How to Determine and Increase Short Circuit Current Ratings for Industrial Control Panels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT RATINGS How to Determine and Increase Short Circuit Current Ratings for Industrial Control Panels WHITE PAPER How to Determine and Increase Short-Circuit Current Ratings for Industrial Control Panels Introduction if a panel had a main feeder circuit protective device with an interrupting rating of 22 kA, then the manufacturer of an A short-circuit current rating (SCCR)1 is the maximum current unapproved panel would also label their panel with an SCCR a device or system can safely withstand for a specified of 22 kA. time (such as 0.05 seconds), or until a specified fuse or circuit breaker opens and clears the circuit. SCCR is usually However, each power component within the panel has a expressed in kiloamperes (kA). different SCCR or IR, many of which are likely to have a rating of 5 kA or less. Therefore, if a 22-kA fault occurs, even if the SCCR labeling requirements create a safe installation and main circuit protective device can safely interrupt the fault, help manufacturers, owners and managers meet OSHA one or more of the power components within the panel can regulations and NFPA codes and standards. still potentially catch on fire or violently explode. Both the NEC and OSHA forbid equipment from being located The NEC specifically requires SCCR markings for: near any point where the available short-circuit current is more than what the equipment can withstand. • Services (Article 230) Available fault currents are increasing in industrial facilities • Industrial Control Panels (Article 409) due to a continuously increasing demand for electric power. When available fault currents at the equipment exceed the • Motors, Motor Circuits, and Controllers (Article 430) panel’s SCCR, there can be catastrophic results. • Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Equipment (Article Current-limiting fuses can optimize a panel to give it a strong 440) competitive advantage over molded case circuit breakers (MCCB) so long as SCCR is considered in its design. Most • Elevators, Dumbwaiters, Escalators, Moving Walks, MCCBs do not provide adequate SCCRs. Platform Lifts, and Stairway Chairlifts (Article 620) The most traditional way to increase a panel’s low SCCR • Industrial Machinery (Article 670) that is caused from an MCCB is to replace the MCCB with current-limiting fuses. But after making this improvement • Emergency Systems (Article 700) to the panel, how can you increase the panel’s SCCR even further? • Legally Required Standby Systems (Article 701) • Optional Standby Systems (Article 702) Why Must Industrial Control Panels Be • Critical Operations Power Systems (Article 708) Marked with Their SCCR? These markings allow installers and inspectors to compare NEC Article 409.110 requires industrial control panels (ICP) fault current studies at the facility where the panels are to be visibly marked with the panel’s overall SCCR. NEC intended to be installed to the SCCR of the control panel Article 409 requires an analysis of panels and facilities to be to minimize potential hazards in industrial or commercial conducted for potential electrical hazards. The marked SCCR facilities. must be based on either the SCCR of a listed and labeled assembly or on an SCCR that was established by an approved For safety and reliability, it is essential to compare accurate method. Overcurrent protective devices must also be marked SCCR markings on equipment with the available fault currents with an interrupting rating or an ampere interrupting capacity. on a regular basis. A common misconception among equipment manufacturers is that the ampere interrupting capacity or the interrupting rating (IR) of the main circuit protection device is the same as the industrial control panel’s (ICP) SCCR. This can confuse personnel about where the panel may be safely used. For example, before the introduction of NEC Article 409 in 2005, 1 Short-circuit current ratings were known as “withstand ratings” before the NEC first defined it in the 1999 edition. © 2019 Littelfuse, Inc. 2 Littelfuse.com How to Determine and Increase Short-Circuit Current Ratings for Industrial Control Panels What is a Current-Limiting Overcurrent How Does Current Limitation Increase Protective Device? SCCRs? Current-limiting overcurrent protective devices, as defined Current limitation increases SCCRs because it reduces the by Article 240.2 of the NEC, reduce the current flowing destructive thermal energy. Figure 1 shows the maximum in a faulted circuit to a magnitude that is substantially instantaneous peak current (Ipeak) during the first half cycle less than what would otherwise be obtained if the device after the initiation of a fault. The gray area represents what were replaced with a solid conductor with a comparable the Ipeak will be without the use of current-limiting fuses, while impedance. When operating in their current-limiting range, the green area depicts the Ipeak when current-limiting