DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Leg Ornamentation in Male Wolf Spiders, with the Description of a New Species from Australia, Artoria Schizocoides (Araneae, Lycosidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of Leg Ornamentation in Male Wolf Spiders, with the Description of a New Species from Australia, Artoria Schizocoides (Araneae, Lycosidae) University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Eileen Hebets Publications Papers in the Biological Sciences January 2007 A Review of Leg Ornamentation in Male Wolf Spiders, with the Description of a New Species from Australia, Artoria schizocoides (Araneae, Lycosidae) Volker W. Framenau Western Australian Museum Eileen Hebets University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscihebets Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons Framenau, Volker W. and Hebets, Eileen, "A Review of Leg Ornamentation in Male Wolf Spiders, with the Description of a New Species from Australia, Artoria schizocoides (Araneae, Lycosidae)" (2007). Eileen Hebets Publications. 9. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscihebets/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eileen Hebets Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2007. The Journal of Arachnology 35:89–101 A REVIEW OF LEG ORNAMENTATION IN MALE WOLF SPIDERS, WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM AUSTRALIA, ARTORIA SCHIZOCOIDES (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) Volker W. Framenau: Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Eileen A. Hebets: School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, 348 Manter Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 USA. ABSTRACT. Morphological modifications of the first pair of legs in addition to widespread color var- iations of these legs among males of closely related species have been reported in a variety of spiders. Here, the evidence for sexual dimorphism in male foreleg morphology within wolf spiders (family Ly- cosidae) is reviewed and shown to occur in a number of species belonging to at least seven genera in five subfamilies: Alopecosa, Hogna, Schizocosa (all Lycosinae) Pirata (Piratinae), Evippa, (Evippinae), Par- dosa (Pardosinae) and Artoria (Artoriinae). These modifications, often in combination with distinct dark pigmentation, can be divided into three major groups: leg elongation, segment swelling and exaggerated setation (‘‘brushes’’). The latter two occur mainly on the tibial segment of the first leg. The function of these foreleg modifications has been studied most extensively in the genus Schizocosa. Since the courtship displays of all male Schizocosa incorporate a seismic component, foreleg ornamentation (namely pigmen- tation and associated ‘‘brushes’’) composes only one part of a multimodal courtship display. The function of this foreleg ornamentation appears to vary across closely related Schizocosa species and in some instances involves an interaction with the seismic signaling component. In most instances it appears to play a role in female mate choice and/or mate choice learning. In addition to reviewing lycosid foreleg modifications, we describe a new species of wolf spider, Artoria schizocoides from southwestern Western Australia that possesses sexually dimorphic modifications of the tibia of the first leg. Unique within the Artoriinae, males of this species carry spatulate setae on the ventral side of the tibia of the first leg that differ morphologically from other leg modifications in wolf spiders. Keywords: Courtship display, sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, secondary sexual traits Two main evolutionary processes that work rect aggressive encounters with members of independently or in combination are thought the same sex (generally males; intrasexual se- to explain sexual dimorphism or the morpho- lection), or used by members of the opposite logical differences between males and fe- sex to assess mate quality (generally females; males. One category relates morphological intersexual selection) (Darwin 1871; Anders- differences between males and females to a son 1994). reduction in intersexual competition for re- In wolf spiders, sexual dimorphism is evi- sources (ecological niche partitioning) (Shine dent in a multitude of forms and most differ- 1989; Fairbairn 1997). The second explains ences between males and females are attrib- sexual dimorphism by differences between the uted to differences in reproductive roles. With sexes in the relationship between a particular a few exceptions (e.g., Donacosa merlini Al- trait and reproductive fitness (sexual selection derweireldt & Jocque´ 1991) females are larger or differences in reproductive roles) (e.g., Se- than males. In most ground dwelling species, lander 1972; Hedrick & Temeles 1989; Reyn- these size differences are mainly explained by olds & Harvey 1994). Sexual selection arises a fecundity advantage of larger females (Pren- through competition between members of one ter et al. 1997, 1998, 1999). Sexual dimor- sex for reproduction with the other sex. Here, phism also exists with respect to differences dimorphic structures may either be used in di- in trophic morphology (i.e., the sizes of che- 89 90 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY licerae and venom glands); these differences ter two of which are most prevalent on the have been ascribed to the increased impor- tibial segment (Table 1). tance of foraging for females rather than an Elongation.