DOCSLIB.ORG

Application for Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the Development of Gorakhpur Link Expressway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Application for Environmental Impact Assessment study for the Development of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Submission of Terms of Reference ( ToR) for Submitted by Proposed ToR for EIA Studies of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Project ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED GORAKHPUR LINK EXPRESSWAY PROJECT. Proposed Terms of Reference 1. Introduction Expressways are the highest class of roads in the Indian road network. In India, approximately 1450 km length of expressways are currently in operation. Government of India aims to expand the expressways in India to provide better connectivity between major cities and to strengthen Industrial growth in the country. In line with Central Government objectives, the state of Uttar Pradesh is the front runner in providing high-class expressways to the people of the State and the Country. Govt. of Uttar Pradesh (GoUP), has successfully developed 165 km Noida - Agra 6-Lane Access Controlled Expressway (Yamuna Expressway). India’s largest expressway viz. “Agra to Lucknow Access Controlled Expressway (Green Field) Project” has been constructed by the Authority in record time. Through these two access controlled expressways, the high speed connectivity of State Capital with National capital has been developed. Uttar Pradesh Expressways Industrial Development Authority (UPEIDA), has been entrusted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh for Development of Expressways thus improving the connectivity between major cities in the state of Uttar Pradesh. UPEIDA is also undertaking pre-feasibility studies for Bundelkhand Expressway for development of the region and providing impetus for inclusive growth. GoUP being committed for the overall development of the areas of Gorakhpur and Azamgarh region of the State, GoUP, though UPEIDA, has decided to develop “Gorakhpur Link Expressway” connecting Gorakhpur and Azamgarh with the State Capital, Lucknow through, Poorvanchal Expressway. 2. Project Background UPEIDA has decided to take up the development of 4 lane Access Controlled Gorakhpur Link Expressway (expandable to 6 lane) between Gorakhpur Bypass (NH-27 Chainage 258+600) starting 1.3 Km away from the underpass near Jaitpur to km 190+600 of Poorvanchal Expressway in the state of Uttar Pradesh for a length of 89+771 km, which will provide direct high speed connectivity of Eastern UP with entire State as well as National Capital Region (NCR), Bihar and West Bengal. The Authority is developing another 6 Lane Access Controlled Expressway “The Poorvanchal Expressway”, which will connect the existing Expressway corridor at Lucknow. This Expressway project shall create immense opportunities to the people of eastern region of the State and over all development of the State by providing high speed connectivity of East to West borders of the State and Page 1 of 13 Proposed ToR for EIA Studies of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Project with national capital. In order to cover additional area of Eastern UP, GoUP has decided to link Gorakhpur with the proposed Poorvanchal Expressway by developing a Green Field 4 Lane Access Controlled “Gorakhpur Link Expressway (expandable to 6 Lane) Objective of the present study is to understand and analyse the Environmental Impacts associated with the proposed expressway development project. 3. Location of Project Site The proposed expressway starts from the part of National Highway 27(NH 27 Chainage 258+600), a East - West National highway in India that starts from Porbandar and terminates in Silchar, the highway passes through the states of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Assam. The project road stretch starts at 1.3 km from underpass near Jaitipur at Gorakhpur and 3.7 km west from Gorakhpur – Mau intersection and ends at Poorvanchal Expressway, 8.3 km from Shahganj- Akbarpur road(SH 5) intersection of Poorvanchal expressway at chainage 190.600 km(towards Lucknow). The road runs East west between latitudes of 26º 43’ 0.15” N & 26º 12’ 8.22” and Longitudes of 83º 17’ 32.61” E & 82º 44’ 58 .89” E. The Expressway, once fully developed would connect Gorakhpur region with the state Capital via the proposed Purvanchal Expressway. The proposed expressway alignment passes through four major districts of Uttar Pradesh namely, Gorakhpur, Sant Kabir Nagar, Ambedkar Nagar and Azamgarh. The alignment crosses National Highway, State highway, MDRs and Village roads at different locations. Major road crossings are NH 27, SH 72, Rajesultanpur – Gorakhpur road, Khajini – Sikriganj – Rajesultanpur road, MDR 163E, Rajesultanpur – Tanda road, Atrulia – Ahiraula road and Jalalpur – Ramgarh road. It also