fuses these devices can clear a short circuit current in less than 8.3 are used. milliseconds, which is less than one half of an electrical ac cycle (see Figure 1). Depending on the power factor and when the fault occurs, the maximum possible Ipeak without current limitation can Current-limiting overcurrent protective devices must interrupt be as high as 2.3 times the available rms fault current when currents in their current-limiting range to be effective. the fault occurs. However, when current-limiting fuses are used, the maximum Ipeak is only a small fraction of what the potential flow would otherwise be. The area under the curve represents the I²t let-through energy of the fuse. The lower the I²t, the lower the potentially destructive thermal energy will be that passes through the circuit when it is interrupted. Maximum peak-let through current with noncurrent-limiting fuses. (Peak value can be as high as 2.3 times the available rms fault current.) CURRENT NOTE: Total clearing I2t = Melting I2t + Arcing I2t Point at which Maximum peak-let through current a fault occurs with current-limiting fuses Fuse elements melt Arcing energy (l2t) Melting energy (l2t) TIME Melting Arcing time time Arc is extinguished Fuse total clearing time (less than ½ a cycle) Figure 1. Maximum instantaneous peak current during first 1/2 cycle of a fault with current-limiting fuses versus noncurrent-limiting fuses. © 2019 Littelfuse, Inc. 3 Littelfuse.com How to Determine and Increase Short-Circuit Current Ratings for Industrial Control Panels 1000000 1000000 Interrupting Ratings for Overcurrent 800000 800000 600000 B 600000 B Protective Devices 400000 400000 300000 300000 233000 200000 Although fuses and circuit breakers are tested using different 200000 Fuse Fuse methods, a fuse’s interrupting rating (as well as the AIC of a 100000 Ampere Ampere Rating 100000 Rating circuit breaker) is considered to be the same as its SCCR. 80000 80000 60000 600 A 60000 c b 600 A 40000 400 A 40000 400 A 30000 30000 NEC Article 110.9 says that “equipment intended to interrupt 200 A 200 A 20000 20000 current at fault levels shall have an interrupting rating at 100 A 100 A 60 A 60 A nominal circuit voltage at least equal to the current that is 10000 10000 8000 30 A 8000 30 A available at the line terminals of the equipment.” 6000 6000 4000 4000 NEC Article 110.10 specifically requires the coordination of 3000 3000 overcurrent protective devices and the components that they 2000 2000 are designed to protect. This prevents extensive damage to 1000 1000 any component or circuit in the event of a short circuit fault. 800 800 600 A 600 400 400 Fuses and circuit breakers that are Listed or Recognized by an 300 300 Instantaneous peak let-through current in amperes current Instantaneous peak let-through 200 NRTL are tested in a laboratory to verify that they can safely in amperes current Instantaneous peak let-through 200 A interrupt certain fault currents. To obtain certifications, a fuse 100 100 d a 100 200 300 400 600 800 must open safely and not damage itself or anything around 100 200 300 400 600 800 1000 2000 3000 4000 6000 8000 1000 2000 3000 4000 6000 8000 10000 20000 30000 40000 60000 80000 10000 18000 20000 30000 40000 60000 80000 100000 200000 it. It also may not vent hot gases, which can ignite flammable 100000 200000 surroundings. Available fault current symmetrical rms amperes Available fault current symmetrical rms amperes Figure 2. Relationship between available rms fault current Circuit breakers must also open safely under controlled and maximum instantaneous peak during a short circuit. conditions and not ignite nearby objects. Circuit breakers, Figure 14 Figure 15 however, can vent high-temperature gases and can be a source of ignition in hazardous areas. Current Limitation and Peak Let-through Some circuit breakers and supplementary protectors are Charts tested and approved to be able to safely interrupt a high-level short circuit current only one time. After the first interruption, Current-limiting fuses operating in their current-limiting range these circuit breakers may not be operable and cannot be will limit the maximum instantaneous peak current (Ipeak) to approved to be used again. a value that is substantially less than the peak current that could flow if the fuse were not in the circuit. Figure 2 shows the relationship between the available Rms versus Ipeak symmetrical rms fault current and the maximum possible I if a short circuit occurs. Figure 2(A–B) is the maximum The SCCR of components in panels is expressed as rms kA. peak possible I under worst-case conditions (15 % power Root mean square (rms) current is an expression of effective peak factor, asymmetrical), or 2.3 times the available symmetrical current over a time period. rms fault current. The other lines in Figure 2 illustrate how ampere ratings of standard current-limiting fuses affect the Conversely, if the Ipeak of a current-limiting fuse is 23 kA, then peak let-through.
Recommended publications
  • Momentary Podl Connector and Cable Shorts

