Prince George's County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prince George's County Abstract Title: Approved Central Annapolis Road Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment Author: The aryland-NationalM Capital Park and Planning Commission Subject: Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for Central Annapolis Road Date: October 2010 Source of Copies: The aryland-NationalM Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 (301) 952-3195 Series Number: 2114102306 Number of Pages: 194 Abstract: The 2010 Approved Central Annapolis Road Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment (SMA) was prepared to amend portions of the 1994 Bladensburg-New Carrollton and Vicinity Approved Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment. The plan also amends the 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan and the 2009 Approved Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. Developed with broad public participation, this document presents background information, the plan vision, and a discussion of the three primary elements that frame that vision – The Road, The Corridor, and The Community. The plan contains policies and strategies for land use, economic development, transportation systems, urban design, and revitalization, and envisions a livable, pedestrian-friendly, and vibrant community in the sector plan area. The creation of mixed-use development and commercial centers will attract new residents, quality retail, and jobs while preserving and strengthening the existing residential neighborhoods. The SMA implements zoning changes to allow implementation of the plan vision and the land use concepts in the sector plan. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George’s County Samuel J. Parker, Jr., AICP, Chairman Jack B. Johnson, County Executive Françoise Carrier, Vice Chairman County Council Officers Patricia Colihan Barney, Executive Director The County Council has three main responsibilities in the planning process: Joseph Zimmerman, Secretary-Treasurer (1) setting policy, (2) plan approval, and (3) plan implementation. Applicable policies are incorporated into area plans, functional plans, and the Prince George’s Adrian R. Gardner, General Counsel County Approved General Plan. The County Council, after holding a hearing on the plan adopted by the Planning Board, may approve the plan as adopted, approve the plan with amendments based on the public record, or disapprove the plan and return it to the Planning Board for revision. Implementation is The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bicounty agency, created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission’s primarily through adoption of the annual Capital Improvement Program, the annual budget, the water and sewer plan, and adoption of zoning map geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties: the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC amendments. planning jurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties. Council Members The Commission has three major functions: • The preparation, adoption, and, from time to time, amendment or extension of the General Plan for the physical development of the Maryland‑Washington Thomas E. Dernoga, 1st District, Council Chairman Regional District. Will Campos, 2nd District • The acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of a public park system. Eric Olson, 3rd District • In Prince George’s County only, the operation of the entire county public recreation program. Ingrid M. Turner, 4th District Andrea C. Harrison, 5th District, Council Vice Chair The Commission operates in each county through a Planning Board appointed by and responsible to the county government. All local plans, recommendations Samuel H. Dean, 6th District on zoning amendments, administration of subdivision regulations, and general administration of parks are responsibilities of the Planning Boards. Camille Exum, 7th District Tony Knotts, 8th District The Prince George’s County Department of Planning (M-NCPPC): Marilynn Bland, 9th District • Our mission is to help preserve, protect and manage the county’s resources by providing the highest quality planning services and growth management guidance and by facilitating effective intergovernmental and citizen involvement through education and technical assistance. Clerk of the Council • Our vision is to be a model planning department of responsive and respected staff who provide superior planning and technical services and work cooperatively with decision-makers, citizens and other agencies to continuously improve development quality and the environment and act as a catalyst for Redis C. Floyd positive change. Prince George’s County Planning Board Montgomery County Planning Board Samuel J. Parker, Jr., AICP, Chairman Françoise Carrier, Chairman Sylvester J. Vaughns, Vice Chairman Marye Wells-Harley, Vice Chairman Sarah Cavitt Joseph Alfandre Jesse Clark Norman Dreyfuss John H. Squire Amy Presley Foreword Plan Contents The Prince George’s County Planning Board of The Maryland-National Capital Planning Commission is pleased to make available the 2010 Central Annapolis Setting the Stage Challenges 27 Opportunities 27 Road Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment. This community-based plan and sectional map amendment (SMA) provide a clear vision for the future The Purpose of the Sector Plan 1 transformation of the Central Annapolis Road Corridor from an auto‑dominated roadway into a series of vibrant, transit‑friendly walkable nodes. In particular, Plan Area and Regional Setting 2 the plan envisions the creation of a new transit village at the intersection of Annapolis Road and Veterans Parkway where a future