DOCSLIB.ORG

Portfolio of the South Baltic Projects: Part 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Portfolio of the South Baltic Projects: Part 2 Portfolio of the South Baltic projects: Part 2 Part-financed by the European Union (ERDF) 2.12.3 1.3 2.1 1.3 2.4 Going local. Meeting your needs. Connecting people and ideas. South Baltic co-operation network SWEDEN Sweden Lithuania Denmark Baltic Sea Germany Poland DENMARK LITHUANIA GERMANY POLAND Lead beneficiary Project partner Portfolio of the South Baltic projects: Part 2 3 Part-financed by the European Union (ERDF) Contents 5 Foreword 6 About the South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme 2007-2013 7 South Baltic Programme & EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region 1.1 Entrepreneurial Development 8 Eco4Life 9 RespEn 1.3 Transport accessibility 10 SB Global Access 11 INTERFACE PLUS 2.1 Management 12 DredgDikes of the Baltic Sea environment 13 MOMENT UP 2.2 Energy saving 14 WEBSR2 Upgrade and renewable energy 15 RES-CHAINS 2.3 Sustainable use of natural 16 Art Line and cultural heritage 17 Baltic Museums 2.0 Plus for regional development 18 RECReate 2.4 Local Community Initiatives 19 M.A.S.T 20 Wind up the barriers 21 Index of South Baltic Projects 22 Contacts 4 Part- financed by the European Union (ERDF) Going local. Meeting your needs. Connecting people and ideas. I am very pleased to present the publication that illustrates the 13 great ideas implemented under the South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme. By adding to this publication the 1st part of the Portfolio you will now get the full picture of the South Baltic projects supported during the 5 Calls for Proposals. The Programme is introducing the key actors – the projects. I hope that the successful implementa- tion of the cross border initiatives that are planned by the projects increases the competitiveness and enhance the integration among people and institutions of the regions in the five South Baltic countries. The co-operation between the regions situated along the coast of the southern part of the Baltic Sea has been developing significantly in the recent years. However there are still disparities between the regions covered by the Programme. Using the available assistance of the Programme, there are still possibilities to provide favourable conditions for growth and job creation over the national borders and to safeguard the favorable social, cultural and natural environment for the res- idents, tourists and investors in the South Baltic area. At present the important reference framework for the Programme is the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region that focuses on the main principle “Working in partnership to move from words to action”. It is expected that the overall coordination of actions across the policy areas will give bet- ter results than individual initiatives. Therefore, the South Baltic Programme seeks to contribute actively to the Stategy and is looking for projects adressing problems or creating opportunities indentified in the priority areas of the Action plan of the Strategy. I would like to highlight that the good feature of this Programme is a very close co-operation with projects during their preparation and implementation. There is also a possibility to use assistance of the external experts from the Capacity building project that supports participation in the Pro- gramme, in particular of the local authorities and NGOs. Therefore, after the next calls for propos- als that are planned in the future I believe that South Baltic Programme will turn the given opportu- nities into tangible results – into the improved quality of the life in the Programme regions. I believe, that the presented ideas will become a model for success of the cross border cooperation or will be an incentive for a generation of the new co-operation activities and partnerships. I wish the project partners to keep their enthusiasm for the future! Enjoy the reading! Deimante Jankunaite Head of Territorial Cooperation Programmes Division of Regional Policy Department in the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania (Chairperson of the Steering and Monitoring Committees of the South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme in 2010) 5 Part-financed by the European Union (ERDF) About the