crosses GAIL Pipe line at three locations. The proposed expressway alignment crosses major river Ghaghara at Km 46+000 and other rivers namely, Aami river, Kuwano river, Tons river, Choti Sarayu at different locations. The site locations is as shown in the Figure 1 below: Page 2 of 13 Proposed ToR for EIA Studies of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Project Figure 1. Location Map of Proposed Gorakhpur Expressway Link Project Page 3 of 13 Proposed ToR for EIA Studies of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Project 4. Expressway Facility Requirements Right of Way (RoW) for the project expressway is considered as 110 m with standard lane width of 3.75 m and depressed median. The project is proposed to be developed to 4 lane with paved shoulder expandable to 6 lanes divided carriageway with 15 meter depressed median for future widening. Design Speed of the expressway is 120km/hr on plain terrain and 100 Km/hr on rolling terrain with slope between 10 % to 25 %. The project corridor falls under Seismic Zone- III & IV which is a severe seismic zones. 4.1. Terrain The project road passes through plain and rolling terrain without much gradient change. The existing profile is plain in nature with gentle slope. 4.2. Built Up Areas The expressway is near major built up areas like Gorakhpur and Azamgarh. It also passes through minor built up areas like Khajini, Harnahi, Sikriganj, Bela Ghat, Kamhariaghat, Atraualia, Rajesultanpur and Jalalpur etc. and ends at Poorvanchal Expressway which is a major built up and developed area with both commercial establishments and residential settlements. 4.3. Key Structures Key structures in the proposed alignment includes interchange, major and minor bridge, vehicular underpass, light vehicular underpass, pedestrian under pass, wayside amenities and toll booths. The summery of key structures are given in the table below Table 1: List of key structures Sl. No. Structure Nos. 1 Interchange 5 2. Major Bridge 5 3. Minor Bridge 12 4. Vehicular Underpass 12 5. Light Vehicular Underpass 43 6. Pedestrian Underpass 27 7. Gail Pipe Line 3 8. Toll Booth 2 9. Wayside Amenities Facilities 2 Page 4 of 13 Proposed ToR for EIA Studies of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Project 4.4. Proposed Junctions/ Interchanges The proposed Gorakhpur Link Expressway crosses National Highways, State Highways, Major District roads and Village roads. Major roads coming along the alignment are NH 27, SH 72, Rajesultanpur – Tanda road and Deurpur road (NH 28). Minor roads crossing the alignment are Baradad – Jaitpur road, MDR 163E, Gorakhpur – Malhanpar Road, Sikriganj – Gorakhpur Road, Sikriganj – Belghat road, Atraualia – Ahiraula road and Jalalpur -Ramgrah road. Locations where alignment crosses major roads like NH, SH and MDR, interchanges shall be provided for the smooth flow of traffic. Vehicular Underpass (VUP)/Light Vehicular Underpass (LVUP) is proposed at minor road crossings for the crossing of traffic. Table 2: List of Interchanges SI No Chainage (km) Type of Interchange 1 0+000 Trumpet 2 12+250 Double Trumpet 3 27+600 Double Trumpet 4 62+100 Diamond 5 89+770 Trumpet Table 3: List of Vehicular Underpasses/Overpass SI Chainage Type of Structure SI No Chainage (km) Type of No (km) Structure 1 1+650 LVUP 29 44+125 LVUP 2 3+230 LVUP 30 46+855 VUP 3 6+490 LVUP 31 47+800 LVUP 4 8+792 LVUP 32 48+570 LVUP 5 9+218 VUP 33 49+870 LVUP 6 10+210 VUP 34 50+645 LVUP 7 11+420 LVUP 35 53+000 LVUP 8 12+255 VUP 36 55+095 LVUP 9 12+520 VUP 37 55+860 LVUP 10 12+825 VUP 38 57+570 LVUP 11 14+290 LVUP 39 60+140 LVUP 12 15+520 LVUP 40 63+080 LVUP 13 17+290 LVUP 41 64+510 VUP 14 18+490 LVUP 42 65+870 LVUP 15 19+790 LVUP 43 68+525 LVUP 16 21+750 LVUP 44 71+475 LVUP Page 5 of 13 Proposed ToR for EIA Studies of Gorakhpur Link Expressway Project SI Chainage Type of Structure SI No Chainage (km) Type of No (km) Structure 17 24+630 LVUP 45 73+310 LVUP 18 25+575 VUP 46 74+800 VUP 19 26+780 LVUP 47 75+250 LVUP 20 29+460 LVUP 48 76+565 LVUP 21 30+440 LVUP 49 79+770 LVUP 22 32+560 LVUP 50 81+620 LVUP 23 33+810 LVUP 51 82+805 VUP 24 34+795 LVUP 52 83+560 LVUP 25 35+735 LVUP 53 84+920 LVUP 26 36+845 VUP 54 87+140 LVUP 27 37+530 LVUP 55 88+088 LVUP Table 4: List of Pedestrian Underpasses SI No Chainage (km) SI No Chainage (km) 1 0+500 15 48+055 2 2+753 16 51+355 3 4+045 17 56+760 4 5+340 18 58+725 5 8+245 19 60+945 6 10+900 20 67+240 7 13+920 21 68+990 8 19+300 22 69+780 9 20+620 23 72+375 10 31+090 24 73+870 11 33+530 25 77+740 12 39+388 26 80+300 13 40+915 27 86+125 14 41+735 4.5. Water Bodies and Bridges The proposed Gorakhpur Expressway alignment crosses Six rivers namely, Aami River (7+300), Kuwano River(31+700), Ghaghara River(46+000), Choti Sarayu(63+700), Tons river (80+900) and Majohi river (88+500).
Recommended publications
  • Gandhi As Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921-2'

