DOCSLIB.ORG

New Building at the Knesset Domain Written by Bonnie Evans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Building at the Knesset Domain Written by Bonnie Evans New Building at the Knesset Domain Written by Bonnie Evans Photography: Itzik Marom, of Architecture of Israel Published in Architecture of Israel 77, 5/2009 After the establishment of the State of Israel, the Knesset wandered between buildings in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem before reaching, in 1950, the Fromin House on King George St. - a building originally planned as a bank. In 1957 an architectural competition was held for the permanent building on Givat Ram. However, the winning architect Yosef Klarwein was obliged to consult with the office of veteran architect Dov Karmi. Ram Karmi, who then worked in the office of his father as a young architect, proposed an alternative model, which ultimately served as the basis for the building’s image in its existing form, finalized in 1966. Planned in 1981, the new Negba wing contained a 330-seat auditorium and 48 chambers for top MKs who had begun to employ secretaries and parliamentary assistants. As the wing was located on the bottom level, its presence was barely noticed, but thanks to the carpeted corridors, the chambers were eventually nicknamed “Hiltons”. During the 14th Knesset (1996-1999), it was decided to extend the building and add 60 new chambers. With the opening of the 15th Knesset in 1999, a tender was announced for the planning of the new Kedma wing. Following the first sifting of the few proposals submitted, a short list remained from which the N.Meltzer-G.Igra Architects proposal was chosen. The winning proposal was finalized together with the steering committee headed by MK Meir Shitrit. Its main idea was to create a graded building according to the inclined topography, in order to avoid superceding the existing building. In addition to the new chambers, place was allotted to new halls of the Knesset committees; an office wing for the auxiliary units; an energy center to serve all the buildings of the domain; a new entrance pavilion including sophisticated means of control for the many visitors; a new arcaded gate to replace the old Palombo Gate; and an underground parking house beneath the Knesset Square to replace the parking lots scattered in and outside of the Knesset domain. The final plan was developed as a master plan authorized in 2000. The Knesset management decided to carry out the work according to the “plan, implement, maintain” method. Namely - the contractor would complete the planning with his team of planners and consultants, construct the building, and maintain it for 25 years. The advantage of the method lies in the contractor’s interest in erecting a building whose maintenance is economic over time - a rather rare phenomenon here; its clear shortcoming - the lack of a democratic process of choosing a planner by an open architectural competition. And the consolation: although the implementing contractor had the option to exchange the architect, he preferred to work with a planning team headed by the winning office. Construction began at the end of 2001 and ended in 2007. It was conducted in stages, due to the representational nature of the site and the Knesset’s ongoing activities. Hence, alternate parking areas were allotted, and the machine rooms were built prior to the main buildings. Although the area of the Knesset was doubled with the completion of the new wing, the representational presence of the original building has been preserved, and the old interior - renovated. The inner courtyards, planned originally by Klarwein but only implemented in the new wing, render its inhabitants space of retreat, on the background of restrained building details. Openness to the view has prominently improved the connection with the city, after years of seclusion in the governing ivory tower. Architects: N. Meltzer - G. Igra - A. Cohen Ptrogramme: Engineer Dror Nir, architect David Shlesky Interior Design: Leora Vinograd, Tamar Carmi The Knesset domain from the northeast The new functional entrance with the old building in the background The renewed plaza built above a new underground parking facility The renewed plaza built above a new underground parking facility The colorful display of artist Uri Dever helps conceal the new wing, preserving the independent facade of the old building Lobby of the committees building The MK chambers building Northern facade of the committees building The round committee hall Passageway in the MK chambers building Passageway in the committees building Courtyard of the lobby in the committees building . Courtyard of the lobby in the committees building Courtyard in the MK chambers building Courtyard in the MK chambers building where a Second Temple burial system was discovered The new entrance gate, with the renovated old Palombo Landscape development along the main access road Gate relocated to its right echoes the graded addition .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exporting Zionism