South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme 2007-2013 The South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme 2007-2013 is a multilateral cross-border cooperation pro- gramme created on the maritime borders between the south- ern Baltic Sea regions. It is a new cooperation area where cross-border cooperation structures have not been set at a full scale yet. The overall objective of the Programme is to strengthen the sustainable development of the South Baltic area through joint actions increasing its competitiveness and enhancing integration among people and institutions. The total budget of the Programme is 75 342 210 EUR (60 735 659 EUR – ERDF contribution). The eligible area of the Pro- gramme is indicated in the map. Eligible area of the Programme The brochure presents 13 projects approved during 2010 in the framework of 4th and 5th calls for proposals of the Programme. Priorities and measures of the Programme can be seen below. The number of projects belonging to each measure is indicat- ed in brackets. Priorities and measures of the South Baltic Programme I Economic competitiveness Sweden 1.1. Entrepreneurial development (2 projects) Lithuania 1.2. Integration of higher education and labour markets Denmark Baltic Sea 1.3. Transport accessibility (2 projects) Germany Poland II Attractiveness and common identity 2.1. Management of the Baltic Sea environment (2 projects) 2.2. Energy saving and renewable energy (2 projects) 2.3. Sustainable use of natural and cultural heritage for regional development (3 projects) 2.4. Local community initiatives (2 projects) 6 Part- financed by the European Union (ERDF) South Baltic Programme & EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region presents ways to I. To Make the Baltic Sea Region an Environmentally cooperate for implementing EU legislation and policy Sustainable Place instruments in a coordinated manner in all the coun- 1. To reduce nutrient inputs to the sea to acceptable tries of the region. Not only that, it also seeks to levels y enable a sustainable development, to enhance region’s 2. To preserve natural zones and biodiversity, prosperity and increase accessibility and attractiveness. including fisheries The EU SBSR focuses also on ensuring safety and 3. To reduce the use and impact of hazardous security in the Baltic Sea Region. substances 4. To become a model region for clean shipping This is the new way of working together in the Euro- 5. To mitigate and adapt to climate change y pean Union on each level to decrease the differences II. To Make the Baltic Sea Region a Prosperous Place between countries, to improve communication and to 6. To remove hindrances to the internal market develop the co-operation between the regions. in the Baltic Sea Region including to improve cooperation in the customs and tax area The Action Plan was developed as the implementation 7. To exploit the full potential of the region in tool for the EU SBSR. The Commission officially launched the research and innovation Strategy and its Action Plan on 10 June 2009. Since y 8. Implementing the Small Business Act: to promote this time the Strategy has been implemented within 15 entrepreneurship, strengthen SMEs and increase Priority Areas containing Flagship Projects introduced the efficient use of human resources in the Action Plan. The projects approved in the frame- y 9. To reinforce sustainability of agriculture, work of the South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation forestry and fisheries Programme 2007-2013 support some of the Priority Areas of the EU SBSR (marked y). III. To Make the Baltic Sea Region an Accessible and Attractive Place 10. To improve the access to, and the efficiency and security of the energy markets 11. To improve internal and external transport links y 12. To maintain and reinforce attractiveness of the Baltic Sea Region in particular through education, tourism and health y IV. To Make the Baltic Sea Region a Safe and Secure Place 13. To become a leading region in maritime safety and security 14. To reinforce protection from major emergen- cies at sea and on land y 15. To decrease the volume of, and harm done by, cross border crime. 