Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients with Problematic Spitzoid Melanocytic Lesions a Report on 18 Patients
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Clinical Features of Benign Tumors of the External Auditory Canal According to Pathology
Central Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology Research Article *Corresponding author Jae-Jun Song, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Clinical Features of Benign Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 152-703, South Korea, Tel: 82-2-2626-3191; Fax: 82-2-868-0475; Tumors of the External Auditory Email: Submitted: 31 March 2017 Accepted: 20 April 2017 Canal According to Pathology Published: 21 April 2017 ISSN: 2379-948X Jeong-Rok Kim, HwibinIm, Sung Won Chae, and Jae-Jun Song* Copyright Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College © 2017 Song et al. of Medicine, South Korea OPEN ACCESS Abstract Keywords Background and Objectives: Benign tumors of the external auditory canal (EAC) • External auditory canal are rare among head and neck tumors. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical • Benign tumor features of patients who underwent surgery for an EAC mass confirmed as a benign • Surgical excision lesion. • Recurrence • Infection Methods: This retrospective study involved 53 patients with external auditory tumors who received surgical treatment at Korea University, Guro Hospital. Medical records and evaluations over a 10-year period were examined for clinical characteristics and pathologic diagnoses. Results: The most common pathologic diagnoses were nevus (40%), osteoma (13%), and cholesteatoma (13%). Among the five pathologic subgroups based on the origin organ of the tumor, the most prevalent pathologic subgroup was the skin lesion (47%), followed by the epithelial lesion (26%), and the bony lesion (13%). No significant differences were found in recurrence rate, recurrence duration, sex, or affected side between pathologic diagnoses. -
Short Course 11 Pigmented Lesions of the Skin
Rev Esp Patol 1999; Vol. 32, N~ 3: 447-453 © Prous Science, SA. © Sociedad Espafiola de Anatomfa Patol6gica Short Course 11 © Sociedad Espafiola de Citologia Pigmented lesions of the skin Chairperson F Contreras Spain Ca-chairpersons S McNutt USA and P McKee, USA. Problematic melanocytic nevi melanin pigment is often evident. Frequently, however, the lesion is solely intradermal when it may be confused with a fibrohistiocytic RH. McKee and F.R.C. Path tumor, particularly epithelloid cell fibrous histiocytoma (4). It is typi- cally composed of epitheliold nevus cells with abundant eosinophilic Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, cytoplasm and large, round, to oval vesicular nuclei containing pro- USA. minent eosinophilic nucleoli. Intranuclear cytoplasmic pseudoinclu- sions are common and mitotic figures are occasionally present. The nevus cells which are embedded in a dense, sclerotic connective tis- Whether the diagnosis of any particular nevus is problematic or not sue stroma, usually show maturation with depth. Less frequently the nevus is composed solely of spindle cells which may result in confu- depends upon a variety of factors, including the experience and enthusiasm of the pathologist, the nature of the specimen (shave vs. sion with atrophic fibrous histiocytoma. Desmoplastic nevus can be distinguished from epithelloid fibrous histiocytoma by its paucicellu- punch vs. excisional), the quality of the sections (and their staining), larity, absence of even a focal storiform growth pattern and SiQO pro- the hour of the day or day of the week in addition to the problems relating to the ever-increasing range of histological variants that we tein/HMB 45 expression. -
Identification of HRAS Mutations and Absence of GNAQ Or GNA11
Modern Pathology (2013) 26, 1320–1328 1320 & 2013 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/13 $32.00 Identification of HRAS mutations and absence of GNAQ or GNA11 mutations in deep penetrating nevi Ryan P Bender1, Matthew J McGinniss2, Paula Esmay1, Elsa F Velazquez3,4 and Julie DR Reimann3,4 1Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 2Genoptix Medical Laboratory, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 3Dermatopathology Division, Miraca Life Sciences Research Institute, Newton, MA, USA and 4Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA HRAS is mutated in B15% of Spitz nevi, and GNAQ or GNA11 is mutated in blue nevi (46–83% and B7% respectively). Epithelioid blue nevi and deep penetrating nevi show features of both blue nevi (intradermal location, pigmentation) and Spitz nevi (epithelioid morphology). Epithelioid blue nevi and deep penetrating nevi can also show overlapping features with melanoma, posing a diagnostic challenge. Although epithelioid blue nevi are considered blue nevic variants, no GNAQ or GNA11 mutations have been reported. Classification of deep penetrating nevi as blue nevic variants has also been proposed, however, no GNAQ or GNA11 mutations have been reported and none have been tested for HRAS mutations. To better characterize these tumors, we performed mutational analysis for GNAQ, GNA11, and HRAS, with blue nevi and Spitz nevi as controls. Within deep penetrating nevi, none demonstrated GNAQ or GNA11 mutations (0/38). However, 6% revealed HRAS mutation (2/32). Twenty percent of epithelioid blue nevi contained a GNAQ mutation (2/10), while none displayed GNA11 or HRAS mutation. Eighty-seven percent of blue nevi contained a GNAQ mutation (26/30), 4% a GNA11 mutation (1/28), and none an HRAS mutation. -
