DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan Appleton (Me.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan Appleton (Me.) The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 6-12-2007 Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan Appleton (Me.). Comprehensive Plan Committee Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs Repository Citation Appleton (Me.). Comprehensive Plan Committee, "Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan" (2007). Maine Town Documents. 14. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs/14 This Plan is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Town Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan June 12, 2007 St. George River Prepared by the Appleton Comprehensive Plan Committee This page intentionally left blank Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan 6/12/2007 Rev. Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction and Executive Summary ................................................................ 7 Section 2 History............................................................................................................... 12 Section 3 Population ......................................................................................................... 18 Section 4 Economy ........................................................................................................... 24 Section 5 Housing............................................................................................................. 35 Section 6 Transportation................................................................................................... 46 Section 7 Fiscal Capacity.................................................................................................. 55 Section 8 Public Facilities and Services ........................................................................... 61 Section 9 Capital Improvement Plan ................................................................................ 72 Section 10 Natural Resources ........................................................................................... 75 Section 11 Recreational Resources................................................................................... 97 Section 12 Land Use ....................................................................................................... 103 Section 13 Regional Coordination.................................................................................. 115 Section 14 Survey Results .............................................................................................. 120 Appendix A - Maps......................................................................................................... 127 Map 1 - Location......................................................................................................... 128 Map 2 – Transportation Network................................................................................ 129 Map 3 – Transportation Safety ................................................................................... 130 Map 4 – Topography................................................................................................... 131 Map 5 – Public Facilities ............................................................................................ 132 Map 6 – Prime Farmland Soils ................................................................................... 133 Map 7 – Hydric Soils .................................................................................................. 134 Map 8 – Soil Suitability for Low Density Development ............................................ 135 Map 9 – Critical Habitat ............................................................................................. 136 Map 10 – Water Resources ......................................................................................... 137 Map 11 – Land Cover ................................................................................................. 138 Map 12 – Existing Land Use ...................................................................................... 139 Map 13 – Shoreland Zoning ....................................................................................... 140 Map 14 – Historic Places ............................................................................................ 141 Map 15 – Proposed Land Use ..................................................................................... 142 Appendix B – Capital Improvement Plan....................................................................... 143 Page 3 of 145 Town of Appleton Comprehensive Plan 6/12/2007 Rev. Table of Tables Table 3-1: Appleton Historical Population....................................................................... 18 Table 3-2: Population Change by Decade ........................................................................ 18 Table 3-3: Appleton Population Predictions..................................................................... 19 Table 3-4: Age Group Distribution in 2000...................................................................... 19 Table 3-5: Appleton Age Distribution Trends.................................................................. 20 Table 3-6: Appleton Population by Gender ...................................................................... 20 Table 3-7: Household Size Comparison ........................................................................... 21 Table 3-8: Household Numbers Comparison ................................................................... 21 Table 3-9: Appleton Households by Type ........................................................................ 21 Table 3-10: Total School Enrollment ............................................................................... 22 Table 3-11: Public School Enrollment of Appleton Residents......................................... 22 Table 3-12: Educational Attainment................................................................................. 22 Table 4-1 Median Household Income............................................................................... 24 Table 4-2 Income Distribution in 1999: 2000 Census...................................................... 24 Table 4-3 Income Type in 1999........................................................................................ 25 Table 4-4 Poverty Status in 1999...................................................................................... 26 Table 4-5 Labor Force Status: 2000.................................................................................. 26 Table 4-6 Employment Characteristics in 2000................................................................ 27 Table 4-7 Employment Characteristics in 1990................................................................ 