—An elongation of the front avoidance of intersexual competition for food pair of legs can be either subtle (e.g., Alope- (Walker & Rypstra 2001, 2002). Across many cosa cuneata (Clerck 1757) (Kronestedt 1990) wolf spider species, especially those with sed- or very conspicuous (e.g., Artoria flavimana entary females, males also possess compara- Simon 1909) (Framenau 2002). For example, tively longer legs than females. This leg di- in the Palaearctic Alopecosa cuneata, the ratio morphism is thought to have evolved through of the length of tibia I to tibia IV is higher an advantage of more mobile males to en- than in a related species of similar size, A. counter females occupying permanent bur- pulverulenta (Clerck 1758) (Kronestedt 1990). rows (Framenau 2005a). While the above This elongation of the forelegs has been re- forms of dimorphism refer mainly to differ- lated to male courtship displays (Kronestedt ences in body shape or size, dimorphic color 1990), as there is direct contact between the patterns to augment body size and condition forelegs of a male and female A. cuneata in have also been argued to play an important the form of the female grasping the swollen role in the mating behavior of wolf spiders tibial segment of the male with her chelicerae (Moya-Laran˜o et al. 2003). (Kronestedt 1990, for more detail see below). Dimorphic patterns of foreleg pigmentation Male Alopecosa taeniata (C. L. Koch 1835) appear to be one of the most widespread and also have longer legs as compared to the conspicuous form of sexual dimorphism closely related A. aculeata (Clerck 1758) among wolf spiders (Framenau, pers. obs.) (Kronestedt 1990). In this case however, the and these differences in foreleg ornamentation elongation is not restricted to the forelegs and appear to be driven mostly by sexual selec- increased species-specific mobility of males tion. Male foreleg ornamentation commonly during courtship is suggested to explain this involves extremely dark pigmentation or very pattern (Kronestedt 1990), although there is distinct light coloration on individual foreleg currently no experimental evidence to support segments or covering the entire front pair of this hypothesis. legs. In some species, males possess an ex- In almost all wolf spiders the fourth pair of aggerated form of foreleg ornamentation in- legs is the longest, followed by leg I, and then volving morphological modifications of the II and III, or less commonly III and II (ex- pressed in the ‘‘leg formula’’: IV Ͼ I Ͼ II Ͼ first pair of legs. These morphological modi- Ͼ Ͼ Ͼ fications occur in a variety of forms in most III or IV I III II). However, in males of the Australian A. flavimana mentioned currently recognized subfamilies of wolf spi- above, the front pair of legs is extremely elon- ders. Our study aims to review the evidence gated and much longer than the fourth pair of for sexual foreleg dimorphism within the spi- legs. In females of A. flavimana the fourth leg der family Lycosidae by compiling morpho- is the longest, similar to both sexes of all other logical information from the taxonomic liter- species in this genus (Framenau 2002, 2004, ature. In addition, we describe a species with 2005b, also this study). The elongation is not a novel form of male tibial ornamentation— restricted to a single segment as in A. cuneata ventral spatulate modified setae. This species, but concerns all segments. The behavioral Artoria schizocoides n. sp., belongs to the mating sequence of A. flavimana is not known Australasian/Pacific subfamily Artoriinae and and therefore the function of this morpholog- is the only species within this subfamily ical modification remains unclear. In male known to the authors with excessive setation orb-weaving spiders, an elongation of the first on the first pair of legs. pair of legs has been argued to be beneficial to avoid sexual cannibalism (Elgar et al. MORPHOLOGICAL MODIFICATIONS IN 1990). THE FIRST LEG OF WOLF SPIDERS Swelling.—The tibia of the first leg of male Morphological modifications of the first A. cuneata is not only elongated (see above) pair of legs in male wolf spiders belong to but also distinctly swollen (Fig. 1). The swol- three major categories: (1) elongation,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TFG Lucas Fernandez Miriam.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales Trabajo Fin de Grado Revisión bibliográfica de los Licósidos (Araneidae, Lycosidae) presentes en el sureste de la península ibérica Ciencias Experimentales Alumno: Miriam Lucas Fernández Facultad de Julio, 2020 UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS EXPERIMENTALES GRADO EN BIOLOGÍA Trabajo Fin de Grado Revisión bibliográfica de los Licósidos (Araneidae, Lycosidae) presentes en el sureste de la península ibérica Miriam Lucas Fernández Julio, 2020 1 RESUMEN ………………………………………………………………………………3 2 INTRODUCCIÓN ................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Distribución y diversidad de las arañas ......................................................... 4 2.2 Morfología biológica ...................................................................................... 5 2.3 Biología reproductiva del orden Araneae ...................................................... 7 3 OBJETIVOS ........................................................................................................ 8 4 MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS ............................................................................... 9 5 FAMILIA LYCOSIDAE: Perspectiva mundial e ibérica ....................................... 9 5.1 Taxonomía .................................................................................................. 10 5.2 Identificación ............................................................................................... 12 5.3 Hábitat ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 22 3 259 263 Mikhailov Alopecosa.P65
