DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Analysis of the Marginalization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative Analysis of the Marginalization THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF HATE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MARGINALIZATION AND DEHUMANIZATION OF HOMOSEXUALS IN NAZI GERMANY AND IN THE PRE-STONEWALL UNITED STATES MARIO GUERRERO-CORAL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN EDUCATION YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO DECEMBER 2019 © Mario Guerrero-Coral, 2019 ii ABSTRACT This research study explores and compares substantive and rhetorical strategies through Which homosexuals came to be reviled and pathologized in Nazi Germany and the pre-StoneWall US by sufficiently large segments of their respective societies that their persecution and eradication became tolerated. Considering that the majority of manifestations of discrimination (e.g., homophobia, racism, sexism, anti-Semitism) are mostly discursive, my analysis focuses on the reproduction of hatred and discrimination through different types of text and talk within the broader sociopolitical and religious contexts of both Nazi Germany (1933–1945)and the US in the 1950s (van Dijk, 1993). This study seeks to understand the discursive constructions of the Other, because in its definition and characterization, the Other (the homosexual) was described, portrayed, and presented as a stranger who was different and unwanted in both historical contexts (Bauman, 1993). Through critical discourse analysis (CDA) as the methodological and analytical frameWork of this study, I collected and analyzed written and spoken texts that represent a significant sample of moderate mainstream politicians, neWspapers, and education texts for both historical contexts. The analysis of the collected data demonstrates that in both contexts the discursive construction of the Other mostly relied on stereotypical notions of homosexuals. However, there were differences betWeen the institutional and political approaches against homosexuals in the tWo societies in terms of levels of homophobia. Persecution (i.e., medicalization, criminalization, dehumanization, and extermination) and the use of rhetorical devices largely depended on the sociopolitical structures of each nation (e.g., democracy versus dictatorship). At the same time, there were also similarities, as both societies needed to rely on iii pseudoscientific information to legitimize institutional, social, and violent homophobia and to persuade their citizens to turn against homosexuals. iv DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to all the individuals Who Were victims of hatred and homophobic acts in Nazi Germany and the pre-StoneWall US. During these historical eras, many men were subject to persecution, incarceration, and extermination simply for being homosexuals. I also dedicate this dissertation to my loving and caring mother, Who instilled in me the important values of perseverance and resilience. She also supported me during the most challenging moments as I worked towards my PhD. This milestone is specially dedicated to her for all her efforts in supporting me to achieve this degree. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to acknowledge the support from York University and Freie Universität for funding my journey as a PhD student in Canada and in Germany. It would have not been possible to achieve this important goal in my life without the support from these tWo institutions. I want to thank Dr. Sandra Schecter not only providing me with the necessary feedback to continue my academic journey as a PhD student, but also for giving me significant lessons about the life of a scholar. I am also very thankful that Dr. Schecter has demonstrated continuous support to help me secure job opportunities since I started this process with her and for supporting me to move to Berlin as part of my research process. Thanks to Dr. Didi Khayatt and Dr. Laura Wiseman for their invaluable advice. I am very thankful to Dr. UWe Gellert, my supervisor at Freie Universität, for his support and guidance during my stay in Berlin. Special thanks to Loretta Fiorini for her guidance and help with all the logistics of my PhD process. And thanks to: • Benedict Gudrich for his patience and support translating all the German documents into English; • Sara Potkonjak and her loving family for offering me support when I needed it the most; • Bibiana Benavides for her advice and for alWays cheering me on to keep going. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii Dedication ...................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Historical OvervieW .................................................................................................................... 2 Homosexuality: Definition ...................................................................................................... 3 Sodomy and Anti-Homosexuality LaWs: Historical OvervieW .............................................. 