    Momentary Podl Connector and Cable Shorts

    Momentary PoDL Connector and Cable Shorts Andy Gardner – Linear Technology Corporation 2 Presentation Objectives • To put forward a momentary connector or cable short fault scenario for Ethernet PoDL. • To quantify the requirements for surviving the energy dissipation and cable voltage transients subsequent to the momentary short. 3 PoDL Circuit with Momentary Short • IPSE= IPD= IL1= IL2= IL3= IL4 at steady-state. • D1-D4 and D5-D8 represent the master and slave PHY body diodes, respectively. • PoDL fuse or circuit breaker will open during a sustained over- current (OC) fault but may not open during a momentary OC fault. 4 PoDL Inductor Current Imbalance during a Cable or Connector Short • During a connector or cable short, the PoDL inductor currents will become unbalanced. • The current in inductors L1 and L2 will increase, while the current in inductors L3 and L4 will reverse. • Maximum inductor energy is limited by the PoDL inductors’ saturation current, i.e. ISAT > IPD(max). • Stored inductor energy resulting from the current imbalance will be dissipated by termination and parasitic resistances as well as the PHYs’ body diodes. • DC blocking capacitors C1-C4 need to be rated for peak transient voltages subsequent to the momentary short. 5 Max Energy Storage in PoDL Coupling Inductors during a Momentary Short • PoDL inductors L1-L4 are constrained by tdroop: −50 × 푡푑푟표표푝 퐿 > 푃표퐷퐿 ln 1 − 0.45 1 퐸 ≈ 4 × × 퐿 × 퐼 2 퐿(푡표푡푎푙) 2 푃표퐷퐿 푆퐴푇 • Example: if tdroop=500ns, LPoDL=42H which yields: ISAT Total EL 1A 84J 3A 756J 10A 8.4mJ 6 Peak Transient Voltage after a Short • The maximum voltage across the PHY DC blocking capacitors C1-C4 following a momentary short assuming damping ratio 휁 is: 퐿푃표퐷퐿 50Ω 푉푚푎푥 ≈ 퐼푠푎푡 × = 퐼푠푎푡 × 퐶휑푏푙표푐푘 2 × 휁 4 × 푡푑푟표표푝 where 퐶 ≥ −휁2 × 휑푏푙표푐푘 50Ω × ln (1 − 0.45) • The maximum voltage differential between the conductors in the twisted pair is then: Vmax(diff) = 2 Vmax ISAT 50/휁 • Example: A critically damped PoDL network (휁=1) with inductor ISAT = 1A yields Vmax(diff) 50V while an inductor ISAT = 10A will yield Vmax(diff) 500V.
  • Short Circuit and Overload Protection Devices Within an Electrical System