    Arthropoda Selecta 22(3): 259263 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2013 Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885: a historical account (Aranei: Lycosidae) Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 è Alopecosa Simon, 1885: èñòîðè÷åñêèé îáçîð (Aranei: Lycosidae) K.G. Mikhailov Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Zoological Museum MGU, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, Moscow 125009 Russia. Çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé ÌÃÓ, óë. Áîëüøàÿ Íèêèòñêàÿ, 6, Ìîñêâà 125009 Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: Tarentula, Alopecosa, nomenclature, synonymy, spiders, Lycosidae. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Tarentula, Alopecosa, íîìåíêëàòóðà, ñèíîíèìèÿ, ïàóêè, Lycosidae. ABSTRACT. History of Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 genus Lycosa to include the following 11 species (the and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 is reviewed. Validity of current species assignments follow the catalogues by Alopecosa Simon, 1885 is supported. Reimoser [1919], Roewer [1954a], and, especially, Bonnet [1955, 1957, 1959]): ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Äàí îáçîð èñòîðèè ðîäîâûõ íàçâà- Lycosa Fabrilis [= Alopecosa fabrilis (Clerck, 1758)], íèé Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 è Alopecosa Simon, L. trabalis [= Alopecosa inquilina (Clerck, 1758), male, 1885. Îáîñíîâàíà âàëèäíîñòü íàçâàíèÿ Alopecosa and A. trabalis (Clerck, 1758), female], Simon, 1885. L. vorax?, male [= either Alopecosa trabalis or A. trabalis and A. pulverulenta (Clerck, 1758), according Introduction to different sources], L. nivalis male [= Alopecosa aculeata (Clerck, 1758)], The nomenclatorial problems concerning the ge- L. barbipes [sp.n.] [= Alopecosa barbipes Sundevall, neric names Tarantula Fabricius, 1793, Tarentula Sun- 1833, = A. accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], devall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 have been L. cruciata female [sp.n.] [= Alopecosa barbipes Sun- discussed in the arachnological literature at least twice devall, 1833, = A. accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], [Charitonov, 1931; Bonnet, 1951]. However, the arach- L. pulverulenta [= Alopecosa pulverulenta], nological community seems to have overlooked or ne- L.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
    Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA Barcodes And
    Blagoev et al. BMC Ecology 2013, 13:44 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/13/44 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA barcodes and morphology reveal high species diversity and new Canadian records Gergin A Blagoev1*, Nadya I Nikolova1, Crystal N Sobel1, Paul DN Hebert1,2 and Sarah J Adamowicz1,2 Abstract Background: Arctic ecosystems, especially those near transition zones, are expected to be strongly impacted by climate change. Because it is positioned on the ecotone between tundra and boreal forest, the Churchill area is a strategic locality for the analysis of shifts in faunal composition. This fact has motivated the effort to develop a comprehensive biodiversity inventory for the Churchill region by coupling DNA barcoding with morphological studies. The present study represents one element of this effort; it focuses on analysis of the spider fauna at Churchill. Results: 198 species were detected among 2704 spiders analyzed, tripling the count for the Churchill region. Estimates of overall diversity suggest that another 10–20 species await detection. Most species displayed little intraspecific sequence variation (maximum <1%) in the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, but four species showed considerably higher values (maximum = 4.1-6.2%), suggesting cryptic species. All recognized species possessed a distinct haplotype array at COI with nearest-neighbour interspecific distances averaging 8.57%. Three species new to Canada were detected: Robertus lyrifer (Theridiidae), Baryphyma trifrons (Linyphiidae), and Satilatlas monticola (Linyphiidae). The first two species may represent human-mediated introductions linked to the port in Churchill, but the other species represents a range extension from the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad De Artrópodos En España 235
    DiversiDaD De artrópoDos en españa 235 Diversidad de Artrópodos en España Diversity of Arthropods in Spain Vicente M. Ortuño 1 y Francisco David Martínez-Pérez 1 1) Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física. Facultad de Biología. Universidad de Alcalá. E-28871. Alcalá de Henares (Madrid, Spain). e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Palabras clave: Arthropoda, España, biodiversidad, fauna invasora, endemismo. Key words: Arthropoda, Spain, biodiversity, invasive fauna, endemic fauna. resumen Se realiza una aproximación al conocimiento global de los Arthropoda en España, para lo que se abordan dos aspectos. En primer lugar, las peculiaridades geográficas e históricas que condicionan el paisaje, y en segundo lugar, las características anatómicas y fisiológicas más relevantes que convierten a este Filo en un grupo taxonómico de gran éxito evolutivo. Seguidamente se ofrecen datos concretos sobre la diversidad de los Arthropoda en España, y para ello se hace ordenando la información en tres bloques temáticos (biodiversidad, fauna invasora y endemismos). El primer bloque, “biodiversidad”, se vale de cuatro tablas (una por cada subfilo) que aportan información sobre el número de especies, por grupos taxonómicos basales (clase, subclase u orden) y por diferentes regiones geográficas y geopolíticas (España, -disociando ámbito íbero-balear y Canarias-, Italia, Europa y mundo). Además, en el texto se exponen algunas características generales (morfológicas y/o etológicas) que singularizan a cada grupo de Arthropoda. Del mismo modo, se citan las especies, o los géneros, relevantes y más conspicuos de la fauna española. El segundo bloque, “fauna invasora”, expone información acerca de especies alóctonas que han conseguido expandirse ampliamente por el territorio español o, en otros casos, especies que han alcanzado relevancia mediática por algún aspecto concreto de su biología.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix P SRE and Targeted Invertebrate Survey