Purple Line light rail transit Public Involvement station is planned. Planning Context 2 Planning Process 29 1997 Maryland Smart Growth and Public Meetings 30 Policy guidance for this plan came from the 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan, the 1994 Bladensburg-New Carrollton and Vicinity Approved Neighborhood Conservation Act 2 Kick-Off Meeting and Listening Session 30 Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment, and the 2009 Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. The goals, concepts, guidelines, and public participation One Maryland: Smart, Green, and Growing 2 Planning and Design Workshop 31 program, approved by both the Planning Board and the District Council in June and July 2009 respectively, outlined the major issues in the area and provided 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan 3 Presentation of Draft Recommendations 32 the structure for this plan. Public participation from September 2009 to January 2010 consisted of a series of interviews with community leaders, business 1994 Bladensburg-New Carrollton and Vicinity Master Presentation of Preliminary Recommendations and owners, developers, county officials, and municipal officials; and meetings with community organizations, a kickoff public meeting, a three-day charrette, a Plan and Sectional Map Amendment 4 Action Plan 33 post-charrette meeting, and a final public meeting. Other Planning Initiatives 4 The Purple Line 5 Vision for the Corridor Central Annapolis Road represents an untapped opportunity to create a livable, pedestrian-friendly, and vibrant community. This plan represents the county’s vision of a revitalized, livable, and vibrant community within the Central Annapolis Road sector plan area. It also completes county planning activities for this Relevant Infrastructure Studies 6 Vision: The Road 36 historic road, which connects the District of Columbia and Annapolis, Maryland and is one of seven General Plan-designated Corridors. The plan recommends 2005 Approved Countywide Green Infrastructure Plan 6 Vision: The Corridor 37 the creation of a new regional commercial retail center and the creation of a new transit village at the intersection of a planned Purple Line light rail transit 2008 Approved Public Safety Facilities Master Plan 6 Vision: The Community 38 2009 Approved Countywide Master Plan of Transportation 6 station. The plan also recommends the redevelopment of underutilized commercial uses into transitional mixed‑use areas. It envisions the long‑term From Vision to Concept transformation of Annapolis Road into a pedestrian- and bike-friendly Complete Street that serves and enhances new development while helping to safeguard existing communities. The sectional map amendment implements the plan’s vision and land use concepts. Existing Conditions Central Annapolis Road’s four subareas 39 Community and Corridor Profile 7 The Plan Concept 41 The Planning Board appreciates the contributions and active involvement of the community and stakeholders in this innovative planning effort. We look forward Development Pattern, Land Use, and Zoning 8 Area A: Transit-Oriented Development at Annapolis to continued collaboration to implement the plan’s recommendations and achieve the vision for a transformed Central Annapolis Road Corridor. Introduction 8 Road and Veterans Parkway 41 Sincerely, Existing Land Use 8 Area B: Single-Family, Residential Neighborhood 41 Existing Zoning 11 Area C: Mixed-Use Transition Area 41 Infrastructure Elements 11 Area D: Retail Center around Capital Plaza 41 Environmental Infrastructure 11 From Concept to Plan Transportation Systems 14 Samuel J. Parker, Jr., AICP Public Facilities 20 Introduction 43 Chairman Parks and Recreation 23 Vision 45 Prince George’s County Planning Board Economic Development and Housing 24 Roadway 46 Economic Development: Market Context
Recommended publications
  • Highest and Best Use Analysis Redevelopment Site Located at 5801 and 5809 Annapolis Road Cheverly, MD
    Highest and Best Use Analysis Redevelopment site located at 5801 and 5809 Annapolis Road Cheverly, MD Prince Georges County Redevelopment Authority | February 2018 www.greendooradvisors.com Executive Summary Green Door Advisors (GDA) was retained by Prince George’s County Redevelopment Authority (Redevelopment Authority) to conduct a highest and best use market analysis for a proposed development at 5801 and 5809 Annapolis Road within the town limits of Cheverly, MD. The Redevelopment Authority previously issued an RFP for development of this site, and it was planned for the development of 244 luxury two-bedroom condominium units priced from $300,000 to $350,000, but the selected developer was unable to execute the development agreement. In 2013, GDA completed a residential market and financial analysis to help determine whether the original disposition agreement was viable given the residential market, it was determined that the original program was not financially feasible given market conditions. Now that the Redevelopment Authority is preparing to issue a new solicitation for redevelopment of the subject property, GDA has completed a follow-up study to determine the highest and best use for the site based upon current market conditions. This study examines the market opportunity for multiple potential product types including hotel, rental and for-sale housing, office, and retail development. The following table presents a summary of the market opportunity for each of the product types: Product Type Level of Opportunity Summary Hotel Strong • Opportunity for 95-115-room Limited Service Hotel by 2020/2021. • Subject site is established hotel location. Condominiums Low • No condominiums actively selling in the market area.