    Gandhi As Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921-2'

    Gandhi as Mahatma 289 of time to lead or influence a political movement of the peasantry. Gandhi, the person, was in this particular locality for less than a day, but the 'Mahatma' as an 'idea' was thought out and reworked in Gandhi as Mahatma: popular imagination in subsequent months. Even in the eyes of some local Congressmen this 'deification'—'unofficial canonization' as the Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, Pioneer put it—assumed dangerously distended proportions by April-May 1921. 1921-2' In following the career of the Mahatma in one limited area Over a short period, this essay seeks to place the relationship between Gandhi and the peasants in a perspective somewhat different from SHAHID AMIN the view usually taken of this grand subject. We are not concerned with analysing the attributes of his charisma but with how this 'Many miracles, were previous to this affair [the riot at Chauri registered in peasant consciousness. We are also constrained by our Chaura], sedulously circulated by the designing crowd, and firmly believed by the ignorant crowd, of the Non-co-operation world of primary documentation from looking at the image of Gandhi in this district'. Gorakhpur historically—at the ideas and beliefs about the Mahatma —M. B. Dixit, Committing Magistrate, that percolated into the region before his visit and the transformations, Chauri Chaura Trials. if any, that image underwent as a result of his visit. Most of the rumours about the Mahatma.'spratap (power/glory) were reported in the local press between February and May 1921. And as our sample I of fifty fairly elaborate 'stories' spans this rather brief period, we cannot fully indicate what happens to the 'deified' image after the Gandhi visited the district of Gorakhpur in eastern UP on 8 February rioting at Chauri Chaura in early 1922 and the subsequent withdrawal 1921, addressed a monster meeting variously estimated at between 1 of the Non-Co-operation movement.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    95067 Procurement Plan, RRP-II: U.P Aug 13 Revised Procurement Plan for the complete project Cycle for UP Rural Roads Project -II (PMGSY) effective 3rd September 2013 This is an indicative revised procurement plan prepared by the Project for the complete project cycle The Project shall update the Procurement Plan annually or Public Disclosure Authorized as needed throughout the duration of the project in agreement with the Bank to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. The Project shall implement the Procurement Plan in the manner in which it has been approved by the Bank. I. General Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan 3rd September 2013 1. 2. Date of General Procurement Notice issued for Consultancies only: September 14, 2010. Period covered by this procurement plan: June 2013 onwards.. II. Goods and Works 1. Procurement Methods and Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions shall be subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Public Disclosure Authorized Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement. Expenditure Category Procurement Method Prior Review Threshold Comments US$ GOODS, EQUIPMENT & MACHINERY 1. Goods and Equipment ICB All contracts World Bank SBD will be used and the estimated to cost equivalent of procurement will be as per procedures US$ 300,000 or more per described in World Bank Guidelines contract 2. Goods and Equipment NCB First contract for goods for The NCB bidding document agreed with estimated to cost less than each state , irrespective of GOI will be used and the procurement will US$ 300,000 and greater than value and all contracts be as per procedures described in the Public Disclosure Authorized US$ 100,000 equivalent per estimated to cost more than Procurement and Contract Management contract US$ 200,000 equivalent per Manual.
  • Ayodhya Page:- 1 Cent-Code & Name Exam Sch-Status School Code & Name #School-Allot Sex Part Group 1003 Canossa Convent Girls Inter College Ayodhya Buf

