The Films the Films

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Films the Films THE FRENCH NEW WAVE March 9 continued tions that were a signature of their LE BEAU SERGE (1958) Director: Claude work. Thus, their intellectual fer­ Chabrol. 97 minutes. With Gerald ment was translated into highly Blain, Jean-Claude Brialy, Bernadette spirited recombinations and in­ LaFont. troductions of new elements into the grammar of film. The first New Wave feature: a "moral" drama about a wanderer who Some of their main influences were returns to his roots to find his old American genre films, even B pic­ village friend a drunkard. In- tures (like Monogram Studios', fluenced by Hitchcock, Chabrol here dedicatee of Godard's BREATHLESS), displays his own style of critical with borrowings to various degrees detachment in dealing with the theme from Hitchcock, Lang, etc. These in­ of "exchange." The bucolic setting fluences were the staples of Bazin's would be reversed a year later in his "auteur" theory. Bazin stressed mise city mouse/country mouse {jrama THE en scene, the fabrication of a COUSINS, made with' the same leads. self-contained artistically con­ the escape into the House of Fiction trolled visual universe by the in CELINE AND JULIE ... , illustrates March 16 director (cf. Truffaut's DAY FOR the extremes of poetic inspiration NIGHT) as the center of creativity in and improvisation in the New Wave. THE SIGN OF THE LION (1959) Director: film. Rohmer and Chabrol, for exam­ Eric Rohmer. Approximately 90 ple, wrote a book on Hitchcock, as Unlike most films of their time, none minutes. did Truffaut later on, all ap­ of these turn into star preciating the moral dimensions of vehicles, either distanced or A simple Renoiresque story (cf. his particular "universe," previously derivative in their dependence of BOUDU SAVED FROM DROWNING) about ignored by "serious" critics. their effects upon "a tradition of Pierre, a violinist waiting for an quality," the well-made, smoothly inheritance, alone and isolated in a There was also a harkening back to edited, glossy films against which Paris "deserted" in August. He meets the classic and experimental films of they were so much in revolt. If, a tramp and forms a musical street the 1930s period: Vigo (ZERO FOR CON­ eventually, some of these directors' act for tourists so he can survive styles and ideas were to supplant or DUCT = THE 400 BLOWS) and Renoir until his friends return. Dec~ptively (Chabrot's LEDA). And though the even become the new mainstream in simple, the film is much about the films have the same naturalistic feel France, indeed, world cinema for a light, mood and atmosphere of a of early French sound films, there is time, it is still instructive to see particular place and time (e.g., FULL no slavishness to the literal; in fact, these early iconoclastic examples of MOON IN PARIS) with all the hallmarks there is a revelling, as in Vigo and the first crest of the New Wave. of Rohmer's later style. Renoir, in the self-reflexive nature of cinema. Elements of voyeurism, -David Schloss March 23 surrealism, histrionic manjpulations of reality abound. They admired THE FILMS OPHELIA (1962) Director: Claude energy combined with meaning, in­ Chabrol. 105 minutes. With Alida novation versus the gentility of the Valli, Andre Jocelyn, Claude Cerval. purely literary on film. March 2 A man imagines himself to be in The films in this series indicate Hamlet's situation and projects roles some of these trends. PARIS VU PAR ... SIX IN PARIS (1964) Directors: upon his mother and uncle. An is a paean to Paris itself, in which Chabrol, Douchet, Godard, Pollet, exploration of the nature of evil and each of the six sections is meant to Rohmer, Rouch. 