    [Show full text]
  • Abuse of Prisoners Detailed
    M V Dance Classes Forming Now! Ballroom Salsa • Swing 4 weeks $49 703-528-9770 Next to dancefactory.com VA SQ :IN;EB<:MBHGH? uPPP'P:LABG@MHGIHLM'<HF(>QIK>LLuC:GN:KR**%+)).u-- 5A44++ Mn^l]Zr 8=0D6DA0C8>=?A4?kB4CC8=6C74BC064 0QdbT^U ?aXb^]Tab 3TcPX[TS %2)#$2!0%24(%7()4%(/53%!0 MkbZe[^`bgl_hkÌkbg`e^Z]^kÍ "USHCONGRATULATES!BBASONHISELECTIONWIN Zmghmhkbhnl:[n@akZb[ FPa\FT[R^\T)6WWVh 5>AC7>>3C4G0BkMa^Zee^`^]kbg`e^Z]^k YZXaVgZYl^ccZg^cEVaZhi^c^Vc h_ma^:[n@akZb[ikblhgl\Zg]Zep^gmhg mkbZeFhg]Zrpbmapbmg^ll^lm^eebg`Zfbeb& kdiZ07jh]ZmiZcYh^ck^iVi^dcq% mZkr\hnkmma^rpZm\a^]abfing\aZgBkZjb bgfZm^bgma^_Z\^Zg]lZpabfeZn`apabe^ _hk\bg`ikblhg^klmhihl^gZd^]' Bc^a\5a^]c)GV^c^c8Va^[# Li\'<aZke^l@kZg^kCk'blma^_bklmlhe]b^k ig^\\ZghYZVYanbjYha^YZq" Z\\nl^]bgma^l\Zg]Zemh`hhgmkbZe'Abl\Zl^ m^lmlZgZk`nf^gminm_hkma[r]^_^gl^Zmmhk& g^rlmaZmma^lhe]b^klp^k^hk]^k^]mhlh_m^g 1d\AP_)Bdhh ni]^mZbg^^l_hkbgm^kkh`ZmhklZg]aZ]gh a^`Zanid[VXZV[^cZ \ahb\^[nmmhh[^r' :fbebmZkr`nZk]m^l& [dgegZiZcY^c\ mb_b^]Fhg]ZrmaZma^ idbddc[Vch^c lZp@kZg^king\aZg '%2!,$(%2"%24!0 BkZjb]^mZbg^^bgma^_Z\^ # <gZZc7Vn q ?0ACH?;0C5>A<)%DDIE3IMPKINSOF$+0AINTINGAPPLIESACOATOFPAINT-ONDAYTOTHECAMERA Zfhf^gmZ_m^kZghmhkb& PLATFORMATTHE#APITOLNEARTHESITEOF0RESIDENT"USHSINAUGURATIONNEXTWEEK4HESWEARING IN hnliahmhpZlmZd^gZm 4=C4AC08=<4=C ISEXPECTEDTOCOSTTHE$ISTRICTMILLIONFW^_Phb.;^RP[[TPSTabfP]cUTSTaP[WT[_k?PVT( :[n@akZb[ikblhg' 'RANER Li\'FZmma^pPbl]hf% 5`;fYYb\Zih ma^_bklmpbmg^llbg@kZg^kÍlikblhg^kZ[nl^ B^d[BdaeXe^a) \hnkm&fZkmbZe%]^l\kb[^]Zikhfbg^gmiahmh V`^X`ÅVcYV]^iÅ _khf:[n@akZb[maZmlahp^]ma^fnl\neZk djid[h^c\^c\VWdji
    [Show full text]
  • 0Qqpb FX]B ?P[Tbcx]XP] E^Ct
    M V ONE EZ way to get aBSinDCPDQ Washington DC Campus See ad inside :IN;EB<:MBHGH? uPPP'P:LABG@MHGIHLM'<HF(>QIK>LLuC:GN:KR*)%+)).u-- 5A44++ Fhg]Zr 0QQPbFX]b?P[TbcX]XP]E^cT mbhgh_i^Z\^mZedlfnlm[^ IkZ`fZmb\ln\\^llhkmh:kZ_ZmkZbl^likhli^\mh_i^Z\^mZedl Z\\hfiZgb^][rlp^^ibg` A0<0;;07F4BC10=:kFZafhn]:[[Zl mbhgZe\hffngbmr%pZl^qi^\m^]mhnla^k IZe^lmbgbZgk^_hkfl%\Zee^] pZl^e^\m^]IZe^lmbgbZg:nmahkbmrik^lb& bgZg^p^kZ%Z_m^k_hnk]^\Z]^lh_\aZhmb\ :[[ZlÍ^e^\mbhgÊZablmhk& ]^gm[rZpb]^fZk`bgLng]Zr%^qbmiheel Zg]\hkknimbhg&kb]]e^]kne^[rRZll^k:kZ_Zm% b\]Zr_hkma^IZe^lmbgbZg lahp^]%`bobg`abfZ]^\blbo^fZg]Zm^mh pah]b^]Gho'**' i^hie^'Ë k^g^pi^Z\^mZedlpbmaBlkZ^e%k^bgbgfbeb& :[[Zl%ihineZkerdghpgZl:[nFZs^g% :[[ZlÍihebmb\Zeh[c^\& mZgmlZg]mkrmh^g]fhk^maZg_hnkr^Zklh_ aZlikhfbl^]mhk^_hkfma^IZe^lmbgbZg !BBAS mbo^lZk^ma^lZf^Zl 4/.9+!25-"!!