    Ayodhya Page:- 1 Cent-Code & Name Exam Sch-Status School Code & Name #School-Allot Sex Part Group 1003 Canossa Convent Girls Inter College Ayodhya Buf

    DATE:27-02-2021 BHS&IE, UP EXAM YEAR-2021 **** FINAL CENTRE ALLOTMENT REPORT **** DIST-CD & NAME :- 62 AYODHYA PAGE:- 1 CENT-CODE & NAME EXAM SCH-STATUS SCHOOL CODE & NAME #SCHOOL-ALLOT SEX PART GROUP 1003 CANOSSA CONVENT GIRLS INTER COLLEGE AYODHYA BUF HIGH BUF 1001 SAHABDEENRAM SITARAM BALIKA I C AYODHYA 73 F HIGH BUF 1003 CANOSSA CONVENT GIRLS INTER COLLEGE AYODHYA 225 F 298 INTER BUF 1002 METHODIST GIRLS INTER COLLEGE AYODHYA 56 F OTHER THAN SCICNCE INTER BUF 1003 CANOSSA CONVENT GIRLS INTER COLLEGE AYODHYA 109 F OTHER THAN SCICNCE INTER BUF 1003 CANOSSA CONVENT GIRLS INTER COLLEGE AYODHYA 111 F SCIENCE INTER CUM 1091 DARSGAH E ISLAMI INTER COLLEGE AYODHYA 53 F ALL GROUP 329 CENTRE TOTAL >>>>>> 627 1004 GOVT GIRLS I C GOSHAIGANJ AYODHYA AUF HIGH AUF 1004 GOVT GIRLS I C GOSHAIGANJ AYODHYA 40 F HIGH CRF 1125 VIDYA DEVIGIRLS I C ANKARIPUR AYODHYA 11 F HIGH CRM 1140 SARDAR BHAGAT SINGH HS BARAIPARA DULLAPUR AYODHYA 20 F HIGH CRM 1208 M D M N ARYA HSS R N M G GANJ AYODHYA 7 F HIGH CUM 1265 A R A IC K GADAR RD GOSAINGANJ AYODHYA 32 F HIGH CRM 1269 S S M HSS K G ROAD GOSHAINGANJ AYODHYA 26 F HIGH CRM 1276 IMAMIA H S S AMSIN AYODHYA 15 F HIGH AUF 5004 GOVT GIRLS I C GOSHAIGANJ AYODHYA 18 F 169 INTER AUF 1004 GOVT GIRLS I C GOSHAIGANJ AYODHYA 43 F OTHER THAN SCICNCE INTER CRF 1075 MADHURI GIRLS I C AMSIN AYODHYA 91 F OTHER THAN SCICNCE INTER CRF 1125 VIDYA DEVIGIRLS I C ANKARIPUR AYODHYA 7 F OTHER THAN SCICNCE INTER CRM 1138 AMIT ALOK I C BODHIPUR AMSIN AYODHYA 96 F OTHER THAN SCICNCE INTER CUM 1265 A R A IC K GADAR RD GOSAINGANJ AYODHYA 74
  • Defence Industrial Corridor in Uttar Pradesh