28 Table 4-8 Employers in Appleton (2003-04).................................................................... 29 Table 4-9 Major Employers in Knox County ................................................................... 30 Table 4-10 Major Employers in Waldo County ............................................................... 30 Table 4-11 Workplace of Appleton Residents.................................................................. 31 Table 4-12 Commuting Method - 2000 ............................................................................ 31 Table 4-13 Taxable Sales (in thousands of dollars) for Appleton .................................... 32 Table 4-14 Total Taxable Sales by Sector in Thousands of Dollars for Knox County .... 32 Table 5-1 Total Housing Units ......................................................................................... 35 Table 5-2 Appleton Housing Predictions.......................................................................... 35 Table 5-3 Housing Units in Structure ............................................................................... 36 Table 5-4 Year Structure Built.......................................................................................... 36 Table 5-5 Total Appleton Housing Building Permits Issued............................................ 37 Table 5-6 Home Construction in Appleton....................................................................... 37 Table 5-7 Appleton Housing Characteristics in 2000....................................................... 37 Table 5-8 Housing Occupancy and Tenure ...................................................................... 38 Table 5-9 Appleton Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units ...................................... 39 Table 5-10 Appleton Specified Renter-Occupied Housing Units..................................... 39 Table 5-11 Housing Affordability by Income in Appleton 2003 ..................................... 40 Table 5-12 Appleton Households: Monthly Owner Costs in 1999................................... 41 Table 5-13 2003 Housing Affordability ........................................................................... 41 Table 5-14 Median Home Sale Prices in Appleton .......................................................... 42 Table 5-15 Appleton Age of Householders in 2000 ......................................................... 43 Table 6-1 Appleton Roadway Inventory........................................................................... 47 Table 6-2 Commuting Methods of Appleton Residents ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine
    Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine By Pamela J. Lombard and Glenn A. Hodgkins Prepared in cooperation with the Maine Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5099 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lombard, P.J., and Hodgkins, G.A., 2008, Comparison of observed and predicted abutment scour at selected bridges in Maine: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5099, 23 p., available only online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5099. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • United States National Museum
    * si 'a*»/ ^ ^ l^// kh < (M->'^^'' ^eparfrrxenf of fhc inferior: U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM. 21 BULLETIN UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. NO. 18.—EXHIBIT OF THE FISHERIES AND FISH CULTURE OP THE ^^^ —-UNITED STATES OF AMERfCA. MADE AT BERLIN IN 1880. PREPARED UXDEU THE DIRECTION OF a. BROA^^ls^ ooode, DEPUTY COiTMISSIONEE. WASHINGTON: aOVFiRNMENT PETNTTNG- OFFICJE 18 80. '^epavimeni of ihc 55nfcrior U. a. NATIONAL MUSEUM. 21 BULLETIN unu'ei) states national museum. No. 18. PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1880. ADYEETISEMENT. This work is the twenty-first of a series of papers intended to illnstrate the collections of natural history and ethnology belonging- to the United States, and constituting the i^ational Museum, of which the Smithsonian Institution was placed in charge by the act of Congress of August 10, 1846. It has been prepared at the request of the Smithsonian Institution, and printed by authority of the honorable Secretary of the Interior. SPEXCER F. BAIRD, Secretary of the Snuthsonian Institution. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, March 29, 1880. INTERNATIONAL FISHERY EXHIBITION, BERLIN, 1880. EXHIBIT THE FISHERIES AND FISH CULTlIPiE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONALE FISCHEEEI-AUSSTELLUNG, HELD AT BERLIN, APRIL 20, 1880, AND FORMING A PART OF THE COL- LECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEmi, MADE BY THE UNITED STATES FISH COMMISSION. PKEPARED UNDEU THE DIRECTION OI' a. BIlo^^^]s^ aooDE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONEK. WASHINGTOIT: <3-OVEENMENT FEINTING OFPIOE. 1880. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section A.—AQUATIC ANIMALS AND PLANTS OF NOKTH AMERICA BENE- FICIAL OR INJURIOUS TO MAN. VERTEBKATES. Page. I. Mammals 1 1. Ferae (carnivores) 1 Fissipedia (laud carnivores) 1 Piunipedia (seals, Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 American Canal Society
    National Canal Museum Archives Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton PA 18042 610-923-3548 x237 – [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- American Canal Society – Stephen M. Straight Collection, 1964-1984 2000.051 Stephen M. Straight was apparently an amateur historian who collected material relating to North American canals, primarily in the New England area. His collection was given to Stetson University, which sent it on to the American Canal Society. The ACS then sent it to the National Canal Museum. Extent: 2/3 linear feet Box 1: Folder 0: Miscellaneous Correspondence • Letter from Sims D. Kline, director, DuPont-Ball Library, Stetson University, to American Canal Society (ACS) re: Stephen M. Straight material. 3-20-98. • Letter from ACS (William H. Shank, publisher, American Canals) to Sims D. Kline re: Stephen M. Straight material. 11-16-98. Folder 1: New England Canals, Book One • “America’s First Canal,” by Edward Rowe Snow, and “America’s First Canal Mural Series,” Yankee, March 1966. • “New England’s Forgotten Canal,” by Prescott W. Hall, Yankee, March 1960. • Letter from R. G. Knowlton, vice president, Concord Electric Company, to Stephen M. Straight (SS) • Xerox copies from Lyford’s History of Concord, N.H., pp. 9, 340-41, 839-40. • Letter from Elizabeth B. Know, corresponding secretary, The New London County Historical Society, New London, CT, to SS. • Editorial by Eric Sloane. Unknown source. • Typed notes (2 pages) from History of Concord, N.H., vol. II, 1896, pp. 832-40. • Letter from Augusta Comstock, Baker Memorial Library, Dartmouth College, to SS. • Xerox copies of map of Connecticut River, surveyed by Holmes Hutchinson, 1825.
