Cineaste Style Sheet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cineaste Style Sheet 54 DVD REVIEWS 2/10/12 3:26 PM Page 56 And so, while in Le beau Serge the title Identification is certainly more light- character achieves a kind of redemption by Identification hearted than any of Antonioni’s previous being united with his newborn child thanks films. The opening scene—with film director to the backbreaking efforts and, ultimately, of a Woman Niccolò Farra (Tomas Milian) fumbling for sacrifice of the tubercular François, whose Produced by Giorgio Nocella and Antonio his keys, crawling into his apartment to life may have been shortened by his treks Macrì; directed by Michelangelo Antonioni; avoid setting off the burglar alarm (it goes through the snow, in Les cousins there is no screenplay by Antonioni and Gérard Brach, off anyway), struggling to answer his tele- redemption, and certainly no salvation: in collaboration with Tonino Guerra; phone before the answering machine takes Charles must die in order to preserve the cinematography by Carlo Di Palma; over, and confronting a suspicious neighbor nothingness of his cousin’s lifestyle, edited by Michelangelo Antonioni; music who investigates the commotion armed with although we don’t quite know where that by John Foxx; starring Tomas Milian, a pistol—establishes the protagonist’s mid- lifestyle is going to end up as we hear the Daniela Silverio, Christine Boisson, and life crisis with the comic panache of Woody apartment buzzer sounding to end the film. Marcel Bozzuffi. DVD and Blu-ray, color, Allen. Both films are essential Chabrol. But 130 min., with Italian dialogue and English Niccolò, recently divorced, is at an artistic there is no question that Le beau Serge might subtitles, 1982. A Criterion Collection and personal impasse, searching for a be seen more as a necessary step in the release, distributed by Image Entertainment, woman to fill the void in his upcoming dechristianization of the director than as an www.Image-Entertainment.com. movie project and in his private life (shades independent statement in and of itself. Les of 8 1/2!). The first of his new amores, Mavi cousins, on the other hand, brilliantly and With his late-career masterpiece, Identifi- (Daniela Silverio), is a very modern ragazza: cynically paves the way for the many very cation of a Woman, Michelangelo Antonioni, sexually liberated, self-absorbed (a semi- dark, brilliant, and cynical tales that will aged seventy, returned to the themes, style, nude poster of Mavi adorns her bedroom turn up in Chabrol’s oeuvre. I also need to and milieu that gained him worldwide wall), well-educated, aristocratic, impulsive, add that Les cousins, unlike Le beau Serge, prominence in the 1960s. Following a series and a bit androgynous. The erotic scenes offers a quite effective musical score, in this of films produced abroad—including Blow- between Niccolò and Mavi have a riveting case by Paul Misraki, whose cool and mildly Up, Zabriskie Point, Chung Kuo Cina, and intensity, due to their graphic explicitness. jazzy strains perfectly complement the film’s The Passenger—Identification was the director’s Yet, despite engaging in starkly photographed milieu, as does some more unsettling and first film since Red Desert (1964) to take place sex acts (including several masturbatory, rather percussive music that lead us into the in contemporary Italy, among the decadent oral, and anal variations), Mavi refuses to final scene. bourgeoisie, the director’s usual social setting. talk about sex afterward. In addition, after Both of these black-and-white films have Antonioni’s repatriation also produced a each of these steamy couplings, Antonioni benefited here from their Blu-ray transfers, mellowing of style and a loosening of the cuts to images that hint at the emptiness of although I have not seen the original Criterion austere compositions of his earlier work, the Niccolò-Mavi relationship. After their DVDs. Le beau Serge in particular allows us without diminishing its painterly splendor first sexual encounter, Mavi experiences to take in all of the details, whether in the (courtesy of Carlo Di Palma’s cinematography). vaginal pains; simultaneously, the distant, village or in the various outdoor shots, Clearly recognizable as an Antonioni film, understated wail of a police siren subtly sug- brought into sharp definition by the lighting Identification nonetheless indicated a new gests a moral undercutting of the couple’s and camerawork of cinematographer Henri direction in his oeuvre. Although it received libertinism. After their second sex scene (the Decaë. Both releases offer audio commen- a major prize at Cannes and was nominated one featuring anal stimulation), Antonioni taries, if you are inclined to listen to them, for the Palme d’Or, a destructively negative cuts to a painting of St. Peter’s Basilica, as if and the beau Serge Blu-ray disc includes a review in The New York Times (“an excruci- to reestablish the power of the Church and wonderful documentary, directed by Francis atingly empty work”) provoked its U.S. dis- the superego. (In addition, as she reaches Girod in 2004, entitled Claude Chabrol: Mon tributor to shelve the film. So, instead of orgasm, Mavi narcissistically stares at herself premier film, which features Chabrol himself becoming a “comeback” effort, the film- in a nearby mirror.) Finally, during the third and other surviving members of crew and maker’s career ground to a halt. It is there- erotic escapade, after a beautiful shot of the cast, in particular Brialy and Bernadette fore noteworthy that The Criterion Collec- couple having joyous “make-up sex” under Lafont, who plays Serge’s oversexed sister- tion has released this underrated (and a bed sheet, we cut to a row of unfilled in-law. underseen) film. bookshelves in the morning light, an apt There is also a somewhat annoying black-and-white segment from a 1969 French TV program that shows Chabrol revisiting Sardent. I would pick a bone with film critic Terrence Rafferty who, in the booklet accompanying Les cousins, suggests that, after Les cousins, the director would not “recover his form” until the 1968 Les biches, when in fact there are a good half-dozen outstanding films that followed Les cousins, in particular Les bonnes femmes (1960), an absolute masterpiece that desperately needs a decent DVD. I close by noting that chabrol is actually a word in the French language meaning a mixture of wine and broth. To faire chabrol is to drink this concoction directly out of the bowl, an act that we see in one of the direc- tor’s middle-period films, I think Les noces rouges (1973), which was shot near the region where the term originated.—Royal S. Niccolò (Tomas Milian) replaces one girlfriend with another woman, Ida (Christine Boisson), Brown in Antonioni’s Identification of a Woman (1982) (photo courtesy of The Criterion Collection). 56 CINEASTE, Spring 2012 54 DVD REVIEWS 2/10/12 3:26 PM Page 57 commentary on their empty relationship. comparison between a two-dimensional street sign leading to Mavi’s flat; slogans for In addition to his abiding focus on “sick substitute and flesh-and-blood sexuality the Italian Socialist Party and a Communist Eros,” Antonioni has always been a chroni- contains obvious wit, but it is poignantly hammer and sickle scrawled on walls; and cler of social class in postwar Italy’s il boom. recalled later when Niccolò, having lost natural landscapes) or subtle sound effects Here, in 1982, his sharp observations of the Mavi, forlornly pastes a photograph of (the motorboat, police siren, and jarring haute bourgeoisie remain intact, particularly Louise Brooks onto his rain-soaked window. New Age music). in an elegant party scene in which Niccolò’s The issue of representation is brought up After eliding the details of the breakup discomfort is apparent as he meets Mavi’s throughout the film, but representation is with Ida, Antonioni merely cuts to Niccolò vapid, icy, and haughty friends. At one not merely an individual matter; indeed, the entering his apartment (this time he has his point, Niccolò flicks his cigarette ashes into nearly nude photo of Mavi adorns not only key!). As Niccolò looks out his window, we what he mistakes for an ashtray, only to her wall but also an issue of Time devoted to share his point of view: lush trees and vege- learn that it’s actually a pricey bracelet, and “Europe’s Women Today.” Thus, Antonioni tation amid the oppression of the modern that he’s just soiled an expensive embroi- points to the lackluster state of heterosexual megalopolis, and, in particular, a peculiar dered lace tablecloth. ardor in 1982 Europe and the concurrent tree branch he had stared at before. The pre- Sometime after this soirée is the film’s riflusso, the withdrawal from passionate cise meaning of this evocative burl may most meaningful set-piece: a drive and social commitment, as well as the media- escape denotative exactness, but, like so search through dense nighttime fog. Allusions ization and commodification of pervasive many significant objects in the Antonioni imbricate over intertextual references as eroticism. Finally, Mavi, who apparently has canon, its connotations are myriad. Niccolò and Mavi, on their way to a country had a string of lesbian liaisons in her past, Niccolò, however, does not only stare house built on (metaphorical) hollow drifts into another homoerotic pairing. out at that tree; he also looks out through Roman ruins, lose their way in a blanket of Like Sandro in L’Avventura, Niccolò rose-colored glasses and closes his eyes. The whitish-gray haze. Their verbal argument is merely replaces Mavi with another woman, enrapturing images that follow—Niccolò’s as much a product of the vaporous environ- Ida (Christine Boisson), who physically thoughts, I imagine—are so jarringly incon- ment as of their basic class and emotional resembles his lost lover.