Acral Melanoma
Accepted Date : 07-Jul-2015 Article type : Original Article The BRAAFF checklist: a new dermoscopic algorithm for diagnosing acral melanoma Running head: Dermoscopy of acral melanoma Word count: 3138, Tables: 6, Figures: 6 A. Lallas,1 A. Kyrgidis,1 H. Koga,2 E. Moscarella,1 P. Tschandl,3 Z. Apalla,4 A. Di Stefani,5 D. Ioannides,2 H. Kittler,4 K. Kobayashi,6,7 E. Lazaridou,2 C. Longo,1 A. Phan,8 T. Saida,3 M. Tanaka,6 L. Thomas,8 I. Zalaudek,9 G. Argenziano.10 Article 1. Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy 2. Department of Dermatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan 3. Department of Dermatology, Division of General Dermatology, Medical University, Vienna, Austria 4. First Department of Dermatology, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece 5. Division of Dermatology, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Rome, Italy 6. Department of Dermatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan 7. Kobayashi Clinic, Tokyo, Japan 8. Department of Dermatology, Claude Bernard - Lyon 1 University, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre Bénite, France. 9. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University, Graz, Austria 10. Dermatology Unit, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as Accepted doi: 10.1111/bjd.14045 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Please address all correspondence to: Aimilios Lallas, MD. -
Lentigo Maligna Melanoma and Simulants Maui January 2020 Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations
Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations II. Lentigo Maligna Melanoma and Simulants Maui January 2020 Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations • RGP Melanomas • SSM, LMM, ALM, MLM • Intermediate lesions • Dysplastic nevi, Atypical lentiginous proliferations in high CSD skin; Atypical Acral lentiginous nevi • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations • Pagetoid plaque-like Spitz nevi; pigmented spindle cell nevus (Reed) • Special site nevi (genital, breast, scalp, ear, flexural, etc). • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations of uncertain significance • Atypical/unusual/uncertain examples of all of the above Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations • RGP Melanomas • SSM, LMM, ALM, MLM • Intermediate lesions • Dysplastic nevi, Atypical lentiginous proliferations in high CSD skin; Atypical Acral lentiginous nevi • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations • Pagetoid plaque-like Spitz nevi; pigmented spindle cell nevus (Reed) • Special site nevi (genital, breast, scalp, ear, flexural, etc). • Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations of uncertain significance • Atypical/unusual/uncertain examples of all of the above High CSD Melanomas and Simulants. D Elder, Maui, HI Jan 2020 Lentigo maligna melanoma Atypical lentiginous nevi/proliferations High CSD: Lentiginous Nevi and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma and Simulant(s) • Lentiginous Melanoma of Sun-Damaged Skin • LMM in situ • LMM invasive • Distinction from Dysplastic Nevi (Dysplastic Nevus-like Melanoma/Nevoid Lentigo Maligna • Lentiginous Nevi of -
Dysplastic Nevus Panel Discussion
Dysplastic Nevus Panel Discussion Maxwell Fung, MD, Moderator Director, UC Davis Dermatopathology Service Kerri Rieger, MD PhD Stanford Dermatopathology Service Joshua Schulman, MD Director of Dermatopathology, Sacramento Veterans Affairs Medical Center Definitions, Diagnostic criteria Dysplastic nevus • Major criteria (required) • basilar proliferation of atypical melanocytes extending 3 rete ridges beyond a dermal component (if present) i.e. “shoulder” • intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation (lentiginous or epithelioid) • Minor criteria (≥ 2) • fusion of rete ridges • concentric/lamellar eosinophilic fibrosis • inflammatory host response • neovascularization Clemente C, et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of dysplastic nevi: concordance among pathologists convened by the WHO Melanoma Programme. Hum Pathol 1991;22:313-19. Naeyaert JM, Brochez L. Dysplastic nevi. N Eng J Med 2003;23:349:2233-2240 Atypical nevus/mole Fig 1. Duffy K, Grossman D. • Usually 4-12 mm The dysplastic nevus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:19:31-12. • Asymmetry • Irregular pigmentation • Irregular border pigmented • Ill-defined border seborrheic keratosis • Macular component, usually peripheral Dysplastic nevus syndrome atypical mole syndrome, B-K mole syndrome, familial melanoma syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole-melanoma (FAMMM) • OMIM #155600 NIH Consensus criteria Occurrence of melanoma in ≥1 first- or second-degree relatives Large number of nevi (often >50), some of which are clinically atypical (and) Nevi with certain distinct histologic features Dutch -
Incidence of New and Changed Nevi and Melanomas Detected Using Baseline Images and Dermoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Melanoma
