Photogrammetry for Archaeology: A Comparison of Structure from Motion Photogrammetry and Real Time Kinematic Survey at the East Key Construction Wreck Anne E. Wright 1,* , David L. Conlin 1 and Steven M. Shope 2 1 National Park Service Submerged Resources Center, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA; [email protected] 2 Sandia Research Corporation, Mesa, AZ 85207, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 September 2020; Accepted: 19 October 2020; Published: 28 October 2020 Abstract: The National Park Service (NPS) Submerged Resources Center (SRC) documented the East Key Construction Wreck in Dry Tortugas National Park using Structure from Motion photogrammetry, traditional archaeological hand mapping, and real time kinematic GPS (Global Positioning System) survey to test the accuracy of and establish a baseline “worst case scenario” for 3D models created with NPS SRC’s tri-camera photogrammetry system, SeaArray. The data sets were compared using statistical analysis to determine accuracy and precision. Additionally, the team evaluated the amount of time and resources necessary to produce an acceptably accurate photogrammetry model that can be used for a variety of archaeological functions, including site monitoring and interpretation. Through statistical analysis, the team determined that, in the worst case scenario, in its current iteration, photogrammetry models created with SeaArray have a margin of error of 5.29 cm at a site over 84 m in length and 65 m in width. This paper discusses the design of the survey, acquisition and processing of data, analysis, issues encountered, and plans to improve the accuracy of the SeaArray photogrammetry system.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Photogrammetry and Terrestrial (Close Range) Photogrammetry
    Introduction Photogrammetry is a surveying and mapping technique which can be used in various applications. There are many uses of Photogrammetry in the surveying industry such as topographic mapping, site planning, earthwork volumes, production of digital elevation models (DEM) and orthphotography maps. It is also useful in a vast selection of industries such as architecture, manufacturing, police investigation, and even plastic surgery. The word “photogrammetry” is composed of the words “photo” and “meter” which means measurements from photographs. The classical definition of photogrammetry is: The art, science and technology of obtaining reliable information about physical objects and the environment, through processes of recording, measuring, and interpreting images on photographs. (www.state.nj.us/transportation/eng/documents/survey/Chapter7.shtm) Photogrammetry is a skilled profession for the reason that obtaining reliable measurements requires certain skills, techniques and judgments to be made by the Photogrammetrist and experience is an advantage. It is a science and technology because it takes information from an image and transforms this data into meaningful results. Types of Photogrammetry There are two types of Photogrammetry, Aerial Photogrammetry and Terrestrial (Close Range) Photogrammetry. Aerial digital photogrammetry, often used in topographical mapping, begins with digital photographs or video taken from a camera mounted on the bottom of an airplane. The plane often flies over the area in a meandering flight path so it can take overlapping photographs or video of the entire area to get complete coverage. Close-range, or terrestrial, digital photogrammetry often uses photographs taken from close proximity by hand held cameras or those mounted to a tripod.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomatic Assessment
    WINTER 2017/18 GEOMATIC ASSESSMENT NC AWWA-WEA 3725 National Drive, Suite 217 •2 2018018 MembershipMembership DDirectoryirectory & Buyers’Buyers’ GuideGuide Raleigh, NC 27612 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED • 9 97th7th AAnnualnnual CConferenceonference RRecapecap The official publication of the North Carolina Section of the American Water Works Association (NC AWWA) & the North Carolina Member Association of the Water Environment Federation (NC WEA) GEOMATIC ASSESSMENT How Unmanned Aerial Systems Are Changing the Surveying Industry: Comparing Real-World Accuracy and Cost with Traditional Survey Technologies By Christian Stallings, CP, Research & Development Manager, McKim & Creed, Inc. s a drone the best way to collect above ground to collect data at an developer. These types of surveys are data for your project? Unmanned accuracy of 5-cm root-mean square-error typically conducted using fixed-wing I aerial systems (UAS), aka drones, are (RMSE) or better. aerial photogrammetry, aerial lidar, certainly among the newest geomatics But is UAS right for every surveying and/or conventional ground surveying. technologies in the industry. UAS offers situation? In this article we describe three safe, accurate, cost-effective data case studies in which UAS technology UAS for Landfill Survey collection in areas that are inaccessible was compared with conventional To test the efficacy of using UAS technol- or too costly for conventional surveying surveying methods. We focused on ogy for volumetric surveys, McKim & Creed methods. Licensed and insured UAS three applications: a landfill volumetric teamed with landfill engineers Garrett pilots can legally deploy airframes into survey, a beach monitoring survey, and & Moore, Inc. to survey a 60-acre land FAA-controlled airspace up to 400 feet an elevation verification for a private clearing and inert debris landfill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Positioning System As a Complementary Tool for Remote Sensing and Other Applications