    [Show full text]
  • Alasmidonta Varicosa) Version 1.1.1
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Brook Floater (Alasmidonta varicosa) Version 1.1.1 Molunkus Stream, Tributary of the Mattawamkeag River in Maine. Photo credit: Ethan Nedeau, Biodrawversity. Inset: Adult brook floaters. Photo credit: Jason Mays, USFWS. July 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service This document was prepared by Sandra Doran of the New York Ecological Services Field Office with assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Brook Floater Species Status Assessment (SSA) Team. The team members include Colleen Fahey, Project Manager (Species Assessment Team (SAT), Headquarters (HQ) and Rebecca Migala, Assistant Project Manager, (Region 1, Regional Office), Krishna Gifford (Region 5, Regional Office), Susan (Amanda) Bossie (Region 5 Solicitor's Office, Julie Devers (Region 5, Maryland Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Jason Mays (Region 4, Asheville Field Office), Rachel Mair (Region 5, Harrison Lake National Fish Hatchery), Robert Anderson and Brian Scofield (Region 5, Pennsylvania Field Office), Morgan Wolf (Region 4, Charleston, SC), Lindsay Stevenson (Region 5, Regional Office), Nicole Rankin (Region 4, Regional Office) and Sarah McRae (Region 4, Raleigh, NC Field Office). We also received assistance from David Smith of the U.S. Geological Survey, who served as our SSA Coach. Finally, we greatly appreciate our partners from Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada, the Brook Floater Working Group, and others working on brook floater conservation. Version 1.0 (June 2018) of this report was available for selected peer and partner review and comment. Version 1.1 incorporated comments received on V 1.0 and was used for the Recommendation Team meeting. This final version, (1.1.1), incorporates additional comments in addition to other minor editorial changes including clarifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighthouses on the Coast of Maine Sixty-Seven Lighthouses Still Perch High on the Rocky Cliffs of Maine
    ™ Published since 1989 Where, when, and how to discover the best nature 116 photography in America Number 116 - October 2010 Cape Neddick Light - 62 mm / 93 All captions are followed by the lens focal length used for each photograph - DX and FX full-frame cameras. Lighthouses on the Coast of Maine Sixty-seven lighthouses still perch high on the rocky cliffs of Maine. Some of these lighthouses were built more than two hundred years ago to help sailors navigate their way through storms, fog, and dark of night. These beacons saved wooden merchant vessels sailing dangerous courses through narrow and shallow channels filled with countless hazards. Maine’s lighthouses were a part of our country’s history at a time when we were defending our shores, as far back as the Revolutionary war. Some were damaged by war and many were destroyed by the violence of nature. Light keepers risked their own lives to keep their lamps burning. A proud and dramatic beauty can be seen in these structures and their rugged environments–the reason I recently returned to Maine for another photo exploration. Issue 116 - page 2 You can fly into local airports like Portland or Whaleback Light Bangor, but fares are better and flights are more 43˚ 03’ 30” N frequent into Boston. You may want to rent a car 70˚ 41’ 48” W with a satellite navigation system or bring your From U.S. Route 1, drive east on State Route own portable GPS receiver. Just set your GPS 103 for 3.8 miles. Turn right onto Chauncey coordinates for the degrees/minutes/seconds Creek Road until you reach Pocahontas Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Integrated Freight Strategy Final Report, 2014 Maine Department of Transportation
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 6-2014 Maine Integrated Freight Strategy Final Report, 2014 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "Maine Integrated Freight Strategy Final Report, 2014" (2014). Transportation Documents. 102. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/102 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Integrated Freighht Strategy final report prepared for Maine Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 2014 www.camsys.com final report Maine Integrated Freight Strategy prepared for Maine Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, MA 02140 date June 2014 Maine Integrated Freight Strategy Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Current Freight System in Maine ......................................................................... 3 Freight-Related Programs and Investments ......................................................... 6 Key Trends Impacting the Freight System .......................................................... 6 Key Issues and