&0 Fb]^Zlm[ehh]la^]' :nmahkbmr%ho^kaZnema^ngpb^e]rIZe^lmbgbZg :kZ_ZmÍl3ZIZe^lmbgbZg 3UDANESEYOUTHCELEBRATEINTRADITIONALGARB Ma^ob\mhkrh_ma^lmZb]Zg]ikZ`fZmb\ l^\nkbmrl^kob\^lZg]jnb\derk^lnf^g^`hmbZ& lmZm^bgma^P^lm;Zgd%@ZsZLmkbiZg]^Zlm :[[Zl%pahaZllihd^ghnmZ`Zbglmobh& mbhglpbmaBlkZ^e%lmZee^]_hk_hnkr^Zkl' C^knlZe^f%Zg]Zlhenmbhg_hkIZe^lmbgbZgk^_n& BdSP]?TPRT)6[iZg'&nZVgh e^g\^Zg]aZlma^[Z\dbg`h_ma^bgm^kgZ& Ik^lb]^gm;nla%pahaZllZb]Zk^lnfi& `^^lZg]ma^bk]^l\^g]Zgml'A0E8=4BB<0=0? VcY'b^aa^dcYZVi]h!X^k^alVg ZcYhl^i]h^\c^c\d[igZVinq% F8;320A3F44:4=3k?4HC>=½B?;024 3TPS[hAT_aXbP[)<>h`^aa- 0FPa]X]V V[iZgXdckdnWdbWZY^c>gVfq$ C^Cbd]P\X 6[^ah6^]T) GZ[aZXi^dch 0XSF^aZTab 10=3002478=3>=4B80kBg]hg^lbZpZkg^] dci]ZZcY Zb]phkd^klLng]ZrmaZml^iZkZmblmk^[^el d[V\daYZc
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Opportunities Guide 301-583-4650 •
    RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES GUIDE 301-583-4650 • www.pgcedc.com 1 Vision Statement To attract and retain the most Experienced workforce who will use Innovative technology to provide ecient, eective services to our citizens. We will Collaborate with our stakeholders to develop Solutions that are data-based and rely on best-practices to address complex challenges within the county and the region. We will have a world-class education system, safe communities and a robust economy that creates jobs and opportunities for all and increases the commercial tax base to ensure we can provide the services our residents deserve. ALSOBROOKS PRIORITIES Education Transportation & Infrastructure Crime Reduction & Safe Neighborhoods Youth Development Economic Development Procient & Transparent Government Quality of Life & Environment 2 CONTENTS Greetings . 4 Why Prince George’s . 6 County Profile . 6 County Amenities . 8 Profiles in Retail . 9 Upcoming Projects . 12 Map of Shopping Center Profiles . 13 Shopping Center Profiles . 14 Andrews Manor . 14 Ritchie Station Marketplace . 44 Beltway Plaza . 16 Riverdale Park Station . 46 Bowie Marketplace . 18 The Shoppes at New Carrollton . 48 Bowie Town Center . 20 The Shops at Iverson . 50 Brandywine Crossing . 22 South Lake . 52 Cadillac Crossing . 24 Tanger Outlets National Harbor . 54 Capital Plaza . 26 Towne Centre at Laurel . 56 Carillon . 28 Towne Square at Suitland Centre at Forestville . 30 Federal Center . 58 Hampton Park . 32 University Town Center . 60 HEATHER R . TINELLI Kettering Plaza & Largo Plaza . 34 Vista Gardens West . 62 Director of Business Development The Landing at Woodyard . 36 Westphalia Town Center . 64 Retail & Restaurants Woodmore Commons . 66 301-583-4617 The Mall at Prince Georges .