98 minutes. With madness in a psychological depth exemplify the temper and spirit of a Stephane Audran, Claude Chabrol, beyond the Hitchcockian, with the particular Parisian quarter, a Joanna Shimkus, et al. particular brand of Chabrot's naturalistic un-studio-bound exercise perverse humor about high bourgeois in freedom. THE SIGN OF THE LION, as Six stories of Parisians, family circles. The film features a in most later Rohmer films, is a organized by neighborhood. Chabrot's film within a film produced by the study of a particular place and time LA MOUETTE, a typically funny/tragic progressively mad would-be Hamlet, of year as much as a "story." Here it devastating demonstration of one of many parallels to is slight, but layered and deepened bourgeois family life, stars Chabrol Shakespeare's text. with particularities of observation, himself and his wife. Godard's allowing the characters to follow 'MONTPARNASSE ET LEVALLOIS expands an March 30 their own random inclinations in the anecdote from A WOMAN IS A WOMAN freedom of Renoir's BOUDU, the light with typical Godardian playfulness: a CELINE AND JULIE GO BOATING (1974) and moods of summer mixed with woman mixes up letters to her two Director: Jacques Rivette. 195 Rohmer's usual intelligent talk. Both lovers (shot in cinema verite style minutes. With Juliette Berto, of Chabrot's films are exercises in by an American, Albert Maysles). Dominique Labourier. Subtitle: "cutting to the bone" moral iI­ Rohmer's PLACE DE l'ETOILE is as much Phantom Ladies Over Paris. IU,strations of dichotomies (e.g., the about its location, an enormous the city mouse/country mouse theme of circular hub of avenues, as the Two woman friends enter the House lE B~AU SERGE, which he would return guilt-ridden fastidious clerk at its of Fiction to save a child from being to often, as in lES COUSINS, lES center. Jean Rouch is best' known for murdered. Outside, it's Paris; BICRES, etc.) with a Hitchcockian CHRONICLE OF A SUMMER, an early inside, stories loosely based on Henry overlay of guilt and moral reckoning. cinem~ verite feature. James are being enacted. An aura of In OPHELIA he gives us another focus: mysticism prevails: themes of fiction the more pervers~ and flamboYClnt y- vs. reality, role-reversals, chological self-indulgence of the Pirandellan characters in search of characters, of Hitchcockian propor­ an author, abound in this beautifuliy tions, but with overtones of the photographed lyrical comic drama. schematic fatalisms of Fritz lang. Typically, Rivette expe(iments with Rivette, with his explorations of "real time" and the relation of the dream/reality, art versus life, with actor to his or her role. .
Recommended publications
  • The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117
    The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOD, RICHARD #1117 September 1989 - June 1997 Biography: Richard Roud ( 1929-1989), as director of both the New York and London Film Festivals, was responsible for both discovering and introducing to a wider audience many of the important directors of the latter half th of the 20 - century (many of whom he knew personally) including Bernardo Bertolucci, Robert Bresson, Luis Buiiuel, R.W. Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard, Werner Herzog, Terry Malick, Ermanno Ohni, Jacques Rivette and Martin Scorsese. He was an author of books on Jean-Marie Straub, Jean-Luc Godard, Max Ophuls, and Henri Langlois, as well as the editor of CINEMA: A CRITICAL DICTIONARY. In addition, Mr. Roud wrote extensive criticism on film, the theater and other visual arts for The Manchester Guardian and Sight and Sound and was an occasional contributor to many other publications. At his death he was working on an authorized biography of Fran9ois Truffaut and a book on New Wave film. Richard Roud was a Fulbright recipient and a Chevalier in the Legion of Honor. Scope and contents: The Roud Collection (9 Paige boxes, 2 Manuscript boxes and 3 Packages) consists primarily of book research, articles by RR and printed matter related to the New York Film Festival and prominent directors. Material on Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut and Henri Langlois is particularly extensive. Though considerably smaller, the Correspondence file contains personal letters from many important directors (see List ofNotable Correspondents). The Photographs file contains an eclectic group of movie stills.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of the Nouvelle Vague