    Defence Industrial Corridor in Uttar Pradesh

    Defence Industrial Corridor in Uttar Pradesh ... विकास की साझेदारी, सुरक्षा की ज़ि륍मेदारी ADVANTAGE UTTAR PRADESH Country’s 4th largest state, 3rd largest economy Home to 16.5% of India’s population Largest market and consumerplace Amongst the top 5 manufacturing state 2nd highest number of SMEs in India 13.26% growth in exports (CAGR) (2012-17) DEFENCE & AEROSPACE SECTOR Existing Manufacturing base List of Prominent Ordnance Factories in UP 1. Ordnance Factory, Kanpur Home to prominent PSUs – 2. Small Arms Factory, Kanpur Three HAL manufacturing units, Nine Ordnance 3. Field Gun Factory, Kanpur Factories, Bharat Electronics Ltd, etc. 4. Ordnance Equipment Factory, Kanpur 5. Ordnance Parachute Factory, Kanpur 6. Ordnance Equipment Factory, Tundla R&D and Innovation Base 7. Ordnance Factory, Korwa 8. Ordnance Factory, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad Key R&D institutes including DRDO, ASERDC-HAL, etc. • 9. Ordnance Clothing Factory, Shahjahanpur • Prominent Forensics Science Laboratories List of Prominent manufacturing units of HAL 1. HAL Transport Aircraft Division, Kanpur 2. HAL Accessories Division Lucknow 3. HAL Avionics Division Korwa Others - 1. Bharat Electronics Ltd, Ghaziabad 2. Naini Aerospace Ltd – HAL The Announcement Announced by Hon’ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi at UP Investors Summit in February 2018 Worth INR 20,000 crore proposed in Bundelkhand region Estimated to create over 2.5 lakh employment opportunities DEFENCE CORRIDOR Contours ► Passing through Aligarh, Agra, Jhansi, Chitrakut including Kanpur, Lucknow ► These
  • Social Impact Assessment Report

    Social Impact Assessment Report

    SIA Report of Bundelkhand Expressway Project in District Banda, UP, India SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Bundelkhand Expressway, District Banda, UP, India Submitted to District Collector Banda, Uttar Pradesh Social Responsibility Asia (SR Asia) 4F-CS-25 Ansal Plaza Mall, Vaishali Sector 1 Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India [email protected] 0 | P a g e S R A S I A SIA Report of Bundelkhand Expressway Project in District Banda, UP, India ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Report is a result of the work executed by SR Asia as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and UP Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Rules, 2016. The research team had extensive consultation with the officials of Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, public representatives and Project Affected Families (PAFs) of 26 villages of Banda District for collecting valuable inputs, data on local ecology, culture and socio-economic profiles. We extend our sincere thanks to all the Office of Collectorate, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms for their continuous support and cooperation. They have been extremely supportive throughout the study with respect to project related information, documents and providing guidance to the team in Banda The team is grateful to the Project Affected Families (PAFs) and local representatives for their time and feedbacks. We appreciate the efforts made by all the participants of this study and thank them for their support. Birendra Raturi International Director, SR Asia 1 | P a g e S R A S I A SIA Report of Bundelkhand Expressway Project in District Banda, UP, India TABLE OF CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .........................................................................................................................
  • National Highways Authority of India