    [Show full text]
  • Salmo Salar) in the United States
    Status Review for Anadromous Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) in the United States Atlantic Salmon Biological Review Team Clem Fay, Penobscot Nation, Department of Natural Resources Meredith Bartron, USFWS, Northeast Fishery Center Scott Craig, USFWS, Maine Fisheries Resource Office Anne Hecht, USFWS, Ecological Services Jessica Pruden, NMFS, Northeast Region Rory Saunders (Chair), NMFS, Northeast Region Tim Sheehan, NMFS, Northeast Fisheries Science Center Joan Trial, Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission July 2006 Acknowledgements Clem Fay was a key member of the Atlantic Salmon Biological Review Team (BRT) until he passed away in October of 2005. His understanding of ecological processes was unrivaled, and his contributions to this document were tremendous. Since his passing preceded the publication of this Status Review, he was not able to see the completion of this project. We would also like to acknowledge Jerry Marancik’s early contributions to this project. He was a BRT member until he retired in the spring of 2004. At that time, Scott Craig assumed Jerry Marancik’s role on the BRT. We would also like to acknowledge the many people who contributed to the completion of this document. Primarily, the work of previous Atlantic Salmon BRTs helped form the basis of this document. Previous BRT members include M. Colligan, J. Kocik, D. Kimball, J. Marancik, J. McKeon, P. Nickerson, and D. Beach. Many other individuals contributed helpful comments, ideas, and work products including D. Belden, E. Cushing, R. Dill, N. Dube, M. Hachey, C. Holbrook, D. Kusnierz, P. Kusnierz, C. Legault, G. Mackey, S. MacLean, L. Miller, M. Minton, K. Mueller, J. Murphy, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fel UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maine NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES Knox
    fel UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maine NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Knox PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPH FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER (Type all entries - attach to or enclose with photograph) ttJZTW COMMON: George's River Canal AND/OR HISTORIC: General Knox Canal STREET AND NUMBER: River CITY OR TOWN: Warren PHOTO CREDIT-. State Park and Recreation Commission DATE OF PHOTO: 1970 NEGATIVE FILED AT: State House - Augusta , Maine DESCRIBE VIEW, DIRECTION, ETC. Photo #1. First rapids above tide water. Site of Guard Lock. No visible remains today. L, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maine COUNTY NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Knox PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPH FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY (Type all entries - attach to or enclose with photograph) ENTRY NUMBER COMMON: George ' s River Canal AND/OR HISTORIC: General Knox Canal ISTREET AND NUMBER-. Property up river from Warren,Maine~. Owned by Henry Conary. CITY OR TOWN: Warren Maine.. PHOTO CREDIT: State Park and Recreation Commissi DATE OF PHOTO: I?7C NEGATIVE FILED AT: State House - Augusta,Maine. DESCRIBE VIEW, DIRECTION, ETC. Southeast. Photo # 2. Upper end of first locks of the two built by Charles Barrett. Local name Knox Locks. * >, >; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maine COUNTY Kn()X NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPH FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY (Type all entries - attach to or enclose with photograph) ENTRY NUMBER DATE 75' iiiiiiilii^ :~?:*:"~->;::^$•/(£- OOtfO 3/3/70 COMMON: George's River Canal AND/OR HISTORIC-. General Knox Canal STREET AND NUMBER: property up river from Warren , Maine .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine
    Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine Final Report 2008 A Publication from the Maine Department of Transportation’s Research Division Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.08-04 2. 3. Recipient’s Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment 2008 Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Pamela J. Lombard and Glenn A. Hodgkins SIR 2008-5099 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey, Maine Division 11. Contract © or Grant (G) No. 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Maine DOT 16 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0016 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract (Limit 200 words) Maximum abutment-scour depths predicted with five different methods were compared to maximum abutment-scour depths observed at 100 abutments at 50 bridge sites in Maine with a median bridge age of 66 years. Prediction methods included the Froehlich/Hire method, the Sturm method, and the Maryland method published in Federal Highway Administration Hydraulic Engineering Circular 18 (HEC-18); the Melville method; and envelope curves. No correlation was found between scour calculated using any of the prediction methods and observed scour. Abutment scour observed in the field ranged from 0 to 6.8 feet, with an average observed scour of less than 1.0 foot. Fifteen of the 50 bridge sites had no observable scour. Equations frequently overpredicted scour by an order of magnitude and in some cases by two orders of magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Appleton Bog-Pettingill Swamp-Witcher Swamp
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Appleton Bog- Pettingill Swamp- Witcher Swamp Beginning with Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Habitat Appleton Bog-Pettingill Swamp-Witcher Swamp Biophysical Region • Central Maine Embayment WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? Rare Animals The three large wetlands that make up Appleton Bog, Creeper Witcher Swamp, and Pettingill Swamp represent rare and Upland Sandpiper exemplary examples of unpatterned fen, spruce- larch Rare Plants wooded bog, and Atlantic white cedar bog as well as one Atlantic White-cedar of the largest Atlantic white cedar swamps in the state. Because these wetlands function in part as headwaters Rare and Exemplary of the St. George River, this area also provides flood Natural Communities and water quality protection for the St. George River. Atlantic White Cedar Bog Atlantic White Cedar Swamp The proximity of the three large wetlands, and their Black Spruce Bog combined habitat diversity, suggest that they may be Red Maple Fen viewed as one large conservation entity. Unpatterned Fen Ecosystem OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION Significant Wildlife Habitats Inland Wading Bird and Waterfowl Habitat » Educate recreational users about the ecological and Deer Wintering Area economic benefits provided by the Focus Area. » Work with willing landowners to permanently protect remaining undeveloped areas. » Encourage town planners to improve approaches to development that may impact Focus Area functions. » Encourage best management practices for forestry, vegetation clearing, and soil disturbance activities. » Encourage landowners to maintain intact forested buf- fers along water bodies and wetlands. » Monitor and remove invasive plant populations. Public Access Opportunities For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning • Appleton Bog Preserve, TNC with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the U.S Atlantic Salmon
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE U.S. ATLANTIC SALMON ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE REPORT NO. 32 - 2019 ACTIVITIES Portland, Maine March 2 – 6, 2020 PREPARED FOR U.S. SECTION TO NASCO Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Description of Fisheries and By-catch in USA Waters ................................................................... 4 1.3 Adult Returns to USA Rivers .......................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Stock Enhancement Programs ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Tagging and Marking Programs .................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Farm Production ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.7 Smolt Emigration ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.8 References .................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Viability Assessment - Gulf of Maine Atlantic Salmon .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB Wo. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Androscoggin River Drainage Prehistoric Sites_____________________ B. Associated Historic Contexts ~~ Early and Middle Archaic Susquehanna Tradition Ceramic Period Early Contact Period C. Geographical Data The Androscoggin River Drainage Prehistoric Sites multiple property document encompasses those prehistoric sites located See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth [oJ36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and,Evaluation. Signature of certifying official Maine Historic Preservation ssion State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. Signature/jf the Keeper of the National Register Date NP8 Form 10-900* OMBAppmnlNo.
    [Show full text]