    Short Circuit and Overload Protection Devices Within an Electrical System

    TM Information Sheet # 07 Short Circuit and Overload Protection Your Reliable Guide for Power Solutions Devices Within an Electrical System 1.0 Introduction The designer of an electrical system has the responsibility to meet code requirements and to ensure that the equipment and conductors within a system are protected against current flows that will produce destructive temperatures above specified rating and design limits. This information sheet discusses protective devices that are used within a system, how they work and where they are used. 2.0 Overcurrent protection devices: Protection against temperature is termed “overcurrent protection.” Overcurrents are caused by equipment overloads, by short circuits or by ground faults. An overload occurs when equipment is subjected to current above its rated capacity and excessive heat is produced. A short circuit occurs when there is a direct but unintended connection between line-to-line or line-to-neutral conductors. Short circuits can generate temperatures thousands of degrees above designated ratings. A ground fault occurs when electrical current flows from a conductor to uninsulated metal that is not designed to conduct electricity. These uninsulated currents can be lethal. The designer has many overcurrent protection devices to choose from. The two most common are fuses and circuit breakers. Many circuit breakers are also known as molded case breakers or MCBs. Fuses: A fuse is the simplest form of overcurrent protective device but it can be used only once before it must be replaced. A fuse consists of a conducting element enclosed in a glass, ceramic or other non-conductive tube and connected by ferrules at each end of the tube.
  • Supercapacitor Power Management Module Michael Brooks Santa Clara University

    Supercapacitor Power Management Module Michael Brooks Santa Clara University

    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Electrical Engineering Senior Theses Student Scholarship 7-16-2014 Supercapacitor power management module Michael Brooks Santa Clara University Anderson Fu Santa Clara University Brett Kehoe Santa Clara University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/elec_senior Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Brooks, Michael; Fu, Anderson; and Kehoe, Brett, "Supercapacitor power management module" (2014). Electrical Engineering Senior Theses. Paper 7. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electrical Engineering Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Supercapacitor Power Management Module BY Michael Brooks, Anderson Fu, and Brett Kehoe DESIGN PROJECT REPORT Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering in the School of Engineering of Santa Clara University, 2014 Santa Clara, California ii Table of Contents Signature Page. .i . Title Page. ii Table of Contents. iii Abstract. v Acknowledgements . .vi 1 Introduction . …………………… 1 1.1 Core Statement . …………1 1.2 Supercapacitors and Energy Storage . ………......3 1.3 Design Goal . …………… 3 1.4 Design Considerations . …4 1.5 Module Overview . ……...6 Design of Module 2 Charge Management . 8 2.1 Choosing a Supercapacitor . …8 2.2 Safely Charging Supercapacitors. 9 2.3 Voltage Balancing Circuit. 10 2.4 Charge Sources . 11 3 Output Utilization. 13 3.1 Single Ended Primary Inductor Converter. …13 3.2 LT3959: Compensated SEPIC Feedback Controller . .13 3.3 SEPIC Topology .
  • IEEE Std 3002.3™-2018 Recommended Practice for Conducting Short-Circuit Studies and Analysis of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems

    IEEE Std 3002.3™-2018 Recommended Practice for Conducting Short-Circuit Studies and Analysis of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems

    IEEE 3002 STANDARDS: POWER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS IEEE Std 3002.3™-2018 Recommended Practice for Conducting Short-Circuit Studies and Analysis of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems IEEE Std 3002.3™-2018 IEEE Recommended Practice for Conducting Short-Circuit Studies and Analysis of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Sponsor Technical Books Coordinating Committee of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Approved 27 September 2018 IEEE-SA Standards Board Abstract: Activities related to short-circuit analysis, including design considerations for new systems, analytical studies for existing systems, as well as operational and model validation considerations for industrial and commercial power systems are addressed. Fault current calculation and device duty evaluation is included in short-circuit analysis. Accuracy of calculation results primarily relies on system modeling assumptions and methods used. The use of computer-aided analysis software with a list of desirable capabilities recommended to conduct a modern short-circuit study is emphasized. Examples of system data requirements and result analysis techniques are presented. Keywords: ac decrement, asymmetrical fault current, available fault current, bolted fault, breaking capacity, breaking duty, data collection, dc component, dc decrement, dc offset, device duty calculation, fault calculation, fault duty, IEEE 3002.3, interrupting capacity, interrupting duty, making capacity, making duty, momentary capacity, momentary duty, short-circuit analysis, short- circuit current, short-circuit studies, short-circuit withstand, symmetrical component, symmetrical fault current, system modeling, system validation, X/R ratio • The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997, USA Copyright © 2019 by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Short Circuit Current Calculation and Prevention in High Voltage Power Nets