Recommended publications
  • The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117
    The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOD, RICHARD #1117 September 1989 - June 1997 Biography: Richard Roud ( 1929-1989), as director of both the New York and London Film Festivals, was responsible for both discovering and introducing to a wider audience many of the important directors of the latter half th of the 20 - century (many of whom he knew personally) including Bernardo Bertolucci, Robert Bresson, Luis Buiiuel, R.W. Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard, Werner Herzog, Terry Malick, Ermanno Ohni, Jacques Rivette and Martin Scorsese. He was an author of books on Jean-Marie Straub, Jean-Luc Godard, Max Ophuls, and Henri Langlois, as well as the editor of CINEMA: A CRITICAL DICTIONARY. In addition, Mr. Roud wrote extensive criticism on film, the theater and other visual arts for The Manchester Guardian and Sight and Sound and was an occasional contributor to many other publications. At his death he was working on an authorized biography of Fran9ois Truffaut and a book on New Wave film. Richard Roud was a Fulbright recipient and a Chevalier in the Legion of Honor. Scope and contents: The Roud Collection (9 Paige boxes, 2 Manuscript boxes and 3 Packages) consists primarily of book research, articles by RR and printed matter related to the New York Film Festival and prominent directors. Material on Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut and Henri Langlois is particularly extensive. Though considerably smaller, the Correspondence file contains personal letters from many important directors (see List ofNotable Correspondents). The Photographs file contains an eclectic group of movie stills.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Screenwriting'
    Course Materials for 'Understanding Screenwriting' FA/FILM 4501 12.0 Fall and Winter Terms 2002-2003 Evan Wm. Cameron Professor Emeritus Senior Scholar in Screenwriting Graduate Programmes, Film & Video and Philosophy York University [Overview, Outline, Readings and Guidelines (for students) with the Schedule of Lectures and Screenings (for private use of EWC) for an extraordinary double-weighted full- year course for advanced students of screenwriting, meeting for six hours weekly with each term of work constituting a full six-credit course, that the author was permitted to teach with the Graduate Programme of the Department of Film and Video, York University during the academic years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 – the most enlightening experience with respect to designing movies that he was ever permitted to share with students.] Overview for Graduate Students [Preliminary Announcement of Course] Understanding Screenwriting FA/FILM 4501 12.0 Fall and Winter Terms 2002-2003 FA/FILM 4501 A 6.0 & FA/FILM 4501 B 6.0 Understanding Screenwriting: the Studio and Post-Studio Eras Fall/Winter, 2002-2003 Tuesdays & Thursdays, Room 108 9:30 a.m. – 1:30 p.m. Evan William Cameron We shall retrace within these courses the historical 'devolution' of screenwriting, as Robert Towne described it, providing advanced students of writing with the uncommon opportunity to deepen their understanding of the prior achievement of other writers, and to ponder without illusion the nature of the extraordinary task that lies before them should they decide to devote a part of their life to pursuing it. During the fall term we shall examine how a dozen or so writers wrote within the studio system before it collapsed in the late 1950s, including a sustained look at the work of Preston Sturges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
    Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author
    [Show full text]
  • CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague Et Nouveaux Cinémas Contenu Et