    ARTICLES · Cinema Comparat/ive Cinema · Vol. I · No. 2. · 2013 · 77-82 Paradoxes of the Nouvelle Vague Marcos Uzal ABSTRACT This essay begins at the start of the magazine Cahiers du cinéma and with the film-making debut of five of its main members: François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette and Jean-Luc Godard. At the start they have shared approaches, tastes, passions and dislikes (above all, about a group of related film-makers from so-called ‘classical cinema’). Over the course of time, their aesthetic and political positions begin to divide them, both as people and in terms of their work, until they reach a point where reconciliation is not posible between the ‘midfield’ film-makers (Truffaut and Chabrol) and the others, who choose to control their conditions or methods of production: Rohmer, Rivette and Godard. The essay also proposes a new view of work by Rivette and Godard, exploring a relationship between their interest in film shoots and montage processes, and their affinities with various avant-gardes: early Russian avant-garde in Godard’s case and in Rivette’s, 1970s American avant-gardes and their European translation. KEYWORDS Nouvelle Vague, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, radical, politics, aesthetics, montage. 77 PARADOXES OF THE NOUVELLE VAGUE In this essay the term ‘Nouvelle Vague’ refers that had emerged from it: they considered that specifically to the five film-makers in this group cinematic form should be explored as a kind who emerged from the magazine Cahiers du of contraband, using the classic art of mise-en- cinéma: Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette, Jean-Luc scène rather than a revolutionary or modernist Godard, Claude Chabrol and François Truffaut.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
    Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Elevator to the Gallows
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research CUNY Graduate Center 2006 Review of Elevator to the Gallows Michael Adams City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_pubs/135 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Elevator to the Gallows (Criterion Collection, 4.25.2006) Louis Malle’s 1958 film is notable for introducing many of the elements that would soon become familiar in the work of the French New Wave directors. Elevator to the Gallows conveys the sense of an artist trying to present a reality not previously seen in film, but a reality constantly touched by artifice. The film is also notable for introducing Jeanne Moreau to the international film audience. Although she had been in movies for ten years, she had not yet shown the distinctive Moreau persona. Florence Carala (Moreau) and Julien Tavernier (Maurice Ronet) are lovers plotting to kill her husband, also his boss, the slimy arms dealer Simon (Jean Wall). The narrative’s uniqueness comes from the lovers never appearing together. The film opens with a phone conversation between them, and there are incriminating photos of the once-happy couple at the end. In between, Julien pulls off what he thinks is a perfect crime. When he forgets a vital piece of evidence, however, he becomes stuck in an elevator. Then his car is stolen for a joyride by Louis (Georges Poujouly), attempting some James Dean-like rebellious swagger, and his girlfriend, Veronique (Yori Bertin).
    [Show full text]
  • CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague Et Nouveaux Cinémas Contenu Et
    Département de littérature, théâtre et cinéma Professeur : Jean-Pierre Sirois-Trahan Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines Session : Hiver 2020 CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague et nouveaux cinémas Local du cours : CSL-1630 Horaire : Mercredi, 15h30-18h20 Projection : Mercredi, 18h30-21h20 (CSL-1630) Téléphone : 418-656-2131, p. 407074 Bureau : CSL-3447 Courriel : [email protected] Site personnel : https://ulaval.academia.edu/JeanPierreSiroisTrahan Contenu et objectifs du cours Dans l’histoire du cinéma mondial, la Nouvelle Vague (française) peut être considérée comme l’un des événements majeurs, de telle façon que l’on a pu dire qu’il y avait un avant et un après. Deuxième moment de la modernité au cinéma après le néoréalisme italien, son avènement au tournant des années soixante a profondément changé la donne esthétique de l’art cinématographique, et ce jusqu’à aujourd’hui. L’une des caractéristiques les plus essentielles