4 Homosexuality in Germany .................................................................................................... 6 Homosexuality in the United States ........................................................................................ 8 The Lavender Scare .............................................................................................................. 10 The Kinsey Report ................................................................................................................ 11 Significance of the Study ......................................................................................................... 12 On the Use of Terminology in This Dissertation ...................................................................... 14 Summary and Dissertation Outline ........................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2: Conceptual FrameWorks .............................................................................................. 19 Discursive Construction of Hate ........................................................................................... 19 Discursive Discrimination and Elite Discourse .................................................................... 20 Theoretical Dimensions of Discrimination ........................................................................... 23 Linguistic Strategies of Hate ................................................................................................. 24 Mental Structures, Beliefs, and Ideologies ........................................................................... 25 Bauman: The Texture of Hatred and Dehumanization ............................................................ 27 The Normalization of Hatred ................................................................................................ 28 Dehumanizing the Other ...................................................................................................... 30 Defining the Other ............................................................................................................... 31 Aliens Versus Neighbors ..................................................................................................... 32 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 35 Chapter 3: Literature RevieW ........................................................................................................ 36 Hate Speech and Homophobic Discourse ................................................................................ 36 Hate Speech: Definition ....................................................................................................... 36 Implications of Hate Speech ................................................................................................ 37 vii Homophobic Discourse ........................................................................................................ 38 Masculinity and Stereotyping ................................................................................................... 42 Stereotyping ......................................................................................................................... 42 Discourse, Identity and Categorization ................................................................................ 44 Gender Stereotypes .............................................................................................................. 45 Homosexual Stereotypes ...................................................................................................... 46 Discourse and the Construction of Hate .................................................................................. 47 Metaphors and Hate Speech ................................................................................................. 47 Identifying and Analyzing Metaphors ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 32. Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police (Part I) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1961 This finding aid has been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as RG 242, Microfilm Publication T175. To order microfilm, write to the Publications Sales Branch (NEPS), National Archives and Records Service (GSA), Washington, DC 20408. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-9982 AMERICA! HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE fOR THE STUDY OP WAR DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECOBDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXAM)RIA, VA. No* 32» Records of the Reich Leader of the SS aad Chief of the German Police (HeiehsMhrer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei) 1) THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION (AHA) COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF WAE DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA* This is part of a series of Guides prepared
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Origins of National Socialism