    Département de littérature, théâtre et cinéma Professeur : Jean-Pierre Sirois-Trahan Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines Session : Hiver 2020 CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague et nouveaux cinémas Local du cours : CSL-1630 Horaire : Mercredi, 15h30-18h20 Projection : Mercredi, 18h30-21h20 (CSL-1630) Téléphone : 418-656-2131, p. 407074 Bureau : CSL-3447 Courriel : [email protected] Site personnel : https://ulaval.academia.edu/JeanPierreSiroisTrahan Contenu et objectifs du cours Dans l’histoire du cinéma mondial, la Nouvelle Vague (française) peut être considérée comme l’un des événements majeurs, de telle façon que l’on a pu dire qu’il y avait un avant et un après. Deuxième moment de la modernité au cinéma après le néoréalisme italien, son avènement au tournant des années soixante a profondément changé la donne esthétique de l’art cinématographique, et ce jusqu’à aujourd’hui. L’une des caractéristiques les plus essentielles de ce mouvement fut de considérer le cinéma, dans l’exercice même de sa praxis, de façon critique, cinéphile et réflexive. Groupée autour de la revue des Cahiers du Cinéma, cofondée par André Bazin, la Nouvelle Vague est souvent réduite à un groupe de critiques passés à la réalisation : Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Éric Rohmer, Pierre Kast, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze et Marilù Parolini (scénariste). Aussi, il ne faudrait pas oublier ceux que l’on nomma le « groupe Rive gauche » : Agnès Varda, Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Jacques Demy, Jean-Daniel Pollet, Henri Colpi et Jacques Rozier. On peut aussi y rattacher un certain nombre d’outsiders importants, soit immédiatement précurseurs (Jean- Pierre Melville, Georges Franju, Jean Rouch et Alexandre Astruc), soit continuateurs à l’esthétique plus ou moins proche (Marguerite Duras, Jean-Marie Straub et Danièle Huillet, Paula Delsol, Maurice Pialat, Jean Eustache, Chantal Akerman, Philippe Garrel, Jacques Doillon, Catherine Breillat, Danièle Dubroux et André Téchiné).
    [Show full text]
  • A Mode of Production and Distribution
    Chapter Three A Mode of Production and Distribution An Economic Concept: “The Small Budget Film,” Was it Myth or Reality? t has often been assumed that the New Wave provoked a sudden Ibreak in the production practices of French cinema, by favoring small budget films. In an industry characterized by an inflationary spiral of ever-increasing production costs, this phenomenon is sufficiently original to warrant investigation. Did most of the films considered to be part of this movement correspond to this notion of a small budget? We would first have to ask: what, in 1959, was a “small budget” movie? The average cost of a film increased from roughly $218,000 in 1955 to $300,000 in 1959. That year, at the moment of the emergence of the New Wave, 133 French films were produced; of these, 33 cost more than $400,000 and 74 cost more than $200,000. That leaves 26 films with a budget of less than $200,000, or “low budget productions;” however, that can hardly be used as an adequate criterion for movies to qualify as “New Wave.”1 Even so, this budgetary trait has often been employed to establish a genealogy for the movement. It involves, primarily, “marginal” films produced outside the dominant commercial system. Two Small Budget Films, “Outside the System” From the point of view of their mode of production, two titles are often imposed as reference points: Jean-Pierre Melville’s self-produced Silence of 49 A Mode of Production and Distribution the Sea, 1947, and Agnes Varda’s La Pointe courte (Short Point), made seven years later, in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • La Fleur Du Mal