STUDY Incidence of New and Changed Nevi and Melanomas Detected Using Baseline Images and Dermoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Melanoma Jeremy P. Banky, MBBS; John W. Kelly, MDBS; Dallas R. English, PhD; Josephine M. Yeatman, MBBS, FACD; John P. Dowling, MBBS, FRCPA Objective: To determine the incidence of new, changed, Results: The incidence of new, changed, and regressed and regressed nevi and melanomas in a cohort of pa- nevi decreased with increasing age (PϽ.001), whereas tients at high risk for melanoma using baseline total body the incidence of melanomas increased (P=.05). The num- photography and dermatoscopy. ber of dysplastic nevi at baseline was positively associ- ated with the incidence of changed nevi (PϽ.001) and Design: Cohort study of patients at high risk for mela- melanomas (P=.03). The use of baseline photography and noma who underwent baseline cutaneous photography dermatoscopy was associated with low biopsy rates and between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, and early detection of melanomas. The development of mela- had at least 1 follow-up visit by December 31, 1998. noma in association with a preexisting nevus was not di- rectly correlated with a change in a preexisting lesion Setting: Private practice rooms of 1 dermatologist in con- monitored by baseline photography. junction with a public hospital-based, multidisciplinary melanoma clinic in Victoria, Australia. Conclusions: Nevi are dynamic, and only a small per- centage of all new and changed melanocytic lesions are Patients: A total of 309 patients who had at least 1 of the following risk factors for melanoma: personal his- melanomas. -
Things That Go Bump in the Light. the Differential Diagnosis of Posterior
Eye (2002) 16, 325–346 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-222X/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/eye IG Rennie Things that go bump THE DUKE ELDER LECTURE 2001 in the light. The differential diagnosis of posterior uveal melanomas Eye (2002) 16, 325–346. doi:10.1038/ The list of lesions that may simulate a sj.eye.6700117 malignant melanoma is extensive; Shields et al4 in a study of 400 patients referred to their service with a pseudomelanoma found these to encompass 40 different conditions at final diagnosis. Naturally, some lesions are Introduction mistaken for melanomas more frequently than The role of the ocular oncologist is two-fold: others. In this study over one quarter of the he must establish the correct diagnosis and patients referred with a diagnosis of a then institute the appropriate therapy, if presumed melanoma were subsequently found required. Prior to the establishment of ocular to have a suspicious naevus. We have recently oncology as a speciality in its own right, the examined the records of patients referred to majority of patients with a uveal melanoma the ocular oncology service in Sheffield with were treated by enucleation. It was recognised the diagnosis of a malignant melanoma. that inaccuracies in diagnosis occurred, but Patients with iris lesions or where the the frequency of these errors was not fully diagnosis of a melanoma was not mentioned appreciated until 1964 when Ferry studied a in the referral letter were excluded. During series of 7877 enucleation specimens. He the period 1985–1999 1154 patients were found that out of 529 eyes clinically diagnosed referred with a presumed melanoma and of as containing a melanoma, 100 harboured a these the diagnosis was confirmed in 936 lesion other than a malignant melanoma.1 cases (81%). -
Dermoscopy of Pigmented Skin Lesions (Part
Dermoscopy of Pigmented Skin Lesions* (Part II) H. Peter Soyer,a MD; Giuseppe Argenziano,b MD; Sergio Chimenti, c MD; Vincenzo Ruocco,b MD aDepartment of Dermatology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria bDepartment of Dermatology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy cDepartment of Dermatology, University Tor Vergata of Rome, Rome, Italy * This CME article is partly reprinted from the Book and CD-Rom ’Interactive Atlas of Dermoscopy’ with permission from EDRA (Medical Publishing & New Media) -- see also www.dermoscopy.org Corresponding author: H. Peter Soyer, MD Department of Dermatology, University of Graz Auenbruggerplatz 8 - A-8036 Graz, Austria Phone: 0043-316-385-3235 Fax: 0043-0316-385-4957 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: dermoscopy, dermatoscopy, epiluminescence microscopy, incident light microscopy, skin surface microscopy, melanoma, pigmented skin lesions, clinical diagnosis 1 Dermoscopy is a non-invasive technique combining digital photography and light microscopy for in vivo observation and diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. For dermoscopic analysis, pigmented skin lesions are covered with liquid (mineral oil, alcohol, or water) and examined under magnification ranging from 6x to 100x, in some cases using a dermatoscope connected to a digital imaging system. The improved visualization of surface and subsurface structures obtained with this technique allows the recognition of morphologic structures within the lesions that would not be detected otherwise. These morphological structures can be classified on -
Clinical Pigmented Skin Lesions Nontest-June 11