    SRE and targeted invertebrate survey Phoenix Environmental Sciences, March 2010. Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project. Unpublished report prepared for South Metro Connect, Perth, WA. ...........................................................................Appendix P SRE and targeted invertebrate survey ........................................................................... Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project Prepared for South Metro Connect Final Report March 2010 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1 Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project South Metro Connect Final Report Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project Prepared for South Metro Connect Final Report Authors: Volker W. Framenau and Conor O’Neill Reviewers: Melanie White and Karen Crews Date: 8 March 2011 Submitted to: Jamie Shaw and Peter Magaro (South Metro Connect) © 2011 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd The information contained in this report is solely for the use of the Client for the purpose in which it has been prepared and Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. Any person or organisation wishing to quote or reproduce any section of this report may only do so with the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd or South Metro Connect. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA WA 6023 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 942-ROE-AEC-SRE Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project South Metro Connect Final Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
    Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Lycosidae) from Canada: a Morphological Description Supported by DNA Barcoding of 19 Congeners
    Zootaxa 3894 (1): 152–160 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3894.1.12 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66AD348F-5A04-4A9F-ADC5-501B4B10804F A new species of Alopecosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) from Canada: a morphological description supported by DNA barcoding of 19 congeners GERGIN A. BLAGOEV1 & CHARLES D. DONDALE2 1 Research Associate, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, [email protected] 2 Retiree, Biodiversity Program, Research Branch, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, [email protected] Abstract A new species, Alopecosa koponeni sp. n., is described from the Arctic part of Manitoba. Individuals of A. koponeni most resemble those of A. pictilis (Emerton, 1885), but are smaller than the latter and differ in the epiginum and in colour pattern in both sexes. DNA barcode results show an interspecific distance of 0.93 between A. koponeni sp. n. and A. pictilis, a shallow genetic divergence that suggests a recent separation. Introduction Spiders of the Canadian Arctic are becoming better known through recent collecting efforts and through published revisions such as those by Dupérré (2013), Marusik et al. (2006), Marusik & Koponen (2001), Saaristo & Koponen (1998), and Saaristo & Marusik (2004). Additionally, two recent checklists also included arctic species (Buckle et al. 2001; Paquin et al. 2010) and a recent study on the spiders of Churchill revealed an undescribed species of Alopecosa, which was given the interim name Alopecosa sp. 1GAB (Blagoev et al.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Synonymy of Two Acantholycosa Species (Araneae, Lycosidae) from the Altai
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 559On: 151–156 the synonymy (2016) of two Acantholycosa species (Araneae, Lycosidae) from the Altai 151 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.559.7048 SHORT COMMUNICATION http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research On the synonymy of two Acantholycosa species (Araneae, Lycosidae) from the Altai Alexander A. Fomichev1, Yuri M. Marusik2,3,4, Seppo Koponen5 1 Altai State University, Lenina Pr., 61, Barnaul, RF-656049, Russia 2 Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan 685000, Russia 3 Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa 4 Far Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russia 5 Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland Corresponding author: Alexander A. Fomichev ([email protected]) Academic editor: Cor Vink | Received 2 November 2015 | Accepted 11 January 2016 | Published 3 February 2016 http://zoobank.org/D28F9C0B-E43C-4601-82D8-EB8AC259C734 Citation: Fomichev AA, Marusik YM, Koponen S (2016) On the synonymy of two Acantholycosa species (Araneae, Lycosidae) from the Altai. ZooKeys 559: 151–156. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.559.7048 Abstract Two species previously known from East Kazakhstan, Acantholycosa katunensis Marusik, Azarkina & Ko- ponen, 2004, known from the holotype male, and A. kurchumensis Marusik, Azarkina & Koponen, 2004, syn. n. known from females, are synonymized, and priority is given to A. katunensis. Acantholycosa ka- tunensis is reported for the first time in the Russian Altai. Both sexes of this species are illustrated, and a distribution map is provided. Keywords Aranei, wolf spider, South Siberia, Russia, new record, new synonymy Copyright Alexander A.
    [Show full text]