    Exporting Zionism: Architectural Modernism in Israeli-African Technical Cooperation, 1958-1973 Ayala Levin Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Ayala Levin All rights reserved ABSTRACT Exporting Zionism: Architectural Modernism in Israeli-African Technical Cooperation, 1958-1973 Ayala Levin This dissertation explores Israeli architectural and construction aid in the 1960s – “the African decade” – when the majority of sub-Saharan African states gained independence from colonial rule. In the Cold War competition over development, Israel distinguished its aid by alleging a postcolonial status, similar geography, and a shared history of racial oppression to alleviate fears of neocolonial infiltration. I critically examine how Israel presented itself as a model for rapid development more applicable to African states than the West, and how the architects negotiated their professional practice in relation to the Israeli Foreign Ministry agendas, the African commissioners' expectations, and the international disciplinary discourse on modern architecture. I argue that while architectural modernism was promoted in the West as the International Style, Israeli architects translated it to the African context by imbuing it with nation-building qualities such as national cohesion, labor mobilization, skill acquisition and population dispersal. Based on their labor-Zionism settler-colonial experience,
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Constructs Fall 2017 Final.Indd 1 8/22/17 11:51 AM Fall 2017 Letter from the Dean, Events Calendar Deborah Berke
    CONSTRUCTS FALL 2017 Yale Constructs_Fall 2017_Final.indd 1 8/22/17 11:51 AM Fall 2017 Letter from the Dean, Events Calendar Deborah Berke Lectures Symposium All lectures begin at 6:30 p.m. (except where “Environment, Reconsidered: noted) in Hastings Hall (basement floor) The 50th Anniversary of the Masters of Paul Rudolph Hall, 180 York Street. Doors of Environmental Design Program, To the Yale School of Architecture community: open to the general public at 6:15 p.m. at the Yale School of Architecture” November 10 –11, 2017 My past year as dean has been marked by grand and granular When founded in 1967, the Masters of Envi- developments and characterized by constant learning. It has Aug 31 JANET MARIE SMITH ronmental Design (MED) program offered a been a thrill to gain such an immersive perspective on an institu- Edward P. Bass Distinguished radically new way to understand and study Visiting Architecture Fellow the built environment in an architecture tion to which I have been dedicated for such a long time. “The Diamonds of American Cities: school setting by proposing a new object of This past spring’s exhibitions included Archaeology of Runs, Hits, and Errors” study: an “environment” comprising not the Digital: Complexity and Convention (page 12) and our only masterpiece architecture but also struc- beloved year-end exhibition of student work. We brought in lec- tures of all kinds, such as infrastructure, Sep 7 SCOTT RUFF technological systems, natural elements, and turers whose work illuminates the theory and practice of the Louis I. Kahn Visiting Assistant symbolic systems as well as the forces that built environment arts (page 20).
    [Show full text]
  • "History Takes Place — Dynamics of Urban Change"
    Summer School in Tel Aviv–Jaffa "History Takes Place — Dynamics of Urban Change" 23-27 September 2019 REPORT hosted by Impressum Project Director Dr. Anna Hofmann, Director, Head of Research and Scholarship, ZEIT-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius, Hamburg [email protected] Project Manager Marcella Christiani, M.A., Project Manager Research and Scholarship, ZEIT-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius, Hamburg [email protected] Guy Rak, PhD, Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies, [email protected] Liebling Haus – The White City Center (WCC) Shira Levy Benyemini, Director [email protected] Sharon Golan Yaron, Program Director and Conservation Architect [email protected] Orit Rozental, Architect, Conservation Department, Tel Aviv-Jaffo Municipality Yarden Diskin, Research Assistant; MA Urban Planning (Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa) [email protected] Report: Dr. Anna Hofmann, Marcella Christiani Photos: © Yael Schmidt Photography, Tel Aviv: page 1 until 5, 6 below, 