DOCSLIB.ORG

Estonia Political Briefing: the New Estonian Government Has Been Formed: Reflections, Prospects, Concerns E-MAP Foundation MTÜ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estonia Political Briefing: the New Estonian Government Has Been Formed: Reflections, Prospects, Concerns E-MAP Foundation MTÜ ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 18, No. 1 (EE) May 2019 Estonia political briefing: The new Estonian Government has been formed: reflections, prospects, concerns E-MAP Foundation MTÜ 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 The new Estonian Government has been formed: reflections, prospects, concerns Having been extensively described in a number of our previous briefings, the process of voting for and then forming the newest governmental coalition in Estonia was arguably still within the framework of liberal democracy, but evidently stretching the boundaries of political ethic and generating plenty of justified concerns about the nation’s strategic agenda in years to come. In international media (for example, ‘Hard-Line Nationalists Affirmed as Part of Estonia’s Cabinet’1 in Bloomberg), the stories on Estonia as an e-country, which champions the digital world, started being substituted by a particular narrative that is directly associated with the Conservative People’s Party of Estonia (EKRE) and its activities. On the local ground, the current Prime Minister’s political movement – the Estonian Centre Party (Centre) – has already felt some severe consequences of their decision to form the post-elections governmental coalition with the EKRE. As reported, the ‘centrists’ are currently enjoying (is it a correct word, considering circumstances?) the support of 15.3% of the electorate, keeping in mind that they received 23.1% of the votes during the March 2019 parliamentary elections2. For Jüri Ratas and his party, such a drop in popularity means a significant gain for the competition – the oppositional Estonian Reform Party is the favourite for 34% of the prospective voters, boosting its elections-recorded figures by more than 5%3. At the same time, this is only the beginning of a fascinating story on what May 2019 has unloaded on the field of Estonian politics. Let us keep our seat belts fastened. On 24 April 2019, the Estonian President Kersti Kaljulaid appointed the Jüri Ratas-led Government into office4. The Prime Minister kept his previous job as well as the Minister of Defence (Jüri Luik, Pro Patria) and the Minister of Education and Research (Mailis Reps, Centre). Jaak Aab (Centre), being absent from the Government since May 2018, was appointed to hold the Regional Affairs portfolio. As for Urmas Reinsalu (Pro Patria), he left the Justice portfolio, of which he had been in charge for four years and in the previous two Governments, 1 Ott Ummelas ‘Hard-Line Nationalists Affirmed as Part of Estonia’s Cabinet’ in Bloomberg. 23 April 2019. Available from [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-23/hard-line-nationalists-approved-as-part- of-estonia-s-new-cabinet]. 2 ‘Party ratings: Support for Centre hits record low’ in ERR. 13 May 2019. Available from [https://news.err.ee/939035/party-ratings-support-for-centre-hits-record-low]. 3 ‘Party ratings: Support for Centre hits record low’. 4 ‘Estonian president appoints 3-party govt into office’ in Postimees. 25 April 2019. Available from [https://news.postimees.ee/6577846/estonian-president-appoints-3-party-govt-into-office]. 1 moving into Foreign Affairs. Finally, Tõnis Lukas (Pro Patria), the country’s former Minister of Education and Research on two occasions (1999-2002 and 2007-2011) got a job to lead the Ministry of Culture this time. Other than the aforementioned politicians, the remaining members of the newest Estonian governmental coalition are Ministers-neophytes. More specifically, on the EKRE side, the party’s representatives will be responsible for the following five portfolios: Finance (Martin Helme), the Interior (Mart Helme), Environment (Rene Kokk), Foreign Trade and Information Technology (Kert Kingo), and Rural Affairs (Mart Järvik)5. Immediately after the appointment of the Government, Mart Helme, the EKRE’s founding leader, while sounding like a Prime Minister, made a substantial statement in the context of the cabinet’s future steps: This is a government that will change the outdated practices concerning the budget, very many fossilized