    With a new introduction by the author The Scientific Origins of National Socialism Ernst Haeckel f*_. 'ii a Daniel Gasman The Scientific Origins of National Socialism Daniel Gasman With a new introduction by the author 2004 [ 1971] 0 Transaction Publishers New Brunswick (U.S.A.) and London (U.K.) Contents List of Plates ix Introduction to the Transaction Edition xi Preface xxxiii Introduction: Ernst Haeckel and the Volkish Tradition xxxv 1. Ernst Haeckel and the German MonistLeague 1 2 . The Political Assumptions of Monism 31 3. Monism and Christianity 55 4• Monism, the Corporative State and Eugenics 82 5. Monism and Marxism 106 6 . Monism, Imperialism, and the FirstWorld War 126 7. Monism and National Socialism 147 Selected Bibliography 183 Index 203 List oj Plates Frontispiece E r n s t H a e c k e l a t e ig h t y : t h e v o l k is h p r o p h e t . Reproduced from the journal o f the Monist League, Das monistische Jahrhundert. Appearing between pages 8 and 9 I. A POSTER ANNOUNCING A LECTURE ON EVOLUTION TO BE DELIVERED IN BERLIN BY HAECKEL. Reproduced from Peter Klemm, Der Ketzer von Jena, Leipzig: Urania, 1968. II. A GNARLED EVOLUTIONARY TREE DRAWN BY HAECKEL. Reproduced from Peter Klemm, Der Ketzer von Jenat Leipzig: Urania, 1968. III. ILLUSTRATION OF BIZARRE BOTANICAL SPECIMENS. Reproduced from Haeckel’s Kunstformen der Natur, Leipzig: Verlag des Biblio- graphischen Instituts, 1899- 1904. IV. (a) A d e t a il f r o m g u s t a v e m o r e a u ’ s Galatea.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction THE PARTICIPANTS The Men of the Wannsee Conference Hans-Christian Jasch and Christoph Kreutzmüller On 20 January 1942 senior German officials came together for a meet- ing, to be followed by breakfast, in a grand villa overlooking Lake Wannsee to discuss the “Final Solution to the Jewish Question”1 in Europe. What sort of men were they? This is what most visitors to the House of the Wannsee Conference Memorial and Educational Site ask themselves when they visit the former dining room where the meeting very likely took place.2 This volume sets out to provide answers. Inevitably, they will not be exhaustive answers. While the Wannsee Conference has come to be seen as key (and sometimes even as a cipher) to the bureaucratically orchestrated mass murder of European Jews, its participants have not.3 The fifteen men who attended the Wannsee Conference will be profiled in this volume in readable, concise chapters based on primary sources and intense research. Our goal is to convey a distinct sense of these men with in-depth biographical detail, associations and references. We hope that our volume will contribute to research into Nazi perpetrators,4 which has been a valuable addition to Holocaust research and is a cen- tral element of the Memorial’s educational agenda.5 We also hope the volume provides a glimpse into the private and professional networks of the officials who worked in the offices on Berlin’s Wilhelmstraße and whom research has so far neglected.6 Who were the conference participants? We must start by stating the obvious: there were no women among them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antd-Tobacco Campaign Ofthe Nazis: a Little Known Aspect of Public Health in Germany, 1933-45
    The antd-tobacco campaign ofthe Nazis: a little known aspect of public health in Germany, 1933-45 Robert N Proctor Historians and epidemiologists have only recently propaganda. In a pattern that would become familiar in begun to explore the Nazi anti-tobacco movement. the United States and elsewhere after the second world Germany had the world's strongest antismoking war, several of these journals tried to dismiss the movement in the 1930s and early 1940s, encom- anti-tobacco movement as "fanatic" and "unscientific." passing bans on smoking in public spaces, bans on One such journal featured the German word for science advertising, restrictions on tobacco rations for twice in its title (Der Tabak: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift women, and the world's most refined tobacco epi- der Internationalen Tabakwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft, demiology, linking tobacco use with the already founded in 1940). evident epidemic oflung cancer. The anti-tobacco We should also realise that tobacco provided an campaign must be understood against the back- important source ofrevenue for the national treasury. In drop ofthe Nazi quest for racial and bodily purity, 1937-8 German national income from tobacco taxes which also motivated many other public health and tariffs exceeded 1 billion Reichsmarks.'2 By 1941, efforts ofthe era. as a result of new taxes and the annexation of Austria and Bohemia, Germans were paying nearly twice that. Medical historians in recent years have done a great According to Germany's national accounting office, by deal to enlarge our understanding ofmedicine and pub- 1941 tobacco taxes constituted about one twelfth ofthe lic health in Nazi Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Educational Needs for Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Pakistan