7, 10, 11, 12 above, 14, 15, 16 below and 17 others: Dr. Anna Hofmann and Marcella Christiani Photo Cover: Barak Brinker From 23 to 27 September 2019, the ZEIT-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius, in collaboration with the Gerda Henkel Foundation, organized the ninth edition of the Summer School “History Takes Place – Dynamics of Urban Change” in Tel Aviv-Jaffa (Israel), focusing on its Bauhaus heritage. Under the appellation of 'White City of Tel Aviv: The Modern Movement', it has been part of the UNESCO proclaimed World Heritage Site since 2003. Fourteen young historians, scholars in cultural studies and social sciences, artists, city planners and architects discovered the city, studying the connections between historical events and spatial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Opus 54. Eiermann, Wash, D
    Edition Axel Menges GmbH Esslinger Straße 24 D-70736 Stuttgart-Fellbach tel. +49-711-574759 fax +49-711-574784 Opus 71 Ram Karmi and Ada Karmi-Melamede, Supreme Court of Israel, Jerusalem With an introduction by Anne-Catrin Schultz and photographs by Richard Bryant. 56 pp. with 66 illus., 280 x 300 mm, hard- cover, English ISBN 978-3-932565-71-7 Euro 36.00, sfr 59.00, £ 29.00, US $ 49.00, $A 69.00 Intent on realizing her late husband’s vision, Dorothy de Rothschild first offered to provide funding for a new building housing the Su- preme Court of Israel in the 1960s. In 1983 the offer was seriously considered and accepted. Distributors Renowned architects from Israel and from all over the world entered into a two-stage competition in 1986. Ram Karmi and Ada Brockhaus Commission Karmi-Melamede, siblings their own architecture practices, were Kreidlerstraße 9 asked to compete as a team. Their contribution stood out clearly D-70806 Kornwestheim against the other entries. Instead of proposing a formal and monu- Germany mental scheme, the Karmis came up with a coherent site-specific tel. +49-7154-1327-33 building which roots itself into the land, continues the stone lan- fax +49-7154-1327-13 guage of Jerusalem, and relates to its unique vibrant light. [email protected] Pure geometrical volumes are arranged to form a balanced composition and complex whole. A careful equilibrium is created Buchzentrum AG between the gravity of local stone-masonry walls and the immateri- Industriestraße Ost 10 al play of light and shadow in the voids and volumes of the struc- CH-4614 Hägendorf ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Neues Bauen in Palästina (1923–1948)
    GEBR. MANN VERLAG ∙ BERLIN VERMITTLUNGSWEGE DER MODERNE — NEUES BAUEN IN PALÄSTINA (1923–1948) HERAUSGEGEBEN VON / EDITED BY THE TRANSFER OF JÖRG STABENOW RONNY SCHÜLER MODERNITY — ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM IN PALESTINE (1923–1948) 20181030_Neues-Bauen_Tagungsband_Buch.indb 3 31.10.18 11:34 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS / TABLE OF CONTENT I VERMITTLUNGSWEGE DER MODERNE / THE TRANSFER OF MODERNITY Ronny Schüler, Jörg Stabenow Einführung 9 Introduction 23 Burcu Dogramaci Akteure, Konzepte und Objekte in Bewegung: 37 Transferprozesse in der Architekturgeschichte der Moderne II VERNETZTE BIOGRAFIEN / INTERCONNECTED BIOGRAPHIES Ines Sonder Julius Posener und das Neue Bauen 53 in Palästina Edina Meyer-Maril Drei Frauen, drei Wege, eine Moderne: 69 Genia Averbuch, Judith Segall-Stolzer und Elsa Gidoni-Mandelstamm planen und bauen in Eretz Israel Ines Weizman Adolf Loos in Palestine 83 III MULTIPLIKATION DURCH AUSBILDUNG / MULTIPLICATION THROUGH EDUCATION Ita Heinze-Greenberg Der ‚Sprachenstreit‘ am Technion: 101 Alexander Baerwald und die Etablierung einer akademischen Architektenausbildung in Palästina Ulrich Knufinke Ausbildungs- und Karrierewege jüdischer Architekten 117 in der Weimarer Republik und in der Emigration: Überlegungen zu einem offenen Forschungsfeld IV DIE STRAHLKRAFT DER PROJEKTE / PROJECT AS AGENT Zvi Efrat Richard Kauffmann and the Zionist 129 Rural Mise-en-Scène Sigal Davidi The ‘New Architecture’ of the 1934 Levant Fair: 151 Constructing Identity for Jewish Society in Mandatory Palestine INHALTSVERZEICHNIS / TABLE OF CONTENT V DISKURSE
    [Show full text]
  • South African Know-How and Israeli Facts of Life: the Planning of Afridar