    Wettbewerb/IFB 2003 LA FLEUR DU MAL LA FLEUR DU MAL THE FLOWER OF EVIL Regie:Claude Chabrol Frankreich 2002 Darsteller Anne Nathalie Baye Länge 104 Min. François Benoît Magimel Format 35 mm, 1:1.66 Tante Line Suzanne Flon Farbe Gérard Bernard Le Coq Michèle Mélanie Doutey Stabliste Matthieu Thomas Chabrol Buch Caroline Eliacheff Fanny Schwiegervater Henri Attal Louise L.Lambrichs Kleiner Junge Kevin Ahyi Claude Chabrol Ehrenamtlicher Helfer Jérôme Bertin Kamera Eduardo Serra Thérèse Françoise Bertin Kameraführung Michel Thiriet Fanny Caroline Baehr Schnitt Monique Fardoulis Brissot Didier Bénureau Ton Pierre Lenoir Yves Pouët Yvon Crenn Thierry Lebon Laborant Jean-Marc Druet Musik Matthieu Chabrol Bürgermeister Michel Herbault Ausstattung Françoise Benoît- Wahlhelfer Edmond Kastelnik Fresco Zweiter Junge Marius de Laage Kostüm Mic Cheminal Reporterin Isabelle Mamère Regieassistenz Cécile Maistre Mélanie Doutey Hélène Juliette Meyniac Produktionsltg. Nathalie Kreuther Jules François Maistre Produzent Marin Karmitz LA FLEUR DU MAL Zweiter Wahlhelfer Jean-Pierre Marin Ausführender Marthe Michèle Dascain Produzent Yvon Crenn Wird Schuld von Generation zu Generation weitervererbt? Welche Folgen Dominique Dominique Pivain Co-Produktion France 3 Cinéma hat ein ungesühntes Verbrechen für den Täter, seine Familie und seine Nachkommen? Am Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs, als man in Frankreich mit Produktion den Kollaborateuren abrechnet, wird eine Frau von einem Verbrechen frei- MK2 Productions gesprochen, das sie begangen hat. – Chabrols Film beginnt in der Gegen- 55,rue Traversière F-75012 Paris wart,während der heißen Phase einer Kommunalwahl,in deren Verlauf wie- Tel.:1-44 67 30 80 derum ein Verbrechen geschieht. Wer ist schuldig? Derjenige, der die Tat Fax:1-43 41 32 30 begangen hat, oder derjenige, der die Schuld auf sich nimmt? [email protected] Im Mittelpunkt der Handlung stehen die drei noch lebenden Generationen der Familie Charpin-Vasseur, einer Familie aus dem Bürgertum von Borde- Weltvertrieb MK2 aux.
    [Show full text]
  • François Truffaut's Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-Viewed
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 29, núms. 1-2 (2019) · ISSN: 2014-668X François Truffaut’s Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-viewed ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract Truffaut’s early protagonists, like many of those produced by the New Wave, were rebels or misfits who felt stifled by conventional social definitions. His early cinematic style was as anxious to rip chords as his characters were. Unlike Godard, Truffaut went on in his career to commit himself, not to continued experiment in film form or radical critique of visual imagery, but to formal themes like art and life, film and fiction, and art and education. This article reconsiders a film that embodies such themes, in addition to featuring characters who feel stifled by conventional social definitions: Jules and Jim. Keywords: François Truffaut; French film; New Wave; Jules and Jim; Henri- Pierre Roché Resumen Los primeros protagonistas de Truffaut, como muchos de los producidos por la New Wave, eran rebeldes o inadaptados que se sentían agobiados por las convenciones sociales convencionales. Su estilo cinematográfico temprano estaba tan ansioso por romper moldes como sus personajes. A diferencia de Godard, Truffaut continuó en su carrera comprometiéndose, no a seguir experimentando en forma de película o crítica radical de las imágenes visuales, sino a temas formales como el arte y la vida, el cine y la ficción, y el arte y la educación. Este artículo reconsidera una película que encarna dichos temas, además de presentar personajes que se sienten ahogados: Jules y Jim. Palabras clave: François Truffaut, cine francés, New Wave; Jules and Jim, Henri-Pierre Roché.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTHLY GUIDE April 2015 | ISSUE 69 | South Africa / Zimbabwe / Zambia