7 Part-financed by the European Union (ERDF) 1.1 Entrepreneurial development Eco4Life – South Baltic Network for Environmental and Life Sciences to Boost Cross Border Cooperation (Eco4Life) © FikMik – Fotolia.com The overall idea of the project is to decrease existing differ- ences within the South Baltic area with regard of access to knowledge, technologies and development in the field of knowledge based bio economy (KBBE). There are three main strands of activities within the project: 1. Building up regional Eco4Life contact points in Klaipeda, Szczecin and Greifswald. They act as support structures and networks of cooperation between science and business in the eco-/bio-sector. 2. The joint elaboration of modular trainings for businesses and start-ups in the eco-/life-sector. They are based on regional needs and made available for other project regions. 3. An internationalisation of the regional Eco4Life networks and their integration into Baltic Sea Region ScanBalt struc- tures. For this purpose, three international conferences will take place in each of the involved regions. They serve as a vehicle for matchmaking of international business and sci- ence partners, and should initiate new enterprises in the sector. Experience from the best European and world lead- ing bio-regions shall be gathered through study visits to the Lead Beneficiary BioCon Valley GmbH (DE) Duration July 2010 – June 2013 Swedish bio-cluster in Lund and to the cradle of innovative Overall project budget _ 934 789,66 eco-/bio-industry (USA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diagnoza Ogólna Stanu Rozwoju Obszaru Metropolitalnego
    OPRACOWANIE STRATEGII ROZWOJU GDAŃSKIEGO OBSZARU METROPOLITALNEGO DO 2030 ROKU Diagnoza ogólna stanu rozwoju obszaru metropolitalnego Redakcja: Tomasz Brodzicki Krystyna Gawlikowska-Hueckel Tomasz Komornicki Gdańsk 2014 1 Spis treści 1. Wprowadzenie .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Kluczowe wnioski .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Najważniejsze ustalenia ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Kluczowe rekomendacje .................................................................................................................. 10 3. Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 16 3.1. Key findings ..................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2. Policy recommendations ................................................................................................................. 22 4. Ramy i zasadnicze wyzwania dla rozwoju Obszaru Metropolitalnego ............................................ 28 4.1. Ramy ogólne i uwarunkowania rozwoju Obszaru Metropolitalnego .............................................. 28 4.2. Zasadnicze problemy w rozwoju OM – drzewa problemów ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Responsibility 2016
    Our Responsibility 2016 1 OUR RESPONSIBILITY 2016 | ON THE ENERGA GROUP Table of contents On the Energa Group. .7 Distribution activity. 97 1.1. Our company. .8 4.1. Development of distribution activity as a strategic area . .98 1.2. Responsible and ethical governance . .19 4.2. Quality and security of energy supply . .101 1 1.3. Report as a tool for dialog with our stakeholders. .30 4 4.3. Investments in the distribution network. .107 Customers. 37 Employees . 113 2.1. Customer relations . .38 5.1. Responsible employer . .114 2 2.2. Energa-Obrót SA customer and products . .42 5 5.2. Our employees .. 116 2.3. Responsible sales process. 47 5.3. Health and safety . .121 2.4. Customer-oriented innovations . .54 5.4. Education and development. 125 5.5. Employee involvment in developing organizational culture. 128 Natural environment . 57 Local communities. 137 3.1. Environmental objectives in 2016 . 58 6.1. Responsibility to local communities as a strategic area . 138 3.2. Environmental management strategy. 60 6.2. Activities benefiting society . .140 3 3.3. Ecological energy from conventional and renewable sources . 89 6 6.3. Cooperation with public administration and heeding the voice of local 3.4. Investments in environmental protection . 91 communities. 153 3.5. Environmentally friendly innovative technologies . 93 6.4. Charitable activity . 