    The Global Positioning System as a Complementary Tool for Remote Sensing and other Applications Glen Gibbons GPS World 859 Willamette Street, P. O. Box 10460, Eugene, OR 97440-0460 ARLY IN AUGUST 1990, U.S. troops pouring into Saudi Arabia a limited amount of radio spectrum can support an unlimited Eas part of the Desert Shield build-up faced a critical chal­ number of users. Recent market studies have projected a world­ lenge: how to deploy men and equipment quickly and safely wide market for military and commercial GPS equipment reach­ across the treacherous sands of a trackless desert. In the days ing between $4 and $6 billion a year by the mid-1990s. following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, maps of the area were Navigation, vehicle tracking, and geodetic surveying make more than a quarter-century old and of questionable accuracy. up the largest categories of civil GPS applications today, al­ If advance elements of the 82nd Airborne Division were to suc­ though more esoteric uses are rapidly emerging, such as ani­ cessfully confront the military threat and come to the aid of mal-habitat research, detecting structural deformation in dams Iraqi-occupied Kuwait, they would need accurate maps imme­ and oil platforms, resource management, and monitoring en­ diately. vironmental pollution and natural hazards such as volcanoes Traditional cartographic techniques require considerable time and earthquakes. In remote sensing, GPS has been used for to produce usable maps - too much time for this life-or-death several years to quickly survey ground control points for pho­ situation. So, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporations DEPARTMENT
    ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Corporations DEPARTMENT Kucera International, Inc. to become one of the country’s largest full-service mapping 38133 Western Parkway firms. Headquartered in Ebensburg, PA, the Mapping Sci- Willoughby, OH 44094-5789 ences Division is staffed with 100 highly skilled professionals 216-975-4230; 216-975-4238 (fax) providing the following services: l Aerial Photography - We maintain two aircraft and two Kucera International Inc. is a professional corporation that aerial cameras for photography acquisition. Aircraft performs photogrammetric, surveying, engineering, cadastral, and cameras are operated by our own highly experi- and computer services for GIS, facility management, and re- enced crews. lated programs. l Surveying - We have adapted state-of-the-art technolo- Kucera’s capabilities and experience span all stages and gies such as GPS, electronic total stations and electronic elements of mapping program evolution. For program start-up field books. Our services range from property boundary and management, Kucera provides consulting, feasibility surveys to horizontal and vertical control/airborne GPS. studies, specifications, system recommendations, and pilot l Photo Lab - We maintain a full-service photographic projects. For program development, Kucera performs hard- laboratory that performs film developing, contact and ware/software acquisition, GIS data conversion, and data diapositive printing, enlargements and photo mosaics. collection/generation in the form of aerial photography, GPS l Analytical Triangulation
    [Show full text]
  • Photogrammetry and 3D Laser Scanning As Spatial Data Capture Techniques for a National Craniofacial Database
    The Photogrammetric Record 20(109): 48–68 (March 2005) PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND 3D LASER SCANNING AS SPATIAL DATA CAPTURE TECHNIQUES FOR A NATIONAL CRANIOFACIAL DATABASE Zulkepli Majid ([email protected]) Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Albert K. Chong ([email protected]) University of Otago, New Zealand Anuar Ahmad ([email protected]) Halim Setan ([email protected]) Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Abdul Rani Samsudin ([email protected]) Universiti Sains Malaysia Abstract Photogrammetry is a non-contact, high-accuracy, practical and cost-effective technique for a large number of medical applications. Lately, three-dimensional (3D) laser scanning and digital imaging technology have raised the importance of digital photogrammetry technology to a new height in craniofacial mapping. Under the support of the Eighth Malaysian Development Plan, the Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment (MOSTE) Malaysia allocated a grant to establish procedures for the development of a national craniofacial spatial database to assist the medical profession to provide better health services to the public. To populate the database with normal and abnormal (malformation, diseased and trauma and burn victims) craniofacial information, it is necessary to evaluate the technology needed to capture the essential data of craniofacial features. The paper provides a discussion on the basic features of the spatial data and the data capture techniques. Both are needed for the establishment of a national spatial craniofacial database. The discussion includes a brief review of the current status of two selected high-accuracy craniofacial spatial data capture techniques, namely, digital photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning. The paper highlights a system which has been developed for a Malaysian craniofacial mapping project.