    The Anti-tobacco Movement of Nazi Germany Aboul-Enein The Anti-tobacco Movement of Nazi Germany: A Historiographical Re-Examination Basil Aboul-Enein, MSc, MPH, MA1 Author1 is affiliated with San Jacinto College, Department of Dietetic Technology. Contact author: Basil Aboul- Enein, San Jacinto College, Department of Dietetic Technology, 8060 Spencer Hwy, Pasadena, TX 77501; Phone: 832-894-4294; Email: [email protected] Submitted May 31, 2012; Revised and Accepted October 24, 2012 Abstract Introduction: The infamy of Nazi medical research conjures up images of horrific experiments in the concentration camps and SS (Schutzstaffel) doctors like Josef Mengele. However, the anti-smoking campaign of Nazi Germany is perhaps one of the least examined aspects of public health history and state sponsored anti-tobacco advocacy. Nazi public health activism was involved in work that may provide insight relevant to current public health issues. Purpose: This article examined the current literature that discusses the anti-smoking campaigns of Nazi Germany, explored the phenomenon of quality medical research under the banner of National Socialism, and shed light into a forgotten aspect of Nazi medical history. Findings: Previous authors have suggested that the Nazi war on cancer and the contributions made by Nazi public health activists were one of the most aggressive public health movements in the world. Marked with a certain level of ambivalence, these aggressive campaigns against smoking were less concerned with the universal dimensions of public health practices and ethics than they were towards a pursuit of a lifestyle that was worthy of a ‘master race.’ Keywords: Public health, Nazi Germany, smoking, cancer, tobacco International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2012; 15:166-172 The Anti-tobacco Movement of Nazi Germany Aboul-Enein a core of principles for the Nazi platform including Introduction 8 support for public health efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Public Health
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Public Health. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 1. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Public Health. 2008 May ; 122(5): 497±505. Tobacco policies in Nazi Germany: not as simple as it seems Eleonore Bachinger, Martin McKee*, and Anna Gilmore London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK Summary Objective—Reluctance to develop effective tobacco control measures in Germany has been attributed to the anti-smoking stance taken by the Nazis, which has encouraged pro-smoking groups to equate tobacco control advocacy with totalitarianism. This paper reassesses the scale and nature of tobacco control in Germany during the Third Reich. Design—Analysis of documents and reports about the situation in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s supplemented by a review of Reich legal ordinances, party newspapers, health behaviour guidelines issued by Nazi party organizations, and interviews with expert informants. Results—While there was considerable opposition to smoking in Nazi Germany, there was no consistent Nazi policy to combat smoking, and what did exist built on pre-existing policies. Although extreme measures were taken in isolated localities or by overzealous party members, there was a marked ambivalence to tobacco control at the highest levels. Many policies were contradictory; measures were often not enforced, and cigarettes were actively distributed to ‘deserving’ groups. Conclusion—Policies on tobacco in Nazi Germany are much more complex than is often represented by those who invoke them to condemn those seeking to reduce the burden of disease caused by smoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Johann Von Leers Und Die „Faschistische Internationale“ Der Fünfziger Und Sechziger Jahre in Argentinien Und Ägypten
    Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 59. Jahrgang 2011 Heft 6 Martin Finkenberger Johann von Leers und die „faschistische Internationale“ der fünfziger und sechziger Jahre in Argentinien und Ägypten Im August 1957 veröffentlichte die Wochenzeitschrift Frankfurter Illustrierte eine Serie reißerischer Reportagen. Unter dem Titel „SS-Treffpunkt Kairo“ berichtete ein Re- porter, den die Redaktion an den Nil geschickt hatte, in schrillen Tönen über ehemalige Natio nalsozialisten und Angehörige von SS und SD, die sich angeblich in großer Zahl in Ägypten aufhielten und dort „eine Art kleine Filiale des Dritten Reiches“ bildeten. Ihre Anwerbung sei, wollte der Reporter herausgefunden haben, durch Agenten der Sowjet- union erfolgt, die seinerzeit enge Beziehungen zu Präsident Nasser unterhielten und diesen in seiner Politik gegen Israel unterstützten. In Militärkreisen und im Propagan- daapparat nähmen sie Schlüsselpositionen ein und setzten dort ihr bis 1945 ausgeübtes Handwerk nahtlos fort. Bei einem von ihnen handele es sich um Johann von Leers, der bis Kriegsende als Professor an der „Universität Breslau“ gelehrt