    MONTHLY GUIDE APRIL 2015 | ISSUE 69 | SOUTH AFRICA / ZIMBABWE / ZAMBIA Sophia: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow Vanilla and Chocolate School Is Over Fedez And more EUROCHANNEL GUIDE | MAY 2015 | 1 HOLLYWOOD BROOKLYN MAY 29 - JUNE 7 2015 ILLUMINATE EDITION Venues: WYTHE HOTEL // WINDMILL STUDIOS NYC NITEHAWK CINEMA // MADE IN NY MEDIA CENTER BY IFP 2 | EUROCHANNEL GUIDE | MAY 2015 | MONTHLY GUIDE| MAY 2015 | ISSUE 70 Sophia: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow following our five successful editions, this month, we present the lineup of our much beloved month on Eurochannel, a unique occasion in the year to appreciate Italy beyond stereotypes and mainstream cinema from Hollywood, and to be delighted with the greatest cinematic productions from “The Boot of Europe.” Welcome to the 6th Edition of the Italian Month: Viva il Cinema! Vanilla and Chocolate These enchanting movies gather a number of A-list actors offering us the performances of a lifetime. This month, you can enjoy the talent of Italian top-billed stars such as comedy legend Diego Abatantuono, Maria Grazia Cucinotta (The World Is Not Enough, Il Postino: The Postman, The Rite, The Sopranos, The Simpsons). But beyond awards and festivals, the films and documentaries present in this edition offer a common thing: the desire to overcome difficulties and to offer hope and encouragement to pursue our dreams. In films such as School Is Over, we witness how a conflicted teenager is rescued by his Fedez teachers, who also save their marriage in the process. Legends also teach us the importance of perseverance despite the tribulations that may arise. Documentaries such as Sophia: Yesterday, Table of Today, and Tomorrow, and Tonino Guerra, A Poet in the Movies reveal the contents dreams, hurdles, passions and setbacks of Italian cinema legends Sophia Loren and Tonino Guerra.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the French New Wave (Revisited)
    The French New Wave (revisited) It doesn’t matter where you take things from, but where you take them to. Jean-Luc Godard Dr. Nicos Terzis, Adjunct Professor, Department of Graphic Design, School of Fine Arts, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece Abstract: The proposed paper will attempt to delineate the history and the aesthetic characteristics of the French Nouvelle Vague, the most famous cinematic movement in history. The structure of the paper will mainly evolve around the following questions and topics: where did the name of the cinematic movement ―Nouvelle Vague‖ originate from? What kind of influences ―Nouvelle Vague‖ exerted on other film movements around the world? Which role did the Cinemathèque Française and Henri Langlois, its creator, play in the formation of the aforementioned cinematic movement? What role did the French film magazines of that period (e.g. Cahiers du Cinéma) play in the creation of this new wave? Who are the main representatives of the movement (Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette) and the Left Bank directors: Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Agnes Varda? Who are the Precursors of the Nouvelle Vague? What are the modernist aesthetic characteristics of this world’s most famous cinematic movement, in terms of form [mise en scene] & narrative structure [montage]? Phenomenology and diffused existentialism in the movements’ themes and characters. Keywords: Nouvelle Vague, Modernism, Montage, Auteur theory, Camera Stylo 1 Prologue ―Αgainst modern
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Chabrol: French Director's Work at Museum