de ce mouvement fut de considérer le cinéma, dans l’exercice même de sa praxis, de façon critique, cinéphile et réflexive. Groupée autour de la revue des Cahiers du Cinéma, cofondée par André Bazin, la Nouvelle Vague est souvent réduite à un groupe de critiques passés à la réalisation : Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Éric Rohmer, Pierre Kast, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze et Marilù Parolini (scénariste). Aussi, il ne faudrait pas oublier ceux que l’on nomma le « groupe Rive gauche » : Agnès Varda, Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Jacques Demy, Jean-Daniel Pollet, Henri Colpi et Jacques Rozier. On peut aussi y rattacher un certain nombre d’outsiders importants, soit immédiatement précurseurs (Jean- Pierre Melville, Georges Franju, Jean Rouch et Alexandre Astruc), soit continuateurs à l’esthétique plus ou moins proche (Marguerite Duras, Jean-Marie Straub et Danièle Huillet, Paula Delsol, Maurice Pialat, Jean Eustache, Chantal Akerman, Philippe Garrel, Jacques Doillon, Catherine Breillat, Danièle Dubroux et André Téchiné).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Men
    A Sony Pictures Classics Release Armada Films and Why Not Productions present OF GODS AND MEN A film by Xavier Beauvois Starring Lambert Wilson and Michael Lonsdale France's official selection for the 83rd Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film 2010 Official Selections: Toronto International Film Festival | Telluride Film Festival | New York Film Festival Nominee: 2010 European Film Award for Best Film Nominee: 2010 Carlo di Palma European Cinematographer, European Film Award Winner: Grand Prix; Ecumenical Jury Prize - 2010Cannes Film Festival Winner: Best Foreign Language Film, 2010 National Board of Review Winner: FIPRESCI Award for Best Foreign Language Film of the Year, 2011 Palm Springs International Film Festival www.ofgodsandmenmovie.com Release Date (NY/LA): 02/25/2011 | TRT: 120 min MPAA: Rated PG-13 | Language: French East Coast Publicist West Coast Publicist Distributor Sophie Gluck & Associates Block-Korenbrot Sony Pictures Classics Sophie Gluck Ziggy Kozlowski Carmelo Pirrone 124 West 79th St. Melody Korenbrot Lindsay Macik New York, NY 10024 110 S. Fairfax Ave., Ste 310 550 Madison Avenue Phone (212) 595-2432 Los Angeles, CA 90036 New York, NY 10022 [email protected] Phone (323) 634-7001 Phone (212) 833-8833 Fax (323) 634-7030 Fax (212) 833-8844 SYNOPSIS Eight French Christian monks live in harmony with their Muslim brothers in a monastery perched in the mountains of North Africa in the 1990s. When a crew of foreign workers is massacred by an Islamic fundamentalist group, fear sweeps though the region. The army offers them protection, but the monks refuse. Should they leave? Despite the growing menace in their midst, they slowly realize that they have no choice but to stay… come what may.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mode of Production and Distribution
    Chapter Three A Mode of Production and Distribution An Economic Concept: “The Small Budget Film,” Was it Myth or Reality? t has often been assumed that the New Wave provoked a sudden Ibreak in the production practices of French cinema, by favoring small budget films. In an industry characterized by an inflationary spiral of ever-increasing production costs, this phenomenon is sufficiently original to warrant investigation. Did most of the films considered to be part of this movement correspond to this notion of a small budget? We would first have to ask: what, in 1959, was a “small budget” movie? The average cost of a film increased from roughly $218,000 in 1955 to $300,000 in 1959. That year, at the moment of the emergence of the New Wave, 133 French films were produced; of these, 33 cost more than $400,000 and 74 cost more than $200,000. That leaves 26 films with a budget of less than $200,000, or “low budget productions;” however, that can hardly be used as an adequate criterion for movies to qualify as “New Wave.”1 Even so, this budgetary trait has often been employed to establish a genealogy for the movement. It involves, primarily, “marginal” films produced outside the dominant commercial system. Two Small Budget Films, “Outside the System” From the point of view of their mode of production, two titles are often imposed as reference points: Jean-Pierre Melville’s self-produced Silence of 49 A Mode of Production and Distribution the Sea, 1947, and Agnes Varda’s La Pointe courte (Short Point), made seven years later, in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • La Fleur Du Mal