habe und jetzt unter dem Namen „Euler“ in Ägypten wirke. Seine Aufgabe bestehe darin, „sich an dem Auf- bau eines ägyptischen Nationalsozialismus zu beteiligen“ – unter anderem als „Leiter“ von „Radio Kairo“, das „Attacken im besten Goebbelsstil“ gegen den Westen und jene arabischen Nationen verbreite, die sich dem Führungsanspruch Nassers nicht unterwer- fen wollten. Dies alles sei „Teil des großen Plans, die Sowjetunion zur neuen Macht im Nahen Osten zu machen“.1 Die Frankfurter Illustrierte – die es schon lange nicht mehr gibt – war nicht ohne Einfluss. Sie erschien wöchentlich in einer Auflage von mehreren hunderttausend Exem- plaren. Der hier zitierte Beitrag war freilich eine krude Mischung weniger Fakten und 1 SS-Treffpunkt Kairo, in: Frankfurter Illustrierte Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Definitive Work on a Sordid Affair 1900, “No Competent Scientist Had Defended Them for Decades” (P
    BOOK REVIEWS || JOURNAL OF CREATION 29(3) 2015 The definitive work on a sordid affair 1900, “no competent scientist had defended them for decades” (p. 262). One common source of the biogenetic Haeckel’s Embryos: Images, law drawings, including the illustration Evolution, and Fraud on the cover of Hopwood’s book, was Nick Hopwood Romanes, which was credited to 3 The University of Chicago Press, 2015 ‘Häckel’ on pages 152–153. Hopwood examined both how and why Haeckel made his drawings, and their exploitation to prove Darwinism Jerry Bergman true for over a century after they were first published. His detailed detective rofessor Ernst Haeckel work even included researching the P(1834–1919) is most well known Haeckel archives in Jena, evaluating late as 1997.6 A fuzzy illustration for his drawings that supported his the original drawings, as well as the of the embryo drawings even made ‘biogenetic law’, the idea that embryos woodblocks that were used to print the cover of the 9 December 2010 and fetuses of higher-level organisms his embryo illustrations and other issue of Nature magazine7 (p. 297) passed through the evolutionary stages pictures. The result was, according without acknowledging any of their when developing in the mother’s to a book review by Matthew problems, even though, as a review 1 womb. Later, the drawings were Cobb, Professor4 of Zoology at the of Hopwood’s book published in New used to argue for an evolutionary University of Manchester, UK, that Scientist proclaimed, they were “drawn- phylotypic stage, where embryos of it is “embarrassing but true: some out lies”.8 Another example which used different vertebrate classes supposedly of the most influential drawings in the illustrations without noting any resemble one another very closely at the history of biology are wrong, of their major problems was the 1997 a certain stage of development, sup- exaggerated to fit a thesis”.5 Cobb textbook by Gerhard and Kirchner.9 posedly supporting common ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Gasman
    Ernst Haeckel’s Alleged Tragic Sense of Life and Other Fantasies: a Review of Robert J. Richards' biography of Haeckel -- The Tragic Sense of Life -- by Daniel Gasman. Scholars who denigrate Haeckel compared to Darwin are "miscreant historians."1 - Robert J. Richards Peter D. Smith’s misguided review in the London Times Literary Supplement [TLS: 7/25/08, pp.12-13] of Robert J. Richards, The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought [University of Chicago Press, 2008], is apparently the unwitting evaluation of a trusting author possessing only limited knowledge of the subject matter and a disturbing unawareness of the extensive body of recent writing and discussion about Haeckel. Notwithstanding Smith’s reverential evaluation, Richards’ biography is actually an elaborate distortion and at times even a fabrication, a work that relentlessly challenges the demands of accuracy in its portrayal of the life and thought of the biologist Ernst Haeckel and the general meaning of Haeckel’s evolutionary science in Nineteenth Century Germany. Richards manipulates his portrayal of Haeckel to such an extent that more often than not only a fictionalized figure emerges, unrecognizable from what is commonly known about Haeckel and his science and philosophy of Monism. 1 Richards’ comment appears on the book jacket of Sander Gliboff, H.G. Bronn, Ernst Haeckel, and the Origins of German Darwinism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2008. In a review of Richard’s biography of Haeckel, Professor Gliboff reinforces all the errors that appear in Richards’ book. Scientific American, Vol. 97 (1), January-February2009, 68. 1 Among his enthusiastic, but unfounded evaluations, Smith suggests that Richards has successfully severed the link between Haeckel and Nazism and has definitively ‘misplaced Gasman’s’ hypothesis of such a connection.2 But Smith’s naiveté and Richards’ claims in this regard carry no weight because they rest on untenable historical assumptions and imagined source material.