162 GRI Table . .166 3 OUR RESPONSIBILITY 2016 | ON THE ENERGA GROUP 4 Dear Stakeholders, We would like to convey to you “Our Responsibility 2016” report summarizing the key achie- and charitable activities, which is confirmed by reinstituting the Energa Group to the stock vements of the Energa Group in sustainable development and corporate social responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Existing Treatment Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Inventory of existing treatment technologies in wastewater treatment plants Case studies in four coastal regions of the South Baltic Sea Poland, Sweden, Lithuania and Germany Project MORPHEUS 2017 - 2019 Deliverable 5.1 Lead Authors: Luczkiewicz A., Fudala-Ksiazek S., Jankowska K., Szopinska M. Gdansk University of Technology, Poland Co-authors: Björklund, E., Svahn, O., Kristianstad University, Sweden (Lead partner) Garnaga-Budrė G., Lithuanian EPA; Langas V., Klaipeda University, Lithuania Tränckner J., Kaiser A., University of Rostock, Germany Contact information: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Cover photo Lundåkraverket Landskrona Skåne, Sweden, © Erland Björklund Key facts of the MORPHEUS project MORPHEUS (Model Areas for Removal of Pharmaceutical Substances in the South Baltic) is a project financed by the European Union Interreg South Baltic Programme 36 months. The project duration is January 2017 – December 2019, with a total budget of EUR 1.6 million with a contribution from the European Regional Development Fund of EUR 1.3 million. The project has a total of 7 partners from four countries; Sweden, Germany, Poland and Lithuania: Kristianstad University (Lead Partner) – Sweden, EUCC – The Coastal Union Germany – Germany, University of Rostock – Germany, Gdansk Water Foundation – Poland, Gdansk University of Technology – Poland, Environmental Protection Agency – Lithuania and Klaipeda University – Lithuania. The project also has a total of 10 associated partners from these countries. For additional information on the project and activities please visit the MORPHEUS homepage at: www.morpheus-project.eu The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union, the Managing Authority or the Joint Secretariat of the South Baltic Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnoza Ogólna Stanu Rozwoju Obszaru Metropolitalnego Diagnoza Diagnoza Ogólna Stanu Rozwoju Sektorowa Obszaru Metropolitalnego
    Opracowanie strategii rozwoju Gdańskiego Obszaru Metropolitalnego do 2030 roku Diagnoza Diagnoza ogólna stanu rozwoju sektorowa obszaru metropolitalnego Tomasz Brodzicki, Krystyna Gawlikowska-Hueckel, Tomasz Komornicki Gdańsk 2014 2 Diagnoza ogólna stanu rozwoju obszaru metropolitalnego Diagnoza Diagnoza ogólna stanu rozwoju sektorowa obszaru metropolitalnego Tomasz Brodzicki, Krystyna Gawlikowska-Hueckel, Tomasz Komornicki Gdańsk 2014 5 Diagnoza ogólna stanu rozwoju obszaru metropolitalnego Spis treści 1. Wprowadzenie 9 2. Kluczowe wnioski 11 2.1 Najważniejsze ustalenia 11 2.2 Kluczowe rekomendacje 21 3. Executive summary 33 3.1 Key finding 33 3.2 Policy recommendations 44 4. Ramy i zasadnicze wyzwania dla rozwoju Obszaru Metropolitalnego 57 4.1 Ramy ogólne i uwarunkowania rozwoju Obszaru Metropolitalnego 57 4.2 Zasadnicze problemy w rozwoju OM – drzewa problemów 60 6 Diagnoza ogólna stanu rozwoju obszaru metropolitalnego 5. Gospodarka i nauka, przedsiębiorczość i innowacyjność, internacjonalizacja OM 67 5.1 Charakterystyka rozwoju gospodarczego OM 67 5.2 Internacjonalizacja OM 79 5.3 Podsumowanie 84 6. Przestrzenne uwarunkowania i problemy rozwoju OM (środowisko, infrastruktura, układ funkcjonalny) 87 6.1 Stan i zagrożenia dla środowiska naturalnego 87 6.2 Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne OM 91 6.3 Pokrycie planistyczne w obrębie OM 93 6.4 Infrastruktura transportowa OM 94 6.5 Układ osadniczo - funkcjonalny 99 7. Uwarunkowania społeczne, demograficzne i rynek pracy 105 7.1 Wprowadzenie 105 7.2 Demograficzno-osadnicze uwarunkowania rozwoju
    [Show full text]
  • Bezpieczenstwo Zdrowie
    BEZPIECZEŃSTWO, ZDROWIE I KULTURA FIZYCZNA WYBRANE ZAGADNIENIA SAFETY, HEALTH AND PHYSICAL CULTURE SELECTED ISSUES Gdynia – Gdańsk – Skarszewy 2016 BEZPIECZEŃSTWO, ZDROWIE I KULTURA FIZYCZNA WYBRANE ZAGADNIENIA Safety, health and physical culture Selected issues Redakcja naukowa / Edited by Piotr Lizakowski Dariusz Skalski Gdynia – Gdańsk – Skarszewy 2016 Kociewskie Wodne Ochotnicze Pogoowie Ratunkowe w Skarszewach przy udziale Akademii Marynarki Wojennej im. Bohaterów Westerplatte w Gdyni i Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego i Sportu im. Jędrzeja Śniadeckiego w Gdańsku Redakcja naukowa / Edited by Piotr Lizakowski, Dariusz Skalski Recenzent / Reviewers: prof. dr