    Planning Perspectives ISSN: 0266-5433 (Print) 1466-4518 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rppe20 South African ‘know-how’ and Israeli ‘facts of life’: the planning of Afridar, Ashkelon, 1949–1956 Ayala Levin To cite this article: Ayala Levin (2017): South African ‘know-how’ and Israeli ‘facts of life’: the planning of Afridar, Ashkelon, 1949–1956, Planning Perspectives, DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2017.1389657 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2017.1389657 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 25 Oct 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 499 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rppe20 PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2017.1389657 South African ‘know-how’ and Israeli ‘facts of life’: the planning of Afridar, Ashkelon, 1949–1956 Ayala Levin Department of Art History, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS In 1949, in the newly founded state of Israel, South African architects Norman Garden suburb; Hanson and Roy Kantorowich planned the city of Ashkelon and, within it, the neighbourhood unit; south- exclusive neighbourhood unit Afridar. Managed by the South African Jewish south transnational planning; Appeal, which initiated and funded the project, Afridar presented a radical model town; native township; apartheid exception to Israel’s centralized planning approach during that period. An early example of a semi-private settlement initiative for an ethnic and class- based enclave reserved for ‘Anglo-Saxon’ Jewish immigrants, it functioned as a ‘model town’ for the immigrant population from the Middle East and North Africa, which was housed by the government in the rest of the city of Ashkelon.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism for the Future: an International Conference
    Modernism for the Future: An International Conference Conference Proceedings September 12–13, 2018, Kaunas, Lithuania European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018 Modernism for the Future 1 Organizers Kaunas – European Capital of Culture 2022 Lithuanian National Commission for UNESCO International Scientific Committee Edward Denison (The Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL) Marija Drėmaitė (Vilnius University) Giedrė Jankevičiūtė (Lithuanian Institute for Culture Research) Vaidas Petrulis (Kaunas University of Technology) Viltė Migonytė-Petrulienė (Vytautas Magnus University) Renata Kepežinskienė (Lithuanian National Commision for UNESCO) Vladimir Šlapeta (Brno University of Technology) Proceedings Editor: Vaidas Petrulis Language editor: George Vaitkunas Designer: Vytis Gruzdys Kaunas – European Capital of Culture 2022 kaunas2022.eu Kaunas, 2019 Copyright according to Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND, unless otherwise stated Terms on creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ ISBN 978-609-96109-0-0 2 Modernism for the Future 3 Contents INTRODUCTION 6 Approaches for the Conservation of 20th Century Architectural Heritage 140 Vaidas Petrulis (The Madrid Document): A Good Example to be Followed Fernando Espinosa de los Monteros OPENING SESSION SESSION IV – Artistic interpretations of Modernism Self-Realization of the Newly Liberated: Architecture in the Baltic States 10 Between the World Wars Why Do We Need to Decentre Modernism? Art History and 150 Mart Kalm Avant-Garde Art from the Periphery Partha Mitter SESSION I – National Modernisms
    [Show full text]
  • The Knesset Building in Giv'at Ram: Planning and Construction
    The Knesset Building in Giv’at Ram: Planning and Construction Originally published in Cathedra Magazine, 96th Edition, July 2000 Written by Dr. Susan Hattis Rolef Introduction Already in the early days of modern Zionism, it was clear to those who envisioned the establishment of a Jewish State, and those who acted to realize the vision, that once it was established, it would be a democracy, in which a parliament would be built. In his book Altneuland (written in 1902), Theodor Herzl, described the parliament of the Jewish state in Jerusalem in the following words: “[A] great crowd was massed before (the Congress House). The election was to take place in the lofty council chamber built of solid marble and lighted from above through matte glass. The auditorium seats were still empty, because the delegates were still in the lobbies and committee rooms, engaged in exceedingly hot discussion…" 1 In his book Yerushalayim Habnuya (written in 1918), Boris Schatz, who had established the Bezalel school of arts and crafts, placed the parliament of the Jewish State on Mount Olives: "Mount Olives ceased to be a mountain of the dead… it is now the mountain of life…the round building close to [the Hall of Peace] is our parliament, in which the Sanhedrin sits".2 When in the 1920s the German born architect, Richard Kaufmann, presented to the British authorities his plan for the Talpiot neighborhood, that was designed to be a Jerusalem garden neighborhood, it included an unidentified building of large dimensions. When he was asked about the meaning of the building he relied in German: "this is our parliament building".