    Wettbewerb/IFB 2003 LA FLEUR DU MAL LA FLEUR DU MAL THE FLOWER OF EVIL Regie:Claude Chabrol Frankreich 2002 Darsteller Anne Nathalie Baye Länge 104 Min. François Benoît Magimel Format 35 mm, 1:1.66 Tante Line Suzanne Flon Farbe Gérard Bernard Le Coq Michèle Mélanie Doutey Stabliste Matthieu Thomas Chabrol Buch Caroline Eliacheff Fanny Schwiegervater Henri Attal Louise L.Lambrichs Kleiner Junge Kevin Ahyi Claude Chabrol Ehrenamtlicher Helfer Jérôme Bertin Kamera Eduardo Serra Thérèse Françoise Bertin Kameraführung Michel Thiriet Fanny Caroline Baehr Schnitt Monique Fardoulis Brissot Didier Bénureau Ton Pierre Lenoir Yves Pouët Yvon Crenn Thierry Lebon Laborant Jean-Marc Druet Musik Matthieu Chabrol Bürgermeister Michel Herbault Ausstattung Françoise Benoît- Wahlhelfer Edmond Kastelnik Fresco Zweiter Junge Marius de Laage Kostüm Mic Cheminal Reporterin Isabelle Mamère Regieassistenz Cécile Maistre Mélanie Doutey Hélène Juliette Meyniac Produktionsltg. Nathalie Kreuther Jules François Maistre Produzent Marin Karmitz LA FLEUR DU MAL Zweiter Wahlhelfer Jean-Pierre Marin Ausführender Marthe Michèle Dascain Produzent Yvon Crenn Wird Schuld von Generation zu Generation weitervererbt? Welche Folgen Dominique Dominique Pivain Co-Produktion France 3 Cinéma hat ein ungesühntes Verbrechen für den Täter, seine Familie und seine Nachkommen? Am Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs, als man in Frankreich mit Produktion den Kollaborateuren abrechnet, wird eine Frau von einem Verbrechen frei- MK2 Productions gesprochen, das sie begangen hat. – Chabrols Film beginnt in der Gegen- 55,rue Traversière F-75012 Paris wart,während der heißen Phase einer Kommunalwahl,in deren Verlauf wie- Tel.:1-44 67 30 80 derum ein Verbrechen geschieht. Wer ist schuldig? Derjenige, der die Tat Fax:1-43 41 32 30 begangen hat, oder derjenige, der die Schuld auf sich nimmt? [email protected] Im Mittelpunkt der Handlung stehen die drei noch lebenden Generationen der Familie Charpin-Vasseur, einer Familie aus dem Bürgertum von Borde- Weltvertrieb MK2 aux.
    [Show full text]
  • François Truffaut's Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-Viewed
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 29, núms. 1-2 (2019) · ISSN: 2014-668X François Truffaut’s Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-viewed ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract Truffaut’s early protagonists, like many of those produced by the New Wave, were rebels or misfits who felt stifled by conventional social definitions. His early cinematic style was as anxious to rip chords as his characters were. Unlike Godard, Truffaut went on in his career to commit himself, not to continued experiment in film form or radical critique of visual imagery, but to formal themes like art and life, film and fiction, and art and education. This article reconsiders a film that embodies such themes, in addition to featuring characters who feel stifled by conventional social definitions: Jules and Jim. Keywords: François Truffaut; French film; New Wave; Jules and Jim; Henri- Pierre Roché Resumen Los primeros protagonistas de Truffaut, como muchos de los producidos por la New Wave, eran rebeldes o inadaptados que se sentían agobiados por las convenciones sociales convencionales. Su estilo cinematográfico temprano estaba tan ansioso por romper moldes como sus personajes. A diferencia de Godard, Truffaut continuó en su carrera comprometiéndose, no a seguir experimentando en forma de película o crítica radical de las imágenes visuales, sino a temas formales como el arte y la vida, el cine y la ficción, y el arte y la educación. Este artículo reconsidera una película que encarna dichos temas, además de presentar personajes que se sienten ahogados: Jules y Jim. Palabras clave: François Truffaut, cine francés, New Wave; Jules and Jim, Henri-Pierre Roché.