stances in Estonian politics, and, believe me, in four years, once this government has been in office, Estonia will have become significantly better and more democratic, the guarantee of this is that we will initiate the public initiative, the procedure of referendum6. The above message is of immense importance for the Republic of Estonia, because, should the new Government survive its battle against time, the opposition, and its internal conflicts that are obvious, there is a likelihood that the decision-making process in the country will start leaning towards engaging direct democracy-bound procedures on a regular basis. For Estonia, a parliamentary democracy, it will, with necessity, mean that the power of the Riigikogu will be significantly undermined. The regular usage of referenda is a practice that can be easily abused by those in power as it is conceptually bypassing the process of intra-parliamentary deliberation on an important issue – after all, on the elections day, the voters empower the MPs to make decisions on their behalf on the vast majority of policies, and if the MPs make a wrong call, then the voters change their mind during the next elections. In general, this has been a normal practice in Estonia, and the power of the Riigikogu has been enormously respected by the electorate. If this is time for a change, the change will have a tectonic impact on the parliamentary democracy-associated postulates in the Republic. The special attention to what Mart Helme says is not only justified by the peculiar political ‘aura’ of his party, but it has also a solid institutional backing – on 2 May, it was announced that whenever the Prime Minister is away from the country, his duties will be fulfilled by the 5 Valitsus. Available from [https://www.valitsus.ee/en]. 6 Mart Helme in ‘Estonian president appoints 3-party govt into office’. 2 Minister of the Interior7. It did not take long when the second-in-charge made international headlines – it happened during the first governmental press-conference that was held by Jüri Ratas together with his Ministers of the Interior and Foreign Affairs. The reference was made in regards of a particular situation when, during the new Government’s oath taking procedure at the Riigikogu, the Estonian President left her chair when Marti Kuusik, the then EKRE’s appointee for the post of the Minister of Foreign Trade and Information Technology, was giving his oath8. As CNN noted, Kuusik had to salute an empty chair, but the reason for the President’s ‘walkout’ was that the then appointed-for-a-moment Minister, as reported by Eesti Ekspress some time before the oath moment, would be facing “the allegations of domestic abuse against him” and that the police “swiftly launched a criminal investigation into Kuusik”9. At the time of the first governmental press-conference, Mart Helme had learn how to live with the fact that Kuusik had to resign, but the Estonian Minister of the Interior’s comments on the President had evidently broadened horizons of the possible, regarding the country’s contemporary political discourse: An emotionally fired-up woman can allow herself that. […] But Kersti Kaljulaid is n[o]t just a woman, but rather the President of the Republic. She reads one article, is so emotionally upset as a woman that she immediately passes judgment on the fly.10 Characteristically for the moment, the Prime Minister was sitting at the same table with Minister Helme, but did not make a strong effort to denounce the morally questionable statement of his colleague. As for the other members of the current Estonian Government, they decided to speak up a bit louder. Jaak Aab (Centre) was, perhaps, the first among the Ministers to publically react on the aforementioned press-conference: What happened in the Riigikogu may have been a little demonstrative. But something sounds a bit off with Mart making this level of criticism. He did n[o]t just critici[s]e the president, but 7 ‘Ratas appoints Mart Helme first substitute in absence of prime minister’ in ERR. 2 May 2019. Available from [https://news.err.ee/935364/ratas-appoints-mart-helme-first-substitute-in-absence-of-prime-minister]. 8 ‘President Kaljulaid ‘emotionally upset as a woman,’ says Helme’ in ERR. 2 May 2019. Available from [https://news.err.ee/935907/president-kaljulaid-emotionally-upset-as-a-woman-says-helme]. 