    •ef NO. 101 he Museum of Modern Art FUR IMMEDIATE RELEASE west 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 Tel. 956-6100 Cable: Modernart CLAUDE CHABROL: FRENCH DIRECTOR'S WORK AT MUSEUM THE FILMS OF CLAUDE CHABROL, the French director who helped pioneer the "New wave,** will begin October 2 at The Museum of Modern Art. Among the 14 films in the series, organized by Adrienne Mancia, Associate Curator of the Department of Film, are **Le Beau Serge*' (1938), Chabrol's first film, rarely seen in this country; **Les Bonnes Femmes" (1960), seldom shown here though it is regarded as one of his best; **Le Boucher,'* an entry in the just completed 8th New York Film Festival; *«Que La Bete heure** (**This Man Must Die**), which will open shortly in New York; and **La Rupture,'* his most recent movie, just premiered In Paris and not yet acquired for distribution in the U.S.A. Born in Paris in 1930, Chabrol studied pharmacy but gave up that profession for a total involvement in film. In the 1950s, he wrote for **Cahier8 du Cinema** along with Truffaut and Godard, and in 1957 he co-authored a book on Hitchcock with Eric Rohmer, also to become a director. An inheritance from his first wife's family enabled Chabrol, in 1958, to make '*Le Beau Serge,** which was followed the same year by **Les Cousins,** which won the Golden Bear Award at the 1959 Berlin Film Festival. These films, along with Godard*s **Breathless,** Truffaut's "The 400 Blows** and Resnais* **Hiroshima Mon Amour,** signalled a renaissance for the French film which was to have an impact around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Films for Filmmakers
    101 (OR SO) FILMS FOR FILMMAKERS The purpose of this list is not to create an exhaustive list of every important film ever made or filmmaker who ever lived. That task would be impossible. The purpose is to create a succinct list of films and filmmakers that have had a major impact on filmmaking. A second purpose is to help contextualize films and filmmakers within the various film movements with which they are associated. The list is organized chronologically, with important film movements (e.g. Italian Neorealism, The French New Wave) inserted at the appropriate time. AFI (American Film Institute) Top 100 films are in blue (green if they were on the original 1998 list but were removed for the 10th anniversary list). Guidelines: 1. The majority of filmmakers will be represented by a single film (or two), often their first or first significant one. This does not mean that they made no other worthy films; rather the films listed tend to be monumental films that helped define a genre or period. For example, Arthur Penn made numerous notable films, but his 1967 Bonnie and Clyde ushered in the New Hollywood and changed filmmaking for the next two decades (or more). 2. Some filmmakers do have multiple films listed, but this tends to be reserved for filmmakers who are truly masters of the craft (e.g. Alfred Hitchcock, Stanley Kubrick) or filmmakers whose careers have had a long span (e.g. Luis Buñuel, 1928-1977). A few filmmakers who re-invented themselves later in their careers (e.g. David Cronenberg–his early body horror and later psychological dramas) will have multiple films listed, representing each period of their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Chabrol Henri-Paul Senécal
    Document généré le 26 sept. 2021 18:46 Séquences La revue de cinéma Flash sur un réalisateur Claude Chabrol Henri-Paul Senécal Nouvelle Vague Numéro 35, janvier 1964 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/51894ac Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) La revue Séquences Inc. ISSN 0037-2412 (imprimé) 1923-5100 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Senécal, H.-P. (1964). Flash sur un réalisateur : Claude Chabrol. Séquences, (35), 34–36. Tous droits réservés © La revue Séquences Inc., 1964 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ FLASH SUR UN RÉALISATEUR CLAUDE L Claude Chabrol tournant Landru Henri-Paul Senécal jour. Ses temps libres, il les passe en des palabres interminables au Claude Chabrol est né à Paris, Café de la Comédie avec d'autres le 24 juin 1930, de parents phar­ jeunes mordus du cinéma. On é- maciens. Réfugié pendant la guer­ coute religieusement André Bazin re à Sardent, un village de la Creu- discourir de l'avenir du septième ze, il fonde, à treize ans, le "Ciné­ art. Chabrol assure sa subsistance ma Sardentais" dans le garage fa­ par des articles aux Cahiers du Ci­ milial.
    [Show full text]