    National Highways Authority of India

    NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (An Autonomous Body under the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India) (Constituted on June 15, 1989 by an Act of Parliament - The National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988) INR 30,000,000,000 7.30 per cent. Synthetic INR Notes due 18 May 2022 Issue price: 100.00 per cent. The INR 30,000,000,000 7.30 per cent. Synthetic INR Notes due 18 May 2022 (the "Notes") will be issued by the National Highways Authority of India (the "Issuer"). The Notes will constitute direct, unsubordinated, unconditional and unsecured obligations of the Issuer and shall, at all times, rank pari passu and without any preference or priority among themselves and shall also rank pari passu with all other present and future direct, unsubordinated, unconditional and unsecured obligations of the Issuer (subject to any obligations preferred under mandatory provisions of the law prevailing from time to time). The Notes will settle in U.S. dollars. The Issue Price will be payable in U.S. dollars in the amount of USD 466,531,787.14 at the agreed conversion rate of INR 64.3043 per one U.S. dollar, such conversion rate reported by the Reserve Bank of India ("RBI") and displayed on Reuters page "RBIB" at approximately 1:30 p.m., Mumbai time, on 12 May 2017. The Notes mature on 18 May 2022. The Notes are also subject to redemption in whole, at their principal amount, together with accrued interest, at the option of the Issuer at any time prior to the Maturity Date in the event of certain changes affecting taxation in India, subject to RBI consent.
  • Infrastructure Roads & Highways Sector Report

    Infrastructure Roads & Highways Sector Report

    INDIA UNDER BHARATMALA Connecting India’s Road network INFRASTRUCTURE ROADS & HIGHWAYS SECTOR REPORT Infrastructure – Roads and Highways Road sector to look up post a forgettable FY19 The Road sector has faced rough weather in FY19 owing to a) overall Overall awarding nosedives in FY19 for Road projects weakness in project awarding, b) delays in financial closure for Awarding Construction Hybrid Annuity projects, and c) poor response to second bundle of (km per day) 50 47 Toll Operate Transfer (TOT) projects. Although most decent-sized 44 45 road contractors have achieved financial closure for their projects, 40 issues like receipt of appointed date yet remain as industry woes. 35 30 28 27 FY19 ended with awarding and construction of 5,489 km and 30 22 23 constructed 10,855 km respectively (FY18 awards at 17,055 km and 25 17 construction at 9,829 km). 20 15 12 However, the tender pipeline and commentary from contractors 15 suggest FY20 to be better in terms of project awarding. The existing 10 heavy order backlog of contractors and strong tender pipeline places 5 the sector in a sweet spot. Our top picks in this space are PNC 0 Infratech and HG Infra. FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Source: Media Reports, YES Sec – Research; Data for Ministry of Roads including NHAI Road sector FY19 highlights – Awarding muted; Construction robust After ending FY18 with massive order awarding of 17,055 km, some Exhibit 2: Stock coverage Rev PAT slowdown was expected. However, awarding literally dried up in Mcap CMP Target CAGR CAGR P/E Company (Rs.
  • List of Class Wise Ulbs of Uttar Pradesh

    List of Class Wise Ulbs of Uttar Pradesh

    List of Class wise ULBs of Uttar Pradesh Classification Nos. Name of Town I Class 50 Moradabad, Meerut, Ghazia bad, Aligarh, Agra, Bareilly , Lucknow , Kanpur , Jhansi, Allahabad , (100,000 & above Population) Gorakhpur & Varanasi (all Nagar Nigam) Saharanpur, Muzaffarnagar, Sambhal, Chandausi, Rampur, Amroha, Hapur, Modinagar, Loni, Bulandshahr , Hathras, Mathura, Firozabad, Etah, Badaun, Pilibhit, Shahjahanpur, Lakhimpur, Sitapur, Hardoi , Unnao, Raebareli, Farrukkhabad, Etawah, Orai, Lalitpur, Banda, Fatehpur, Faizabad, Sultanpur, Bahraich, Gonda, Basti , Deoria, Maunath Bhanjan, Ballia, Jaunpur & Mirzapur (all Nagar Palika Parishad) II Class 56 Deoband, Gangoh, Shamli, Kairana, Khatauli, Kiratpur, Chandpur, Najibabad, Bijnor, Nagina, Sherkot, (50,000 - 99,999 Population) Hasanpur, Mawana, Baraut, Muradnagar, Pilkhuwa, Dadri, Sikandrabad, Jahangirabad, Khurja, Vrindavan, Sikohabad,Tundla, Kasganj, Mainpuri, Sahaswan, Ujhani, Beheri, Faridpur, Bisalpur, Tilhar, Gola Gokarannath, Laharpur, Shahabad, Gangaghat, Kannauj, Chhibramau, Auraiya, Konch, Jalaun, Mauranipur, Rath, Mahoba, Pratapgarh, Nawabganj, Tanda, Nanpara, Balrampur, Mubarakpur, Azamgarh, Ghazipur, Mughalsarai & Bhadohi (all Nagar Palika Parishad) Obra, Renukoot & Pipri (all Nagar Panchayat) III Class 167 Nakur, Kandhla, Afzalgarh, Seohara, Dhampur, Nehtaur, Noorpur, Thakurdwara, Bilari, Bahjoi, Tanda, Bilaspur, (20,000 - 49,999 Population) Suar, Milak, Bachhraon, Dhanaura, Sardhana, Bagpat, Garmukteshwer, Anupshahar, Gulathi, Siana, Dibai, Shikarpur, Atrauli, Khair, Sikandra
  • Construction and Infrastructure- Mar'21