hab. Oksana Zabolotna (Umański Państwowy Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Pawła Ticzyny, Ukraina) Sekretarz redakcji / Assistant editor: Albert Popławski Korekta, skład i łamanie / Correction, composition and breaking: Halina Muchawska – Skalska (mgr Filologii polskiej), Albert Popławski Okładka / Cover: Albert Popławski, Maciej Miśków Zdjęcie okładki / Picture of cover: Anatoliy Yatsenko (Ratownik wodny, Ukraina) Copyright by: Kociewskie Wodne Ochotnicze Pogoowie Ratunkowe w Skarszewach przy udziale Akademii Marynarki Wojennej im. Bohaterów Westerplatte w Gdyni i Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego i Sportu im. Jędrzeja Śniadeckiego w Gdańsku Gdynia – Gdańsk – Skarszewy 2016 The Author(s) 2016. These articles is published with Open Access at Kociewskie Water Voluntary Emergency Rescue in Skarszewy at participation a Naval Academy in Gdynia and Academy of Physical Education and Sport in Gdańsk, Poland. Open Access These articles is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Settimanale
    REGIONE ABRUZZO Direzione Affari della Presidenza, Politiche Legislative e Comunitarie, Rapporti Esterni Servizio Attività di Collegamento con l'U.E. Avenue Louise 210, 1050 Bruxelles Tel. 0032.2.6262850 - Fax 0032.2.6262859 e-mail: [email protected] NEWSLETTER SETTIMANALE Numero 9 14 marzo 2008 Selezione di notizie, eventi, richieste partner e bandi di interesse regionale S O M M A R I O SEZIONE NOTIZIE DALL’UNIONE EUROPEA ( /n) TRASPORTI ................................................................................................................................ LA COMMISSIONE PROPONE UNA COMUNITÀ DEI TRASPORTI PER I BALCANI OCCIDENTALI ED ADOTTA MISURE FINALIZZATE A RINSALDARE LA COOPERAZIONE CON I PAESI CONFINANTI............................................................................... 5 CONCORRENZA ....................................................................................................................... LA COMMISSIONE AUTORIZZA UN REGIME DI AIUTI ITALIANO VOLTO A PROMUOVERE L’IMPIEGO DEL BIODIESEL ................................................................................. 6 AGRICOLTURA .......................................................................................................................... IN UN SONDAGGIO EUROBAROMETRO L'OPINIONE PUBBLICA UE DECISAMENTE FAVOREVOLE ALLE RECENTI RIFORME DELLA POLITICA AGRICOLA ......................... 8 POLITICHE REGIONALI......................................................................................................... IN UN NUOVO SONDAGGIO
    [Show full text]
  • Report Report
    report Polish Geological Institute 2009-2010 National Research Institute 4 Rakowiecka St. 00-975 Warsaw, Poland Phone (+48) 22 45 92 000, Fax (+48) 22 45 92 001 [email protected] www.pgi.gov.pl CARPATHIAN BRANCH 1 Skrzatów St., 31-560 Kraków Phone (+48) 12 290 13 99 Fax (+48) 12 290 13 88 [email protected] HOLY CROSS MTS. BRANCH 21 Zgoda St., 25-953 Kielce Phone (+48) 41 361 25 37 Fax (+48) 41 361 24 93 [email protected] LOWER SILESIAN BRANCH 19 Jaworowa Al., 53-122 Wrocław Phone (+48) 71 337 20 91-93 Fax (+48) 71 337 20 89 [email protected] MARINE GEOLOGY BRANCH 5 Kościerska St, 80-328 Gdańsk Phone (+48) 58 554 29 09 Fax (+48) 58 554 29 10 [email protected] UPPER SILESIAN BRANCH 1 Królowej Jadwigi St. 41-200 Sosnowiec Phone (+48) 32 266 20 36-37 Fax (+48) 32 266 30 40 [email protected] Pomeranian Regional Geological Unit 20 Wieniawskiego St., 71-130 Szczecin Phone (+48) 91 432 34 30 Fax (+48) 91 432 34 48 [email protected] ISBN 978-83-7538-856-5 Polish Geological Institute National Research Institute Edited by: Anna Bagińska, Barbara Żbikowska, Magdalena Mizerska, Joanna Kaczmarzyk, Mirosław Rutkowski (as based on Annual Reports of the Polish Geological Institute – National Research Institute) Graphic design by: Monika Cyrklewicz Translated by: Tadeusz Oliferko Page layout: Studyo Front cover photo: Upper Paleozoic, Upper Permian, Rotliegend aeolian sandstone, Września IG 1 borehole, a fragment of a well core from the depth of 4,069.2-4,070.2 metres; Lower Paleozoic shale (Silurian),
    [Show full text]
  • The Swarożyn Line of the Czapski Family of the Coat of Arms of Leliwa in the Early Modern Times*