    [Show full text]
  • ICSM Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data
    ICSM Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data VERSION 1.0 August 12, 2008 ICSM Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data Version 1.0. Preface The purpose of this document is to provide investors, providers and users of elevation data with guidelines and recommendations for acquiring elevation data depicting the earth’s surface based on current best practice. The Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data were prepared by the Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping Elevation Working Group under the auspices of the National Elevation Data Framework (NEDF) initiative currently under development. The Working Group involves experts from State and Federal mapping agencies, industry and academia. The purpose of the NEDF initiative is to develop a collaborative framework that can be used to increase the quality of elevation data and derived products such as digital elevation models (DEMs) describing Australia’s landform and seabed. The aim is to optimise investment in existing and future data collections and provide access to a wide range of digital elevation data and derived products to those who need them. The guidelines represent a first cut in the preparation of ‘best practice’ guidelines for Australia and have been prepared as an outcome of a review of existing available material from around Australia and selected countries. These guidelines are considered a living document. If you have any questions or comments on the guidelines please email [email protected]. For further information on the NEDF or these guidelines please visit the ANZLIC site at http://www.anzlic.org.au/nedf.html and the ICSM site at http://www.icsm.gov.au/icsm/elevation/index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of the Digital Elevation Model for Orthophoto Cr Production
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B3, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic PREPARATION OF THE DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL FOR ORTHOPHOTO CR PRODUCTION Z. Švec a, K. Pavelkaa a Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Thákurova 7, Prague 6, 166 29, Czech Republic - [email protected] Commission III, WG III/1 KEY WORDS: Airborne Laser Scanning, Digital Elevation Model, Orthorectification, Surface Modelling, True Orthophoto ABSTRACT: The Orthophoto CR is produced in co-operation with the Land Survey Office and the Military Geographical and Hydrometeorological Office. The product serves to ensure a defence of the state, integrated crisis management, civilian tasks in support of the state administration and the local self-government of the Czech Republic as well. It covers the whole area of the Republic and for ensuring its up-to-datedness is reproduced in the biennial period. As the project is countrywide, it keeps the project within the same parameters in urban and rural areas as well. Due to economic reasons it can´t be produced as a true ortophoto because it requires large side and forward overlaps of the aerial photographs and a preparation of the digital surface model instead of the digital terrain model. Use of DTM without some objects of DSM for orthogonalization purposes cause undesirable image deformations in the Orthophoto. There are a few data sets available for forming a suitable elevation model. The principal source should represent DTMs made from data acquired by the airborne laser scanning of the entire area of the Czech Republic that was carried out in the years 2009-2013, the DMR4G in the grid form and the DMR5G in TIN form respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Photogrammetric and Computer Vision Techniques in Shake Table Testing
    13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 3458 APPLICATIONS OF PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AND COMPUTER VISION TECHNIQUES IN SHAKE TABLE TESTING J.-A. BERALDIN1, C. LATOUCHE1, S.F. EL-HAKIM1, A. FILIATRAULT2 SUMMARY The paper focuses on the use of heterogeneous visual data sources in order to support the analysis of three-dimensional dynamic movement of a flexible structure subjected to an earthquake ground motion during a shake table experiment. During a shake table experiment, a great amount of data is gathered including visual recordings. In most experiments, visual information is taken without any specific analysis purpose: amateur’s pictures, video from a local TV station, analog videotapes. In fact, those sources might be meaningful and could be used for subsequent spatial analysis. The use of photogrammetric techniques is illustrated in the paper by performing a post-experiment analysis on analog videotapes that were recorded during a shake table testing of a full-scale woodframe house. INTRODUCTION This paper brings to the experimental earthquake engineering community new insights from the photogrammetric and computer vision fields. The paper focuses on the use of heterogeneous visual data sources in order to support the analysis of three-dimensional dynamic movement of a rigid or flexible structure subjected to an earthquake ground motion during a shake table experiment. During a shake table experiment, a great amount of data is gathered including visual recordings. In most experiments, visual information like those from amateur’s pictures, video from local TV stations, videotapes (digital or analog) is taken without any specific concern for the extraction of metric data in future analyses.
    [Show full text]