    Construction and Infrastructure- Mar'21

    Construction and Infrastructure- Mar’21 VP Research: Shravan Shah Associate: Maulik Shah/Parth Bhavsar Tel: +91 22 40969749 Tel: +91 22 40969775 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]/[email protected] April 09, 2021 April 09, 2021 2 Monthly Update - Mar 2021 Announcement of New Investments . New investments announced up by 75.4% YoY to Rs1,722 bn (up 60.3% MoM) ACIL in Mar’21, primarily due to increase in Roads/ Power which was partially offset CMP / Target by fall in Others/ Railway. New investments announced in FY21 decreased Rs293/Rs326 13.4% YoY to Rs10,595.1 bn owing to the fall in Others/ Railways which was 3 partially offset by rise in Manufacturing/ Roads. DBL . Manufacturing segment saw a major portion of new investments with 35.5% CMP / Target Rs 575 / Rs 569 share followed by Roads/ Power at 20.6%/ 15.0% in Mar’21 HG Infra . Higher concentration of new investments announced was seen in Odisha with 30.8% share followed by Uttar Pradesh with 14.2% share. CMP / Target Rs 2 83 / Rs 410 . Major Projects announced in Mar’21 includes Integrated Steel Plant (Kendrapada) (Rs500 bn), Ganga Expressway (Ubariya Khurd-Sarso) Project J Kumar (Group-III) (Rs58.1 bn) and Pumped Storage Hydel Power (Shahpur) Project CMP/ Target Rs 1 93 / Rs 267 (Rs118.8 bn) KNR Tenders Published CMP / Target Rs 218 / Rs 240 . Tenders issued increased 82.4% YoY to Rs835.7 bn in Mar’21 led by Roads/ Irrigation. Tenders published in FY21 increased 44.4% YoY to Rs7,981.7 bn, led NCC by rise in Roads/ Mining/ Water.
  • District Population Statistics, 32-Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh

    District Population Statistics, 32-Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh

    I Census of India, 1951 DISTRICT POPULATllON STATiSTICS UTTAR PRADESH 32-GORAKHPUR DISTRICT ,I 315.42 \'LLAHAJ~AD : ~G AND STA;TIONERY. UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA 1951 1953 I GORDPS Price, Re.1-S. OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2011 [LIBRARY] Class No._ 315.42 Book No._ 1951 GOR DPS 21236 Accession No. ________ LED CASTES IN UTTAR PRADESH (1) Throughout the State- (1) Agariya (22) Bhuyiar (43) Kanjar (2) Badi (23) Boria (44) Kapariya (3) Badhik (24) Chamar (45) Karwal (4) Baheliya (25) Chero (46) Khaiz-aha (5) Baiga (26) Dabgar (47) Kharot (tJ) Baiswar (27) Dhangar (48) Kharwar (excluding BenbfUlsi) (1) Bajaniya (28) Dhanuk (49) Kol (8) Bajgi (29) Dharkar (50) Korwa (9) Ba.lahar (30) Dhpbi (51) Lalbegi (10) Ba.!miki (31) Dhusia or Jhusifl (52) Majhwar (II) Ba.ngaU (32) Dom (53) Nat (2) Banmanus (33) Domar (54) Pankha CD} Bansphor (34} Dusadh (55} Parahiya (14) Barwar (35) aharami (56) Pasi (15) Basor (36) Ghasiya (57) Patsri (16) Bawariya (37) GuaI (58) Rawat (7) Beldar (33) Habura (59) Saharya (18) Bedya (39) Hari (60) Sana.urhiya (19) Bhantu (40) Hela, (61) Sansiya (20) Bhoksa (41) Jatava (62) Shilpkar (21.) Bhuiya (42] Kalabaz (63) Turaiha (2) In Bunrlelkhand Division and the portion of Mirzapur District, south of Kai'l16ur Range- Gond FOREWORD THE Uttar Pradesh Government asked me in March, 1952, [0 supply them for the purposes of elections to local bodies population statistics with separation for scheduled castes (i) mohalla/ward -wise for urban areas, and (ii) vil1age~wise for rural areas.
  • Annexure-V State/Circle Wise List of Post Offices Modernised/Upgraded