    [Show full text]
  • 3Q08 Property List Reformatted for Supplement
    Property List For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 Investor Relations Department 3300 Enterprise Parkway • Beachwood, Ohio 44122 (216) 755-5500 • (216) 755-1500 (fax) www.ddr.com Developers Diversified Realty Quarterly Financial Supplement For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 PROPERTY LIST YEAR DDR'S OWNED & TOTAL DEVELOPED/ YEAR EFFECTIVE MANAGED ANNUALIZED LOCATION CENTER NAME/ADDRESS MSA REDEVELOPED ACQUIRED INTEREST OWNED GLA GLA BASE RENT ANCHOR TENANTS (LEASE EXPIRATION) ALABAMA 1 BIRMINGHAM, AL (BROOK) BROOK HIGHLAND PLAZA BIRMINGHAM 1994/2003 1994 100.0% 424,341 551,258 $4,247,331 DICK'S SPORTING GOODS(2017), LOWE'S(2023), STEIN MART(2011), OFFICE MAX(2011), MICHAEL'S(2014), HOMEGOODS(2016), BOOKS- A-MILLION(2010), ROSS DRESS FOR LESS(2014) 5291 HWY 280 SOUTH 2 BIRMINGHAM, AL (EASTWOOD) EASTWOOD FESTIVAL CENTRE BIRMINGHAM 1989/1999 1995 100.0% 300,280 463,560 $1,082,029 DOLLAR TREE(2013), BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY(2013), WESTERN SUPERMARKETS(NOT OWNED), HOME DEPOT(NOT OWNED) 7001 CRESTWOOD BLVD 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL (RIVER RIVER RIDGE BIRMINGHAM 2001 2007 15.0% 172,304 349,804 $2,782,985 STAPLES(2016), LINENS 'N THINGS(2012), BEST BUY(2017), SUPER RIDGE) TARGET(NOT OWNED) US HIGHWAY 280 4 BIRMINGHAM, RIVERCHASE PROMENADE (I) BIRMINGHAM 1989 2002 14.5% 120,108 228,416 $1,686,360 MARSHALLS(2009), GOODY'S(NOT OWNED), TOY'S R US(NOT AL(RIVERCHASE) OWNED) MONTGOMERY HIGHWAY 5 CULLMAN, AL LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT CULLMAN 1998 2007 100.0% 101,287 101,287 $682,500 LOWE'S(2015) 1717 CHEROKEE AVE SW 6 DOTHAN, AL (CIRCUIT CITY) CIRCUIT CITY DOTHAN 2004 2007 100.0% 33,906 33,906 $567,926 CIRCUIT CITY(2020) 2821 MONTGOMERY HWY 7 DOTHAN, AL(SHOPS) SHOPS ON THE CIRCLE DOTHAN 2000 2007 100.0% 149,085 149,085 $1,651,947 OLD NAVY(2010), T.J.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL AVENUE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Prince George’S County, Maryland June 15, 2006
    CENTRAL AVENUE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Prince George’s County, Maryland June 15, 2006 FINAL Project For: Prepared By: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) In Cooperation with: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) Parsons Brinckerhoff Prince George’s County Planning Department Bay Area Economics Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Stull+Lee Architects Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Project Purpose Project Partners Context 4 Study Area Planning Context Why Now? Existing Conditions, Opportunities and Challenges 7 Physical Profile Historic and Cultural Resources Transportation and Safety Data Community Concerns, Comments, and Vision 17 Corridor Strengths/Corridor Weaknesses Examples of Places People Like Central Avenue in 10 Years TOD Corridor Development Concept 21 Foundational Elements Goals Development Concept Corridor Elements 24 Benefits Circulation and Safety Street Improvements Gateways Land Use Green Network Noise Pollution Management Prince George’s County, Maryland 1 Center Elements 47 Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Capitol Heights Metro Community Center and Addison Road Metro Community Center Hill Road Metro Regional Center (Proposed) and Morgan Boulevard Metro Regional Center Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Implementation 66 Appendix I - V 74 2 Central Avenue TOD Corridor Development Strategy INTRODUCTION Project Purpose The purpose of the Central Avenue TOD Corridor Development Strategy is to create a comprehensive development approach for the corridor that: 1. Takes advantage of its location and transportation resources; 2. Provides opportunities to unify and strengthen the corridor’s identity; 3. Creates attractive pedestrian- and transit-oriented places; and 4. Facilitates public facilities financing and timely construction.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOPPING CENTERS in the MARYLAND/DC/VA AREA Commuter Student Involvement