    ZAPISKI HISTORYCZNE — TOM LXXXII — ROK 2017 Zeszyt 4 http://dx.doi.org/10.15762/ZH.2017.75 MIKOŁAJ TOMASZEWSKI (Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń) The Swarożyn Line of the Czapski Family of the Coat of Arms of Leliwa in the Early Modern Times* Key words: Royal Prussia, noblemen [szlachta], dietines, Lębork-Bytów Land, gene- alogy Previous historical research on individual families of Royal Prussia has not exhausted the research fields on this subject. For over a hundred years publi- cations have appeared, both in books and in scientific articles, touching upon genealogical and property issues of particular noble families. It is impossible to present in this short outline even the partial achievements of Polish or German historiography on the subject of the privileged social strata in Royal Prussia in early modern times. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning pre-war works concerning, for example, the Jabłonowski family,1 the Bażyński family2 or the Czema family.3 These publications still have a high scientific value and are of- ten included in the research conducted by contemporary historians. Recently, there have been studies concerning successive Prussian families that have un- doubtedly been recorded in the history of Pomerania, Kuyavia, Warmia [Erm- * The article was written as part of the project “Tomasz Czapski herbu Leliwa (1711–1784). Życie i działalność [Tomasz Czapski of the Leliwa coats of arms (1711–1784): life and activity]”. The project was financed from the resources of the Narodowe Centrum Nauki [National Centre for Science] upon the decision no. DEC-2015/19/N/HS3/02471. 1 Wojciech Kętrzyński, O Jabłonowskich herbu Prus III, Przewodnik Naukowy i Literacki, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
    molecules Article Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples Zaneta˙ Barga ´nska* , Piotr Konieczka and Jacek Namie´snik Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gda´nskUniversity of Technology (GUT), Narutowicza 11/12 street, 80-233 Gda´nsk,Poland; [email protected] (P.K.); [email protected] (J.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-58-347-2110; Fax: +48-58-347-2694 Received: 17 September 2018; Accepted: 7 October 2018; Published: 9 October 2018 Abstract: Developed and validated analytical methods for the determination of a wide spectrum of pesticide residues in honey and honeybee samples after the modification of QuEChERS extraction in combination with gas chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were discussed and compared. The developed methods were evaluated regarding the utilized equipment and reagents using Eco-Scale and compared in terms of extraction time, accuracy, precision, sensitivity and versatility, with similar procedures. The results proved that the QuEChERS protocol in combination with LC and GC techniques fulfills the requirements of green analytical chemistry, so it can be used as a tool in environmental monitoring. The recovery was 85–116% for honey and 85.5–103.5% for honeybee samples. The developed methods were successfully applied in monitoring real samples collected from three districts of Pomerania in Poland. Analysis of real samples revealed the presence of the following pesticides: bifenthrin, fenpyroximate, methidathione, spinosad, thiamethoxam, triazophos, metconazole and cypermethrin at levels higher than the MRLs established by the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Mortality from Cardiovascular Diseases in Pomeranian Province
    Roczniki Akademii Medycznej w Białymstoku · Vol. The50, 2005analysis · Annales of mortality Academiae from cardiovascular Medicae Bialostocensis diseases in Pomeranian province 329 The analysis of mortality from cardiovascular diseases in Pomeranian province Bartosińska M*, Ejsmont J, Zaborski L, Zagodon P Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland Absract year 2000 (361.0/100 000) to year 2002 (347.9/100 000). It was lower than in other parts of Poland (449.8/100 000 in Purpose: Descriptive epidemiology characterises fre- year 2000) but higher than in countries of European Union quency of appearance of given event (here decease) in (257.8/100 000 in year 2000). dependence of many factors concerning a person, region Conclusions: Mortality from cardiovascular diseases has or time of existence of given salubrious phenomena. The decreased during last few years. Also there are distinctions source of information was the official death registry that in