    Annexure-V State/Circle Wise List of Post Offices Modernised/Upgraded

    State/Circle wise list of Post Offices modernised/upgraded for Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) Annexure-V Sl No. State/UT Circle Office Regional Office Divisional Office Name of Operational Post Office ATMs Pin 1 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA PRAKASAM Addanki SO 523201 2 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL KURNOOL Adoni H.O 518301 3 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VISAKHAPATNAM AMALAPURAM Amalapuram H.O 533201 4 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL ANANTAPUR Anantapur H.O 515001 5 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Machilipatnam Avanigadda H.O 521121 6 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA TENALI Bapatla H.O 522101 7 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Bhimavaram Bhimavaram H.O 534201 8 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA VIJAYAWADA Buckinghampet H.O 520002 9 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL TIRUPATI Chandragiri H.O 517101 10 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Prakasam Chirala H.O 523155 11 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL CHITTOOR Chittoor H.O 517001 12 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL CUDDAPAH Cuddapah H.O 516001 13 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM Dabagardens S.O 530020 14 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL HINDUPUR Dharmavaram H.O 515671 15 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA ELURU Eluru H.O 534001 16 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Gudivada Gudivada H.O 521301 17 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Gudur Gudur H.O 524101 18 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL ANANTAPUR Guntakal H.O 515801 19 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA
  • Kibithoo Can Be Configured As an Entrepôt in Indo- China Border Trade

    Kibithoo Can Be Configured As an Entrepôt in Indo- China Border Trade

    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Kibithoo Can Be Configured as an Entrepôt in Indo- China Border Trade JAJATI K PATTNAIK Jajati K. Pattnaik ([email protected]) is an Associate Professor, at the Department of Political Science, Indira Gandhi Government College, Tezu (Lohit District), Arunachal Pradesh Vol. 54, Issue No. 5, 02 Feb, 2019 Borders are the gateway to growth and development in the trajectory of contemporary economic diplomacy. They provide a new mode of interaction which entails de-territorialised economic cooperation and free trade architecture, thereby making the spatial domain of territory secondary in the global economic relations. Taking a cue from this, both India and China looked ahead to revive their old trade routes in order to restore cross-border ties traversing beyond their political boundaries. Borders are the gateway to growth and development in the trajectory of contemporary economic diplomacy. They provide a new mode of interaction which entails de-territorialised economic cooperation and free trade architecture, thereby making the spatial domain of territory secondary in the global economic relations. Taking a cue from this, both India and China looked ahead to revive their old trade routes in order to restore cross-border ties traversing beyond their political boundaries. The reopening of the Nathula trade route in 2016 was realised as a catalyst in generating trust and confidence between India and China. Subsequently, the success of Nathula propelled the academia, policymakers and the civil society to rethink the model in the perspective of Arunachal Pradesh as well. So, the question that automatically arises here is: Should we apply this cross-border model in building up any entrepôt in Arunachal Pradesh? The response is positive and corroborated by my field interactions at the ground level.