9 Eliza Mackintosh, ‘Estonian interior minister calls first female president ‘emotionally upset woman’’ in CNN. 3 May 2019. Available from [https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/03/europe/estonia-minister-calls-female-president- emotional-scli-intl/index.html]. 10 Mart Helme in ‘President Kaljulaid ‘emotionally upset as a woman’. 3 tagged all women with the generalization that they are ‘over-emotional’. I certainly disapprove of that and the targeting of groups in society on the basis of gender or race.11 Then it was Jüri Luik (Pro Patria), the Minister of Defence, who gave his opinion on the issue during his interview to Postimees: I was not among the architects of this coalition. As concerns EKRE rhetoric, it is mostly up to the party themselves. EKRE leader Mart Helme has now said they do not plan to change their rhetoric. It is difficult for me to say how this will turn out in the long run. It is clear that a state’s international reputation depends directly on how its ministers act and speak. Every Estonian minister is seen as a representative of the country. I have immense respect for the office that I hold, and I approach it cautiously and calmly as opposed to taking risks or testing the limits in terms of my rhetoric, behaviour or something else.12 As for the Luik’s interview, the Minister did not hide away from the fact that he was not in favour of his party’s move to enter this particular governmental coalition; therefore, he was not planning to join the new government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identit〠E Democrazia
    Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
    [Show full text]
  • The Res Publica Party in Estonia
    Meteoric Trajectory: The Res Publica Party in Estonia REIN TAAGEPERA Formed in 2001, Res Publica won the Estonian parliamentary elections in 2003, and its leader became prime minister. It failed to win a single seat in the European Parliament in 2004 and was down to 5 per cent in opinion polls in 2005 when it dropped out of the cabinet. The founding chairperson of the party analyses here the causes for Res Publica’s rapid rise and fall, reviewing the socio-political background and drawing comparisons with other new parties in Europe. Res Publica was a genuinely new party that involved no previous major players. It might be charac- terized as a ‘purifying bridge party’ that filled an empty niche at centre right. Its rise was among the fastest in Europe. For success of a new party, each of three factors must be present to an appreciable degree: Prospect of success ¼ Members  Money  Visibility. Res Publica had all three, but rapid success spoiled the party leadership. Their governing style became arrogant and they veered to the right, alienating their centrist core constituency. It no longer mattered for the quality of Estonian politics whether Res Publica faded or survived. Key words: new parties; Estonia; Res Publica; rightist politics Democratization includes developing a workable party system. Around 2000, I would have told anyone who cared to listen that Estonia had too many parties. A study by Grofman, Mikkel and Taagepera1 also noted that no major new player had entered the field since 1995. We characterized the party constellation in the early 1990s as kaleidoscopic, but gave figures to show that the party system in Estonia seemed to stabilize.
    [Show full text]
  • Présidential Election in Estonia
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN ESTONIA 29th and 30th August 2011 European Elections monitor President of the Republic Toomas Hendrik Ilves is running for re-election as Head of Estonia from Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy The presidential election will take place on 29th and 30th August next in Estonia. The 101 members of the Riigikogu, the only chamber in Parliament, are being invi- ANALYSIS ted to appoint the new Head of State. Toomas Hendrik Ilves, the Head of State in 1 month before office, announced last December that he would be running for re-election. He has the poll the support of the Reform Party (ER) led by Prime Minister Andrus Ansip, the Pro Patria Union-Res Publica (IRL), member of the government coalition and the Social Democratic Party (SDE), T. Ilves’s party. The 23 MPs of the Pro Patria Union-Res Publica have 7) by the main opposition party, the Centre Party already signed a document expressing their support (KE), on 18th June last. Indrek Tarand is the son to the