this phenomena among regions of Pomeranian province, provides complete records of all deaths that took place in other parts of Poland and countries of European Union. Pomeranian province. This description of sanitary situation From these reasons health care should be differentiated to of people from particular area enables doing comparison address the differences in spatial patterns of risk observed. between regions, facilitates researching etiological factors, planning work of medical workers and programming pre- ventive rules. Cardiovascular diseases during last fifty years Key words: epidemiology, mortality, cardiovascular are the main reason of death of people from developed coun- diseases. tries witch is also Poland. Material and methods: The aim of this work is to find out differences in health condition between citizens of Pomera- Introduction nian province and other people in Poland and countries of European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Counties of Poland
    Sr.No County County seat Area Population 1 Aleksandrow County Aleksandrow Kujawski 475.61 km2 55,195 2 Augustow County Augustow 1658,27 km2 58,966 3 Bartoszyce County Bartoszyce 1308,54 km2 61,354 4 Bedzin County Bedzin 368,02 km2 151,122 5 Belchatow County Belchatow 969,21 km2 112,640 6 Biala Podlaska city county 49,40 km2 58,010 7 Biala Podlaska County Biala Podlaska 2753,67 km2 113,764 8 Bialobrzegi County Bialobrzegi 639,28 km2 33,545 9 Bialogard County Bialogard 845,36 km2 48,241 10 Bialystok city county 102,12 km2 295,210 11 Bialystok County Bialystok 2984,64 km2 136,797 12 Bielsk County Bielsk Podlaski 1385,2 km2 60,047 13 Bielsko County Bielsko-Biala 457,23 km2 150,764 14 Bielsko-Biala city county 124,51 km2 176,678 15 Bierun-Ledziny County Bierun 156,68 km2 55,868 16 Bieszczady County Ustrzyki Dolne 1138,17 km2 22,213 17 Bilgoraj County Bilgoraj 1677,79 km2 104,267 18 Bochnia County Bochnia 649,28 km2 100,382 19 Boleslawiec County Boleslawiec 1303,26 km2 88,343 20 Braniewo County Braniewo 1204,54 km2 43,781 21 Brodnica County Brodnica 1038,79 km2 75,054 22 Brzeg County Brzeg 876,52 km2 92,361 23 Brzesko County Brzesko 590 km2 90,214 24 Brzeziny County Brzeziny 358,51 km2 30,600 25 Brzozow County Brzozow 540,39 km2 65,254 26 Busko County Busko-Zdroj 967.39 km2 73,940 27 Bydgoszcz city county 175 km2 364,953 28 Bydgoszcz County Bydgoszcz 1394,8 km2 95,773 29 Bytom city county 69,43 km2 187,205 30 Bytow County Bytow 2192,81 km2 75,313 31 Chelm city county 35,28 km2 67,989 32 Chelm County Chelm 1779,64 km2 79,991 33 Chelmno County
    [Show full text]
  • 183 the OLDEST GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION of a HORSE
    ODKRYCIA / DISCOVERIES Wiadomości Archeologiczne LXX, 2019: 183–195 https://doi.org/10.36154/wa.70.2019.09 Andrzej Kokowski The Oldest Graphic Representation OF A Horse in Eastern Central EUrope Najstarsze wyobrażenie konia na wschodzie Europy środkowej Keywords: horse images on pottery, Funnel Beaker Culture, Bronze Age, Early Iron Age, Pomeranian Culture Słowa kluczowe: wyobrażenia koni na ceramice, kultura pucharów lejkowatych, epoka brązu, wczesna epoka żelaza, kultura pomorska Strictly speaking, figural representations (of people and ani- tom (tail), and on the right – first bent towards the top (neck) mals) on earthenware had not been common in Eastern Cen- and then slightly slanted down (head). From the trunk line ex- tral Europe until the Hallstatt Period, when they were found in tend two pairs of lines symbolising limbs, almost in every case large numbers on the bellies and necks of urns, which were of- bent slightly at the knees. The sizes of these representations ten decorated with artistic representations of human faces and used by the people of the Pomeranian Culture. Somewhat ear- lier, in the younger stage of the Bronze Age, they occasionally appeared on vessels of the Lusatian Culture. In older periods they included absolutely unique finds, the oldest of them be- ing discovered in Bronocice, Pińczów County, Świętokrzyskie Province. It is dated to 3491 BC – 3060 BC, associated with the people of the Funnel Beaker Culture, and depicts a four- wheeled cart1. Another, much simpler drawing on a vessel of the same culture from the town of Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Świętokrzyskie Province is regarded to be another represen- tation of such a vehicle2.
    [Show full text]