    Short Circuit Current Calculation and Prevention in High Voltage Power Nets

    Bachelor's Thesis Electrical Engineering June 2014 SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT CALCULATION AND PREVENTION IN HIGH VOLTAGE POWER NETS MD FARUQUL ALAM SALMAN SAIF HAMID ALI School of Engineering Blekinge Tekniska Högskola 371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden This thesis is submitted to the Faculty of Engineering at Blekinge Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering With Emphasis on Telecommunications. The thesis is equivalent to 10 weeks of full time studies. Contact Information: Author(s): Md Faruqul Alam E-mail: [email protected] Salman Saif E-mail: [email protected] Hamid Ali E-mail: [email protected] University Supervisor: Erik Loxbo School of Engineering University Examiner: Dr. Sven Johansson School of Engineering School of Engineering Internet :www.bth.se/com Blekinge Institute of Technology Phone : +46 455 38 50 00 SE-371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden Fax: +46 455 38 50 57 ABSTRACT This thesis is about calculating the short-circuit current on an overhead high voltage transmission line. The intention is to provide engineers and technicians with a better understanding of the risks and solutions associated with power transmission systems and its electrical installations. Two methods (“Impedance method” and “Composition method”) have been described to facilitate with the computation of the short-circuit current. Results yielded from these calculations help network administrators to select the appropriate protective devices to design a secured system. Description and implementation of these protective devices are explained and the procedure on how to ensure reliability and stability of the power system is shown. The “Composition method” deals with the concept of “short-circuit power”.
  • Introduction to Short Circuit Current Calculations

    Introduction to Short Circuit Current Calculations

    Introduction to Short Circuit Current Calculations Course No: E08-005 Credit: 8 PDH Velimir Lackovic, Char. Eng. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] Introduction to Short Circuit Current Calculations Introduction and Scope Short circuits cannot always be prevented so system designers can only try to mitigate their potentially damaging effects. An electrical system should be designed so that the occurrence of the short circuit becomes minimal. In the case short circuit occurs, mitigating its effects consists of: - Isolating the smallest possible portion of the system around the faulted area in order to retain service to the rest of the system, and - Managing the magnitude of the undesirable fault currents. One of the major parts of system protection is orientated towards short-circuit detection. Interrupting equipment at all voltage levels that is capable of withstanding the fault currents and isolating the faulted area requires considerable investments. Therefore, the main reasons for performing short-circuit studies are as follows: - Defining system protective device settings and that is done by quantities that describe the system under fault conditions. - Verification of the adequacy of existing interrupting equipment. - Assessment of the effect that different kinds of short circuits of varying severity may have on the overall system voltage profile. These calculations identify areas in the system for which faults can result in unacceptable voltage depressions. - Defining effects of the fault currents on various system components such as cables, overhead lines, buses, transformers, capacitor banks and reactors during the time the fault persists.
  • Capacitor and Inductors

    Capacitor and Inductors

    Capacitors and inductors We continue with our analysis of linear circuits by introducing two new passive and linear elements: the capacitor and the inductor. All the methods developed so far for the analysis of linear resistive circuits are applicable to circuits that contain capacitors and inductors. Unlike the resistor which dissipates energy, ideal capacitors and inductors store energy rather than dissipating it. Capacitor: In both digital and analog electronic circuits a capacitor is a fundamental element. It enables the filtering of signals and it provides a fundamental memory element. The capacitor is an element that stores energy in an electric field. The circuit symbol and associated electrical variables for the capacitor is shown on Figure 1. i C + v - Figure 1. Circuit symbol for capacitor The capacitor may be modeled as two conducting plates separated by a dielectric as shown on Figure 2. When a voltage v is applied across the plates, a charge +q accumulates on one plate and a charge –q on the other. insulator plate of area A q+ - and thickness s + - E + - + - q v s d Figure 2. Capacitor model 6.071/22.071 Spring 2006, Chaniotakis and Cory 1 If the plates have an area A and are separated by a distance d, the electric field generated across the plates is q E = (1.1) εΑ and the voltage across the capacitor plates is qd vE==d (1.2) ε A The current flowing into the capacitor is the rate of change of the charge across the dq capacitor plates i = . And thus we have, dt dq d ⎛⎞εεA A dv dv iv==⎜⎟= =C (1.3) dt dt ⎝⎠d d dt dt The constant of proportionality C is referred to as the capacitance of the capacitor.
  • BQ33100 Super Capacitor Manager Datasheet (Rev. C)