outgoing Head of State. “From our point of of former Prime Minister (1994-1995) and former view, thanks to his work, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, has MEP (2004-2009), Social Democrat, Andres Tarand. helped towards the development of civil society and In the last European elections on 4th-7th June 2009 has encouraged debate over problems that Estonia he stood as an independent and came second with has to face. The President of the Republic also suc- 25.81% of the vote, i.e. just behind the Centre Party ceeded in taking firm decisions during the crises that (26.07%) rallying a great number of protest votes the country experienced, such as for example, the to his name.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Estonia Country Report Table of Contents
    m o c 30 km . s p a m - 20 mi d © Maardu Tallinn Rakvere Kohtla- Sillamäe Narva Kiviõli Järve Jõhvi Keila Tapa Haapsalu Paide Jõgeva Viljandi Tartu Pärnu Kuressaare Põlva Võru Valga Republic of Estonia Country Report Table of contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 2 One of the three Baltic States occupied by the Soviet Union from 1940 until 1991, Estonia has made impressive economic and political progress since regaining independence. Read more. History ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Estonia, slightly smaller in area than New Hampshire and Vermont combined, is bordered by Latvia, Russia, the Baltic Sea, and the Gulf of Finland. Read more. Government and Economy.................................................................................................................................. 3 Estonia is a mature, stable parliamentary democracy with legislative, executive, and judicial branches, of which the unicameral Parliament (Riigikogu) holds the most power. Its 101 members are popularly elected every four years. Read more. Foreign Policy ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Estonia has good relations with its Baltic neighbors and is a member of the Council of Baltic
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Biograafiat-2021-June.Pdf
    101 BIOGRAPHIES The 14th Riigikogu June 17, 2021 Tallinn 2021 Compiled on the basis of questionnaires completed by members of the Riigikogu / Reviewed semi-annually Compiled by Marge Allandi, Rita Hillermaa and Piret Pärgma / Translated by the Chancellery of the Riigi- kogu / Estonian edition edited by Gerli Randjärv, English edition by Piret Pärgma / Cover by Tuuli Aule / Layout by Margit Plink / Photos by Erik Peinar ISSN 2674-3205 Copyright: Chancellery of the Riigikogu, National Library of Estonia CONTENTS Members of the 14th Riigikogu 3 Members of the Riigikogu by Constituency 114 Members of the Riigikogu by Faction 117 Members of the Riigikogu by Committee 120 Members of the Riigikogu Whose Mandate Has Been Suspended or Has Terminated 124 List of Riigikogus 148 Abbreviations and Select Glossary 149 CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 Members MEMBERS OF Merry Aart Uno Kaskpeit Kristen Michal Erki Savisaar THE 14TH RIIGIKOGU Annely Akkermann Erkki Keldo Marko Mihkelson Helir-Valdor Seeder Yoko Alender Kert Kingo Madis Milling Andrus Seeme Tiiu Aro Signe Kivi Aadu Must Sven Sester Riho Breivel Toomas Kivimägi Eduard Odinets Priit Sibul Dmitri Dmitrijev Aivar Kokk Jevgeni Ossinovski Riina Sikkut Ivi Eenmaa Rene Kokk Ivari Padar Imre Sooäär Enn Eesmaa Mihhail Korb Hanno Pevkur Mihhail Stalnuhhin Peeter Ernits Andrei Korobeinik Heljo Pikhof Timo Suslov Hele Everaus Siret Kotka Õnne Pillak Margit Sutrop Kalle Grünthal Heiki Kranich Siim Pohlak Aivar Sõerd Helle-Moonika Helme Igor Kravtšenko Kristina Šmigun-Vähi Anti Poolamets Mart Helme Eerik-Niiles Kross
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Biographies