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Berger ­ Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Hans Berger from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    4/12/2016 Hans Berger ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hans Berger From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hans Berger (21 May 1873 – 1 June 1941) was a German psychiatrist, best known as the inventor of Hans Berger electroencephalography (EEG) (the recording of "brain waves") in 1924, coining the name,[1] and the discoverer of the alpha wave rhythm known as "Berger's wave". Contents 1 Biography Hans Berger 2 Research 3 Hans­Berger­Preis Born 21 May 1873 4 See also Neuses, Saxe­Coburg and Gotha, 5 Sources German Empire 5.1 Notes 5.2 Print Died 1 June 1941 (aged 68) 5.3 Online Jena, Germany 6 Further reading Suicide 7 External links Nationality Germany Fields Psychiatry Biography Alma mater University of Jena Known for Electroencephalograms Berger was born in Neuses (now part of Coburg), Saxe­ Coburg and Gotha, Germany. After attending Casimirianum, where he gained his abitur in 1892, Berger enrolled as a mathematics student at the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena with a view to becoming an astronomer. After one semester, he abandoned his studies and enlisted for a year of service in the cavalry. During a training exercise, his horse suddenly reared and he landed in the path of a horse­drawn cannon. The driver of the artillery battery halted the horses in time, leaving the young Berger shaken but with no serious injuries.[2] His sister, at home many kilometres away, had a feeling he was in danger and insisted their father telegram him. The incident made such an impression on Berger that, years later in 1940, he wrote: “It was a case
    [Show full text]
  • Thuringian Articles About National History
    Fritz Sauckel (1894-1946) At dawn on October 16th, 1946 at Nuremberg’s prison, the execution of Fritz Sauckel was carried out, a man whose career as a leading NSDAP-official (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) had begun 20 years earlier in 1927 with his appointment as Thuringia’s Gauleiter, the leader of the Nazi district in that region. By 1930, Sauckel was able to lead the nationalist splinter party to becoming the first to participate in governing in a German district. Another two and a half years later he was able to achieve the “preponed takeover of power” as the head of the government. With Hitler coming to power 1933, Sauckel, a Northern-Bavarian by birth, rose to Reichstatthalter (imperial governor) in Thuringia and make his district into a strong regional power. In this way and thanks to personal connections, he increased his position of power within the polycratic “land of the Führer”. When he became “the general commissioner of the labor effort” in 1942, this was the most obvious expression of the power of the so-called “Gaufürst” or “district prince”. This position led to Sauckel becoming the “biggest and cruellest slave owner since the Egyptian pharaohs” (Robert H. Jackson, main prosecutor during the Nuremberg trials). Sauckel had six million forced labourers deported to Germany, which was the crucial factor in his being sentenced to death by hanging. Ernst Friedrich Sauckel was born on October 27th, 1894 in the Northern- Bavarian town of Haßfurt. As the son of a post office employee and a seamstress, he was of lower middle class origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation and Continuity in the History of Universities
    The Theological Faculty of the University of Jena during the Third Reich Susannah Heschel Eli Black Professor of Jewish Studies Dartmouth College Hanover, NH 03755 USA Official Nazi policies of Gleichschaltung were applied to most of the major institutions of German society, but not to the church, nor to the theological faculties at German universities. Theirs was an optional, voluntary Gleichschaltung, carried out to a greater or lesser degree depending upon the political leanings of the faculty members and regional church officials. While no systematic survey by historians has been undertaken to evaluate the range of responses to National Socialism, some conclusions have been drawn that do not bear out the situation at Jena, which is known to have been particularly Nazified, nor of equally suspicious theological faculties, including those of Breslau, Göttingen, Heidelberg, Tübingen, and Vienna. For example, Trutz Rendtorff argues that "troz aller zeitbedingten Arrangements eine relativ zur politischen Umwelt sich durchhaltende autonome Wissenschaftskultur gibt, die nicht zuletzt in der Theologie objektive Massstäbe gegen weltanschauliche Einflussnahmen zu bewahren vermag... Generell kann man urteilen, dass der Nationalsozialismus aus sich heraus, keine originaere eigene und der Selbständigkeit fähige Wissenschaftskultur erzeugt hat." 1 Similarly, Kurt Meier claims that “Es hat in der Universitätstheologie zwar vereinzelt problematische Anpassungsstrategien an das NS-Weltanschauungskonglomerat gegeben, die vorwiegend apologetischen Interessen
    [Show full text]