    BQ33100 Super Capacitor Manager Datasheet (Rev. C)

    Product Order Technical Tools & Support & Reference Folder Now Documents Software Community Design BQ33100 SLUS987C –JANUARY 2011–REVISED DECEMBER 2019 BQ33100 Super Capacitor Manager 1 Features 2 Applications 1• Fully integrated 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-series Super • RAID systems Capacitor Manager • Server blade cards • Can be used with up to 9-series capacitors • UPS without individual integrated capacitor monitoring • Medical and test equipment and balancing • Portable instruments • Active capacitor voltage balancing – Prevents super capacitor overvoltage during 3 Description charging The Texas Instruments BQ33100 Super Capacitor • Capacitor health monitoring Manager is a fully integrated, single-chip solution that – Capacitance learning provides a rich array of features for charge control, monitoring, and protection for either 2-, 3-, 4-, or 5- – ESR measurement series super capacitors with individual capacitor – Operation status monitoring and balancing or up to 9-series capacitors – State-of-charge with only the stack voltage being measured. With a small footprint of 7.8 mm × 6.4 mm in a compact 24- – State-of-health pin TSSOP package, the BQ33100 maximizes – Charging voltage and current reports functionality and safety while dramatically increasing – Safety alerts with optional pin indication ease of use and cutting the solution cost and size for super capacitor applications. • Integrated protection monitoring and control – Overvoltage Device Information(1) – Short circuit PART NUMBER PACKAGE BODY SIZE (NOM) – Excessive temperature BQ33100 TSSOP (24) 7.80 mm × 4.40 mm – Excessive capacitor leakage (1) For all available packages, see the orderable addendum at • 2-wire SMBus serial communications the end of the data sheet. • High-accuracy 16-bit delta-sigma ADC with a 16- channel multiplexer for measurement – Used for voltage, current, and temperature • Low power consumption – < 660 µA in NORMAL operating mode – < 1 µA in SHUTDOWN mode • Wide operating temperature: –40°C to +85°C Simplified Schematic DC INPUT PWR System Load Main Pwr Rail Memory, CPU, etc..
  • Short Circuit Current Rating August 2020

    Short Circuit Current Rating August 2020

    White Paper SCCR Technical Brief - Short Circuit Current Rating August 2020 HVAC Unit Overview 480 V The Short Circuit Current Rating (SCCR) states the maximum amperage (fault current) a component, enclosure, or unit can Bus feeder withstand during a short circuit event thereby limiting personal Branch circuit injury, damage to the premises, and damage to equipment. A fault feeding the floor 120 V occurs when a wiring error or failure inadvertently connects one phase directly to another or a phase to ground. The energized Branch panel circuit passes current that equals the available power of the Transformer distribution panel that feeds it. The excessive amperage is usually Meter: in orders of magnitude larger than the full load amps (FLA) of the Utility owned location varies HVAC unit. The excessive current can damage the equipment, cause Transformer a fire or an explosion. The net result of the electrical short can be catastrophic to equipment, the building, and most importantly 13.8 kV from utility 13.6 kV 480 V / XFMR SG occupant safety. Figure 1 shows a typical building electrical power 277 V Switchgear distribution where the entire design must be protected from a fault condition. The electrical system designer must design the lowest Figure 1. Typical building power distribution layout cost power distribution system for the building. The National Electrical Code (NEC) governs the calculation, product label, and application of SCCR as outlined in articles 110.9, 110.10, 409.22, 409.110, 440.4 (B), 670.3 (A)(4). For HVAC equipment the rules can be paraphrased as follows: • The HVAC equipment must have an SCCR equal to its fault current but no lower than a minimum of 5,000 A (5 kA) as ca.
  • System Impacts from Interconnection of Distributed Resources: DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Current Status and Identification of Needs for Further Development 5B