Recognizing Melanocytic Lesions James E. Fitzpatrick, M.D. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center No conflicts of interest to report Pigmented Skin Lesions L Pigmented keratinocyte neoplasias – Solar lentigo – Seborrheic keratosis – Pigmented actinic keratosis (uncommon) L Melanocytic hyperactivity – Ephelides (freckles) – Café-au-lait macules L Melanocytic neoplasia – Simple lentigo (lentigo simplex) – Benign nevocellular nevi – Dermal melanocytoses – Atypical (dysplastic) nevus – Malignant melanocytic lesions Solar Lentigo (Lentigo Senilis, Lentigo Solaris, Liver Spot, Age Spot) L Proliferation of keratinocytes with ↑ melanin – Variable hyperplasia in number of melanocytes L Pathogenesis- ultraviolet light damage Note associated solar purpura Solar Lentigo L Older patients L Light skin type L Photodistributed L Benign course L Problem- distinguishing form lentigo maligna Seborrheic Keratosis “Barnacles of Aging” L Epithelial proliferation L Common- 89% of geriatric population L Pathogenesis unknown – Follicular tumor (best evidence) – FGFR3 mutations in a subset Seborrheic Keratosis Clinical Features L Distribution- trunk>head and neck>extremities L Primary lesion – Exophytic papule with velvety to verrucous surface- “stuck on appearance” – Color- white, gray, tan, brown, black L Complications- inflammation, pruritus, and simulation of cutaneous malignancy L Malignancy potential- none to low (BCC?) Seborrheic Keratosis Seborrheic Keratosis- skin tag-like variant Pigmented Seborrheic Keratosis Inflamed Seborrheic Keratosis Café-au-Lait -
Atypical Mole (Dysplastic Nevus)
Atypical Mole (Dysplastic Nevus) Author: Dr. Ioulios Palamaras1 Creation date: April 2004 Scientific editor: Prof. Nicolaos G. Stavrianeas 1Second Department of Dermatology and Venereology, General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Rimini 1 str. 12462, Haidari, Athens, Greece. [email protected] Abstract Keywords Definition Disease names and historical background Epidemiology Ethiopathogenesis Clinical description and diagnosis criteria Histopathological features Diagnosis methods Differential diagnosis Treatment, prognosis and preventional measures References Abstract Atypical moles (Ams) represent a commonly acquired activated junctional nevus. There are fairly common with onset near puberty and they remain dynamic throughout adulthood. They rarely progress to melanoma and are considered primarily as markers of increased risk of developing it and no obligate precursor lesions of it. Development of atypical nevus is due to an interaction of genetic and environmental factors. There are no reliable clinical features that allow diagnosing with absolute certitude an atypical mole from a benign melanocytic nevus. An atypical mole, is a mole with a macular or macular and papular component showing at least three of the following criteria: irregular, poor-defined borders; asymmetric shape; irregular distributed pigmentation; a red peripheral hue and size larger than 5mm. Regarding familial atypical multiple mole-melanoma syndrome (FAMMM) diagnosis criteria are: occurrence of melanoma in one or more first conjugal degree relatives; presence of more than fifty nevus and presence of nevus(i) with atypical histologic features. Nowadays, no therapy is available to prevent the development of Ams. Individuals with AMs should be examined on a regular basis and educated to avoid extreme sun exposure. The frequency of follow-up depends on the risk of melanoma development (i.e. -
Cosmetic Light Therapies and the Risks of Atypical Pigmented Lesions
Case Report Cosmetic light therapies Editor’s key points Light therapies, such as intense and the risks of atypical pulsed light therapy and laser therapy, are being used more often pigmented lesions for elective treatment of pigmented lesions because of their tolerability MD MHA MD FRCPC MD MPH Lauren Curry Natalie Cunningham Shweta Dhawan and risk reduction of scarring. ight therapies, including intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and laser The risks of light therapies therapy, are increasingly used for elective treatment of pigmented are debated and not thoroughly lesions. These treatments are usually well tolerated and might result studied. Cases of pseudomelanoma, malignant melanoma, and Lin reduced risk of scarring compared to treatment with surgical excision. metastatic melanoma have been However, the associated risks of treating pigmented lesions with light thera- identified after light treatment of pies are debated and not well studied. pigmented lesions, but whether light therapies cause melanoma is Case yet to be determined. A 56-year-old healthy white woman was referred to a dermatologist for A biopsy should be considered in evaluation of an atypical pigmented lesion on her left cheek. It began as cases where diagnosis is unclear or a dark spot more than 10 years before and was treated as a “sunspot” or where repigmentation occurs following solar lentigo (SL) by an aesthetician with 1 session of IPL therapy. The light therapy to improve the primary lesion partially faded with treatment, but eventually repigmented, grew, care provider’s ability to diagnose and and developed areas of depigmentation in the 6 months before presenta- manage pigmented lesions.