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Details Education
    Inbal Ben-Asher Gitler, Sapir Academic College, Curriculum Vitae and List of Publications October 2018 CURRICULUM VITAE AND LIST OF PUBLICATIONS Personal Details Name: Inbal Ben-Asher Gitler Institutional Affiliation: Sapir Academic College / Ben-Gurion University of the Negev e-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Education B. A. 1987-1991 Yolanda and David Katz Faculty of the Arts, Tel-Aviv University M. A. 1992-1998 magna cum laude Yolanda and David Katz Faculty of the Arts, Tel-Aviv University Specialty: Art History Title of Thesis: Orientalism in architecture and interior design in Europe and America in the nineteenth century Supervisor: Dr. Edina Meyer-Maril Ph. D. 1998-2006 Yolanda and David Katz Faculty of the Arts, Tel-Aviv University Specialty: Art History Title of Thesis: The architecture of the Jerusalem YMCA building (1919-1933): constructing multiculturalism Supervisor: Dr. Edina Meyer-Maril 1999-2004 Research for Ph.D. dissertation in the United States ( at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, New York City, NY and Chicago, Illinois). 2000-2001 Attended the graduate level course “Architecture and the Market” at the Department of Art History of Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 1984-1987 Studied drawing and printing in the studio of the Israeli artist Mike Dvorsky, Ramat Hasharon, Israel 1 Inbal Ben-Asher Gitler, Sapir Academic College, Curriculum Vitae and List of Publications Awards and scholarships 2016 Sapir Academic College outstanding lecturer title. 2011 Fellowship to deliver a paper at the 27th AIS Annual Conference: “Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State,” Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHITEKTUR Sonderbeilage Nr
    ARCHITEKTUR Sonderbeilage Nr. 35 30. August 2013 ser Neus r te Pe : to Fo Realisation entwicklung ojekt Pr Immobilien eal.ch .allr www en Gall St. Cham, Bern, 8400 Winterthur: Basel, Hier realisiert Allreal den Superblock Zürich, www.superblock.ch eal-Gruppe: Allr architektur NEUES HAFENFLAIR IN HAIFA Mit dem Ziel, Haifa mit dem Meer zu verbin- den, befasst sich auch der Vorschlag für die Pläne der New Haifa Waterfront durch die Architekten Amir Mann und Ami Shinar. De- ren Büro plant die Herstellung eines gros- sen, offenen und öffentlichen Raums dem Meer entlang. In der Bucht von Haifa sollen lineare Strukturen gebaut werden, die an al- te Lagerhäuser erinnern und nur zwei Stockwerke hoch sind. Die alten Gebäude auf dem gesamten Areal sollen ihren indust- riellen Charakter beibehalten. Auch mit den alten Kränen, dem Kornreservoir und den al- ten Docks wird die Atmosphäre noch zu- sätzlich unterstrichen. [TA] PD FOTO ISRAELISCHES TEAM IM timale Energie, Produktion und maxi- Hitlers ins Mandatsgebiet Palästina SOLAR-DECATHLON-WETTBEWERB male Efzienz verbinden. Im Sommer kam, das Gebäude als Geburtshaus. 2013 wird sich erstmals ein Team aus Das Krankenhaus hatte er auf dem Ge- > Der Solar Decathlon China ist der Israel am Wettbewerb beteiligen. Die- lände eines Zitrusfrüchtehains gebaut, jüngste Spross der Familie der interna- ses präsentiert ein Verfahren zur Pla- weitab der Stadt und durchdrungen tionalen Solar-Decathlon-Wettbewer- nung und Gestaltung, wie Gebäude von Frischluft. Das Geburtshaus war be. Es ist ein Design-Wettbewerb, der besser auf die Umwelt reagieren, mo- das erste seiner Art in Israel, zu einem alle zwei Jahre stattndet und kollegi- diziert und recycelt werden können.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of European Modernism on Early 20Th-C Architecture In