    System Impacts from Interconnection of Distributed Resources: DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Current Status and Identification of Needs for Further Development 5B

    Technical Report System Impacts from NREL/TP-550-44727 Interconnection of Distributed January 2009 Resources: Current Status and Identification of Needs for Further Development T.S. Basso Technical Report System Impacts from NREL/TP-550-44727 Interconnection of Distributed January 2009 Resources: Current Status and Identification of Needs for Further Development T.S. Basso Prepared under Task No. DP08.1001 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S.
  • Understanding the Charger's Contribution to a DC Arc Flash April 2016 Richard Hutchins R&D Specialist La Marche Mfg

    Understanding the Charger's Contribution to a DC Arc Flash April 2016 Richard Hutchins R&D Specialist La Marche Mfg

    Understanding the Charger's Contribution to a DC Arc Flash April 2016 Richard Hutchins R&D Specialist La Marche Mfg. Co. Des Plaines, IL 60018 Introduction In a typical DC system with batteries and chargers, a short circuit event will consist of some contribution from both the battery and the charger power sources. Generally, the battery contributes significantly more short circuit current than the charger, and therefore more incident energy into an arc flash. Many engineers seek to include the charger's contribution into the short circuit calculations as well. This paper attempts to give some insight towards understanding the charger's short circuit current. For the sake of clarity, this paper will not examine battery short circuits. The prime factors that influence a charger's short circuit current are the charger's topology, Over Current Protective Device (OCPD), control system dynamics, and the location of the short relative to the charger's output terminals. Chargers are available on the market in a variety of different topologies. For simplicity, charger topologies will be grouped into four categories; SCR, Ferro, Mag‐Amp, and Switch‐mode. Among the various manufacturers of chargers, there are certain degrees of design freedom towards attaining a successful product. In other words, different manufacturers of the same topology could have different design approaches to a viable and successful product, which cause the two designs to react differently to a short circuit event. Not all SCR chargers perform the same, not all Ferro's perform the same. Acceptable Outcomes of a Charger Short Circuit Test: Strictly speaking to a charger's short‐circuit performance, there are generally two acceptable scenarios; 1.
  • Application Guidelines for Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors

    Application Guidelines for Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors

    General Descriptions of Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors 1. General Description of Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors 1-1 Principles of Aluminum Electrolytic 1-2 Capacitance of Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors Capacitors An aluminum electrolytic capacitor consists of cathode The capacitance of an aluminum electrolytic capacitor aluminum foil, capacitor paper (electrolytic paper), may be calculated from the following formula same as for electrolyte, and an aluminum oxide film, which acts as the a parallel-plate capacitor. -- 8 εS dielectric, formed on the anode foil surface. C = 8.855 10 (µF) (1 - 1) A very thin oxide film formed by electrolytic oxidation d (formation) offers superior dielectric constant and has ε : Dielectric constant of dielectric rectifying properties. When in contact with an electrolyte, S : Surface area (cm2) of dielectric the oxide film possesses an excellent forward direction d : Thickness (cm) of dielectric insulation property. Together with magnified effective surface area attained by etching the foil, a high To attain higher capacitance "C", the dielectric constant capacitance yet small sized capacitor is available. "ε" and the surface area "S" must increase while the As previously mentioned, an aluminum electrolytic thickness "d" must decrease. Table 1-1 shows the capacitor is constructed by using two strips of aluminum dielectric constants and minimum thickness of dielectrics foil (anode and cathode) with paper interleaved. This foil used in various types of capacitors. and paper are then wound into an element and With aluminum electrolytic capacitors, since aluminum impregnated with electrolyte. The construction of an oxide has excellent withstand voltage, per thickness. And aluminum electrolytic capacitor is illustrated in Fig. 1-1.