    101 BIOGRAPHIES The 13th Riigikogu January 1, 2018 Tallinn 2018 Compiled on the basis of questionnaires completed by members of the Riigikogu Reviewed semi-annually Compiled by Gerli Eero, Rita Hillermaa and Lii Suurpalu Translated by the Chancellery of the Riigikogu Cover by Tuuli Aule Layout by Margit Plink Photos by Erik Peinar Copyright: Chancellery of the Riigikogu, National Library of Estonia CONTENTS 3 Members of the 13th Riigikogu 114 Members of the Riigikogu by Constituency 117 Members of the Riigikogu by Faction 120 Members of the Riigikogu by Committee 124 List of Riigikogus 125 Members of the Riigikogu Whose Mandate Has Been Suspended or Has Terminated 161 Abbreviations and Select Glossary 2 MEMBERS OF THE 13TH RIIGIKOGU MEMBERS OF Arto Aas Urmas Kruuse Marko Pomerants Jüri Adams Tarmo Kruusimäe Heidy Purga th THE 13 RIIGIKOGU Raivo Aeg Kalvi Kõva Raivo Põldaru Yoko Alender Külliki Kübarsepp Henn Põlluaas January 1, 2018 Andres Ammas Helmen Kütt Laine Randjärv Krista Aru Ants Laaneots Valdo Randpere Maire Aunaste Kalle Laanet Rein Randver Deniss Boroditš Viktoria Ladõnskaja Martin Repinski Dmitri Dmitrijev Maris Lauri Taavi Rõivas Enn Eesmaa Heimar Lenk Kersti Sarapuu Peeter Ernits Jürgen Ligi Erki Savisaar Igor Gräzin Oudekki Loone Helir-Valdor Seeder Helmut Hallemaa Inara Luigas Sven Sester Hannes Hanso Lauri Luik Priit Sibul Monika Haukanõmm Ain Lutsepp Arno Sild Mart Helme Jaak Madison Mihhail Stalnuhhin Martin Helme Jaanus Marrandi Anne Sulling Andres Herkel Andres Metsoja Märt Sults Remo Holsmer Kristen Michal Aivar Sõerd
    [Show full text]
  • The World Factbook Europe :: Estonia Introduction :: Estonia Background
    The World Factbook Europe :: Estonia Introduction :: Estonia Background: After centuries of Danish, Swedish, German, and Russian rule, Estonia attained independence in 1918. Forcibly incorporated into the USSR in 1940 - an action never recognized by the US - it regained its freedom in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Since the last Russian troops left in 1994, Estonia has been free to promote economic and political ties with the West. It joined both NATO and the EU in the spring of 2004, formally joined the OECD in late 2010, and adopted the euro as its official currency on 1 January 2011. Geography :: Estonia Location: Eastern Europe, bordering the Baltic Sea and Gulf of Finland, between Latvia and Russia Geographic coordinates: 59 00 N, 26 00 E Map references: Europe Area: total: 45,228 sq km country comparison to the world: 133 land: 42,388 sq km water: 2,840 sq km note: includes 1,520 islands in the Baltic Sea Area - comparative: slightly smaller than New Hampshire and Vermont combined Land boundaries: total: 633 km border countries: Latvia 343 km, Russia 290 km Coastline: 3,794 km Maritime claims: territorial sea: 12 nm exclusive economic zone: limits fixed in coordination with neighboring states Climate: maritime; wet, moderate winters, cool summers Terrain: marshy, lowlands; flat in the north, hilly in the south Elevation extremes: lowest point: Baltic Sea 0 m highest point: Suur Munamagi 318 m Natural resources: oil shale, peat, rare earth elements, phosphorite, clay, limestone, sand, dolomite, arable land, sea mud Land
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper No. 7: Report on Radical Right Populism in Estonia
    Populist rebellion against modernity in 21st-century Eastern Europe: neo-traditionalism and neo-feudalism Working Paper no. 7 Report on radical right populism in Estonia and Latvia Vassilis Petsinis and Louis Wierenga POPREBEL Working Paper series editors: Jan Kubik and Richard Mole This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 822682. POPREBEL Working Paper series POPREBEL (Populist rebellion against modernity in 21st-century Eastern Europe: neo-traditionalism and neo-feudalism) is a large Horizon 2020-funded research project on the rise of populism in Central and Eastern Europe. The aim of the project is to describe the phenomenon, create a typology of its various manifes- tations, reconstruct trajectories of its growth and decline, investigate its causes, interpret its meanings, diagnose its consequences and propose policy solutions. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 re- search and innovation programme under grant agreement No 822682. The POPREBEL consortium comprises six universities – UCL (co-ordinating insti- tution), University of Belgrade, Charles University, Corvinus University of Buda- pest, Jagiellonian University and University of Tartu – and Edgeryders, a social enterprise. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 822682. 2 1. Introduction This report provides a comprehensive overview of the latest developments among the populist and radical right-wing and other ‘anti-establishment’ parties in the Baltic States. It examines the intersections between programmatic prin- ciples and the patterns of policymaking among the two main populist and radical right-wing parties in Estonia (Estonian Conservative People’s Party/EKRE) and Latvia (National Alliance/NA).