    SHOPPING CENTERS IN THE MARYLAND/DC/VA AREA Commuter Student Involvement www.union.umd.edu/csi Arundel Mills 7000 Arundel Mills Cir. Fair Oaks Mall Hanover, Md., 21076 11750 Fair Oaks 410-540-5110 Fairfax, Va., 22033 Hours: 10 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. M-S 703-359-8300 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sun Hours: 10 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. M-S http://www.arundelmillsmall.com/ 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sun www.shopfairoaksmall.com Beltway Plaza Mall 6000 Greenbelt Road Fashion Centre at Pentagon City Greenbelt, Md., 20770 1100 S. Hayes St. 301-474-2683 Arlington, Va., 22202 Hours: 10 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. M-S 703-415-2400 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. Sun Hours: 10 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. M-S www.beltwayplazamall.com 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sun www.simon.com/mall/default.aspx?ID=157 Boulevard at the Capital Centre Lottsford Road and Arena Drive Free State Shopping Center Largo, Md., 20774 15500 Annapolis Road 301-333-2583 Bowie, Md., 20715 Hours: 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. M-S 301-464-1911 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sun Website Unavailable Website Unavailable Iverson Mall Bowie Town Center 3737 Branch Ave. 15606 Emerald Way Hillcrest Heights, Md., 20748 Near Mitchellville Road 301-423-7400 Bowie, Md., 20774 Hours: 10 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. M-S 301-860-1818 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sun Hours: 10 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technologic Command. the Demolition Is Inside the Building Itself, Becoming an Autoplastic Moment, the Paradigm Is the Digital Architecture
    THE TECHNOLOGIC COMMAND. THE DEMOLITION IS INSIDE THE BUILDING ITSELF, BECOMING AN AUTOPLASTIC MOMENT, THE PARADIGM IS THE DIGITAL ARCHITECTURE. POLITICS ENVIRONMENT POLITICS ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY SOCIETY SOCIETY SOCIETY POLITICS TECHNOLOGY ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY Technology as the dominant force in the contemporary context as stated by Agamben Alloplastic Demolition Autoplastic Demolition in the τέχνη Age: in the Technology Age: demolition as creative usage demolition as command HARDWOOD WINDOWS 50 STEEL WINDOWS 50 COPPER PIPEWORK 47 ALUMINIUM WINDOWS 44 STRUCTURAL GLASS CURTAIN WALLING 43 ALUMINIUM DECKING TO FLAT ROOF 39 COMPOSITE CLADDING SYSTEM 38 INSULATION TO FLAT ROOF 36 SOFTWOOD WINDOWS 36 FOUNDATIONS 110 INTERNAL GLASS DOOR 29 TIMBER JOISTS 90 RADIATORS 29 BRICKWORK 86 LIGHT SWITCH 27 TIMBER PITCHED ROOF 84 SPRINKLER HEAD 26 STEEL FRAME 83 SUSPENDED CEILINGS 24 CONCRETE FRAME 81 PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB 78 INTERNAL FLEXIBLE DOOR 18 CONCRETE STAIRS 74 AIR-CONDITIONING CHILLER 17 STEEL AND REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR 71 AIR-CONDITIONING HEATER 17 TIMBER FRAME 69 VINYL SHEET FLOOR COVERING 17 SOFTWOOD STAIRS 64 AIR-CONDITIONING FAN 15 TILE COVERING TO PITCHED ROOF 64 CARPET FLOOR COVERING 13 PAINT 5 COPPER SHEET COVERING 63 WALL PAPER 4 STEEL STAIRS 59 FLUORESCENT TUBE 4 INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULB 2 CHIPBOARD DECKING TO TIMBER JOISTS 51 0 25 years 50 years 75 years 100 years highest rate of obsolescence highest rate of demolition slowest rate of obsolescence slowest rate of demolition Technology enters the building Assemblage of failures 5 4 3 2 1 (1) Objects (2) Plan (3) Services (4) Skin (5) Structure A building can be understood as a assem- blage of systems with various rate of technological obsolescence.
    [Show full text]