    Impact of European Modernism on Early 20th- C Architecture in Palestine Explored in Major Exhibition Opening July 6, 2016 Social Construction: Modern Architecture in British Mandate Palestine Analyzes Relationship between International Modernism and Israel’s Founding Principles Jerusalem (April 21, 2016)—This summer, the Israel Museum opens a major exhibition tracing the influence of international modernism on the architectural vernacular that developed in Palestine during the British Mandate period (1917-1948). On view July 6 – December 31, 2016, Social Construction: Modern Architecture in British Mandate Palestine explores not only the beauty and functionality of the new architecture that developed in the early 20th century in cities such as Tel Aviv and Haifa, but also the social values of the new land that were reflected in this style. Focusing on projects realized between 1930 and 1940, Social Construction features more than 60 archival photographs of the architectural icons of the time, together with roughly 40 interpretive drawings of these buildings, executed over 20 years. “This exhibition extends the Museum’s exploration of Europe’s influence on the evolution of Israel’s modernist visual heritage, a phenomenon that has added a rich layer of modern appreciation to the deep meaning of the ancient fabric of the region,” said James S. Snyder, Anne and Jerome Fisher Director of the Israel Museum. “With this presentation, we are also underscoring once again how different cultures interact in their own time and over generations to create new forms of expression that take on their own distinct visual character.” Focusing on the major cities of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa, Social Construction reveals how the development of these urban centers emerged from the influence of international modernism while forming a unique architectural language inspired by the ambitions to establish a new state and to create a new social order.
    [Show full text]
  • Architekturreise Israel Tel Aviv, Haifa Und Jerusalem 7 Tage - 21.03.-27.03.2019
    architekturreise israeL teL AVIV, haifa und jerusaLem 7 tage - 21.03.-27.03.2019 Im Bauhaus-Jahr 2019 bereisen wir Israel auf den Spuren der Moderne und besuchen die drei Städte Tel Aviv, Haifa und Jerusalem. Tel Aviv ist kaum mehr als hundert Jahre alt und dennoch mit der „Weißen Stadt“ eine historisch bedeutende UNESCO-Welterbestätte. Die größte 1:1-Ausstellung von Bauhaus- architektur zeigt ca. 4000 Gebäude, die zwischen 1928 und 1945 vornehmlich von euro- päischen Einwanderern errichtet wurden. In krassem Gegegensatz zu der quirligen Metropole am östlichsten Strand des Mittel- meeres mit hippen Bars, Clubs und Restaurants steht das religiös geprägte Jerusalem. Neben Altstadt und Klagemauer gibt es auch hier Spuren der Klassischen Moderne zu entdecken. Ein Ausflug nach Haifa zeigt ein weiteres Bild Israels, eine Hafenstadt, wo Araber und Israelis friedlich miteinander leben, wo Tradition und Fortschritt ganz selbstverständlich nebeneinander stehen. Moderiert wird die Reise in deutscher und in englischer Sprache von den Architekten Tho- mas Krüger von Ticket-B in Zusammenarbeit mit den lokalen Partnern Sharon Golan Yaron und Yossi Alcalay. Ticket B Architektur Erleben Frankfurter Tor 1 · 10243 Berlin · Telefon: +49 (0) 30 42026962-0 · Telefax: +49 (0) 30 42026962-9 E-Mail: [email protected] · Internet: www.ticket-b.de · Netzwerk: www.guiding-architects.de architekturreise israeL teL AVIV, haifa und jerusaLem 7 tage - 21.03.-27.03.2019 1. Reisetag, Donnerstag 21.03.2019 - Anreise und Willkommensabendessen individuelle Anreise 18.00 Uhr Treffen in der Hotel-Lobby, Spaziergang zum Sarona Bezirk Vortrag von Gil Yaron und anschließendes Abendessen im Restaurant Olive Press Weiße Stadt 2.
    [Show full text]