    [Show full text]
  • Marco Polo – the Label of Discovery
    Marco Polo – The Label of Discovery Doubt was expressed by his contemporaries as to the truth of Marco Polo’s account of his years at the court of the Mongol Emperor of China. For some he was known as a man of a million lies, and one recent scholar has plausibly suggested that the account of his travels was a fiction inspired by a family dispute. There is, though, no doubt about the musical treasures daily uncovered by the Marco Polo record label. To paraphrase Marco Polo himself: All people who wish to know the varied music of men and the peculiarities of the various regions of the world, buy these recordings and listen with open ears. The original concept of the Marco Polo label was to bring to listeners unknown compositions by well-known composers. There was, at the same time, an ambition to bring the East to the West. Since then there have been many changes in public taste and in the availability of recorded music. Composers once little known are now easily available in recordings. Marco Polo, in consequence, has set out on further adventures of discovery and exploration. One early field of exploration lay in the work of later Romantic composers, whose turn has now come again. In addition to pioneering recordings of the operas of Franz Schreker, Der ferne Klang (The Distant Sound), Die Gezeichneten (The Marked Ones) and Die Flammen (The Flames), were three operas by Wagner’s son, Siegfried. Der Bärenhäuter (The Man in the Bear’s Skin), Banadietrich and Schwarzschwanenreich (The Kingdom of the Black Swan) explore a mysterious medieval world of German legend in a musical language more akin to that of his teacher Humperdinck than to that of his father.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Evolving Authorship, Developing Contexts: 'Life Lessons'
    Notes 1 Evolving Authorship, Developing Contexts: ‘Life Lessons’ 1. This trajectory finds its seminal outlining in Caughie (1981a), being variously replicated in, for example, Lapsley and Westlake (1988: 105–28), Stoddart (1995), Crofts (1998), Gerstner (2003), Staiger (2003) and Wexman (2003). 2. Compare the oft-quoted words of Sarris: ‘The art of the cinema … is not so much what as how …. Auteur criticism is a reaction against sociological criticism that enthroned the what against the how …. The whole point of a meaningful style is that it unifies the what and the how into a personal state- ment’ (1968: 36). 3. For a fuller discussion of the conception of film authorship here described, see Grist (2000: 1–9). 4. While for this book New Hollywood Cinema properly refers only to this phase of filmmaking, the term has been used by some to designate ‘either something diametrically opposed to’ such filmmaking, ‘or some- thing inclusive of but much larger than it’ (Smith, M. 1998: 11). For the most influential alternative position regarding what he calls ‘the New Hollywood’, see Schatz (1993). For further discussion of the debates sur- rounding New Hollywood Cinema, see Kramer (1998), King (2002), Neale (2006) and King (2007). 5. ‘Star image’ is a concept coined by Richard Dyer in relation to film stars, but it can be extended to other filmmaking personnel. To wit: ‘A star image is made out of media texts that can be grouped together as promotion, publicity, films and commentaries/criticism’ (1979: 68). 6. See, for example, Grant (2000), or the conception of ‘post-auteurism’ out- lined and critically demonstrated in Verhoeven (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2001 Page 1 of 7
    Screen/Society Fall 2001 Page 1 of 7 Screen/Society Fall 2001 Schedule Update 11/12: The Richard White Auditorium will not be 35mm-ready until after the Fall Semester. In order to accomodate 35mm, some screening dates and locations have been changed. Please check this website regularly for updates. All 35mm film programming will be held in Griffith. Screen/Society was started in 1991 by graduate students in English and the Graduate Program in Literature working with staff in the Program in Film and Video. It has continued to provide challenging programming for the Duke community, emphasizing the importance of screening work in its original format, whether video, 16mm or 35mm. Our goal is to advance the academic study of film at Duke and to work with Arts and Sciences Departments to find ways to relate film, video, and digital art to studies in other disciplines. Screen/Society encompasses the following components: z Public Exhibition ? department-, center- and program-curated film series z Southern Circuit ? touring series organized by the South Carolina Arts Commission featuring new works and the artists in person z North Carolina Latin American Film Festival ? touring series presented at state schools and universities z Cinemateque ? Arts and Sciences course-related film screenings Films will be screened at 8pm in the Richard White Auditorium on Duke University?s East Campus, unless otherwise noted. Please check schedule for screening dates. All films are free to the general public unless otherwise noted. Public Exhibition provides an opportunity for departments, programs, and centers to curate film series. These series may be related to courses, research or broad themes of interest.
    [Show full text]