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN ESTONIA 1st March 2015 European Elections monitor General Elections in Estonia: a more uncertain election than forecast Corinne Deloy Abstract : 979 910 Estonians are invited to vote on 1st March next to renew the 101 members of the Riigikogu, the only chamber in Parliament. These general elections are being held one year after the resignation of Andrus Ansip (Reform party, ER), who led Estonia for 9 years (2005-2014). Analysis Following the withdrawal of the head of government a new government coalition was formed. This combined the Reform Party and Sven Mikser’s Social Democratic Party (SDE) which is led by Taavi Roivas. 876 candidates from 10 parties i.e. +67 in comparison and almost all of the Russian-speakers (92%) do not with the last general elections on 6th March 2011, and believe there will be open conflict between Tallinn and 13 independents (-19) are running in this election. Moscow. Only six parties are presenting a list of 125 names: the Reform Party, the Centre Party (K), the Social On 5th September, two days after Barack Obama’s visit Democratic Party, Pro Patria and Res Publica Union to Tallinn, Russia’s domestic security services arrested (IRL), the People’s Conservative Party (EKRE) and the Eston Kohver. A member of the Estonian domestic Free Party of Estonia. security services and responsible for monitoring criminal groups suspected of smuggling on the Russian- 76,488 Estonians living abroad are allowed to vote in Estonian border, Mr Kohver is now in prison in Moscow these elections i.e.+26 838 than four years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Oral Answer
    Question for oral answer O-000038/2021 to the Commission Rule 136 Sylvia Limmer, Jaak Madison, Roman Haider, Simona Baldassarre, Luisa Regimenti on behalf of the ID Group Subject: Vaccination of children against COVID‑19 in the light of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union On Friday 28 May 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the BioNTech/Pfizer COVID‑19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15. Several Member States had, however, already cleared the way for the vaccination of children in advance of the EMA’s decision. Some experts have doubts about the vaccination of children, especially with regard to the available data on risk compared to the benefits of protection for children, given that most data suggests that they very rarely get severely ill. Some experts suggest that vaccination for children would only be advisable if they have severe pre- existing conditions. 1. Does the Commission agree with the view that the administration of vaccines to children needs to be restricted in the light of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, especially given that the ability of children to give consent is limited and all vaccines approved by the EMA merely enjoy conditional marketing authorisation (based on a substantially reduced database compared to the one normally required for vaccine licencing, the assumption being that the benefits outweigh the risks, and that much more comprehensive clinical data then have to be provided in order to maintain the conditional authorisation and for this authorisation to be converted into a standard marketing authorisation in the future)? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Main Political Attitudes and Arguments Prior to the Administra- Tive Reform: Why Was It Successful This Time?
    The Main Political Attitudes and Arguments Prior to the Administra- tive Reform: Why was it successful this time? ARGO IDEON Maaleht The first chance to decisively reduce the number of municipalities in Estonia slipped through politicians’ fingers at the beginning of this cen- tury. By early 2001, there had been extensive discussions on the imminent administrative reform for four years. A start was made in 1997 by Jaak Leimann, Mart Opmann and Raivo Vare, ministers in the government formed by the Coalition Party and the Rural People’s Union, with a pro- posal to reduce the number of municipalities to a third. By spring 2001, it did indeed seem that everything was almost ready. In the Ministry of the Interior, maps with new city and rural municipal borders were drawn, with around 60 to 110 possible new municipalities being envisaged. 51 As it happened, local elections were suitably due to be held in the autumn of 2002, conceivably within the redrawn borders. By that time, the Minister of the Interior, Tarmo Loodus (Pro Patria Union), had completed an almost impossible task – he had driven around Estonia and gain sup- port in several municipalities for changes that seemed inevitable. But nothing happened. A Reform Party board meeting on 20 March concluded with the politicians stating that the administrative reform had to be halted. ‘We should be honest about this and let the Estonian people know that there will be no administrative reform during this elec- tion period,’ said Andrus Ansip, vice chairman of the Reform Party at the time1. In public, the party justified its opposition by claiming that they would not support the government’s coercive merging of cities and rural municipalities.
    [Show full text]